Published: September-23-2025, 15:00 EDT

A Seattle-based seafood distributor has expanded its recall of shrimp products sold at Kroger-owned grocery stores nationwide due to concerns about possible radioactive contamination. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said the products may contain trace amounts of cesium 137, a radioactive isotope linked to nuclear activity. Officials stress the health risk is low, but the ongoing investigation highlights gaps in seafood import safety and monitoring.

Expanded Recall Covers 157,000 Pounds of Shrimp

Aquastar Corp. announced on Saturday that it is recalling nearly 157,000 additional pounds of cooked and frozen shrimp. The affected products were sold between June 12 and September 17 across more than 30 states under several Kroger-owned brands.

The recall includes:

• Kroger Raw Colossal EZ Peel Shrimp (nearly 50,000 bags)

• Kroger Mercado Cooked Medium Peeled Tail-Off Shrimp (about 18,000 bags)

• AquaStar Peeled Tail-On Shrimp Skewers (more than 17,000 bags)

The shrimp products were distributed to major grocery chains including Kroger, Fred Meyer, Ralph’s, Smith’s, King Soopers, Mariano’s, Pick ‘n Save, Dillons, and others.

Aquastar previously recalled shrimp in August as part of the same FDA investigation into contamination linked to imports from Indonesia.

FDA Links Contamination to Indonesian Supplier

The FDA confirmed that the shrimp under investigation was imported from PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati (BMS Foods), an Indonesian seafood processor. Earlier this year, FDA inspectors detected cesium 137 in shipping containers from the company and in a sample of frozen breaded shrimp.

Although the shrimp that directly tested positive was not released for sale, the agency warned that other shipments may have been exposed to contamination during production or transport. In response, the FDA issued an import alert in August to block potentially unsafe shrimp from entering the U.S.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection records show that more than 3 million pounds of shrimp from BMS Foods entered U.S. ports in September, underscoring the scale of the issue.

What Is Cesium 137 and Why It Matters

Cesium 137 is a byproduct of nuclear fission and is commonly released from nuclear reactors and weapons testing. The isotope can contaminate soil, water, or industrial environments when radioactive waste is mishandled.

Health experts note that short-term exposure to small amounts of cesium 137 is unlikely to cause immediate harm. However, prolonged consumption of contaminated food could increase risks of cancer and other illnesses.

The FDA said that testing revealed levels of about 68 becquerels per kilogram in the shrimp, well below its safety threshold of 1,200 becquerels per kilogram. Still, the agency emphasized caution, stating the shrimp could pose a “potential health concern” if consumed over extended periods.

Possible Source: Contaminated Industrial Metal

Investigators believe the contamination may stem from conditions at or near the Indonesian shrimp processor’s facility. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), evidence suggests exposure could have come from radioactive scrap metal or activities at a nearby smelting plant.

So far, U.S. officials have declined to answer detailed questions from the Associated Press about the source or full scope of the contamination. The uncertainty has fueled calls from consumer groups for greater transparency and tighter regulation of seafood imports.

Regulatory and Industry Response

The FDA continues to monitor shipments from BMS Foods and other suppliers while testing imported seafood for potential contamination. Import alerts remain in place to prevent additional affected products from reaching U.S. grocery shelves.

Kroger and Aquastar both issued public statements emphasizing their cooperation with federal regulators. The companies urged customers who purchased recalled shrimp to return it for a full refund and avoid consumption.

Food safety experts stressed that while the health risk appears minimal, quick action is essential to maintain consumer trust. “Even at low levels, radioactive contamination in food must be taken seriously,” said Dr. Alan Rosen, a professor of environmental health at the University of Washington. “The public deserves clear communication about the risks and the steps being taken to ensure safety.”

Consumer Impact Across the U.S.

The recall affects shoppers in more than 30 states where Kroger operates under multiple store banners. Consumers have been advised to check packaging details carefully and discard or return any affected shrimp.

