Sources told Reuters that Moscow passed the paper — described in diplomatic terminology as a “non-paper” — to senior U.S. officials shortly after a meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Washington in mid-October. While non-papers are often exchanged informally during negotiations to outline positions without formal attribution, this one echoed longstanding Russian conditions Ukraine has repeatedly rejected, including surrendering significant eastern territory.

The U.S. State Department and the Russian and Ukrainian embassies in Washington did not comment. The White House declined to address the document directly but referenced Trump’s recent remarks expressing optimism about progress on the peace initiative.

Russian Input Confirmed in U.S. Proposal

This marks the first confirmation that the Russian non-paper was used as a meaningful reference point for the U.S. proposal. The document contained language and concessions Russia has raised at previous negotiation attempts, including at talks in 2022 that stalled within weeks of Russia’s full-scale invasion. Ukraine has consistently ruled out territorial concessions, with President Zelenskiy stating that sovereignty and internationally recognized borders remain non-negotiable.

In a written statement, Trump said he had directed his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow while Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll held parallel talks with Ukrainian officials. The sequencing of those meetings, and the limited visibility among senior U.S. agencies, left several officials questioning how the Russian non-paper became intertwined with elements of the American plan.

Some U.S. officials who reviewed the document, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, believed the Russian terms would be rejected immediately by Kyiv, according to two sources. Rubio later acknowledged receiving “numerous written non-papers,” though he declined to elaborate.

Growing Skepticism in Washington and Europe

Since the plan first emerged in media reports last week, skepticism has intensified across U.S. government agencies and among lawmakers. Critics argue the proposal closely mirrors Russian positions rather than reflecting a balanced diplomatic effort.

Despite concerns, the United States has pressed Kyiv to engage with the framework and warned that military assistance could be reconsidered if Ukraine refused to participate, according to the sources. U.S. military support for Ukraine has totaled more than $70 billion since the invasion, according to publicly available data, making continued assistance central to Ukraine’s ability to sustain its defense.

The plan was drafted in part during a meeting in Miami last month involving Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, special envoy Witkoff and Kirill Dmitriev, who heads one of Russia’s sovereign wealth funds. Two people familiar with the matter said few officials inside the State Department or White House were informed about the discussions.

On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that Witkoff had offered communication advice to senior Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov regarding how Putin should speak to Trump. Call transcripts reviewed by the news agency referred to a potential “20-point plan” as early as October 14, which later expanded through subsequent exchanges involving Dmitriev.

Plan Scaled Back After Diplomatic Backlash

The U.S. proposal surprised officials in Washington and European capitals, triggering urgent consultations across three continents. According to ABC News, nine of the original 28 points have been removed following discussions between senior U.S. and Ukrainian officials.

A bipartisan group of U.S. senators said over the weekend that Rubio had described the proposal as a Russian “wish list,” a characterization the White House and State Department strongly denied. The contradiction fueled questions about how widely the plan was vetted inside the administration.

Diplomats familiar with the talks said a U.S. delegation, including Rubio, met European and Ukrainian counterparts in Geneva and agreed to remove or revise sections viewed as overly favorable to Moscow. Driscoll is currently holding discussions with a Russian delegation in Abu Dhabi, while Ukrainian officials have traveled to the United Arab Emirates for parallel meetings, a U.S. official confirmed.

Ukrainian officials said on Tuesday they supported the modified framework emerging from the latest round of talks but emphasized that the most sensitive points — especially territorial issues — could only be resolved in a direct meeting between Zelenskiy and Trump.

Unanswered Questions Over Influence and Process

It remains unclear why the Trump administration relied on a Russian-authored proposal to help shape its initial peace outline. Analysts note that non-papers can serve as informal diplomatic tools, but their use typically comes with broad interagency review. In this case, sources said only a small circle of advisers had access to the document before its content influenced the draft proposal.

European officials, who have backed Ukraine’s calls for a peace process based on the United Nations Charter, expressed concern that the U.S. plan appeared to diverge from internationally recognized conditions, including the withdrawal of Russian troops and restoration of territorial integrity. Several NATO governments were not given advance notice before the framework circulated.

Russia has repeatedly said it is open to negotiations but insists that Kyiv must accept the “new realities on the ground” — language referring to territory Russia claims to have annexed, moves not recognized by the United Nations.

Next Steps and Diplomatic Outlook

The updated U.S. plan remains under discussion, with further revisions expected. Zelenskiy has maintained that Ukraine will only support a peace agreement that ensures security guarantees, full sovereignty and accountability for wartime actions. Kyiv continues to advance its own 10-point peace formula, which includes nuclear safety, food security, prisoner exchanges and the withdrawal of Russian forces.

Talks are set to continue in the coming weeks, though no timeline has been announced for a potential meeting between Zelenskiy and Trump. Western diplomats caution that even a revised framework faces significant obstacles, given the scale of territorial disputes and the lack of direct negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow since 2022.

The war in Ukraine has entered its third year with front lines largely static but casualties continuing to mount. The United Nations estimates that millions have been displaced, and the conflict has had far-reaching effects on global food and energy markets.

For now, officials say the modified framework represents an ongoing attempt to keep diplomatic channels open — but with no guarantee of producing a breakthrough.

