Trump signed the proclamation on October 23, 2026. The changes take effect on October 30, just four days before the November 3 midterm elections.

The decision could benefit farmers and businesses in Maine, where Republican Senator Susan Collins has pushed the administration to ease tariffs on products used by blueberry, potato, apple and seaweed producers.

But the move is selective. It does not end US tariffs on Canadian goods generally. The proclamation also adds other Canadian products to the additional tariff list, leaving parts of the wider trade dispute unresolved.

Which Canadian goods receive relief?

The White House says the proclamation removes specified products from the additional 50% duties imposed under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

The affected categories include plywood sheets, certain paper products, machinery, refrigeration and freezing equipment, and some packing crates and boxes. These products are used by businesses that depend on Canadian suppliers for equipment, packaging and production materials.

Senator Collins said the exemptions cover nine categories important to Maine’s agricultural and coastal industries. She highlighted the needs of blueberry, potato, apple and seaweed producers, who use Canadian products that may be difficult or expensive to replace with US alternatives.

The proclamation also adds certain valves, carpets, waste products and other goods to the additional tariff list. The exact coverage depends on the tariff classifications in its annexes. Not every product that falls under a broad description is necessarily covered.

The 50% tariff is not the only duty

The changes remove a specific additional tariff. They do not automatically eliminate every duty on the affected imports.

The proclamation states that the Section 338 duties apply in addition to tariffs imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Other applicable import duties and requirements may also remain.

The measure also applies to covered goods regardless of whether they qualify as originating under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, according to the White House fact sheet.

For importers, that means the October 30 change could lower the duty burden on eligible products without making those goods entirely tariff-free. Businesses must check the relevant tariff classification and other applicable duties before calculating their savings.

Why Maine businesses sought relief

Maine’s economy has close commercial ties with Canada. Farmers and processors often rely on cross-border supply chains for equipment and materials used during planting, harvesting, packing and storage.

Collins said she repeatedly raised the issue with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and other senior administration officials. She argued that some Canadian products were unavailable from US suppliers or would be costly to replace.

For blueberry producers, specialized boxes and harvesting equipment can be important during a short seasonal window. Potato and apple growers also rely on machinery, refrigeration and packaging to handle crops and prepare them for market. Seaweed businesses may benefit from changes affecting products and equipment used in processing and packaging.

The exemptions could reduce costs for businesses that import eligible goods directly or purchase them from suppliers who pass on some of the savings.

However, the scale of the benefit remains uncertain. It will depend on which products each business imports, how much it pays in duties, whether alternative suppliers are available and how companies adjust their prices.

No general reduction in retail prices should be assumed. Importers may use the savings to rebuild margins, absorb earlier cost increases, invest in their operations or lower prices. The outcome will vary by business and market.

How US importers pay tariffs

US import tariffs are generally collected from the importer of record when goods enter the country. Canadian exporters do not automatically pay the US duty directly to the US government.

The economic cost can still spread across the supply chain. An importer may absorb the duty, negotiate a lower price with its supplier, pass some of the cost to a US manufacturer or retailer, or raise prices for customers.

That is why the new exemptions could matter beyond the businesses named by Collins. A US company that uses Canadian packaging or machinery may face lower input costs if the goods it imports qualify for relief.

But the change does not guarantee that the full amount of the former tariff will be passed on to consumers. Contract terms, competition, inventory purchased before the effective date and the availability of alternative supplies can all affect the result.

The wider US-Canada trade dispute

The latest adjustment follows a breakdown in US-Canada trade negotiations earlier this year. The White House says Canada imposed new retaliatory tariffs on about $20 billion of US exports after talks stalled.

The Trump administration introduced the additional Section 338 duties in July and modified the covered products in September. Canada’s countermeasures and the continuing dispute have increased pressure on businesses that depend on cross-border trade.

The White House describes the new proclamation as an effort to offset the burden on US commerce while continuing to respond to what it calls discriminatory Canadian trade measures.

That is the administration’s stated rationale. The proclamation does not represent a comprehensive trade agreement, and the targeted exemptions do not resolve the broader disagreement over tariffs and retaliation.