The incident has also raised questions about supply chain oversight, given the volume of seafood imported annually from Southeast Asia. The U.S. imports more than 90 percent of its seafood, and shrimp remains the single most consumed variety.

Looking Ahead: Food Safety in Global Trade

This case highlights broader challenges in regulating global food supply chains. Experts say contamination events—whether involving bacteria, chemicals, or radioactive materials—underscore the need for stronger international cooperation and inspection systems.

For now, regulators continue to investigate the Indonesian facility, while the FDA maintains its import alert on shrimp products from BMS Foods. Until the source of contamination is fully identified, food safety advocates recommend ongoing testing and stricter monitoring of imported seafood products.

Source: AP News –More shrimp sold at Kroger stores recalled for possible radioactive contamination

The post Kroger Expands Shrimp Recall Over Potential Radioactive Contamination appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Introduction

In a significant decision, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned the use of Red Dye No. 3 (also known as erythrosine or FD&C Red No. 3) in foods, dietary supplements, and oral medicines. The move comes nearly 35 years after the dye was prohibited in cosmetics due to its potential cancer risks.

The Reason for the Ban

The FDA’s decision follows a 2022 petition filed by food safety and health advocates. The agency cited the Delaney Clause, a federal statute mandating the ban of any additive linked to cancer in humans or animals. Studies have shown that Red 3 caused cancer in lab rats exposed to high levels of the dye.

“The FDA is taking action to remove the authorization for FD&C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs,” said Jim Jones, FDA’s deputy commissioner for human foods.

While the way Red 3 causes cancer in rats does not occur in humans, the FDA determined it was legally obligated to act based on existing evidence.

Transition Timeline for Manufacturers

The ban includes:

• Food Manufacturers: Required to remove Red 3 by January 2027.
• Ingested Drug Makers: Must comply by January 2028.

Imported foods must also adhere to the new U.S. requirements, though other countries still allow certain uses of the dye.

Consumer Advocates Celebrate the Move

Health and safety groups praised the FDA’s decision as a long-overdue step toward eliminating harmful substances from the food supply.

“This is a welcome, but long overdue, action from the FDA: removing the unsustainable double standard in which Red 3 was banned from lipstick but permitted in candy,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI).

The CSPI spearheaded the petition, emphasizing that the dye’s removal is especially crucial for protecting children, who consume higher amounts of the additive relative to their body weight.

Potential Legal Challenges

The ban may face legal hurdles from food manufacturers. FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf acknowledged this during a December 2022 hearing:

“When we do ban something, it will go to court. And if we don’t have the scientific evidence, we will lose in court.”

The FDA previously declined to revoke Red 3’s authorization for food in 1990, citing differences in how the dye affects rats and humans. This earlier decision has been a point of contention among health advocates and lawmakers.

Congress and Public Support

Nearly two dozen members of Congress pushed for the ban, stating it was vital to protect children and eliminate unnecessary carcinogens from the food supply. A November 2022 letter from lawmakers argued:

“The FDA should act quickly to protect the nation’s youth from this harmful dye, used simply to give food and drinks a bright red color. No aesthetic reason could justify the use of a carcinogen in our food supply.”

Public opinion aligns with this view. According to a recent AP-NORC poll, about two-thirds of Americans support restricting or reformulating processed foods to remove harmful additives like Red 3. Support is highest among:

• College-educated adults: 8 in 10 favor restrictions.
• Higher-income households: Roughly 7 in 10 support reformulation.

In contrast, only about half of adults with household incomes below $30,000 expressed support.

Looking Ahead

The FDA’s decision to ban Red Dye No. 3 marks a major milestone in food safety regulation, addressing long-standing concerns over its use. While the dye’s removal may face legal scrutiny, consumer advocates and lawmakers see it as a critical step toward ensuring healthier food options for all Americans.

Source

The post Red Dye No. 3 Removed from U.S. Food Supply After Decades of Debate appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.