Source: Reuters – Exclusive: US peace plan for Ukraine drew from Russian document, sources say

The post U.S. Peace Plan for Ukraine Drew on Russian Proposal, Sources Say appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

President Donald Trump described the peace initiative as a “concept” still undergoing adjustments and indicated he may hold direct talks with Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy if negotiations progress. The proposal has prompted urgent international engagement, with allies seeking clarity over security guarantees, territorial implications, and Europe’s role in shaping any agreement.

Trump Says Plan Still Under Revision Amid Diplomatic Push

Speaking aboard Air Force One late Tuesday, Trump confirmed that envoy Steve Witkoff will travel to Moscow next week for high-level discussions with Putin. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, meanwhile, has been tasked with engaging Ukrainian officials following two days of talks with Russian counterparts in Abu Dhabi.

Trump said the negotiations remain challenging and rejected claims that his original 28-point framework was final. “That was not a plan — it was a concept,” he told reporters, adding that revisions were underway. The White House has not released the updated version publicly.

Trump suggested his son-in-law Jared Kushner could participate in upcoming meetings, saying momentum was building and that “people are starting to realize it’s a good deal for both parties.” The prospect of Kushner joining the process has drawn mixed responses in Washington, particularly from lawmakers wary of sidelining established diplomatic channels.

European officials reacted swiftly last week after the plan emerged, fearing the contours heavily favored Moscow and could reshape regional security without their input. Leaders across NATO capitals have held emergency consultations in recent days as they seek assurances that their interests will be incorporated.

Territorial Concessions at Center of Controversy

A key point in Trump’s proposal calls for Ukraine to relinquish the eastern Donbas region to Russia, despite Kyiv retaining control over large areas of the territory. Trump minimized concerns over territorial loss, arguing Russian forces were already advancing.

“The way it’s going, if you look, it’s just moving in one direction,” he said, suggesting Russia might seize the land in the coming months regardless of negotiations. Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War dispute that timeline, estimating it would take several years for Russia to occupy the entire region at its current rate of movement.

Zelenskyy has been engaging directly with U.S. negotiators since the plan surfaced, pressing for stronger guarantees and protections. His government has consistently rejected any settlement requiring territorial concessions and maintains that Ukrainian sovereignty must remain intact under international law.

Transcript Controversy Sparks Political Backlash

Tensions intensified after Bloomberg News released details of an October call between Witkoff and Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov. The transcript reportedly showed Witkoff coaching Moscow on how Putin should approach a conversation with Trump, prompting sharp criticism on Capitol Hill.

Trump dismissed the reported exchange as “a very standard form of negotiation.” But Republican Representative Don Bacon, a frequent critic of Trump’s Ukraine stance, said Witkoff appeared to be favoring Russia and called for his removal. The Associated Press has not independently verified the recording.

Lt. Col. Jeff Tolbert, spokesperson for Driscoll, said discussions in Abu Dhabi were “going well” and that U.S. officials remained optimistic. Witkoff, a former real estate executive turned envoy, has emerged as Trump’s primary channel to Putin during this peace effort.

New Phase of Talks Involves U.S., Europe, and Ukraine

French President Emmanuel Macron said Tuesday that diplomatic efforts were “at a crucial juncture,” following separate meetings involving U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Ukrainian representatives in Geneva. A virtual session of European allies — described as a “coalition of the willing” — also took place, led by France and the United Kingdom.

Macron urged participants to “seize this momentum,” while British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the emerging text appeared broadly acceptable to Kyiv, though discussions were far from complete. Ukrainian delegate Oleksandr Bevz cautioned that it was “very premature” to suggest agreement had been reached.

Bevz confirmed that the number of points in the draft had been reduced but denied reports that the list now contained only 19 items. He said revisions removed duplicates and sections addressing U.S.–Russia matters unrelated to Ukraine. Security guarantees for Kyiv, he added, would determine whether any deal was durable and enforceable.

Zelenskyy said Monday that progress was possible and that he planned to raise remaining “sensitive” issues directly with Trump. His adviser Rustem Umerov posted that Kyiv hopes to finalize a settlement at the earliest suitable date in November, though no timeline has been confirmed by Washington or Moscow.

Escalation on the Ground Underscores Fragile Outlook

As negotiations continued, Russia launched a large overnight barrage targeting Kyiv, killing at least seven people and striking residential areas and energy infrastructure. The attacks knocked out water, electricity, and heat in parts of the capital as winter approaches.

Mayor Vitalii Klitschko said 20 people were wounded, and images showed flames engulfing a nine-story apartment building in the Dniprovskyi district. Russia said it was responding to Ukrainian strikes on civilian targets in Russia, which Kyiv denies. A Ukrainian attack on southern Russia killed three people and damaged homes, authorities reported.

Liubov Petrivna, a 90-year-old resident whose apartment was shattered, told the Associated Press that “glass rained down” during the strike and voiced disbelief that peace talks would succeed. “No one will ever do anything about it,” she said, adding that Putin “won’t stop until he finishes us off.”

In Russia’s Krasnodar region, what officials described as one of Ukraine’s largest drone assaults wounded six people and targeted industrial sites, including an aviation repair plant and oil facilities. Russia said it intercepted 249 Ukrainian drones across multiple regions and Crimea, marking one of the most extensive attacks since the war began in February 2022.

Long Road Ahead Despite Diplomatic Activity

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Moscow was in contact with U.S. officials and expected Washington to provide a revised draft after consultations with European and Ukrainian partners. He declined to comment on specific terms or timelines.

