The Wolfsburg-based company said Friday that group deliveries fell 8.6% year over year to just under 2.1 million vehicles during the April-to-June period. Sales in China, one of Volkswagen’s largest markets, dropped by more than one-third, underscoring the challenges the company faces in the world’s largest automotive market.

The sales figures were released a day after Volkswagen announced the next stage of what it described as a “fundamental realignment” of the company, including plans to reduce its model lineup by nearly half. The automaker did not specify which models or brands would be affected.

Volkswagen accelerates restructuring efforts

Following a board meeting on Thursday, Chief Executive Officer Oliver Blume said Volkswagen’s strategy is intended to make the company faster, less complex and more competitive in an increasingly difficult global market.

According to the company, the restructuring will focus on reducing complexity, concentrating investment on core technologies, improving alignment across regional markets and cutting excess production capacity.

Volkswagen said the automotive industry has changed significantly over the past year, citing geopolitical tensions, higher costs driven largely by tariffs, stricter regulatory requirements and intensifying competition as key pressures on its business.

Core brands post weaker deliveries

The company’s largest passenger vehicle brand, Volkswagen, delivered just over 1 million vehicles during the second quarter, representing a 14% decline from the same period last year.

Audi deliveries fell 8%, while Porsche reported an 18% drop in vehicle deliveries.

Not all parts of the group experienced declines. Lamborghini, Skoda and Volkswagen’s truck division recorded sales growth during the quarter. Regionally, deliveries increased in both Europe and the Americas, partially offsetting weakness in China.

China remains a critical challenge

The steep decline in Chinese sales highlights the competitive pressures facing established global automakers as domestic manufacturers continue to expand their share of the country’s rapidly growing electric vehicle market.

As recently as December, Volkswagen had reaffirmed its long-term commitment to China despite intensifying competition.

Research firm BernsteinSG questioned the company’s strategic outlook following Thursday’s restructuring announcement.

In a research note, BernsteinSG said Volkswagen’s assertion that it is extending its technology leadership “will likely raise eyebrows given the pace of innovation among its Chinese competitors.”

Workers protest restructuring plans

The restructuring announcement also prompted labor concerns in Germany.

On Thursday, hundreds of employees protested outside Volkswagen’s plant in Zwickau, calling for stronger job protections and opposing plans to close the facility.

The Zwickau factory has fully transitioned to producing electric vehicles and has been a key part of Volkswagen’s shift toward battery-powered transportation.

Volkswagen’s latest restructuring initiative reflects the mounting pressure on traditional automakers to adapt to slowing demand, rising costs and rapidly evolving competition, particularly as Chinese manufacturers strengthen their position in the global electric vehicle market.

This report is based on reporting by The Associated Press.

Article Topics: Volkswagen | Auto Industry | China Market | Corporate Restructuring | Electric Vehicles | Germany | Vehicle Sales

The post Volkswagen Unveils Sweeping Restructuring After Global Sales Fall Sharply in Second Quarter appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The three-wheel vehicles, many manufactured in China and later modified with rooftop solar panels, are replacing gasoline-powered cars and filling gaps left by a sharply reduced public transportation system. For many Cubans, they have become an essential means of moving people and goods despite the country’s strained electricity grid.

Alternative transport emerges amid fuel crisis

Cuba’s familiar vintage automobiles have become less common on the streets as access to fuel has deteriorated.

Electric tricycles, typically costing between $2,000 and $4,000, are now widely used to transport passengers, deliver goods and operate along routes once served by buses. In some Havana neighborhoods, they also collect household waste.

Many owners have sold older gasoline-powered vehicles to finance the purchase of the tricycles. Others received them from relatives living abroad, where prices are generally lower, while some entrepreneurs invested in them using income from their businesses.

The shift has accelerated amid tighter fuel supplies. In January, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened tariffs on countries exporting oil to Cuba, which produces only about 40% of the fuel it consumes. Since then, only one oil tanker has arrived on the island—reaching Cuba in late March—compared with roughly eight shipments per month previously.

Daily life affected by energy shortages

Reduced fuel imports have intensified Cuba’s long-running energy crisis, leading to more frequent rolling blackouts and further disrupting daily life.

Food and medicine shortages have deepened, while public transportation services have been significantly reduced, increasing reliance on privately operated electric vehicles.

For many residents, the tricycles provide one of the few available transportation options.

“This is how people get around now,” said Liecer de la Cruz, a 40-year-old tricycle owner.

Berta Ferrer, a 52-year-old store clerk in central Havana, said she regularly uses the vehicles to travel to work.

“If you can pay for it, you just take it; otherwise you can’t go anywhere,” Ferrer said.

She pays about 500 Cuban pesos—less than one U.S. dollar—for each trip, a considerable expense in a country where average monthly salaries are about $10 for state employees and around $40 in the private sector.

Solar panels reduce reliance on the power grid

Many owners have added solar panels to the roofs of their tricycles, allowing batteries to recharge while parked or in operation and reducing dependence on Cuba’s overstretched electrical system.

