Massive Infrastructure Growth Since 2020

Satellite analysis shows that more than 60% of 136 facilities connected to China’s missile programs or the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) have undergone significant construction or expansion since 2020. Collectively, these developments amount to over 21 million square feet of new floor space, transforming once-rural areas into vast military-industrial complexes.

Many of these sites — ranging from research centers and testing zones to full-scale production factories — now feature new towers, bunkers, and blast walls. In some images, partially assembled missile components can be seen on tarmacs, underlining the pace and scope of China’s build-up.

“This is China positioning itself as a global superpower,” said William Alberque, a senior adjunct fellow at the Pacific Forum and former NATO director of arms control. “We’re witnessing the early stages of a new arms race.”

Xi Jinping’s Vision for a World-Class Military

Since assuming power in 2012, Chinese President Xi Jinping has directed enormous resources toward transforming the People’s Liberation Army into what he calls a “world-class” fighting force. The PLARF, which oversees China’s growing nuclear and ballistic missile stockpile, has become central to Beijing’s defense doctrine. Xi has described the force as the “core of strategic deterrence” and a “cornerstone of national security.”

China’s missile facilities now supply nearly all branches of the country’s armed forces, the largest in the world with more than two million active personnel. According to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), China’s nuclear arsenal has expanded by roughly 100 new warheads annually since 2023 — the fastest growth rate among nuclear-armed nations — though it remains far smaller than the arsenals of the United States and Russia.

Rising Global Tensions and US Policy Shifts

The expansion comes as Washington grapples with supply chain bottlenecks and defense production challenges. The United States has recently faced shortages of key missile defense systems after deploying sophisticated interceptors to aid Ukraine and Israel. CNN reported that by mid-2025, about 25% of US THAAD interceptors had been used in defense operations, prompting the Pentagon to boost contracts with Lockheed Martin by more than $2 billion to replenish supplies.

While the US remains militarily dominant, analysts warn that China’s rapid production growth could eventually narrow the technological and numerical gap. “Beijing is not just catching up; it’s building for sustained parity,” said Alberque. “They’re sprinting now, but planning for a marathon.”

Accelerated Expansion Following Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

Analysts suggest that Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 served as a catalyst for China’s missile buildup. CNN’s geospatial analysis indicates that the pace of expansion at Chinese missile sites nearly doubled in the two years following the outbreak of the war. Observers believe Beijing has closely studied the conflict to refine its own strategic calculations.

“They’re watching Ukraine incredibly closely,” said Alberque. “China is learning how modern wars are fought — from drone swarms to precision missile strikes — and adapting those lessons for future conflicts.”

Strategic Focus on Taiwan and Regional Deterrence

Experts say the surge in missile production could be tied to potential military operations involving Taiwan, the self-governed island that Beijing claims as its territory. The new missiles are believed to play a vital role in China’s “anti-access/area-denial” (A2/AD) strategy — a plan to deter or delay US intervention in any Taiwan conflict by threatening US bases and naval forces in the region.

“The PLA wants to set the conditions for an invasion of Taiwan,” said Decker Eveleth, a research analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses. “That means targeting ports, bases, and supply hubs that could support US or allied operations.”

Inside the New Missile Complexes

CNN identified 99 industrial sites linked to missile production and another 37 PLARF bases. Of these, 65 manufacturing facilities and 22 bases showed significant new construction since 2020. Much of this growth centers around the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) and the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC), both state-owned conglomerates that dominate the country’s defense sector.

In one example, a CASC subsidiary in Shaanxi province — known for its solid-fuel rocket programs — was found to be developing a new facility surrounded by blast walls, a common safety feature in weapons manufacturing. Another site in Beijing expanded by nearly 50% and is associated with the DF-26 medium-range ballistic missile, often dubbed the “Guam killer” for its potential to strike US bases in the Pacific.

A variant of this missile, the DF-26D equipped with a hypersonic glide vehicle, was showcased at a 2025 military parade, signaling China’s ambitions in next-generation weapons technology.

