The figure offers a view of how often labels clearly document an all-analog production chain in PressPick’s catalog. It does not establish that only 0.7% of all vinyl reissues worldwide are all-analog.

That distinction matters to collectors who pay more for specialist editions and want to know how a record was made. A vinyl record may begin with an original analog master tape but pass through a digital stage before the cutting lathe creates the grooves.

PressPick counts a pressing as all-analog only when the documentation for that specific edition explicitly uses terms such as “all-analog,” “all analog” or “AAA.” The phrase “cut from the original master tapes” does not meet that standard on its own.

What the 0.7% figure measures

PressPick’s report lists 130 all-analog pressings across 96 albums. It says these account for 0.7% of the reissues tracked in its catalog. The snapshot is dated October 22, 2026, and the figures may change as the database grows.

The key word is tracked. PressPick is counting documented editions in its own catalog, not every new vinyl release sold by labels, shops or distributors.

The database uses publicly documented release information. It compares details such as the label, catalog number, release year, barcode, mastering engineer, pressing plant and matrix or runout markings. These details help distinguish editions that share the same album title but may have different production histories.

PressPick also sets a strict rule for classifying an edition as all-analog. Its documentation must explicitly identify the production chain as AAA or all-analog. A broad label claim or the reputation of a reissue series is not enough unless the relevant wording appears in the documentation for that edition.

This approach creates a clear threshold for inclusion. It also means the count depends on what labels and other sources have documented and what PressPick has recorded.

What the figure cannot tell us

The 0.7% result is not a global market-share estimate. It does not tell us what proportion of all vinyl reissues released in 2026—or across all years—used an all-analog mastering chain.

Nor does it show that the other 99.3% were digitally mastered. Some editions may use digital transfers. Others may have incomplete production information, leaving their mastering chain unconfirmed.

PressPick says it leaves missing information marked as “not listed” rather than filling gaps with assumptions. It also says it regularly rechecks entries and uses specific identifiers to distinguish similar editions.

That makes an undocumented pressing different from a confirmed digital one. The absence of an AAA claim in a product description is not proof that a digital step occurred. It means the available documentation does not satisfy PressPick’s stated test.

The distinction also limits what the number can say about labels. A label may have a well-documented all-analog series, but individual editions can differ in source material, mastering and production. The report’s count cannot establish the full output of a label or the production method used for every record it releases.

What AAA mastering means

AAA is shorthand for an all-analog production chain. In a conventional all-analog reissue, the audio remains in analog form from the source tape through mastering and cutting to the lacquer used to manufacture records.

A simplified production path looks like this:

A digital step changes that chain. A label might transfer an analog master tape into a digital file, process that file, and then use it to cut the lacquer. The finished product is still a vinyl record, but its mastering chain is not fully analog.

The distinction is not a judgment about whether the record sounds good. It describes how the audio was transferred and processed before pressing.

Digital transfers and DSD are not the same as AAA

DSD, or Direct Stream Digital, is a digital audio format. A record can be sourced from an original analog master tape and still use a DSD transfer during mastering.

That is why a statement such as “sourced from the original master tapes” may be accurate without confirming that the entire chain remained analog. The wording identifies the source, but it does not necessarily explain every step between the tape and the cutting lathe.

Half-speed mastering is different again. It describes the speed at which the source and cutting lathe operate during the cutting process. Abbey Road Studios explains that the source is played and the lathe runs at half the normal rate. The method can be used with different source formats, including analog and digital material.

A record described as half-speed mastered is therefore not automatically AAA. The half-speed label tells buyers about the cutting technique, not whether a digital transfer occurred earlier in the chain.

The same distinction applies to pressing quality. A record may have excellent mastering but suffer from surface noise, off-centre pressing or other manufacturing defects. Conversely, a clean, well-pressed record can still use a digital source. Mastering chain and pressing quality are separate parts of the product.

Blue Note’s Tone Poet series shows why edition details matter

Labels sometimes publish more detailed production information than a generic product listing provides.

Blue Note Records says its Tone Poet audiophile reissue series is mastered all-analog directly from original master tapes by Kevin Gray of Cohearent Audio and pressed on 180-gram vinyl at Record Technology Inc. The label published that description in its announcement of the 2026 series.

Blue Note also published edition-specific details for its three-LP Tone Poet release of Kenny Dorham’s The Complete ‘Round About Midnight at the Cafe Bohemia. The label said the set was cut directly from Rudy Van Gelder’s original master tapes by Gray and pressed on 180-gram vinyl at RTI.

These statements provide more information than a simple “audiophile vinyl” label. They identify the source material, mastering engineer and pressing plant, while the edition-specific description explicitly states that the set is all-analog.

However, a statement about a series should not automatically be applied to every release from the same label. Collectors should check the exact edition they intend to buy, especially when a title has appeared in multiple formats, editions or reissue programmed.

The comparison also illustrates the difference between what a label documents and what a database records. A documented edition can meet a label’s stated production description, but it may not appear in a catalog’s all-analog count if the catalog’s specific inclusion rule is not met by the information attached to that entry.

The Mobile Fidelity controversy changed the conversation

The debate over production transparency became more prominent in 2022, when customers questioned Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab about digital processing in records marketed using terms including “Original Master Recording” and “Ultradisc One-Step.”

On July 27, 2022, Mobile Fidelity president Jim Davis issued a statement acknowledging customer concerns about the use of digital technology in the company’s mastering chain. Davis apologized for vague language and said the company would provide clearer information about the provenance of its products.

The issue also led to litigation. In Tuttle et al. v. Audiophile Music Direct Inc., a US federal court considered a proposed class-action settlement involving records marketed under the “Original Master Recording” and “Ultradisc One-Step” descriptions that had used a DSD transfer in their mastering chain. The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement in May 2023. <

The case concerned the products and claims covered by the litigation. It should not be treated as evidence that all audiophile labels use digital transfers without disclosure, or that all digitally mastered vinyl is misrepresented.

Its broader relevance is the importance of clear language. Collectors need to know whether a product description refers to the original source, the mastering method, the cutting process or the finished pressing. Those are related but different facts.

Does all-analog guarantee better sound?

No. The 0.7% statistic measures a documented production characteristic, not sound quality.

