In a pointed statement, the European Commission called for “full clarity” from Washington and stressed that both sides must respect the terms of a joint trade understanding reached last year. The development has introduced new tension into transatlantic ties at a time when global supply chains remain sensitive to abrupt policy shifts.

The dispute centers on tariffs announced by Trump and partially halted by the court. While U.S. officials insist existing agreements remain intact, European policymakers are openly questioning whether the current environment can sustain what they describe as fair and balanced trade.

Commission calls for commitments to be upheld

The European Commission, which negotiates trade policy on behalf of the EU’s 27 member states, said the current situation is not conducive to delivering “fair, balanced, and mutually beneficial” trade and investment as outlined in the EU-U.S. Joint Statement of August 2025.

Under that agreement, American and European negotiators settled on a framework imposing a 15% import tax on 70% of European goods exported to the United States. The arrangement was presented at the time as a stabilizing compromise after years of tariff disputes.

“A deal is a deal,” the Commission said, emphasizing that EU products should continue to benefit from the competitive treatment defined in the agreement, with no increases beyond the previously agreed ceiling.

The statement reflects mounting concern in Brussels that shifting signals from Washington could undermine business confidence. European officials argue that predictability is central to cross-border investment decisions and supply chain planning.

Trump criticizes ruling, floats higher global tariff

The controversy intensified after the Supreme Court of the United States struck down elements of Trump’s tariff program. The president criticized the ruling and said he would seek to introduce a global tariff rate of 15%, up from the 10% level announced a day earlier.

While details of how such a global tariff would interact with existing bilateral agreements remain unclear, the proposal has added to the uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policy.

Jamieson Greer, Trump’s top trade negotiator, said in an interview with CBS News that Washington intends to stand by its trade deals and expects partners to do the same. He said he had spoken with his European counterpart and had not been told that the agreement was being abandoned.

“The deals were not premised on whether or not the emergency tariff litigation would rise or fall,” Greer said. “They want to see how this plays out.”

His comments appeared aimed at reassuring markets that the underlying trade framework remains in force, even as legal and political challenges continue.

European Parliament voice raises ratification concerns

In Brussels, political reaction has been sharper. Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s international trade committee, said he would propose pausing the ratification process of the agreement.

Lange described the situation as “pure tariff chaos” on the part of the U.S. administration, arguing that unpredictability makes it difficult for lawmakers and businesses to assess future conditions.

Although the European Parliament does not directly negotiate trade deals, it plays a crucial role in ratifying them. A pause in that process would signal deeper institutional unease within the bloc.

Vast trade relationship at stake

The scale of EU-U.S. trade underscores the significance of the dispute. According to Eurostat, the EU’s statistics agency, the total value of goods and services exchanged between the two economies reached 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in 2024 — roughly 4.6 billion euros per day.

Europe’s main exports to the United States include pharmaceuticals, cars, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments, and wine and spirits. The U.S., in turn, exports professional and scientific services such as payment systems and cloud infrastructure, along with oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, aerospace products, and vehicles.

Given the breadth of this exchange, even modest tariff changes can ripple across sectors ranging from manufacturing to technology services. The Commission warned that unpredictable tariff application is inherently disruptive, eroding confidence and destabilizing supply chains.

Potential EU response mechanisms

As primarily a trading bloc, the EU has tools to respond if it concludes that undue pressure is being applied. One such mechanism is the bloc’s Anti-Coercion Instrument, designed to counter economic measures deemed coercive.

The instrument allows the EU to restrict trade and investment flows, bar companies from public tenders, or limit foreign direct investment from targeted countries. In its most severe application, it could effectively restrict access to the EU’s market of roughly 450 million consumers.

While officials have not indicated that such measures are imminent, the reference underscores the seriousness with which Brussels views compliance with trade agreements.

A test for transatlantic economic stability

The standoff highlights the fragility of transatlantic trade stability at a time when geopolitical tensions and economic realignment are reshaping global commerce. Businesses on both sides of the Atlantic have generally favored predictable, rules-based trade arrangements, particularly after years of tariff volatility.

For now, both Washington and Brussels say the agreement remains in place. Yet the combination of court intervention, political reaction, and fresh tariff proposals has introduced a layer of ambiguity that markets will be watching closely in the weeks ahead.

Whether the dispute evolves into a broader renegotiation or settles into legal clarification may determine the next phase of EU-U.S. economic ties.

