The post China Eastern Crash Findings Renew Global Scrutiny Over Aviation Safety Oversight appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The aircraft, carrying 72 passengers and four crew members from Montreal, collided with the vehicle shortly before midnight, according to official statements. Authorities said approximately 40 passengers and crew, along with two fire truck personnel, required medical treatment, with most discharged within hours.

Safety and Operational Breakdown

Preliminary information indicates the fire truck had been cleared to cross the runway to respond to another aircraft incident, while the incoming flight was on final approach. Air traffic control audio suggests last-minute attempts were made to halt the vehicle, pointing to a breakdown in coordination between ground and air operations.

Aviation safety experts note that such incidents—classified as runway incursions—remain a persistent risk despite surveillance systems designed to track aircraft and vehicles. U.S. aviation data recorded 1,636 runway incursions in the previous year, underscoring ongoing operational challenges in high-traffic environments.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has recovered flight data and cockpit voice recorders for analysis, with investigators focusing on communication protocols and sequencing of clearances. Canadian authorities have also deployed a team, reflecting the cross-border nature of the flight.

Infrastructure and Capacity Constraints

LaGuardia Airport, operated by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, temporarily halted operations following the crash, with at least one runway expected to remain closed for several days. Flight operations resumed on a limited basis, resulting in delays and knock-on effects across U.S. domestic networks.

Officials stated that the airport currently employs 33 certified air traffic controllers against a target of 37, highlighting a broader staffing gap affecting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). While not directly attributed as a cause, workforce levels remain a structural issue across U.S. aviation infrastructure.

Industry analysts note that overnight operations, when staffing is typically reduced, can increase reliance on coordination precision, particularly when emergency vehicle movements intersect with active runways.

Regulatory and Technology Context

LaGuardia is equipped with an advanced surface movement surveillance system, designed to alert controllers to potential conflicts between aircraft and ground vehicles. However, experts emphasize that such systems function as advisory tools and do not override human clearance decisions.

Former FAA officials have noted that while the system can detect potential conflicts, it cannot determine whether a vehicle has been properly authorized to enter a runway. This limitation places continued emphasis on procedural discipline and communication clarity.

The FAA has faced long-term challenges in maintaining controller staffing levels, with recruitment and training pipelines struggling to keep pace with demand. These constraints have been cited in multiple safety reviews and congressional oversight discussions.

Market and Network Impact

The disruption at LaGuardia—New York’s third-busiest airport—had immediate implications for airline operations, particularly for carriers with significant hub presence. Delta Air Lines, a major operator at the airport, experienced schedule disruptions alongside broader network delays.

Short-haul regional routes, such as the Montreal–New York corridor, are critical for cross-border connectivity and business travel, making operational reliability a key industry metric. Analysts suggest that even short-term runway closures can have cascading effects on airline scheduling, aircraft utilization, and passenger flows.

The incident also marks the first fatal crash at LaGuardia in more than three decades, according to airport officials, potentially prompting renewed regulatory focus on runway safety protocols and incident prevention measures.

Investigation and Next Steps

Authorities have not yet determined the exact cause of the collision, with investigators expected to release preliminary findings in the coming days. The focus will include air traffic control procedures, vehicle clearance protocols, and adherence to safety systems.

Transportation officials emphasized that conclusions will be based on verified data from recorders and communication logs, with any regulatory or operational changes likely to follow formal recommendations.

The outcome of the investigation could influence future FAA safety directives, particularly around runway incursion mitigation and coordination between emergency response vehicles and active flight operations.

The post LaGuardia Airport Collision Kills Two Pilots, Disrupts U.S. Air Traffic Operations appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Authorities said the crash occurred late Sunday as a Bombardier CRJ aircraft operated by Jazz Aviation on behalf of Air Canada was landing after departing from Montréal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport. The aircraft struck a fire truck that had entered the runway to respond to a separate onboard issue reported by another flight.

Safety and Incident Overview

The pilot and copilot were killed in the impact, while 39 passengers and crew were transported to hospitals, with several initially reported in serious condition. Most have since been released, according to officials. Two personnel aboard the emergency vehicle sustained non-life-threatening injuries.