An all-analog chain may be important to a collector who wants to hear a record without an intervening digital transfer. But the final sound also depends on the condition of the source tape, the mastering engineer’s decisions, the quality of the cutting, the pressing plant and the playback equipment.

Digital processing does not automatically make a record inferior. A careful digital transfer and well-executed mastering can produce a record that listeners enjoy. An all-analog chain, meanwhile, cannot correct every problem in a worn source tape or guarantee a quiet, accurately pressed disc.

PressPick itself says its manufacturing signals are not a ranking of sound quality. It presents edition details so buyers can compare releases rather than declaring one production method or pressing the universal winner.

Collectors can therefore separate two questions: Was this record made using the production chain the label describes? And Do I prefer how this edition sounds? The first calls for documentation. The second requires listening and comparison.

How collectors can check a specific edition

Buyers can take several practical steps before paying a premium for an all-analog reissue.

1. Identify the exact edition. Check the catalog number, barcode, release year and format. The same album title can refer to different editions with different sources or mastering chains.

2. Read the full product description. Look for an explicit statement that the specific edition is all-analog or AAA. “From the original master tapes” is useful information, but it does not alone confirm that no digital transfer occurred.

3. Check the mastering credits. The mastering engineer’s name can help identify the edition and locate additional documentation. A credit alone does not establish the complete signal chain.

4. Check the runout markings. The matrix or runout area can identify a cut or pressing. PressPick treats such identifiers as more specific evidence than a general album title or label name. But a mastering engineer’s initials in the runout do not, by themselves, prove that the cut was made directly from analog tape.

5. Look for edition-specific statements. Official label pages, technical notes and release inserts may provide details about source tapes, transfers and cutting. If the label only describes the series in general terms, ask whether the claim applies to the exact pressing.

6. Treat missing information as unknown. If the full chain is not documented, do not assume it was digital—or all-analog. The honest conclusion is that the available evidence does not establish the answer.

The bigger issue is transparency

PressPick’s 0.7% figure is a useful snapshot of how many tracked reissues meet its strict documentation rule. It is not a verdict on the entire vinyl industry, and it does not show that nearly every other reissue uses digital mastering.

The report also cannot establish that the documented all-analog editions sound better than the rest. It measures what the catalog can identify from the available edition-level information.

For collectors, the central lesson is to look beyond the album title, the weight of the vinyl and the reputation of the label. A useful product description should tell buyers what source was used, how the mastering chain worked and which edition those details describe.

The more clearly labels document those steps, the easier it becomes for collectors to make informed choices. Until that information is consistent, the share of documented AAA pressings will remain a measure of what the catalog can verify—not a complete account of how today’s vinyl is made.

Reporting Credit: PressPick — October 22, 2026, live report on all-analog vinyl reissues and its published editorial standards for edition identification and classification. Blue Note Records — official 2026 Tone Poet series announcement and edition-specific production details for Kenny Dorham’s The Complete ‘Round About Midnight at the Cafe Bohemia. Abbey Road Studios — technical explanation of half-speed mastering. Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab — July 27, 2022, statement on its mastering process and commitment to clearer product-provenance information. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington — May 9, 2023, preliminary approval order in Tuttle et al. v. Audiophile Music Direct Inc.

The post How Much of Today’s Vinyl Is Truly All-Analog? PressPick Puts the Figure at 0.7% appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The 2026 Sound+Image Awards, announced this year after testing and reviewing a wide range of audio and audiovisual equipment, included dedicated categories for streamers, wireless headphones, true-wireless earbuds and streaming systems alongside traditional turntables, amplifiers and loudspeakers.

That combination reflects a broader shift in consumer audio. Modern systems increasingly remove the need for physical media and complicated connections while continuing to compete on the quality of the sound they produce.

Streaming has become part of hi-fi

The distinction between conventional hi-fi equipment and streaming devices has steadily narrowed.

The 2026 awards recognized the Silent Angel Bremen SL1 Plus as streamer of the year and the Aurender A1000 as streamer/DAC of the year. The Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin Pro and Denon CEOL N12 were also recognized in streaming-system categories.

These products illustrate how streaming has moved from being an add-on feature to becoming part of the central architecture of home audio.

A modern listener can access music services, personal digital libraries and other sources through a single system without necessarily giving up the components traditionally associated with higher-quality playback.

The result is a different definition of convenience. The goal is no longer simply to make music easier to access; manufacturers increasingly compete on whether that convenience can coexist with satisfying sound.

Wireless does not necessarily mean basic audio

Wireless listening has also expanded beyond inexpensive portable speakers and basic Bluetooth headphones.

The 2026 awards included separate categories for wireless headphones, true-wireless earbuds and other wireless products. Bowers & Wilkins’ Px8 S2, Apple’s AirPods Max 2 and Nothing’s Ear (3) were among the recognized products.

Newer wireless standards are also opening additional possibilities. Sound+Image reported on the use of Auracast in products such as Sennheiser’s RS 275 TV headphones, pointing toward a future in which wireless audio can serve more specialized listening environments as well as casual personal use.

Wireless technology therefore increasingly concerns not only whether audio can be transmitted without a cable, but how reliably and effectively that audio can be delivered to the listener.

Sound quality remains a product differentiator

The continued presence of sound quality as an explicit judging criterion is significant because streaming has made access to music almost effortless.

When millions of recordings can be reached from a phone within seconds, the hardware becomes one of the principal variables that listeners can control.

Speakers, headphones, amplifiers, DACs and streaming components determine how that digital signal is ultimately reproduced.

This is one reason traditional categories have not disappeared. The 2026 awards included turntables, phono stages, amplifiers, DACs and loudspeakers alongside wireless and streaming products.

Rather than replacing older forms of hi-fi, digital convenience has largely expanded the range of ways in which people can build an audio system.

The listening experience matters beyond specifications

Audio quality is also not determined by a single specification.

A streaming service can provide high-quality digital files, but the final listening experience depends on the entire playback chain, including the source, digital processing, amplification, speakers or headphones and the environment in which the system is used.

Room acoustics can significantly influence speaker-based listening, while headphone design, fit and tuning can change how a recording is perceived.

That means better sound is not simply a matter of choosing the highest resolution or the most expensive component.

Good system design can matter as much as individual specifications, particularly for listeners trying to improve an existing setup rather than replace everything.

