Scientists say the common cold-triggered headache offers clues to pain pathways

The sharp headache often known as “brain freeze” may last only seconds, but researchers say the phenomenon continues to provide insights into how the brain processes pain and temperature changes.

Often triggered by eating ice cream, frozen drinks, or other very cold foods too quickly, brain freeze — medically known as cold-stimulus headache or sphenopalatine ganglioneuralgia — affects a large share of the population. Researchers and medical specialists have long studied the condition because it appears to involve some of the same neurological pathways linked to migraine headaches and other pain disorders.

Health experts describe brain freeze as a brief but intense headache that typically develops when extremely cold substances come into contact with the roof of the mouth or the back of the throat. The pain is usually felt in the forehead or temples and often disappears within a minute or two.

Medical researchers have not reached complete agreement on the exact biological mechanism behind the sensation. However, several leading theories suggest that rapid cooling of tissues in the mouth triggers sudden changes in nearby blood vessels and activates pain-sensitive nerves.

Research reviewed by medical institutions including Harvard Health Publishing indicates that exposure to intense cold may cause blood vessels in the palate to constrict before quickly widening again. This rapid vascular response is thought to stimulate branches of the trigeminal nerve, one of the body’s main sensory nerves responsible for transmitting facial pain signals.

Scientists believe the brain may interpret those nerve signals as pain originating from the head rather than the mouth, a phenomenon known as referred pain. Similar mechanisms are observed in other pain conditions where the location of discomfort differs from the source of the stimulus.

Researchers have also explored whether brain freeze could help explain aspects of migraine biology. Some studies have reported that people who experience migraines may be more susceptible to cold-stimulus headaches, suggesting possible overlap in the neural pathways involved. However, researchers have not established that brain freeze causes migraines or predicts future neurological disease.

Clinical observations indicate that the condition is generally harmless. The discomfort usually resolves on its own once the temperature inside the mouth returns to normal. Medical organizations including the Cleveland Clinic describe brain freeze as a temporary physiological response rather than a sign of underlying illness.

Because episodes are brief and difficult to reproduce under controlled conditions, scientists face challenges in studying the phenomenon directly. That limitation has contributed to ongoing debate about the precise role played by blood flow changes, nerve activation, and temperature-sensitive receptors.

Some researchers argue that the body’s response may serve a protective function. Rapid temperature shifts inside the mouth can trigger reflexes designed to maintain stable conditions around sensitive tissues and blood vessels near the brain. Early findings suggest these reactions may reflect broader neurological mechanisms involved in detecting potentially harmful environmental changes.

While brain freeze remains a temporary nuisance for many people, scientists say the familiar headache continues to offer a useful window into how the nervous system interprets pain. Understanding those responses could eventually contribute to research on migraine disorders and other forms of headache, though further study is needed before drawing broader medical conclusions.

The post Why Brain Freeze Continues to Fascinate Scientists Beyond the Ice Cream Cone appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The scientific and policy significance lies in how geopolitical fossil fuel shocks are altering technology adoption curves. Energy economists and climate researchers increasingly view supply disruptions as external accelerants for low-carbon transitions, particularly in import-dependent Asian and European markets. Rather than creating a new trend, the crisis appears to be intensifying an already established shift toward electrification and distributed renewable systems.

Study Design and System-Level Energy Signals

Although the underlying source reporting is based on economic and energy systems analysis rather than a single peer-reviewed journal paper, the dominant scientific angle is technology innovation rooted in energy transition research. The evidence base includes export data, industrial market share estimates, power security modeling, and infrastructure risk assessments tied to fossil fuel chokepoints.

Recent industry analyses cited in global reporting indicate China accounts for more than 70% of electric vehicle manufacturing and roughly 85% of global battery cell production capacity. These figures matter scientifically because they show how prior long-term industrial policy, scale economics, and materials processing capacity can determine which countries benefit when energy systems face external stress.

