The U.S. trade deficit contracted sharply in August after a new round of tariffs reduced the volume of imported goods. The updated data, released following a federal government shutdown, shows that President Donald Trump’s tariff program has begun shifting trade behavior even as the broader deficit for 2025 continues to rise.

The Commerce Department report, delayed for more than seven weeks, shows imports falling more quickly than exports, temporarily narrowing the monthly deficit. Economists say the August figures offer a partial view of how trade policy affected the economy in the third quarter, though the full-year trend still points toward a wider gap.

U.S. Trade Deficit Shrinks in August as Tariffs Suppress Imports, Though Annual Gap Still Expands

The U.S. trade deficit dropped by nearly a quarter in August as new tariffs imposed by the Trump administration reduced the flow of imported goods. While the monthly gap narrowed, the overall 2025 deficit remains significantly higher than last year, reflecting ongoing volatility in global trade and domestic purchasing trends. Economists say the August data, though delayed, suggests that tariffs provided a temporary lift to third-quarter economic growth.

The Trade Deficit’s Sharp August Decline

The Commerce Department reported that the U.S. trade deficit decreased to $59.6 billion in August, down from $78.2 billion in July, marking one of the steepest month-to-month drops in recent years. The decline coincided with the rollout of tariffs covering a broad range of global goods.

Imports fell 5% to $340.4 billion, a notable reversal from July, when many U.S. companies rapidly increased inventories ahead of the tariff implementation. Those levies — affecting products from nearly every major trading partner — took effect on Aug. 7.

Exports rose 0.1% to $280.8 billion, driven by marginal gains in industrial supplies and agricultural products. While the increase was slight, it helped soften the impact of declining imports.

Economists note that trade flows often react sharply to major policy shifts, especially when companies stockpile goods in advance. The large July inventory buildup amplified the appearance of an August slowdown, but analysts say tariffs clearly reduced import volumes in the short term.

A Policy Shift That Redefined U.S. Trade Strategy

The August data reflects the broader impact of President Trump’s tariffs, which have replaced decades of largely liberalized U.S. trade policy. The administration has introduced double-digit tariffs on a wide range of imports, including metals, electronics, automobiles, and raw materials such as copper and steel.

The White House argues that persistent U.S. trade deficits highlight structural imbalances and unfair foreign practices. Administration officials say the tariffs are designed to strengthen domestic manufacturing and reduce dependence on overseas supply chains.

However, trade experts and international institutions, including the World Trade Organization (WTO), have warned that such sweeping unilateral measures often disrupt supply networks, increase costs for domestic businesses, and invite retaliatory actions from trading partners.

Annual Trade Balance Still Trending Higher

Despite August’s improvement, the U.S. trade deficit for the year remains significantly elevated. Between January and August, the deficit reached $713.6 billion, up 25% from $571.1 billion during the same period in 2024.

Economists attribute the widening annual gap to strong consumer spending, resilient demand for foreign goods, and supply chain adjustments that preceded the tariffs. As companies secured inventories earlier in the year, imports rose sharply before the August decline.

Analysts say the full-year deficit trajectory is shaped not just by policy but by broader economic cycles, noting that a growing economy typically pulls in more imports.

Impact on GDP and Third-Quarter Economic Growth

A narrower trade deficit supports U.S. economic growth because imports are subtracted from gross domestic product (GDP). With August’s decline in imports, some economists expect trade to contribute positively to third-quarter GDP.

Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank, said in a commentary that the updated data “will be a tailwind for third-quarter real GDP,” suggesting that domestic spending likely shifted toward U.S.-produced goods and services.

Although the figures arrive late due to the government shutdown, analysts say they align with other indicators showing firm economic momentum during the period.

Tariff Pressures and Their Influence on Inflation

Tariffs remain at the center of a national debate over inflation. Because tariffs are paid by U.S. importers, companies often pass the additional costs on to consumers. Many economists, including researchers at the Federal Reserve and major financial institutions, say these added costs have contributed to price pressures and slowed progress toward the Fed’s 2% inflation target.

Voter concerns over high living costs played a significant role in the Nov. 4 elections, where Democrats made sizable gains in Congress. Facing mounting political pressure, President Trump announced the removal of tariffs on several household-related goods last week, including beef, coffee, tea, fruit juice, cocoa, spices, bananas, tomatoes, oranges, and certain fertilizers.

The administration acknowledged that tariffs on these items “may, in some cases” have contributed to higher consumer prices, marking a rare policy reversal.

