A recent report from AidData highlights that the United States has received more funding from Chinese state-owned banks than any other country, totaling $200 billion over the past quarter-century. The financing, often routed through offshore shell companies, has targeted high-tech sectors with potential national security implications. Analysts warn this hidden network reflects a strategic, long-term approach by Beijing to secure global technological influence.

Hidden Lending Networks Across the Globe

China’s state-controlled banks have extended extensive loans to U.S. companies, frequently obscured through shell entities in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, and Delaware. The AidData report details a sophisticated lending network extending beyond developing nations to wealthy allies including the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and the Netherlands.

Former White House investment adviser William Henagan described the network as “China playing chess while the rest of us played checkers,” emphasizing the potential for these financial flows to give Beijing leverage over critical technologies.

Targeting Strategic Technology Sectors

Much of the funding has facilitated Chinese acquisitions of U.S. firms in robotics, semiconductors, and biotechnology. The transactions often remained opaque due to intermediary companies, masking the involvement of Chinese state banks.

The report cites specific examples:

• In 2015, Chinese state-owned banks provided $1.2 billion to acquire an 80% stake in Ironshore, an insurer serving clients including U.S. intelligence personnel. The transaction was initially hidden via a Cayman Islands entity.

• In 2016, China’s Export–Import Bank funded $150 million to support the acquisition of a Michigan-based robotics equipment company, following Beijing’s publication of its “Made in China 2025” industrial strategy.

• By 2017, Chinese-backed entities attempted to acquire a U.S. semiconductor company through Delaware-based shell firms, a deal blocked after investigators traced state ownership.

These examples illustrate a deliberate focus on high-tech and sensitive industries, aligning with Beijing’s broader strategy to secure technological self-sufficiency and global influence.

Global Expansion of Chinese State Lending

AidData’s findings show China has lent more than $2 trillion worldwide from 2000 through 2023, double previous estimates. Beyond the U.S., state lending targeted critical minerals, semiconductors, and other high-tech assets in Europe and allied nations.

Brad Parks, AidData executive director, noted: “The irony is stark — the U.S. warns about predatory Chinese lending, yet it has received the largest share of these state-directed loans.”

Evolving Oversight and Regulatory Challenges

U.S. authorities have strengthened scrutiny through mechanisms such as the interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Screening measures were bolstered in 2020 to safeguard sensitive sectors. Despite these efforts, China has expanded overseas bank branches, lending via offshore entities, complicating transparency and regulatory enforcement.

Scott Nathan, former head of the U.S. International Development Finance Corp., emphasized the difficulty in tracing these transactions due to layers of secrecy, shell companies, and confidentiality agreements.

Implications for National Security and Geoeconomics

Experts highlight the strategic dimension of these loans. Brad Setser, adviser to the U.S. Trade Representative, described the practice as part of a broader effort by China to control economic chokepoints and gain leverage over critical technologies.

High-tech sectors targeted include robotics, biotechnology, quantum computing, and semiconductors — essential components for defense systems, telecom networks, and advanced industrial infrastructure. Such acquisitions could allow Beijing indirect access to technology with potential military applications.

Case Studies in Strategic Lending

• In 2017, a Chinese state-backed Delaware private equity firm attempted to acquire a U.S. semiconductor company. The deal was blocked after ownership links were uncovered.

• In 2022, the United Kingdom forced divestment of a sensitive semiconductor firm acquired through a Dutch entity, which had supplied chips used in consumer electronics but potentially adaptable for military systems.

• AidData found that after China’s “Made in China 2025” initiative, cross-border acquisitions targeting sensitive sectors increased from 46% to 88% of state lending activities.

These patterns illustrate the deliberate alignment of financial activity with Beijing’s industrial and technological objectives.

Tracking Chinese State Lending

AidData’s researchers analyzed filings, contracts, and disclosures across more than 200 countries, revealing previously unreported loans in developed economies. The team traced financing hidden behind shell companies and intermediaries, uncovering a shift from traditional development aid toward geoeconomic leverage.

Brad Setser emphasized that understanding these flows is critical for global economic security. “It’s important that we understand what they’re doing, and they don’t make it easy,” he said.

Strategic Implications for the United States

The report underscores a paradox: the U.S., while warning other nations of China’s predatory state lending, has itself received the largest volume of financing. Analysts caution that this could give Beijing long-term leverage over key sectors of the American economy, potentially affecting defense, technology, and critical infrastructure.

Heightened awareness, regulatory oversight, and strategic international coordination are essential to mitigate potential security risks while managing global investment flows.

Outlook and Policy Considerations

As U.S.–China competition intensifies across technology, trade, and geopolitics, the findings highlight the need for comprehensive monitoring of foreign investments. Transparency in cross-border lending, careful review of strategic acquisitions, and enhanced interagency coordination will be critical to balancing economic growth with national security.

The AidData report suggests a future in which state-directed finance serves as a tool of geoeconomic influence, shaping global access to technology and strategic assets across multiple continents.