European leaders have repeatedly warned that any settlement will require sustained monitoring and credible enforcement to prevent future escalation. While recent talks reflect new engagement, diplomats across the region caution that the path to peace remains uncertain and potentially lengthy.

For now, the Trump administration appears determined to accelerate negotiations despite political pressure at home and ongoing hostilities on the ground. Whether the current momentum translates into a lasting agreement — or simply another phase in a protracted conflict — remains unclear.

Source: AP News – Trump says he’s sending his envoys to see Putin and Ukrainians after fine-tuning plan to end war

The post Trump Sends Envoys to Moscow and Kyiv as Peace Efforts Enter Critical Stage appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: October 13, 2025, 21:45 EDT

The long-awaited transfer of Israeli hostages from Gaza has begun, marking a critical moment in the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) confirmed that its teams had received the first group of hostages in Gaza before facilitating their transport to Israeli custody.

According to officials involved in the operation, the initial handover took place in northern Gaza, where the hostages were transferred to Red Cross vehicles for medical and security checks before being moved to Israeli-controlled areas.

Red Cross Confirms Hostage Transfer Operations Underway

The ICRC said its teams reached the first collection point in Gaza early Monday to oversee the safe transfer of hostages as part of the humanitarian arrangement.
“The ICRC will not release footage of the hostages or detainees out of respect for their dignity and safety,” the organization said in a statement.

Israeli media outlets, including Haaretz and Channel 12, reported that the first seven hostages were handed over to Red Cross officials. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed preparations were in place to receive the returnees at southern Israel’s Re’im military base, where they would undergo medical evaluation before reuniting with their families.

Families Await Reunions as First Names Confirmed

Among those confirmed for release is Guy Gilboa-Dalal, whose father told Haaretz that his son was now in Red Cross custody and would be handed to Israeli forces “within minutes.”

“This is a dream come true,” said Ilan Dalal. “We are euphoric, very excited, and dying to hug him.”

In Tel Aviv’s Hostages Square, hundreds of relatives and supporters gathered to follow the developments in real time. Many carried Israeli and U.S. flags, while large digital screens broadcast live updates from Gaza. “Today all Israelis are together—it’s not about left or right,” said 17-year-old Yarden, who joined the early morning vigil.

Exchange Terms: 20 Hostages for Over 1,700 Palestinian Detainees

Under the terms of the ceasefire agreement, 20 Israeli hostages believed to be alive are being freed in exchange for 1,718 Palestinian prisoners and detainees from Gaza and the West Bank.

According to the Hamas-run Prisoners Media Office, the list of Palestinian detainees includes women, minors, and prisoners affiliated with Hamas who were not serving life sentences. Israeli media reported that several adjustments were made overnight to the final list, including replacing minors with adult detainees.

In return, the released hostages will undergo medical care and psychological assessment before being reunited with their families. Israeli emergency services, including Magen David Adom, said paramedics and trauma units were on standby across key military and hospital locations.

Emotional Scenes in Tel Aviv and Southern Israel

In Re’im base, relatives of hostages gathered from early morning, waiting anxiously for the first military convoys. “It’s very emotional and moving,” said Rotem Cooper, whose father was killed in captivity while his mother was freed weeks earlier.

Elsewhere in Tel Aviv, billboards displayed messages reading “Thank You President Trump” and “Peace Upon Israel.” Observers say the deal represents a diplomatic milestone, facilitated by Washington and regional partners including Egypt and Qatar.

Trump Hails ‘End of the War’ Ahead of Middle East Summit

U.S. President Donald Trump declared “the war is over” as he prepared to address Israel’s Knesset before heading to Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, where a peace summit will convene later this week.

At least 20 world leaders, including U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, are expected to attend. Starmer’s office confirmed plans to announce a £20 million humanitarian aid package for Gaza during the summit.

The U.S. administration described the hostages’ release as a “humanitarian breakthrough” that underscores Washington’s renewed influence in brokering Middle East stability.

UN Confirms Surge in Humanitarian Aid to Gaza

The United Nations reported a “promised surge” of food and medical supplies reaching Gaza in the past 24 hours. Humanitarian convoys have distributed hundreds of thousands of hot meals and loaves of bread in coordination with local NGOs.

Despite the ceasefire, sporadic violence has been reported as Hamas police patrol areas of Gaza to contain unrest and clashes with armed groups. Israeli officials said an international task force will begin work to locate and identify the remains of deceased hostages not yet returned within the 72-hour deadline.

Reunion Kits Prepared for Released Hostages

A symbolic gesture from Israeli leaders will accompany the homecoming: each freed hostage will receive a personal kit that includes clothing, a mobile phone, a tablet, and a handwritten note from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Sara Netanyahu.

“On behalf of the entire people of Israel, welcome back,” the letter reads. “We have been waiting for you, we embrace you.”

The government said the note represents the country’s collective gratitude and resilience after nearly two years of captivity for many of those released.

Ongoing Verification and Security Coordination

The IDF said air force helicopters remain on standby to transport hostages requiring urgent care to hospitals across Israel. Officials emphasized that the timing and route of each transfer remain subject to change for security reasons.

While international monitors welcomed the exchange, analysts noted that sustainable peace will depend on continued diplomatic engagement beyond the immediate humanitarian relief.