The collision caused severe structural damage to the aircraft’s cockpit, with images showing a crushed nose section and debris scattered across the runway. Emergency evacuation procedures were initiated, with passengers exiting via deployed stairways.

Air Traffic Coordination and Sequence of Events

Preliminary air traffic control audio indicates that a ground vehicle had been cleared to cross part of the runway before controllers attempted to halt its movement. A last-minute instruction to stop the vehicle was issued as the incoming aircraft approached, followed by an aborted landing instruction to another flight.

Officials have not confirmed whether communication breakdowns, visibility conditions, or procedural lapses contributed to the collision. The investigation will assess adherence to runway incursion prevention protocols and coordination between ground operations and air traffic control.

Operational Disruption and Airport Impact

The airport remained closed for several hours following the incident, with operations suspended until at least early afternoon Monday. The closure resulted in widespread flight cancellations and delays, affecting both domestic and regional networks.

According to U.S. aviation data, LaGuardia handled over 16.7 million passenger boardings in 2024, ranking among the busiest airports in the country. Even short-term disruptions at the facility can have cascading effects across airline schedules in the Northeast corridor.

Regulatory Investigation and Industry Implications

The National Transportation Safety Board has taken the lead in investigating the crash, with support from the Federal Aviation Administration. The inquiry will focus on runway access controls, vehicle clearance procedures, and situational awareness systems.

Analysts note that runway incursions involving ground vehicles remain a persistent safety concern, particularly at high-density airports where operational complexity is elevated. The findings could prompt renewed regulatory attention on ground movement surveillance technologies and training standards.

While aviation accidents involving collisions on active runways are rare, the incident underscores the importance of coordination between airside operations and emergency response units in maintaining safety margins at major transport hubs.

The post LaGuardia Runway Collision Kills Two Crew, Disrupts Airport Operations appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The post Delta Plane Crash Toronto: Safety Investigation Continues After Survivable Landing Failure appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Federal investigators released preliminary findings Thursday on the UPS cargo plane that crashed in Louisville, Kentucky, on November 4, killing 14 people. Dramatic images from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) show the aircraft’s left engine detaching mid-takeoff, sparking flames before the plane briefly lifted off the runway. The MD-11 jet reached only 30 feet (9.1 meters) before crashing near Muhammad Ali International Airport, killing three crew members and 11 people on the ground.

The NTSB report marks the first official details about the incident, suggesting that fractures in the engine mount may have contributed to the disaster. The investigation remains ongoing.

Preliminary Findings Show Structural Concerns

A series of six photographs from the NTSB illustrates the engine separating from the left wing. Flames are visible as the burning engine flies above the aircraft, underscoring the severity of the structural failure. The plane was last inspected in October 2021 but had not yet reached the threshold for a more detailed examination of engine mount components, which still required nearly 7,000 additional takeoffs and landings.

Jeff Guzzetti, a former federal crash investigator, noted that while UPS conducted maintenance within the required timeline, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may reassess whether the intervals are sufficient. “It appears UPS was conducting this maintenance within the required time frame, but I’m sure the FAA is now going to ponder whether that time frame is adequate,” Guzzetti told The Associated Press.

MD-11 Aircraft Grounded for Safety Checks

All MD-11 aircraft operated by UPS, FedEx, and Western Global, along with some related DC-10s, have been temporarily grounded pending inspections and repairs. The FAA has not yet specified the criteria for returning the planes to service.

Aviation expert John Cox described the cracks as fatigue-related, a common issue in metal parts subjected to vibration during flight. “It’s just a question of how often those parts need to be inspected and what maintenance is required,” Cox said. He added that such inspections could be costly, especially as airlines had already planned to retire these aircraft in the coming years.

MD-11 aircraft comprise roughly 9% of the UPS fleet and 4% of the FedEx fleet, according to company disclosures.

Flight Data and Early Warnings

The NTSB noted that cockpit voice recorders captured an alarm sounding approximately 37 seconds after the UPS crew initiated takeoff thrust. Todd Inman, NTSB board member, had briefed reporters on Nov. 7 about the flight data, emphasizing that the crash appears to be a human-error and maintenance-related tragedy rather than a natural disaster.