Source: AP News – US has warned others to avoid loans from Chinese state banks. But it’s the biggest recipient of all

The post U.S. Tops Global Recipients of Chinese State Bank Loans Despite Warnings appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Intel Corp. has reported a return to profitability, marking its first quarterly gain since the U.S. government became one of its major shareholders. The turnaround comes as the company undergoes deep restructuring under new leadership to reclaim its position in the fiercely competitive global semiconductor market.

Intel’s Financial Recovery

In its latest quarterly results, Intel announced a net income of $4.1 billion, or 90 cents per share, for the three months ending in September. That marks a sharp reversal from the $17 billion loss the company recorded a year earlier.

Revenue rose 3% year over year to $13.7 billion, signaling modest growth after several challenging quarters. The company’s stock jumped nearly 8% in after-hours trading, reaching $41.10, extending gains since the U.S. government’s high-profile investment earlier this year.

Government Investment and Strategic Overhaul

Intel’s rebound follows a major shift in both leadership and financial structure. In August, President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. government would acquire a 10% stake in Intel as part of an effort to secure the domestic semiconductor supply chain — a move viewed as vital to national security and economic resilience.

The stake was issued in exchange for nearly $9 billion in funds Intel had already been granted under the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, legislation designed to revive U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and reduce reliance on Asian suppliers.

While such direct government investment in a private corporation is rare, especially under a Republican administration, the measure reflects Washington’s growing concern over the dominance of foreign chipmakers and China’s technological rise.

Restructuring Under New Leadership

Since taking over as CEO earlier this year, Lip-Bu Tan has undertaken a sweeping cost-cutting campaign, eliminating thousands of jobs and shelving underperforming projects to restore Intel’s financial health.

Tan, a veteran of the semiconductor industry, has emphasized streamlining operations and redirecting resources toward core chip design and manufacturing capabilities. The company’s strategy also includes renewed focus on AI chip development and next-generation fabrication facilities in the U.S. and Europe.

Intel’s turnaround strategy comes amid intensifying competition from Nvidia, AMD, and TSMC, all of which have surged ahead in high-performance and artificial intelligence chip production.

Industry Partnerships and Funding Boosts

In addition to U.S. government support, Intel has attracted new private investment to stabilize its finances. The company received $5 billion from Nvidia in September and another $2 billion from Japan’s SoftBank earlier this year. These partnerships, analysts say, may help Intel accelerate its transition into new technologies and strengthen its supply chain partnerships.

Founded in 1968, Intel was once the undisputed leader of the personal computing era. But the company’s dominance began to erode after it missed the mobile revolution that followed Apple’s launch of the iPhone in 2007.

Now, with artificial intelligence transforming the technology landscape, Intel faces its greatest challenge yet — catching up in a sector where Nvidia’s graphics processing units (GPUs) have become indispensable for AI training and data centers.

Looking Ahead

Analysts view Intel’s latest results as an encouraging sign but caution that recovery remains fragile. The company must still demonstrate consistent growth and technological innovation to regain investor confidence and market share.

The U.S. government’s ownership stake adds both opportunity and scrutiny, tying Intel’s performance to broader national policy goals in advanced manufacturing and technology independence.

For now, investors appear optimistic. As Intel works to rebuild its competitive edge in the AI-driven semiconductor era, its return to profitability marks an early milestone in a long-term comeback effort.

Source: AP News – Intel posts profit even as it struggles to regain market share

The post Intel Returns to Profit Amid U.S. Government Investment and Restructuring appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

President Donald Trump has announced what he calls a new partnership between U.S. Steel and Japanese steel giant Nippon Steel — a move he says will keep the company’s headquarters in Pittsburgh and inject $14 billion into the U.S. economy.

Posting on TruthSocial Friday, Trump highlighted the potential benefits:

“This will be a planned partnership between United States Steel and Nippon Steel, which will create at least 70,000 jobs, and add $14 Billion Dollars to the U.S. Economy. The bulk of that investment will occur in the next 14 months.”

Trump also said he will visit a steel plant next Friday for a “BIG rally” related to the deal.

What We Know — and What We Don’t

Details about the deal remain scarce. It’s unclear if this is a true partnership or more of an acquisition, and how much control U.S. Steel will retain. The deal comes after former President Joe Biden blocked a $14.3 billion acquisition in his final week in office, amid bipartisan concerns over foreign ownership of a cornerstone of U.S. industry.

Back in December 2023, when the acquisition was first proposed, both parties in Washington opposed foreign control of U.S. Steel — a symbol of American industrial strength for over a century.

Trump himself opposed outright foreign ownership during his first term, stating:

“I don’t want US Steel being owned by a foreign country. All they can have is an investment.”

However, the Trump administration took a softer stance this year, signaling possible approval after filing motions related to the ongoing legal battle between U.S. Steel, Nippon Steel, and the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment (CFIUS). This committee reviews foreign deals that might affect national security.

