Vučić announced the resignation at the Serbian presidency in Belgrade and signed a formal letter relinquishing the office. He said he wanted to participate in the parliamentary election as an ordinary citizen. Serbia’s government said he would hand presidential duties to National Assembly Speaker Ana Brnabić the following morning.

The resignation comes less than a month before the parliamentary vote, which was already scheduled after Vučić dissolved the National Assembly and called early elections for October 25. The Republic Electoral Commission has since been conducting the electoral process and publishing decisions concerning candidate lists and voting arrangements.

Vučić has said he intends to lead the Serbian Progressive Party, or SNS, in the parliamentary contest and seek the prime minister’s position if the party secures the parliamentary support needed to form a government.

What happens after the resignation

Serbia’s Constitution provides a clear succession process when a president leaves office before the end of a term.

Article 117 states that the president’s mandate ends on the day the resignation is submitted. Article 120 provides that the National Assembly speaker replaces the president when the presidential mandate ends prematurely and may exercise that role for a maximum of three months. The speaker must also call a presidential election to take place no later than three months after the vacancy occurs.

That means Brnabić becomes acting head of state rather than taking over as a new elected president.

Vučić said presidential elections must be held by the end of December. The exact election date had not yet been announced when he resigned.

The transition to an acting presidency does not cancel the parliamentary election already scheduled for October 25.

The Republic Electoral Commission was still carrying out preparations for that vote as of September 25, including decisions on polling-station arrangements, election forms and certified electoral lists.

Why Vučić is leaving office now

Vučić was elected president for a second time in May 2022. Serbia’s Constitution limits an individual to two presidential terms, preventing him from seeking a third.

Rather than leave national politics after the end of his presidency, Vučić has chosen to pursue another route through the parliamentary system.

He had already announced that he intended to step down and seek the prime minister’s position. On September 14, he said he would resign on September 27 and campaign in the October 25 parliamentary election.

His resignation therefore does not represent a withdrawal from political life. It changes the office he is seeking.

Under Serbia’s constitutional system, the president and prime minister have different responsibilities. The president is directly elected, while the government exercises executive power and is accountable to the National Assembly. The prime minister is elected by parliament following the formation of a government.

Vučić cannot guarantee himself the prime ministership simply by leaving the presidency. The parliamentary election must first determine the composition of the National Assembly, after which a government has to be formed.

October vote follows months of political unrest

The parliamentary election comes after an extended period of demonstrations centered on the government and demands for institutional accountability.

The protests began after the November 1, 2024, collapse of a concrete canopy at the railway station in Novi Sad killed 16 people. Student-led demonstrations subsequently spread across Serbia, with protesters demanding accountability over the disaster and broader changes in the political system.

The government has rejected accusations of systemic responsibility for the collapse and allegations made by opponents concerning corruption and control of the media. Vučić and his allies have also disputed accusations made against the government during the protest movement.

The demonstrations eventually developed into a challenge at the ballot box.

A student-backed political movement formally entered the parliamentary contest in September, submitting an electoral list to the state election authorities. Several established opposition groups have expressed support for the movement or chosen not to compete separately.

The election will therefore bring competing political forces into the same institutional process that protesters have been demanding.

The parliamentary election was already under way

Vučić dissolved the National Assembly on September 9 after the Serbian government formally proposed an early election.

His decree dissolved the parliament elected in December 2023 and scheduled parliamentary elections for October 25. The government said the electoral timetable began once the decision entered into force.

The Republic Electoral Commission has since approved electoral lists, made decisions concerning national-minority lists and issued administrative rules governing polling places and the counting of votes.

The resignation therefore comes after the electoral process had already formally begun.

That distinction is important because the presidential transition and parliamentary election now run on parallel tracks.

Brnabić will temporarily exercise presidential duties

Ana Brnabić, the speaker of the National Assembly, is the constitutional successor to the presidential duties following Vučić’s resignation.

The Serbian government said she would assume the role of acting president on September 28. The Constitution limits the speaker’s replacement of the president to three months.

Her role is temporary.

The constitution requires a presidential election within the three-month period, meaning the country will have a direct presidential contest separate from the October parliamentary election.

Vučić’s decision therefore produces two separate electoral events in a relatively short period: the October 25 parliamentary election and a presidential election required by the constitutional deadline.

A change of office, not necessarily a change of political influence

Vučić has been a central figure in Serbian politics for more than a decade, serving as prime minister before becoming president in 2017. His political organization remains the governing force at the center of the upcoming parliamentary contest.

His resignation means that he will no longer occupy the country’s presidency during the parliamentary campaign.

It does not, however, remove him from the election.