Trump said on October 23 that Canada was working toward a trade deal with the United States. The status and terms of any wider agreement remain important questions for businesses planning future imports and exports.

Political significance ahead of the midterms

The announcement comes at a sensitive point in the US election calendar. Collins is seeking another Senate term in Maine, where her race against Democrat Troy Jackson is closely watched.

Collins publicly claimed credit for pressing the administration to provide relief. She said she had raised the burden on Maine businesses and families and would continue to seek further exemptions and a broader trade agreement.

Her Democratic challenger has criticized the limited nature of the relief, arguing that selective exemptions do not resolve the wider economic pressures caused by the tariffs.

The decision may give Collins an opportunity to demonstrate that she can influence trade policy. Reporting has also highlighted the potential benefit for other Republicans in states where businesses and voters have been affected by the dispute with Canada.

However, the timing alone does not establish that the administration designed the change to influence election results. The White House says it is adjusting tariffs to protect US commerce and respond to Canadian measures. Claims about electoral motives should remain attributed to the people making them unless further evidence establishes the administration’s intent.

The broader political issue is whether targeted relief can ease pressure on particular industries while the administration maintains its wider tariff strategy. Businesses that remain exposed to the duties may see little benefit from the changes.

What businesses should check before October 30

Importers should review the tariff classifications listed in the proclamation’s annexes and confirm whether their products qualify for removal from the additional 50% duty.

They should also check the entry date, any applicable Section 232 duties and other import requirements. Goods that do not match the listed classifications may remain subject to the additional tariff.

Businesses should not assume that a product is exempt simply because it is used by a farm, processor or manufacturer named in public statements. Eligibility depends on the legal product descriptions and tariff codes.

Canadian suppliers and US buyers may also need to revisit contracts, pricing and delivery schedules. The effective date could affect new shipments differently from goods already imported or entered for consumption.

Selective relief, not an end to the tariff dispute

The October 23 proclamation offers a limited change to the additional tariffs on Canadian goods. It could help Maine producers and other US businesses that rely on eligible packaging, machinery and materials.

The actual benefit will depend on product eligibility, import costs and how companies distribute the savings. Other tariffs may continue to apply, and the administration has added different Canadian products to the additional duty list.

With the midterm elections approaching, the announcement carries political significance. But its broader economic impact will depend on how businesses respond and whether the United States and Canada make further progress toward a trade agreement.

Reporting Credit: The White House — October 23, 2026, presidential proclamation and fact sheet modifying additional tariffs on Canadian products. Senator Susan Collins — statements on tariff relief for Maine agricultural and coastal industries. Reuters, Associated Press and CBS News — reporting on the exemptions, trade dispute and political context.

The post White House Eases Tariffs on Selected Canadian Goods Ahead of US Midterms appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The order, signed during Trump’s campaign rally in Grand Island, directs the Treasury Department to defer the federal excise tax applicable to on-road use of dyed diesel through the end of 2026 without interest or penalties. It also directs Treasury to explore ways to eliminate the obligation to pay the deferred tax.

The federal diesel excise tax is 24.4 cents per gallon. The White House said the measure could save truckers about $60 on a 250-gallon fill from the federal component alone, while savings could exceed $100 where states adopt corresponding measures.

The order also directs the Transportation Department to coordinate with states, industry and labor organizations on access to dyed diesel. The Agriculture Department is instructed to help ensure farmers can obtain the fuel in high-demand areas and encourage states to take similar action.

The policy concerns diesel commonly known as red-dyed or dyed diesel because a federal dye requirement distinguishes fuel intended for tax-exempt uses such as agriculture, construction and heating from diesel subject to highway taxes.

Trump said the order would allow broader use of the fuel and reduce costs for truckers and farmers. The White House has attributed the recent increase in diesel prices to constrained global supply and reduced refining capacity.

But the tax change does not by itself resolve the underlying supply pressures affecting fuel markets. Analysts cited in current reporting have questioned how much the measure will reduce prices because the principal pressure on diesel markets is supply rather than the federal fuel tax.

