Published Time: 09-20-2025, 19:45 EDT

Former President Donald Trump has signed a new proclamation dramatically altering the U.S. visa system for highly skilled workers and foreign investors. The policy imposes a $100,000 annual fee on H-1B visa applications and introduces a “gold card” visa program requiring a $1 million contribution as a potential pathway to citizenship.

The changes are expected to face immediate legal challenges, as critics argue Trump is exceeding presidential authority by bypassing Congress. If enforced, the measures would significantly raise costs for companies and individuals relying on U.S. visa programs created more than three decades ago.

Key Details of the Proclamation

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed that the annual H-1B visa fee will be set at $100,000. “All big companies are on board,” Lutnick told reporters, though major technology firms have not publicly endorsed the plan.

The H-1B visa, established in 1990, was designed to help U.S. companies hire skilled workers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields when qualified American workers were unavailable. Traditionally, salaries for H-1B recipients average far below those of senior-level U.S. employees, fueling concerns that the program suppresses wages.

Trump defended the move, insisting that the technology industry would benefit. “I think they’re going to be very happy,” he said Friday.

Tech Industry Reactions

Representatives for major technology companies, including Amazon, Apple, Google, and Meta, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Microsoft declined to provide a statement.

Despite Trump’s claim that the industry supports the policy, companies have long relied on the H-1B program to secure top global talent. In 2025, Amazon was the leading recipient of H-1B visas, followed by Tata Consultancy, Microsoft, Apple, and Google, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

California continues to employ the highest number of H-1B workers nationwide.

Impact on U.S. Training and Hiring

Lutnick emphasized that the new fee is designed to discourage companies from using the H-1B program for entry-level or trainee positions.
“So no longer will you put trainees on an H-1B visa,” Lutnick said. “If you’re going to train people, you’re going to train Americans. If you have a very sophisticated engineer and you want to bring them in, then you can pay $100,000 a year for your H-1B visa.”

Critics argue the policy could make it economically unfeasible for many companies to hire foreign workers, even in roles requiring advanced expertise.

Introduction of the “Gold Card” Visa

Alongside the H-1B changes, Trump introduced a new investor visa known as the “Trump Gold Card.” This visa requires a $1 million contribution, following vetting and processing fees, and offers a potential pathway to U.S. citizenship.

For corporations, the cost will be $2 million. Trump also unveiled a higher-tier “Trump Platinum Card,” priced at $5 million, which allows holders to spend up to 270 days annually in the U.S. without being subject to U.S. taxes on foreign income.

A previous version of the investor visa program was announced in February 2025, but the platinum card will now replace it. Applicants may join a waitlist, though the plan requires congressional approval.

Historical Context of H-1B Visas

The H-1B program was originally created by Congress in 1990 to fill labor shortages in specialized industries. The program currently caps visas at 85,000 per year, distributed through a lottery system.

Critics, including labor groups, have long argued that companies use the system to import cheaper foreign labor rather than hire qualified U.S. workers. Large consulting firms such as Wipro, Infosys, HCL Technologies, Tata Consultancy, IBM, and Cognizant are frequent sponsors, contracting employees to American companies seeking cost savings.

In recent years, USCIS has tightened oversight to address fraud, including duplicate applications designed to increase lottery odds. In 2024, applications dropped nearly 40% after the agency began enforcing a “one employee, one entry” rule.

Divided Views on Reform

Doug Rand, a former USCIS official under the Biden administration, criticized Trump’s proclamation as politically motivated.
“This isn’t real policy—it’s fan service for immigration restrictionists,” Rand said. “Trump gets his headlines, inflicts a jolt of panic, and doesn’t care whether this survives first contact with the courts.”

The AFL-CIO has previously called for replacing the H-1B lottery with a system that awards visas to employers offering the highest wages. During his first term, Trump supported a similar shift, arguing it would protect U.S. workers.

Legal and Political Outlook

Immigration experts expect the proclamation to face swift legal challenges. Because the visa programs were created by Congress, critics argue that only legislative action—not presidential proclamations—can impose such sweeping changes to fee structures and visa categories.

