Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has denied claims that his departure from Syria was planned, according to a statement posted Monday on the Syrian Presidency’s Telegram account. This marks the first time Assad has publicly addressed the events leading to his ousting earlier this month.

In the statement, purportedly from Assad, he insisted that he stayed in Damascus until the final hours before being evacuated to Russia.

Assad: “Departure Was Unplanned”

“My departure from Syria was neither planned nor did it occur during the final hours of the battles, as some have claimed. On the contrary, I remained in Damascus, carrying out my duties until the early hours of Sunday, December 8, 2024,” the statement read.

Assad claimed he moved to Russia’s airbase in Hmeimim on the morning of December 8 at Moscow’s request. Later that day, Russian officials evacuated him and his family when the base came under attack.

Collapse of Damascus Triggered Evacuation

The statement further alleged that the fall of Damascus and the collapse of Syria’s state institutions left no alternative but to evacuate.
“With no viable means of leaving the base, Moscow requested the base’s command arrange an immediate evacuation to Russia on the evening of December 8. This took place a day after Damascus fell, following the collapse of the final military positions and the paralysis of all remaining state institutions,” Assad explained.

“No Plans to Step Down”

Assad denied considering resignation or seeking asylum before his evacuation.
“At no point during these events did I consider stepping down or seeking refuge, nor was such a proposal made by any individual or party. The only course of action was to continue fighting against the terrorist onslaught,” he stated.

Assad justified his departure by claiming his position became meaningless after Syria’s takeover by what he described as “terrorists.”
“When the state falls into the hands of terrorism and the ability to make a meaningful contribution is lost, any position becomes void of purpose, rendering its occupation meaningless.”

Asylum in Russia

Assad and his family were granted asylum in Russia for “humanitarian reasons,” according to Russian officials. They arrived in Moscow late on December 8, following their evacuation from the Hmeimim airbase.

While it remains unclear if Assad controls the Telegram account from which the statement was posted, the message provides insight into his perspective on the dramatic fall of his regime and his subsequent relocation to Russia.

Source

The post Assad Denies Fleeing Syria: “Departure Was Unplanned” appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a strategic move to bolster security, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced on Sunday afternoon that it has taken control of the Syrian side of Mount Hermon. The operation aims to expand a demilitarized buffer zone along the Israel-Syria border and reinforce key defense positions.

Strategic Importance of Mount Hermon

The Hermon mountain range is widely regarded as a critical strategic asset. Its high elevation offers a commanding vantage point over the region, allowing Israel to monitor and preempt potential threats from invading forces.

The IDF clarified its stance on Syria’s internal affairs, stating that it would not intervene unless developments directly threaten Israeli security interests.

Targeting Syria’s Chemical Weapons Facility

Earlier in the week, on Tuesday, the IDF conducted an airstrike on a chemical weapons facility reportedly controlled by the regime of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The strike, initially reported by Arab media and later confirmed by The Jerusalem Post, was carried out to prevent Syrian rebels from seizing the facility.

An IDF spokesperson emphasized Israel’s proactive approach to neutralizing potential threats:
“The military monitors developments that could endanger Israeli security and takes the necessary steps to eliminate such dangers,” the statement said.

Israel’s Longstanding Strategy in Syria

For over a decade, Israel has maintained a policy of avoiding direct involvement in Syria’s internal conflict while taking decisive action to address security threats, particularly regarding advanced weapons. The IDF has conducted thousands of airstrikes in Syria since the civil war erupted, although it has publicly acknowledged only a small fraction of these operations.

Israel’s actions reflect a dual commitment: avoiding unnecessary escalation while ensuring that its borders remain secure and advanced weaponry does not fall into hostile hands.

This latest operation underscores the ongoing volatility in the region and the strategic measures Israel continues to adopt in safeguarding its security.

Source

The post Israel Takes Control of Syrian Mount Hermon for Strategic Defense appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The recent surge in Syrian rebel activity, led by Islamist forces, poses significant challenges to President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and has broad implications for the Middle East’s geopolitical balance. Key players—including Arab states, Iran, Israel, Russia, and Turkey—are reassessing their strategies as the conflict takes a dramatic turn.

The Rebellion’s Rapid Gains

In a swift offensive, rebels captured Aleppo and Hama, with ambitions to advance further south to Homs, edging closer to Damascus. The rebellion, spearheaded by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), has intensified calls for Assad’s removal. Rebel leader Abu Mohammad al-Jolani stated their aim: overthrowing the Assad regime by any means necessary.

Arab States: Shifting Alliances

The rebel advances test the commitment of Gulf Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which have pivoted from isolating Assad to supporting his regime. These states initially backed opposition forces during the Syrian civil war, seeing Assad’s downfall as a way to curb Iranian influence. However, Assad’s survival, aided by Russia and Iran, has led to his regional rehabilitation. Now, these nations are cautious, prioritizing stability over regime change.