This mirrors findings from broader climate-energy research: when hydrocarbon volatility rises, the comparative cost stability of solar, wind, and storage technologies improves. In systems terms, renewables become not only decarbonization tools but also risk-mitigation infrastructure.

Key Findings: Energy Security Is Driving Technology Uptake

The most important research-backed signal is that fuel price instability is changing behavior across multiple sectors. Higher gasoline and LNG costs are improving the near-term economic case for electric vehicles, rooftop solar, and utility-scale storage in countries heavily dependent on imported energy.

From Pakistan to Southeast Asia and Europe, policymakers and utilities are reassessing energy resilience through the lens of supply-chain diversification. Analysts cited in the reporting note that countries already importing large volumes of Chinese panels and batteries are likely to accelerate procurement as they attempt to shield grids and transport systems from prolonged oil shocks.

A parallel market indicator supports that view: investor interest in major Chinese clean-tech manufacturers has strengthened as expectations grow that renewable demand will rise under sustained oil stress.

Limitations and Uncertainty

It remains too early to treat the present surge in clean-tech demand as a permanent structural realignment. Current conclusions are based largely on real-time trade flows, energy pricing signals, and policy responses rather than long-duration longitudinal research.

Several uncertainties remain:

• whether Strait of Hormuz disruptions persist
• how quickly alternative fossil fuel supply routes normalize
• whether higher borrowing costs slow renewable infrastructure financing
• how tariffs and industrial policy in the U.S. and Europe affect Chinese export gains

The evidence currently supports correlation rather than direct causation: the war-driven oil shock is associated with stronger clean-tech demand, but long-term adoption will still depend on domestic grid readiness, financing, and regulatory frameworks.

Broader Scientific Context

The broader scientific takeaway is consistent with climate-transition literature: geopolitical instability can compress timelines for electrification by exposing the fragility of centralized fossil fuel systems.

China’s advantage stems less from the conflict itself and more from pre-existing dominance in manufacturing ecosystems for batteries, EV drivetrains, solar wafers, and storage systems. The current crisis simply amplifies the value of those capabilities at a moment when energy security and climate resilience are increasingly converging policy goals.

The post Oil Shock Accelerates Clean Energy Shift, Strengthening China’s Manufacturing Edge appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Rather than treating the portrait solely as a Renaissance masterpiece, researchers increasingly frame it as a methodological case in heritage science. Imaging conducted during major 20th-century restoration campaigns showed that later overpainting had concealed Raphael’s original unicorn motif and inserted attributes associated with Saint Catherine, including a wheel and cloak. Those discoveries established the painting as an important example of how non-invasive diagnostics can reveal hidden artistic decisions without damaging the original substrate.

Study Design and Data

The technical evidence comes primarily from sequential restoration campaigns carried out in the 1930s and later in 1959, when conservators used X-ray imaging and radiographic layer analysis to examine subsurface paint structures. These methods function as a form of material “stratigraphy,” allowing researchers to distinguish between original Renaissance pigment layers and later interventions added in the 17th century.

The dataset in this case is the painting itself: a multi-century object containing successive material revisions. Researchers compared pigment density, underdrawing traces, and compositional outlines to map the order of changes, including the replacement of religious iconography with the restored unicorn. Because the work had also been transferred from panel to canvas during conservation, the restoration history itself became part of the scientific record.

Key Findings

One of the most discussed technical findings is the reported presence of a small dog beneath the unicorn, visible in radiographic studies conducted after the first major restoration. In conservation science, this type of hidden earlier design is known as pentimento—an artist’s change in composition that remains detectable below the finished surface.

The sequence suggested by the imaging is methodologically significant: an initial dog form, later replaced by a unicorn by Raphael’s workshop or the artist himself, followed by much later overpainting that transformed the sitter into Saint Catherine. This layered chronology offers researchers an unusually clear reconstruction of artistic revision, symbolic substitution, and posthumous intervention over more than 400 years.