Electric tricycles from Chinese manufacturers including Zonsen and Jinpeng have become common across the island. Many are purchased in countries such as Panama before being shipped to Cuba by relatives or importers for resale. Others are assembled domestically under an agreement with China using the Vedca brand.

Carlos Álvarez, a 29-year-old engineer who operates an electric vehicle workshop in Havana, said demand for solar conversions has grown rapidly.

While installing a solar panel system costs about $500, he said owners can recover the investment relatively quickly by avoiding fuel expenses and maintaining operations during power outages.

“There are so many tricycles in Havana that you can’t spend 10 minutes on a street without seeing countless numbers of them pass by,” Álvarez said.

Long-term shift in Cuba’s transportation

Beyond serving as a response to current shortages, many Cubans believe the electric tricycles will remain a permanent feature of the country’s transportation network.

Engineer Ricardo Quintero uses his vehicle to transport produce for the family vegetable business and expects the technology to remain relevant even after current fuel shortages ease.

“I think this is here to stay,” Quintero said.

As Cuba continues to confront energy shortages and economic challenges, solar-powered electric tricycles have become both a practical adaptation to immediate hardships and an example of how residents are finding alternative ways to maintain mobility despite limited resources.

This report is based on reporting by The Associated Press.

Article Topics: Cuba | Electric Tricycles | Solar Energy | Fuel Shortages | Blackouts | Transportation | China | Economy

The post Solar-Powered Tricycles Keep Cuba Moving as Fuel Shortages and Blackouts Persist appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A fire at Chinese electric-vehicle giant BYD’s Shenzhen industrial complex has renewed focus on industrial safety and risk management in the EV sector, after the company said the blaze broke out in a parking garage used for “test and scrapped vehicles.” The fire was extinguished without casualties, according to company and local fire authorities, limiting the immediate operational impact but drawing wider attention because the site is tied to BYD’s global headquarters footprint in Shenzhen’s Pingshan district.

The dominant international framing here is strategic industrial resilience, as BYD remains central to global EV supply chains and China’s export-led automotive expansion. Any fire incident at a Shenzhen facility—particularly one associated with vehicle storage and testing—carries implications for investor confidence, battery-safety narratives, and the broader competitiveness debate between Chinese EV manufacturers and overseas rivals. Reuters reported that BYD shares slipped modestly after the incident, underscoring how even contained events can ripple through market sentiment.

Supply-Chain Confidence Faces a Reputational Test

Videos verified by Reuters showed thick black smoke and flames spreading across a long section of a multistory parking structure, with fire trucks and police rapidly deployed. While BYD emphasized that the affected vehicles were not customer deliveries but rather test and scrapped units, the imagery is likely to feed ongoing international scrutiny over how EV makers handle battery isolation, end-of-life storage, and fire suppression systems.

That distinction matters commercially. Storage areas for decommissioned or engineering-test vehicles often carry elevated fire risks because damaged battery packs can be unstable, particularly if they are awaiting teardown, diagnostics, or recycling. The absence of casualties and the fast containment response may help limit reputational fallout, but global regulators and insurers will still watch closely for findings on ignition source and structural safeguards.

Battery Safety Debate Extends Beyond China

The incident also lands at a sensitive time for the international EV industry, where fire risks remain politically and commercially significant. Experts cited by Reuters noted that EV fires often burn longer than internal-combustion vehicle fires and may reignite, complicating emergency response and increasing pressure on automakers to refine thermal-runaway prevention and scrappage procedures.

For BYD, which has aggressively expanded across Europe, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, the broader issue is not the isolated blaze itself but whether such incidents influence overseas regulators, fleet buyers, and consumers already weighing battery-safety assurances. As Chinese EV brands compete more directly with Western and Korean manufacturers, operational incidents at home can quickly become part of international trade and trust narratives.

Strategic Stakes Rise for China’s EV Leadership

Shenzhen is more than a factory location—it is a symbol of China’s leadership in next-generation mobility. A fire involving scrapped and test vehicles at such a flagship industrial base highlights the hidden risks embedded in the EV lifecycle, particularly around recycling, storage, and post-test engineering fleets.

The longer-term geopolitical implication is that as China’s EV makers dominate global growth, industrial incidents increasingly become strategic headlines, shaping perceptions of manufacturing quality, regulatory discipline, and technological trust. Even a contained fire with no injuries can influence how international markets assess resilience in the world’s most important EV supply ecosystem.

The post BYD Shenzhen Garage Fire Raises Fresh Questions Over EV Facility Safety appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

With Indonesia now accounting for roughly 60% of global nickel supply in 2024, up from 31.5% in 2020 according to S&P Global Market Intelligence, the country occupies a pivotal role in the energy transition. That rise followed a 2020 ban on raw nickel ore exports introduced under former President Joko Widodo, which spurred a surge of Chinese-backed investment in domestic smelting and refining.