Nebraska had already moved to provide temporary relief before the federal action. Gov. Jim Pillen issued executive orders in September allowing highway-registered vehicles in the state to hold, sell or use untaxed dyed diesel without state fines or penalties. The state measures were intended to provide relief during the agricultural harvest season and remain temporary.

The federal action therefore expands a policy approach that several states had already begun using as diesel prices climbed. Other states have also taken steps to ease restrictions or provide temporary fuel-tax relief.

The timing of Trump’s announcement adds a significant political dimension. He signed the order in Nebraska during a campaign stop for Republican candidates, less than a month before the Nov. 3 midterm elections. The administration has increasingly focused on fuel and grocery costs as economic issues affecting voters.

Trump was campaigning alongside Nebraska Republican leaders, including Sen. Pete Ricketts, as part of a broader series of rallies before the election. His administration has presented the diesel action as an affordability measure rather than as an election-related policy.

The distinction between a tax deferral and a permanent tax repeal remains important. The executive order does not itself permanently eliminate the federal diesel excise tax. Instead, it directs Treasury to defer collection through the end of the year and examine possible pathways for eliminating the deferred liability.

The order also does not automatically eliminate state fuel taxes. State governments must take their own action for state-level taxes or restrictions to change, which is why the White House is encouraging states to adopt policies corresponding to the federal action.

For farmers, the practical effect may be less significant than for highway users because qualifying agricultural and other off-road uses of dyed diesel were already generally exempt from the federal highway fuel tax. The new policy primarily changes access to that fuel for uses that would ordinarily require taxed on-road diesel.

The immediate question for the fuel market is whether broader access to dyed diesel can provide meaningful relief while supplies remain constrained. The administration has presented the policy as temporary assistance for farmers, truckers and other diesel users, while the broader market remains dependent on fuel availability, refining capacity and global energy conditions.

The next developments will include how Treasury implements the tax deferral, how states respond to the federal request and whether expanded access produces measurable savings for highway diesel users before the end of 2026.

Reporting Credit: White House; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Nebraska Governor’s Office.

The post Trump Signs Order Allowing Tax-Free Red-Dyed Diesel for Highway Use appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The national average price for diesel reached $6.5276 a gallon on Sept. 22, according to AAA, the highest recorded average in its current series. The price was $3.6933 a year earlier and has risen by more than 73% since then.

The increase has coincided with a wider disruption in global refined-fuel markets following the war involving Iran and continuing disruption affecting Russian energy supplies.

The political response has been particularly visible among Republicans representing rural and agricultural constituencies. Several have called for measures intended to increase domestic diesel availability, including restricting exports.

The administration, however, has not adopted a blanket export ban.

Diesel has become a broader economic problem

Diesel is used extensively by the trucking, farming, construction, manufacturing and logistics industries.

That gives the price of diesel a wider economic effect than the cost of filling a passenger vehicle. Higher fuel expenses can increase the cost of transporting food and manufactured goods, operating agricultural equipment and moving freight.

The Energy Information Administration said the current increase is being driven by tight global distillate supplies and elevated crude-oil prices.

Global refining activity has been reduced in Russia, China and the Middle East, according to the EIA. Lower international production has raised global distillate prices and increased demand for U.S. diesel exports.

U.S. refineries have responded with high production.

Domestic distillate production averaged about 5.1 million barrels a day from January through August, the highest level for that period since 2019. Refinery utilization reached 97% during the week ending Sept. 11.

But high production has not eliminated the supply pressure.

U.S. distillate inventories were 13% below their five-year seasonal average as of Sept. 11, according to EIA. The agency expects inventories to remain below the five-year range through the end of 2026 and most of 2027.

Rural Republicans demand intervention

The price increase has created an unusual political problem for Republicans representing farming and trucking regions.

Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley called on President Donald Trump to suspend diesel exports, arguing that domestic fuel supplies should receive priority.

Republican Reps. Ashley Hinson and Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa also called for government action to reduce fuel costs. Their proposals included restricting exports and providing assistance to farmers and truckers.

Other Republicans have similarly focused on the cost of diesel in agricultural states.