Legal Challenges Reach the Supreme Court

The scope of the president’s tariff authority is now before the U.S. Supreme Court. A coalition of businesses and trade groups has argued that the administration overstepped its constitutional and statutory powers by imposing broad tariffs under a national emergency declaration.

During a Nov. 5 hearing, several justices expressed skepticism about the extent of executive power claimed by the administration. Legal analysts say the Court’s eventual ruling could redefine the limits of presidential authority over trade policy, a domain traditionally shared with Congress.

A decision is expected to carry major implications for future trade actions, supply chain planning, and the global business environment.

A Complex Trade Environment for 2025

The August figures illustrate the volatility of the current trade landscape as the U.S. reshapes its global economic relationships. While tariffs have temporarily reduced imports and narrowed the monthly deficit, the broader annual trend remains upward due to earlier inventory cycles and consumer demand.

Economists say the coming months will determine whether the August shift reflects a lasting pattern or a temporary reaction to policy changes. Much will depend on global market conditions, international responses, and the outcome of the Supreme Court case that could reshape U.S. trade authority for years to come.

Source: AP News – U.S. trade deficit drops 24% in August as Trump’s tariffs reduce imports

The post U.S. Trade Deficit Falls in August as Tariffs Slow Imports appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Claim: President Donald Trump recently claimed the United States “subsidizes Canada to the tune of maybe $200 billion a year.”
Reality: That number doesn’t hold up to scrutiny — and calling it a “subsidy” misses the mark entirely.

What’s This About?

During a recent White House meeting with newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, President Trump revived a familiar talking point — that the U.S. is pouring money into Canada, allegedly in the form of military protection and trade imbalances.

“It’s hard to justify subsidizing Canada to the tune of maybe $200 billion a year,” Trump said. “We protect Canada militarily… But why are we subsidizing Canada $200 billion a year or whatever the number might be?”

So let’s unpack that. Does the U.S. actually give Canada anything close to $200 billion annually? Short answer: No. Not even close.

Where Did the Number Come From?

The White House says the $200 billion claim loosely stems from two things:

1. The U.S. trade deficit with Canada
2. U.S. military spending, particularly on NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command)

Let’s break these down.

The Trade Deficit ≠ Subsidy

According to U.S. government data:

• The 2024 trade deficit with Canada (goods and services combined) was about $35.7 billion.
• If you look only at goods, that number ranges higher — $63.3 billion to $70.6 billion.
• The White House estimate? Around $53.5 billion, which matches 2022 figures.

But here’s the issue: A trade deficit is not a subsidy.

“That’s never been the definition of a subsidy,” says Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. “A subsidy is a gift without compensation.”

Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti of the Brookings Institution adds that trade deficits reflect different national demands and economic specializations — not handouts.

Military Spending: Not a One-Way Street

The second part of the claim revolves around defense spending.

In 2024:

• Canada spent $29.3 billion on defense (about 1.3% of GDP).
• The U.S., by comparison, spent a whopping $997 billion, or 3.4% of its GDP — well above the NATO-recommended 2% benchmark.

True, Canada falls short of NATO’s target, and yes, Trump has repeatedly called out allies for that. But does that shortfall mean the U.S. is “subsidizing” Canada?

Not exactly, says Mark Cancian of the Center for Strategic and International Studies:

“No, they don’t owe us that money, but they aren’t paying their fair share, and that’s a fair criticism.”

To put it into perspective:

• If Canada were to meet the 2% NATO guideline, it would need to spend around $44.8 billion — meaning it currently underspends by about $15.5 billion.
• Add that to the trade deficit, and you still only reach about $51 billion — a far cry from $200 billion.

Even using the highest goods-only deficit, the total doesn’t exceed $86 billion.

What About NORAD?

NORAD — the U.S.-Canada joint air defense initiative — often comes up in these discussions.

The U.S. does cover about 60% of NORAD costs, based on a 1985 cost-sharing agreement. But actual spending details aren’t public, making the full picture unclear.

Canada has committed significant NORAD investments:

• $4.9 billion USD over 6 years
• $27.7 billion USD over 20 years (on an accrual basis)

Defense economists Binyam Solomon and Ross Fetterly published a 2023 paper analyzing NORAD’s cost-sharing. Here’s what they found:

• The U.S. shoulders roughly 97.6% of North American defense costs but receives 64% of the benefits.
• Canada contributes about 2%, but still benefits from 36% of the security umbrella.
• Adjusting for geographical vulnerabilities flips that benefit distribution sharply in the U.S.’s favor.

