The United States on Thursday lifted its blockade of Iran, allowing commercial shipping and oil tankers to resume movement through the Strait of Hormuz after months of disruption, while Iran’s supreme leader publicly endorsed future direct negotiations with American officials.

The developments mark the first major implementation steps of the recently signed agreement intended to halt hostilities between Washington and Tehran and create a framework for broader negotiations on security and nuclear issues.

Iranian state media carried a statement from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei endorsing future face-to-face discussions with the United States, signaling a notable shift in Tehran’s approach to engagement with Washington.

“It is obvious that the face-to-face negotiations that will be held in the future will not mean accepting the enemy’s opinion,” Khamenei said in remarks broadcast by state media.

The statement represented his first public reaction to the agreement and comes after years of resistance among Iranian hard-liners to direct talks with the United States, particularly following Washington’s withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers.

Khamenei has not appeared publicly since reportedly being wounded during a strike at the beginning of the conflict.

Nuclear Inspection Plans Emerge

Additional details about the agreement emerged from a private briefing provided to U.S. lawmakers by Trump administration envoy Steve Witkoff.

According to two people familiar with the briefing who spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions were closed to the public, Witkoff said Iran would invite the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to inspect its nuclear facilities and begin efforts to identify and account for Tehran’s stockpile of enriched nuclear material.

The White House did not directly address questions regarding the reported invitation but reiterated that the agreement requires Iran to formally renounce ambitions to develop nuclear weapons.

According to the briefing, Witkoff said the agreement itself contains no undisclosed side arrangements. However, he reportedly informed lawmakers that a separate letter had been drafted between Tehran and the IAEA to facilitate inspections.

The reported correspondence would allow IAEA Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi to organize inspection efforts involving nuclear experts in Iran.

The agreement also requires that Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium be diluted under international supervision while reaffirming Tehran’s commitment not to develop nuclear weapons.

Questions Remain Over Implementation

Despite the agreement taking effect, uncertainty remains regarding the next phase of negotiations.

Vice President JD Vance suggested that a planned trip to Switzerland, where a ceremonial signing event had been expected, could be delayed.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Vance said the administration still intends to travel to Switzerland but indicated that scheduling details remain unresolved.

The uncertainty comes as the Trump administration faces criticism from some political figures in Washington who argue that the agreement offers significant concessions to Iran.

President Donald Trump has defended the accord, saying it was necessary to prevent further economic disruption caused by the conflict, which contributed to higher oil prices, market volatility and inflation concerns.

The agreement extends the existing ceasefire while providing both governments with a 60-day period to negotiate broader arrangements addressing long-term issues between the two countries.

Vance Defends the Agreement

Vance, who has become one of the administration’s most visible defenders of the agreement, argued that the accord is designed to change Iran’s behavior through diplomatic engagement and verification measures.

Responding to criticism of the rollout, the vice president rejected suggestions that public communication surrounding the agreement had been inconsistent.

He also addressed tensions involving Israel, which has advocated for a tougher approach toward Iran and conducted military operations against Iranian-backed Hezbollah forces in Lebanon during the conflict.

Vance emphasized U.S. support for Israel while signaling that Washington remains committed to implementing the agreement with Tehran.

According to the vice president, more than 12.5 million barrels of oil passed through the Strait of Hormuz on Wednesday night, a development that could help stabilize global energy markets after months of disruption.

He said the easing of the blockade represented fulfillment of U.S. commitments under the initial military provisions of the agreement.

Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command said American naval forces would remain in the region to monitor compliance and ensure that all parties adhere to the terms of the accord.

Commercial Shipping Begins to Recover

Shipping activity has already started to increase following the agreement.

At least two oil tankers reportedly departed Iran and crossed the former blockade area without interference. Shipping data indicated the vessels were transporting a combined 3.8 million barrels of Iranian crude oil.

Iranian media reported that activity at southern ports had largely returned to normal, although military authorities continue to supervise maritime traffic through the strategically important waterway.

Maritime intelligence firm Lloyd’s List Intelligence said major international shipowners have resumed transits through the Strait of Hormuz for the first time in approximately 110 days.

During a media briefing, Lloyd’s List editor-in-chief Richard Meade said vessels owned by major shipping companies had effectively been stranded from using the route since February.