The issue is particularly significant for farmers because diesel is used to operate tractors, combines and other heavy equipment. Harvest-season demand can also increase at the same time that refineries traditionally enter seasonal maintenance periods.

EIA expects that combination to contribute to continued price pressure during the fall and winter.

The administration faces a trade-off over exports

The debate over diesel exports reflects a basic problem in the U.S. fuel market.

American refiners produce more distillate than the domestic market consumes at some times of the year, allowing the United States to export substantial quantities.

Those exports also connect U.S. refiners to international prices.

EIA said U.S. distillate net exports have remained near or above the previous five-year high during every month of 2026 since February. Rising exports have contributed to declining domestic inventories.

Republicans seeking an export restriction argue that retaining more fuel inside the United States could increase domestic supply and reduce costs for American consumers.

But the policy has potential international and domestic consequences.

The Congressional Research Service has previously noted that restricting refined-petroleum exports could tighten international markets and potentially increase prices for foreign supplies imported into the United States. The United States normally exports more distillate than it imports.

The Trump administration has therefore faced pressure from lawmakers seeking immediate domestic relief while also considering the broader effects of restricting exports.

A blanket export ban remains off the table

Trump has indicated support for efforts to restrict diesel exports, but Energy Secretary Chris Wright said Wednesday that the administration would not impose a blanket ban.

The administration’s position leaves open the possibility of more targeted measures while rejecting a complete prohibition on exports.

The distinction matters because the United States is itself part of the global diesel supply system.

A broad restriction could increase domestic availability under some market conditions, but it could also reduce supplies available to international buyers and change incentives for refiners.

The effectiveness of an export restriction would also depend on refinery capacity, crude availability, inventories and the duration of the Middle East disruption.

Iran war remains central to the price shock

The current diesel surge is not caused by a single factor.

The EIA identifies global distillate production, crude prices, refining margins, inventories and international trade flows as major components of the market.

The war involving Iran has nevertheless disrupted one of the world’s most important oil-producing regions and affected transportation through the Middle East.

EIA’s September outlook assumes that normal tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz will resume in the near term. Under that assumption, additional Middle Eastern distillate exports and increased crude availability for Asian refineries would gradually reduce global refining pressure. If those flows remain constrained beyond 2026, the agency says global distillate crack spreads could be higher than its current forecast.

The longer the disruption lasts, the harder it becomes for U.S. refiners and other producers to compensate for the missing supply.

Republicans are now confronting the issue on the campaign trail

The fuel crisis arrives as candidates prepare for the November midterm elections.

Republicans in competitive races have increasingly spoken about the war’s economic consequences, with some calling for an end to the conflict and others demanding domestic measures to reduce fuel costs.

The issue reaches beyond gasoline.

Diesel is particularly important in rural areas because of its role in agriculture and freight transportation. A sustained increase can therefore affect both the operating costs of businesses and the prices consumers eventually pay for transported goods.

Recent polling has also found that fuel affordability is a concern among Republican voters. An earlier AP-NORC survey found that about six in 10 Republicans were at least somewhat concerned about their ability to afford gasoline in the following months as the Iran war pushed energy prices higher.

That polling predates the latest diesel record and should not be interpreted as a direct measure of current voter attitudes toward diesel or the midterms.

The political response is becoming more visible

The difference between the administration’s position and the demands of some Republican lawmakers illustrates the difficulty of managing the price shock.

Republican candidates and lawmakers are not taking a single position.

Some have called for ending the Iran war. Others are seeking export restrictions or financial assistance for affected industries. The administration has pursued additional measures while resisting a blanket diesel-export ban.

The policy debate is therefore shifting from whether fuel prices are a problem to which costs should be absorbed by which part of the economy.

Restricting exports could potentially increase domestic availability, but it could also affect international supplies.

Subsidies or direct assistance could reduce costs for farmers and truckers but would shift some of the burden to taxpayers.

Increasing domestic production could add supply over time, but it cannot immediately replace barrels disrupted by international conflicts or refinery constraints.

The pressure could persist into 2027

The immediate political question is whether diesel prices will ease before voters go to the polls.

The market outlook provides no simple answer.