In other words, the U.S. may spend more — but it’s also protecting itself.

“Even if the Canadians pulled out, we’d have to have something like [NORAD] in place,” Cancian notes. “So I would not consider that a subsidy at all. Canadians can make a fair argument that we owe them.”

Bottom Line

No, the U.S. does not subsidize Canada by $200 billion a year.
The number is based on a misunderstanding — or misrepresentation — of trade deficits and military cooperation.

Even using inflated estimates, you don’t get anywhere near $200 billion. More importantly, labeling trade deficits and NATO shortfalls as “subsidies” simply isn’t accurate.

Misinformation about international relationships can erode trust and mislead the public. That’s why fact-checking matters — especially when the numbers don’t add up.

Source: AP News – FACT FOCUS: Trump claims the US subsidizes Canada. Experts say the numbers don’t add up

The post No, the U.S. Doesn’t Subsidize Canada by $200 Billion — Here’s the Real Story appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a surprise turn, former President Donald Trump announced on Sunday that he’s delaying a planned 50% tariff on European Union imports until July 9 — just days after doubling down on tough trade talk.

Speaking to reporters at Morristown Municipal Airport in New Jersey, Trump said the delay came after what he described as a “very nice call” with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

“She wants to get down to serious negotiation,” Trump said. “She asked if we could move the date from June 1 to July 9 — and I agreed. We’ll get together rapidly and see if we can work something out.”

This is the latest example of Trump walking back a tariff threat after initially rattling markets. Just Friday, he insisted the EU tariffs were set in stone and would take effect June 1. Those tariffs would have followed a previously announced — and also delayed — 20% reciprocal tariff from April.

Shortly after his remarks, Trump posted on Truth Social, confirming that trade talks would “begin rapidly.”

Von der Leyen echoed the sentiment in a post on X, calling it a “good call” and noting that the EU is ready to push ahead with negotiations. “To reach a good deal, we would need the time until July 9,” she said. “Europe is ready to advance talks swiftly and decisively.”

Market Reaction

News of the delay helped lift Asian stock markets modestly on Monday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 gained as much as 0.8%, South Korea’s KOSPI rose 0.9%, and China’s Shanghai Composite edged up 0.3%. Other indexes, including Taiwan’s TAIEX and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200, remained mostly flat, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng slipped 0.3%.

Behind the Tariff Talk

Trump has repeatedly criticized what he calls “non-monetary trade barriers” and often targets countries or blocs that run trade surpluses with the U.S. In 2024, the U.S. reported a $236 billion trade deficit with the EU, according to Commerce Department figures.

He’s also been vocal about reshaping the focus of U.S. manufacturing. On Sunday, Trump backed recent comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, suggesting America doesn’t need to bring back industries like textiles.

“We’re not looking to make sneakers and T-shirts,” Trump said. “We want to make military equipment. We want to do the ‘AI thing’ with computers.”

Source: CNN – Trump delays 50% EU tariffs until July 9

The post Trump Delays 50% EU Tariff to July 9 After Call With von der Leyen appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

President Donald Trump shook up the trade world Friday morning by threatening a 50% tariff on goods imported from the European Union. His warning came after what he described as stalled trade negotiations and longstanding grievances with EU trade policies.

In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump slammed the EU for what he calls unfair practices: “Powerful trade barriers, VAT taxes, corporate penalties, monetary manipulations, and unjust lawsuits against American companies” have contributed to a massive trade deficit with the U.S.—more than $250 billion annually, a figure Trump calls “totally unacceptable.”

“Our discussions with them are going nowhere,” he wrote bluntly. “Therefore, I am recommending a straight 50% tariff on the European Union, starting June 1, 2025.”

Immediate Reactions and Market Impact

The European Commission has yet to issue an official response. A spokesperson, Olof Gill, said he was awaiting a call between Maroš Šefčovič, the EU’s Trade Commissioner, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer—a discussion Reuters reports is scheduled for Friday morning.

Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent weighed in during a Fox News interview shortly after Trump’s post. Bessent criticized the EU’s recent proposals, saying they have not matched the quality of deals from other key U.S. partners. “I hope this lights a fire under the EU,” he added, noting the bloc faces a “collective action problem” that complicates negotiations.

Markets reacted swiftly to the news. European stock indexes took a hit: Germany’s DAX fell 2.4%, France’s CAC dropped 2.2%, and the STOXX 600 benchmark declined 1.7%. London’s FTSE slipped 1%. U.S. stocks opened lower too, with the Dow down by 480 points, or 1.15%.

