Democratic Whistleblower Tells FBI Adam Schiff Approved Classified Leaks to Undermine Trump

Published Time: 08-12-2025, 10:15

A Democratic intelligence staffer reportedly informed the FBI that then-Rep. Adam Schiff authorized classified leaks aimed at discrediting President Donald Trump. The whistleblower, who worked on the House Intelligence Committee, described the conduct as “treasonous” and “illegal.” Newly declassified FBI records turned over by Director Kash Patel sparked renewed debate over political misuse of intelligence.

Allegations Detailed in FBI Interview Documents

According to FBI 302 interview summaries obtained by Just the News and released to Congress by FBI Director Kash Patel, the Democratic staffer—who served over a decade on the House Intelligence Committee—reported concerns as early as 2017. In his 2023 FBI interview, the staffer said he “personally attended a meeting where Schiff authorised leaking classified information derogatory to President Donald J. Trump” that “would be used to indict President Trump.” Colleagues reportedly reassured him that the leaks would remain undiscovered .

The whistleblower described the conduct as “unethical,” “illegal,” and “treasonous,” but noted that no prosecution followed despite the gravity of the allegations .

Whistleblower Claims Meet Institutional Silence

Just the News reporters John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy, who presented the story on Fox News’ Hannity, noted:

“This is the first of several major leak investigations we’re going to see…”
“Their own staff turned them in … nothing… happened.” (Fox News, Yahoo).

Director Patel further confirmed the documents were declassified to inform Congress, suggesting intelligence may have been weaponized:

“Declassified. Now Congress can see how classified info was leaked to shape political narratives—and decide if our institutions were weaponized against the American people,” he tweeted (X (formerly Twitter)).

Legal Implications and Institutional Response

The whistleblower’s claims highlight potential misuse of classified information for political aims. However, experts caution that legal action may be complicated by the speech and debate clause, which provides broad immunity for congressional actions. The sources say DOJ officials showed little interest in pursuing the case, despite the whistleblower’s persistent interviews from 2017 through 2023 .

As of now, no public statement or legal response has been issued by Adam Schiff’s office.

Context: A Legacy of Intelligence Oversight Controversy

Adam Schiff, now a senator, previously chaired the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). He played a central role in the Trump–Russia investigations and publicly read allegations from the Steele dossier into the congressional record in 2017. The new allegations build on longstanding scrutiny of his role in handling classified material during politically charged investigations .

Looking Forward: Political Fallout and Legislative Oversight

With Congress now in possession of these declassified FBI documents, pressure is mounting for hearings and potential legislative reforms aimed at preventing political manipulation of intelligence. Public trust in oversight institutions may depend on transparent investigations and accountability measures moving forward.