If courts allow the policy to proceed, the cost of securing foreign talent could rise dramatically, reshaping U.S. hiring practices across technology, engineering, and research sectors. For investors, the gold and platinum card programs may provide new opportunities, though they remain contingent on congressional approval.

Broader Implications for Immigration Policy

The new proclamation reflects Trump’s broader approach to immigration, which has emphasized restricting entry and tightening oversight of visa programs. His administration has previously pursued changes to asylum, refugee admissions, and family reunification policies.

The impact of these latest visa measures—whether implemented or struck down in court—will likely fuel ongoing debate over how the U.S. balances economic needs with immigration reform.

Conclusion

Trump’s decision to impose a $100,000 annual fee on H-1B visas and launch a $1 million “gold card” visa signals a major shift in U.S. immigration and labor policy. While supporters argue the changes will encourage companies to prioritize American workers, critics warn they could disrupt industries dependent on global talent and provoke lengthy legal battles.

The Supreme Court and Congress may ultimately determine whether these measures become lasting components of U.S. immigration policy or temporary flashpoints in a contentious political debate.

Source: AP News – Trump signs proclamation adding $100K annual fee for H-1B visa applications

The post Trump Signs Proclamation Imposing $100,000 Annual Fee on H-1B Visas and Introducing $1 Million “Gold Card” Visa appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Mario Guevara, a Spanish-language journalist known for his courageous coverage of immigration raids in the Atlanta area, now faces the threat of deportation after being arrested while covering a protest last weekend.

Guevara, who fled El Salvador two decades ago due to political persecution, has built a strong reputation and a large following as an independent reporter documenting immigration enforcement. On Saturday, he was broadcasting live on social media from a protest in DeKalb County—just outside Atlanta—when police arrested him.

Arrest Caught on Video: “I’m a Member of the Media”

The footage shows Guevara standing with other journalists on a sidewalk, filming police officers in riot gear as they moved through a parking lot. When officers approached, Guevara stepped into the street and identified himself as press, saying, “I’m a member of the media, officer.” At the time, he wore a bright red shirt under a vest clearly marked with “PRESS.”

Despite this, police detained him on charges including obstructing officers, unlawful assembly, and improperly entering a roadway. DeKalb County jail held Guevara, and although a judge granted him bond, he remained detained for an additional 48 hours due to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) hold.

Facing Potential Deportation Despite Pending Green Card

Guevara’s attorney, Giovanni Diaz, explained that while Guevara is not a legal permanent resident, he currently has authorization to live and work in the U.S. He also has an adult son who is a U.S. citizen and has a green card application pending.

“If ICE takes custody of Mario,” Diaz said, “he would face federal immigration court and potential deportation.” Diaz is confident Guevara has a strong case to remain in the country, but acknowledges the climate of heightened immigration enforcement under the Trump administration has increased concerns.

A Voice for the Immigrant Community

Mario Guevara fled El Salvador in 2004 with his family after enduring harassment and violence because of his work as a political reporter for La Prensa Gráfica. Settling in Georgia, he worked for Mundo Hispánico, the state’s largest Spanish-language newspaper, before launching his own independent news site, MGNews.

Guevara’s fearless coverage—often streamed live with help from a network of community tipsters—has earned him over 780,000 followers on Facebook. His work has brought crucial visibility to immigration raids and enforcement actions that affect thousands in the area.

Arrest Raises Concerns Over Press Freedom

Saturday’s protest in DeKalb County was one of many across the U.S. responding to the Trump administration’s immigration policies. Authorities said police responded to crowds marching toward an interstate onramp, deploying tear gas and making several arrests.

News outlets, including The Associated Press, photographed Guevara at the scene. Yet, the video leading up to his arrest shows him calmly standing away from the crowds and police vehicles, not engaged in any confrontational behavior.

Diaz emphasized Guevara’s long history of working openly and transparently with law enforcement and local authorities.

“He’s been documenting immigration enforcement for over 20 years. He’s well known to the authorities. The fact that he’s detained now is deeply concerning. He’s a member of the press and doesn’t appear to have committed any crime,” Diaz said.