EIA expects global distillate production to remain below last year’s levels in coming months and U.S. inventories to remain unusually low. The agency expects prices to remain elevated, particularly during the period of seasonal refinery maintenance and higher agricultural demand.

The agency’s forecast also depends on an assumption that Middle Eastern tanker traffic normalizes.

A prolonged disruption would create additional pressure.

The political consequences will depend not only on the price at the pump but also on how voters experience the broader effects — from farm operating costs to freight rates and food prices.

For Republicans, the diesel surge has therefore become a concrete economic issue during an election year in which the cost of living is already central to the political debate.

The November elections will not be determined by diesel prices alone. But the record cost of the fuel is forcing Republican lawmakers and candidates to address a problem that is particularly visible in some of the constituencies most dependent on it.

Reporting Credit: U.S. Energy Information Administration — diesel pricing, distillate production, inventories, exports and market outlook; U.S. Department of Energy — administration policy and fuel-market actions; AAA — current U.S. retail diesel price data; U.S. Congress/ Congressional Research Service — analysis of diesel exports and potential domestic and international effects.

The post Record Diesel Prices Put Pressure on Republicans Ahead of Midterms appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Berry became one of America’s most influential literary voices on agriculture, land and community while remaining deeply connected to the Kentucky landscape that shaped his work. He published more than 40 books, including fiction, poetry and essays, and received major national honors during a career spanning more than six decades.

A writer who returned home

Berry was born in Henry County, Kentucky, in 1934 and grew up around his family’s farming tradition. He studied English at the University of Kentucky before receiving a Wallace Stegner Fellowship at Stanford University in 1958.

He later lived in New York and taught at several universities, but eventually returned to Kentucky and settled in Port Royal, where he farmed and wrote for much of the rest of his life.

His decision to remain closely connected to the land was central to his philosophy.

Berry believed that communities could not be understood separately from the farms, forests, rivers and local economies that sustained them. His writing repeatedly challenged the idea that economic growth and technological progress should come at the expense of those relationships.

The Unsettling of America became a landmark

Berry’s 1977 book “The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture” established him as a major critic of industrial agriculture.

He argued that the consolidation and mechanization of farming were damaging not only soil and ecosystems but also the knowledge, relationships and communities built around agriculture.

His broader argument was that food production should remain connected to people, place and responsibility rather than being treated solely as an industrial business.

The book became an important influence on later discussions about sustainable agriculture, local food systems and environmental conservation.

His fiction brought rural Kentucky to life

Berry’s literary work extended beyond essays about agriculture.

His novels and short stories created the fictional community of Port William, drawing heavily on the rural Kentucky world he knew.

Among his best-known works are “Nathan Coulter,” “A Place on Earth,” “Jayber Crow” and “Hannah Coulter.” His poetry collections included “A Timbered Choir: The Sabbath Poems 1979-1997.”

Through those works, Berry explored family, work, marriage, aging, death, faith and the changing relationship between people and the land.

His writing often resisted the speed and abstraction of modern life, instead emphasizing the value of knowing one’s neighbors and remaining accountable to a particular place.

He lived according to his principles

Berry did not simply write about a simpler life.

For decades, he and his wife, Tanya, operated a farm in Henry County. They deliberately avoided many modern technologies and lived without computers, television and telephones.

Berry also became an outspoken opponent of mountaintop-removal coal mining, protesting the environmental consequences of the practice in Kentucky and elsewhere. In 2011, he participated in a sit-in at the Kentucky governor’s office over strip mining.

His environmental activism was closely connected to his literary work: he viewed care for the land as both an ecological and moral responsibility.

A national literary figure

Although Berry remained rooted in rural Kentucky, his influence reached far beyond the state.

His ideas influenced writers, environmentalists, farmers and advocates of local food systems. Author Michael Pollan and chef and food activist Alice Waters were among those who publicly acknowledged his influence.

Berry received the National Humanities Medal from President Barack Obama in 2010 and was a member of the American Academy of Arts and Letters.

He also received the National Book Critics Circle’s lifetime achievement award in 2016, along with numerous other literary and cultural honors.

