The concerns come as the United States begins winding down funding provided through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a program that has played a central role in South Africa’s response to HIV and AIDS for two decades.

According to the U.S. State Department, the drawdown of most PEPFAR-supported programs is expected to be completed by the end of September, while support for certain critical personnel will continue until March next year.

The transition marks a significant change for South Africa, which has the world’s largest HIV-positive population, with approximately 8 million people living with the virus.

Prevention Programs Among Hardest Hit

Health advocates and civil society groups say prevention services have experienced some of the most immediate disruptions since U.S. funding reductions began.

According to Section27, a South African public interest organization that assessed conditions in several high HIV-prevalence districts, healthcare systems have focused on preserving treatment programs while scaling back preventive services.

Tendai Mafuma, a senior legal researcher at Section27, said maintaining treatment continuity became a priority as funding pressures intensified, leaving prevention initiatives particularly vulnerable.

Programs designed to reduce new infections among young people and at-risk communities have reportedly faced significant challenges as financial support declines.

Job Losses and Service Reductions Reported

The funding changes have also affected organizations that previously relied on PEPFAR support.

The Anova Health Institute said it has discontinued programs financed through the initiative and has laid off approximately 3,000 healthcare workers since last year.

Dr. Kate Rees, a public health medicine specialist at Anova, said community-based delivery of preexposure prophylaxis, commonly known as PrEP, and other prevention services had been heavily affected.

She noted that outreach programs are often essential for reaching populations that face barriers to accessing traditional healthcare services.

According to Rees, children, adolescents and young adults are among those most affected by the reductions. Other vulnerable groups include men who have sex with men and people who use drugs.

Aid Withdrawal Linked to Broader U.S.-South Africa Dispute

The reduction in HIV-related assistance follows broader U.S. decisions regarding financial support for South Africa.

President Donald Trump announced a suspension of aid to the country in early 2025, citing a range of political concerns.

Among the issues raised by the administration were South Africa’s Black Economic Empowerment policies, land expropriation legislation and the government’s case against Israel before the International Court of Justice.

The administration also expressed concerns regarding public statements and political rhetoric related to the controversial anti-apartheid song “Kill the Boer,” which some interpret as encouraging violence against members of the Afrikaner community.

A U.S. State Department spokesperson told The Associated Press that South African officials had been informed that continued PEPFAR support was tied to addressing several of these concerns.

Government Pursues Self-Reliance Strategy

South African health authorities say preparations for a potential withdrawal of U.S. funding began after the suspension of foreign assistance and the cancellation of certain USAID grants in January 2025.

Health Department spokesperson Foster Mohale said the government has been developing a self-reliance strategy intended to reduce the impact of funding reductions.

According to the government, PEPFAR funding accounted for roughly 17% of South Africa’s HIV program budget. Most antiretroviral medication purchases are financed domestically, while additional support comes from the Global Fund.

Last year, South Africa announced an emergency fund valued at approximately $45 million to help address gaps resulting from the reduction in external assistance.

Long-Term Concerns Remain

PEPFAR has been widely credited with supporting HIV treatment and prevention efforts across Africa and other regions over the past two decades, contributing to substantial reductions in HIV-related deaths and expanding access to lifesaving medication.

While South African officials emphasize that treatment programs remain operational, civil society organizations warn that diminished prevention efforts could have long-term consequences for public health.

Advocates argue that maintaining outreach services for vulnerable communities will be essential if the country hopes to sustain progress in reducing new HIV infections and preserving gains achieved through years of international and domestic investment.

Tags: South Africa, HIV/AIDS, PEPFAR, Donald Trump, U.S. Foreign Aid, Public Health, USAID, Global Fund, Healthcare Funding, Johannesburg, HIV Prevention, Africa Health

The post South African Groups Warn HIV Prevention Efforts Face Setbacks as U.S. Funding Ends appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The Trump administration has abruptly ended funding to the U.N. World Food Program (WFP), halting crucial emergency food aid for millions of people across Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and several other impoverished nations, according to officials and reports from The Associated Press. The cuts, targeting some of the most vulnerable populations on the planet, have drawn immediate criticism from humanitarian organizations, with the WFP calling the decision a “death sentence” for millions facing starvation.

In a social media post, the WFP expressed alarm over the unexpected cuts, which they say threaten lives across conflict-ridden regions. The program had been a critical lifeline, providing food, water, medical care, and other essentials to millions of people.

“This could amount to a death sentence for millions of people facing extreme hunger and starvation,” the WFP warned on X (formerly Twitter).