How Does This Tariff Compare?

The 50% tariff Trump is proposing would be more than double the 20% tariff briefly imposed in April before a pause allowed more talks. That pause is set to expire on July 9.

Since then, the only major trade deal the U.S. has finalized has been with the United Kingdom. Treasury Secretary Bessent declined to name which countries might be next but said talks are “far along with India,” and several Asian nations have offered “very good deals.” He emphasized that most of America’s key trading partners are negotiating in good faith—“except the EU.”

What’s Fueling Trump’s Anger with the EU?

Trump has frequently targeted what he calls “non-monetary trade barriers”—policies that don’t directly involve currency but make U.S. exports less competitive. Among these, he points to the EU’s Value-Added Taxes (VATs) and Digital Service Taxes (DSTs).

• VATs are consumption taxes added to goods and services in the EU. While exports from the EU to the U.S. are exempted from VAT, American exports to Europe face this tax, making U.S. products more expensive there.
• DSTs target the revenue of large digital companies operating in the EU, including giants like Meta, Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft. This tax applies to gross revenues from online services—even unprofitable operations—hitting U.S. tech firms disproportionately.

According to a 2024 Congressional Research Service report, these taxes put American tech companies at a disadvantage compared to their European competitors.

Is a Trade War Escalating?

Trump’s aggressive tariff threat comes hot on the heels of another trade-related warning, this time targeting Apple. He suggested a 25% tariff on iPhones if the company continues producing them overseas rather than in the U.S.

Despite recent meetings between Trump, Apple CEO Tim Cook, and U.S. officials—including discussions during Trump’s Middle East trip and conversations with Treasury Secretary Bessent—the president remains frustrated. Cook has stated Apple plans to shift iPhone production from China to India to reduce tariff costs, but Trump insists the phones should be made on American soil.

What’s Next?

With the July 9 deadline looming for the paused EU tariffs and these sharp warnings from the White House, the next few weeks could prove critical for U.S.-EU trade relations. The outcome may have broad consequences for global markets and companies caught in the middle.

Stay tuned as this story develops.

Source: CNN – Trump threatens a 50% tariff on the EU

The post Trump Threatens 50% Tariffs on EU Over Stalled Trade Talks appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The U.S. economy experienced its worst quarter since 2022, with a notable contraction driven by President Donald Trump’s abrupt policy shifts, including escalating trade tensions and tariffs. As a result, consumer and business confidence took a significant hit.

The U.S. economy shrank by 0.3% in the first quarter of the year, according to the Commerce Department’s report released Wednesday. This marks a sharp slowdown from the previous quarter’s 2.4% growth rate, and the decline was far worse than the 0.8% growth economists had predicted. The figures reflect both seasonal adjustments and inflation.

Following the announcement, U.S. stock markets took a hit, with investors responding negatively to the unexpected downturn.

One of the key factors contributing to the decline was a widening trade deficit. With consumers rushing to purchase goods ahead of impending tariffs, imports surged by 41.3% in the first quarter, while exports grew at a much slower 1.8% rate. When imports exceed exports, it pulls down the GDP, and this trade imbalance was the biggest drag on economic growth since records began in 1947.

Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy, particularly aimed at China, has fueled concerns among economists who warn that the trade disruptions could lead to higher inflation and even a recession. Despite these challenges, the president downplayed the poor economic report, blaming the lingering effects of policies under President Biden.

“Our Country will boom, but we have to get rid of the Biden ‘Overhang,’” Trump posted on social media, insisting that the economic slump had nothing to do with tariffs.

While the first quarter’s GDP report showed clear signs of weakness, it wasn’t all bad news. Consumer spending, which is a major driver of the U.S. economy, slowed to just 1.8% from a more robust 4% in the previous quarter. This was largely due to reduced spending on goods, marking the weakest pace since mid-2023.

Government spending also decreased by 5.1%, a significant shift from the 4% increase in the fourth quarter. On the other hand, business investment surged by 9.8%, likely in anticipation of higher costs from tariffs. This increase in investment provided some optimism, though experts pointed out that much of the spending was aimed at stockpiling goods.

Another concerning detail from the report was a sharper-than-expected rise in inflation. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, a key inflation measure, jumped 3.6% in the first quarter—up from 2.4% in the fourth quarter. Excluding food and energy, the core PCE index increased by 3.5%, compared to 2.6% previously.