The market is combining convenience and fidelity

The current direction of the audio market is therefore less about streaming versus hi-fi than it is about bringing the two together.

The 2026 awards included products that combine streaming with traditional inputs and playback formats. The Denon CEOL N12, for example, combines HEOS streaming with a CD player, radio, HDMI and phono connectivity.

That approach recognizes that listeners do not necessarily divide themselves into purely digital or traditional camps.

A household may stream most of its music while still owning records, CDs or other physical media. A listener may use wireless headphones during a commute and a conventional stereo system at home.

Manufacturers are increasingly designing around that reality.

Why quality remains relevant

Streaming has changed the economics and convenience of music consumption, but it has not eliminated the basic purpose of an audio system: reproducing recorded sound in a way that listeners find engaging, accurate or enjoyable.

The current product landscape suggests that consumers do not necessarily view convenience and quality as competing priorities.

Instead, the industry’s challenge is to make high-quality listening easier to achieve.

That is why the modern hi-fi market can contain turntables and network streamers, wired headphones and true-wireless earbuds, conventional amplifiers and integrated streaming systems at the same time.

The technology has changed dramatically. The reason for building a good audio system has not.

Reporting Credit: Sound+Image / Australian Hi-Fi — 2026 audio and audiovisual awards, product testing and category results; EISA — 2026–2027 European audio and audiovisual product awards and participating technology publications.

The post Good Sound Still Matters as Streaming and Wireless Audio Expand appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In the United States, vinyl generated $1.04 billion in wholesale revenue during 2025, up 9.3% from the previous year. Unit shipments also increased, rising from 43.4 million to 46.8 million records.

The UK recorded an even stronger percentage increase. BPI reported that vinyl revenue rose 19.9% in 2025 to £174.7 million, its highest level in more than 30 years.

Vinyl Serves a Different Role From Streaming

The growth of records is occurring alongside, rather than in opposition to, a much larger streaming market.

RIAA data shows that streaming generated $9.47 billion in U.S. revenue in 2025, with paid subscriptions contributing $5.88 billion. In the UK, streaming revenue reached £1.07 billion and represented 67.7% of recorded-music revenue, according to BPI.

Those figures place vinyl in a fundamentally different position. Streaming is built around immediate access to large catalogs, while buying a record involves acquiring a physical product that can be played, stored and collected.

For listeners, the distinction extends beyond the delivery method. Playing a record requires selecting the album, handling the disc, placing it on a turntable and eventually turning it over. That process can make listening a more deliberate activity rather than simply another form of background consumption.

The Listening Experience Extends Beyond Sound

Vinyl’s continued growth also complicates a comparison based solely on audio specifications.

Modern digital services can provide lossless and high-resolution audio, allowing suitably equipped listeners to access detailed digital playback without physical media. As digital audio quality has improved, the technical argument for choosing vinyl over streaming has therefore become less straightforward.

The appeal of records can instead involve the complete listening experience. The physical format establishes a dedicated interaction with an album, from handling the sleeve to selecting a side and following the sequence of tracks.

That does not establish vinyl as objectively superior in sound quality. Rather, it highlights that the two formats can satisfy different priorities.

Album Artwork Adds Value to the Physical Format

A record also turns an album into a larger physical object.

The format provides substantially more space for cover artwork, photography and design than a typical digital interface. Special editions can further include colored records, booklets, posters and other physical material, making individual releases more suited to collecting.

That physical presentation has commercial value for labels and artists because it creates products that can be sold as premium versions of releases already available digitally.

Vinyl therefore functions not only as an audio carrier but also as a tangible form of music ownership.

Contemporary Releases Are Driving Demand

The resurgence is also not limited to older listeners or catalog titles.

BPI reported strong vinyl performance from contemporary releases in the UK during 2025. Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl sold more than 147,000 vinyl albums in Britain during the year, the highest annual vinyl total for a new album in the country this century, according to the trade group.

Other leading releases included albums by Olivia Dean, Sabrina Carpenter and Sam Fender.

The sales pattern indicates that vinyl remains part of the current release market rather than functioning exclusively as a format for reissues and older catalogs.

Vinyl’s Share of Physical Music Is Rising

The growing contribution from new releases is significant because it shows how the physical market itself is changing.

In the UK, vinyl accounted for 62.9% of physical-music revenue in 2025, compared with 59.1% in 2024. In the United States, vinyl revenue rose 9.3% while CD revenue declined 7.8%; total physical-music revenue nevertheless increased 5%.

The contrasting performance suggests that vinyl is increasingly carrying the physical side of the recorded-music market, even as streaming remains the industry’s dominant revenue source overall.

A Premium Physical Format

The economics of the two formats are also fundamentally different.

Streaming distributes access across a large catalog through recurring subscriptions, while physical music generates revenue through individual product sales. Records can therefore support higher-value purchases involving packaging, special editions and collectible elements that are not part of a standard streaming subscription.

This helps explain why vinyl can continue growing without challenging streaming for overall market dominance.

A listener may use streaming for discovery and convenience while purchasing a physical copy of an album that has particular personal or collecting value. The two formats can consequently participate in the same consumer journey rather than serving as mutually exclusive choices.

Vinyl’s Resurgence Has Become Established

The duration of the growth is another important part of the trend.

According to the RIAA, U.S. vinyl sales have recorded 19 consecutive years of growth. The format exceeded $1 billion in U.S. revenue in 2025, while the broader physical-music market also recorded growth.

The UK market provides a similar indication of sustained demand, with vinyl revenue reaching its highest point in more than three decades after another substantial annual increase.

The data does not suggest that vinyl is displacing streaming. Instead, it points to a durable role for physical records within a recorded-music market overwhelmingly organized around digital access.

Two Formats, Different Listening Priorities

Streaming and vinyl ultimately address different aspects of music consumption.

Streaming emphasizes breadth, immediacy and convenience. Vinyl emphasizes physical ownership, album presentation, collecting and a more deliberate interaction with recorded music.

For Hi-Fi listeners, that distinction is important because the choice of format is not necessarily a straightforward assessment of which technology delivers the highest technical specifications. It can also reflect how listeners want to engage with music and with the equipment used to reproduce it.

The continued rise in vinyl sales suggests that those physical and experiential qualities retain measurable commercial value.