Limitations and Uncertainty

Despite decades of technical study, uncertainty remains over whether the lapdog was ever intended as a fully finished compositional element or merely an intermediate sketch stage. Recent curatorial research tied to the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Raphael: Sublime Poetry exhibition notes that newer state-of-the-art analysis continues to revisit earlier restoration assumptions, underscoring that imaging interpretations can evolve as methods improve.

This distinction is scientifically important because radiography often detects density differences rather than complete iconographic certainty. As with many heritage-science investigations, the evidence supports probable reconstruction rather than absolute proof, and conclusions remain sensitive to future imaging advances.

Broader Scientific Context

The case highlights the growing role of conservation science as a research discipline that merges chemistry, imaging physics, material analysis, and art history. Techniques such as X-radiography, infrared reflectography, and pigment spectroscopy are increasingly used to investigate authorship, restoration chronology, and workshop practices in major museum collections.

In this sense, the Raphael portrait is less a static artwork than a long-term research object—one demonstrating how scientific tools can recover hidden information from layered historical materials. The Met’s current exhibition explicitly places recent scientific discoveries alongside art-historical interpretation, reflecting a broader institutional shift toward evidence-led museum research.

The post Scientific Imaging Reveals Hidden Layers in Raphael Portrait’s Restoration History appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The mission did not attempt a landing or lunar orbit insertion, but it successfully tested the integrated performance of NASA’s Space Launch System and Orion spacecraft during a full crewed cislunar profile. Engineers will now use the reentry, communications blackout, and heat-shield performance data to refine spacecraft models ahead of the next phases of the Artemis program, which target docking rehearsals and eventual south polar surface operations.

Aboard the Orion capsule were NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen, whose mission also marked several historic firsts in crew diversity for lunar exploration. Beyond symbolism, the mission provided NASA with operational human-factors data on long-duration crew systems, consumables, and habitat performance in deep space.

Study Design and Mission Systems Validation

From a research and engineering perspective, Artemis II functioned as a full-scale experimental flight of NASA’s lunar transportation stack. The spacecraft traveled roughly 694,000 miles on a free-return trajectory that pushed the crew to a record 252,756 miles from Earth, surpassing Apollo 13’s human-distance benchmark.

The most consequential systems test came during atmospheric reentry, when Orion struck Earth’s upper atmosphere at roughly Mach 33. During this phase, the capsule encountered extreme plasma heating, causing a planned communications blackout that served as a real-world validation point for thermal simulations and reentry guidance models.

NASA and recovery teams are expected to conduct post-flight inspections of the ablative heat shield, parachute deployment sequence, and capsule structural integrity. These analyses are essential because lunar-return velocities impose substantially higher thermal and mechanical stress than low-Earth orbit missions.

Key Scientific and Operational Findings

The mission produced significant observational value despite its engineering-first design. Crew members documented unprecedented human-view imagery of the lunar far side and captured a total solar eclipse during the flyby, offering visual and positional datasets that may assist future mission planning and public science outreach.

Operationally, the flight also surfaced several manageable system anomalies, including valve-related issues affecting drinking water and propellant subsystems, as well as sanitation malfunctions. These are not minor footnotes in aerospace research reporting; such anomalies provide crucial failure-mode data that informs redundancy design and life-support upgrades for later Artemis missions.

One major insight from this phase is that the spacecraft maintained full mission success despite subsystem inconveniences, suggesting robust fault tolerance in Orion’s architecture.

Limitations and Uncertainty

While the splashdown represents a major milestone in space systems research, the mission remains a test flight rather than proof of readiness for sustained lunar surface operations. A flyby profile does not replicate the complexity of orbital rendezvous, lunar descent, surface habitat deployment, or extended polar mission logistics.

The spacecraft also returned with a limited sample size of one crewed reentry under lunar conditions. Aerospace engineers will need additional repeated mission data before confirming long-term reliability trends, especially for heat-shield wear, avionics resilience, and human-system performance.

Further uncertainty remains around budgetary, scheduling, and hardware readiness factors that could affect downstream Artemis timelines.