Budget Expansion and Transparency Concerns

In 2025, Beijing approved a 7.2% increase in its defense budget — the fourth consecutive year of growth above 7% — bringing official military spending to about $245 billion. Western analysts, however, believe China’s actual expenditures are significantly higher due to opaque accounting and classified programs.

Meanwhile, a sweeping anti-corruption campaign within the PLA has resulted in the dismissal of several senior officers linked to the Rocket Force, including two former defense ministers. The campaign, analysts say, reflects both an effort to tighten control and concerns about the force’s operational readiness.

A Growing Global Security Challenge

Arms control experts warn that China’s expansion is reshaping the global balance of power and complicating efforts to negotiate new nuclear or conventional weapons agreements. “We are already in a new cold war,” said David Santoro, president of the Pacific Forum. “The danger is that it could escalate into open conflict.”

As China deepens its strategic capabilities and the US confronts production strains, global security analysts are calling for renewed diplomatic engagement to prevent further escalation. For now, the world’s major powers appear to be on diverging paths — with China expanding its arsenal, the US struggling to replenish its stockpiles, and the arms race intensifying once again across the Pacific.

Source: CNN – ‘A new arms race’: Satellite images, maps and records reveal huge surge in China’s missile production sites

The post China Expands Missile Production Sites Amid Growing US Tensions appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published Time: 08-11-2025, 10:15

Australia’s recent announcement to purchase 11 advanced Mogami-class frigates from Japan marks a significant development in Pacific security dynamics. This $6.5 billion agreement aims to bolster Australia’s naval strength amid rising regional tensions, while also positioning Japan as a major player in the global defense export market. Experts suggest the deal not only enhances Canberra’s maritime power but also reflects broader strategic shifts involving key U.S. allies.

Australia’s Strategic Frigate Acquisition: A New Maritime Force Emerges

The Australian Defense Ministry confirmed the purchase of 11 Mogami-class frigates, stealth-equipped surface combatants built by Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. These ships are widely regarded as among the most advanced in the world, with capabilities on par with or exceeding similar vessels deployed by China and even the United States.

Pat Conroy, Australia’s Minister for Defense Industry, emphasized the significance of the acquisition: “This is another step towards delivering a much larger and more lethal navy, with stealth frigates that will reassure our allies and deter our adversaries.”

The decision reflects Canberra’s growing concerns about China’s increasing military presence in the Pacific. Earlier in 2025, a Chinese naval task force conducted live-fire exercises near Australian shores, disrupting civilian air traffic and heightening regional anxieties.

Enhanced Capabilities of the Upgraded Mogami-Class Frigates

The frigates ordered by Australia will be an upgraded version of the Mogami-class currently in service with Japan’s Maritime Self-Defense Force. These ships are larger and feature improved firepower and endurance, with an unrefueled range of approximately 11,500 miles—roughly half the length of the Earth’s equator.

The vessels will be equipped with 32 Mk 41 vertical launch system (VLS) cells, capable of firing a variety of surface-to-air and anti-ship missiles. According to the Australian Defense Ministry, this gives the Mogami-class frigates the capacity to launch up to 128 air defense missiles, a fourfold increase over existing Australian surface ships.

The Mk 41 VLS can also accommodate Tomahawk cruise missiles, with a 1,000-mile range, significantly extending the frigates’ strike capabilities. Additionally, these launch cells support long-range anti-submarine rockets, enhancing their ability to detect and engage nuclear-powered submarines.

Efficiency and Crew Advantages

A notable feature of the Mogami-class frigates is their lean crew requirement. Each ship operates with approximately 90 personnel, compared to 170 on the ANZAC-class frigates they will replace. This reduced manpower need addresses recruitment challenges faced by both Australia and Japan.

Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles praised the design’s efficiency, stating, “It’s a much bigger ship, which is able to operate with a much smaller crew, and that’s a reflection of how modern this ship is.”

Regional Comparison: How the Mogami-Class Stacks Up

Defense analysts regard the Mogami-class as a competitive and technologically advanced option compared to other regional frigates. Alessio Patalano, professor of war and strategy in East Asia at King’s College London, highlighted its “stealth, reduced manning, and modularity” combined with affordability.