“This moment brings immense relief, but the region still faces deep political challenges,” said Tamar Ben-Ami, a regional analyst at the Jerusalem Institute for Security Studies. “The success of this exchange will be measured not just by who comes home, but by whether it leads to lasting calm.”

This report includes verified information from Reuters, AP News, Haaretz, ICRC, United Nations, and official Israeli government statements as of October 13, 2025.

Source: BBC Live Update –Handover of Israeli hostages begins in Gaza

The post Israeli Hostages Handed to Red Cross as Gaza Exchange Process Begins appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: October 13, 2025, 21:45 EDT

Anticipation has grown across Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank as a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas holds ahead of a critical day of hostages, prisoners, and humanitarian releases. The developments come as U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to visit Israel and Egypt, marking a high-stakes diplomatic moment for the region.

Hostage Release Expected Monday

Israel said Sunday that it expects the release of 20 living hostages held in Gaza since the October 7, 2023 attacks, when Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 Israelis and abducted about 250 people. The hostages will be handed over to the International Committee of the Red Cross before being transferred to the Israeli military’s Reim base for medical evaluation and family reunions.

Officials have prepared ambulances in case urgent medical care is required following more than two years of captivity. The remains of up to 28 other hostages are not expected to be returned at the same time, although Israel stated that “an international body” will assist in locating and recovering them if not released within 72 hours, as stipulated in the ceasefire terms.

Palestinian Prisoners Set for Mass Release

As part of the truce deal, Israel is set to release approximately 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, including 1,700 detainees captured during the war and held without formal charges. Another 250 prisoners serving sentences will also be freed.

The group includes members of Hamas and Fatah involved in violent attacks against Israelis, as well as individuals convicted of lesser offenses. Many will return to Gaza or the West Bank, while some could face exile depending on the final terms of the exchange.

It remains unclear which prisoners will be allowed to return directly to Gaza or whether certain individuals will be deported under international supervision.

Humanitarian Aid Surge Planned for Gaza

International aid agencies said they are preparing to significantly increase humanitarian deliveries to Gaza as part of the ceasefire framework. On Sunday, around 400 trucks carrying food and supplies from Egypt awaited Israeli inspection before entering the enclave.

Israel’s defense body overseeing aid operations confirmed that the number will soon rise to 600 trucks per day. The goal is to alleviate severe shortages and widespread hunger in the territory, where famine conditions have been documented by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC).

The IPC reported in August that Gaza City was already experiencing famine, with the crisis projected to spread south toward Deir al-Balah and Khan Younis if restrictions were not eased. Rebuilding efforts remain daunting, with much of Gaza reduced to rubble and more than two million residents displaced.

Trump’s Visit and Regional Diplomacy

President Trump, who played a key role in securing the ceasefire, is scheduled to arrive in Israel on Monday morning. His visit will include meetings with families of hostages and an address to the Knesset, Israel’s parliament.

A large U.S. flag draped Jerusalem’s City Hall complex on Sunday night, while American and Israeli flags were projected onto the walls of the Old City. After his meetings in Israel, Trump will travel to Egypt to attend a regional “peace summit” alongside Middle Eastern and international leaders. He is expected to return to Washington by early Tuesday.

Ceasefire Faces Unresolved Challenges

Despite optimism over the ceasefire and upcoming releases, several key disputes remain unresolved. Israel insists that Hamas must disarm completely, while Hamas demands a full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza.

The question of Gaza’s long-term governance also looms large. Hamas has controlled the enclave for nearly two decades, and discussions continue about potential transitional administration models involving Palestinian and international authorities.

Gaza’s Health Ministry, which operates under Hamas, reports that over 67,600 Palestinians have been killed since the war began, about half of them women and children. While Israel disputes these figures, the United Nations and independent analysts regard the ministry’s statistics as the most comprehensive available estimate of casualties to date.

Path Ahead: Fragile Hope Amid Deep Division

The coming days are expected to test whether the ceasefire can evolve into a sustainable peace process or collapse under mutual mistrust. For now, families across both sides — waiting for hostages, prisoners, and news of their loved ones — are clinging to cautious hope that this fragile moment of calm might endure.

Source: AP News – What to know as Israel and Gaza await the release of hostages, prisoners, aid — and Trump’s visit

The post Israel, Gaza Brace for Hostage and Prisoner Releases as Ceasefire Holds Ahead of Trump Visit appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: September 22, 2025, 14:00 EDT

As the war in Gaza intensifies, France and Saudi Arabia are seeking to revive international momentum toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Their proposal has gained support from several Western nations, but faces significant opposition from Israel, the United States, and domestic political divisions across the region.

Renewed Calls for Palestinian Statehood

France and Saudi Arabia are using the United Nations General Assembly as a platform to push forward a phased plan for Palestinian statehood. The proposal envisions the creation of a demilitarized Palestinian state in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem, areas Israel captured during the 1967 Middle East war.

Britain, Canada, and Australia formally recognized a Palestinian state earlier this month, joining nearly 150 nations that have already extended recognition. France is expected to make a similar move during the ongoing UN gathering.

Despite growing international backing, both Israel and the United States remain firmly opposed. Washington has blocked Palestinian representatives from participating in General Assembly proceedings, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened unilateral measures, including potential annexation of parts of the West Bank.