Source: AP News – EU says US must honor a trade deal after court blocks Trump tariffs

The post EU Demands U.S. Honor Trade Deal After Supreme Court Blocks Trump Tariffs appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: October 12, 2025, 23:40 EDT

U.S. markets endured their sharpest decline in months on Friday after former President Donald Trump signaled the possibility of sharply increasing tariffs on Chinese imports. The remarks, delivered via social media, rattled global investors and reignited fears of renewed trade conflict between the world’s two largest economies.

Stocks Slide as Tariff Fears Grip Investors

Wall Street’s months of relative calm came to an abrupt halt when Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that he was considering a “massive increase of tariffs” on goods from China. His statement, criticizing Beijing’s export restrictions on critical rare earth materials, sent shockwaves through financial markets already viewed as overvalued.

The S&P 500 fell 2.7%, marking its worst single-day performance since April. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 878 points, or 1.9%, while the Nasdaq composite tumbled 3.6%.

Before the remarks, markets had been trending toward modest gains. The sudden shift reflected renewed investor anxiety about trade disruptions that could hamper corporate earnings and global economic growth.

Trade Tensions Reignite Between Washington and Beijing

Trump’s comments appeared to be in response to China’s recent curbs on exports of rare earth elements — materials crucial for producing semiconductors, smartphones, and aircraft engines. “We have been contacted by other countries who are extremely angry at this great trade hostility,” Trump wrote. He added that he saw “no reason” to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping, despite earlier plans to hold talks during an upcoming trip to South Korea.

The renewed friction between the United States and China quickly rippled through global markets. Roughly six out of every seven stocks within the S&P 500 closed lower, including major technology firms such as Nvidia and Apple, as well as smaller industrial and consumer companies sensitive to tariffs.

Market Valuations Face Scrutiny Amid Rising Risks

Even before Friday’s sell-off, many analysts had warned that U.S. stocks were trading at stretched valuations following a near-continuous 35% rally in the S&P 500 since April. Critics argued that corporate profits had not grown fast enough to justify the market’s pace of gains.

The decline intensified concerns about speculative behavior in the artificial intelligence sector, where some analysts see parallels with the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s. “For prices to look reasonable again, either earnings must rise or prices must fall,” said one market strategist.

Corporate Spotlight: Levi Strauss Hit Hard Despite Strong Earnings

Among individual stocks, Levi Strauss & Co. saw one of the day’s steepest losses, plunging 12.6%. The jeans manufacturer reported better-than-expected quarterly profits but failed to meet investors’ heightened expectations after a 42% surge earlier in the year.

Market analysts suggested that the stock’s decline reflected a broader reassessment of retail valuations rather than company-specific weakness.

Energy Prices Fall as Mideast Ceasefire Lowers Risk Premium

Oil markets also turned sharply lower. Benchmark U.S. crude dropped 4.2% to $58.90 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international standard, slid 3.8% to $62.73.

The declines followed news of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, easing concerns about potential disruptions to Middle Eastern oil supplies. Analysts said Trump’s tariff threat further fueled selling pressure, as expectations rose that slower trade could dampen fuel demand.

Bond Yields Fall as Investors Seek Safety

In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury slipped to 4.05% from 4.14% the previous day, reflecting increased demand for safe-haven assets.

Yields had already been declining before Trump’s remarks, partly due to a University of Michigan consumer sentiment report showing that Americans remain pessimistic about inflation and employment prospects.

“Pocketbook issues like high prices and weakening job prospects remain at the forefront of consumers’ minds,” said Joanne Hsu, director of the university’s Surveys of Consumers. The survey also found that short-term inflation expectations edged slightly lower to 4.6%, down from 4.7% in the previous month — a small but potentially encouraging sign for the Federal Reserve.

Fed Balances Rate Cuts Against Inflation Pressure

The Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate last month for the first time this year, aiming to bolster the economy amid slowing job growth. Policymakers have hinted at additional rate cuts through next year, but Fed Chair Jerome Powell has emphasized that the central bank remains vigilant about inflation risks.

Lower interest rates can stimulate spending but also risk fueling higher prices. Economists say the Fed’s challenge will be maintaining growth without reigniting inflation that erodes household purchasing power.

Global Markets Mirror Wall Street Decline

The sell-off extended overseas, with major indexes across Europe and Asia closing lower. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng fell 1.7%, France’s CAC 40 dropped 1.5%, while South Korea’s Kospi rose 1.7% after reopening from a holiday closure.

Analysts said the global reaction underscored the extent to which U.S. trade policy remains a key driver of worldwide market sentiment.