Carl Schuster, former US Navy captain and ex-head of the US Pacific Command’s Joint Intelligence Center, described the Mogami-class as “slightly superior” to China’s Type 054B frigates, especially regarding mid- to long-range air defense capabilities.

Sidharth Kaushal, sea power researcher at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), emphasized the importance of advanced software and sonar technology onboard, which can enhance target detection and discrimination beyond raw firepower.

Japan’s Reputation for Quality and Reliability

Japan’s shipbuilding industry is recognized for its precision and timely delivery. Schuster praised Japanese shipyards, stating, “They deliver products on time and within budget.” Patalano noted Japan’s longstanding “high-quality pipeline approach” to shipbuilding and access to advanced domestic and U.S. technology, with current Mogami frigates powered by British engines.

Japan’s Expanding Role as a Defense Exporter

This deal signals Japan’s growing presence in the global defense market, a notable shift after decades of strict post-World War II restrictions on arms exports. Japan has recently allowed sales of surveillance and rescue equipment to allies like the Philippines and has started exporting lethal weaponry, such as Patriot missile interceptors built under license for the U.S.

The Australian frigate contract dwarfs previous sales, with the first three ships to be constructed in Japan and the remaining eight built in Australia—a move that also supports domestic shipbuilding and job creation.

Exporting both the ships and the associated technology, analysts say, could position Japan as a major defense industry exporter. Patalano observed that successfully delivering this project “would catapult Japan in the space of major defense industry exporters.”

Lessons for the United States and Allied Cooperation

The Australia-Japan deal also underscores challenges facing the U.S. Navy, which currently lacks frigates after retiring its last Oliver Hazard Perry-class ship in 2015. The U.S. is developing new Constellation-class frigates, but construction delays and design revisions have pushed the program years behind schedule.

Schuster and Patalano agree that the Mogami-class may outperform the upcoming U.S. frigates in terms of agility and technological sophistication, highlighting how close U.S. allies are innovating faster in naval shipbuilding.

Economic and Strategic Impact for Australia

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s government views the frigate purchase as part of a broader defense investment expected to create 10,000 domestic jobs. The acquisition complements the AUKUS trilateral partnership between Australia, the U.S., and the U.K., which includes plans for Australia to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines.

Australia anticipates the new warships will be operational by 2029, providing a significant boost to its maritime defense capabilities amid intensifying regional competition.

Historical Context: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries’ Naval Legacy

The contract also marks Mitsubishi Heavy Industries’ return to the global naval market. The company is historically renowned for building the largest battleships ever constructed—the Yamato and Musashi—during the buildup of the Imperial Japanese Navy before World War II.

Though these battleships were technologically advanced for their era, the rise of aircraft carriers rendered them strategically obsolete. The Musashi was sunk in 1944 during the Battle of Leyte Gulf, and the Yamato was destroyed in 1945 during a planned defense operation.

Conclusion

Australia’s $6.5 billion acquisition of Japan’s Mogami-class frigates represents a strategic step toward enhancing its naval power and securing its position in the contested Pacific region. The deal also highlights Japan’s emergence as a key defense exporter, reflecting shifting dynamics among U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific.

Source: CNN – Japan is selling top-of-the-line warships to another key US ally. What that means for the highly contested Pacific

The post Australia’s $6.5 Billion Deal for Japanese Mogami-Class Warships Signals Shift in Pacific Maritime Power appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published Time: 08-09-2025, 14:00 (U.S. Eastern Time)

Russia has built a large-scale drone manufacturing facility in Alabuga, Tatarstan, that now produces the Iranian-designed Shahed-136 drones almost entirely domestically. This development marks a significant shift in military-industrial collaboration between Moscow and Tehran, with analysts noting a growing rift as Russia increasingly sidelines Iran in production and control over the weapon.

Russia’s drone war effort in Ukraine has heavily relied on the Shahed-136 drone, originally developed in Iran. But recent reports show Moscow is no longer dependent on Iranian imports and is instead scaling up local production at the Alabuga facility, integrating nearly all manufacturing stages into Russia’s military industrial complex.

