After six weeks in a Manhattan courtroom last year for his criminal hush money trial, former President Donald Trump remained silent throughout the proceedings. However, during his sentencing on Friday, Trump broke his silence with a seven-minute speech, airing grievances about the criminal justice system and his conviction.

The Case Against Trump: A Recap

Trump had been convicted of falsifying business records as part of a scheme to influence the 2016 election. The case stemmed from the alleged payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who claimed to have had an affair with Trump in 2006, shortly after the birth of his son. Initially facing up to four years in prison, the president-elect used the sentencing hearing to voice his frustrations and defend his actions.

Trump’s Grievances and Political Deflection

Appearing virtually from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Trump proclaimed his innocence and decried the trial as politically motivated. He accused prosecutors of launching a “witch hunt,” criticized his former lawyer, and even drew comparisons to ongoing national crises, such as natural disasters, wars, and inflation.

Trump suggested that his November electoral victory served as a form of political acquittal, claiming that the public’s support in his landslide win was a rejection of the “weaponization of government.”

“The people of our country got to see this firsthand… they voted, and I won… getting the largest number of votes by far, of any Republican candidate in history,” Trump said, reaffirming his belief that the case had no merit.

Judge Merchan’s Unprecedented Ruling

Due to Trump’s election victory and the legal immunity granted to the office of the president, Judge Juan Merchan issued an “unconditional discharge” with no punishment, allowing Trump to appeal the verdict. While Merchan acknowledged that Trump’s presidential status limited his sentencing options, he emphasized that the conviction was not erased by Trump’s election. The judge stressed that Trump’s actions were a “premeditated and continuous deception,” as found by a jury of twelve New Yorkers.

Merchan also pointed out that, while presidential protections were vast, they did not extend to erasing a jury’s verdict. He had previously criticized Trump for his “disdain for the Third Branch of government,” though he refrained from making explicit comments during Friday’s hearing.

Prosecution’s Critique of Trump’s Actions

Assistant Manhattan DA Joshua Steinglass was more direct, arguing that Trump’s actions caused lasting damage to the public’s perception of the criminal justice system. He accused Trump of engaging in a coordinated campaign to undermine the justice system and noted that, according to a probation officer, Trump views himself as above the law and refuses to accept responsibility for his actions.

Steinglass highlighted that Trump had repeatedly attacked the trial, calling it a “corrupt sham” and threatening to retaliate against prosecutors. He accused the defendant of deliberately fostering disdain for the justice system to further his own political agenda.

The Court’s Recommendation for No Punishment

Despite Steinglass’s strong words, the Manhattan district attorney’s office recommended no punishment for Trump, agreeing with Judge Merchan’s reasoning. Steinglass emphasized that the American public had the right to a presidency free from pending court obligations, with the recommendation aligned with the idea that Trump should not face sentence-related burdens while assuming office again.

A Final Gesture from the Judge

As the hearing came to a close, Judge Merchan, acknowledging the gravity of the situation, offered a final, somewhat cordial remark: “Sir, I wish you Godspeed as you assume your second term in office. Thank you.”

With the sentencing completed, Trump’s criminal conviction remains in place, but his legal immunity as president-elect, coupled with his planned appeal, leaves the final chapter of this case still open.

Source

The post Trump Sentencing Finalizes Criminal Conviction Ahead of His Return to the White House appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a significant ruling on Thursday, the Supreme Court rejected President-elect Donald Trump’s emergency request to delay his sentencing in the New York hush money case, setting the stage for sentencing on Friday. The 5-4 decision ensures the proceeding will take place just days before Trump is inaugurated for his second term on January 20.

Split Decision by the Supreme Court

The court’s conservative bloc was divided. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh supported Trump’s request for a delay. However, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the three liberal justices to deny it.

In a brief statement, the court noted that Trump’s concerns about the impact of the sentencing could be addressed later through the appeals process. The court also stated that the burden on Trump’s responsibilities as President-elect was “relatively insubstantial,” given that no penalties or prison time are expected.

Sentencing Details

Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Trump’s trial, scheduled the sentencing for Friday at 9:30 a.m. Trump will appear virtually from Mar-a-Lago, according to a source familiar with the plans.

Although Trump was convicted in May of falsifying business records related to payments to his former attorney Michael Cohen, who reimbursed a $130,000 payment to adult-film star Stormy Daniels, Merchan has indicated that no penalties will be imposed.

Trump’s Legal Argument

Trump’s lawyers argued that the sentencing interferes with his transition to power and poses potential national security risks. They cited the Supreme Court’s July decision granting former presidents broad immunity for official actions, claiming that evidence presented during his trial violated this ruling.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg countered that these concerns could be addressed during the appeals process, emphasizing the public interest in proceeding with sentencing.

Case Background

Trump was convicted of falsifying business records over hush money payments made to prevent Daniels from speaking out about an alleged affair before the 2016 election. (Trump has denied the affair.)

In December, Judge Merchan rejected Trump’s argument that the case involved protected official actions from his presidency, ruling that the evidence was unrelated to his official conduct.

Supreme Court Jurisdiction and Ethical Concerns

The Supreme Court rarely intervenes in state criminal cases before state appeals are exhausted. Bragg argued that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider Trump’s emergency request, which he described as unsupported and without merit.

Meanwhile, controversy erupted after reports of a phone call between Justice Samuel Alito and Trump just days before the appeal was filed. Congressional Democrats, including Rep. Jamie Raskin, called for Alito to recuse himself, citing potential ethical conflicts.

Alito defended the call, stating that no matters related to the sentencing or Supreme Court decisions were discussed.

Looking Ahead

As the nation watches this unprecedented moment, Trump’s legal team is preparing for an appeal of his conviction while continuing to claim the case raises concerns of “great national importance.”

The Friday sentencing is expected to last less than an hour, with Trump participating virtually. Despite the legal and political drama, Judge Merchan has signaled that the hearing will conclude without imposing penalties.

Source

The post Supreme Court Allows Trump Sentencing to Proceed Before Inauguration appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.