Sean Garber, whose salvage yard was struck by debris from the crash, described the event as a man-made calamity. “It’s one thing to be involved in a natural disaster and another thing to be involved in a human error tragedy, and that’s what we believe this is,” he said.

Historical Context and Aircraft Safety

The NTSB report referenced a similar event in 1979, when an American Airlines DC-10 crash in Chicago killed 273 people due to engine detachment. The DC-10 was the predecessor to the MD-11, sharing design features that experts describe as vulnerable to pylon attachment failures.

Former federal investigator Alan Diehl emphasized the need for more advanced inspection techniques beyond visual checks. “It is clear that engine pylon attachment failures are these aircraft’s Achilles’ heels,” Diehl said. Boeing’s annual safety statistics indicate that the MD-11 and DC-10 have higher accident rates compared with other commercial aircraft.

UPS Response and Ongoing Investigation

UPS Airlines President Bill Moore stated that the company is cooperating with investigators to determine the crash’s root cause. “Once we determine that, then they’ll be able to develop an inspection plan,” Moore said. He added that repairs and inspections will take time and could involve significant technical and financial resources before the fleet can return to service.

The NTSB continues to analyze flight data, maintenance records, and wreckage to identify any procedural or mechanical lapses that contributed to the crash.

Community Mourning Continues

More than two weeks after the crash, Louisville residents continue to mourn. The Louisville Orchestra held a free concert on Thursday evening, with Music Director Teddy Abrams noting that music offers comfort in times of tragedy. The community has grappled with the human toll of the disaster, highlighting the broader impact of aviation accidents on local populations.

Source: AP News – Investigators say UPS plane that crashed in Kentucky, killing 14, had cracks in engine mount

The post Investigators Reveal Engine Mount Cracks in UPS Plane Crash That Killed 14 appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Less than 40 seconds — that’s all the time Air India Flight 171 was in the air before it tragically crashed into a busy neighborhood in Ahmedabad, marking one of India’s most puzzling aviation disasters in recent years.

Now, investigators face the daunting challenge of piecing together what went wrong in those critical moments after takeoff. The plane, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, was headed to London’s Gatwick Airport when it went down. Understanding the cause will involve painstaking analysis of the wreckage and decoding the cockpit voice and flight data recorders — often called the “black boxes.”

Under international rules set by the UN aviation body ICAO, a preliminary report is expected within 30 days, with a final report ideally ready within a year.

What Happened in Those First 40 Seconds?

The flight took off at 13:39 local time on Thursday, carrying 242 passengers and crew along with nearly 100 tonnes of fuel. Just moments after liftoff, a mayday call crackled over the radio — the last sound from the cockpit before the plane lost altitude and crashed, engulfed in flames.

Experts call this type of crash extremely rare. Captain Kishore Chinta, a former investigator with India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), said it’s “the rarest of the rare” cases — a controlled flight into terrain within seconds after takeoff, something almost unheard of in modern aviation.

What Could Have Gone Wrong?

The list of possibilities is long: Did both engines fail simultaneously due to bird strikes or contaminated fuel? Were the flaps not properly extended, which would reduce lift on a heavily loaded plane flying in hot conditions? Was there a maintenance error? Or did the crew unintentionally cut off fuel to the engines?

Investigators are methodically working through all these scenarios — and more. Air crash probes rely on piecing together physical evidence from the wreckage with the data recorded by the plane’s systems to build a clear picture of what happened.

The Crucial Role of the Engines and Black Boxes

The first big clues usually come from examining the engines. According to Peter Goelz, former managing director of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the way turbine blades are damaged reveals whether the engines were producing power at impact. If the engines weren’t running, the investigation will zero in on what happened in the cockpit.

That’s where the black boxes come in. Air India and Indian authorities confirmed that both the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder have been recovered. These devices capture everything from pilot conversations and radio calls to precise technical data: throttle settings, engine performance, flap positions, and even cockpit background sounds.

What Will the Data Reveal?

If the data shows the engines were running at full power, the investigation will shift focus to the flaps and slats — crucial surfaces on the wings that provide lift during takeoff and landing. If those were correctly positioned, the mystery deepens.