Historical Context and Ongoing Challenges

The two-state framework has long been viewed as the most viable pathway to ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which has spanned more than a century. Supporters argue that it would allow Israel to preserve its identity as a Jewish and democratic state while granting Palestinians sovereignty and rights.

Critics of the status quo note that Palestinians live under varying degrees of Israeli control, with limited autonomy in parts of the West Bank and severe restrictions in Gaza. Major rights groups have warned that the current system amounts to apartheid.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized the urgency of the issue, stating, “Without a two-state solution, there will be no peace in the Middle East.”

However, efforts to negotiate peace have repeatedly faltered. Talks that began in the early 1990s collapsed amid cycles of violence and the expansion of Israeli settlements, which now house over 500,000 Israeli citizens in the West Bank alongside three million Palestinians. No substantial negotiations have occurred since Netanyahu returned to power in 2009.

Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza

The Gaza Strip remains at the center of the crisis. Following Hamas’ October 7, 2023, attack, Israel launched a military campaign that has devastated the territory. Reports indicate tens of thousands of Palestinian deaths, displacement of nearly 90% of the population, and widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure.

The United Nations has warned of famine in certain areas, while aid groups describe conditions as “uninhabitable.” Israel’s latest offensive threatens to further dismantle Gaza’s largest urban centers.

Netanyahu’s government, already opposed to Palestinian statehood prior to the war, has doubled down on its stance. Meanwhile, critics accuse U.S. policymakers of deprioritizing peace talks in favor of policies that could lead to population displacement.

The French-Saudi Proposal

France and Saudi Arabia’s plan seeks to de-escalate the conflict through a phased approach:

• An immediate ceasefire in Gaza.

• Release of hostages held by Hamas.

• Full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.

• Transfer of authority to a politically independent body under the Palestinian Authority.

Hamas would be required to disarm, though the group has not agreed to this condition. The international community, with potential support from peacekeepers, would oversee Gaza’s reconstruction and governance.

The proposal also envisions broader regional integration, including the possibility of Saudi Arabia normalizing ties with Israel, an outcome that could reshape Middle East diplomacy.

Earlier this month, the UN General Assembly approved a nonbinding resolution endorsing the “New York Declaration,” lending symbolic weight to the initiative.

U.S. and Israeli Opposition

The United States and Israel argue that advancing Palestinian statehood under current conditions risks emboldening Hamas and undermining hostage negotiations. Ceasefire talks collapsed in September after an Israeli strike on Hamas negotiators in Qatar, and earlier attempts had already failed in March and July.

Israeli officials contend that a Palestinian state could provide Hamas with a base for future large-scale attacks. Netanyahu has described international recognition of Palestinian statehood as an attack on Israel itself, warning that unilateral moves by other nations will be met with unilateral responses.

Washington has avoided explicitly endorsing annexation but continues to oppose premature recognition of Palestinian sovereignty. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio linked discussions on annexation to the broader statehood debate during recent interviews.

The United Arab Emirates, which normalized relations with Israel through the 2020 Abraham Accords, has warned that annexation would be a “red line,” though it has not outlined potential consequences.

Unresolved Core Issues

The French-Saudi plan avoids addressing some of the most divisive elements of the conflict:

• Final borders of a Palestinian state.

• Fate of Israeli settlements in occupied territories.

• Right of return for Palestinian refugees.

• Security guarantees for both sides.

• Status of Jerusalem.

Another obstacle lies in the Palestinian Authority itself. President Mahmoud Abbas, widely criticized for corruption and lack of accountability, has repeatedly postponed elections. Hamas, which won the last national election in 2006, would be excluded unless it disarms and recognizes Israel.

This has led many observers to question whether the proposed framework can deliver lasting peace. Without broad Palestinian support, analysts warn the plan risks becoming another failed roadmap in a long history of stalled negotiations.

Outlook for the Future

Despite renewed diplomatic momentum, the path to a two-state solution remains fraught with challenges. Israel’s political leadership continues to reject Palestinian statehood, the United States has withheld strong support, and Palestinian factions remain divided.

As the conflict in Gaza rages on, the humanitarian toll underscores the urgency of finding a resolution. Whether the French-Saudi plan can bridge decades of mistrust and political deadlock remains uncertain, but it has reignited global debate over one of the world’s most enduring conflicts.

Source: AP News – How the growing push for a 2-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could backfire

The post Push for Two-State Solution Faces Rising Resistance in Middle East Peace Talks appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published Time: 08-18-2025, 12:00

European and NATO leaders will accompany Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Washington for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump, aiming to secure military support and stronger security guarantees. This coordinated approach follows Zelenskyy’s exclusion from Trump’s recent summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and seeks to reinforce Kyiv’s position.

European Leaders Rally Behind Zelenskyy

Leaders from Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Finland confirmed Sunday that they will join Zelenskyy at the White House on Monday. Their presence aims to provide diplomatic support and prevent a repeat of February’s tense Oval Office meeting, in which Trump sharply criticized the Ukrainian president.

Retired French General Dominique Trinquand, former head of France’s military mission at the United Nations, said, “The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelenskyy to the hilt. It’s a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump.”

Security Guarantees and Peace Efforts

During his Alaska summit with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin reportedly agreed that the U.S. and its European allies could offer Ukraine security guarantees similar to NATO’s collective defense pledge. Special U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff called this development “game-changing,” noting it was the first time Russia indicated openness to such guarantees.