While inflation remains a worry, it’s not enough to definitively declare a recession. Recessions are defined as prolonged downturns that affect key sectors like labor, consumer spending, and business investment.

Though the economy showed signs of weakening, it’s still too early to declare a recession. A true recession involves a sustained downturn across various sectors, and while the data points to a slowdown, certain indicators—like the relatively low unemployment rate (4.2% in March)—remain positive.

Economists caution that the longer the tariff policies persist, the higher the likelihood of a full-blown recession. Gregory Daco, chief economist at Ernst & Young, pointed out that while we can’t officially call it a recession yet, the economy is teetering on the edge. The situation could worsen, particularly if trade policies remain unsettled.

Another red flag came from a separate report showing a sharp drop in private sector hiring. The ADP payroll report revealed that employers added just 62,000 jobs in April, well below the 147,000 jobs added in March. This slowdown in hiring reflects the growing uncertainty among businesses, making it harder to plan for the future.

Nela Richardson, chief economist at ADP, noted that the economic climate was making it difficult for companies to navigate policy changes and consumer unpredictability.

Though the economy remains on shaky ground, it’s important to note that the U.S. is not officially in a recession just yet. A recession is typically marked by two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth, and while the first quarter was disappointing, it’s not enough to call a definitive downturn.

For now, all eyes are on whether the U.S. government will adjust its trade policies and whether businesses and consumers will continue to absorb the impact of tariffs. The months ahead will be crucial in determining the long-term trajectory of the U.S. economy.

Source: CNN – US economy goes into reverse from Trump’s abrupt policy shifts

The post US Economy Faces Setback Due to Trump’s Tariff Policies appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Exports to the U.S. have long been a contentious issue in trade talks between Japan and the U.S., particularly under President Donald Trump’s administration. Negotiators from Japan are currently in Washington, lobbying against the threat of higher tariffs on Japanese goods. Japan, a key U.S. ally and major investor, employs hundreds of thousands of Americans, making it an integral part of the U.S. economy.

In early April, President Trump announced plans to impose a 24% tariff on imports from Japan as part of broader trade measures against multiple countries. However, following panic in the financial markets, Trump placed a partial 90-day hold on the tariff hike while simultaneously raising existing tariffs on Chinese goods to up to 145%.

Despite the temporary delay, Japan still faces significant tariff challenges. A 10% baseline tariff on various imports remains in place, along with a 25% tax on Japanese car imports, auto parts, and steel and aluminum exports. These duties have already taken a toll and present a challenge for Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s administration.

In response to the tariff tensions, some analysts speculate that Japan might make surprise concessions to ease trade relations. One potential move could involve increasing imports of American rice—an item of cultural significance in Japan. Historically, Japan has protected its rice industry, but rising domestic prices due to a shortage might prompt a shift in policy.

Despite the trade deficit, Japan’s exports saw a 5.9% increase over the past year, driven by strong shipments of computer chips and vehicles. Meanwhile, imports rose by 4.7%, with the weaker yen making imported goods more expensive.

Another factor contributing to the rise in exports is the recent surge in foreign tourism to Japan. Tourist spending counts as an export, further boosting Japan’s economic performance.

For the month of March, Japan recorded a trade surplus of 544 billion yen ($4 billion), with exports climbing nearly 4% from the previous year. This marked the sixth consecutive month of export gains, though the pace of growth slowed compared to February.

Exports to the U.S. rose by 3%, while shipments to other parts of Asia, such as Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea, grew by 5.5%. On the other hand, exports to China fell, reflecting a shift in trade patterns due to ongoing U.S.-China tariff conflicts.

Min Joo Kang, a senior economist at ING, noted that the rerouting of exports within Asia to avoid U.S. tariffs likely contributed to the increased shipments to neighboring countries. This strategy is a part of Japan’s broader efforts to mitigate the impact of the global trade tensions.

As Japan continues to navigate its complex trade relationships with the U.S., the outcome of these negotiations could shape the future of its economic growth and global trade standing.

Source: AP News – Japan reports a $63 billion trade surplus with the US as it talks with Trump on tariffs

The post Japan Reports $63 Billion Trade Surplus with the U.S. Amid Tariff Talks appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

WASHINGTON/TOKYO, April 16 — In a surprise move, former President Donald Trump announced he will personally attend a high-stakes meeting with Japanese trade officials in Washington on Wednesday, intensifying already tense discussions sparked by his sweeping new tariffs on global imports.