Source: AP News – Wall Street tumbles to its worst day since April after Trump threatens more tariffs on China

The post Wall Street Suffers Steepest Drop Since April After Trump Hints at Higher China Tariffs appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

While President Trump has hyped the upcoming announcement as a “major trade deal,” the reality is more modest. Here’s a breakdown of what to expect—and what it means for both sides.

Not a Trade Deal—But Still Significant

Despite the fanfare, this isn’t a comprehensive trade agreement. President Trump doesn’t have the authority to sign one without congressional approval. What’s coming instead is a limited pact focused on reducing or exempting specific tariffs.

The goal? A quick-win agreement before the 90-day pause on Trump’s original tariffs expires. So don’t expect sweeping changes—at least not yet.

A Narrow, Short-Term Arrangement

This deal is likely to be a bare-bones framework. Officials expect it to be short-term and narrowly focused on key industries rather than a broad overhaul.

The blanket 10% tariff on most UK goods entering the US is expected to stay in place. However, the UK may secure relief from the harsher 25% tariffs that hit some of its biggest exports—particularly in the automotive and steel sectors.

Autos Take Center Stage

The UK’s top export to the US—cars—could be at the heart of this deal. Last year, UK car exports to the US were worth about £9 billion.

Trump’s 25% tariffs on car imports have hit the industry hard. The new agreement could lower those tariffs or introduce a quota system, which would allow a fixed number of UK-made cars to enter the US tariff-free. Anything above that limit would face extra charges.

While UK manufacturers prefer a blanket tariff cut, a quota would still offer some breathing room. On the UK side, tariffs on US car imports—currently at 10%—are expected to be lowered. The US wants that rate slashed to 2.5%, and UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves has signaled a willingness to consider it.

Steel and Aluminium in the Spotlight

Steel and aluminium have been subject to a 25% US import tariff since March. Although the UK exports only about £700 million worth of raw steel and aluminium, products made from these materials—like gym equipment and machinery—make up a further £2.2 billion in exports.

Industry leaders warn that without relief, these tariffs could be devastating. They could also flood the global market with excess steel, putting more pressure on UK producers already struggling with competition and high energy costs.

Whether the deal offers lower tariffs or a quota system for these sectors remains to be seen.

The Big Unknown: Pharmaceuticals

One area still in the dark is pharmaceuticals. The UK exported £6.6 billion in medicinal and pharmaceutical products to the US last year—making it the second-biggest export category. The US, meanwhile, sent £4 billion worth of drugs the other way.

While medicines typically avoid tariffs under global agreements aimed at keeping healthcare affordable, there’s always the risk of future restrictions. For now, no new pharmaceutical tariffs have been announced by the Trump administration.

A Possible Trade-Off: Digital Services Tax

Another potential part of the bargain? The UK may agree to reduce its 2% digital services tax on US tech giants like Meta, Google, and Apple in exchange for tariff relief on exports like cars and pharmaceuticals.

The UK brought in around £360 million from the tax in its first year, but it’s a politically sensitive issue. Cutting it could be seen as bowing to pressure from Big Tech—or from President Trump.

Food Standards Off the Table

Although agricultural tariffs could be adjusted, don’t expect the UK to budge on food standards.

Chancellor Reeves has made it clear that imports like chlorinated chicken or hormone-treated beef will remain banned. The UK is prioritizing alignment with EU food safety rules, especially with a planned “Brexit reset” on the horizon.

American farmers have long pushed for more access to UK markets, but backing off these demands—even temporarily—would be seen as a diplomatic win for Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Bottom Line

This UK-US tariff deal isn’t the sweeping trade agreement some headlines might suggest. But for key industries like automotive, steel, and tech, it could offer targeted relief—and help prevent further economic strain on both sides of the Atlantic.

As always, the devil will be in the details—and in the months of negotiations still to come.

Source: BBC – What could be in the UK-US tariff deal?

The post What the New UK-US Tariff Deal Could Mean for Cars, Steel, and Tech appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

As the U.S.-China trade war continues to escalate, one key difference between the iPhone and Samsung Galaxy may matter more than ever: the countries where these smartphones are assembled.

Unlike Apple, which remains heavily reliant on Chinese manufacturing, Samsung has diversified its production across several countries, including South Korea, Vietnam, India, and Brazil. This strategic shift could give Samsung an advantage as the U.S. ramps up tariffs on Chinese imports, particularly smartphones.

Apple’s production is still deeply tied to China, with estimates suggesting that around 90% of iPhones are assembled there, according to Wedbush Securities. While Apple has shifted some production to countries like India, the bulk of its phones still come from China. This dependency has made Apple vulnerable to the impact of the U.S.-China trade tensions and tariffs, which can drastically affect prices and profit margins.

