Published: September 27, 2025, 14:00 EDT

NEW YORK — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a defiant address at the United Nations General Assembly on Friday, vowing that Israel “must finish the job” against Hamas in Gaza despite mounting international isolation. His speech, marked by walkouts, protests, and accusations of war crimes, came as global calls intensify for an immediate ceasefire and recognition of Palestinian statehood.

Delegates Walk Out as Netanyahu Speaks

Netanyahu began his remarks to a partially empty UN hall after dozens of diplomats staged a walkout in protest. Seats reserved for major allies, including the United States and the United Kingdom, were occupied only by lower-level envoys, underscoring the diplomatic chill facing Israel. Iran’s delegation left behind images of children it said were killed in Gaza, highlighting the humanitarian toll of the conflict.

The prime minister accused critics of fueling antisemitism, stating: “Antisemitism dies hard. In fact, it doesn’t die at all.” He dismissed recent decisions by several countries to recognize Palestinian statehood, calling them “disgraceful” and claiming such moves would embolden terrorism.

War Framed as Regional Security Struggle

Throughout his address, Netanyahu presented Gaza as part of a broader regional conflict, citing Israeli military operations in Iran, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen. He argued that Israel’s actions were essential to regional stability and peace, describing Hamas as the “final remnants” of a threat that must be eradicated.

Netanyahu also highlighted ongoing negotiations with Syria for security arrangements and praised former U.S. President Donald Trump, calling him a key ally in confronting regional adversaries.

Symbolism and Outreach Beyond the UN

In a bid to amplify his message, Netanyahu used visual props, including a map labeled “THE CURSE,” illustrating Israel’s security challenges. He also wore a pin containing a QR code linking to information about the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack, which sparked the current conflict.

His office claimed that Israel broadcast the speech into Gaza using loudspeakers and mobile phone networks. However, journalists inside Gaza reported no evidence of such transmissions.

Palestinians in Wadi Gaza reacted with frustration and fatigue. “Whether he likes it or not, sooner or later, the Palestinian people will gain independence,” said displaced resident Moneir Talib. Another resident, Amjad Abdel Daiym, added: “When he says he wants to eradicate Hamas, I only see that the war is continuing against poor people like us.”

Hamas and Palestinian Leaders Respond

Hamas dismissed Netanyahu’s address as a justification for prolonging the war. In a statement, the group said: “If he were truly concerned about captives, he would have stopped his brutal bombardment and the destruction of Gaza City. Instead, he lies and continues to endanger their lives.”

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, speaking by video to the assembly a day earlier, welcomed recent recognition of Palestinian statehood by countries including France, Canada, and Australia. He urged the international community to do more, saying: “The time has come for the world to do right by the Palestinian people.”

Mounting International Isolation

Israel faces unprecedented diplomatic pressure. Over 150 nations now recognize Palestinian statehood, while the European Union is weighing sanctions. The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu on charges of crimes against humanity, which he rejects. The International Court of Justice is separately considering a case accusing Israel of genocide, which it strongly denies.

The war, triggered by the Hamas attack in 2023 that killed around 1,200 people and saw more than 250 hostages taken, has since killed over 65,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health officials. The United Nations estimates that 90% of Gaza’s population has been displaced, with widespread food shortages.

Protests and Polarization

As Netanyahu spoke, hundreds of pro-Palestinian protesters gathered outside the UN headquarters in New York. “Israel has chosen a war against every conscientious human being in this world,” said Nidaa Lafi of the Palestinian Youth Movement, drawing chants of “shame” from demonstrators.

Supporters, however, praised Netanyahu’s stance. UN Watch, a Geneva-based NGO, described his message as combining “defiance in the face of terror” with “a vision for peace with Arab neighbors, and even with a free Iran one day.”

The U.S. Balancing Act

While Washington remains Israel’s closest ally, cracks are emerging. Trump, set to meet Netanyahu on Monday, signaled limits to U.S. support. He said he would oppose any Israeli move to annex the occupied West Bank, despite calls from within Netanyahu’s government to do so.

Meanwhile, Israel has approved new settlement projects in the West Bank, a move critics argue undermines the possibility of a two-state solution. Netanyahu, however, rejected such a framework, claiming it would reward Hamas and weaken Israel’s security.

A Battle Framed as Global

Concluding his speech, Netanyahu positioned Israel’s war as part of a global fight against extremism. “You know deep down,” he told fellow leaders, “that Israel is fighting your fight.”

The remarks, delivered amid walkouts, protests, and legal challenges, underscored the isolation Israel now faces even as it presses ahead with its military campaign in Gaza.