According to the company, ships operated by Grimaldi Group, Cosco, Knutsen and NYK have already transited the waterway. Two Iranian-flagged crude oil tankers affiliated with the National Iranian Tanker Company were also reported to have entered the strait.

Industry representatives cautioned that challenges remain.

Phillip Belcher, marine director at tanker trade association Intertanko, said the central shipping channel remains closed and that dozens of naval mines are still believed to require removal.

For now, vessels are using alternative northern and southern transit routes through Iranian and Omani waters.

Lloyd’s List estimates that approximately 550 merchant vessels still need to exit the Persian Gulf, suggesting that a full normalization of shipping operations could take weeks or even months despite the ceasefire agreement now being in effect.

Tags: United States, Iran, Strait of Hormuz, International Negotiations, Diplomatic Talks, Nuclear Inspections, IAEA, Energy Markets, Maritime Shipping, Ceasefire Agreement

The post US Lifts Iran Blockade as Supreme Leader Endorses Direct Talks With Washington appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Trump announced the decision Monday, stating that “serious negotiations” were underway and suggesting there was still a chance to avoid further military escalation with Tehran. According to U.S. and regional reports, leaders from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates appealed directly to Washington to delay any strike while diplomatic talks continue.

The development comes amid heightened tensions across the Middle East following weeks of confrontations involving U.S., Israeli, and Iranian-linked military activity around the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.

Gulf States Push to Avoid Wider War

Trump said the planned operation involved “a very major attack” but indicated he was willing to suspend military action temporarily if negotiations produced meaningful progress. He warned, however, that U.S. forces remain prepared to act if diplomacy collapses.

Regional governments have become increasingly concerned that renewed fighting between Washington and Tehran could destabilize energy markets and threaten critical shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important oil transit corridors. Analysts noted that Gulf states are seeking to avoid becoming direct targets in any broader confrontation.

Oil prices fell after Trump’s announcement, reflecting reduced fears of an immediate military escalation. Reuters reported that global financial markets reacted positively to signs that negotiations may continue instead of shifting toward open conflict.

Nuclear Talks Remain Fragile

The diplomatic push follows reports that Iran recently presented revised proposals involving restrictions on parts of its nuclear program and possible phased reopening of the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for sanctions relief. However, major disagreements reportedly remain unresolved over uranium enrichment, missile programs, and regional security guarantees.

Trump has repeatedly warned Iran in recent weeks that military action could resume if Tehran fails to meet U.S. conditions tied to nuclear negotiations and maritime security. Over the weekend, he publicly declared that “the clock is ticking” for Iranian leaders to reach a deal.

Iranian state media portrayed the delay as evidence that Washington was reluctant to enter a broader war after months of military pressure and regional instability. Iranian officials have not formally confirmed details of the latest diplomatic exchanges.

Regional and Global Stakes Increase

The crisis has intensified international concern over the possibility of a prolonged confrontation involving Iran, Israel, and U.S. military forces stationed across the Middle East. Earlier clashes involving missile attacks, drone strikes, and maritime disruptions had already triggered fears of a wider regional war.

Security experts say Gulf governments are balancing support for U.S. regional security efforts with fears that direct conflict could severely damage economic stability, energy exports, and domestic infrastructure across the region.

Diplomatic efforts involving Gulf states, Pakistan, and other mediators are expected to continue in the coming days as negotiators attempt to preserve a fragile ceasefire framework while preventing renewed military operations.

The post Trump Delays Planned Iran Strike After Gulf Allies Push for Diplomacy appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

According to reporting from the Associated Press, delegations from the United States and Cuba convened in recent days to address a range of longstanding issues, including migration flows, sanctions enforcement, and diplomatic coordination. The discussions come amid growing pressure on policymakers to manage irregular migration and reduce tensions in the Caribbean.

Policy Shift Gains Momentum

The renewed dialogue reflects a broader policy shift within the US government, as officials seek pragmatic engagement rather than prolonged diplomatic stagnation. Analysts note that the move may represent an attempt to balance domestic political constraints with the operational need to cooperate on cross-border issues.