French President Emmanuel Macron emphasized that European leaders will ask Trump to support plans to strengthen Ukraine’s armed forces, already the largest in Europe outside Russia, through training, equipment, and long-term funding. “We need a credible format for the Ukrainian army,” Macron said. “We Europeans and Americans must decide how we’ll train, equip, and finance this effort.”

The European plan also envisions allied forces stationed away from the front lines, providing reassurance that peace can be maintained and deterring another potential Russian invasion. Macron highlighted that “several thousand men on the ground in Ukraine in the zone of peace” would demonstrate that “our fates are linked.”

Coordination Among International Partners

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reinforced Macron’s message, stating, “We welcome President Trump’s willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. The coalition of the willing—including the European Union—is ready to do its share.”

Other European leaders confirmed their participation, including British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Their collective support aims to reassure Kyiv that Ukraine will not be pressured into premature agreements.

Neil Melvin, director of international security at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said European leaders are working to “shape this fast-evolving agenda” after the Alaska summit, where the focus has shifted from ceasefire discussions toward long-term security arrangements and preventing Ukraine from joining NATO or the EU under duress.

Ceasefire or Full Peace Deal?

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said a ceasefire remains “not off the table,” but a comprehensive peace deal is considered the best path forward. Putin has resisted meeting Zelenskyy in person, insisting that groundwork for a peace deal must be established first. He also suggested that European nations could inadvertently create obstacles through “behind-the-scenes intrigue.”

For Zelenskyy, European participation is essential to gain entry into high-level discussions about Ukraine’s future and broader European security, according to Melvin. However, with so many leaders attending, the group must avoid sending mixed messages. “The risk is they look heavy-handed and are ganging up on Trump,” Melvin added.

Substantive Security Commitments

While discussions on Article 5-like guarantees remain in early stages, such guarantees would likely mirror NATO terms, where an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. Zelenskyy has stressed that meaningful security commitments require a strong Ukrainian military, European funding, and access to U.S.-provided weapons.

“A security guarantee is a strong army. Only Ukraine can provide that. Only Europe can finance this army, and weapons for this army can be provided by our domestic production and European production. Some items are only available in the United States,” Zelenskyy said at a press conference alongside von der Leyen.

Zelenskyy also countered Trump’s proposal—aligned with Putin’s preference—to negotiate a full end to the war immediately. Instead, he argued that a ceasefire is necessary to review Russia’s demands and create conditions for meaningful negotiations. “It’s impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons,” he said. “Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it.”

Next Steps

Monday’s talks in Washington will be a critical test of coordination between Ukraine, European powers, and the United States. Leaders aim to outline concrete plans for military support, long-term security guarantees, and strategies to deter further Russian aggression. The meeting also seeks to ensure Ukraine’s voice is central in shaping peace agreements and regional security.

Source: AP News – European leaders to join Ukraine’s Zelenskyy for meeting with Trump

The post European Leaders Join Zelenskyy in Washington Talks with Trump on Ukraine Security appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: August 17, 2025 | 14:30

The Trump administration is pressing to end the United Nations peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, a move that has drawn sharp opposition from key European allies. The dispute has reopened long-standing transatlantic tensions, particularly with France, Britain, and Italy, and raised concerns about stability in southern Lebanon and the wider Middle East.

Why UNIFIL Matters

The U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was first deployed in 1978 after Israel’s invasion of southern Lebanon. Its role expanded in 2006 following the war between Israel and Hezbollah. Today, about 10,000 peacekeepers patrol the southern border alongside roughly 6,000 Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) soldiers.

UNIFIL’s mandate is set to expire at the end of August, pending renewal by the U.N. Security Council. Supporters view the mission as a stabilizing force, but the Trump administration argues it is ineffective, costly, and unable to curb Hezbollah’s growing military presence.

Washington Pushes for a Phase-Out

U.S. officials say the administration is pushing to wind down UNIFIL within six months. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently approved a plan to cut American financial contributions and reduce the mission’s size.

Officials describe UNIFIL as “a waste of resources” that delays efforts to empower Lebanon’s army to secure the border on its own. The plan reflects the administration’s broader strategy of reducing U.S. spending on international missions and challenging the role of multilateral institutions.

European Allies Push Back

France and Italy, two of UNIFIL’s largest troop contributors, strongly oppose a rapid withdrawal. Diplomats warn that ending the mission too quickly could create a power vacuum, which Hezbollah would likely exploit.

A senior French official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Lebanon’s army is still too weak to manage the border alone. France also cited the U.N. withdrawal from Mali as a cautionary example, where Islamist militants gained ground after peacekeepers left.

France has proposed a one-year extension of UNIFIL’s mandate without a fixed withdrawal deadline. U.S. officials, however, want a clear timetable, setting the stage for tough negotiations at the Security Council.

Israel’s Divided View

Israel has long criticized UNIFIL for failing to stop Hezbollah’s weapons buildup. In recent years, Israeli forces discovered cross-border tunnels and hidden weapons near UNIFIL patrol areas.

“UNIFIL has been damaging with regard to disarming Hezbollah,” said Sarit Zehavi, a former Israeli military intelligence analyst. Still, Israel has reluctantly supported a temporary extension, fearing greater instability if the mission ends abruptly.

Lebanon Urges Continued Support

Lebanon has called on the international community to maintain the mission. Officials argue their army is overstretched and cannot fully secure the border without U.N. backing.