In contrast, Samsung closed its last phone factory in China in 2019, after losing market share to local competitors. Today, the majority of Samsung smartphones are manufactured in Vietnam, India, South Korea, and Brazil—countries that aren’t directly targeted by Trump’s tariff policies. According to Counterpoint Research, about 90% of Samsung’s smartphone production takes place in Vietnam alone.

While Apple has received some relief from the tariffs targeting consumer tech devices, the looming threat of new tariffs on semiconductors—the essential components for electronics—could hit Apple harder than Samsung. The tech giant’s dependence on Chinese supply chains means it could face higher costs and potentially higher retail prices if tariffs increase.

Samsung, however, stands in a better position due to its diversified production footprint. With significant operations in countries like India and Vietnam, Samsung may avoid the worst of the tariff burdens. As Gerrit Schneemann, senior analyst at Counterpoint Research, puts it: “The advantage is, yes, they’re not facing the crazy numbers that Apple is dealing with.”

However, while Samsung may be insulated from some of the tariff effects, it doesn’t guarantee an immediate surge in sales. Analysts caution that Samsung’s market share might not increase overnight. “There’s not a direct line to turning that into just an exponential boost in sales,” Schneemann adds.

Apple’s pricing strategy is aimed at premium devices, with only a few high-end models in its lineup, ensuring it maintains higher margins. Samsung, on the other hand, offers a broader range of devices, including budget-friendly options through its Galaxy A series, which dominate the lower end of the market.

This difference in strategy means that while Apple may suffer more from price hikes due to tariffs, Samsung’s larger variety of phones might help it capture a wider array of consumers, particularly in price-sensitive markets. However, even with this advantage, analysts remain cautious about whether Samsung can pull customers away from the loyal Apple base.

Even with Samsung’s diversified production, the broader economic effects of the trade war and tariffs could hurt both companies. If consumer prices rise due to tariffs on imports from China, the economic strain may cause consumers to delay upgrading their devices. “Daily necessities and essentials are going to be higher on the list than maybe a new or upgraded smartphone,” Schneemann notes, particularly in mature markets like the U.S.

This shift could slow the growth of the smartphone market, especially in emerging economies, where demand for affordable smartphones has been rising steadily. Rising costs and a potential economic slowdown could lead consumers to hold onto their existing devices for longer periods, impacting overall smartphone sales.

While the tariff war may provide Samsung with a temporary advantage, the ongoing uncertainty in the global economy and tech supply chains makes the future unpredictable. As analysts from Wedbush Securities suggest, urgent negotiations with China are crucial to avoid further economic damage.

For now, Samsung’s global manufacturing footprint gives it a cushion against the most severe effects of tariffs. However, both companies will need to navigate a complex and volatile landscape if they hope to maintain growth and stay competitive in an increasingly unpredictable market.

Source: CNN – The iPhone’s biggest rival may have one advantage in Trump’s tariff war

The post Why Samsung’s Global Manufacturing Could Give It an Edge Over Apple appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Nintendo’s upcoming Switch 2 may be facing challenges from new U.S. trade tariffs, but one analyst believes the company will hold firm on its $450 launch price despite these pressures. And even with a lowered sales forecast, the Switch 2 is still set to become the fastest-selling gaming console in history.

Following the announcement of hefty new U.S. tariffs, which hit products from key manufacturing regions like Japan, there was speculation that Nintendo might raise the price of its highly anticipated Switch 2. However, David Cole, founder of DFC Intelligence, isn’t convinced that will happen. He told Eurogamer that Nintendo is likely to stick to the original $450 price, even with the looming tariff threat. According to Cole, the $450 figure was already set with the potential for tariffs in mind, making a price hike unlikely at launch.

While Nintendo may not raise prices initially, the tariffs—especially a 24% levy on Japanese goods—could force the company to increase prices down the line. DFC Intelligence revised its 2025 sales forecast for the Switch 2 from 17 million units to 15 million. The reason? A potential 20% price increase over the next couple of years. Higher prices could deter some buyers, with many likely to delay their purchases until the price drops.

Cole points out that Nintendo is known for being conservative with production. The company could hold back on early shipments to avoid creating surplus inventory if demand doesn’t match expectations. “They may take a wait-and-see approach given the uncertainty around tariffs and supply chain issues,” Cole adds.

