Trump Reverses Course, Urges House Republicans to Back Release of Epstein Files

Trump Calls on House Republicans to Support Release of Epstein Case Files Amid Party Rift

President Donald Trump has reversed his position on a bill that would compel the Justice Department to release files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, a move that follows significant pressure from within his own party. The shift highlights an unusual moment of internal Republican conflict as lawmakers prepare for a high-profile vote. Trump’s decision signals recognition that the measure is likely to pass the House despite earlier opposition.

Growing GOP Tensions Over Epstein Legislation

President Donald Trump’s call for House Republicans to support the release of records tied to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation marks a notable departure from his earlier stance. The president had previously resisted the proposal, but mounting internal pressure and a string of public endorsements from Republican lawmakers have altered the dynamic.

Trump made the announcement late Sunday after returning to Washington from a weekend in Florida. Posting on social media, he said Republicans should “vote to release the files,” describing the controversy as a “Democrat hoax” aimed at undermining the party’s broader agenda. His message attempted to redirect political attention, urging colleagues to “get back on point” as the legislation gained momentum.

The president’s reversal follows weeks of internal discord, including an increasingly public split with Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of his most vocal allies. The dispute reflects deeper tensions inside the GOP as lawmakers weigh political loyalty against demands for transparency around an investigation that has drawn intense public scrutiny.

Votes Appear Sufficient to Advance Measure

The shift also signals a tacit acknowledgment that House supporters may already have the numbers needed to push the bill forward. Republican advocates of the measure have projected a strong bipartisan outcome, framing the effort as a transparency initiative rather than a political confrontation.

By Monday, several lawmakers backing the plan predicted a “deluge” of Republican votes in support of releasing the files. The vote is expected to test the influence of party leadership and the limits of Trump’s sway over the House Republican Conference.

In recent weeks, the president personally contacted several GOP lawmakers who signed onto the bill, including Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, who visited administration officials at the White House Situation Room to discuss the measure.

What the Bill Would Do

The legislation requires the Justice Department to release all documents, records, and internal communications related to Jeffrey Epstein, including information surrounding his death in federal custody in 2019. Epstein, who faced federal sex-trafficking charges, died in jail while awaiting trial — an event ruled a suicide by the medical examiner, though it has long fueled public speculation and calls for transparency.

Under the bill, sensitive information involving Epstein’s victims or any ongoing federal investigations could be redacted to comply with legal protections and maintain investigatory integrity.

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, one of the bill’s principal proponents, told Sunday news programs that Republican support could surpass 100 votes. He also expressed hope of achieving a veto-proof majority. Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California initiated a discharge petition in July designed to bypass House leadership and force a floor vote — a procedure historically rare and typically difficult to execute.

House Leadership Signals Reluctant Acceptance

House Speaker Mike Johnson has previously opposed the discharge petition and had attempted to steer the chamber’s agenda away from the escalating pressure surrounding the Epstein records. Earlier this year, Republican leaders ended the House session early ahead of the August recess as calls for a vote intensified.

Democrats have also accused GOP leadership of stalling the seating of Arizona Rep. Adelita Grijalva to delay reaching the threshold required to advance the petition. Grijalva became the decisive 218th signature soon after being sworn into office.

Yet Johnson’s tone shifted as the vote approached. During an appearance on Fox News Sunday, he said he expected the House to “get this done,” insisting that there was “nothing to hide.” He also noted that the Oversight Committee had already released significant documentation related to the case.

Johnson rejected suggestions that the bill was part of a partisan attempt to target the president. “He has nothing to hide from this,” Johnson said, accusing Democrats of selectively leaking materials to draw Trump into the controversy.

Trump’s Historical Link to Epstein

President Trump’s connection to Epstein has long been part of the public record. His name appeared in documents released by the Justice Department earlier this year as part of an effort to address public interest in details from the sex-trafficking investigation.

Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with the case, and investigators have emphasized that the mere presence of an individual’s name in the records does not indicate legal culpability. Epstein, who maintained relationships with numerous high-profile individuals across politics, business, and entertainment, remains a central figure in public debates around accountability and institutional transparency.

Khanna, while optimistic about bipartisan support for the bill, offered a more conservative estimate than Massie. He said he hoped at least 40 Republicans would join the effort and urged Trump to meet with victims, some of whom are expected to attend a news conference at the Capitol this week.

Internal Republican Fractures Deepen

The legislation has also exposed growing schisms within the GOP. Three Republicans joined Massie in signing the discharge petition — Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace of South Carolina, and Lauren Boebert.

Trump’s feud with Greene intensified over the past week. After announcing he would back a primary challenger against her in 2026, the president issued further criticism on social media late Sunday, calling her a “traitor.” Greene responded by saying the disagreement “has all come down to the Epstein files,” emphasizing her belief that the American public deserves clarity on the matter.

Greene said she had no knowledge of what the files contain but questioned why the president initially opposed the release. She noted that conversations with constituents indicated that many believed Trump had done nothing wrong in connection with Epstein, intensifying her confusion over his earlier position.

Massie warned that the vote will leave a lasting record for Republicans concerned about political repercussions or losing Trump’s endorsement. He said lawmakers who oppose the measure risk alienating voters who want comprehensive disclosure.

Senate Outlook Remains Uncertain

Even with anticipated strong support in the House, passage in the Senate is less certain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has not indicated whether he will bring the bill to the floor if it arrives from the House with substantial bipartisan backing.

Massie said he hopes Thune will “do the right thing” if the measure advances, predicting that House results could create momentum across the Capitol. He said he expected “a deluge of Republicans” to vote in favor, a show of unity that he believes could influence the Senate.

The debate over the Epstein files continues to shape internal Republican dynamics, testing the boundaries of party loyalty, executive influence, and demands for public transparency. As the House prepares for the vote, the issue has become a rare example of congressional pressure prompting a shift from the president himself.