Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni’s $400M Countersuit Against Blake Lively in Escalating ‘It Ends With Us’ Battle

What began as a promising adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s bestselling novel It Ends With Us has unraveled into one of the most high-profile—and bitter—Hollywood legal showdowns of the year.

On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Liman dismissed actor-director Justin Baldoni’s $400 million countersuit against his co-star Blake Lively, marking the latest twist in a months-long legal feud marked by sexual harassment allegations, accusations of retaliation, and a high-stakes fight over creative control.

The Origins of the Dispute

The saga erupted publicly in December 2024, when Lively filed a lawsuit accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment and retaliatory behavior during the production of It Ends With Us, a film he directed and co-produced through his company, Wayfarer Studios. The lawsuit reportedly detailed uncomfortable on-set dynamics, creative clashes, and inappropriate conduct that Lively claims escalated when she pushed back against Baldoni’s authority on the project.

In January, Baldoni and Wayfarer hit back with a $400 million countersuit, alleging defamation and extortion—not just against Lively, but also her husband, actor Ryan Reynolds, her longtime publicist Leslie Sloane, and The New York Times, which had reported on the original harassment claims.

Baldoni’s legal team argued that Lively had schemed to wrest creative control of the project from him and damage his reputation in the process. They also claimed Lively threatened to boycott the film’s promotional tour if her demands weren’t met—an accusation that painted her as both unprofessional and manipulative.

But Judge Liman wasn’t persuaded.

The Judge’s Ruling

In his ruling, Liman systematically dismantled Baldoni’s legal claims. First, he noted that statements made in the course of a lawsuit are legally protected from defamation claims, shielding Lively from that charge. As for the extortion accusation—centered on Lively’s alleged threat not to promote the film—Liman found that Baldoni’s team failed to demonstrate that Lively was ever under a contractual obligation to participate in marketing activities.

“Wayfarer does not allege facts showing that Lively had an obligation to promote the film or to approve marketing materials,” the judge wrote.

Liman also rejected Baldoni’s lawsuit against The New York Times, calling it a “meritless attempt to stifle honest reporting.” The outlet had covered Lively’s allegations, prompting Baldoni to accuse the paper of defamation as well.

However, the judge left a narrow path forward for Baldoni’s team, stating they could revise and refile their claims if they focus specifically on breach of contract rather than defamation or extortion.

Lively’s Team Claims Victory

Lively’s attorneys, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, hailed the ruling as a comprehensive legal win. “Today’s opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively,” they said in a joint statement. “It also vindicates those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane, and The New York Times.”

The attorneys added that they plan to seek attorneys’ fees, treble damages, and punitive damages in the next phase of the legal proceedings.

The New York Times also welcomed the decision. “Our journalists covered a story of public importance with care and fairness, and the court recognized that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism,” said spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander.

As of publication, Baldoni’s legal team had not responded to requests for comment.

Behind the Film’s Success, On-Set Friction

At the heart of the dispute is It Ends With Us, a film based on Hoover’s 2016 novel that starts as a tender romance before descending into an unflinching look at domestic violence. The film was a commercial success when it debuted in August, pulling in over $50 million in its first weekend—a strong showing for a mid-budget drama.

But even before its release, whispers of friction between the stars had begun to surface. Insiders cited creative disagreements between Lively and Baldoni, who not only directed but also played a lead role in the film. The lawsuit confirmed what had long been speculated: the working relationship had soured to the point of litigation.

A Public Clash of Hollywood Personas

Both stars came into the project with significant fan followings and carefully cultivated public images. Lively, long admired for her style, wit, and roles in Gossip Girl, The Town, and The Shallows, has typically avoided scandal. Baldoni, meanwhile, gained fame on Jane the Virgin and later reinvented himself as a filmmaker and advocate for redefining masculinity, notably through his book Man Enough.

Their off-screen feud, playing out in court documents and media coverage, now threatens to overshadow the film’s artistic success—and may ripple through both of their careers.

For now, the courtroom battle seems to have tipped in Lively’s favor. But with hints of ongoing legal action and reputations on the line, this Hollywood drama may still have more acts to come.