Yet the tightening of control comes as global battery technology shifts, reducing reliance on nickel-heavy chemistries and raising questions about the long-term payoff of Indonesia’s strategy.

Environmental trade-offs and industrial expansion

Indonesia holds the world’s largest nickel reserves, much of them concentrated on the island of Sulawesi. According to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), the island accounts for more than half of global nickel mine production.

China has long sourced nickel from Indonesia, but ties deepened after the 2020 export ban redirected raw ore into domestic processing. Imports of nickel matte — a semi-processed material used in battery chemicals and alloys — into China increased nearly 28-fold between 2020 and 2023, with more than 90% of supply coming from Indonesia, trade data show.

During the same period, the share of global nickel output from North and South America fell from 16% to 7%, while Europe’s share declined from 35% to 10%, according to the International Nickel Study Group.

The rapid buildout has come at an environmental cost. An analysis by the World Resources Institute found that mining drove the loss of about 370,000 hectares of Indonesian forests between 2001 and 2020 — more than in any other country during that period. Over one-third of the loss involved old-growth rainforest, critical for carbon storage and biodiversity.

Coal-fired power has underpinned much of Indonesia’s nickel processing expansion, complicating its climate goals. IEEFA reported in 2024 that major nickel producers emitted roughly 15 million metric tons of greenhouse gases in 2023, largely due to coal reliance. The growth of smelters has increased fossil-fuel demand even as Jakarta seeks to reduce emissions.

In one high-profile episode last year, Indonesian soldiers accompanied by local media took control of part of what is considered the world’s largest nickel mine. The site is mostly owned by Tsingshan Holding Group. A 2024 report by the nonprofit Climate Rights International cited deforestation, pollution, coal-related emissions and displacement of communities linked to the operation.

Analysts say the recent state interventions are not primarily aimed at environmental remediation. Instead, they reflect efforts to reassert greater national leverage over a sector that has become strategically vital.

EV ambitions meet shifting battery technology

Indonesia’s nickel policy was designed to anchor a fully domestic electric-vehicle value chain, spanning mining, battery production and vehicle assembly. Early interest came from South Korean and Chinese firms seeking to secure supplies for the rapidly growing EV market.

In July 2024, Hyundai Motor Group and LG Energy Solution opened Indonesia’s first EV battery-cell plant, with capacity to supply more than 150,000 vehicles annually. However, in April 2025, LG Energy Solution withdrew from a larger $8.4 billion battery investment, citing market and investment conditions.

Chinese automaker BYD is building an EV plant in Indonesia, while CATL, the world’s largest EV battery maker, is constructing a battery factory in partnership with Indonesian state firms.

Domestically, EV adoption remains limited. Indonesia sold just over 43,000 electric vehicles in 2024, about 5% of total car sales, according to the Indonesian Business Council. Public charging infrastructure numbered around 1,500 stations nationwide.

Even if Indonesia were to produce one million EVs annually — roughly equivalent to total yearly auto sales — and rely heavily on nickel-rich batteries, that would consume less than 1% of its national nickel output, according to the Jakarta-based Energy Shift Institute. The scale of domestic demand remains small compared with production capacity.

At the same time, battery chemistry is evolving. Automakers are increasingly adopting lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which use little or no nickel or cobalt. The International Energy Agency has reported that LFP batteries are now used in nearly half of all EVs globally, reflecting their lower cost and improved stability.

The shift has tempered expectations that nickel will dominate the EV transition indefinitely.

Between Washington and Beijing

Indonesia’s tightening of state control unfolds against intensifying geopolitical competition. Both Washington and Beijing view critical minerals as central to economic security and clean-energy leadership.

Some analysts suggest that Indonesia’s nationalization drive could reduce Beijing’s dominance over segments of the supply chain, potentially creating room for greater U.S. engagement. Jakarta has invited American investment in its critical minerals sector as part of ongoing trade and tariff discussions.

One possible concession under discussion has been lifting the ban on raw nickel exports to the United States, a move that would mark a significant shift from the resource-nationalist policy introduced in 2020.

Yet balancing relations between the two powers presents a challenge. China remains Indonesia’s largest industrial partner in nickel processing, while the United States seeks to diversify supply chains away from Chinese control.

Regional governments across Southeast Asia are closely observing how Jakarta navigates this terrain. Greater state intervention could strengthen national control, but it may also introduce regulatory uncertainty.

Analysts caution that land seizures and abrupt policy changes risk deterring foreign capital at a time when large-scale investment remains essential to sustain mining and downstream processing.

For Indonesia, nickel has become both an economic opportunity and a test of governance. The country sits at the heart of the global critical-minerals race, but the future of its strategy now depends on how it manages environmental pressures, technological shifts and geopolitical crosscurrents.