Alabuga: Russia’s Drone Production Powerhouse

Located about 600 miles east of Moscow, the Alabuga factory specializes in the mass production of drones based on the Shahed-136 design. As featured in a recent Russian TV documentary, the facility has achieved near-complete localization of components. CEO Timur Shagivaleev described how aluminum bars, carbon fiber, fiberglass, microelectronics, and two-stroke engines are now all produced onsite.

According to Western intelligence sources, about 90% of the drone manufacturing process now takes place at Alabuga and other Russian plants. This shift not only accelerates output but reduces costs significantly, with the price per drone reportedly falling from $200,000 in 2022 to approximately $70,000 in 2025.

Satellite imagery shows the factory expanding rapidly, with new production lines and staff dormitories indicating a planned surge in drone output. Some analysts believe Russia may eventually export upgraded versions of these drones, possibly even back to Iran.

Strained Relations: Tehran’s Growing Discontent

Despite their initial partnership, Iranian officials have grown increasingly frustrated with what they see as Moscow’s transactional approach and limited returns from cooperation. Tehran has supplied Russia with drones, missiles, and other military assets since the invasion of Ukraine, but Western intelligence sources suggest Russia’s expanding self-sufficiency has marginalized Iran’s role.

The tension became more apparent during Israel’s June 2025 bombing campaign targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, where Russia’s muted condemnation disappointed Tehran. Ali Akbar Dareini of Tehran’s Center for Strategic Studies noted Iran’s expectations for more robust Russian support have not been met, especially on the military and intelligence fronts.

Western analysts interpret Russia’s stance as purely pragmatic—engaging partners only as long as it suits their immediate interests, without deeper strategic commitment.

The $1.75 Billion Deal and Rapid Production Gains

Following the invasion’s onset, Russia inked a $1.75 billion deal with Iran to produce Shahed drones domestically. Initially slated to deliver 6,000 drones by September 2025, Russian factories surpassed this goal a year ahead of schedule, now churning out over 5,500 units monthly.

Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence has noted significant improvements in the drones’ technology, including enhanced communication systems, longer battery life, and larger warheads, making them deadlier and more challenging to intercept.

Loss of Iranian Control Over Shahed Drones

Experts highlight that Moscow’s localization of drone production undermines Iran’s control over the weapon’s design and manufacturing. The Western intelligence official CNN interviewed described this as a gradual “loss of control” for Tehran and suggested Russia aims to master the entire production cycle independently to avoid future reliance on Iranian cooperation.

Dareini echoed this sentiment, framing the Russia-Iran partnership as a blend of cooperation and competition, with both nations seeking to maximize their benefits.

Economic and Sanctions Challenges Impact Cooperation

Iranian companies involved in the drone production partnership, such as Sahara Thunder, have reportedly raised concerns about delayed payments and logistical hurdles, exacerbated by international sanctions constraining the Russian economy.

This economic friction adds to Tehran’s frustration, especially as promised transfers of Russian aeronautical technology have yet to materialize fully.

Potential for Renewed Military Support to Iran

Following a ceasefire with Israel, Iran is focused on rebuilding its military infrastructure. David Albright, a former UN weapons inspector and head of the Institute for Science and International Security, suggests Russia’s expanded drone production capacity at Alabuga could allow Moscow to supply updated Shahed drones back to Tehran.

Albright warned of the dangers posed by Iran potentially reverse-engineering improved drone technology from Russia, which could further destabilize regional security.

Additional Military Equipment Transfers

Open-source flight tracking indicates military cargo flights between Moscow and Tehran, including a recent trip by a Russian IL-76 transport aircraft. Though unconfirmed, Iranian reports suggest the shipment may have included components of the Russian S-400 air defense system.

Requests for comment from the Russian Ministry of Defense and Iranian government offices have not been answered.

Conclusion: A Complex but Enduring Partnership

While tensions between Moscow and Tehran are evident, analysts like Dareini believe Iran will ultimately continue to benefit from the military and technological cooperation. Despite disagreements, the relationship remains a vital strategic partnership for both countries amid shifting global alignments.

“Iran will get what it needs for its own security,” Dareini said, citing military hardware, economic collaboration, and technology transfers as ongoing pillars of their alliance.