Even with a revised forecast, DFC predicts the Switch 2 will smash sales records. Shifting 15 million units in 2025 would still make it the fastest-selling gaming console of all time, surpassing the success of its predecessor, the original Nintendo Switch. And there’s more to come. As the console matures, DFC sees an enormous potential for long-term sales, particularly with the Switch 2’s expanded appeal.

The firm highlights that the Switch 2’s focus on capturing new consumer segments—beyond just hardcore Nintendo fans—could push it into more competitive territory with Sony and Microsoft. “This shift in strategy could be transformative for the gaming industry,” says DFC. Nintendo, once seen as operating in a niche market, is now poised to engage with a broader audience and become a serious contender across various gaming genres.

Despite the ongoing tariff issues and the delay of U.S. preorders, the Switch 2 is still on track for its global launch on June 5. However, Nintendo has indefinitely delayed U.S. preorders, with a ripple effect in Canada as the company seeks to align both regions’ preorder schedules.

Nintendo isn’t the only company feeling the effects of the Trump-era tariffs. The Entertainment Software Association (ESA) warned earlier this month that the tariffs would “have a real and detrimental impact” on the video games industry overall. As tariffs continue to hit manufacturers, the entire gaming ecosystem could face higher costs and delays, making the Switch 2’s launch an even more high-stakes moment in the industry.

Despite the uncertainty surrounding tariffs, Nintendo’s Switch 2 is gearing up to make history with its debut. Whether it faces price hikes down the line or not, the console’s innovative design and expanded audience could make it a true game-changer for the industry.

Source: Eurogamer – Nintendo likely to stick with Switch 2’s $450 launch price despite Trump tariffs, says analyst

The post Nintendo Sticks to $450 Price for Switch 2 Despite Tariff Concerns appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Exports to the U.S. have long been a contentious issue in trade talks between Japan and the U.S., particularly under President Donald Trump’s administration. Negotiators from Japan are currently in Washington, lobbying against the threat of higher tariffs on Japanese goods. Japan, a key U.S. ally and major investor, employs hundreds of thousands of Americans, making it an integral part of the U.S. economy.

In early April, President Trump announced plans to impose a 24% tariff on imports from Japan as part of broader trade measures against multiple countries. However, following panic in the financial markets, Trump placed a partial 90-day hold on the tariff hike while simultaneously raising existing tariffs on Chinese goods to up to 145%.

Despite the temporary delay, Japan still faces significant tariff challenges. A 10% baseline tariff on various imports remains in place, along with a 25% tax on Japanese car imports, auto parts, and steel and aluminum exports. These duties have already taken a toll and present a challenge for Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s administration.

In response to the tariff tensions, some analysts speculate that Japan might make surprise concessions to ease trade relations. One potential move could involve increasing imports of American rice—an item of cultural significance in Japan. Historically, Japan has protected its rice industry, but rising domestic prices due to a shortage might prompt a shift in policy.

Despite the trade deficit, Japan’s exports saw a 5.9% increase over the past year, driven by strong shipments of computer chips and vehicles. Meanwhile, imports rose by 4.7%, with the weaker yen making imported goods more expensive.

Another factor contributing to the rise in exports is the recent surge in foreign tourism to Japan. Tourist spending counts as an export, further boosting Japan’s economic performance.

For the month of March, Japan recorded a trade surplus of 544 billion yen ($4 billion), with exports climbing nearly 4% from the previous year. This marked the sixth consecutive month of export gains, though the pace of growth slowed compared to February.

Exports to the U.S. rose by 3%, while shipments to other parts of Asia, such as Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea, grew by 5.5%. On the other hand, exports to China fell, reflecting a shift in trade patterns due to ongoing U.S.-China tariff conflicts.

Min Joo Kang, a senior economist at ING, noted that the rerouting of exports within Asia to avoid U.S. tariffs likely contributed to the increased shipments to neighboring countries. This strategy is a part of Japan’s broader efforts to mitigate the impact of the global trade tensions.

As Japan continues to navigate its complex trade relationships with the U.S., the outcome of these negotiations could shape the future of its economic growth and global trade standing.

Source: AP News – Japan reports a $63 billion trade surplus with the US as it talks with Trump on tariffs

The post Japan Reports $63 Billion Trade Surplus with the U.S. Amid Tariff Talks appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Despite the impressive numbers, analysts caution that the second-largest economy in the world could face significant challenges ahead. The escalating trade war between the U.S. and China has clouded the outlook, with tariffs on Chinese products likely to weigh heavily on future growth. As China braces for further economic turbulence, Beijing remains focused on diversifying its markets and opening up new trade opportunities.