US officials emphasized migration as a central focus of the talks, particularly as rising numbers of Cuban nationals attempt to reach US territory. Cuban authorities, for their part, have called for greater consistency in US visa policies and a reduction in sanctions that they argue exacerbate economic hardship.

This recalibrated approach suggests Washington is prioritizing functional cooperation over ideological confrontation, even as core political disagreements remain unresolved.

Migration Pressures Drive Bilateral Engagement

Migration dynamics appear to be a key driver behind the renewed diplomatic effort. Officials from both sides acknowledged that irregular migration has placed strain on regional systems, prompting the need for coordinated responses.

In statements cited by the Associated Press, US representatives reiterated commitments to legal migration pathways while warning against dangerous sea crossings. Cuban officials highlighted the economic factors fueling migration, linking them in part to US sanctions and broader financial restrictions.

Policy experts say the talks underscore a shared recognition that migration cannot be effectively managed without direct bilateral communication, regardless of broader political tensions.

Diplomatic Channels Reopen Amid Lingering Tensions

While the meetings indicate progress, significant diplomatic challenges remain. Relations between the two countries have fluctuated sharply over the past decade, with earlier normalization efforts followed by renewed restrictions and political friction.

The latest engagement stops short of a full normalization push but reflects a willingness to reopen institutional channels. Analysts interviewed by international media suggest that even limited cooperation could reduce the risk of miscommunication and support targeted agreements on specific issues.

At the same time, domestic political considerations in the United States continue to shape the scope of engagement, particularly in the context of electoral pressures and longstanding policy divisions over Cuba.

Regional and Political Implications

The renewed diplomatic activity carries broader implications for US policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. A more stable US–Cuba relationship could influence regional migration patterns, economic coordination, and diplomatic alignments.

Observers note that the talks may also serve as a test case for how the United States manages relations with politically sensitive governments while pursuing practical policy objectives. The outcome could shape future diplomatic strategies in similarly complex geopolitical contexts.

For now, the Havana meetings represent a cautious but meaningful step toward re-engagement, with both sides signaling interest in continued dialogue despite enduring ideological differences.

The post US–Cuba Diplomatic Talks Resume as Policy Reset Signals Strategic Shift appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Major Developments We’re Following

• Possible new U.S.–Iran talks: President Donald Trump said a second round of talks with Iran could take place “within the next two days,” with Pakistan continuing mediation efforts after earlier discussions ended without agreement.
• Hormuz blockade enforcement: The U.S. military said six merchant ships turned back during the first 24 hours of blockade operations targeting Iranian ports, marking the most significant maritime escalation in the standoff so far.
• Iran’s regional warnings: Tehran has warned it may respond against targets across the wider Middle East if U.S. naval enforcement expands, according to Associated Press reporting.
• Oil and shipping disruption: Tanker movements, insurance costs, and freight routes through the Strait of Hormuz remain under pressure as shipping firms continue rerouting vessels.
• Ceasefire deadline pressure: Diplomats are racing to secure progress before the current ceasefire window expires on April 22, a key date that could determine whether the crisis moves toward de-escalation or renewed confrontation.

23:40 UTC — Diplomats Work to Arrange Fresh U.S.–Iran Meeting
Diplomatic efforts are underway to organize a second round of U.S.–Iran talks after President Donald Trump said a new meeting could happen within two days, according to The Associated Press. Pakistan remains involved in mediation efforts following the collapse of earlier nuclear negotiations.

No venue or official participant list has yet been confirmed by either Washington or Tehran.

23:32 UTC — Maritime Insurance Costs Rise Further
Shipping and insurance industry sources said risk premiums for tankers crossing Gulf waters continued to rise as uncertainty around the U.S. naval blockade persisted. Analysts cited by Reuters said insurers were reassessing exposure around the Strait of Hormuz.

23:24 UTC — European Allies Focus on Reopening Shipping Lane
Britain and France are leading preparations for a future multinational maritime mission aimed at reopening commercial passage, Reuters reported. Officials said planning discussions include around 40 countries and focus on navigation safety and sanctions coordination.

23:16 UTC — Tehran Yet to Confirm New Talks Proposal
Iranian officials have not publicly confirmed participation in any new talks despite Trump’s remarks. AP reported that mediation efforts are continuing but no formal diplomatic schedule has been announced.