Source: AP News – Indonesia tightens control on nickel as the US and China scramble for critical minerals

The post Indonesia Tightens Control Over Nickel as U.S. and China Compete for Critical Minerals appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The global semiconductor industry has faced unprecedented strain over the past several years, revealing the fragility of supply chains for the small but essential chips that power everything from smartphones and electric vehicles to medical devices. A combination of pandemic disruptions, geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, and surging demand has created a persistent global chip shortage with far-reaching industrial and economic consequences.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted production patterns and demand forecasts, while trade frictions between the United States and China further complicated supply flows. Meanwhile, emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, 5G, and electric vehicles have pushed demand for semiconductors to new heights. The shortage has affected multiple sectors, notably automotive, consumer electronics, and healthcare, prompting governments and corporations to take unprecedented steps to stabilize production.

Industry experts warn that supply chain pressures and price fluctuations may persist for several more years, underscoring the strategic importance of semiconductors in a digitized global economy.

Pandemic-Driven Supply Shifts

The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped the semiconductor market in unexpected ways. Lockdowns forced many automakers and manufacturers to cancel or reduce chip orders, while consumers increased spending on home electronics, including laptops, gaming consoles, and remote work equipment. Some semiconductor plants shifted production from automotive to consumer electronics chips, creating a misalignment when car production rebounded more quickly than anticipated.

In Southeast Asia, pandemic-related restrictions temporarily closed facilities that assemble and test chips, compounding the disruption. These production bottlenecks exposed the industry’s dependence on geographically concentrated manufacturing.

Geopolitical Tensions and Trade Controls

The intensifying trade dispute between the U.S. and China further exacerbated shortages. Restrictions on the export of advanced semiconductors, key components, and rare earth materials prompted companies to stockpile critical supplies. These moves strained already fragile supply chains, with ripple effects felt globally across technology and automotive sectors.

Rising Demand from Electronics and AI

Demand for semiconductors has surged due to multiple technological trends. Faster computers, 5G networks, data centers, electric vehicles, and IoT devices have increased the volume of chips required worldwide.

Artificial intelligence has introduced a new layer of pressure. Large-scale AI systems require millions of high-performance chips, intensifying competition among technology companies. Retail electronics prices have risen in response: memory chips and devices such as hard drives and smartphones have seen marked price increases in markets including Japan and China. Major tech firms, including Microsoft, Google, and ByteDance, are competing heavily for memory supplies, which could continue to strain availability through 2027, according to industry executives.

Natural Disasters and Production Interruptions

Natural and human-made disasters have also disrupted chip production. Fires at Japan’s Renesas Electronics plant in 2021, winter storms in Texas, droughts in Taiwan affecting TSMC’s operations, and a 7.6-magnitude earthquake in Japan in 2024 each caused temporary halts in production. The semiconductor industry’s reliance on specific geographic regions and water-intensive manufacturing processes makes it highly sensitive to such events.

Sectoral Impacts

Automotive: Microcontrollers are critical for vehicle safety, engine management, and infotainment. Global auto production declined by over 10 million vehicles in 2021, with multiple plants in North America and Europe temporarily idled. Manufacturers prioritized high-margin models, delayed lower-profit vehicle lines, and in some cases collaborated directly with chipmakers or developed in-house alternatives.

Consumer Electronics: Product shortages, delayed smartphone launches, and rising component costs have affected consumer electronics. Memory chip prices rose approximately 30% in late 2024 due to AI-driven demand, with further increases anticipated. Competition for components has destabilized longstanding supply chains, particularly for AI server and gaming hardware.

Healthcare: Medical devices, including MRIs, CT scanners, and respiratory equipment, rely on semiconductors. Shortages have raised concerns about patient care, especially as pandemic-driven demand increased. Governments and industry groups have urged prioritization of medical device chips to mitigate the impact.

Workforce and Talent Pressures

The rapid growth of the semiconductor market, valued at US$697 billion in 2024, has highlighted a talent shortage. In the U.S., 55% of the semiconductor workforce is over 45, while Europe faces a similar risk. McKinsey estimates over 200,000 engineers are needed across Asia-Pacific, excluding China, and more than 100,000 in the U.S. and Europe. Efforts to attract and train workers are increasingly critical to sustaining production.

Government Initiatives

Governments worldwide have prioritized semiconductor production. The U.S. CHIPS and Science Act (2022) provides over US$76 billion in incentives for manufacturing, research, and workforce development. Companies including Intel, Samsung, and TSMC have announced multibillion-dollar investments, such as TSMC’s US$40 billion facility in Arizona.

Europe’s Chips Act (2023) aims to raise €43 billion in public and private investment to double the continent’s market share to 20% by 2030, though progress is slowed by structural and regulatory challenges.

In Asia, South Korea, Japan, and China have expanded subsidies, tax incentives, and low-interest loans to maintain competitiveness. China’s state-backed semiconductor firms received US$2.82 billion in 2024, a 35% increase from 2022, reflecting Beijing’s push for technical self-sufficiency amid U.S. tensions.