Vinyl’s significance today is therefore less about defeating streaming than about occupying a part of the listening experience that streaming was never designed to replace. Its growth alongside increasingly capable digital audio demonstrates that convenience and physical ownership can remain complementary parts of modern music consumption.

Reporting Credit: Recording Industry Association of America; British Phonographic Industry.

The post Vinyl Sales Keep Growing as Streaming Dominates Recorded Music appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The company announced the change Aug. 11 as part of its broader Artist Identity & Trust initiative. Spotify said the policy responds to concerns from listeners who may initially believe an artist profile represents a human before discovering that the identity is artificially generated.

The new system focuses on artist identity, not whether artificial intelligence was used to create the music. Spotify said artists can continue using AI in songwriting, production and other creative processes without automatically being classified as AI Personas.

AI Persona profiles will be excluded from recommendations

Spotify said music from profiles designated as AI Personas will not be included in its editorial or algorithmic recommendations by default.

However, listeners who already follow an AI Persona may continue to receive its music. Spotify said the approach is intended to prioritize what it describes as authentic artists while still allowing artists flexibility in how they create and present their work.

The company did not say that AI Persona music would be removed from Spotify. Instead, the main change concerns how that music is surfaced through discovery and recommendation systems.

Spotify will combine disclosure with profile reviews

Artists can disclose through Spotify for Artists that their profile represents an AI Persona. Spotify said it hopes artists will provide the information voluntarily but will also conduct its own reviews.

The company plans to examine profiles whose names, images or other public-facing elements appear to represent photorealistic AI-generated identities. Spotify said its initial reviews will focus on profiles that meet certain audience thresholds.

Beginning in mid-September, the badge is expected to appear in several areas, including artist profile banners, About sections, Search and track rows within playlists.

Listeners who select the badge will be able to see whether the artist disclosed the AI Persona status or whether Spotify identified the profile through its own review.

Artists whose profiles receive a badge after a Spotify review will be notified. They will have an opportunity to disclose their status or appeal the decision.

Spotify also plans to introduce a reporting system that will allow listeners to flag profiles they believe represent AI Personas for review.

AI-assisted music remains a separate issue

Spotify is drawing a clear line between who an artist appears to be and how a song was created.

An artist can use AI for elements such as vocals, lyrics, instrumentation or production without becoming an AI Persona. Spotify has previously introduced AI Credits to give artists and rights holders a way to disclose AI’s role in individual recordings.

That distinction is important because AI use in music has become increasingly broad. Spotify has said its goal is not to treat all AI-assisted music as inherently deceptive or to penalize artists for using AI responsibly.

Instead, the AI Persona system addresses cases where the artist identity itself may mislead listeners about whether a real person is behind the profile.

New policy builds on Spotify’s identity system

The AI Persona badge follows other identity and transparency measures Spotify introduced this year.

In April, Spotify launched Verified by Spotify, a badge for artist profiles that meet its standards for authenticity and trust. The company said its initial verification effort was designed to cover more than 99% of the artists that listeners actively search for, representing hundreds of thousands of artists.

Spotify has also introduced Artist Profile Protection and additional artist information intended to give listeners more context about the people behind the music. The company has separately developed SongDNA and AI Credits to provide greater information about contributors and the production process.

The company has also been developing systems to combat impersonation and music spam. Spotify said in 2025 that it was strengthening protections against unauthorized AI voice impersonation and developing systems to identify and limit spam and low-quality mass-uploaded content.

Together, the measures point toward a broader effort to distinguish authentic artist identities from synthetic or misleading profiles while allowing legitimate use of AI as a creative tool.

Spotify said its approach will continue to evolve as AI changes the music industry and as it receives feedback from artists, listeners and industry partners.

Reporting credit: Spotify Newsroom.

This JournosNews report is based on information released by Spotify as part of its Artist Identity & Trust initiative, supplemented by Spotify’s earlier public disclosures on artist verification and AI transparency.

The post Spotify to Label AI Personas and Limit Their Recommendation Reach appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The project, known as Stylus Wear Study 3 (SWS3), followed a single Audio-Technica AT-VM95ML MicroLine stylus through hundreds of hours of normal playback. Researcher Ray Parkhurst documented the project on the Vinyl Engine forum, combining microscope imaging with repeated harmonic-distortion measurements to monitor how the stylus changed over time.

Unlike many earlier investigations that evaluated stylus condition only after testing had concluded, SWS3 recorded physical wear and electrical measurements throughout the experiment. The continuous approach allowed changes to be tracked as playback hours accumulated. Testing ended after approximately 672 hours when wear to the reference records became significant enough to compromise further measurements.

Measurements Suggested Progressive Wear

According to the published findings, measurable changes appeared relatively early in the test.

Second-harmonic distortion at 6 kHz increased by approximately 8 decibels after about 200 hours of playback. Around the 300-hour mark, Parkhurst reported that the stylus began contacting the bottom of some record grooves. By roughly 400 hours, microscope images showed noticeably greater accumulations of vinyl debris.

At the conclusion of the study, the researcher reported evidence of significant groove wear in the test records, including what was described as “furrowing.”

Audio-Technica estimates a service life of approximately 1,000 hours for its MicroLine stylus profile. However, SWS3 did not conclude that every stylus of the same model would experience similar wear at identical playback times. Instead, the findings suggest that factors such as manufacturing tolerances, cartridge alignment, tracking force and record condition may influence stylus lifespan.

Earlier Research Produced Different Lifespan Estimates

The community study adds to decades of stylus wear research that has produced widely varying replacement recommendations.

Harold Weiler’s work during the 1950s documented increasing distortion after several hundred hours of use. Later studies conducted by CBS Laboratories and Shure also found that measurable performance degradation could appear before microscope inspections revealed severe physical wear.

Collectively, those studies illustrate that stylus lifespan has never been defined by a single universally accepted standard.

Some researchers recommended inspecting styli after roughly 500 hours of playback and replacing them between 600 and 800 hours under typical listening conditions. However, stylus profile, tracking force, record cleanliness and playback setup all influenced the results.

Manufacturer recommendations also differ. JICO publishes an approximate 500-hour lifespan for its Micro-Ridge stylus based on a specified distortion threshold, while Audio-Technica recommends about 1,000 hours for its comparable MicroLine profile. Other manufacturers publish longer service-life estimates or recommend shorter inspection intervals depending on operating conditions.