23:08 UTC — Six Ships Turned Back in First Day of Blockade
The U.S. military said six merchant ships reversed course during the first 24 hours of blockade enforcement around Iranian ports. Reuters reported no vessel had breached the maritime cordon during that period.

23:00 UTC — Oil Markets Remain Highly Volatile
Energy traders continued to monitor tanker movements through the Gulf after crude prices surged on supply concerns linked to the Hormuz crisis. Reuters said the disruption has already pushed oil prices sharply higher.

22:52 UTC — Trump Repeats Call for Open Navigation
Trump reiterated that maritime traffic through Hormuz must remain open, according to AP’s latest live coverage. The White House has continued to frame the blockade as pressure tied to failed nuclear talks.

22:44 UTC — Humanitarian Cargo Exemptions Remain in Place
Reuters reported that humanitarian shipments remain exempt from the blockade after inspection, according to U.S. military officials overseeing the operation.

22:36 UTC — Industry Groups Begin Contingency Coordination
Shipping industry groups and insurers are working with European governments on contingency frameworks for restoring commercial routes once the security situation stabilizes, according to Reuters.

22:28 UTC — Gulf Tanker Traffic Continues to Thin
Maritime tracking services showed fewer tankers entering the Gulf corridor as operators continue rerouting vessels or delaying departures amid security concerns.

22:20 UTC — Pakistan Mediation Gains Diplomatic Attention
The UN Secretary-General praised Pakistan’s mediation efforts, AP reported, as diplomats sought a second round of negotiations.

22:12 UTC — European Leaders Reject Joining Blockade
Reuters reported Britain and France declined U.S. calls to join direct blockade operations, instead focusing on diplomatic and post-conflict navigation security plans.

22:04 UTC — Treasury Pressure Expands on Iran Banking Links
AP reported the U.S. Treasury Department warned foreign banks against maintaining new ties with Iranian institutions during the current standoff.

21:56 UTC — No Confirmation of Iranian Naval Movement
No independent confirmation has emerged of new Iranian naval deployments near the blockade zone, despite earlier U.S. warnings.

21:48 UTC — Energy Importers Call for Safe Passage
Officials from several major oil-importing countries urged all parties to preserve commercial navigation and avoid escalation around the strait.

21:40 UTC — Blockade Targets Iranian Port Traffic Only
U.S. officials said the blockade applies specifically to vessels entering or leaving Iranian ports and not all transit through the strait. Reuters said neutral traffic remains under close watch.

21:32 UTC — European Sanctions Discussions Advance
Diplomatic sources told Reuters that possible sanctions frameworks are being reviewed if Iran continues to obstruct maritime access.

21:24 UTC — Shipping Firms Delay New Gulf Bookings
Several global shipping operators have paused new Gulf bookings pending clarity on the duration of the blockade.

21:16 UTC — Washington Says Pressure Aims at Talks
U.S. officials continue to describe the blockade as leverage to return Tehran to nuclear negotiations, according to AP reporting.

21:08 UTC — No Multinational Naval Mission Yet Confirmed
Although discussions are ongoing, Reuters said no multinational escort or reopening mission has yet been formally authorized.

21:00 UTC — Strait Monitoring Intensifies Across Region
Regional maritime agencies have increased surveillance and vessel reporting requirements as the standoff continues.

20:52 UTC — Gulf Freight Rates Extend Gains
Freight benchmarks for crude carriers rose further in late trading as insurers and shipowners priced in blockade risks.

20:44 UTC — No Breakthrough Reported in Backchannel Talks
Diplomatic sources cited by AP said mediation channels remain open but no breakthrough has yet been reported.

20:36 UTC — Merchant Vessel Diversions Continue
Additional merchant ships altered declared destinations away from Iranian-linked ports, according to maritime monitoring cited by Reuters.

20:28 UTC — European Conference Set for Friday
France and Britain are expected to co-chair a 40-country conference focused on restoring freedom of navigation, Reuters said.

20:20 UTC — Washington Keeps Diplomatic Door Open
Despite military pressure, AP reported the White House continues to signal openness to resumed talks if Tehran agrees to renewed conditions.