Originally expected to be a lower-profile negotiation between Japanese Economic Revitalization Minister Ryosei Akazawa and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the talks have now expanded — both in scope and spotlight — with Trump stepping in to push his broader agenda.

“Japan is coming in today to negotiate tariffs, the cost of military support, and ‘TRADE FAIRNESS,’” Trump posted on Truth Social.
“I will attend the meeting, along with Treasury & Commerce Secretaries. Hopefully something can be worked out which is good (GREAT!) for Japan and the USA!”

While Japan had hoped to keep the discussions limited to trade and investment, Trump has added other hot-button issues to the table — notably, Japan’s financial contributions to hosting U.S. military forces. Japan is home to the largest U.S. troop deployment overseas.

Treasury Secretary Bessent is also expected to raise the sensitive issue of currency policy, eyeing Tokyo’s approach to the yen — an issue Japan insists is not subject to manipulation for trade advantage.

Japan is one of several countries hit by Trump’s recent tariff rollout, including a 24% levy on exports to the U.S. While that rate is currently paused for 90 days, a baseline 10% tariff and a 25% duty on cars — a crucial sector for Japan — remain in effect.

Despite being one of the first to enter face-to-face negotiations, Japan is not eager to make major concessions. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has made it clear his government isn’t rushing into a deal — and for now, isn’t considering retaliation.

“The U.S. is offering to not hit Japan with sticks, and Japan is stuck in a position of offering a whole lot of carrots,” said Kurt Tong, managing partner at The Asia Group and a former State Department official.
“From their perspective, it feels like economic coercion.”

Japan is just one piece of Washington’s growing web of trade talks. Last week, Bessent met with Vietnam’s deputy prime minister and is scheduled to host South Korea’s finance minister next. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is also heading to the White House this week to talk tariffs affecting the European Union.

While the full scope of the U.S.-Japan meeting remains unclear, Bessent has floated the possibility of addressing not only tariffs and exchange rates but also Japanese investment in U.S. infrastructure — including a potential multi-billion-dollar gas project in Alaska.

Ahead of his trip, Akazawa expressed hope that Japan’s efforts to boost U.S. investment would be enough to avoid further tariffs.

“We want to show that Japan and the United States can both benefit — a win-win — without resorting to economic pressure,” Akazawa said.

Source: Reuters – Trump jumps in on tariff talks with Japanese officials

The post Tariffs, Troops, and Trade: Trump Joins Japan Negotiations appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

By launching a full-scale trade war, President Donald Trump is reshaping the global economic landscape—and not everyone’s convinced it’s for the better.

President Donald Trump has thrown global trade into turmoil. With a fresh wave of tariffs taking effect at midnight Wednesday, his administration has targeted dozens of countries, escalating a global trade conflict that’s already rattled financial markets and stirred fears of a potential recession.

What’s surprising to many economists is the timing. The U.S. economy—already the world’s strongest—was in excellent shape when Trump began his tariff crusade. Other major economies were slowing, yet Trump accused them of unfair practices and launched a broad attack on what he sees as a rigged system.

“There’s a deep irony in Trump claiming the U.S. is being treated unfairly when it’s outperforming the rest of the world,” said Eswar Prasad, a trade policy professor at Cornell University. “Even more ironic—these tariffs could end up damaging the very economy he’s trying to protect.”

To Trump and his advisers, tariffs are a cure-all: a way to protect American jobs, boost domestic manufacturing, punish unfair trade partners, and increase federal revenue. From foreign cars to Chinese electronics, few imports have been spared.

In his most aggressive move yet, Trump introduced a blanket 10% “baseline” tariff on most countries, while slapping punitive rates—some as high as 50%—on those he deemed bad actors. China, unsurprisingly, took the brunt with a total of 34% in tariffs.

Trump defends these measures as overdue justice for decades of economic “mugging” by allies and adversaries alike. “They’ve taken so much of our wealth away from us,” he declared during a White House celebration of the tariffs.

But critics say this view is outdated and economically flawed. While some countries do impose higher tariffs or offer subsidies to their industries, the U.S. remains the world’s second-largest exporter—behind only China—with $3.1 trillion in exports last year.

A key part of Trump’s argument centers on trade deficits. In 2024, the U.S. trade deficit hit $918 billion—the second-highest on record. To Trump and his trade adviser Peter Navarro, this is proof of widespread “cheating.”

But economists see it differently. They argue trade deficits are not inherently bad. In fact, the U.S. economy has nearly quadrupled over the last 50 years—despite running a deficit nearly every year.