Broader Scientific Context

Artemis II’s strongest contribution to research lies in reducing uncertainty for future human lunar science campaigns. By demonstrating safe crew transport beyond Earth orbit and back, NASA has materially advanced the evidence base required for more complex exploration objectives, including south polar geology missions and eventual lunar infrastructure development.

The data from this mission is likely to shape not only Artemis III and IV flight rules, but also long-term systems engineering for Mars transit vehicles, where reentry protection, crew autonomy, and life-support resilience become even more critical.

Rather than a symbolic return to Apollo-era achievements, Artemis II represents a modern experimental platform for validating the technologies needed for sustained human research beyond Earth.

The post Artemis II Splashdown Validates NASA’s Deep-Space Systems for Future Lunar Research appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Launching aboard NASA’s Space Launch System from Kennedy Space Center, Artemis II will carry astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen on a free-return trajectory around the Moon. NASA describes the mission as the first crewed Artemis flight and a critical validation step after the uncrewed Artemis I test in 2022, with particular emphasis on human factors and spacecraft resilience.

Study Design and Mission Methodology

The mission architecture functions as an operational systems experiment in deep space. During the first day, Orion will remain in a high Earth orbit while the crew performs proximity operations using the discarded upper stage as a visual docking target. This phase is intended to test crew procedures and manual navigation techniques that future lunar missions may require.

After orbital checks, Orion’s main propulsion system will send the crew toward the Moon on a gravity-assisted free-return path, minimizing fuel use while allowing mission controllers to assess trajectory performance, communications stability, and spacecraft autonomy over extended distances. NASA says the spacecraft will travel roughly 5,000 miles beyond the lunar far side, farther than any humans have traveled before.

Key Findings Expected From the Mission

From a scientific and engineering standpoint, Artemis II is less about lunar observation and more about operational data collection. The mission will generate performance datasets on life-support endurance, radiation exposure, onboard human workflows, propulsion reliability, and thermal shielding during high-speed return.

One of the most closely watched systems is Orion’s heat shield. During Artemis I, post-flight analysis revealed unexpected erosion patterns after atmospheric reentry. Artemis II will provide the first crewed validation of revised descent parameters designed to reduce thermal stress while preserving splashdown safety margins.

The lunar far-side flyby may also offer additional observational value. While not a dedicated science mission, high-resolution crew photography and direct human visual assessments could support future landing site analysis and terrain familiarization for later Artemis surface operations.

Limitations and Uncertainty

As a test flight, Artemis II is inherently limited in scientific scope compared with a landing or orbital survey mission. It will not deploy instruments, enter lunar orbit, or conduct surface experiments. Its primary evidence value lies in engineering verification and crewed operational performance.

Uncertainty also remains around long-term hardware durability. NASA has previously faced hydrogen leak concerns in Space Launch System fueling systems, and while the agency says launch readiness reviews cleared major issues, Artemis II’s real-world flight data will provide the most meaningful assessment of integrated system reliability.

Broader Scientific Context

The broader research significance of Artemis II lies in its role as a systems-validation bridge between prototype testing and sustained lunar operations. Space agencies increasingly frame deep-space missions as iterative engineering research, where each mission produces evidence for subsequent design changes rather than serving as a standalone milestone.

For NASA, Artemis II’s operational data will directly inform Artemis III and later missions targeting the Moon’s south polar region, where future long-duration research stations may support geology, resource extraction, and life-support experiments relevant to Mars exploration.

The post Artemis II Lunar Flyby Will Test Deep-Space Systems Ahead of Future Moon Landings appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The post NASA resumes Artemis II preparations after repairs on Space Launch System rocket appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The photograph, taken last month by the Gemini South telescope in northern Chile, showcases the nebula’s glowing, wing-like lobes of gas. The object sits roughly 2,500 to 3,800 light-years away in the constellation Scorpius. Its vast, symmetrical form is the result of a star shedding its outer layers—an event that generates some of the most visually striking sights in astronomy.