20:12 UTC — Commercial Traffic Remains Severely Reduced
Shipping analysts said normal Gulf traffic remains far below seasonal averages amid blockade enforcement.

20:04 UTC — Seafarer Safety Added to Diplomatic Agenda
European officials said crew safety and release protocols are among key issues in upcoming maritime talks.

19:56 UTC — Tehran Maintains Public Silence on Schedule
Iranian authorities have not yet issued a timetable for any resumed negotiations.

19:48 UTC — Oil Buyers Seek Alternative Supply Routes
Asian refiners and European buyers are exploring alternative crude supply options as Hormuz uncertainty continues.

19:40 UTC — U.S. Naval Presence Holds Position
Reuters reported more than a dozen warships and supporting aircraft remain deployed for blockade enforcement.

19:32 UTC — Diplomatic Focus Shifts to Industry Coordination
European planners said cooperation with shipping firms is central to restoring confidence once routes reopen.

19:24 UTC — Washington Awaits Tehran Response
U.S. officials said the next diplomatic step depends on whether Iran responds positively to mediation efforts.

19:16 UTC — No Independent Verification of Counterclaims
Claims by both sides regarding naval intentions near the blockade zone could not immediately be independently verified.

19:08 UTC — Strait Remains Critical Global Focus
The Strait of Hormuz continues to carry strategic importance for global oil supply, keeping international attention fixed on developments.

19:00 UTC — Diplomatic Window Seen as Narrowing
Officials involved in mediation said the next 48 hours may be critical for determining whether diplomacy resumes.

18:52 UTC — Regional Governments Urge Restraint
Multiple governments called for de-escalation and uninterrupted maritime access through international waterways.

18:44 UTC — Tanker Operators Await Friday Talks Outcome
Major tanker operators said future routing decisions may depend on the outcome of Friday’s planned diplomatic conference.

18:36 UTC — Latest Focus Remains Talks vs Blockade Pressure
The central developments remain the prospect of fresh U.S.–Iran talks and continued enforcement of the naval blockade around Iranian ports.

What We Know

• Trump says new U.S.–Iran talks may resume within two days
• Pakistan remains involved in mediation
• U.S. military says six ships turned back
• Hormuz shipping activity remains disrupted
• No final diplomatic schedule has been announced

What We Don’t Know

• Whether Iran has accepted a new talks proposal
• The exact venue and participants
• How long blockade enforcement will continue
• Whether third-party naval escorts will be introduced

The post LIVE: Trump Signals Possible Iran Talks as Hormuz Standoff Deepens appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Sources told Reuters that Moscow passed the paper — described in diplomatic terminology as a “non-paper” — to senior U.S. officials shortly after a meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Washington in mid-October. While non-papers are often exchanged informally during negotiations to outline positions without formal attribution, this one echoed longstanding Russian conditions Ukraine has repeatedly rejected, including surrendering significant eastern territory.

The U.S. State Department and the Russian and Ukrainian embassies in Washington did not comment. The White House declined to address the document directly but referenced Trump’s recent remarks expressing optimism about progress on the peace initiative.

Russian Input Confirmed in U.S. Proposal

This marks the first confirmation that the Russian non-paper was used as a meaningful reference point for the U.S. proposal. The document contained language and concessions Russia has raised at previous negotiation attempts, including at talks in 2022 that stalled within weeks of Russia’s full-scale invasion. Ukraine has consistently ruled out territorial concessions, with President Zelenskiy stating that sovereignty and internationally recognized borders remain non-negotiable.

In a written statement, Trump said he had directed his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow while Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll held parallel talks with Ukrainian officials. The sequencing of those meetings, and the limited visibility among senior U.S. agencies, left several officials questioning how the Russian non-paper became intertwined with elements of the American plan.

Some U.S. officials who reviewed the document, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, believed the Russian terms would be rejected immediately by Kyiv, according to two sources. Rubio later acknowledged receiving “numerous written non-papers,” though he declined to elaborate.

Growing Skepticism in Washington and Europe

Since the plan first emerged in media reports last week, skepticism has intensified across U.S. government agencies and among lawmakers. Critics argue the proposal closely mirrors Russian positions rather than reflecting a balanced diplomatic effort.