Source: AP News – Facing global isolation at UN, a defiant Netanyahu says Israel ‘must finish the job’ against Hamas

The post Israel’s Netanyahu Defends Gaza Offensive at UN Amid Growing Global Pressure appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: August 8, 2025, 14:00 U.S. Eastern Time

U.S. President Donald Trump stated Thursday that he is prepared to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin even if the Kremlin leader declines to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The comments come amid speculation that Washington and Moscow may soon hold a high-level summit, possibly in the United Arab Emirates.

The announcement has stirred debate among diplomats and analysts over whether bypassing Ukraine in such discussions could sideline Kyiv’s interests in ongoing peace efforts for the nearly three-year-long war.

Potential Summit on the Horizon

Putin earlier expressed hope for a meeting with Trump as soon as next week, potentially hosted in the UAE. However, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt clarified that discussions over the meeting’s details are still underway.

When asked whether Putin’s participation in a summit would require prior talks with Zelenskyy, Trump responded, “No, he doesn’t. No.”

Initially, a U.S. official told The Associated Press that the absence of a Putin-Zelenskyy meeting would prevent a Trump-Putin summit. The official later revised the statement, saying it would only make such a meeting less likely. The comment was made on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.

A face-to-face between Trump and Putin would be a diplomatic boost for the Russian leader, who has consistently rejected Zelenskyy’s offers for direct talks. Putin has long hinted at a willingness to meet Trump to discuss ending hostilities in Ukraine.

Diplomatic Tensions and Deadlines

Putin’s remarks came just ahead of a White House deadline for Moscow to demonstrate progress toward ending the conflict or face additional economic sanctions.

Asked Thursday whether the deadline would remain in place, Trump said, “It’s going to be up to him. We’re going to see what he has to say. Very disappointed,” referring to Putin’s stance.

Putin, while not ruling out talks with Zelenskyy, said conditions must be “created” before such a meeting could happen. The Kremlin has previously stated that a meeting between the two leaders should only occur if a near-final agreement has been reached by their negotiating teams.

Concerns Over Ukraine’s Role

Ukraine fears being sidelined in direct negotiations between Washington and Moscow. Zelenskyy held calls with several European leaders Thursday, stressing the need for Europe’s direct involvement in ending the war.

“Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same bold approach from the Russian side. It is time to end the war,” Zelenskyy said, adding that any agreement must include a ceasefire and long-term security guarantees backed by the U.S. and European nations.

Despite Trump’s public calls for restraint, Russian attacks continue. A recent strike in Ukraine’s central Dnipro region killed four civilians and injured eight others, according to Kyiv officials.

Kremlin Priorities and U.S. Proposals

Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, emphasized that preparations for a productive bilateral meeting with Trump are the Kremlin’s main focus. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff had suggested including Ukraine’s leader in the summit, but Ushakov said the idea “was not specifically discussed.”

The announcement followed Putin’s meeting with UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Asked about who initiated the possible summit, Putin replied, “It doesn’t matter — both sides expressed an interest.”

Kirill Dmitriev, head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, said the talks could allow Moscow to present its position clearly and discuss mutually beneficial economic initiatives, including cooperation in rare earth element development.

Historical Context and Strategic Stakes

If held, the summit would mark the first U.S.-Russia leader meeting since 2021, when former President Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva. While Trump has claimed he could broker a deal to end the war, there is no guarantee such a meeting would yield a breakthrough, given the deep divide between Moscow and Kyiv over peace terms.

The war has killed tens of thousands of soldiers from both nations and more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to United Nations figures. Western officials accuse Putin of prolonging the conflict to secure more territorial gains.

Trump’s early second-term approach to Putin was conciliatory, echoing some Kremlin talking points. Recently, however, he has expressed growing frustration, criticizing Putin for resisting U.S.-led peace proposals and warning of new sanctions if progress stalls.

Shifting Ukrainian Public Opinion

A new Gallup poll suggests Ukrainians’ attitudes toward negotiations are shifting. Conducted in early July, the survey found that about 70% of Ukrainians now support pursuing a peace settlement as soon as possible — a stark reversal from 2022, when three-quarters favored fighting until victory.

Support for prolonging the war has declined across all regions and demographics. The poll excluded territories under Russian control, representing roughly 10% of Ukraine’s pre-war population.

Mixed Reactions in Kyiv

In Kyiv, residents voiced contrasting opinions on the potential Trump-Putin meeting.

“Negotiations are necessary, and we all want the war to end… because it will only end with talks,” said Ruslan Prindun.

Others were skeptical. Volodymyr Tasak argued it was “unlikely anything good” would come from the talks and feared Zelenskyy was being pushed aside. Lyudmila Kostrova believed Putin’s interest in meeting Trump was aimed at avoiding further sanctions rather than ending the war.

Source: AP News – Trump says he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader won’t meet with Ukraine’s Zelenskyy

The post Trump Open to Meeting Putin Without Precondition to Meet Zelenskyy appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A new step toward peace in eastern Congo was taken this weekend, as the Congolese government and the M23 rebel group signed a declaration of principles in Qatar. The deal is meant to end years of deadly conflict, restore state authority in key cities, and work toward a full peace agreement.