There’s also a possibility that a malfunction in the Boeing 787’s highly automated flight management system played a role. This system helps pilots navigate, manage performance, and optimize fuel efficiency. A systemic failure here could have serious implications not just for this flight but for the global fleet of more than 1,100 Boeing 787s in operation worldwide.

No Immediate Safety Concerns, But Questions Remain

So far, India’s civil aviation ministry says recent inspections of Air India’s Boeing 787 fleet haven’t revealed major safety issues. Boeing itself has deferred to Indian authorities and is cooperating with the investigation.

The probe is being led by Indian investigators with expert assistance from Boeing, engine manufacturer GE, Air India, and international bodies like the NTSB and the UK’s investigation agency.

The Long Road Ahead

Crash investigations are complex. As Goelz notes, “Teams can usually determine what happened fairly quickly, but understanding why it happened takes much longer.” Investigators will collect every piece of the wreckage — every wire, nut, and bolt — and carefully reconstruct the aircraft’s final moments. This could happen in a hangar or secure facility nearby.

Fuel systems will also be scrutinized to rule out contamination, while maintenance logs and communication data transmitted by the plane will be analyzed in detail. Pilot records, simulator training results, and past flight data will all be reviewed to understand how the crew handled previous emergencies.

Technology Is Changing the Way We Investigate Crashes

Thanks to advancements in flight data recording, today’s black boxes capture hundreds or even thousands of parameters every second — a huge leap from the early days of aviation when data was limited. This wealth of information is transforming how quickly and accurately investigators can uncover what went wrong.

What’s Next?

In the coming weeks, we can expect a preliminary report shedding light on early findings. But the full picture — why this seemingly routine flight ended in tragedy so quickly — may take months to fully understand.

One thing is clear: The investigation will be thorough, with experts leaving no stone unturned as they work to bring answers to the families affected and lessons for the aviation community worldwide.

Source: BBC – How the Air India crash investigation is unfolding

The post Inside the Air India Crash Investigation: What Happened in Those 40 Seconds? appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A British passenger has reportedly survived the devastating Air India plane crash that killed more than 200 people in Ahmedabad, India, early this morning.

According to Ahmedabad Police Commissioner GS Malik, the sole known survivor was sitting in seat 11A on the Boeing 787-8, which was bound for London’s Gatwick Airport. The flight went down less than a minute after takeoff, crashing into accommodation used by medical staff near the airport.

Flight records identify the passenger in 11A as British national Vishwash Kumar Ramesh. Indian media outlets say they’ve spoken to Ramesh from his hospital bed, where he is being treated for his injuries.

“Thirty seconds after take-off, there was a loud noise and then the plane crashed. It all happened so quickly,” Ramesh reportedly said. He also shared his boarding pass with reporters, confirming his seat number and identity.

The aircraft was carrying 230 people in total, including 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese citizens, and one Canadian, according to Air India.

In a statement from Buckingham Palace, King Charles and Queen Camilla expressed their heartbreak over the tragedy:

“We are desperately shocked by the terrible events in Ahmedabad this morning. Our special prayers and deepest possible sympathy are with the families and friends of all those affected by this appallingly tragic incident across so many nations, as they await news of their loved ones.”

In response, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy has activated emergency response teams in both India and the UK.

Speaking to Parliament, Lammy confirmed:

“We know that British nationals were on board, and I can confirm that the Foreign Office is working urgently with local authorities to support British nationals and their families. Crisis teams are now in place in both Delhi and London.”

Authorities are continuing to investigate the cause of the crash. More updates are expected as rescue and recovery efforts continue.

Source: BBC – British passenger in seat 11A survives India plane crash, reports say

The post British Man Survives Air India Crash That Killed Over 200 appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The crash of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner on Thursday, just minutes after takeoff from Ahmedabad, has once again cast a harsh spotlight on Boeing’s mounting troubles—both technical and financial. While the cause of the crash is still under investigation, the tragedy marks the first fatal crash involving a 787 since the model entered service in 2009.

The aircraft went down in a densely populated area, killing all 242 people on board and several on the ground. In the hours following the disaster, Boeing’s shares dropped more than 5% in pre-market trading, reigniting conversations about the company’s safety record and long-term viability.