A vibrant cosmic scene shaped by a dying star

The Chile telescope discovery provides a detailed look at a classic bipolar nebula, a category defined by lobes of gas extending in opposite directions from a central star. At the heart of this structure lies a compact white dwarf, once a Sun-like star that reached the end of its life cycle.

After exhausting its nuclear fuel, the star expelled large portions of its outer atmosphere into space. These gases now form the luminous “wings” that give the Butterfly Nebula its name. Gas clouds glow when heated by strong ultraviolet radiation from the central stellar core, creating a layered, colorful pattern visible in the new image.

Planetary nebulae like this one represent a fleeting phase in a star’s evolution, lasting only a few tens of thousands of years—brief moments on cosmic timescales. Stargazers and astronomers value these objects for their ability to reveal how stars disperse heavy elements that eventually seed new generations of stars and planets.

Gemini South marks 25 years of shared sky-watching

The image was taken as part of a special initiative celebrating 25 years of the International Gemini Observatory, which operates twin telescopes in Hawaii and Chile. Schoolchildren in Chile were invited to help select the observation target, choosing the Butterfly Nebula from a range of astronomical candidates.

Researchers at NSF’s NoirLab said the project was designed not only to showcase the observatory’s capabilities but also to highlight how science education programs can connect communities with discoveries taking place just beyond the visible night sky.

Gemini South, located on Cerro Pachón in the Andes, benefits from exceptionally clear atmospheric conditions and advanced adaptive optics. The instrument is part of a global network of ground-based telescopes supporting research across stellar evolution, exoplanet discovery, galaxy formation, and transient cosmic events.

A growing collection of nebular portraits

The Butterfly Nebula, officially designated NGC 6302, is known for its dramatic structure and extreme temperatures. Earlier studies suggest that the central white dwarf may exceed 200,000 degrees Celsius, making it one of the hottest stars known. Though invisible in the latest wide-field image, its influence shapes the nebula’s intricate arcs and filaments.

This new portrait adds to a growing gallery of detailed nebular images produced by observatories around the world. Similar efforts include the European Southern Observatory’s views of the Ant Nebula and NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope observations of the Cat’s Eye Nebula. Each reveals different stages and structures that arise when aging stars eject their outer layers.

Astronomers study these objects to understand how stellar winds interact with previously expelled shells of gas, forming patterns that vary from hourglass shapes to ring-like halos and complex knots. The Butterfly Nebula is considered one of the most symmetrical examples, making it a frequent target for both professional research and public outreach.

Why these discoveries matter

Beyond their visual appeal, nebula observations help researchers refine models of star formation and chemical enrichment across the galaxy. Gas expelled in the final stages of a star’s life contains elements such as carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen—building blocks for planets, atmospheres, and organic chemistry.

Detailed imaging also allows scientists to examine the speed and direction of nebular expansion. In some cases, planetary nebulae reveal evidence of binary star interactions, stellar outbursts, or asymmetrical winds that shape the surrounding material.

Though this latest image does not alter existing scientific theories, it demonstrates how modern optical facilities continue to enhance the clarity, color range, and precision of deep-sky photography. Observatories in Chile, including Gemini South and the forthcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory, are expected to play an increasingly central role due to ideal conditions in the Atacama and Andean regions.

A public moment for a scientific milestone

For many astronomers, the picture represents a bridge between the observatory’s 25-year legacy and the next generation of scientific exploration. For the Chilean students who helped select the target, it transformed a distant astrophysical concept into something real and vividly bright.

The release offers a reminder of how human curiosity often intersects with advanced instruments to reveal the hidden structures of the cosmos. Even familiar objects such as the Butterfly Nebula can appear renewed when viewed through improved lenses and fresh eyes—proving that the night sky still holds surprises, even in well-charted constellations.

As Gemini South continues its observations, researchers say they expect more opportunities to combine scientific discovery with educational outreach, ensuring that public engagement remains an integral part of modern astronomy.

Source: AP News – Telescope in Chile captures stunning new picture of a cosmic butterfly

The post Chile Telescope Discovery Reveals Striking New Image of Cosmic ‘Butterfly’ appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

What Is the Orionid Meteor Shower?