The signing is the first official commitment between the two sides since rebels seized important territory earlier this year. But questions remain — especially over whether the rebels will actually withdraw and how justice will be handled for victims of the long-running war.

A Deal to End the Fighting

On Saturday, Congo and the M23 rebels signed a declaration in Doha, Qatar, with help from international mediators. Qatar’s Minister of State, Mohammed bin Abdulaziz bin Saleh Al-Khulaifi, announced the agreement, saying both sides had committed to “building trust.”

This includes plans to exchange prisoners, return control of cities to the government, and push forward a roadmap toward peace. The goal is to restore full Congolese state authority in areas now controlled by armed groups.

A final peace deal is expected by August 18. According to the declaration, it will align with a previous peace agreement signed by Congo and Rwanda in June and facilitated by the United States.

Confusion Over Rebel Withdrawal

One of the biggest questions is whether the M23 will actually pull out of the cities it now controls. The group’s leaders gave mixed messages after the declaration was signed.

M23 leader Bertrand Bisimwa posted on X (formerly Twitter) that the agreement is not about withdrawing, but about “mechanisms for empowering the state.” Another M23 spokesman, Lawrence Kanyuka, told the Associated Press by phone, “We are in Goma with the population and we are not going to get out.”

The Congolese government, however, sees the agreement differently. Government spokesperson Patrick Muyaya said the deal includes a “non-negotiable withdrawal” by the rebels. He added that once the rebels leave, government forces and institutions would return to those cities.

Decades of War and Displacement

The M23 is one of more than 100 armed groups active in eastern Congo. The region is rich in minerals, and armed groups have been fighting for control for decades. M23 is widely believed to be backed by Rwanda, a claim Kigali denies.

According to the United Nations, more than 7 million people have been displaced by the violence in Congo. The U.N. has called the conflict in the east one of the “most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.”

Saturday’s agreement is seen as a possible breakthrough, but only if both sides follow through with real actions on the ground.

Reactions from Congo, Rwanda, and the U.S.

Rwanda’s Foreign Ministry welcomed the agreement, calling it a “significant step forward.” The U.S. State Department also voiced support, saying it remains committed to a peace deal that restores Congolese authority and creates inclusive governance.

Massad Boulos, a senior adviser to former U.S. President Donald Trump who attended the talks in Doha, said it’s time to find a “final solution” to the conflict. He emphasized that the most important part of the agreement is confirming state control in rebel-held cities.

“This issue requires dialogue and persistence,” Boulos said.

Local Doubts and Demands for Justice

In Goma, a city at the heart of the conflict, people met the news with caution. Many expressed concern that peace efforts will not work unless victims of the war get justice and support.

“We cannot build peace without justice and reparation,” said Amani Muisa, a Goma resident.

The peace document also includes a commitment to protect and help the millions of people who were forced to flee their homes because of the fighting.

What’s Next: Sticking Points Ahead

Although the agreement is a positive sign, several challenges remain.

One major issue is Rwanda’s military presence in eastern Congo. U.N. experts say thousands of Rwandan troops are operating in the region in support of M23. Rwanda has said it will remove its troops only after Congo deals with another armed group — one Kigali blames for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.

Another challenge is convincing M23 to give up control of strategic cities like Goma and Bukavu. Analysts say this could depend on whether the Congolese government offers meaningful concessions — and whether there’s real international pressure to enforce the agreement.

A Long Road Ahead

For now, the declaration signed in Qatar offers hope. But turning that hope into lasting peace will take more than promises on paper. It will require trust, justice, and concrete steps from both sides — especially in the cities and villages that have lived through years of fear and violence.

As the August deadline for a final peace deal approaches, all eyes will be on whether Congo, M23, and Rwanda can keep moving forward and finally put an end to one of Africa’s longest-running conflicts.

Source: AP News – Congo and Rwanda-backed rebels sign declaration of principles to end conflict in eastern Congo

The post Congo and M23 Rebels Sign Peace Declaration to End Conflict in Eastern Congo appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A Greek-owned, Liberian-flagged cargo ship was attacked Monday in the Red Sea by Yemen’s Houthi rebels, just one day after the same group claimed responsibility for sinking another commercial vessel in the same region.

The latest target, the Eternity C, came under gunfire and drone attack while sailing north toward the Suez Canal, according to EU naval forces and private security sources. The assault left two crew members injured and two others unaccounted for, raising fears that the Houthis are ramping up a renewed campaign against global maritime shipping.