“Trade deficits aren’t a sign of weakness,” said Maurice Obstfeld, former chief economist at the IMF. “They’re often a reflection of a strong economy that imports more because it consumes more.”

The truth, experts say, is simpler: Americans love to spend and save very little. That imbalance fuels demand for imports and widens the trade deficit—not necessarily foreign manipulation.

Jay Bryson, chief economist at Wells Fargo, put it bluntly: “It’s not like the rest of the world has been ripping us off. It’s because we don’t save enough.”

Ironically, this dynamic makes the U.S. incredibly attractive to foreign investors. In 2023, direct foreign investment into the U.S. totaled $349 billion—more than any country except Singapore.

While Trump touts tariffs as a tool to bring back U.S. factory jobs, history paints a more complex picture. After China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, the U.S. lost nearly 3 million manufacturing jobs—but automation likely played just as large a role.

Trump’s critics warn that tariffs may backfire. Since announcing the latest round of import taxes, the S&P 500 has dropped 12%, a sign that investors are nervous about where this trade war is headed.

“The only way tariffs shrink the trade deficit is if they also scare away investment,” said economist Barry Eichengreen. “That would be a disaster.”

Dani Rodrik of Harvard says a smarter approach would be targeted industrial policy with strategic tariffs—not sweeping measures that alienate allies and create uncertainty.

“Trump’s trade policy,” Rodrik said, “throws up a lot of chaos and delivers very little in return. It’s a terrible policy, all in all.”

Source: AP News – Trump disrupts global economic order even though the US is dominant

The post Trump’s Tariffs Shake Global Trade and Rattle Markets appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Trump’s proposed tariffs include:

• “Reciprocal” tariffs matching the rates imposed by other countries.
• 25% auto tariffs, aiming to push Americans toward U.S.-made vehicles.
• Taxes on key imports such as pharmaceuticals, copper, lumber, and steel.
• A 25% tariff on oil from Venezuela, despite the U.S. also importing it.
• A 20% tax on Chinese imports, justified by China’s role in fentanyl production.
• Additional tariffs on Canada and Mexico, citing concerns over drug smuggling and illegal immigration.

Trump argues these tariffs will restore economic fairness, claiming foreign nations have long “taken our jobs, our wealth, and much more.” However, the economic reality is more complicated.

Most economists predict that tariffs will lead to higher prices for everyday goods, from cars and groceries to housing materials. Here’s what to expect:

• Automobile Costs: Tariffs on foreign-made cars could raise vehicle prices significantly. Economist Art Laffer estimates a $4,711 price increase per vehicle if auto tariffs are fully implemented.
• Housing Prices: Mayor Andrew Ginther of Columbus, Ohio, warns that tariffs on building materials could increase the median home price by $21,000, making homeownership more difficult.
• Slower Economic Growth: Investment bank Goldman Sachs projects that economic growth could slow to 0.6% this quarter, a sharp drop from 2.4% at the end of last year.
• Inflation Risks: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent downplays inflation concerns, calling tariffs a “one-time price adjustment.” However, analysts warn that tariffs on goods could trigger higher costs for services, affecting industries from auto repair to insurance.

International leaders are preparing countermeasures, seeing Trump’s tariffs as harmful to global trade:

• Canada: Prime Minister Mark Carney criticized the tariffs, saying they mark the end of U.S.-Canada economic cooperation. Canada has already announced retaliatory tariffs.
• France: President Emmanuel Macron called the tariffs “not coherent,” warning they could break supply chains, fuel inflation, and destroy jobs.
• Mexico: President Claudia Sheinbaum is avoiding immediate retaliation but emphasizes the need to protect Mexican jobs.
• China: The Chinese government denounces the tariffs as a threat to the global trading system, stating, “There are no winners in trade wars.”

April 2 is the third time Trump has labeled a key date as “Liberation Day.” Previously, he used the term for Election Day (Nov. 5) and his potential Inauguration Day (Jan. 20, 2025). His repeated use of the phrase highlights how central tariffs are to his vision of economic nationalism.

While Trump sees tariffs as a tool for American economic strength, critics argue they could burden consumers, disrupt supply chains, and weaken global partnerships. With consumer confidence dipping and market uncertainty growing, “Liberation Day” may not feel like a celebration for everyone.