Researchers Urge Caution When Interpreting Results

Despite its detailed methodology, SWS3 has important limitations.

The project evaluated a single stylus operating in one playback system under one set of conditions. As a result, the findings cannot be generalized to all cartridges, tonearms or MicroLine styli.

Parkhurst acknowledged that statistically meaningful conclusions would require testing many more samples because manufacturing variation, cartridge alignment, record condition and tracking accuracy can all influence wear rates.

The study also relied on laboratory measurements rather than listener evaluations during music playback. Consequently, increases in measured distortion do not necessarily indicate that listeners would perceive the same changes during normal listening.

What the Findings Mean for Vinyl Listeners

The study does not establish a universal replacement interval, nor does it demonstrate that every MicroLine stylus will begin damaging records after a specific number of hours.

Instead, it contributes additional evidence to an ongoing discussion about how stylus life should be evaluated and what constitutes the appropriate point for replacement.

For vinyl enthusiasts, the findings suggest that published lifespan ratings may reflect different criteria, including manufacturer specifications, measurable performance changes or thresholds where record wear becomes more likely.

Rather than relying solely on a published service-life estimate, listeners may benefit from tracking playback hours, maintaining proper cartridge alignment and monitoring for increasing sibilance, mistracking or unusual accumulations of vinyl debris. Evaluating multiple indicators may provide a more reliable assessment of stylus condition than any single hour-based guideline.

Because stylus wear depends on tracking force, alignment, record cleanliness, playback conditions and manufacturing variation, no single study can establish a universal replacement interval.

Editorial Note: Stylus Wear Study 3 is an independent community research project and has not been peer-reviewed. Its findings should be interpreted alongside manufacturer guidance and other published stylus wear research.

Sources: Audio-Technica AT-VM95ML User Manual & Technical Specifications; Stylus Wear Study 3 (SWS3), Vinyl Engine; JICO Technical Information; historical stylus wear research by Harold Weiler, CBS Laboratories and Shure.

Aricle Topics: Stylus Wear | Vinyl Records | Audio-Technica | Turntables | Record Care | Audio Engineering | Harmonic Distortion

The post Community Study Challenges Conventional Stylus Lifespan Assumptions appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The discussion has gained attention as archives, record labels, and collectors increasingly digitize aging analog master tapes. While transferring recordings into digital formats addresses physical media degradation, it introduces a different challenge: ensuring those files remain accessible and intact for decades.

Archivists interviewed in recent industry discussions argue that cloud services remain valuable for access and distribution, but many continue to maintain offline copies using Linear Tape-Open (LTO) technology for long-term preservation.

Historic Music Archives Highlight Preservation Challenges

The issue is particularly relevant for large music collections such as the archive maintained by the Grateful Dead organization.

According to comments provided to Jambands.com, archivist David Lemieux still relies on physical tape holdings when production teams require historical recordings. Engineer Jeffrey Norman evaluates tape condition before restoration and mastering work begins on archived performances.

The collection includes hundreds of live recordings spanning multiple decades. Bringing those recordings into modern formats required large-scale tape transfers, high-resolution digitization, and mastering processes designed to preserve historically significant performances.

Brad Serling, founder of nugs.net, described the effort as one of the largest tape-transfer projects undertaken in rock music.

The archive’s survival illustrates a key preservation principle often cited by archivists: physical media stored under controlled conditions can remain accessible across generations, regardless of changes in software platforms, licensing agreements, or technology companies.

Cloud Storage Raises Long-Term Preservation Questions

At a digital preservation workshop held during an international preservation conference, participants outlined several unresolved concerns surrounding exclusive reliance on cloud storage.

Among the issues discussed were the difficulty of independently verifying whether cloud copies stored across different regions are truly isolated, challenges associated with validating data integrity without relying on vendor-provided tools, and uncertainty surrounding data retrieval costs.

Digital preservation researcher David Rosenthal previously examined cloud archive economics and reported that retrieval fees can become substantial when organizations need to recover large collections or periodically verify stored data.

Archivists also note that durability claims published by cloud providers primarily address hardware reliability. They do not necessarily account for risks associated with software errors, human mistakes, malicious actions, or organizational decisions that may affect data availability.

Service Closures Demonstrate Additional Risks

Several high-profile platform shutdowns are frequently cited within preservation circles as examples of long-term uncertainty.

MySpace confirmed in 2019 that music uploaded between 2003 and 2015 was no longer accessible following a server migration. Technologist Andy Baio estimated that approximately 50 million songs from around 14 million artists were affected.

Google Play Music ceased operations in 2020, with remaining user data deleted after migration deadlines expired. Ultraviolet, a cloud-based digital media locker supported by major entertainment companies, also shut down after serving millions of users.

Archivists often reference such examples to illustrate that access to cloud-hosted collections ultimately depends on the continued operation of the underlying service.

LTO Tape Continues to Evolve

Despite perceptions that tape storage belongs to an earlier era of computing, the format continues to receive new development.

According to information cited in the report, Fujifilm began shipping LTO-10 cartridges in early 2026. The format offers 40TB of native storage capacity and up to 100TB of compressed capacity, increasing available storage compared with previous generations.

Industry shipment data also indicates continued demand for the format. LTO technology remains widely used by organizations responsible for preserving large datasets, including media archives and enterprise data centers.

Cost is another factor cited by preservation professionals. LTO cartridges involve an upfront hardware and media purchase, whereas cloud storage typically operates through recurring subscription and retrieval fees.

A further advantage is physical isolation. Once removed from a tape drive, cartridges remain disconnected from networks, reducing exposure to ransomware attacks, service outages, and policy changes affecting online platforms.

Preservation Strategies Increasingly Combine Multiple Technologies

Industry analysts increasingly frame the debate as a question of balance rather than replacement.

According to comments cited from IDC, organizations are adopting storage strategies based on business requirements rather than choosing exclusively between cloud and tape infrastructure.

In practice, cloud platforms often support accessibility, collaboration, and distribution, while offline tape copies serve as long-term preservation assets.

For music collectors and audiophiles maintaining personal libraries, archivists recommend a similar approach. Local backups, exported library files, and multiple storage locations can reduce dependence on any single service or platform.

Long-Term Preservation Remains a Human Challenge

The discussion ultimately extends beyond technology.