Source: CNN – Russia built a massive drone factory to pump out Iranian-designed drones. Now it’s leaving Tehran out in the cold

The post Russia’s Massive Drone Factory Shifts Power from Iran as Alabuga Scales Shahed-136 Production appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Despite reaching a temporary trade truce with the United States, China is showing no signs of easing its grip on rare earth exports — a critical sector that Beijing continues to use as strategic leverage in ongoing geopolitical tensions.

As part of the 90-day agreement recently struck in Geneva, China pledged to suspend certain “non-tariff” countermeasures it had implemented since April 2. However, rare earth controls, imposed just two days later, remain untouched — leaving U.S. businesses in limbo.

What’s at Stake?

Rare earth elements like dysprosium and terbium are essential components in everything from smartphones and electric vehicles to advanced U.S. military systems like the F-35 jet and missile guidance platforms. China dominates the global supply, producing more than 60% of the world’s mined rare earths — and an even greater share of processed materials.

These minerals are not outright banned from export, but since April, Chinese authorities have required government-issued licenses for every single shipment. The bureaucratic bottleneck has caused weeks-long delays for industries that rely on a steady supply of rare earths — from tech manufacturers to defense contractors.

Conflicting Messages

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told Fox News that China had agreed to remove its rare earth countermeasures as part of the Geneva truce. “If they don’t do those things, we’re going to be back in a different situation,” he said.

But on the ground, industry insiders say the reality looks very different.

“There’s no real evidence China is pulling back,” said Jon Hykawy, president of industry advisory firm Stormcrow Capital. “These controls are meant to safeguard Chinese interests, especially in critical sectors.”

Gracelin Baskaran of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) echoed that view, calling China’s export licensing regime “here to stay” — possibly for the long term.

New Licenses, Not Looser Controls

After weeks of regulatory limbo, some Chinese companies have begun receiving export licenses under a “one batch, one license” system. This means a new permit is required for every shipment — no blanket approvals, no shortcuts.

Two Chinese producers confirmed they recently secured export permits for rare earth magnets used in high-performance applications like automotive and military equipment. One firm mentioned licenses had been granted for exports to Southeast Asia and Europe — including German automaker Volkswagen.

Still, insiders say there’s been no indication of an easing policy. Instead, China has doubled down on enforcement. On May 12 — the day the tariff cuts were announced — authorities launched a crackdown on mineral smuggling and held meetings with provincial regulators to tighten oversight across the supply chain.

U.S. Defense Firms in the Crosshairs?

Although China removed 28 U.S. companies from its export control blacklist — including aerospace and defense firms — it remains unclear whether Beijing will actually approve rare earth shipments destined for military use.

Exporters are now required to submit detailed information about end users, which may present hurdles for U.S. defense contractors bound by Pentagon confidentiality.

“China can easily delay or reject export licenses for national security reasons,” said Thomas Kruemmer of Ginger International Trade and Investment. “This gives Beijing control — and insight — into who’s getting what and for what purpose.”

James Kennedy, president of Three Consulting, said the licensing system effectively gives China “a looking glass” into U.S. industrial and military supply chains.

“You can still get the material,” he said, “but you’ll have to tell China exactly who it’s for — and that gives them a strategic advantage.”

Rare Earths as a Strategic Weapon

China’s dominance in rare earths — and its history of using that power in political disputes — is no secret. In 2010, Beijing halted shipments to Japan during a territorial spat. Last year, it banned exports of critical extraction technologies and added other key minerals like gallium and germanium to its restricted list.

Experts say the export controls are just another tool in China’s geopolitical playbook.

“Rare earths, cobalt, gallium — these are China’s strategic weapons,” Kennedy noted. “The uncertainty they create is just as powerful as an outright ban.”

And with Germany recently receiving some of the first export licenses for rare earth magnets, analysts say China may be using its licensing power to signal diplomatic preferences.

“By granting Volkswagen a license, China is sending a clear message,” said Baskaran of CSIS. “It’s reinforcing ties with Germany while keeping pressure on the U.S. intact.”