Outlook

The global semiconductor shortage highlights the sector’s strategic importance to modern economies. Disruptions from pandemics, geopolitics, natural disasters, and rising demand have affected industries from automotive and electronics to healthcare. Governments and companies are investing heavily to reinforce supply chains, but experts caution that challenges may persist well into the latter half of the decade.

Source: Expertnetworkcalls – Causes of the Global Semiconductor Shortage and its Impact

The post Global Semiconductor Shortage: Causes and Industrial Impact appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

At the company’s annual meeting in Austin, Texas, on Thursday, more than 75% of shareholders voted in favor of reinstating the multibillion-dollar pay plan, which had been voided earlier this year by a Delaware court. The plan grants Musk stock options valued at up to $1 trillion if Tesla achieves a series of aggressive performance targets over the next decade.

“Fantastic group of shareholders,” Musk said after the vote, adding, “Hang on to your Tesla stock.”

Investor Confidence Amid Falling Sales

The approval marks a significant victory for Musk, whose leadership has faced growing scrutiny as Tesla grapples with slowing demand, shrinking market share, and tighter competition in the global electric vehicle market.

Just days before the vote, European sales data revealed that Tesla’s car deliveries plunged again last month, including a 50% drop in Germany. Despite these setbacks, many investors continue to view Musk as a visionary capable of transforming entire industries—an image reinforced by his past success in turning Tesla from a near-bankrupt company into one of the world’s most valuable automakers.

Still, critics argue that the board’s decision reflects an excessive dependence on Musk’s leadership. Large institutional investors such as CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, and Norway’s sovereign wealth fund voted against the package, citing concerns about corporate governance and executive overreach.

Ambitious Goals Tied to Massive Reward

Musk’s pay plan, first approved in 2018, ties his compensation entirely to Tesla’s performance. To receive the full payout, Musk must increase the company’s market capitalization to nearly six times its current value, deliver 20 million electric vehicles over the next decade, and deploy 1 million humanoid robots — a project Musk claims could revolutionize work and home life.

The goals are among the most ambitious in corporate history. Achieving even part of them could earn Musk tens of billions of dollars in newly issued stock options along the way, steadily increasing his ownership stake.

According to Forbes, Musk’s net worth currently stands at approximately $493 billion, putting him ahead of every other living billionaire but still below historical figures like industrialist John D. Rockefeller, whose wealth peaked at an inflation-adjusted $630 billion.

Board and Watchdogs Divided Over Governance

The compensation plan has divided both investors and governance experts. Proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis both urged shareholders to reject the deal, calling it “excessive” and pointing to the board’s close ties to Musk. In response, Musk lashed out at the firms, labeling them “corporate terrorists.”

Critics such as automotive analyst Sam Abuelsamid from Telemetry Research argue that the package is unjustified. “He already has hundreds of billions tied up in Tesla,” Abuelsamid said. “To say he needs another trillion to stay motivated is absurd.”

However, supporters contend that the package aligns Musk’s personal ambitions with shareholder interests. Dan Ives, a financial analyst at Wedbush Securities, described the vote as “a massive win for shareholders,” adding, “This AI chapter needs one person to lead it — and that’s Musk.”

The AI Future of Tesla

Musk has long emphasized that Tesla’s future lies not only in electric vehicles but also in artificial intelligence. The company is developing self-driving software capable of operating vehicles without steering wheels and humanoid robots intended for both industrial and domestic use.

Supporters believe this next stage of development could redefine Tesla as an AI and robotics company, rather than merely an automaker. For Musk, the approval of the compensation plan reinforces his authority to steer the company through that transformation.

Musk told investors the package was “not about the money” but about increasing his stake in Tesla to nearly 30%, giving him greater control over the company’s strategic direction. He has also said that he wants more influence over Tesla’s AI and robotics operations to ensure they are managed responsibly, citing potential “dangers to humanity” if misused.

Shareholder Decisions Beyond Musk’s Pay

In addition to approving Musk’s pay deal, Tesla shareholders passed several other resolutions favorable to the CEO. They voted to allow the company to invest in Musk’s artificial intelligence startup, xAI, which is developing large-scale generative AI systems designed to compete with models from OpenAI and Google.

However, shareholders rejected a proposal that would have made it easier for investors to sue Tesla by lowering the minimum ownership threshold for legal action. The current rule, which remains in place, requires investors to hold at least a 3% stake to bring a case.

Tesla shares rose briefly in after-hours trading following the vote, reaching $445.44, before stabilizing. The company’s stock is up roughly 80% over the past year, reflecting both investor optimism and volatility tied to Musk’s leadership.

Outlook: High Stakes for Tesla and Musk

With the shareholder approval secured, Musk faces the challenge of delivering on his bold promises. Analysts note that while the plan could unlock historic wealth for Musk, it also places immense pressure on Tesla to maintain growth amid slowing global demand for electric vehicles and intensifying competition from Chinese and European automakers.