His views were sometimes controversial

Berry’s criticism of modern society extended into politics, religion, technology and American history.

Some of his positions generated controversy, including his views on historical memory and his opposition to removing a controversial mural at the University of Kentucky.

He also opposed the death penalty and protested U.S. military actions and environmental policies.

Those positions sometimes placed him at odds with institutions and political movements, but his writing remained focused on what he saw as the moral consequences of how people treated one another and the natural world.

A legacy rooted in place

Berry’s significance came partly from the consistency between his writing and his life.

He spent decades arguing that people should pay attention to where they live, how their food is produced, how communities function and what happens when economic systems separate people from the land that sustains them.

He remained in Kentucky while becoming a nationally recognized literary figure.

That connection to place became one of the defining characteristics of his career.

His death leaves behind a body of work that continues to influence debates over agriculture, conservation, rural communities and the meaning of a sustainable life.

What Happens Next

Berry is survived by his wife, Tanya, his children Mary Berry and Pryor “Den” Berry, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

Details of funeral and memorial arrangements were not immediately available in the sources reviewed for this report.

Key Facts

• Name: Wendell Berry
• Born: 1934
• Died: August 31, 2026
• Age: 92
• Home: Port Royal, Kentucky
• Profession: Author, poet, novelist, essayist and farmer
• Major work: The Unsettling of America
• Books: More than 40
• National Humanities Medal: 2010
• National Book Critics Circle lifetime achievement award: 2016
• Known for: Agrarianism, environmentalism, rural communities and criticism of industrial agriculture
• Status: DIED — OBITUARY

Reporting Credit: Family of Wendell Berry — confirmation of death; National Endowment for the Humanities — National Humanities Medal; University of Kentucky — academic history and biographical information; The Berry Center — Berry’s legacy, writings and agricultural advocacy.

The post Wendell Berry, Kentucky-Born Author Who Advocated a Simpler Life, Dies at 92 appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Lockdown Isolation Sparks a Vineyard Experiment

When the pandemic forced her studies at an agricultural college in Stellenbosch to pause, Jacka found herself confined to her parents’ home in Noordhoek, near Cape Town. The disruption, she said, prompted a shift in perspective, leading her to imagine transforming unused garden space into a working vineyard.

At 27, she began clearing land and planting more than 1,400 vines across two small blocks in her family’s garden overlooking the sea. The project marked an unusually early step into viticulture, typically a field that requires large-scale farms and years of development before any meaningful harvest.

A Micro-Vineyard in a Traditional Wine Landscape

Jacka’s vineyard stands in stark contrast to conventional wine farms in South Africa’s established wine regions, where tens of thousands of vines are the norm. Her experimental plot was designed for two varieties — a white blend and a syrah red — grown entirely within the boundaries of a suburban property.

Wine critics noted the scale of the undertaking as highly unconventional. Christian Eedes, editor of the South African wine review platform winemag.co.za, described the project as “a triumph of hope over good sense,” emphasizing the difficulty of producing fine wine and sustaining profitability on such a small scale.

From Family Garden to First Harvest

The project required extensive manual work, including clearing soil, sourcing vines, and individually staking each plant. Jacka was supported by her family, though early efforts were marked by trial and error, including mistakes during planting and challenges keeping the vineyard intact.

The small plot also faced unexpected obstacles, including damage from a miniature horse kept on the property, which reportedly consumed several vines. Despite setbacks, the vineyard eventually produced its first harvest after four years of development.

Critical Recognition for Craft Winemaking

The debut wines produced from the Noordhoek vineyard were met with strong praise from critics, marking a significant milestone for Jacka’s unconventional project. The recognition helped establish her growing reputation in South Africa’s competitive wine industry.

Eedes highlighted the project as an example of artisanal winemaking, describing it as a form of craft production that prioritizes care, intention, and limited output rather than mass-scale commercial production.

Expanding Beyond the Backyard Vineyard

While continuing to tend the micro-vineyard at her family home, Jacka has also expanded her winemaking work through her Alinea label, producing additional wines sourced from grapes grown across the Cape Town region, an area with a long-established wine tradition.