Meteor showers occur when Earth passes through debris left by comets or asteroids. The Orionids are created from Halley’s comet, which approaches Earth roughly every 75 years.

When fast-moving debris enters Earth’s atmosphere, friction heats the particles until they burn up, producing bright streaks of light known as meteors. Occasionally, these meteors leave “trains,” lingering glowing trails across the night sky.

“Sometimes the Orionids leave trains, these bright lingering streaks in the sky,” said Thaddeus LaCoursiere, planetarium program coordinator at the Bell Museum in St. Paul, Minnesota.

No special equipment is needed to enjoy the display—any dark location away from city lights is ideal.

Best Practices for Viewing

The optimal time to watch is after midnight or in the early pre-dawn hours, when skies are darker and moonlight interference is minimal.

Artificial lights and bright moons are the primary obstacles to clear meteor visibility. Cloudless nights with a waning or new moon offer the best conditions.

Observers should avoid looking at screens and keep their eyes on the sky, allowing night vision to adjust and improving the chances of spotting meteors.

Upcoming Meteor Showers

Following the Orionids, the next major meteor shower will be the Southern Taurids, expected to peak on November 5, coinciding with a full moon. While moonlight may reduce visibility, dedicated stargazers can still catch some meteors during the event.

“The Orionids are one of the most reliable meteor showers of the year,” LaCoursiere said. “Weather permitting, it will be a great show for anyone who wants to witness the magic of the night sky.”

Stay informed with JournosNews.com — your trusted source for verified global reporting and in-depth analysis. Follow us on Google News and BlueSky for real-time updates.

Source: AP News – How to watch the Orionid meteor shower, debris of Halley’s comet

The post How to Watch the Orionid Meteor Shower This Week appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — Imagine being able to summon a total solar eclipse on demand—not for a few fleeting minutes, but for hours at a time. Thanks to a pair of high-tech European satellites, that’s now a reality.

In a first-of-its-kind feat, the European Space Agency (ESA) has created artificial solar eclipses in space, giving scientists unprecedented access to the sun’s mysterious outer atmosphere—its corona. The breakthrough, made possible by two tiny cube-shaped satellites flying in perfect harmony, was revealed this week at the Paris Air Show.

How They Did It: Precision in Orbit

The mission, dubbed Proba-3, involves two satellites launched late last year. Since March, they’ve been flying in a carefully choreographed formation about tens of thousands of miles above Earth, maintaining just 492 feet (150 meters) of separation.

Here’s the magic:

• One satellite acts like the moon, blocking the sun with a specially designed disk.
• The other trails behind, aiming its telescope directly at the corona, the sun’s outer glow visible only during an eclipse.

The trick is doing this with millimeter-level accuracy—about the width of a fingernail. It’s an autonomous ballet, guided by GPS, star trackers, lasers, and radio links.

Why It Matters: Eclipses On-Demand, Data in Overdrive

Unlike natural solar eclipses, which only offer a few minutes of totality and happen roughly once every 18 months, Proba-3 can simulate them as often as twice a week. Over its two-year mission, it’s expected to produce nearly 200 artificial eclipses, totaling over 1,000 hours of observation time.

Scientists are already thrilled. During the mission’s test phase, Proba-3 successfully created 10 eclipses, including one lasting an incredible five hours. And that’s just the warm-up—researchers are aiming for six-hour eclipses when full scientific observations begin in July.

“We almost couldn’t believe our eyes,” said Dr. Andrei Zhukov of the Royal Observatory of Belgium. “This was the first try, and it worked. It was so incredible.”

What’s even more exciting? Early images of the corona are so crisp they didn’t even require special post-processing.

Unlocking the Sun’s Greatest Mysteries

The sun’s corona continues to puzzle scientists, especially because it’s hotter than the sun’s surface—a longstanding solar mystery. It’s also where coronal mass ejections erupt, hurling massive amounts of charged particles into space and triggering geomagnetic storms that can disrupt power grids and light up skies with unexpected auroras.