Research cited from Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab suggests that neglect and failure to maintain archives often pose greater threats than hardware failures themselves.

Whether recordings reside on magnetic tape, hard drives, cloud servers, or future storage technologies, preservation depends on continued oversight, migration planning, and active management.

For archivists responsible for safeguarding historic recordings, modern tape remains part of that strategy—not as a replacement for cloud infrastructure, but as an additional layer designed to improve long-term survivability.

Tags: LTO Tape, Music Archives, Digital Preservation, Cloud Storage, Grateful Dead Archive, Data Backup, Audio Restoration, Fujifilm

The post Music Archivists Continue Backing Up Digital Collections to Modern Tape Storage appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The patents, filed by MIT Cables founder Bruce Brisson, outline designs that incorporate electrical network components into signal paths rather than relying solely on conductor materials, geometry, or shielding. The filings have fueled discussion because they describe intentional signal-shaping behavior that differs from the conventional expectation that audio cables should function as neutral transmission devices.

Patents Describe Integrated Passive Networks

The earliest patent cited in the discussion dates to 1992, when Bruce Brisson received U.S. Patent 5,142,252, titled “Audio Signal Transmission Line With a Low Pass Filter.”

According to the patent documentation, the invention incorporates discrete inductive components into an audio transmission line to create filtering behavior. The patent explicitly describes a low-pass filter structure rather than improvements related solely to conductor design or shielding techniques.

A later filing, U.S. Patent 7,242,780, expanded on the concept. Described as an “audio signal cable with passive network,” the patent details resistor-capacitor (RC) circuits connected between cable conductors and tuned to specific frequencies.

Examples included in the patent reference frequency points ranging from approximately 30 Hz to 3.5 kHz in a guitar-cable implementation, frequencies that fall within ranges listeners commonly associate with tonal balance and musical character.

Patent classification records also place the invention under classifications associated with amplitude-frequency equalizers and fixed equalization systems, indicating that examiners viewed the design as a form of frequency-response shaping rather than a purely passive transmission medium.

Measurements Support Filtering Behavior

Independent testing cited in the discussion provides additional, though limited, evidence that some commercial products based on these concepts exhibit measurable filtering characteristics.

In testing conducted by Alpha Audio, the publication reported unusual capacitance behavior from MIT’s EVO Three cable at frequencies above 100 kHz. While those measurements occurred outside the audible range, they demonstrated that the cable was not behaving like a simple conductor alone.

The measurements do not establish that a specific audible equalization curve exists across every MIT product, nor do they prove audible coloration on their own. However, they do support the broader observation that additional circuitry influences signal behavior within at least some cable designs.

As a result, the patent documentation and measurement data contribute different pieces of evidence. The patents describe intentional passive networks designed around specific frequency targets, while independent measurements indicate that at least one commercial implementation exhibits measurable filtering characteristics.

Engineering Language Gave Way to Proprietary Terminology

Comments from Brisson over the years provide additional context regarding the company’s design philosophy.

In a 2010 interview with Dagogo, Brisson described early MIT speaker cables as “distributed low pass filters,” terminology that closely matches language used in the original patent filings.

He also discussed the importance of what MIT later marketed as “Articulation,” a proprietary term associated with the company’s network technology. According to the interview, Brisson ranked network behavior and impedance management above conductor material and conductor geometry when discussing factors affecting cable performance.

“Conductor material is important, but once you understand how it actually affects the sound, you find it is actually easier to control those effects much more optimally in another manner,” Brisson stated during the interview.

Over time, MIT’s marketing language evolved toward proprietary terminology such as “Articulation Poles,” while standard engineering descriptions became less prominent in product literature.

The article notes that terms used in promotional materials do not appear within the patent filings themselves, where conventional electrical-engineering language is used to describe the underlying circuitry.

Debate Shifts From Neutrality to Preference

The findings raise a different question than the traditional cable debate.

Rather than focusing solely on whether cables can alter sound, the evidence suggests that some cable manufacturers intentionally design products to modify signal behavior through integrated passive networks.

Listening evaluations cited in the article indicate that some listeners have preferred the resulting presentation. Alpha Audio reported that one evaluator ranked an MIT cable highly for perceived detail and imaging, while other listeners described different tonal characteristics.

Those differing impressions highlight the subjective nature of listening preferences and reinforce the distinction between measurable signal shaping and listener preference.

Alternative Approaches Offer Adjustable Control

The article also compares network-based cable systems with standalone equalization products.

Unlike adjustable equalizers, passive networks integrated into cables generally provide fixed frequency-response characteristics determined by the manufacturer. Users typically cannot alter those settings once the product is installed.

By contrast, dedicated equalizers and digital signal-processing devices allow listeners to modify tonal balance, room correction, and frequency response according to personal preferences or listening environments.

The comparison illustrates a broader discussion within the audio community regarding whether fixed signal shaping built into cables offers advantages over more flexible and transparent equalization solutions.

Similar Designs Appear Across Multiple Brands

The article further notes that Alpha Audio’s testing identified similar response behavior from both MIT and Transparent cable designs, each of which incorporates inline network modules.

While comparable measurements do not necessarily indicate identical circuitry, the findings suggest that multiple manufacturers have explored approaches that extend beyond conventional cable construction by introducing additional passive network elements into the signal path.

The broader takeaway is not that all premium cables function as equalizers, but that certain designs intentionally incorporate circuitry capable of influencing signal behavior. Patent records, manufacturer statements, and independent measurements collectively indicate that some products marketed as cables may also perform functions traditionally associated with fixed passive filtering networks.

Tags: MIT Cables, Audio Cables, Passive Networks, Equalization, Audio Engineering, Bruce Brisson, Signal Processing, High-End Audio

The post Patent Filings Reveal How Some Premium Audio Cables Intentionally Shape Signal Response appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The project examined whether unsold vinyl records could be recycled into new pressings without significantly compromising audio performance. According to findings released by the participating organizations, approximately 10,000 unsold records from Warner Music Group’s European inventory were collected and processed by Czech pressing manufacturer GZ Media. The records were shredded, micronized, and converted into new vinyl compounds containing varying levels of recycled material.

The initiative addresses a growing challenge within the vinyl industry, where demand continues to rise while large quantities of unsold inventory remain difficult to reuse within existing manufacturing systems.