Source: AP News – Spanish-language journalist who documents immigration raids detained for ICE after protest arrest

The post Spanish-Language Reporter’s Arrest Raises Concerns Over Press Freedom and Deportation appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

As immigration protests in Los Angeles stretch into a fourth day, tensions continue to rise—with the Pentagon now sending in 700 Marines to help protect federal property and personnel. The decision, made in response to mounting unrest, has sparked controversy among local leaders and raised serious questions about communication, legality, and coordination.

Why the Marines Are in LA

According to U.S. Northern Command, the Marines are being deployed to support local law enforcement and the National Guard by protecting federal buildings and immigration officers. However, under the Posse Comitatus Act, the troops are prohibited from directly performing law enforcement duties such as making arrests or crowd control.

The Pentagon is drafting clear rules for their conduct, including prohibitions on warning shots and specific instructions on de-escalation and self-defense. Each Marine will reportedly receive a card outlining what they can and cannot do.

LAPD Chief Voices Concerns Over Lack of Coordination

Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell expressed frustration over being kept out of the loop. In a public statement, McDonnell said the LAPD received no formal notification about the Marines’ arrival and warned that their deployment, without close coordination, could lead to confusion and operational issues.

“We are urging open and continuous lines of communication between all agencies to prevent confusion, avoid escalation, and ensure a coordinated, lawful, and orderly response,” he said.

Protests Turn Chaotic: Dozens Arrested, Officers Injured

The protests have grown increasingly volatile. Over the weekend, LAPD arrested 29 people Saturday night for failure to disperse, and another 21 on Sunday for more serious offenses—including attempted murder involving a Molotov cocktail, assaulting officers, and looting.

The police used more than 600 rubber bullets, tear gas, and other less-lethal munitions during the demonstrations. Five officers reportedly sustained minor injuries.

State Pushback: California Files Lawsuit, Newsom Responds to Trump Threats

California is pushing back hard. Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the state is suing the Trump administration over its use of federal troops, accusing it of trampling on state sovereignty.

Meanwhile, a tense war of words erupted between Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump, backing comments made by his border enforcement czar Tom Homan, said officials obstructing immigration enforcement should be arrested. Newsom fired back defiantly: “Come after me, arrest me. Let’s just get it over with, tough guy.”

Pentagon Caught Off Guard by Hegseth’s Tweet

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s decision to deploy the Marines followed private conversations with Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs. But when Hegseth announced the move on his personal social media account, it surprised many inside the Pentagon. Officials say internal discussions are still ongoing about the full implications of the deployment.

Labor Leader David Huerta Released from Federal Custody

Among those arrested in recent days was labor leader David Huerta. After being released from federal detention, Huerta told reporters that his arrest wasn’t planned.

“This fight is ours, it’s our community’s, but it belongs to everyone,” he said outside the courthouse, urging peaceful protest. “Violence is not the answer.”

Sen. Schiff: Federal Troop Deployment Is Fueling the Fire

California Senator Adam Schiff, who attended Huerta’s bond hearing, criticized the Trump administration’s decision to bring in federal troops. He described the move as “utterly unnecessary and unwarranted” and said it was escalating tensions rather than helping resolve the crisis.

“We need to just focus on getting things calmed down here in Los Angeles so people can go about their business,” Schiff said. He called for peaceful protest and urged the administration to prioritize deportation efforts against violent offenders.

Protests Continue—With Moments of Unity and Celebration

Despite the turmoil, parts of downtown LA saw more upbeat scenes. In the El Pueblo district near the federal detention center, demonstrators danced to live music, waved Mexican flags, and chanted, “Whose streets? Our streets.”

The area, known for its vibrant celebration of Mexican culture, offered a moment of unity and peaceful expression amid an otherwise tense situation.

Stay tuned for developing story

Source: AP News – Live updates: Marines have been deployed to LA in response to immigration protests

The post Marines Deployed to LA as Immigration Protests Escalate appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

As the Supreme Court prepared to hear arguments on whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to take effect, he made a striking claim on Truth Social: that the United States is the only country in the world that grants citizenship simply by being born on its soil.