She continues to balance multiple roles in her small-scale operation, managing production, labeling, sales, and distribution herself as she builds on her early success.

Pandemic Disruption and Unexpected Opportunity

Jacka’s journey reflects a broader pattern of pandemic-era disruption reshaping personal and professional trajectories. What began as confinement during a global health crisis evolved into a long-term creative project rooted in agriculture, patience, and experimentation.

Wine critic commentary has underscored the unusual nature of the achievement, noting how a period of widespread uncertainty ultimately led to a distinctive contribution in South Africa’s craft wine scene.

Tags: South Africa, Cape Town, COVID-19 pandemic, winemaking, viticulture, craft wine, agriculture, Stellenbosch

The post COVID lockdown inspires Cape Town winemaker’s award-winning vineyard project appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Trump Says U.S. May Buy Beef from Argentina

“We would buy some beef from Argentina,” Trump said during the flight from Florida to Washington. “If we do that, that will bring our beef prices down.” The president did not specify when the purchases might begin or how much beef would be imported but emphasized the move could help ease pressure on American households.

The comment follows Trump’s recent pledge to address rising food costs, which have been a major driver of inflation and a point of concern among voters. Economists say U.S. beef prices have remained high due to a combination of factors, including drought conditions, high feed costs, and reduced imports from Mexico caused by an outbreak of a flesh-eating pest in cattle herds.

Beef Prices and Inflation Pressure

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), retail beef prices have climbed steadily over the past year, with consumers paying significantly more for ground beef, steaks, and roasts compared to pre-pandemic levels. The combination of declining cattle herds and global supply chain disruptions has limited market supply.

Agricultural analysts note that importing beef from Argentina, one of the world’s largest beef producers, could temporarily ease domestic supply constraints. However, some U.S. ranchers may resist the plan, citing concerns about competition, quality standards, and potential risks of introducing foreign animal diseases.

U.S.–Argentina Economic Ties Strengthened

Trump’s statement also comes as Washington deepens its financial ties with Buenos Aires. His administration has backed a $20 billion credit swap line to help stabilize Argentina’s struggling currency, the peso, amid record inflation and capital flight. The deal includes additional financing from private-sector investors and sovereign funds.

Argentina’s President Javier Milei, a close Trump ally, has pursued aggressive market reforms aimed at curbing inflation and restoring investor confidence. Milei’s government has welcomed increased trade and financial cooperation with the United States as part of its strategy to revive Argentina’s economy.

Strategic and Political Implications

For the Trump administration, expanding trade with Argentina offers both economic and diplomatic advantages. It reinforces U.S. influence in South America while providing a practical tool to address rising food costs at home. Political analysts suggest that the move could resonate with working-class voters sensitive to inflation and grocery prices.

However, critics argue that the plan could face logistical and regulatory hurdles, including compliance with USDA import standards and domestic industry pushback. “It’s a politically bold but technically complex idea,” said one former U.S. trade official. “Any imports would need to meet strict health and safety requirements before entering the American market.”

Global Agricultural Context

Argentina ranks among the top five global beef exporters, shipping large volumes to China, the European Union, and the Middle East. Its grass-fed beef is prized for quality and competitive pricing, factors that could appeal to U.S. processors seeking cost relief. The proposed imports would also signal a shift in U.S. trade priorities, reflecting growing cooperation with Latin American economies amid a changing global food landscape.

Economic Outlook

Economists say the potential impact on U.S. inflation would depend on the scale and duration of the imports. “It might provide short-term relief, but it won’t solve structural issues in the beef supply chain,” said Dr. Laura McKinney, an agricultural economist at the University of Minnesota. “Long-term solutions require investment in domestic production resilience.”

Despite uncertainties, Trump’s remarks highlight a renewed focus on food affordability as a key political and economic challenge. With inflation still hovering above the Federal Reserve’s target range, the administration’s decision could signal broader trade adjustments aimed at stabilizing prices across essential commodities.