Despite concerns, the United States has pressed Kyiv to engage with the framework and warned that military assistance could be reconsidered if Ukraine refused to participate, according to the sources. U.S. military support for Ukraine has totaled more than $70 billion since the invasion, according to publicly available data, making continued assistance central to Ukraine’s ability to sustain its defense.

The plan was drafted in part during a meeting in Miami last month involving Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, special envoy Witkoff and Kirill Dmitriev, who heads one of Russia’s sovereign wealth funds. Two people familiar with the matter said few officials inside the State Department or White House were informed about the discussions.

On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that Witkoff had offered communication advice to senior Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov regarding how Putin should speak to Trump. Call transcripts reviewed by the news agency referred to a potential “20-point plan” as early as October 14, which later expanded through subsequent exchanges involving Dmitriev.

Plan Scaled Back After Diplomatic Backlash

The U.S. proposal surprised officials in Washington and European capitals, triggering urgent consultations across three continents. According to ABC News, nine of the original 28 points have been removed following discussions between senior U.S. and Ukrainian officials.

A bipartisan group of U.S. senators said over the weekend that Rubio had described the proposal as a Russian “wish list,” a characterization the White House and State Department strongly denied. The contradiction fueled questions about how widely the plan was vetted inside the administration.

Diplomats familiar with the talks said a U.S. delegation, including Rubio, met European and Ukrainian counterparts in Geneva and agreed to remove or revise sections viewed as overly favorable to Moscow. Driscoll is currently holding discussions with a Russian delegation in Abu Dhabi, while Ukrainian officials have traveled to the United Arab Emirates for parallel meetings, a U.S. official confirmed.

Ukrainian officials said on Tuesday they supported the modified framework emerging from the latest round of talks but emphasized that the most sensitive points — especially territorial issues — could only be resolved in a direct meeting between Zelenskiy and Trump.

Unanswered Questions Over Influence and Process

It remains unclear why the Trump administration relied on a Russian-authored proposal to help shape its initial peace outline. Analysts note that non-papers can serve as informal diplomatic tools, but their use typically comes with broad interagency review. In this case, sources said only a small circle of advisers had access to the document before its content influenced the draft proposal.

European officials, who have backed Ukraine’s calls for a peace process based on the United Nations Charter, expressed concern that the U.S. plan appeared to diverge from internationally recognized conditions, including the withdrawal of Russian troops and restoration of territorial integrity. Several NATO governments were not given advance notice before the framework circulated.

Russia has repeatedly said it is open to negotiations but insists that Kyiv must accept the “new realities on the ground” — language referring to territory Russia claims to have annexed, moves not recognized by the United Nations.

Next Steps and Diplomatic Outlook

The updated U.S. plan remains under discussion, with further revisions expected. Zelenskiy has maintained that Ukraine will only support a peace agreement that ensures security guarantees, full sovereignty and accountability for wartime actions. Kyiv continues to advance its own 10-point peace formula, which includes nuclear safety, food security, prisoner exchanges and the withdrawal of Russian forces.

Talks are set to continue in the coming weeks, though no timeline has been announced for a potential meeting between Zelenskiy and Trump. Western diplomats caution that even a revised framework faces significant obstacles, given the scale of territorial disputes and the lack of direct negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow since 2022.

The war in Ukraine has entered its third year with front lines largely static but casualties continuing to mount. The United Nations estimates that millions have been displaced, and the conflict has had far-reaching effects on global food and energy markets.

For now, officials say the modified framework represents an ongoing attempt to keep diplomatic channels open — but with no guarantee of producing a breakthrough.

Source: Reuters – Exclusive: US peace plan for Ukraine drew from Russian document, sources say

The post U.S. Peace Plan for Ukraine Drew on Russian Proposal, Sources Say appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Saudi Arabia’s Growing Influence in Global Diplomacy

Saudi Arabia’s recent hosting of high-stakes meetings with top American, Russian, and Ukrainian officials underscores the kingdom’s ambition to position itself as a global mediator. This diplomatic initiative reflects Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s broader vision of transforming Saudi Arabia into a key player in international affairs.

On Monday night, the Crown Prince warmly welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Jeddah. This visit coincided with crucial talks between U.S. and Ukrainian officials, just days after former U.S. President Donald Trump criticized Zelensky for being “ungrateful” during a White House exchange.