Instead, it places him directly inside the parliamentary contest as a prospective head of government.

Whether that transition can occur depends on the composition of the next National Assembly and the subsequent process of forming a government. The constitution assigns the National Assembly a central role in electing the government and prime minister.

That makes October 25 important not simply because it is an early legislative election, but because its outcome will determine whether Vučić’s proposed move from president to prime minister can take place.

Serbia now faces a compressed political timetable

The country is entering a period in which parliamentary campaigning, an acting presidency and a separate presidential election will overlap.

The immediate date is October 25, when voters will choose a new National Assembly.

After that, the formation of the next government will determine whether Vučić can move into the prime minister’s office.

At the same time, the acting presidency will remain temporary, with the Constitution requiring a presidential election within three months of the vacancy.

For Serbia, the significance of Vučić’s resignation therefore lies less in the disappearance of a political figure than in the institutional transition it initiates.

The presidency is changing hands on an interim basis.

The parliamentary election is approaching.

And the country’s governing arrangement could be reshaped again when the presidential election follows.

Reporting Credit: Government of the Republic of Serbia — official announcement of Aleksandar Vučić’s resignation, transfer of presidential duties and October 25 parliamentary election; Constitutional Court of Serbia — constitutional provisions governing presidential resignation, replacement and the presidential election deadline; Republic Electoral Commission of Serbia — official electoral timetable, candidate-list decisions and preparations for the October 25 parliamentary election; National Assembly of Serbia — constitutional and parliamentary information relevant to the temporary presidential succession and government formation process.

The post Serbia’s Vučić Resigns as President Ahead of October Snap Election appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

LISBON, Portugal — In a move that has captured attention ahead of Portugal’s upcoming national election, the country’s caretaker government has announced plans to expel around 18,000 foreigners living in the country without proper authorization.

The announcement was made by Minister of the Presidency António Leitão Amaro on Saturday, who explained that the center-right government will begin issuing notifications to approximately 18,000 individuals living illegally in Portugal. Starting next week, officials will request that 4,500 foreigners voluntarily leave within 20 days.

Portugal’s early general election is scheduled for May 18, following a political shake-up in March. Prime Minister Luis Montenegro, leader of the conservative Social Democratic Party, called the snap election after his minority government lost a confidence vote in Parliament and subsequently resigned.

This decision comes at a time when Europe is grappling with the rise of populism, and Portugal is no exception. The far-right Chega party surged into third place during last year’s election, reflecting the growing strength of nationalist movements across the continent.

The mass expulsion of unauthorized immigrants has stirred political debate, with some viewing it as a significant move in the lead-up to the election, which is expected to be a pivotal moment for Portugal’s political future. The government’s action signals a hardline stance on immigration that could shape the national discourse as voters head to the polls.

Source: AP News – Portugal announces the expulsion of 18,000 foreigners ahead of a national election

The post Government Orders Thousands of Unauthorized Migrants to Leave appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Friedrich Merz, a 69-year-old veteran politician known for his hardline stance on migration and love of aviation, is the frontrunner to become Germany’s next chancellor in the February 23 federal election.

But who is this old-school conservative determined to steer his party, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), away from Angela Merkel’s centrist legacy?

A Political Comeback Decades in the Making

Merz’s return to frontline politics was set in motion when Merkel stepped down as CDU leader in 2021. After two failed attempts, he finally won party leadership in 2022.

His opportunity for the chancellery arose after the collapse of Germany’s governing coalition—a fragile alliance of the Social Democrats (SPD), Free Democrats (FDP), and Greens—leading to a snap election.

If the CDU wins, Merz will inherit a country in crisis. His promises include:
Reviving the economy after years of stagnation
Cracking down on migration
Lowering taxes
Regaining votes from the far right

However, his path hasn’t been without controversy. A brief flirtation with the hard-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) weeks before the election triggered backlash and accusations of breaking mainstream parties’ firewall against the AfD.

From Beer Coasters to Big Business: The Making of Merz

Born in 1955 into a conservative Catholic family in Brilon, North Rhine-Westphalia, Merz joined the CDU’s youth wing while still in school. He launched his political career in 1989, becoming a Member of the European Parliament at 33.

After one term, he moved to the Bundestag (German parliament), where he made his mark on financial policy. In 2003, he famously proposed simplifying tax rules to the point they could be calculated on the back of a beer coaster.

But his rivalry with Merkel cut his political career short.

2000: Lost CDU leadership bid to Merkel
2002: Merkel replaced him as opposition leader in the Bundestag
2009: Left politics for the private sector

In the corporate world, Merz became a multimillionaire, working as a lawyer and senior counsel at international law firm Mayer Brown. His business background has helped fuel his image as a leader who can fix Germany’s struggling economy, which shrank for a second consecutive year in 2024.