“Vinyl demand is growing, but the industry was never designed to bring unsold records back into production,” Miriam Lessar, Vice President of Global Release Management at Warner Music Group, stated in comments included within the project report. “Waste is a design problem we have not solved yet.”

Blind Evaluation Compared Six Vinyl Formulations

To assess whether recycled content affected playback quality, the team produced a custom test record using six different material formulations. These included four recycled-content blends containing 10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% recycled vinyl, alongside a virgin PVC control pressing and GZ Media’s Eco Mix compound, which is manufactured from internal production scrap.

Each pressing contained identical audio content and was anonymized before evaluation. The records were then assessed through blind listening sessions conducted by a seven-member panel at Abbey Road Studios.

The test record was intentionally designed to expose surface-noise characteristics. Both sides contained 20-second silent passages intended to reveal background noise, clicks, and crackle that may not be noticeable during normal music playback.

Results showed relatively small overall differences among the six variants, with all scores falling within roughly half a point on a ten-point scale. However, consistent trends emerged during the evaluation.

The highest-rated pressing was the 25% recycled formulation, which marginally outperformed the virgin PVC control. By contrast, the fully recycled 100% variant received the lowest ratings and generated more reports of crackle, clicks, and background noise.

According to the report, these rankings remained stable even after sensitivity analysis that removed individual listeners from the results, suggesting that the outcome was not driven by a single participant’s preferences.

Music Content Influenced Perceived Noise Levels

One of the more notable findings involved the interaction between vinyl surface noise and musical content.

The test record featured different material on each side. Side A contained acoustic post-rock recordings with greater dynamic range and quieter passages, while Side B featured louder, more compressed rock music.

Listeners generally reported better results from Side B, where the stronger signal levels tended to mask low-level surface noise. Side A exposed more pressing artifacts because quieter sections left less music available to conceal background imperfections.

The findings suggest that recycled vinyl performance may vary depending on the type of music being pressed. Surface noise that remains largely unnoticed on heavily compressed recordings may become more apparent on recordings that include extended quiet passages or wider dynamic contrasts.

Miles Showell, mastering engineer at Abbey Road Studios, described the results as largely consistent across the various formulations, stating that recycled content appeared to have limited influence on overall playback quality within the scope of the pilot project.

Feedstock Selection Emerged as a Key Variable

Although the project began with roughly 10,000 warehouse records, only a small portion ultimately proved suitable for processing.

The pilot excluded colored vinyl releases, smaller vinyl formats, and older pressings produced before certain European regulatory standards. Of the five candidate titles initially selected, two colored-vinyl releases were eliminated during processing due to material-related issues.

As a result, the usable feedstock was reduced to three black-vinyl titles originating from different pressing facilities.

The report indicates that feedstock consistency may be one of the most significant challenges facing large-scale vinyl recycling efforts. GZ Media’s Eco Mix material, produced from known internal manufacturing scrap, ranked among the strongest-performing formulations and generated no operational difficulties during production.

By comparison, mixed-origin recycled material sourced from records manufactured at different facilities produced less predictable outcomes and proved more difficult to stabilize during processing.

The findings suggest that recycled vinyl may perform most consistently when manufacturers maintain tighter control over the composition of source materials.

Study Highlights Measurement and Independence Limitations

The report also acknowledged several limitations.

The evaluation relied primarily on expert listening rather than comprehensive instrumental measurements. While preliminary quality-control testing was conducted, the published findings did not include detailed signal-to-noise ratios, groove-level measurements, or complete spectral analyses that would allow independent laboratories to reproduce the results.

In addition, all seven listening-panel members were affiliated with organizations involved in the project, including Abbey Road Studios, GZ Media, and Warner Music Group Studio Services.

The blind-test design reduced the risk of direct evaluation bias, but the absence of independent participants remains a notable limitation when interpreting the findings.

Sustainability Goals Extend Beyond Individual Records

The report’s recommended path forward includes the use of mass-balance accounting systems, which track recycled material across overall factory production rather than guaranteeing that a specific record contains a precise percentage of recycled content.

Under this model, recycled content becomes a factory-level sustainability metric rather than a characteristic that can necessarily be verified within an individual disc.

Despite those limitations, the pilot demonstrated that lower-percentage recycled blends can achieve performance levels comparable to conventional vinyl formulations under controlled manufacturing conditions.

The results also indicate that source-material consistency may ultimately play a larger role in playback quality than recycled content percentage alone, particularly as the industry explores methods of reducing waste while maintaining acceptable audio standards.

Tags: Recycled Vinyl, Vinyl Records, Warner Music Group, GZ Media, Abbey Road Studios, PVC Pressing, Listening Tests, Audio Manufacturing

The post Blind Listening Test Finds Recycled Vinyl Can Match Virgin Pressings—Up to a Point appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A feature published by Headphonesty profiled Australian record dealer Jon Ordon, whose decision to leave accounting in the early 1990s eventually led to the creation of a large-scale vinyl business spanning record stores, fairs, and collector networks across Australia.

Ordon’s story arrives amid sustained interest in vinyl records, a format that has experienced renewed demand over the past decade as collectors, audiophiles, and younger listeners continue embracing physical music ownership.

A Childhood Interest Became a Lifelong Obsession

According to Headphonesty, Ordon’s connection to vinyl began in 1980 when he purchased Scary Monsters (and Super Creeps) by David Bowie at age 12.

He later expanded from cassette tapes into LP collecting and developed a strong attachment to analog playback. Ordon described vinyl listening as a more immersive experience, citing the format’s sound characteristics and physical interaction as major reasons for his long-term interest.

His collecting habits gradually evolved into a buying-and-selling system. He often purchased records without knowing whether he would enjoy them, keeping favored albums while selling others. Over time, that approach became the foundation of his future business.

Leaving Accounting During the CD Boom

After leaving school, Ordon worked as a chartered accountant. However, music remained his primary interest.

Headphonesty reported that he left the profession in 1991 at age 21 and opened his first record store in West Ryde, Sydney. The move came during a period when compact discs were rapidly replacing vinyl as the dominant physical music format.

Family members and industry observers reportedly questioned the decision, with many viewing records as outdated technology. Ordon nevertheless believed there would remain a dedicated audience for vinyl collectors and enthusiasts.