This claim is false.

Back on January 20, the first day of his second term, Trump signed an executive order aimed at denying citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are here illegally or only temporarily. However, lower courts quickly blocked this order nationwide, and the administration is now appealing these decisions, challenging the authority of judges to issue such broad injunctions. Importantly, the Supreme Court has not yet ruled on whether the executive order itself is constitutional.

Let’s break down the facts.

Trump’s Claim vs. Reality

On Truth Social, Trump said:
“The United States of America is the only Country in the World that does this, for what reason, nobody knows.”

But the truth is quite different.

According to the CIA World Factbook and the Library of Congress, about 30 countries worldwide offer unconditional birthright citizenship, including Canada, Mexico, and many nations in Africa and Asia. The U.S. is far from unique in this regard.

“The statement is pretty obviously wrong,” says Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University and expert on constitutional law and migration rights. “Many countries have birthright citizenship, though in some of them the rules differ from those in the U.S.”

What Is Birthright Citizenship?

Birthright citizenship is based on the principle of jus soli — Latin for “right of the soil.” It means that anyone born within a country’s borders automatically gains citizenship, regardless of their parents’ immigration status.

This contrasts with jus sanguinis, or “right of blood,” where citizenship depends on the nationality of one’s parents or ancestors.

In the U.S., birthright citizenship is nearly unconditional. Children born on American soil are citizens, except for two narrow exceptions: children of foreign diplomats and children of enemy soldiers occupying the country during wartime. Historically, Native Americans were excluded until the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.

A Historical Foundation

Birthright citizenship was enshrined in the U.S. Constitution after the Civil War to guarantee citizenship for formerly enslaved people. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, states:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

This Citizenship Clause overturned the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision, which held that Black people — enslaved or free — could not be citizens. It was a monumental shift in American history, affirming citizenship rights regardless of race or parentage (with the limited exceptions noted).

Trump’s Executive Order Faces Legal Hurdles

Trump’s executive order attempts to restrict birthright citizenship in a way that conflicts with longstanding Supreme Court precedent, notably a decision from 1898 that confirmed the Citizenship Clause grants citizenship to all born on U.S. soil except in very specific, rare cases.

Currently, the Supreme Court is considering this case alongside other immigration-related appeals brought by the Trump administration.

What This Means

The U.S. is not unique in offering birthright citizenship — many countries around the world have similar policies. The ongoing legal battle will determine whether Trump’s effort to limit this constitutional right can move forward, but the claim that the U.S. stands alone on this issue is simply wrong.

As the debate unfolds, understanding the history and facts behind birthright citizenship helps cut through the political rhetoric and misinformation.

Source: AP News – FACT FOCUS: Trump claims the US is the only country with birthright citizenship. It’s not

The post Trump’s Claim That Only the U.S. Has Birthright Citizenship Is False appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a major immigration ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday allowed former President Donald Trump’s administration to suspend a humanitarian parole program that had granted temporary legal protections to over half a million migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.

This emergency decision marks the second time this month the high court has sided with Trump’s efforts to roll back protections for immigrants—an ironic twist given his ongoing criticism of the federal judiciary.

What the Ruling Means

With this ruling, the Trump administration can now move forward with plans to deport more than 530,000 migrants who had been allowed to live and work in the U.S. under the Biden-era policy. While the legal battle is far from over—the case continues in lower courts—this decision removes a major roadblock for the administration.

Immigration advocates warn the impact will be immediate and severe.

“I cannot overstate how devastating this is,” said Karen Tumlin, director of the Justice Action Center, which represents many of the affected migrants. “This ruling unleashes chaos not just for our clients, but for their families, workplaces, and communities.”

A Split Court—and a Sharp Dissent

The Supreme Court’s unsigned order did not include an explanation, which is typical of its emergency docket rulings. However, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson strongly dissented.

In a blistering opinion, Jackson accused the majority of ignoring the human toll of the decision.