Bottom Line

Despite talk of cooperation, China is playing a long game when it comes to rare earths. The export controls may not be a full blockade — but they give Beijing immense power to regulate access, reward allies, and punish rivals.

As global supply chains grow more vulnerable, one thing is clear: China isn’t letting go of its rare earth grip anytime soon.

Source: CNN – China isn’t getting rid of its controls over rare earths, despite trade truce with US

The post China Keeps Tight Grip on Rare Earth Exports Despite Trade Truce appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The growing tensions between India and Pakistan may be giving the world its first close look at how Chinese-made weapons stack up against Western military technology — and investors in Chinese defense companies are already reacting.

Chinese Jets in the Spotlight

Pakistan claims it used Chinese-made J-10C fighter jets to shoot down multiple Indian warplanes, including advanced French-made Rafales, during a dramatic air battle earlier this week. While India has yet to confirm any losses, the allegation has electrified Chinese defense enthusiasts — and markets. Shares of China’s AVIC Chengdu Aircraft surged over 40% this week following the claims.

Though Beijing has remained tight-lipped, China, Pakistan’s top arms supplier, is undoubtedly watching events closely. A real-world test of its military exports could influence its global standing as a weapons provider.

A Test Decades in the Making

China hasn’t fought a major war in more than 40 years, but under Xi Jinping, it has poured billions into modernizing its military. Pakistan, long considered China’s closest ally, has been a major recipient of this new wave of military support.

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), China accounted for 81% of Pakistan’s arms imports in the last five years. These exports include everything from fighter jets and missiles to air-defense systems and surveillance radars — many developed jointly with Pakistani firms.

“This is more than a regional clash,” said Craig Singleton, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “It’s a live demonstration of how Chinese defense exports are reshaping power dynamics in South Asia.”

China vs. the West by Proxy

The conflict is increasingly being viewed as a proxy showdown between Chinese and Western arms. India has been moving closer to the United States and its allies, buying advanced equipment from France, Israel, and the U.S., while cutting back on its reliance on Russian hardware.

Meanwhile, Pakistan has turned almost entirely to China, ending its purchase of American weapons. The shift came after the U.S. cut military aid over concerns about terrorism and nuclear proliferation.

“China stepped into the vacuum the U.S. left behind,” said Siemon Wezeman, senior researcher at SIPRI. “It’s now Pakistan’s only reliable arms partner.”

The Aerial Clash: What We Know

According to Pakistani sources, 125 aircraft were involved in a large-scale aerial engagement on Wednesday. Pakistan claims its J-10C jets downed five Indian fighters — including three Rafales — at distances of over 100 miles.

India hasn’t commented on the claims, but a French defense source confirmed the loss of at least one Rafale jet, raising questions about the effectiveness of Chinese technology in modern warfare.

“If confirmed, it suggests Pakistan’s Chinese-supplied arsenal is more than holding its own against Western systems,” said defense analyst Bilal Khan of the Quwa Group.

Boost for Beijing’s Arms Industry

For China, the implications are significant. The J-10C, now Pakistan’s most advanced fighter alongside the JF-17 Block III, features modern avionics and radar systems. It’s considered a 4.5-generation fighter, comparable to the Rafale, though not quite at the level of stealth jets like the U.S. F-35 or China’s J-20.

Pakistan’s J-10CEs are reportedly paired with PL-15 air-to-air missiles, which have a range that rivals — or even exceeds — Western counterparts. This could explain how Pakistan was able to strike targets at long distances.

“If these results are true, it’s a powerful advertisement for China’s defense industry,” said Antony Wong, a military analyst based in Macau. “This could reshape the global arms market.”

Shares in AVIC Chengdu soared again on Thursday, fueled by speculation and nationalist pride on Chinese social media.

A Broader Power Struggle

This isn’t just about jets and missiles. It reflects a deeper strategic realignment. India and Pakistan have fought multiple wars since 1947, but today’s rivalry is unfolding in a new global context — one shaped by U.S.-China competition.

India, traditionally nonaligned, is now a central player in the U.S. strategy to counterbalance China. Meanwhile, Pakistan is fully integrated into China’s geopolitical orbit, including its Belt and Road Initiative.