Maritime Assault Follows Ship Sinking Near Yemen

The attack occurred less than 24 hours after the Houthis claimed to have sunk the Magic Seas, another Greek-owned cargo ship, following a multi-stage assault involving drones, missiles, rocket-propelled grenades, and small arms fire. The crew of 22 abandoned the vessel and were later rescued by a United Arab Emirates naval unit, according to officials.

The Eternity C, which had 21 Filipino crew members, one Russian, and three security guards aboard, did not request an escort before being targeted. EU naval forces confirmed the attack and stated that men in small boats, along with explosive-laden drones, were used in the ambush.

Yemen’s internationally recognized government, which opposes the Houthis, also blamed the rebel group for the attack.

Israeli Military Responds with Airstrikes on Houthi Ports

In apparent retaliation, Israel launched airstrikes early Monday on Houthi-controlled ports in western Yemen—including Hodeida, Ras Isa, and Salif—and on the Ras Kanatib power plant. The Israeli military said the ports were being used to transport Iranian weapons intended for attacks against Israel and allied vessels.

Israel also claimed to have struck the Galaxy Leader, a ship the Houthis seized in November 2023 and reportedly repurposed as a radar surveillance platform to monitor maritime traffic in the region.

“The Houthis will continue to pay a heavy price for their actions,” said Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz, promising further strikes.

Strategic Red Sea Corridor Threatened

The Red Sea has become a volatile maritime front since the Houthis began launching missile and drone attacks in late 2023, citing support for Hamas amid the war in Gaza.

Between November 2023 and January 2025, Houthi forces targeted more than 100 commercial vessels, sinking two and killing four sailors. Their campaign disrupted one of the world’s most critical shipping lanes, which usually handles over $1 trillion in goods annually.

Though attacks had paused after a U.S.-led airstrike campaign in March, Houthi forces have continued intermittent strikes on Israel and are now seemingly reigniting assaults on commercial shipping.

International Tensions Rising as Ceasefire Talks Stall

The maritime violence comes amid broader regional instability. Efforts to reach a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas remain fragile, and Iran’s role—including its potential return to nuclear negotiations following U.S. strikes on atomic sites in June—adds another layer of uncertainty.

The attacks also mark a potential turning point in the Red Sea crisis, with Western powers closely watching to see if the Houthis’ aggression will provoke renewed military intervention from the U.S. or its allies.

For now, shipping through the Red Sea—which had slightly increased in recent weeks—may again decline as the specter of Houthi violence returns to the world’s trade routes.

Source: AP News – Ship attacked in the Red Sea after a bulk carrier sinking claimed by Yemen’s Houthi rebels

The post Back-to-back maritime assaults near Yemen escalate tensions amid fragile Israel-Hamas ceasefire talks and ongoing conflict with Iran. appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

KYIV, Ukraine — In the dead of night, Russia launched its most devastating air assault on Kyiv since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022. Ukrainian officials said the hours-long missile and drone barrage killed one person and injured at least 26 others, including a child.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described the seven-hour overnight assault as “harsh” and “sleepless,” while air raid sirens, explosions, and emergency vehicles filled the city. The widespread destruction affected multiple districts across the capital, scattering debris, damaging ambulances, and reducing buildings to rubble.

“What Kyiv endured last night cannot be called anything but a deliberate act of terror,” said Economy Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko.

Kyiv Endures Relentless Attack

According to Ukraine’s air force, Russia launched 550 drones and missiles across the country overnight, including 11 ballistic and cruise missiles. Most were Iranian-made Shahed drones. Ukraine’s defenses intercepted many, but debris rained down on the capital.

Authorities said five ambulances were damaged while responding to calls, and over 300 tons of rubble had to be cleared from city streets. In Kyiv, at least 14 people were hospitalized. Emergency services reported damage in at least five of the city’s 10 districts.

“We were all in the basement shelter because it was so loud. Staying home would have been suicidal,” said Alya Shahlai, a 23-year-old wedding photographer whose home was destroyed.

A Phone Call Between Zelenskyy and Trump

Hours after the assault, Zelenskyy said he had a “very important and productive” phone call with former U.S. President Donald Trump. The two discussed strengthening Ukraine’s air defenses, future U.S.-Ukraine weapons production partnerships, and broader peace efforts.

“We talked about defense industry capabilities, joint projects in drone tech, and diplomatic cooperation,” Zelenskyy said.

The White House did not immediately comment on the call, and Zelenskyy’s statement noted plans for further meetings between the countries’ teams.

Russia Escalates Attacks Across Ukraine

This latest assault comes amid a renewed Russian offensive. Less than a week ago, Ukraine experienced what was then the largest air strike of the war—now eclipsed by this recent bombardment.

Russia has also been pressing hard along the 1,000-kilometer front line. In June alone, it launched a record 5,438 drones and more than 330 missiles across Ukraine.

“Absolutely horrible and sleepless night in Kyiv,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha posted on X.