“UNIFIL may not fulfill 100% of what Western powers or Israel expect. But for Lebanon, their presence is important,” said retired Lebanese Army Gen. Khalil Helou.

The United Nations also supports the mission. Spokesman Stephane Dujarric confirmed that peacekeepers continue to uncover unauthorized weapons, such as rocket launchers and mortar rounds, which are reported to the Lebanese army.

Searching for Compromise

Diplomats are exploring a middle ground, such as reducing the size of the force while upgrading its surveillance technology to monitor southern Lebanon more efficiently. This approach could cut costs while maintaining oversight in a tense border region.

“UNIFIL exists to help both parties implement its mandate, and the final decision lies with the Security Council,” said UNIFIL spokesperson Andrea Tenenti.

A Transatlantic Divide

As the August deadline approaches, the dispute highlights broader differences between Washington and its European allies. While the U.S. pushes for scaling back international peacekeeping, Europe remains committed to U.N. missions as essential stabilizing tools in fragile regions.

Source: AP News – The Trump administration wants to end the UN peacekeeping in Lebanon. Europe is pushing back

The post U.S. Push to End UN Peacekeeping in Lebanon Faces Strong European Resistance appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A surprise ceasefire deal between Israel and Syria is raising hopes for peace after days of deadly violence. The announcement came Friday from Tom Barrack, the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, who said both sides have agreed to stop fighting — and that neighboring countries are supporting the move.

Ceasefire After Airstrikes and Rising Tensions

The ceasefire follows Israeli airstrikes on Syria earlier this week. Israel said the attacks were to protect the Druze minority — an Arab religious group — after violent clashes broke out in southern Syria.

Fighting between Syrian government forces, Druze militias, and Bedouin tribes in the Suwayda region has killed dozens in recent days. The unrest escalated after Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s troops got involved.

In a dramatic moment caught live on Syrian TV, one of Israel’s airstrikes hit a government building in Damascus, forcing the anchor to duck for cover. Syrian officials said at least three people were killed in the strikes.

Syria and Neighbors Welcome Peace Effort

Ambassador Barrack posted on X (formerly Twitter) that Turkey, Jordan, and other countries in the region have “embraced” the deal.

“We call upon Druze, Bedouins, and Sunnis to put down their weapons,” Barrack wrote, urging all groups in Syria to come together and rebuild the country in peace.

So far, neither Syria nor Israel has officially commented on the ceasefire. But earlier this week, President al-Sharaa said Syrian forces were beginning to pull out of Suwayda, where most of the recent fighting took place. He also announced a local truce with the Druze factions.

Still, in a televised speech, al-Sharaa blamed Israel for trying to divide the Syrian people and turning Syria into a “battlefield of chaos.”

US Steps In With Diplomatic Push

The United States has been pushing hard behind the scenes to cool things down. Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan on Friday. Both sides reportedly agreed that all parties must follow through on peace commitments.

“This will require all parties to deliver on the commitments they have made, and this is what we fully expect them to do,” Rubio posted on X.

Amos Yadlin, a former Israeli intelligence chief, told CNN the international involvement is promising. But he warned that real peace depends on whether people on the ground stop retaliating.

What’s Next?

While the ceasefire is a positive step, it’s not yet clear if it will hold. Tensions remain high in southern Syria, and the country is still deeply divided. But with pressure from the U.S., Turkey, and Jordan, there’s a chance this could lead to more lasting peace talks — and maybe even a path toward rebuilding a war-torn nation.

Source: CNN – Israel and Syria agree to ceasefire, US ambassador to Turkey says

The post Israel and Syria Agree to Ceasefire After Airstrikes and Deadly Clashes appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Trump Hosts Netanyahu Amid Push for Middle East Peace

Former President Donald Trump hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a high-stakes dinner at the White House Monday night, with peace in the Middle East—and Trump’s political legacy—on the menu.

Netanyahu surprised Trump with a personal nomination letter for the Nobel Peace Prize, praising his efforts to broker peace in the region.

“He’s forging peace, as we speak, in one country, in one region after the other,” Netanyahu said as he handed Trump the nomination document. “This is well deserved, and you should get it.”

“Wow,” Trump replied, visibly moved. “Coming from you, this is very meaningful.”

Ceasefire Talks in Motion as Trump Applies Pressure

The dinner came as negotiators in Qatar worked to finalize a potential 60-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Trump’s foreign envoy, Steve Witkoff, is expected to join the ongoing discussions later this week—a sign that U.S. engagement in the peace process is intensifying.

The current proposal includes a phased release of hostages and expanded humanitarian aid to Gaza. While Israel quickly accepted the plan, Hamas responded positively but requested amendments, which Israel deemed “unacceptable.” Nonetheless, both sides agreed to continue with proximity talks.

Trump expressed confidence Monday, saying, “They want to meet and they want to have that ceasefire.”

Diplomatic Stakes: Trump Seeks a Legacy-Defining Deal

For Trump, brokering a Gaza ceasefire is more than a diplomatic win—it’s a key pillar of his vision for reshaping the region and cementing his legacy. He’s betting that a Gaza truce will unlock broader goals, including normalization of ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia as part of a broader expansion of the Abraham Accords.

Saudi Arabia, however, has maintained that peace with Israel is impossible while the war in Gaza continues, making a ceasefire essential to Trump’s wider ambitions.