In the January-March period, Chinese exports surged by more than 12%, driven by companies trying to ship products before tariffs hit. U.S. dollar-denominated exports also rose nearly 6% in the first quarter, helping to prop up industrial production, which grew by 6.5% year-on-year.

Notably, sectors tied to advanced technologies saw massive gains. The production of electric vehicles and 3D printers jumped 45%, while industrial robots saw a 26% increase in output. These sectors have become crucial to China’s strategy for future economic development, moving beyond traditional manufacturing to focus on high-tech industries.

However, the looming tariffs, which have already escalated to 145% on most Chinese exports to the U.S., are expected to have a lasting impact. In fact, UBS economists predict that China’s exports to the U.S. could drop by two-thirds in the coming months, and its global exports might fall by 10%.

While the trade war has created uncertainty, Chinese officials are actively seeking to diversify trade partnerships. Chinese President Xi Jinping is on a diplomatic tour in Southeast Asia, visiting Vietnam, Malaysia, and Cambodia to promote free trade and bolster China’s role as a source of “stability and certainty” amid global uncertainty.

The push for new markets is evident at China’s annual Canton trade fair in Guangzhou, where exporters like Wallace Huang of Guangdong Weking Group are emphasizing the need to expand beyond the U.S. market. “When the West is dark, the East is bright,” Huang said, reflecting a growing sentiment among exporters to reduce dependency on American buyers.

Despite the strong export performance, China’s domestic economy is showing signs of strain. Consumer prices fell by 0.1% in Q1, indicating weaker-than-expected demand in many sectors. The real estate market, a key driver of China’s economic growth in past years, continues to struggle. Investment in housing dropped nearly 10%, despite government efforts to stimulate the sector.

With unemployment rising and consumer confidence shaky, Beijing faces a delicate balancing act. While it pushes for increased investment and consumer spending, the uncertainty surrounding the tariffs crisis adds another layer of complexity to the country’s economic strategy.

Looking ahead, economists are divided on the outlook for China’s economy. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Asian Development Bank remain cautiously optimistic, projecting around 4.6% growth for 2025. However, private-sector economists, particularly those at UBS, are more pessimistic. They have cut their growth forecast to just 3.4% for this year, down from a previous estimate of 4%, and expect the slowdown to deepen in the years ahead.

President Trump’s shifting stance on trade tariffs only adds to the uncertainty, making it difficult for analysts to predict how the situation will evolve. While the U.S. has imposed tariffs as high as 145%, China is responding with tariffs of its own, with 125% tariffs on American exports.

In response to the economic pressures, China has been doubling down on measures to boost consumer spending. This includes subsidies for electric vehicles, appliance trade-ins, and increased funding for struggling sectors like housing. These efforts are part of a broader push to stimulate domestic demand and reduce the economy’s reliance on exports.

Despite these efforts, the road ahead is fraught with challenges. As China navigates a complex economic landscape, the effects of the trade war, coupled with slowing domestic growth, could pose significant hurdles in the months and years to come.

While China’s economy showed resilience in the first quarter of 2025, the looming impact of escalating tariffs presents a serious challenge. As the country works to diversify its export markets and stimulate domestic growth, the long-term effects of the U.S.-China trade war remain uncertain. Only time will tell how China adapts to these economic pressures and whether it can continue its growth trajectory amid a volatile global environment.

Source: AP News – China’s economy grew 5.4% in the first quarter as exporters rushed to beat Trump’s tariffs

The post Strong Exports Drive China’s Economic Growth, But Tariffs Loom Ahead appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a strategic move to bolster their economies, the leaders of Mexico and Brazil have agreed to deepen their trade relations, especially in response to the ongoing global uncertainty caused by U.S. President Donald Trump’s fluctuating tariff policies. The decision comes at a time when both Latin American giants are looking for reliable trade partners beyond the shifting U.S. stance on tariffs.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva met at a regional summit in Honduras, where they discussed a range of issues, including Trump’s trade wars and the impact of escalating deportations. The two leaders agreed that strengthening the economic ties between their countries is essential for stability and growth in the region.

Lula expressed his enthusiasm about the new initiative on social media, writing: “We decided to further strengthen relations between our two countries by promoting regular meetings between our governments and the business sectors of Brazil and Mexico.” This move reflects a shared commitment to building a robust trade partnership amid global challenges.