“This is a proxy clash between two spheres of influence,” said Salman Ali Bettani, an international relations scholar in Islamabad.

Not All Victories Are Clear

Still, experts warn against jumping to conclusions. India’s losses, if real, could be the result of poor planning, bad intel, or conservative rules of engagement — not necessarily superior Chinese technology.

Fabian Hoffman, a researcher at the University of Oslo, pointed out that Indian aircraft may have underestimated the range of Pakistan’s PL-15 missiles or failed to respond effectively due to restrictive engagement protocols.

Meanwhile, India’s missile strikes reportedly hit multiple Pakistani targets — despite China-supplied air defenses — raising doubts about the reliability of those systems.

“If Chinese radar and missile systems failed to prevent Indian strikes, that’s not great PR for Beijing’s arms industry,” said Sajjan Gohel, a London-based defense expert.

What Happens Next?

Whether or not China’s weaponry outperformed Western hardware, the world is watching closely. The stakes are high not just for South Asia, but for China’s ambitions to become a top-tier global arms exporter.

With Russia’s role diminished due to its war in Ukraine, China is eager to expand into former Russian markets in Africa and the Middle East.

If Pakistan’s Chinese-made jets truly delivered a decisive performance, it could change how nations from Algeria to Iraq view their next weapons purchase.

For now, the India-Pakistan conflict is no longer just a regional issue — it’s become a proving ground for China’s rise as a global military power.

Source: CNN – China has spent billions developing military tech. Conflict between India and Pakistan could be its first major test

The post China’s Weapons Get Real Test in India-Pakistan Conflict appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

These obscure minerals, vital to everything from iPhones to fighter jets, have once again put China in the driver’s seat of global supply chains. And in this battle, former President Donald Trump — who launched the initial trade war — may find himself with little leverage.

Back in 2019, as Trump’s first trade war escalated, Chinese leader Xi Jinping paid a symbolic visit to a factory in Ganzhou, a city known for processing rare earth minerals. Xi declared these metals a “vital strategic resource,” a quiet but clear message: China holds the keys to the technologies of the future.

Fast forward to today — and that message is louder than ever.

While rare earths can be found in many countries, China dominates the supply chain. According to the International Energy Agency, it controls 61% of global mining and an astonishing 92% of processing. That’s the step that turns raw materials into usable components — and it’s where China has built an unshakable lead.

On April 4, China tightened its grip further by imposing new export controls on seven key rare earth minerals, including their alloys and magnet products. Companies must now get Beijing’s permission before shipping them out — a direct response to Trump’s 34% tariff hike on Chinese goods.

And the impact has been immediate.

Since the order took effect, at least five American and European companies have had rare earth magnet shipments halted in China, according to industry consultant John Ormerod.

“They were caught off guard,” Ormerod told CNN. “There’s a lot of confusion about the new licensing rules.”

It’s not just about paperwork. These magnets are essential for electric vehicles, military aircraft, and even MRI machines. Losing access to them — even briefly — can ripple through entire industries.

Joshua Ballard, CEO of USA Rare Earth, pointed out that the controls focus on “heavy” rare earths — the rarest, most expensive, and most controlled. “This is China’s best move,” he said. “They don’t have much leverage with tariffs, but here, they’ve got a hammer.”

China’s rare earth dominance didn’t happen overnight. It began in the 1950s but accelerated in the 1980s and 1990s, when China blended low labor costs and lax regulations with imported Western technologies.

By the early 2000s, Western manufacturers — unable to compete with China’s pricing and scale — exited the business. The U.S. lost not only its production base but also the expertise.

“Much of the know-how is gone,” said Ormerod. “It’s capital-intensive, and China simply out-invested everyone else.”

Today, the U.S. relies on China for around 70% of its rare earth imports.

This week, Trump ordered a federal investigation into critical mineral imports, citing national security risks tied to foreign dependency. But building a domestic supply chain won’t be easy — or fast.

Since 2020, the Pentagon has spent over $439 million trying to rebuild rare earth infrastructure. Its goal: a mine-to-magnet supply chain that can meet all U.S. defense needs by 2027.