Saudi Arabia’s diplomatic efforts gained momentum last month when it facilitated direct discussions between U.S. and Russian officials—the first such engagement since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described Saudi Arabia as a location that “generally suits” both Washington and Moscow, marking a significant win for Prince Mohammed’s leadership.

A Shift Toward Neutrality and Global Influence

Saudi Arabia’s evolving foreign policy aims to maintain neutrality in global conflicts, steering the nation away from regional tensions and focusing on economic transformation. Central to this shift is Vision 2030, the Crown Prince’s strategy to diversify the economy beyond oil.

Prince Mohammed has de-escalated Saudi involvement in Yemen’s prolonged war, reconciled with regional rival Iran, and strengthened ties with global powers like China and Russia—all while preserving strong relations with Western nations.

Balancing Relations with Trump and Putin

Prince Mohammed has cultivated close relationships with both Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. His ties with Trump date back to 2017 when the former U.S. president made Saudi Arabia his first foreign visit. Despite Trump’s 2020 election loss, Saudi investments in his associates continued, including a $2 billion investment in Jared Kushner’s firm and plans to build Trump-branded properties in the kingdom.

Trump recently announced he would again visit Saudi Arabia first if re-elected, following the kingdom’s pledge to invest $1 trillion in U.S. companies. “They’ve agreed to do that, so I’m going to be going there. I have a great relationship with them,” Trump stated.

Meanwhile, Prince Mohammed has maintained strong ties with Putin, who refrained from isolating him after the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The Saudi leader resisted Western pressure to cut ties with Moscow following the Ukraine invasion and has continued oil production coordination with Russia. In 2023, Putin visited Saudi Arabia and invited Riyadh to join BRICS, a coalition seeking to counter U.S. economic dominance.

Saudi Arabia as a Mediator in Prisoner Exchanges

Saudi Arabia’s diplomatic leverage has yielded tangible results. Prince Mohammed played a key role in securing the release of American teacher Mark Fogel from Russian custody. Additionally, Saudi Arabia and its ally, the UAE, have successfully brokered multiple prisoner exchanges between Russia and Ukraine.

Last month’s U.S.-Russia talks excluded Ukraine, but an upcoming meeting on Tuesday will bring together U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and top Ukrainian officials, further positioning Saudi Arabia as a central figure in peace negotiations.

The Gaza Connection: A Strategic Play for Influence

Beyond Ukraine, Saudi Arabia could leverage its diplomatic success to influence the highly contentious Gaza crisis. Trump’s controversial proposal to permanently relocate Gaza’s 2 million residents and redevelop the area into a luxury destination was met with strong opposition from Arab nations. In response, regional leaders endorsed a $53 billion reconstruction plan to ensure Palestinians remain in their homeland.

Saudi Arabia’s mediation in the Ukraine war could strengthen its standing in Washington, allowing it to push back against Trump’s Gaza relocation plan. “By facilitating President Trump’s stated goal of ending the Ukraine war, Saudi Arabia is well-positioned to accumulate goodwill in Washington and bridge the gap between U.S. and Arab positions on Gaza,” said Hasan Alhasan, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in Bahrain.

Navigating U.S.-Saudi Relations Amidst Political Complexities

Looking ahead, Prince Mohammed may continue leveraging his close ties with Trump to advance Saudi interests. However, he faces a delicate balancing act—navigating regional complexities while responding to shifting U.S. demands.

While Trump favors Saudi-Israel normalization, escalating anger in the Arab world over Israel’s military actions in Gaza makes defending Palestinian statehood non-negotiable for Prince Mohammed. “Achieving lasting and just peace is impossible without the Palestinian people obtaining their legitimate rights,” Saudi Arabia reiterated in a statement rejecting Trump’s Gaza plan.

Conclusion

Saudi Arabia’s diplomatic maneuvers reflect a strategic bid for global influence, balancing powerful alliances with both Western and Eastern nations. Whether mediating the Ukraine war or shaping Middle East policy, the kingdom’s evolving role as a geopolitical broker signals a new chapter in international diplomacy—one that could redefine its position on the world stage.