In addition to Kyiv, the Dnipropetrovsk, Sumy, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, and Kyiv oblasts suffered damage from drone and missile strikes.

Meanwhile: Trump Talks to Putin

The airstrike coincided with a separate call between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. When asked about progress toward ending the war, Trump said:

“I’m very disappointed with the conversation I had today with President Putin. I don’t think he’s looking to stop [the fighting], and that’s too bad.”

Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, confirmed the Russian leader remains committed to achieving the Kremlin’s objectives in Ukraine, saying Russia will not back down.

Russia Targets Ukraine’s Military Industry

Russia’s Defense Ministry claimed its forces were targeting military manufacturing sites, including drone factories in Kyiv.

Zelenskyy has repeatedly called out these justifications as disinformation, citing continued attacks on civilian infrastructure. Ukrainian air defenses reportedly shot down 270 targets, including two cruise missiles. However, Russia still managed to strike eight confirmed sites using 63 drones and nine missiles.

Prisoner Swaps Continue Amid War of Attrition

Despite failed peace talks, both Ukraine and Russia confirmed a new prisoner exchange took place Friday. Zelenskyy said most of the returned Ukrainian soldiers had been held since 2022 and were seriously ill or injured.

While calls for diplomacy continue, so too does Russia’s increasingly destructive assault strategy — with Kyiv now at the center of the storm.

Source: AP News – Russia launches largest missile and drone barrage on Kyiv since war in Ukraine began

The post Russia Launches Largest Missile and Drone Strike on Kyiv Since War Began appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

As Ukraine faces one of its most intense waves of Russian attacks since the war began, the United States has decided to pause certain weapons shipments to Kyiv — a move that’s already sparking concern among Ukrainian leaders.

The White House confirmed the decision on Tuesday, saying it came after a Department of Defense review and was made to “put America’s interests first.” While officials did not specify which weapons are being withheld, reports suggest that Patriot air defense missiles, precision artillery rounds, and other high-demand munitions are affected.

Strategic Pause or Risky Timing?

This shift comes at a particularly sensitive time for Ukraine. Over the weekend, the country endured what it called the largest aerial assault since the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022 — more than 500 drones, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles were launched by Russian forces.

Ukrainian MP Fedir Venislavskyi, part of the ruling party, described the U.S. decision as “very unpleasant and painful,” especially in the face of ongoing “terrorist attacks” by Russia.

What’s Behind the U.S. Decision?

A U.S. official told CBS News the pause is driven by growing concerns that American stockpiles of advanced weaponry are running too low. Despite this, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly stressed that the strength of U.S. forces remains unquestioned, adding pointedly, “Just ask Iran.”

The Defense Department echoed this message. Undersecretary Elbridge Colby stated that the Pentagon remains committed to supporting Ukraine but is “rigorously examining” how to balance that aid with U.S. military readiness.

Trump and Zelensky: From Confrontation to Cooperation

The announcement also follows a recent meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during the NATO summit in the Netherlands. Though the two had previously clashed — most notably during a tense Oval Office meeting in March — Trump said their latest conversation was “very nice.”

He also suggested that the U.S. might still supply more Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, saying, “We are going to see if we can make some of them available.”

Earlier this year, Trump temporarily paused both military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine — suspensions that were later reversed. In April, a new deal between Washington and Kyiv was signed, giving the U.S. access to Ukraine’s valuable mineral reserves in exchange for continued military assistance.

International Talks and Russian Claims

Meanwhile, diplomacy saw a surprising development. French President Emmanuel Macron spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin for over two hours on Tuesday — their first direct conversation in more than two years. Macron called for a ceasefire and peace talks to achieve a “lasting resolution” to the war.

The Kremlin, however, doubled down. Putin reportedly told Macron that Western policies were to blame for the conflict, claiming that Russia’s security concerns had long been ignored. Just last month, Putin declared that “the whole of Ukraine is ours,” asserting a shared identity between Russians and Ukrainians.

On the Ground: Russia Advances, Ukraine Strikes Back

Russia continues to make slow but steady gains in Ukraine. This week, it claimed full control of the eastern Luhansk region and reported new territory captured in the southeastern Dnipropetrovsk region. Moscow now controls about 20% of Ukraine, including Crimea, annexed back in 2014.

But Ukraine isn’t backing down. On Tuesday, it launched a long-range strike on a weapons manufacturing plant in Izhevsk, deep inside Russian territory — more than 1,000 kilometers from the border. The attack killed at least three people and targeted a facility known for producing drones and radar systems.

Source: BBC – US halts some weapons shipments to Ukraine, White House says

The post U.S. Pauses Key Weapons Shipments to Ukraine Amid Rising Stockpile Concerns appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Iran’s foreign minister has confirmed what international inspectors and intelligence reports have already suggested: U.S. strikes caused significant damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities — despite Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei publicly downplaying the impact.