If Musk succeeds, he could become the world’s first trillionaire — and cement his status as one of the most transformative figures in modern corporate history. If not, the vote may be remembered as one of the most audacious gambles ever made by investors in pursuit of innovation.

Source: AP News – Musk could become history’s first trillionaire as Tesla shareholders approve giant pay package

The post Elon Musk Poised to Become World’s First Trillionaire as Tesla Shareholders Approve Record Pay Package appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Falling Profits Overshadow Record Sales

Tesla’s third-quarter adjusted income dropped 29% year-over-year to $1.8 billion, while net income tumbled 37%. Even with record sales of nearly 500,000 vehicles, earnings missed analysts’ forecasts, sending shares down more than 3% in after-hours trading.

The drop in profits came despite strong demand in the quarter, largely fueled by U.S. customers rushing to purchase electric vehicles before a $7,500 federal tax credit expired on October 1.

Tax Credit Expiration Expected to Slow Sales

Analysts warn that Tesla’s fourth-quarter results could take a hit as demand softens. Many customers who planned to buy later in the year advanced their purchases to benefit from the tax incentive. The company, which generates nearly half its revenue in the U.S., could face slower domestic sales in the coming months.

Tesla also continues to lose ground globally to Chinese EV competitors. BYD, which dominates China’s electric vehicle market, is on track to surpass Tesla as the world’s top EV seller this year, even without selling in the United States.

Regulatory Credit Sales Plunge

A major source of Tesla’s past profits—regulatory credit sales—has been sharply reduced by recent U.S. policy changes. The Trump administration’s tax and spending bill eliminated federal penalties for exceeding emissions limits, erasing much of the demand for credits from automakers.

Tesla reported $417 million in credit sales in the third quarter, down $322 million from the same period last year. These credits have generated $11.4 billion for Tesla since 2019 and were often the difference between profit and loss in previous years.

Investors Unimpressed by Future-Focused Vision

During Wednesday’s investor call, Musk and CFO Vaibhav Taneja devoted most of their discussion to Tesla’s self-driving technology, robotaxi ambitions, and humanoid robots rather than financial results.

Musk said the company expects its robotaxi service to operate in 8–10 U.S. metropolitan areas by the end of the year—down from his July projection of reaching half the U.S. population. Production of the Cybercab, Tesla’s steering-wheel-free autonomous vehicle, is scheduled to begin in mid-2026, with safety drivers still required during the early rollout phase.

Tesla is also preparing production lines for its Optimus humanoid robot, though no launch date was announced.

Musk’s $1 Trillion Pay Package Sparks Debate

The call also marked Musk’s first public comments since Tesla proposed a new CEO compensation plan worth up to $1 trillion in stock. Shareholders are set to vote on the package at next month’s annual meeting.

“It’s not like I’m going to go spend the money,” Musk said. “I just think there needs to be enough voting control to give us strong influence—but not so much that I can’t be fired if I go insane.”

Market Reaction

Tesla’s shares fell more than 3% after the earnings call, reflecting investor concerns over falling profits, declining regulatory credits, and slowing EV demand. While Tesla’s focus on automation and robotics excites some long-term backers, most analysts agree the near-term outlook remains uncertain.

Source: CNN – Tesla’s best quarter of year isn’t enough to impress investors. Because they know it won’t last

The post Tesla’s Record Quarter Fails to Impress Investors Despite Strong Sales appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: October 8, 2025, 21:45 EDT

Tesla Cuts Prices on Model 3 and Model Y Amid Softening Demand

Tesla has introduced more affordable versions of its popular Model 3 and Model Y electric vehicles in an effort to reignite consumer interest and boost sales after a challenging year for the automaker. However, investor sentiment remained cautious, with shares falling sharply following the announcement.

New Lower-Cost Models Target Budget-Conscious Buyers

The new Model Y variant is priced at just under $40,000, featuring a simplified interior and reduced features compared to its higher-end counterparts. The updated Model 3 now starts below $37,000, with New York residents able to purchase it for under $35,000 after applying state rebates.

Both models are part of Tesla’s strategy to appeal to more cost-sensitive buyers as competition intensifies in the mid-range EV market. The move comes amid increasing pressure from global rivals such as Hyundai, Ford, and General Motors, which have introduced competitively priced models with similar performance ranges.

Analysts Say Market Reaction Highlights Investor Concerns

Despite the new releases, Tesla’s stock dropped 4.5% to $443.09 on Tuesday, erasing gains from the previous day’s trading. Analysts said the market’s reaction reflected skepticism about whether the new models would meaningfully lift sales or investor confidence.

“Investors were looking for something truly different, not another iteration of an existing product,” said Ivan Drury, an automotive analyst at Edmunds, noting that the company’s lineup has seen limited innovation in recent years. “It’s unlikely this will bring performance levels back to where they want them.”

Reduced Features Reflect a Trade-Off for Affordability

The new Model Y comes with a 321-mile driving range, slightly lower than previous versions, and features fewer audio speakers, a fabric interior instead of microsuede, and no panoramic glass roof or second-row touchscreen.