Investment, Jobs, and National Security

Nippon Steel raised its investment offer to $14 billion, including plans for a new $4 billion steel mill in the U.S., should the deal gain approval. According to Reuters, CFIUS recently made a recommendation to Trump regarding whether the companies’ proposed safeguards could address national security concerns.

Once the world’s largest steelmaker, U.S. Steel has seen a steady decline since its post-World War II peak. Today, it employs around 14,000 Americans—11,000 of whom belong to the United Steelworkers union—and is no longer the country’s biggest steel producer.

Still, its ownership remains a sensitive issue, especially in Pennsylvania, a key political state where many see U.S. Steel as a symbol of American manufacturing might.

Reactions from Leadership and Labor

U.S. Steel praised Trump as “a bold leader and businessman,” emphasizing that the company will “remain American” and grow stronger through the partnership with Nippon Steel. The company highlighted the promise of massive investment, new technology, and thousands of jobs over the next four years.

Yet, the union response has been sharply critical. The United Steelworkers warned the deal could be disastrous for American steelworkers, national security, and the future of manufacturing. In a recent statement, the union urged Trump to block the sale once and for all, calling the deal a “corporate sellout.”

Pennsylvania’s political leaders are divided: Republican Senator Dave McCormick applauded the partnership, saying it keeps U.S. Steel under American control, while Democratic Senator John Fetterman called the original deal a “death sentence” for local steelworkers.

Governor Josh Shapiro praised the deal, noting his recent discussions with Trump and emphasizing his focus on preserving and growing jobs in Pennsylvania.

“My priority has been to keep and grow jobs here in Pennsylvania and get the largest investment we possibly could for our Commonwealth,” Shapiro said.

Market Reaction and Next Steps

Following the announcement, U.S. Steel’s stock surged 21% on Friday. The outcome of this deal still depends on regulatory approval and further negotiations, with many questions remaining about how the partnership will function in practice.

Source: CNN – President Trump says Nippon Steel and US Steel to enter into ‘partnership’

The post Trump Announces $14 Billion US Steel and Nippon Steel Partnership appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

After weeks of tense negotiations and delays, Ukraine is set to sign a long-anticipated mineral resources deal with the United States as early as Wednesday, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The agreement, which has been in the works since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, is expected to establish a joint investment fund granting U.S. access to Ukraine’s vast untapped mineral reserves. In return, Washington will inject fresh investments into Ukraine’s recovery and development efforts.

Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal confirmed that the country’s economy minister, Yulia Svyrydenko, is en route to Washington to finalize the agreement. Speaking on Ukrainian television, Shmyhal said, “We are finalizing the last details with our American colleagues. I hope the agreement will be signed within the next 24 hours.”

If completed, the deal would mark a pivotal step in U.S.-Ukraine cooperation at a time when both security concerns and economic resilience are high on Kyiv’s agenda.

The path to this deal hasn’t been smooth. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was initially expected to ink the agreement during a February trip to Washington. However, that visit was cut short after a tense Oval Office meeting with Trump, leaving the deal unsigned.

At the center of the dispute were disagreements over security guarantees. Trump reportedly insisted on delaying any commitments on security until after Ukraine signed the agreement. At one point, Zelensky criticized the deal’s terms, saying it felt like he was being asked to “sell” his country.

Not long after that failed meeting, Trump temporarily froze U.S. aid to Ukraine—sending shockwaves through Europe and prompting renewed pledges of support from Kyiv’s European allies. Although aid has since resumed, the episode left a lasting impact.

While full details haven’t been made public, Shmyhal has characterized the agreement as a “strategic” and “equal” partnership. The U.S. and Ukraine will establish a jointly managed investment fund, with both countries contributing equally. According to Shmyhal, new U.S. military aid may also be counted as a contribution to the fund.

He also clarified that the deal will not retroactively include previous U.S. assistance. Instead, it is focused on fostering future collaboration, especially around rebuilding Ukraine’s economy and infrastructure.

Ukraine holds significant reserves of critical minerals—22 out of the 50 deemed essential by the U.S. Geological Survey. These include rare earth elements vital for electronics, green energy technologies, and defense systems.

Western nations, eager to reduce their dependency on China for these materials, have increasingly looked to Ukraine as a potential alternative source. The Biden administration had already laid the groundwork for this through a memorandum of understanding that encouraged U.S. investment in Ukraine’s mining sector, provided Kyiv offered economic incentives and upheld environmental standards.

Ukraine already has a similar agreement in place with the European Union, signed in 2021.

The signing of this U.S.-Ukraine mineral agreement—expected to happen Wednesday—could signal a new phase in the partnership between Washington and Kyiv, balancing economic opportunity with strategic security.

This story is still developing.

Source: CNN – Ukraine expects to sign long-awaited US mineral deal Wednesday, source says

The post U.S.-Ukraine Agreement Could Unlock Billions in Mineral Investment appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.