Previous missions like ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter and SOHO also studied the sun using artificial eclipses—but with one key difference: those missions placed both the sun-blocking disk and the telescope on the same spacecraft.

With Proba-3, the disk and the telescope are on separate satellites, giving researchers a much clearer and more detailed view of the corona—especially near the sun’s edge.

“We are extremely satisfied by the quality of these images,” said ESA mission manager Damien Galano. “And that’s really thanks to formation flying with unprecedented accuracy.”

In short:

We’re no longer at the mercy of the moon to study solar eclipses. With Proba-3, scientists now have a powerful tool to uncover the sun’s secrets—any time they want.

Source: AP News – A look at the first artificial solar eclipses created by two European satellites

The post Europe Creates First Artificial Solar Eclipses Using Dual Satellites appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A rare and nearly complete Archaeopteryx fossil—kept hidden in a private collection for over three decades—has finally been unveiled to the scientific world, and the findings are nothing short of groundbreaking.

Recently acquired by the Field Museum in Chicago, this spectacular specimen of the earliest known bird is helping scientists better understand how flight evolved in dinosaurs. And for researchers who’ve waited years for access, the results have been “one wow after another.”

Fossil Reveals Flight-Ready Feathers

The 150-million-year-old fossil, about the size of a pigeon, is one of only 14 known Archaeopteryx specimens. But unlike others, it’s remarkably well preserved in 3D and contains fossilized soft tissues rarely seen in similar finds.

Using ultraviolet light and CT scans, paleontologists uncovered flight feathers known as tertials, which are critical for powered flight in birds. These feathers grow near the elbow and body and had only been hypothesized in Archaeopteryx—until now.

“This is the first concrete evidence that Archaeopteryx had the feather structure necessary for active flight,” said Dr. Jingmai O’Connor, lead author of the study and associate curator at the Field Museum.

More Than Just Feathers

The fossil didn’t stop at feathers. Researchers also discovered details in the toe pads that suggest the creature foraged on the ground—similar to modern birds like pigeons. And bones in the roof of its mouth offered clues about cranial kinesis, the ability of birds to move parts of their skulls independently, enhancing beak flexibility.

“It’s just revelation after revelation,” said O’Connor. “The preservation is unlike anything we’ve seen.”

A Long-Awaited Breakthrough

The fossil had been privately held since 1990, inaccessible to scientists. The Field Museum took a chance on acquiring it in 2022, not knowing its condition. What they got turned out to be a once-in-a-generation discovery.

“This might be the most significant fossil acquisition since SUE the T. rex,” said museum president Julian Siggers.

Field Museum fossil experts spent over 1,600 hours meticulously preparing the specimen—scanning, cleaning, and reconstructing it in 3D to unlock its secrets.

Could Archaeopteryx Actually Fly?

Dr. Susan Chapman, a bird evolution expert at Clemson University, praised the find. “This specimen gives us unprecedented insight into the transition from dinosaurs to modern birds,” she said. However, she noted that while Archaeopteryx could likely fly, it wasn’t built for long-distance travel. It lacked modern flight adaptations like a strong keel bone for anchoring powerful flight muscles.

Even so, the presence of tertials makes it clear: this early bird wasn’t just gliding—it was flapping.

A Lesson in Access

Beyond the science, the fossil also reignites a broader conversation about fossil access. “When fossils are locked away in private collections, vital data is lost—sometimes forever,” Chapman said. “This discovery shows just how important open scientific access is.”

O’Connor agrees. And with more analysis still underway, she believes this fossil has even more stories to tell.

“We’re just getting started,” she said. “There’s so much more to discover—and I hope everyone finds it as thrilling as we do.”

Source: CNN – A rare Archaeopteryx fossil was kept from scientists for decades. Its first-ever analysis reveals ‘one wow after another’

The post Archaeopteryx Fossil Finally Studied—And It’s Changing What We Know About Bird Evolution appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.