Netanyahu echoed that sentiment: “I think we can work out a peace between us and the entire Middle East with President Trump’s leadership.”

U.S.-Israel Unity in Post-Iran Context

The meeting followed the recent U.S.-Israel bombing campaign that targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, a development that has reshaped dynamics in the region. Both Trump and Netanyahu have emerged from that military action politically bolstered.

“The prime minister’s coming to this meeting now much strengthened by Israel’s military victory over Iran,” said Michael Oren, former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. “The president is coming into this meeting much strengthened by America’s victory over Iran.”

Oren added that this momentum may allow both leaders to show greater flexibility in peace negotiations.

Controversial Ideas Linger in the Background

As part of broader post-war discussions, Trump’s previously floated idea of relocating Gaza’s population and transforming the area into a luxury development—what he once dubbed the “Riviera of the Middle East”—has resurfaced quietly.

Asked Monday whether that vision was still part of the plan, Trump deferred to Netanyahu.

“I think President Trump had a brilliant vision. It’s called free choice,” Netanyahu said. “If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave. It shouldn’t be a prison.”

Though the idea sparked outrage earlier this year, it remains unclear whether it holds any real traction in current diplomatic circles.

Final Push for a Breakthrough

After months of failed efforts and shifting regional alliances, this week may represent the closest both sides have come to a real breakthrough. But the success of a ceasefire hinges on Trump’s ability to persuade both Netanyahu and Hamas to agree on language that would end the war outright—something they have historically resisted.

Still, with Netanyahu’s public praise, a Nobel nomination in hand, and active negotiations underway, Trump is positioning himself as a central broker in what could become the region’s most consequential truce in years.

As Trump told reporters before returning to Washington: “I think there’s a good chance we have a deal with Hamas during the coming week, pertaining to quite a few of the hostages.”

Whether that prediction holds—and whether it brings Trump closer to the Nobel Prize he so openly covets—may soon be put to the test.

Source: CNN – Netanyahu plays into Trump’s hopes for Middle East peace — and nominates him for a Nobel Prize

The post Netanyahu Nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize Amid Gaza Ceasefire Push appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

As Ukraine faces one of its most intense waves of Russian attacks since the war began, the United States has decided to pause certain weapons shipments to Kyiv — a move that’s already sparking concern among Ukrainian leaders.

The White House confirmed the decision on Tuesday, saying it came after a Department of Defense review and was made to “put America’s interests first.” While officials did not specify which weapons are being withheld, reports suggest that Patriot air defense missiles, precision artillery rounds, and other high-demand munitions are affected.

Strategic Pause or Risky Timing?

This shift comes at a particularly sensitive time for Ukraine. Over the weekend, the country endured what it called the largest aerial assault since the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022 — more than 500 drones, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles were launched by Russian forces.

Ukrainian MP Fedir Venislavskyi, part of the ruling party, described the U.S. decision as “very unpleasant and painful,” especially in the face of ongoing “terrorist attacks” by Russia.

What’s Behind the U.S. Decision?

A U.S. official told CBS News the pause is driven by growing concerns that American stockpiles of advanced weaponry are running too low. Despite this, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly stressed that the strength of U.S. forces remains unquestioned, adding pointedly, “Just ask Iran.”

The Defense Department echoed this message. Undersecretary Elbridge Colby stated that the Pentagon remains committed to supporting Ukraine but is “rigorously examining” how to balance that aid with U.S. military readiness.

Trump and Zelensky: From Confrontation to Cooperation

The announcement also follows a recent meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during the NATO summit in the Netherlands. Though the two had previously clashed — most notably during a tense Oval Office meeting in March — Trump said their latest conversation was “very nice.”

He also suggested that the U.S. might still supply more Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, saying, “We are going to see if we can make some of them available.”

Earlier this year, Trump temporarily paused both military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine — suspensions that were later reversed. In April, a new deal between Washington and Kyiv was signed, giving the U.S. access to Ukraine’s valuable mineral reserves in exchange for continued military assistance.

International Talks and Russian Claims

Meanwhile, diplomacy saw a surprising development. French President Emmanuel Macron spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin for over two hours on Tuesday — their first direct conversation in more than two years. Macron called for a ceasefire and peace talks to achieve a “lasting resolution” to the war.

The Kremlin, however, doubled down. Putin reportedly told Macron that Western policies were to blame for the conflict, claiming that Russia’s security concerns had long been ignored. Just last month, Putin declared that “the whole of Ukraine is ours,” asserting a shared identity between Russians and Ukrainians.

On the Ground: Russia Advances, Ukraine Strikes Back

Russia continues to make slow but steady gains in Ukraine. This week, it claimed full control of the eastern Luhansk region and reported new territory captured in the southeastern Dnipropetrovsk region. Moscow now controls about 20% of Ukraine, including Crimea, annexed back in 2014.

But Ukraine isn’t backing down. On Tuesday, it launched a long-range strike on a weapons manufacturing plant in Izhevsk, deep inside Russian territory — more than 1,000 kilometers from the border. The attack killed at least three people and targeted a facility known for producing drones and radar systems.

Source: BBC – US halts some weapons shipments to Ukraine, White House says

The post U.S. Pauses Key Weapons Shipments to Ukraine Amid Rising Stockpile Concerns appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.