The cuts came as a shock, especially after promises from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other U.S. officials to protect emergency food programs from severe reductions in foreign assistance. However, recent decisions have contradicted these pledges, leaving critical programs suspended or canceled entirely.

Among the most affected countries are those already suffering from years of war and poverty, including Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan. In Syria, where a brutal civil war has raged for over a decade, $230 million worth of contracts with WFP and humanitarian partners have been abruptly canceled. The largest of these programs, worth $111 million, provided essential daily bread and other foods to 1.5 million people in Syria.

Meanwhile, in Yemen, which is experiencing one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises, all U.S. aid to WFP food programs has been halted. The impact is expected to be devastating, especially for the many children and families already living in extreme poverty.

Other countries also severely affected by the cuts include Lebanon, Jordan, Somalia, Zimbabwe, and Afghanistan. In Afghanistan, $560 million in humanitarian aid has been slashed, including support for malnourished children, medical care, and safe drinking water.

One particularly tragic consequence of the funding cuts is the suspension of a program designed to help young Afghan women continue their education abroad, as the Taliban prohibits women from attending school. These women now face the horrifying prospect of being sent back to Afghanistan, where their safety is at great risk.

The WFP has long relied on U.S. funding, which accounted for $4.5 billion of the $9.8 billion donated to the agency last year. The U.S. has been a key partner in alleviating hunger and supporting stability in some of the world’s most volatile regions. Now, with emergency food programs across the globe in jeopardy, the impact of these cuts could be devastating.

Cindy McCain, the head of WFP, expressed deep concern about the global consequences, warning that the cuts could “undermine global stability” by exacerbating hunger and fueling conflict.

The Trump administration’s decision to pull funding for critical programs has sparked widespread condemnation, not only from humanitarian organizations but also from political figures. Marco Rubio had previously assured Congress and the public that emergency programs would be spared from cuts. However, these recent actions have contradicted those assurances, leaving millions of vulnerable people without support.

As some programs are shut down, concerns are also rising about the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria, which houses tens of thousands of alleged Islamic State fighters and their families. The temporary shutdown of services at this camp caused fears of unrest and potential breakouts, but U.S. officials quickly stepped in to restore some operations.

Experts warn that the sudden termination of these aid programs will only worsen the already dire humanitarian crises in these countries. Many people in these regions rely on food aid for survival, and without it, millions could face starvation.

For many, this decision is not just a policy shift — it’s a matter of life and death. Save the Children and other aid groups are urging the U.S. to reconsider, emphasizing the importance of continuing support for these life-saving programs, which also serve to stabilize regions and reduce the risks of mass migration and extremism.

As the world watches, the impact of these cuts will be felt by millions already struggling to survive in some of the most dangerous and impoverished regions of the world. The question now is whether the U.S. will reconsider its stance, or if these cuts will become a permanent part of the Trump administration’s foreign aid policy.

Source: AP News – US ends life-saving food aid for millions. The World Food program calls it a ‘death sentence’

The post Trump Administration Cuts Vital Food Aid for Millions in Crisis appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

White House Meeting as Trump Pushes Controversial Middle East Strategy

President Donald Trump will host Jordan’s King Abdullah II at the White House on Tuesday as he intensifies pressure on Jordan to accept refugees from Gaza—potentially on a permanent basis. The meeting comes as part of Trump’s broader, ambitious vision to reshape the Middle East.

The visit coincides with growing tensions over the fragile ceasefire in Gaza. Hamas, accusing Israel of violating the truce, has announced a pause in hostage releases. Meanwhile, Trump has urged Israel to resume military action if remaining hostages are not freed by the weekend.

Trump’s Vision: U.S. Control Over Gaza and Regional Resettlement

Trump has proposed that the U.S. take control of Gaza and transform it into “the Riviera of the Middle East.” Under his plan, Palestinians in the war-ravaged territory would be relocated to neighboring countries, with no right to return.

On Monday, Trump suggested he might use financial leverage to push Jordan and Egypt—both longtime U.S. allies and top recipients of American foreign aid—into accepting displaced Palestinians.

“Yeah, maybe. Sure, why not?” Trump told reporters when asked if he would withhold aid. “If they don’t, I would conceivably withhold aid, yes.”

However, Jordan has firmly rejected the proposal. The country, already home to more than two million Palestinians, has repeatedly voiced opposition to any forced resettlement.

Jordan and Egypt Firmly Oppose Resettlement Plan

Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi reaffirmed last week that his country’s stance remains “firm and unwavering.” Like Jordan, Egypt has also expressed strong concerns about security risks associated with absorbing large numbers of refugees, even on a temporary basis.