Source

The post Why Saudi Arabia is Hosting Talks to End the Ukraine War appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Beirut, Lebanon — Amos Hochstein, a U.S. envoy, has arrived in Beirut as efforts intensify to broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. According to Lebanon’s National News Agency (NNA), the visit is part of ongoing negotiations aimed at halting hostilities, though officials caution that a deal is not yet imminent.

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati expressed optimism, stating that Beirut has responded “positively” to a U.S.-backed proposal. However, an Israeli source close to the talks voiced skepticism, citing Hezbollah’s refusal to accept a key Israeli demand: the right to strike in the event of a ceasefire violation.

Details of the Potential Ceasefire Deal

The U.S.-backed proposal seeks to establish a 60-day cessation of hostilities, framing it as a foundation for a long-term ceasefire. According to Lebanese officials, the plan adheres to UN Resolution 1701, which concluded the 2006 Lebanon-Israel war. Key provisions include:

• Israeli Withdrawal: Israeli ground forces, currently operating in southern Lebanon, would withdraw.
• UN and Lebanese Army Oversight: Only the Lebanese army and UN peacekeeping forces would be permitted to operate south of the Litani River.
• Stricter Resolution Enforcement: Both sides would adhere more rigorously to Resolution 1701.

Points of Contention

Despite progress, significant hurdles remain:

1. Israeli Operational Freedom:
   Israeli officials demand the ability to strike Hezbollah in response to any ceasefire violations. Minister Bezalel Smotrich stated that “full operational freedom” for the Israeli military in southern Lebanon is “non-negotiable.”
   • Smotrich added, “At the end of the war, we will have operational freedom in Gaza, and so we will also have operational freedom in Lebanon.”
2. Lebanese Rejection of Demands:
   Lebanese leaders have strongly opposed the idea of granting Israel such operational freedom.
   • Prime Minister Mikati dismissed these reports as “speculation,” emphasizing that he has not seen such clauses in the proposal.
   • Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, an ally of Hezbollah and a key figure in the talks, told Saudi media that the U.S. proposal contains no mention of Israeli military freedom in Lebanon. He stressed that such a demand would be “unacceptable.”

Broader Implications

The talks have drawn international attention, with heightened hopes for a breakthrough. A Lebanese source familiar with the negotiations revealed that U.S. envoy Amos Hochstein has gained support from President-elect Donald Trump, a factor believed to enhance the likelihood of success.

While progress is evident, significant challenges remain before a ceasefire can be finalized. Both sides will need to navigate deep-seated mistrust and conflicting priorities as negotiations continue.

Source

The post US Envoy Visits Beirut Amid Efforts to Halt Israel-Hezbollah Hostilities appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, a prominent supporter and adviser to President-elect Donald Trump, reportedly met with Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, earlier this week. According to The New York Times, the meeting took place in New York on Monday at a secret location and lasted for over an hour.

Citing two unnamed Iranian officials, the report indicates that Musk and Iravani discussed ways to de-escalate tensions between the United States and Iran. The officials described the meeting as “positive” and “good news,” signaling a potential shift in diplomatic relations between the two nations.

Musk has been an influential figure in Trump’s political campaign, donating more than $118 million to support Trump’s election efforts after endorsing him in July. Following Trump’s victory, Musk has reportedly played a significant role in shaping Cabinet appointments and engaging with world leaders.

The New York Times suggests that this meeting could mark a shift in tone between Tehran and Washington, as the relationship between the two has been strained for years. Under Trump’s first term, the U.S. withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, which had been a key achievement of President Barack Obama’s administration. Trump also ordered the killing of Iran’s top general, further escalating tensions.

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, banned negotiations with the Trump administration during the first term, citing distrust and dissatisfaction with U.S. actions. More recently, during the 2020 campaign, U.S. intelligence agencies accused Iran of attempting to interfere with the election, including a cyberattack on Trump’s campaign.

While the details of Musk’s conversation with the Iranian ambassador remain unclear, this meeting could signal an effort to ease the longstanding tensions between the U.S. and Iran as Trump prepares to take office. Forbes has reached out to both Musk and Trump’s team for confirmation and comment.

Source

The post Elon Musk Aims to Ease US-Iran Tensions in Secret Meeting with UN Ambassador appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.