Source: AP News – Trump’s promised ‘Liberation Day’ of tariffs is coming. Here’s what it could mean for you

The post Trump’s New Tariffs Are Coming—Here’s How They Could Impact You appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

President Donald Trump’s long-anticipated tariffs on Canada and Mexico officially took effect on Tuesday, igniting tensions in global markets and setting the stage for retaliatory measures from the U.S.’s North American neighbors.

New Tariffs and Global Reactions

Starting just after midnight, imports from both Canada and Mexico are now subject to 25% tariffs, with Canadian energy products facing a 10% duty. These measures are part of Trump’s broader trade strategy, which has already sparked significant global reactions.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration doubled the tariff on Chinese imports from 10% to 20% in February, prompting Beijing to retaliate on Tuesday with tariffs of up to 15% on a wide range of U.S. farm exports. Additionally, China expanded restrictions on about two dozen American companies, tightening controls and escalating tensions.

Canada Responds with $100 Billion in Retaliatory Tariffs

In response to the U.S. tariffs, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a 25% tariff on $155 billion (Canadian) worth of American goods, beginning with an initial $30 billion worth of products. These retaliatory tariffs will remain in place until the U.S. rescinds its trade actions. Trudeau emphasized that Canada is committed to resolving the issue through ongoing discussions, but remains ready to implement further measures if necessary.

While Mexico did not immediately detail its retaliatory actions, it is expected to follow suit in some capacity. The escalating trade conflict has already begun to stir fears of higher inflation and the possibility of a full-scale trade war, as both countries and international markets prepare for a prolonged standoff.

Trump’s Trade Strategy: A Controversial Path to Prosperity

President Trump has been vocal about his belief that tariffs are a crucial tool for revitalizing the U.S. economy. He argued that imposing taxes on imports is the easiest path to national prosperity—despite warnings from mainstream economists about the long-term consequences. Trump said,
“It’s a very powerful weapon that politicians haven’t used because they were either dishonest, stupid, or paid off in some other form. And now we’re using them.”

The tariffs, initially set to take effect in February, were delayed by 30 days to allow further negotiations with Canada and Mexico. Trump has justified the tariffs as a means to combat drug trafficking and illegal immigration from both countries, although they have also been linked to a desire to address the U.S. trade imbalance. Trump has stated the tariffs could be reduced if the trade deficit closes, though this is unlikely to be resolved quickly.

Unpredictability and Economic Volatility

The U.S. tariffs have created a sense of economic uncertainty, with many wondering what moves Trump will make next. Michael House, co-chair of the international trade practice at the law firm Perkins Coie, described the situation as “chaotic” and “unpredictable.” He added,
“We don’t know, in fact, what the president will do.”

The global economy is now facing a fog of uncertainty, as retaliatory tariffs from Canada and China threaten to worsen the situation. Even after Trump’s announcement, Canadian officials remained in contact with their U.S. counterparts, signaling that diplomatic talks are ongoing despite the heightened tensions.

Domestic Reactions and Growing Concerns

The new tariffs have sparked concern among both Democratic and Republican lawmakers in the U.S., particularly those with close ties to industries that will be directly impacted. Senator Susan Collins of Maine expressed concern about how the tariffs could affect Maine’s economy, given the state’s reliance on Canadian processing for products like lobsters and blueberries.

Despite these concerns, Trump has continued to defend his approach, claiming that inflation caused by tariffs would not be as severe as some economists suggest. He pointed to recent business investments, such as the $100 billion commitment from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company to produce chips in the U.S., as evidence that his strategy is working.

Impact on U.S. Industries

While some businesses welcome the potential for more domestic manufacturing, others are sounding alarms. Greg Ahearn, CEO of The Toy Association, warned that the 20% tariffs on Chinese goods could be “crippling” for the toy industry, which relies heavily on imports from China. Ahearn noted the sophisticated manufacturing processes involved in producing toys and emphasized that it would take years, not months, for U.S. factories to catch up.

“That can’t be replicated overnight,” Ahearn cautioned, highlighting the challenge of reshoring complex production processes that have been built up over decades.

The Road Ahead: Tit-for-Tat Escalation

As the situation develops, Damon Pike, a trade expert at BDO, suggested the risk of further escalation is high. Both Canada and the European Union have their own lists of potential retaliatory measures ready, setting the stage for a tit-for-tat battle that could drag on for months or years.

With rising tensions and the threat of additional tariffs on industries like automobiles and pharmaceuticals, the world economy faces a period of heightened volatility and uncertainty as President Trump continues to push his trade agenda.

Source

The post US Tariffs on Canada and Mexico Take Effect, China Retaliates on Farm Exports appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.