When pressed on how he planned to convince King Abdullah to accept Palestinians, Trump responded optimistically:

“I do think he’ll take, and I think other countries will take also. They have good hearts.”

High-Stakes Talks with Trump Administration Officials

During his visit, King Abdullah is set to meet with top Trump administration officials, including:

• Secretary of State Marco Rubio
• National Security Adviser Mike Waltz
• Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff
• Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

He is the third foreign leader to meet with Trump in person since the president’s inauguration on January 20.

Trump’s Bold Strategy Faces Scrutiny

Trump first introduced his plan for Gaza during a press conference last week alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. While initially open to deploying U.S. troops for security, Trump ruled out using American funds for Gaza’s reconstruction, raising questions about the feasibility of his vision.

Following Trump’s remarks, Rubio and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt clarified that the president’s intent was for Palestinians to be relocated “temporarily.” They emphasized an “interim” phase focused on clearing debris, removing unexploded ordnance, and rebuilding key infrastructure.

However, in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier on Monday, Trump gave a blunt answer when asked if Palestinians in Gaza would have a right to return:

“No, they wouldn’t.”

What’s Next?

With King Abdullah standing firm against Trump’s plan, the White House meeting is expected to be tense. The coming days will determine whether Trump’s strategy gains traction—or faces continued resistance from Arab allies.

Source

The post Trump Pressures Jordan’s King to Accept Gaza Refugees appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

U.S. Cuts Assistance, Citing Discrimination Against White Farmers

U.S. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order halting financial assistance to South Africa, citing concerns over a controversial land expropriation law and the country’s stance against Israel in the ongoing Gaza conflict.

The order, signed Friday, instructs U.S. agencies to freeze all aid unless deemed essential. Trump claims the South African government is violating human rights by allowing the seizure of farmland from White farmers without compensation.

“The United States shall not provide aid or assistance to South Africa as long as these unjust and immoral practices continue.” – Executive Order

South Africa Denies Land Confiscation Allegations

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has previously denied that the government is confiscating land. He insists that land reforms are aimed at addressing historical injustices from the apartheid era.

The South African government responded with strong criticism, calling Trump’s order a “campaign of misinformation.”

“This order lacks factual accuracy and fails to recognize South Africa’s painful history of colonialism and apartheid.” – South Africa’s Foreign Ministry

The ministry also accused the U.S. of hypocrisy:

“It is ironic that the U.S. offers refugee status to a privileged group while deporting vulnerable people from other parts of the world.”

Trump Orders Support for Afrikaner Refugees

Trump’s executive order also directs the U.S. government to assist Afrikaners—a White South African ethnic group—who wish to leave the country due to what he calls “race-based discrimination.”

The order states that the U.S. will help Afrikaner refugees resettle under special programs, citing racially discriminatory property confiscation as justification.

The Land Reform Debate in South Africa

Under apartheid, Black South Africans were forcibly removed from their land, which was handed over to White settlers.

Land redistribution has been a priority since 1994, when South Africa became a democracy.

In January 2024, Ramaphosa signed a new land expropriation bill, allowing the government to seize land without compensation in certain cases.

Despite reforms, Black South Africans (80% of the population) own only a fraction of the land, while unemployment and poverty remain major challenges.

U.S. Aid to South Africa: What’s at Stake?

According to the U.S. Foreign Assistance website, the U.S. allocated nearly $440 million in aid to South Africa in 2023, including $270 million from USAID.

However, the Trump administration has been cutting back on foreign assistance and has already taken steps to dismantle USAID.

Trump Cites South Africa’s Stance on Israel

Beyond the land reform issue, Trump’s order also targets South Africa’s “aggressive stance” against Israel.

South Africa filed a case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza.

The South African government claimed Israel was “intent on destroying Palestinians” and demanded a halt to its military campaign.

Trump argues that South Africa’s position harms U.S. interests and its allies, including Israel.

Ramaphosa Stands Firm: ‘We Will Not Be Bullied’

In response to Trump’s order, Ramaphosa held a phone call with South African-born billionaire Elon Musk to address “misinformation and distortions” about the country.

During his annual State of the Nation Address, Ramaphosa sent a clear message:

“We are a resilient people, and we will not be bullied.”

Conclusion

Trump’s decision to freeze aid to South Africa escalates tensions between the two nations. The U.S. cites land expropriation and South Africa’s opposition to Israel as reasons, while South African leaders accuse Trump of misrepresenting facts and interfering in domestic affairs.

As the dispute unfolds, the future of U.S.-South Africa relations remains uncertain.

Source

The post Trump Halts U.S. Aid to South Africa Over Land Reform and Israel Stance appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.