The summit, attended by 11 heads of state and 20 representatives from Latin America and the Caribbean, emphasized the importance of unity in the face of growing global tensions. Sheinbaum highlighted the necessity for solidarity, stating, “Today more than ever is a good time to recognize that Latin America and the Caribbean require unity and solidarity.”

This message resonated deeply among the leaders, who are increasingly looking for ways to protect their economies from the uncertainty stemming from the U.S. trade war and other international pressures.

In a move that has added to global economic chaos, President Trump recently announced a 90-day suspension of tariffs on most countries, with the exception of China, which continues to face a 125% tariff hike. Although this temporary pause may offer some relief, many of the U.S.’s trading partners are frustrated by the unpredictability of Trump’s policies, prompting them to seek out new trade alternatives.

Even with the tariff suspension, the cloud of uncertainty remains, as countries across the globe struggle to navigate the turbulent waters of international trade under Trump’s leadership. The shifting tariffs have left many wondering whether they can continue relying on the U.S. as a trade partner.

Adding fuel to the fire, Trump’s controversial deportation policies have sparked growing legal and human rights concerns. Critics argue that the administration’s approach infringes on the sovereignty of foreign nations, particularly when it comes to security-related actions.

One such example is U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s comments about Chinese activity in the Panama Canal, which he labeled a security threat. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is reportedly exploring the use of drone strikes against Mexican cartels—an idea that Sheinbaum has firmly rejected. “We do not agree with any kind of intervention or interference,” she said in a recent press conference.

As the global landscape continues to shift, Mexico and Brazil’s decision to strengthen their ties signals a turning point for Latin American unity. By focusing on collaboration, both countries hope to not only navigate the economic challenges posed by the U.S. but also create a more stable and prosperous future for the region.

Source: AP News – Mexico and Brazil agree to strengthen trade ties in the wake of Trump tariff turmoil

The post Mexico and Brazil Form Stronger Trade Alliance in Response to Trump’s Tariffs appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Caught in the Trade War Crossfire

Walmart is feeling the heat as tensions rise between the United States and China over escalating tariffs. Chinese officials confirmed on Thursday that they had met with executives from the U.S. retail giant following reports that Walmart pressured its Chinese suppliers for discounts to offset the impact of new tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.

“Our relevant departments have reached out to Walmart to further understand the situation, and the company has provided an explanation,” said He Yongqian, a spokesperson for China’s Commerce Ministry. However, no further details were provided.

Trump’s Tariff Hike Sparks Backlash

Last week, President Trump doubled tariffs on all Chinese imports, raising them to 20%. In retaliation, China imposed fresh tariffs on U.S. agricultural imports, which took effect on Monday.

Many businesses are struggling to adjust to the rapid shifts in trade policy, with retailers warning of potential price hikes as inflation squeezes consumers. Walmart, the world’s largest retailer, is no exception.

Walmart’s Request for Supplier Discounts

To mitigate the financial strain, Bloomberg reported that Walmart has asked some of its Chinese vendors for price cuts of up to 10%. The move aims to absorb the cost of U.S. levies without significantly raising prices for American consumers.

However, Walmart’s approach has not gone unnoticed by Chinese authorities. On Wednesday, state broadcaster CCTV’s social media platform, Yuyuantantian, posted a warning, stating:

“Walmart’s demand for Chinese suppliers to bear the full tariff burden is unreasonable and disrupts fair competition and international trade order.”

The post also hinted that Chinese authorities could take further action if Walmart continues pressing suppliers for lower prices.

Chinese Suppliers Already Under Pressure

While price negotiations are common in China’s business landscape, Walmart’s request comes at a time when many Chinese manufacturers are already struggling with thin profit margins. Increased production costs and supply chain disruptions have made it challenging for suppliers to offer additional discounts.

In a statement to CNN, Walmart defended its actions, stating:

“Our goal is to help people save money and live better. Our conversations with suppliers are aimed at making that a reality for millions of customers. We will continue to work closely with them to navigate these uncertain times.”

Walmart’s Significant Presence in China

Walmart is not just a major U.S. retailer sourcing products from China—it also has a thriving business within the country. The company entered China in 1996 and opened its first superstore and Sam’s Club in Shenzhen.

Today, Walmart operates in more than 100 Chinese cities. In its most recent financial year, the company reported a 16% increase in net sales, reaching $17 billion in China.

What’s Next?

As the U.S.-China trade war intensifies, Walmart’s operations in both countries remain vulnerable to ongoing tensions. If Chinese authorities decide to take action against the retailer, Walmart could face further challenges in its supply chain and market position.