In a rare moment of candor on state TV, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi admitted that the U.S. attacks left Iran’s nuclear infrastructure heavily compromised.

“The level of damage is high, and it’s serious damage,” Araghchi said, according to the Associated Press.

His statement directly contradicts Khamenei’s earlier remarks, in which the supreme leader insisted the American operation had “failed to achieve anything significant.” The ayatollah’s messaging appeared more focused on projecting strength than acknowledging the situation on the ground.

Reality on the Ground: Damage Confirmed

Independent assessments support Araghchi’s version. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed on Tuesday that inspectors had found “extensive damage at several nuclear sites” in Iran — specifically noting impacts to both uranium conversion and enrichment facilities.

Post-strike intelligence has also shown that both U.S. and Israeli operations — Operation Midnight Hammer and Operation Rising Lion, respectively — inflicted damage that could take Iran’s nuclear program months, if not years, to fully recover from.

Despite this, Khamenei remains defiant. He touted Iran’s retaliatory missile strike on Al-Udeid Airbase in Qatar as a major show of strength — calling it a “heavy slap to the U.S.’s face.” President Donald Trump, however, dismissed the response as a “very weak” gesture and sarcastically thanked Iran for giving advance warning.

Where Do Nuclear Talks Stand Now?

While the military strikes have undoubtedly complicated U.S.–Iran relations, diplomatic channels may not be entirely closed.

Araghchi admitted that the path to negotiations has become “more complicated and more difficult,” but he didn’t rule out the possibility of eventually returning to the table.

That said, tensions were already high before the latest round of hostilities. Iran had accused the U.S. of being “complicit” in Israel’s covert operation, and officials in Tehran were already skeptical about engaging in new talks.

Trump Sends Mixed Signals on Future Diplomacy

In a statement on Wednesday, President Trump struck a characteristically unpredictable tone. While expressing openness to future talks, he also downplayed their importance.

“We’re going to talk to them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement, I don’t know. To me, I don’t think it’s that necessary,” Trump said.
“They had a war. They fought. Now they’re going back to their world. I don’t care if I have an agreement or not. The only thing we would be asking for is what we were asking for before — we want no nuclear [program]. But we destroyed the nuclear.”

Despite the bravado, there’s currently no official confirmation of any upcoming meetings between the two countries.

What’s Next?

With tensions high and trust low, the future of U.S.–Iran nuclear diplomacy remains uncertain. While Iran acknowledges the toll of U.S. strikes, political leaders on both sides continue to send mixed signals — balancing pressure and posturing with hints of possible negotiation.

What’s clear for now is that Iran’s nuclear program has taken a hit — one that Tehran can’t fully deny, no matter how hard its supreme leader tries to project invulnerability.

Source: FOX News – Iranian foreign minister reiterates ‘serious damage’ to nuclear facilities, despite ayatollah’s comments

The post Iran’s Foreign Minister Contradicts Ayatollah on Nuclear Attack Impact appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

For decades, Iran’s leadership projected power across the region, shielding its homeland through a vast web of proxy forces and projecting an image of untouchability. But that aura crumbled in just hours on June 13, when Israel launched an unprecedented series of strikes deep inside Iranian territory—a move that killed hundreds and left both Tehran and the international community reeling.

The attacks, which reportedly killed 627 people, including top nuclear scientists and military leaders, marked a turning point. It was the first time Iran had faced such direct and devastating strikes on its own soil. For many Iranians, it shattered the long-standing belief that—regardless of the turmoil abroad—they were safe at home.

“The Islamic Republic had one social contract with society,” said Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group. “It deprived them of freedoms in exchange for providing security. That image has now been shattered.”

A Wounded Regime, A Hardened Stance

The strikes didn’t just rattle Iran’s defenses—they struck at the heart of its pride. In the days that followed, Iran’s regime responded with mass arrests, public crackdowns, and tightened domestic controls. At least 700 people have been detained, accused of aiding Israel. Behind the scenes, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei reportedly went into hiding, not seen publicly since the ceasefire that followed the brief war.

Despite the massive loss of life and leadership, Iran quickly replaced fallen officials and mobilized its security forces, particularly the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Analysts say the IRGC may now emerge with even more authority—especially if the leadership vacuum deepens.

“There’s a strong desire among the Guards to double down—militarize more internally, and possibly even pursue nuclear weapons as a deterrent,” Vaez warned.

The Rise—and Risk—of Reformists

Before the conflict erupted, Iranians had elected Masoud Pezeshkian, a reformist who campaigned on dialogue with the West and a return to diplomacy. Many saw him as a final hope for re-engaging with the global community and reviving the long-stalled nuclear deal.

Pezeshkian has been one of the few government voices to appear publicly since the conflict. He even attended an anti-war protest in Tehran. But his future—and that of Iran’s moderate wing—is uncertain.