Similarly, the lower-cost Model 3 version sacrifices range and interior amenities, including ambient lighting and premium materials, to achieve its reduced price point.

While the cuts make Tesla’s vehicles more accessible, they also position the company in direct competition with Ford’s Mustang Mach-E, Chevrolet’s Equinox EV, and Hyundai’s Ioniq 5, all of which offer models in the $35,000–$45,000 price range.

EV Incentives and Demand Trends Affect Sales Outlook

Tesla’s timing coincides with the recent expiration of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit for certain electric vehicles, a factor analysts believe could dampen demand in the near term.

The automaker has long discussed developing a $25,000 entry-level EV to attract mainstream buyers, but the newly released “standard” versions remain well above that target. Industry observers suggest Tesla may face additional pressure as consumers weigh cost, range, and available incentives before committing to a purchase.

Industry Competition Intensifies as Tesla Faces Headwinds

The launch underscores Tesla’s need to adapt to a rapidly evolving market. With Chinese and South Korean automakers ramping up global exports and offering competitive pricing, Tesla’s once-dominant position is being tested.

According to Reuters and Bloomberg, global EV sales growth has slowed in 2025 due to high interest rates, reduced subsidies, and increased supply chain costs. Tesla’s focus on affordability could help retain market share, but analysts warn it may also squeeze margins.

“Tesla’s challenge is balancing profitability with accessibility,” said one industry analyst. “Cheaper models may boost volume, but the trade-off could limit earnings growth.”

Looking Ahead: Can Lower Prices Revive Tesla’s Momentum?

As Tesla works to regain momentum, the success of these new models will depend on how effectively they attract new buyers without eroding the brand’s premium appeal.

While lower prices could improve short-term demand, analysts note that sustainable growth will require continued innovation—particularly in battery technology, software, and manufacturing efficiency.

For now, Tesla’s move signals a tactical shift toward affordability as it navigates a more crowded, cost-sensitive global EV landscape.

Source: AP News – Tesla offers cheaper versions of 2 electric vehicles in bid to win back market share in tough year

The post Tesla Launches Cheaper Model 3 and Model Y to Revive Slowing EV Sales appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Tesla Inc. has awarded CEO Elon Musk a new stock grant worth approximately $29 billion, aiming to retain his leadership despite recent challenges to the company’s performance and growing investor scrutiny. The grant comes as Tesla navigates declining profits, increased competition, and political controversy surrounding Musk’s public affiliations.

Tesla Reinstates Compensation After Court Setback

In a regulatory filing on Monday, Tesla announced that it had granted Musk 96 million restricted shares as a “first step” to acknowledging his role in driving the company’s value and transformation since 2018.

The award follows a legal setback earlier this year when a Delaware court struck down Musk’s original 2018 compensation package. Delaware Chancellor Kathleen St. Jude McCormick ruled that the original deal — potentially worth $56 billion — was improperly structured due to Musk’s outsized influence and the lack of independence among Tesla’s board members during negotiations.

Tesla has since appealed the ruling and said the new grant is part of an ongoing effort to align Musk’s interests with long-term shareholder value.

“Rewarding Elon for what he has done and continues to do for Tesla is the right thing to do,” the company said, citing a $735 billion increase in market capitalization since 2018.

Shareholders Divided as Company Faces Growing Challenges

The new stock grant comes at a time when Tesla is under significant pressure. The company’s stock has declined nearly 25% year-to-date, reflecting growing concern over Musk’s political involvement and Tesla’s declining financial performance.

In its most recent quarterly earnings report, Tesla posted a steep drop in profit — from $1.39 billion to $409 million — and missed revenue expectations, further fueling investor anxiety.

Competition is also intensifying, with traditional automakers ramping up electric vehicle production and Chinese EV companies capturing larger shares of the global market.

Political Ties and Management Focus Raise Concerns

Musk’s increasing involvement in national politics, particularly his alignment with former President Donald Trump’s administration and conservative causes, has sparked controversy and impacted Tesla’s public image.

Several analysts and investors have voiced concerns about Musk’s focus being split across Tesla, SpaceX, his AI venture xAI, and political advocacy.

Dan Ives, a technology analyst at Wedbush Securities, acknowledged the concerns but believes the new compensation package may help stabilize investor sentiment:

“We believe this grant will now keep Musk as CEO of Tesla at least until 2030 and removes an overhang on the stock,” Ives said. “Musk remains Tesla’s big asset and this comp issue has been a constant concern of shareholders once the Delaware soap opera began.”

Terms of the New Stock Grant

According to the filing, Musk will be required to pay $23.34 per share when the restricted stock vests — the same exercise price outlined in the voided 2018 package. While the grant is significant, it is also structured to ensure performance-based rewards, echoing the goals of the original compensation deal.

The timing of the award also reflects Tesla’s efforts to keep Musk from being distracted or removed by shareholder activists. Musk recently stated that increasing his control over the company is essential to maintaining stability and ensuring Tesla’s future direction.