“The court undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens,” she wrote. “Apparently, it is now in the public’s interest to have the lives of these migrants unravel before their legal claims are even heard.”

What Was the Parole Program?

Parole has long been a tool in U.S. immigration policy, dating back to the Eisenhower administration. It allows the government to temporarily admit migrants for humanitarian reasons. Under Biden, the program was expanded in 2023 to cover migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela—provided they had U.S. sponsors, passed security checks, and entered the country legally.

The goal was to provide a safer, orderly alternative to unauthorized border crossings. But Trump moved swiftly to dismantle it on his first day back in office.

What’s at Stake Legally?

The legal dispute hinges on how much discretion the Department of Homeland Security has in ending parole protections. While federal law gives the DHS secretary broad power over parole decisions, immigrant advocates argue the government must evaluate each case individually—not cancel protections en masse.

A federal judge in Massachusetts agreed, temporarily blocking the Trump administration from ending the program without individualized reviews. That ruling was upheld by a federal appeals court in Boston earlier this month.

However, the Supreme Court’s new order overrides those decisions—at least for now.

Political and Legal Fallout

For the Trump administration, the court’s decision is a significant win.

“The migrants can now be deported because the Supreme Court justly stepped in and stopped these crazy lower court injunctions,” said Stephen Miller, Trump’s immigration architect and White House deputy chief of staff.

Legal experts warn the decision could increase pressure on the justices as they consider other high-stakes immigration cases, including one that asks whether the government can deport migrants to third countries without giving them a meaningful chance to challenge that removal.

“This decision raises the stakes,” said CNN legal analyst Steve Vladeck. “It underscores how much influence the Supreme Court has over the direction of immigration policy—even before the full legal issues are resolved.”

The Bigger Picture

The parole case is one of more than a dozen immigration-related emergency appeals that have reached the Supreme Court during Trump’s term. The justices are also weighing other hot-button issues, such as birthright citizenship and the scope of executive power in shaping immigration policy.

The implications of Friday’s ruling go far beyond the courtroom. For hundreds of thousands of families now facing the threat of deportation, the future has become even more uncertain.

Source: CNN – Supreme Court allows Trump to suspend deportation protections for immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela

The post Supreme Court Clears Way for Trump to End Deportation Protections for 500,000 Migrants appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Constellation Brands, the company behind popular beers Modelo and Corona, says it’s feeling the sting of President Trump’s hardline immigration policies — and it’s showing up in the sales numbers.

According to CEO William Newlands, Latino customers — who make up nearly half of Constellation’s U.S. consumer base — are pulling back from typical social activities, like dining out or attending gatherings. The reason? Growing fears of immigration raids and deportations under Trump’s administration.

“A lot of consumers in the Hispanic community are concerned right now,” Newlands said during a recent earnings call. “Social gatherings, an area where the Hispanic consumer often consumes beer, are declining today as part of these overarching concerns that they have.”

This shift in behavior contributed to a 1% drop in beer shipments last quarter. The dip was most evident in Hispanic neighborhoods, where store traffic has slowed significantly.

In a follow-up interview with The Wall Street Journal, Newlands explained that many Latino consumers are now avoiding local convenience stores and bodegas — typically go-to spots for beer purchases. Instead, they’re opting for larger retail chains where they feel safer blending into the crowd.

Constellation Brands isn’t the only company noticing a downturn among Hispanic consumers:

• Colgate-Palmolive, Foot Locker, Burlington, and Monster Beverage have all reported softer sales in recent weeks, particularly in Hispanic markets.
• John Faucher, VP at Colgate-Palmolive, acknowledged the shift, saying, “There obviously is an impact on Hispanic demand, as we’ve seen, lower traffic from Hispanic consumers.”

Data from market research firm Circana shows that Hispanic consumer spending on non-essentials has declined more sharply than that of non-Hispanic consumers this year.

Market analyst Nik Modi of RBC Capital Markets echoed the trend, noting in a recent client note:

“A consistent theme we have heard over the last several months has been mounting pressure among Hispanic consumers stemming from concerns on immigration policy. This has manifested in pullback from retail.”