Some U.S. companies see opportunity in China’s export crackdown.

Phoenix Tailings, a Massachusetts startup, claims it can refine rare earths with zero emissions — using only materials from the U.S., Canada, and Australia. CEO Nicholas Myers says they produce 40 metric tons per year now and aim for ten times that soon.

“It’s all domestic,” Myers said. “We don’t rely on China at all.”

USA Rare Earth is also scaling up, building a magnet plant in Texas and working on processing tech for its West Texas mine — a deposit rich in all the minerals China just restricted. But it’s still early days.

“The question is: how do we do this faster?” Ballard asked. “We’ve got the resources. Now we need speed.”

China’s move isn’t just a trade tactic — it’s a wake-up call. After years of warnings, American industries are feeling the pressure to reduce dependence on a single foreign supplier.

While the U.S. scrambles to catch up, China is sending a message loud and clear: In this tech-driven trade war, the side with the rare earths may have the rare advantage.

Source: CNN – China has a powerful card to play in its fight against Trump’s trade war

The post China’s Rare Earth Power Play in the Trade War with Trump appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Ukraine has announced the development of a laser weapon capable of shooting down aircraft from more than a mile away. The weapon, named Tryzub, was revealed by Vadym Sukharevskyi, the commander of Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces, at a defense summit in Kyiv this week. He shared that the laser can target and destroy aircraft flying at altitudes over 2 kilometers (1.2 miles).

Sukharevskyi confidently stated, “It truly works, it truly exists,” emphasizing that the weapon’s capabilities are actively being enhanced. The name Tryzub, meaning “trident” in Ukrainian, symbolizes the nation’s independence, strength, and unity.

While specific details about the Tryzub system were not provided, experts have suggested that the development of such a weapon is plausible. Patrick Senft, an expert at Armament Research Services, a consultancy focused on armament research, noted that directed-energy weapons (DEWs) like Tryzub are indeed achievable. “It is entirely feasible for Ukraine to develop a functional directed-energy weapon capable of destroying aerial targets,” Senft explained. He pointed out that commercial, off-the-shelf welding lasers, combined with other available technologies, could make this possible, similar to the U.S. Navy’s Laser Weapons System (LaWS), which has been operational since 2014.

How the Tryzub Laser Works and Its Effectiveness Against Drones

Directed-energy weapons like Tryzub are particularly effective against slow, low-flying drones, which are common in Russia’s aerial attacks. These drones are vulnerable to heat due to their fragile components. Senft explained that low-flying UAVs, like the Shahed-136/Geran-2 drones, are especially susceptible to sustained laser exposure due to their steady flight patterns. The weapon can concentrate energy on a specific point, targeting vital components of the drone.

However, Senft also highlighted key limitations of such systems. The speed of the target and the energy loss over distance pose challenges. Fast-moving or heat-resistant targets, such as artillery shells or ballistic missiles, require more advanced systems to neutralize.

Technical Challenges of Deploying Laser Systems

While the Tryzub laser may be effective against drones, Fabien Hoffmann, an expert from the Oslo Nuclear Project (ONP), noted several technical challenges in using lasers against drones or missiles. These challenges include ensuring sufficient laser beam strength, managing the cooling of the system, and dealing with atmospheric conditions like clouds, rain, or thermal blooming. Thermal blooming occurs when the laser beam heats the surrounding air, causing the energy to disperse and reducing its effectiveness.

“To assess how effective it is in a missile defense role, we’ll need to see how it performs in practice,” Hoffmann added.

Global Laser Weapons Development

Ukraine’s Tryzub joins a small group of nations that have developed or are developing laser weapons. The U.S., China, and Israel are known to have operational laser systems, with the UK also working on its own laser system, DragonFire. Set to be operational in 2027, the DragonFire system could potentially be deployed in Ukraine to counter Russian drones, according to former UK Defense Minister Grant Shapps.

As countries around the world continue to explore directed-energy weapons, the successful deployment and effectiveness of Ukraine’s Tryzub laser will be closely monitored as a potential game-changer in modern warfare.

Source

The post Ukraine’s Laser Weapon: A New Way to Fight Drones and Aircraft appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.