Source: AP News – Trump suggests US will buy Argentinian beef to bring down prices for American consumers

The post Trump Suggests Importing Argentinian Beef to Ease U.S. Prices appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Egg prices have skyrocketed, and with no relief in sight, consumers can expect to pay even more in the coming months, especially as Easter approaches and demand surges.

As of December, the average price for a dozen eggs reached $4.15 nationwide. While this is slightly lower than the record-high price of $4.82 set in 2022, experts predict that prices will rise another 20% this year. For some shoppers, the situation is even worse: prices are already more than double the national average, and many grocery stores are facing empty shelves. Organic and cage-free eggs are particularly expensive, and some stores have even implemented purchase limits.

A Staple Food Becoming a Luxury

Minneapolis resident Sage Mills shared her frustration: “It’s just robbery. Eggs used to be a staple food for us, but now you might as well just go out to eat.”

But what’s behind the surge in prices?

The Bird Flu Crisis

The ongoing bird flu outbreak that began in 2022 is the primary culprit behind the soaring egg prices. The flu spreads rapidly, and when detected on a poultry farm, the entire flock is slaughtered to prevent further contamination. With some massive egg farms housing over a million chickens, even a few cases of bird flu can lead to a severe supply shortage.

The process of dealing with outbreaks—disposing of infected birds, disinfecting barns, and bringing in new flocks—can take months. Since the outbreak began, over 145 million chickens, turkeys, and other birds have been slaughtered, most of them egg-laying hens.

In addition, the passage of cage-free egg laws in 10 states has disrupted supply chains further. These laws mandate that chickens have a minimum amount of space or be cage-free. In states like California, Massachusetts, and Michigan, the transition to cage-free eggs has pushed prices even higher. For example, at a Target in Chicago, a dozen conventional eggs was priced at $4.49, while cage-free eggs were selling for $6.19.

Why Is the Virus So Difficult to Control?

Bird flu is primarily spread by wild birds, such as ducks and geese, which carry the virus without getting sick. This allows the virus to mutate and thrive as wild birds migrate. The flu spreads easily through bird droppings or any interaction between farm-raised poultry and wild birds. It can even be brought into farms on workers’ boots or vehicles.

Unlike previous outbreaks, this one hasn’t been quelled by summer heat, as the virus found a new host in dairy cattle last March. While cattle don’t die from bird flu, their sicknesses provide more opportunities for the virus to spread. Additionally, more than 60 people have contracted bird flu since last March, with one death, though no evidence suggests it spreads from person to person.

Efforts to Combat the Virus

Farmers are taking extensive precautions to protect their flocks. Many have installed truck washes to disinfect vehicles entering the farm and require workers to shower and change clothes before entering poultry barns. Some farms even use lasers to keep wild birds away.

Additionally, dairy farmers are isolating sick cattle and performing extra testing to prevent further outbreaks. Despite these efforts, vaccination for poultry remains impractical, as it would require vaccinating millions of chickens, and many countries may refuse to buy meat from vaccinated birds.

While no bird flu-infected animals are allowed in the food supply, experts assure the public that cooking meat to 165°F (74°C) kills the virus, and pasteurization kills it in milk.

The Financial Toll

The financial toll of the bird flu outbreak has been staggering. While it’s hard to estimate how much individual farmers have spent on biosecurity measures—like sealing barns and building shower houses—the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has spent over $1.14 billion compensating farmers for lost birds. The USDA also allocated more than $576 million for its own response efforts.

The bird flu has also affected the prices of turkey, chicken, and milk, leading to further pressure on grocery bills.

At a Minneapolis supermarket, manager Mike Vickers expressed the difficulty in managing egg prices: “It’s the first time in my life that I’ve ever had to be kind of embarrassed about what I’m selling eggs for.” Despite paying $7.45 per dozen, the store is only making 14 cents on each dozen sold.

The Bottom Line

Egg prices are not likely to return to normal anytime soon. The ongoing bird flu outbreak, coupled with state laws on cage-free eggs, continues to put pressure on the supply chain. With no immediate end in sight to the crisis, shoppers will likely face higher prices, limited availability, and frustration at the grocery store for the foreseeable future.

Source

The post Egg Shortages and Price Hikes: What’s Causing the Surge? appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.