That prediction ultimately aligned with broader industry trends. Vinyl, once considered a declining format, later returned as one of the music sector’s strongest physical-media categories.

Building a National Record Business

Following the launch of his first store, Ordon expanded into additional retail locations and later acquired established record businesses.

According to the report, inventory growth often came through the purchase of entire record collections, including large estates containing tens of thousands of albums. These acquisitions helped transform the scale of his operation while also exposing him to rare and hard-to-find releases.

Beyond storefront retail, Ordon became heavily involved in record fairs across Australia. The events allowed dealers and collectors to exchange information, discover new inventory sources, and build relationships within the vinyl community.

Headphonesty noted that this network-driven approach became a key part of his long-term business strategy, helping him identify valuable records and specialized collector markets.

More Than 200,000 Records and Still Collecting

Today, Ordon operates from the Blue Mountains region of Australia, where his inventory of more than 200,000 records is housed in dedicated storage facilities. The collection includes everything from common catalog titles to highly sought-after collector pieces.

Rather than maintaining a traditional retail storefront, he continues traveling to record fairs and collector events across the country, selling inventory directly to enthusiasts and maintaining relationships within the vinyl community.

Despite managing one of Australia’s largest private record inventories, Ordon reportedly maintains a separate personal collection of nearly 3,000 albums that remain outside his commercial operation. Those records hold particular sentimental value and reflect decades of collecting history.

Vinyl Culture Continues Expanding

Ordon’s experience reflects a broader resurgence in record collecting that extends beyond nostalgia.

Industry coverage in recent years has highlighted continued growth in vinyl demand, with collectors increasingly viewing records as both cultural artifacts and long-term physical media ownership. Rising interest has also contributed to expanding collector communities, independent record businesses, and specialized music events.

Headphonesty reported that after more than three decades in the record trade, Ordon still identifies primarily as a collector rather than a retailer. His continued search for rare releases reflects the enduring appeal that vinyl maintains among dedicated music enthusiasts.

The post Former Accountant Builds 200,000-Record Vinyl Business After Leaving Finance Career appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A recent report from Headphonesty examined several factors behind the format’s continued resurgence, pointing to a combination of affordability, collector culture, artist merchandising strategies, and renewed interest in physical ownership. According to the publication, UK cassette sales reached 164,000 units in 2025, representing a 53% year-over-year increase, while U.S. sales totaled 446,500 units during the same period.

The figures remain small compared with streaming volumes and vinyl sales, but they highlight how a format once considered obsolete has developed a sustainable niche within the modern music market.

Lower Costs Make Physical Music More Accessible

One of the strongest drivers behind cassette demand is price.

Headphonesty reported that many new cassette releases typically sell between $10 and $20, placing them well below the cost of many new vinyl editions. That pricing allows listeners to purchase physical releases without committing to the higher costs often associated with records and turntable ownership.

The format also fits comfortably within today’s collector-focused music economy. Fans looking for a physical connection to artists can acquire limited-edition releases, alternate artwork variants, and merchandise bundles at a lower entry point than vinyl.

Independent Artists Continue Embracing Tape Releases

Cassette production has also become an increasingly practical option for independent musicians.

According to the report, small tape runs remain significantly cheaper to manufacture than vinyl records, allowing artists to produce physical merchandise without the financial risks associated with large pressing orders. The format has become particularly common on direct-to-fan platforms and at live performances, where physical sales often generate higher revenue than streaming alone.

For smaller labels and DIY artists, cassettes provide a manageable way to release music while maintaining greater control over inventory and production costs.

Two Generations Are Fueling the Revival

The cassette resurgence appears to be attracting both longtime music fans and younger listeners, though often for different reasons.

Older buyers frequently associate the format with personal memories from the 1980s and 1990s, including mixtapes, portable cassette players, and radio recordings. Younger consumers, meanwhile, often encounter cassettes as a novel format distinct from streaming services and touchscreen-based listening habits.

Headphonesty noted that many younger buyers have no direct experience with the cassette era, making the format feel less like nostalgia and more like a new physical experience.

Online discussions across collector communities reflect similar motivations, with users frequently citing ownership, tactile interaction, and reduced dependence on digital platforms as reasons for purchasing physical media.

Major Artists Have Expanded Cassette Visibility

The format’s return has also been reinforced by major-label participation.

Headphonesty highlighted cassette releases from artists including Taylor Swift, Billie Eilish, Lady Gaga, Charli XCX, The Weeknd, and Elton John as evidence that tapes are increasingly integrated into mainstream album campaigns.

Limited-edition cassette variants, alternate packaging, and collectible color designs have become common elements of release strategies aimed at dedicated fan bases. The approach allows labels to expand physical merchandise offerings without requiring vinyl-level production costs.

Physical Ownership Remains Part of the Appeal

Another recurring theme behind cassette demand is ownership.

Unlike streaming libraries, physical releases remain available regardless of licensing disputes, subscription changes, or platform decisions. Headphonesty pointed to several recent examples where music temporarily disappeared from streaming services due to licensing changes, reinforcing concerns among some listeners about long-term access.

Community discussions around physical media frequently reference similar frustrations, with some listeners describing streaming platforms as increasingly cluttered or overly dependent on recommendation systems and algorithms.

The broader trend extends beyond cassettes alone. Coverage across the hi-fi industry continues to show sustained interest in physical music formats, including vinyl and CDs, even as streaming remains the dominant method of consumption.

New Hardware Is Lowering Entry Barriers

For years, access to reliable playback equipment remained one of the format’s biggest obstacles.

That situation has started to change as manufacturers introduce new cassette players aimed at contemporary buyers. Headphonesty highlighted products such as the FiiO CP13 and portable players from We Are Rewind, both designed to combine retro-inspired formats with modern conveniences including rechargeable batteries and updated hardware engineering.

While cassette playback still carries inherent technical limitations compared with modern digital audio formats, the availability of new hardware has made the format easier for first-time buyers to explore without relying entirely on vintage equipment.

As streaming continues to dominate music consumption, cassette tapes remain a comparatively small segment of the market. However, continued sales growth, artist participation, and collector interest suggest the format has established a durable position within today’s physical media landscape rather than functioning solely as a short-term nostalgia trend.

The post Cassette Sales Continue Rising as Physical Music Finds New Audiences in 2026 appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.