Some Iranians now question whether reform can still happen under a system that has become more repressive since the war. Others, while frustrated by the regime, expressed national pride in Iran’s ability to retaliate during the conflict, which included missile strikes on Tel Aviv and other Israeli cities that killed 28 people.

“People feel very nationalistic right now,” said one Iranian man. “The war felt unjustified, but the government handled it well. Still, what happens next is what worries us.”

Hardliners Feel Vindicated

If there’s one clear political outcome, it’s that Iran’s hardliners have been emboldened. For years, they’ve warned that diplomacy with the West was a trap—and now, after Israel’s direct strike and the U.S. joining in, their argument appears stronger than ever.

“In the short term, hardliners are likely to prevail,” said Sina Toossi of the Center for International Policy. “Reformist voices are being marginalized in this climate.”

And while some foreign powers may have hoped the attacks would destabilize Iran’s leadership, the opposite seems true. The regime is wounded—but not broken. And its paranoia may now drive even more aggressive domestic policies.

“The broader lesson is that the Islamic Republic is not invincible,” Toossi said. “But neither is it easily toppled.”

The Fallout for Khamenei

Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader for more than 35 years, now faces unprecedented scrutiny. Long seen as the final word on both domestic and foreign affairs, he’s being blamed—quietly but increasingly—for Iran’s vulnerability.

“He was too cautious when he had to be bold, and too bold when he had to be cautious,” Vaez said. “A lot of blame is being placed on his leadership.”

His silence during the crisis—and the rumors of bunker seclusion—has only added to public unease. Some experts even suggest that, in time, Iran’s entire system of supreme leadership may come under review, as the country weighs what kind of governance can protect it in an increasingly volatile world.

Uncertainty Ahead

Iran’s reformers, moderates, and civil society activists now find themselves in a precarious position. The leadership, badly shaken and increasingly suspicious of internal dissent, may seek to stamp out what it sees as weakness or betrayal.

Abroad, the Iranian opposition remains fragmented, and civil society inside the country is on the defensive.

Meanwhile, Iranians themselves are caught between national pride, fear of repression, and a deep sense of uncertainty.

“We’ve always known change must come from the inside,” said one woman. “But now, where do we find ourselves?”

Bottom Line: The myth of Iran’s invincibility is gone—and what comes next may be a more paranoid, militarized, and isolated state. For everyday Iranians, it’s not just about recovering from war—it’s about holding on to the hope that change is still possible in a country facing one of the greatest identity crises in its modern history.

Source: CNN – The myth of Iran’s invincibility has been broken, and the fallout could be far-reaching

The post Iran’s Aura of Invincibility Shattered After Israeli Strikes appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Despite President Trump’s claims of “total obliteration,” a new U.S. intelligence assessment paints a much more measured picture of the damage done to Iran’s nuclear program following recent American airstrikes.

According to an early report from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the strikes—though damaging—set Iran back by only a few months. They didn’t destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure entirely, as both Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have publicly claimed.

The findings, first reported by CNN and confirmed by two officials familiar with the classified report, challenge the public narrative pushed by the White House and raise concerns among experts that Iran may still retain the capability to eventually build a nuclear weapon.

Key Findings: What the U.S. Intelligence Report Reveals

• Damage was significant but not total: The DIA report states that while U.S. bombers hit nuclear facilities at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, these sites were not completely wiped out. Fordo’s entrance collapsed and infrastructure was damaged, but the underground enrichment facility remains largely intact.
• Iran preserved key materials: Intelligence suggests Iran had moved some of its enriched uranium stockpile before the strikes. It also retained much of its centrifuge infrastructure, essential for enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels.
• Minimal long-term disruption: Experts say the strikes set Iran’s program back only several months—far from the permanent destruction claimed by Trump and Netanyahu.
• Missed opportunity? The report raises the possibility that Iran, anticipating a strike, strategically relocated key assets, including uranium and possibly centrifuges, making the airstrikes less effective than hoped.

White House Pushes Back, Trump Doubles Down

The White House quickly rejected the DIA’s assessment. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called the leaked report “flat-out wrong” and accused officials of trying to “demean President Trump” and the U.S. military.

“Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration,” Leavitt said.

Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, who claims to have reviewed damage reports, echoed the president’s messaging and went a step further—calling the leak “treasonous” and demanding an investigation.

Trump has repeatedly insisted that the strikes left Iran’s nuclear program in ruins and that the country will “never rebuild” its facilities.

Netanyahu, too, took a victory lap, calling the strikes “historic” and declaring, “we brought to ruin Iran’s nuclear program.”