The 787 Dreamliner: A Groundbreaking Jet With a Troubled History

When Boeing unveiled the 787 Dreamliner, it was hailed as a next-generation marvel—lighter, more fuel-efficient, and technologically advanced. One of its standout features was the use of lithium-ion batteries, which promised better energy storage and faster charging.

But that innovation came with risk. In 2013, the entire 787 fleet was grounded worldwide after a series of battery fires, raising serious concerns about the plane’s reliability. While Boeing fixed the battery issue and returned the aircraft to service, the incident marked an early crack in the Dreamliner’s reputation for safety.

Now, with the Air India crash—the first deadly incident involving a Dreamliner—those questions are back on the table.

Boeing’s Bigger Problem: The 737 MAX Legacy

Beyond the Dreamliner, Boeing has spent the past several years grappling with the fallout from the 737 MAX crisis, which claimed 346 lives in two separate crashes—one in Indonesia in 2018 and another in Ethiopia in 2019.

Investigations revealed that a faulty sensor triggered an automated flight control system that pushed the nose of the aircraft downward, overriding pilot inputs. Following the second crash, the 737 MAX was grounded globally for nearly two years while Boeing redesigned the flight control software and faced intense scrutiny from regulators.

Just last month, the U.S. Department of Justice struck a controversial deal allowing Boeing to avoid criminal prosecution over claims it misled regulators before the crashes.

And the problems haven’t stopped there. Earlier this year, a door plug blew off a 737 MAX operated by Alaska Airlines during flight, prompting the FAA to cap Boeing’s production rate at 38 jets per month—another blow to the company’s credibility.

A Financial Picture Deep in the Red

Boeing’s troubles aren’t limited to the tarmac. The company posted a staggering $11.8 billion loss in 2024, pushing its total losses since 2019 to over $35 billion.

These mounting losses were made worse by a major strike by machinists at Boeing’s Washington state plants in Renton and Everett, which temporarily shut down production and delayed deliveries to customers worldwide.

Falling Behind: Boeing vs. Airbus

With stepped-up government scrutiny and ongoing labor issues, Boeing has fallen behind its chief rival, Airbus, in aircraft deliveries. In 2024, Boeing managed to deliver just 348 commercial jets, down from 528 the year before.

Airbus, by contrast, delivered 766 aircraft in 2023 alone—more than double Boeing’s output.

Yet Customers Still Want Boeing Jets

Despite all the setbacks, Boeing hasn’t lost its appeal entirely. Just last month, it announced massive new orders from Middle Eastern carriers, including a $96 billion deal with Qatar Airways for 787s and 777X wide-body aircraft—the largest 787 order in Boeing’s history.

These orders suggest that while the company is reeling from one crisis after another, many airlines still see Boeing jets as essential to their future fleets—especially for long-haul routes where the 787 is known for efficiency.

Why It Matters

The crash of Air India Flight AI171 isn’t just a tragic outlier—it’s part of a broader pattern that paints a worrying picture of a once-dominant company fighting to restore public trust.

From technical flaws and fatal crashes to labor unrest and multi-billion-dollar losses, Boeing is navigating a storm that has shaken confidence in modern aviation safety, corporate accountability, and the regulatory system meant to keep passengers safe.

The investigation into the cause of the Air India crash is just beginning. But for Boeing, the questions are already piling up—and the world is watching.

Source: AP News – A look at Boeing’s recent troubles after Air India crash

The post Boeing Under Fire Again After Deadly Dreamliner Crash appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Travelers flying in and out of Newark Liberty International Airport can expect limited flight operations to continue through June, as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) works to resolve ongoing air traffic control issues and technical failures.

The FAA announced Tuesday that it will extend hourly flight caps—28 arrivals and 28 departures per hour—that were originally imposed after a radar and radio communication outage on April 28. The disruption, which temporarily left air traffic controllers unable to see or speak to planes, triggered significant delays and prompted several controllers to take trauma leave.

Flight Limits in Place Through June

While normal operations previously allowed 38 to 39 flights per hour, the current cap ensures remaining controllers at the Philadelphia center—which manages Newark’s air traffic—can manage traffic safely.

There is a possibility the FAA will raise the limit to 34 arrivals and 34 departures by mid-June, pending the return of personnel and completion of a major runway construction project.