Shareholders Push for Transparency

Amid these developments, a coalition of more than 20 shareholders sent a letter to Tesla urging the company to maintain transparency and accountability. They noted the continued decline in Tesla’s stock price and called for proper notice of the upcoming annual shareholders meeting, which is now scheduled for November in compliance with Texas corporate law.

Tesla’s move to award the new grant just months ahead of the meeting could be an attempt to mitigate tension with investors ahead of potential votes on executive pay and board governance.

Musk’s Role Remains Central to Tesla’s Future

Despite the controversy, Musk remains one of the most influential figures in the tech and automotive industries. His leadership is closely tied to Tesla’s identity and innovation efforts — from self-driving technology to battery development and global expansion.

While legal and investor scrutiny may continue, Tesla appears committed to securing Musk’s presence at the helm through the end of the decade.

Source: AP News – Tesla awards CEO Musk millions of shares valued at about $29 billion

The post Tesla Awards Elon Musk $29 Billion in Stock Amid Profit Drop appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

“This is a factory built by humans but run by robots,” Burtynsky said in a recent Zoom call. “I think it’s a foreshadowing of where our future is.”

This high-tech, highly automated facility belongs to BYD, China’s leading EV manufacturer and Tesla’s fiercest global rival. In 2024 alone, BYD delivered 4.27 million vehicles—including 1.76 million electric and around 2.5 million hybrid cars—outpacing Tesla in total output.

A Factory With No Faces

Burtynsky, known for his haunting images of labor and industry, was granted access to BYD’s Changzhou plant through a personal connection with British architect Sir Norman Foster. Foster was guest-editing Domus magazine and wanted a compelling image to represent the future of transportation.

What Burtynsky found was a factory unlike those he had photographed in China during the 2000s—images that showed endless rows of workers building the country’s economic rise. This time, the workers were gone. Or nearly so.

“The humans are really just there to maintain the robots and keep the programs running clean,” he explained. In some corners of the facility, the level of automation is so complete, the factory could run without lights—a so-called “dark factory.”

It’s a stark contrast to the past, but also a reflection of BYD’s edge: automation drives down production costs, allowing it to offer EVs like the Seagull at just $10,000—a third of what Tesla charges for its base Model 3 in China.

A Powerful Image of Change

The standout image from his visit—titled “BYD Manufacturing Facility #1”—is visually hypnotic. It shows an unfinished vehicle on a production line, surrounded by towering steel beams that vanish into the distance, creating an almost spiritual symmetry.

“It had a cathedral-esque quality,” Burtynsky recalled.

But he also sees the image as part of a much larger narrative—one that stretches far beyond China’s borders.

From China to Africa: The New Face of Globalization

The photo is part of a larger series Burtynsky calls “China in Africa,” now on view at Hong Kong’s Flowers Gallery. The project explores what he sees as the next phase of globalization. Alongside ultra-modern factories in China, he juxtaposes Chinese-owned infrastructure in African nations—rail crossings, warehouses, and textile factories in places like Ethiopia.

The takeaway? While China’s factories have become more automated, the human labor hasn’t disappeared—it’s moved.

“They have literally secured their complete supply chain,” he said, pointing to BYD’s reported investments in lithium mines and mineral rights in countries like Brazil. It’s what Burtynsky describes as “complete vertical integration,” from raw materials to finished products.

A Complex Portrait of Progress

Burtynsky’s work often balances on the edge of awe and unease. Known for large-scale, aerial shots of landscapes transformed by human industry—like copper mines and salt flats—he doesn’t claim to take sides.

“I do it in a sort of deadpan aesthetic,” he said. “I’m not trying to manipulate you.”

His images aren’t designed to be moral judgments, but they do raise big questions. Take automation: is it dystopian, or simply efficient? Electric vehicles may be resource-intensive to build, but they also represent a step toward reducing fossil fuel dependence.

And as Burtynsky points out, not all jobs lost to automation are worth mourning. Before becoming a full-time photographer, he worked in car factories himself.

“You feel like you’re part of the machine,” he recalled. “You’re just being used for your human energy because they haven’t yet found a machine that can do what you’re doing.”

Finding Humanity in Machines

While the BYD plant might lack human workers, it’s not entirely devoid of human touch. In his photos, Burtynsky encourages viewers to look closer—at a grease stain on the factory floor, or a splash of oil on a pristine wall. These tiny imperfections, he says, are what ground the scene in reality.

“I’m always trying to point my camera into worlds we’re not all that familiar with,” he said. “And invite the kind of scrutiny that only a large format print can offer.”

In a world increasingly shaped by automation, Burtynsky’s lens doesn’t just document what’s changing—it asks us to consider what we’re leaving behind.

Source: CNN – Photographer finds surreal beauty — and few humans — inside a Chinese EV factory

The post Inside China’s Robot-Run EV Factory: No Workers, Just Machines appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.