For now, Walmart is walking a tightrope—balancing its relationship with Chinese suppliers while trying to shield American consumers from rising prices.

Source

The post Walmart Under Pressure in China After Trump’s Tariff Hike appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The EU, having anticipated the move, was prepared for retaliation. However, the new tariffs add further strain to already fragile trade relations between the two economic powerhouses. Just last month, Washington warned Europe that it would need to take greater responsibility for its own security in the future.

Scope of the EU Tariffs

The retaliatory tariffs will affect approximately €26 billion ($28 billion) worth of U.S. goods, including not only steel and aluminum but also textiles, home appliances, and various agricultural products. Among the targeted goods are motorcycles, bourbon, peanut butter, and jeans—items that were also subject to tariffs during former President Donald Trump’s first term.

The EU’s tariff strategy is designed to exert pressure on key Republican-held states while minimizing additional harm to European industries. The new duties will significantly impact U.S. agricultural exports, targeting soybeans from Louisiana (House Speaker Mike Johnson’s state), as well as beef and poultry from Kansas and Nebraska. Other affected states include Alabama, Georgia, and Virginia, which produce key agricultural exports now facing increased EU duties.

EU Defends Its Trade Actions

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen defended the EU’s decision, emphasizing the bloc’s commitment to negotiation while ensuring fair trade policies.

“As the U.S. applies tariffs worth $28 billion, we are responding with countermeasures worth €26 billion,” von der Leyen stated. The European Commission, which oversees trade policy for the 27-nation bloc, emphasized the necessity of these countermeasures to balance trade relations.

“In a world fraught with geopolitical and economic uncertainties, it is not in our common interest to burden our economies with tariffs,” she added.

The commission confirmed that its countermeasures would target steel, aluminum, textiles, leather goods, home appliances, household tools, plastics, wood, and agricultural products such as poultry, beef, seafood, nuts, eggs, sugar, and vegetables.

Trump defended his tariffs, claiming they would boost American manufacturing jobs. However, von der Leyen countered, warning of the economic repercussions:

“Jobs are at stake. Prices will go up—both in Europe and the United States. These tariffs are disrupting supply chains and creating economic uncertainty.”

American Business Groups Urge De-escalation

The American Chamber of Commerce to the EU criticized both the U.S. tariffs and the EU’s countermeasures, warning that they could harm employment and economic prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic.

“These measures will only hurt jobs, prosperity, and security,” the chamber stated. “Both sides must de-escalate and urgently seek a negotiated solution.”

What Happens Next?

This is not the first time the U.S. and EU have engaged in a trade dispute under Trump’s leadership. During his first term, the former president imposed similar tariffs on European steel and aluminum, prompting the EU to retaliate with tariffs on U.S.-made motorcycles, bourbon, peanut butter, and jeans.

The EU’s latest action will unfold in two phases:

1. April 1: The European Commission will reinstate “rebalancing measures” that were previously in place between 2018 and 2020 before being suspended under the Biden administration.
2. April 13: Additional duties will take effect, impacting €18 billion ($19.6 billion) in U.S. exports to the EU.

EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič recently visited Washington in an attempt to prevent the escalation. After meeting with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and other trade officials, he stated, “It became clear during the trip that the EU is not the problem.”

“I argued to avoid the unnecessary burden of measures and countermeasures, but you need a partner for that. You need both hands to clap,” Šefčovič said in remarks to the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France.

Impact on European Steel Industry

The European steel sector is bracing for losses, as the EU could lose up to 3.7 million tons of steel exports. The U.S. is the second-largest export market for European steel, accounting for 16% of total EU steel exports, according to the European steel association Eurofer.

With annual trade between the U.S. and EU valued at around $1.5 trillion, representing approximately 30% of global trade, the ongoing tariff dispute threatens to disrupt economic stability. While the EU maintains a significant export surplus in goods, the U.S. holds a surplus in the trade of services.

UK Takes a Different Approach

Unlike the EU, Britain has decided not to impose retaliatory measures on U.S. imports. British Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds stated that the UK would continue to engage “closely and productively” with the U.S. to protect British business interests.

However, Reynolds did not rule out future tariffs, stating, “We will keep all options on the table and won’t hesitate to respond in the national interest.”

Conclusion

The latest round of tariffs marks another chapter in the ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and EU. While both sides assert their positions, businesses and consumers are likely to bear the economic burden. As pressure mounts, diplomatic negotiations remain the most viable path toward de-escalation and trade stability.

Source

The post Europe Strikes Back: New Tariffs on U.S. Goods After Trump’s Move appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.