What Caused the Disruptions?

The first outage stemmed from a failure in the main fiber-optic line delivering radar data from an FAA site in New York to the Philadelphia control center. The backup line failed to activate immediately, leaving controllers without radar or communications for nearly 90 seconds.

Similar failures occurred again on May 9 and May 11, although backup systems worked faster in those cases. A fourth glitch on May 13 briefly cut radio contact for two seconds but left radar intact.

Staffing Shortages Deepen the Crisis

In addition to the technical issues, the Philadelphia control center has been stretched thin after five to seven air traffic controllers went on a 45-day trauma leave following the April incident. The staffing shortage forced the FAA to scale back flights even more during periods of high sick leave.

FAA Scrambles for Long-Term Fixes

The FAA says it has made short-term improvements, including software updates and installing new fiber-optic cables, which appear to have stabilized the system—for now.

But a long-term fix, including building a new radar system in Philadelphia, could take months. Even then, aging infrastructure may continue to pose challenges.

“Our goal is to relieve the substantial inconvenience to the traveling public from excessive flight delays due to construction, staffing challenges, and recent equipment issues,” said Acting FAA Administrator Chris Rocheleau.

A National Wake-Up Call

The Newark crisis has spotlighted broader issues within America’s air traffic control system. Earlier this month, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy unveiled a multibillion-dollar modernization plan. The House has tentatively allocated $12.5 billion toward the effort—an amount officials describe as just the beginning of what’s needed.

Smoother Operations—For Now

Despite the hurdles, operations at Newark have improved in recent days, with fewer cancellations and delays as airlines scale back schedules to meet FAA-imposed limits.

Until the underlying issues are fully addressed, though, travelers should prepare for continued scheduling changes and potential delays at one of the country’s busiest airports.

Source: AP News – FAA extends flight limits at Newark airport into June because of controller shortage and tech issues

The post FAA Extends Newark Flight Limits Due to Controller Shortage appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A Lufthansa flight carrying 205 people was left without an active pilot for 10 tense minutes after the copilot fainted while alone in the cockpit, according to a recent report from Spain’s air accident investigation agency, CIAIAC.

The incident occurred on February 17, 2024, during a flight from Frankfurt, Germany, to Seville, Spain. The captain had stepped out of the cockpit for a bathroom break, leaving the copilot alone at the controls. That’s when the copilot suddenly lost consciousness.

Despite the alarming situation, the Airbus A321 remained in stable flight thanks to autopilot. However, investigators noted that the unconscious copilot unintentionally interacted with the controls during this time. Audio recordings confirmed sounds consistent with what they called a “sudden and severe incapacitation.”

Air traffic controllers attempted to contact the cockpit multiple times but received no response. The captain returned and initially tried to re-enter using the standard door code, which alerts those inside with a chime. After five unsuccessful attempts and an unanswered intercom call, the captain used an emergency override code to regain access to the flight deck and took over the controls.

According to the report, the copilot received immediate first aid from the crew and a doctor who happened to be onboard. He eventually regained consciousness and later recalled receiving treatment.

The captain diverted the flight to Madrid’s Adolfo Suárez Madrid-Barajas Airport, landing safely about 20 minutes later. The copilot was taken to a hospital, where he stayed for several hours.

Investigators later discovered that the copilot’s fainting episode was caused by an undiagnosed neurological condition. This condition had not been detected during his routine medical evaluations. As a result, his medical certification has been suspended.

Lufthansa acknowledged the findings and confirmed that its own safety team had conducted a separate investigation, though the results were not publicly shared, according to German news agency dpa and the Associated Press.

The Spanish aviation authority classified the incident as an “extraordinary circumstance,” but emphasized that airline captains are trained to handle situations involving pilot incapacitation.

While rare, such incidents do happen. CIAIAC pointed to 287 reported cases of pilot incapacitation across European commercial flights between 2019 and 2024. For comparison, a 2004 FAA report documented 39 such cases involving U.S. airline pilots over a six-year span from 1993 to 1998.

Source: CNN – Lufthansa flight flew without a pilot for 10 minutes after copilot fainted, report finds

The post Lufthansa Flight Left Without Pilot for 10 Minutes After Copilot Faints appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.