What Experts and Satellite Images Suggest

Outside observers have long suspected Iran might attempt to hide its most sensitive materials. New satellite images appear to confirm that theory:

• Trucks and bulldozers were seen at Fordo days before the attack, possibly moving enriched uranium or sealing tunnel entrances with dirt.
• Maxar Technologies, a satellite imaging firm, confirmed that Fordo’s tunnels were sealed before the bombs hit, suggesting Iran had anticipated the strikes.
• Eric Brewer, a former U.S. intelligence analyst, said it’s plausible that uranium enriched to 60% was removed and that some equipment, like centrifuges, may have also been relocated.

Could Iran Still Build a Bomb?

According to experts, the answer is yes—though with some caveats.

• Iran holds enough enriched uranium to build several bombs if it chooses to enrich it further to 90% weapons-grade levels, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
• Vice President JD Vance defended the operation, saying that even if Iran kept some uranium, the strikes dismantled their ability to convert it into a weapon: “That is mission success.”
• IAEA Director Rafael Grossi has repeatedly warned that Iran’s stockpile could enable weapon production if political leadership gives the order—something that has not yet officially happened.
• Iran is also said to be constructing a third enrichment site in Isfahan, but after the joint Israeli-American strikes, the status of that site is now uncertain.

So Where Does This Leave Us?

The big takeaway: While the strikes were powerful and symbolic, they fell short of eliminating Iran’s nuclear potential.

Iran still retains a “solid foundation” for restarting its nuclear efforts, says Brewer, especially if it chooses to go covert. And with critical materials and knowledge still intact, the international community may soon face a more determined and less transparent nuclear Iran.

Kelsey Davenport, a nonproliferation expert at the Arms Control Association, warned that if Iran has already hidden centrifuges, it could enrich weapons-grade uranium at a secret facility with a small footprint.

However, Brewer notes that any covert effort would start at a disadvantage. Iran has lost some key equipment and personnel, and building a bomb won’t happen overnight.

The Bigger Picture

With tensions high and facts disputed, the truth likely lies somewhere in between public declarations and classified assessments.

Yes, the strikes hit Iran hard—but “obliteration” may be more political theater than military fact. And if Iran’s nuclear ambitions remain alive, the path forward could be even more complicated than before.

Source: CNN – Early US intelligence report suggests US strikes only set back Iran’s nuclear program by months

The post U.S. Intel: Iran’s Nuclear Program Survived American Airstrikes appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — A high-stakes NATO summit kicked off Tuesday in the Netherlands, bringing world leaders together at a critical moment for the alliance’s future — and global security at large.

The two-day gathering, widely described as historic, could mark a turning point for the 32-member bloc. Leaders are expected to approve a bold new defense spending target: 5% of each country’s GDP dedicated to security. The move would signal a sweeping escalation in military preparedness, aimed squarely at countering threats from outside the alliance.

Trump’s Return Overshadowed by Iran Strikes and Surprise Ceasefire

Originally, much of the spotlight was expected to fall on U.S. President Donald Trump, who is attending his first NATO summit since returning to the White House. He was poised to claim credit for rallying allies behind the unprecedented military spending pledge — a long-standing priority for his administration.

But the narrative shifted abruptly following Trump’s unexpected strike on three Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities, a move the White House says was designed to weaken Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Just as stunning was Trump’s sudden announcement that Iran and Israel had reached a “complete and total ceasefire,” shifting global attention from Brussels to the Middle East overnight.

Ukraine Still Front and Center — Even if the Focus Has Shifted

While headlines swirl around Iran, NATO leaders insist that support for Ukraine remains a top priority. The war is now in its fourth year, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte emphasized that Ukraine’s defense and sovereignty are “non-negotiable.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived in The Hague for a full slate of meetings, though notably absent from a leaders-only session aimed at finalizing the new defense spending plan. He’s expected to meet with Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof and will later address the Dutch parliament.

The scene marks a shift from last year’s summit in Washington, where NATO’s closing statement strongly backed Ukraine’s future within the alliance, calling its path to membership “irreversible.”

France and Germany Back Peace, Warn of Long-Term Stakes

In a joint op-ed published Monday in the Financial Times, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz expressed strong support for U.S.-led efforts to secure peace in Ukraine. The leaders pledged to uphold Ukrainian sovereignty and ensure long-term European stability.

“Russia will find in France and Germany an unshakeable determination,” they wrote. “What is at stake will determine European stability for the decades to come.”

They added that Europe must guarantee Ukraine’s future as “prosperous, robust, and secure” — free from Russian aggression.

Bottom Line: As NATO leaders huddle behind closed doors in The Hague, the alliance faces no shortage of urgent challenges — from rising defense budgets and a protracted war in Ukraine, to surprise diplomacy in the Middle East. Whether the summit ends in unity or deepened divisions could shape the global security landscape for years to come.

Source: AP News – World leaders gather for historic NATO summit with unity on the line

The post Trump Returns to NATO Summit with Iran Strikes and Surprise Ceasefire in Spotlight appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.