Iran: A Vulnerable Axis

For Iran, Syria has been a cornerstone of its regional influence. Tehran’s military support, through the IRGC and Hezbollah, has been crucial for Assad. However, the rebellion’s momentum exposes Iran’s vulnerabilities, especially as Hezbollah redirects resources to the conflict with Israel. The loss of Syrian territory could disrupt Iranian supply routes to proxies and weaken its strategic position, forcing Tehran into a delicate balancing act between defending its interests and pursuing diplomacy with the West.

Israel: Navigating Threats

Israel finds itself in a complex situation. While Assad’s regime has allowed Iranian military presence in Syria, it hasn’t directly threatened Israel. The current rebellion, however, led by Islamist groups like HTS, presents new risks. Israel must ensure the rebellion doesn’t empower hostile forces while continuing to target Iranian assets in Syria. For now, Israel benefits from Iran and its proxies being weakened, but the long-term implications remain uncertain.

Russia: Stretched Thin

Russia’s intervention in 2015 was pivotal in stabilizing Assad’s rule. Yet, the ongoing rebellion challenges Moscow’s ability to maintain its influence in Syria, especially as its focus shifts to the war in Ukraine. While Russian airstrikes have ramped up against rebel positions, the rapid rebel advances highlight the limits of Moscow’s capacity to mobilize resources effectively in Syria.

Turkey: Strategic Maneuvering

Turkey, the primary backer of the Syrian National Army, plays a dual role—supporting opposition forces while exploring a potential rapprochement with Assad. President Erdogan seeks to position Turkey advantageously, aiming for significant concessions from Assad in future negotiations. Another priority for Turkey is addressing its domestic challenges, including hosting 3.1 million Syrian refugees, by pushing for a buffer zone along its border and countering Kurdish insurgents.

A Region in Flux

The Syrian rebellion reshapes regional power dynamics, with key players recalibrating their approaches. For Assad’s allies, the stakes are high as they face the possibility of losing a critical foothold. Meanwhile, neighboring nations and global powers tread cautiously, balancing immediate interests with long-term stability in a volatile Middle East.

Source

The post Syria’s Rebel Advance: A Game-Changer for Middle East Power appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In the volatile landscape of Syria, U.S. forces find themselves at the center of escalating tensions involving the Syrian regime, Iranian-backed militias, and regional complexities. Originally deployed to support the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in their fight against ISIS, U.S. troops are now operating in critical hotspots near the Euphrates River as the conflict intensifies.

Key Flashpoints in Syria

Following the Syrian regime’s loss of Aleppo in late November, a series of cascading events unfolded. Turkish-backed militias launched attacks on the SDF, exacerbating tensions between the SDF and regime forces. U.S. forces, stationed primarily in eastern Syria, are strategically positioned near the Euphrates River Valley, a region of immense strategic importance.

• Eastern Euphrates: Controlled by the SDF.
• Western Euphrates: Held by the Syrian regime, particularly in Deir Ezzor and surrounding areas, extending to the Iraqi border.
• Khasham Pocket: A small but significant area on the eastern Euphrates controlled by Iranian-backed militias, now a site of ongoing clashes.

Over the last six years, Iranian-backed militias have entrenched themselves along the Euphrates, launching sporadic drone and rocket attacks on U.S. forces. Recent U.S. operations have targeted these threats, highlighting the precarious balance in the region.

U.S. Response to Imminent Threats

On December 3, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed a self-defense strike against hostile forces. The operation destroyed multiple weapon systems, including rocket launchers, a T-64 tank, an armored personnel carrier, and mortars. These assets posed a direct threat to U.S. and Coalition forces.

CENTCOM emphasized that the U.S. mission in Syria remains unchanged, focusing on the enduring defeat of ISIS. The strikes underscore the U.S. commitment to protecting its forces while continuing collaboration with regional partners.

The Role of Airpower

Footage circulating online shows U.S. A-10 warplanes operating in the area. These aircraft, known for their close air support capabilities, are equipped with powerful Avenger cannons designed to neutralize armored vehicles and enemy ground forces effectively.

The presence of A-10s signifies a robust display of U.S. military strength, sending a clear message to both the Syrian regime and Iranian-backed militias amid the chaos in Syria.

Regional Dynamics

Iran remains a staunch opponent of U.S. operations in Syria, accusing the U.S. and Israel of orchestrating anti-regime actions. Meanwhile, Russia and Turkey also oppose the U.S. presence, further complicating the geopolitical landscape.

In this intricate and hostile environment, U.S. forces continue to navigate the challenges of supporting their allies, countering threats, and maintaining stability in eastern Syria. The situation underscores the enduring complexity of the Syrian conflict and the critical role of U.S. military strategy in the region.

Source

The post Why US Troops in Syria Face Growing Threats from Iran and the Regime appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.