Beyond the headlines, Trump’s immigration crackdown is adding yet another stressor to an already shaky economic environment for businesses. The administration’s use of aggressive enforcement tactics — even invoking wartime authority in some cases — has created a chilling effect on communities and commerce alike.

Source: CNN – Trump’s immigration crackdown is hurting Modelo and Corona sales, CEO says

The post Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Is Hurting Beer Sales, Says Modelo and Corona CEO appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

El Salvador’s controversial mega-prison, a symbol of President Nayib Bukele’s harsh anti-crime policies, has now become a tool in U.S. President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. On Sunday, hundreds of immigrants—alleged by the U.S. to be members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang—were transferred to the facility under a $6 million agreement between the two governments.

What is the CECOT?

The Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) was built at Bukele’s direction as part of his aggressive crackdown on gangs. Opened in 2023, the prison is located in Tecoluca, about 72 kilometers (45 miles) east of El Salvador’s capital.

CECOT is a massive facility with eight pavilions, capable of holding up to 40,000 inmates. Each cell is designed to fit between 65 to 70 prisoners. Unlike traditional prisons, CECOT does not allow visitations, outdoor recreation, or educational programs.

Prisoners at CECOT are not prepared for reintegration into society. Occasionally, a select few inmates—who have gained trust from prison officials—deliver motivational talks, with prisoners sitting in rows outside their cells or performing supervised exercises.

Bukele’s justice minister has stated that inmates at CECOT will never return to their communities. The prison’s amenities, including dining halls, break rooms, and a gym, are reserved exclusively for the guards.

How Many Prisoners Does El Salvador Hold?

The Salvadoran government does not frequently update incarceration figures. However, the human rights organization Cristosal reported that as of March 2024, El Salvador held approximately 110,000 people behind bars—more than double the 36,000 inmates recorded in April 2021 before Bukele intensified his anti-gang efforts.

Cristosal and other advocacy groups have raised concerns about human rights abuses. Reports indicate that at least 261 people have died in El Salvador’s prisons since the gang crackdown began. Allegations of abuse, torture, and lack of medical care have also been cited.

Government-released videos have shown CECOT prisoners in boxer shorts, forced to march in formation and sit shoulder-to-shoulder in overcrowded areas. Cells reportedly lack adequate bunks, leaving many inmates to sleep on the floor.

Why Were Immigrants Sent to CECOT?

The transfer of these immigrants to CECOT follows Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a law historically used only three times. The act grants the president extraordinary powers to detain or remove foreigners under wartime conditions. Trump argued that the Tren de Aragua gang was invading the U.S., justifying the deportations under wartime authority.

Tren de Aragua, a criminal organization that originated in Venezuela’s lawless prison system, expanded as millions of Venezuelans fled economic collapse. However, the Trump administration has not provided evidence that the deported migrants are actual gang members or that they committed crimes in the U.S.

El Salvador’s government released a video showing the immigrants arriving at an airport, escorted by officers in riot gear. Shackled at the hands and ankles, they were seen struggling to walk as officers forced them to bend at the waist. The footage later showed them being transported in a heavily guarded convoy to CECOT, where they were shaved, dressed in the prison’s all-white uniform, and placed into cells.

The Bigger Picture

El Salvador’s tough-on-crime approach has drawn both praise and criticism. While Bukele’s policies have significantly reduced gang-related violence, human rights organizations warn of potential abuses, mass incarcerations without due process, and inhumane prison conditions.

Trump’s decision to deport immigrants to CECOT raises further ethical and legal concerns. Critics argue that using such a facility for immigration enforcement—without clear evidence of criminal activity—sets a dangerous precedent. As the situation unfolds, the global community will be watching closely to see how both administrations handle the consequences of this unprecedented move.

Source: AP News – What to know about El Salvador’s mega-prison after Trump sent hundreds of immigrants there

The post Inside El Salvador’s Harsh Mega-Prison: What Happens to Trump’s Deported Immigrants? appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.