Breaking from Merkel’s ‘Carpet of Fog’

Merz has made no secret of his desire to undo Merkel’s legacy.

He blames her leadership for creating a “carpet of fog” over Germany
He criticized her 2015 open-door refugee policy as a grave mistake
He moved the CDU further to the right to stop voters from defecting to the AfD

His hardline stance on immigration includes:
Rejecting asylum seekers arriving from other EU countries at Germany’s borders
Criticizing liberal welfare policies, accusing Ukrainian refugees of “social tourism” (a phrase he later apologized for)
Slashing welfare spending, arguing against “paying people who are not willing to work”

Merkel, who has largely stayed out of politics, publicly rebuked Merz in January after he pushed an immigration bill with AfD support—though it was ultimately defeated in parliament.

Despite the backlash, Merz has since reaffirmed:
“There is no cooperation with this party [AfD],” he told CNN.

Foreign Policy: Ukraine, Israel, and Trump

On military aid, Merz supports a stronger stance than the outgoing SPD-led government, particularly regarding Ukraine:

He advocates sending long-range Taurus missiles to Kyiv, a step Chancellor Olaf Scholz has refused due to fears of escalating the conflict.
He backs Germany’s continued military aid to Israel while supporting a two-state solution.

Meanwhile, he remains cautious about Trump. In a recent debate, he expressed unease over Trump’s proposal to “take over” Gaza, but added that it remains unclear “what is really meant seriously.”

On Germany’s defense spending, he has acknowledged that it must increase, though he has been vague on specific targets.

The Final Stretch

Merz’s campaign has focused on:
Economic revival (tax cuts, deregulation, and incentives to work)
Stronger migration controls
More assertive foreign policy

But his elite background has also drawn scrutiny. A passionate aviation enthusiast, Merz is known for flying his own private plane—an expensive hobby for someone who once described himself as “upper middle class”.

With election day approaching, the question remains:
Will Merz finally get his chance to lead Germany?

Source

The post Friedrich Merz: Germany’s Conservative Frontrunner in the 2025 Election appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

BERLIN — While global attention was focused on the recent U.S. presidential election, Germany witnessed a dramatic political shake-up: the collapse of its ruling coalition. Hours after the U.S. election results were confirmed, Chancellor Olaf Scholz publicly declared the end of his fragile three-party alliance, sparking the countdown to a German snap election. Although the exact date isn’t set, it’s expected to occur within the coming months.

Here’s a breakdown of what led to the coalition’s collapse and what to expect moving forward.

Why Did the Coalition Fall Apart?

Germany’s ruling coalition was a tenuous blend of three parties with conflicting ideologies: the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Greens, who advocate for a robust social safety net and green investment, and the fiscally conservative Free Democratic Party (FDP), which favors limited government and restrained spending.

So, why were they working together? The answer lies in Germany’s increasingly fragmented political landscape, which has made traditional two-party coalitions challenging to form. This shift is largely due to the rise of smaller parties, including the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which now holds second place in national polls, and the populist-left Alliance Sarah Wagenknecht (BSW). As a result, multi-party coalitions may become the norm despite their inherent volatility.

The coalition’s unraveling began last year with a ruling from Germany’s top court. The court outlawed a budgeting workaround the coalition used to bypass the country’s “debt brake” law. Relying on special funds outside the main budget, the workaround was deemed unconstitutional, leaving a €60 billion gap in federal finances. Without the funds needed to bridge ideological divides, the coalition faced mounting pressure from within and low approval ratings. The FDP’s leader, Christian Lindner, repeatedly threatened to pull out, but Scholz preempted him by dismissing Lindner from his cabinet, leading to the FDP’s exit.

Could an Election Happen Quickly?

Germany’s election logistics may complicate matters. Although there is political support for an early vote, Germany’s federal body overseeing elections warned that organizing a vote in early 2025 would present “incalculable risks,” citing potential shortages in paper and printing resources.

What’s Likely to Happen Next?

Current polls suggest that Friedrich Merz’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), are the frontrunners, with 32% support. They’re likely to lead the next coalition. However, Scholz’s SPD, polling at 16%, trails behind the CDU and the AfD. Given that the CDU has ruled out forming a federal coalition with the AfD, it may once again partner with the SPD or a third party.

The SPD could be under new leadership by then, and if polling trends hold, they may require additional partners to govern effectively. The Greens, polling at around 10%, and the FDP, polling at 4% (below the parliamentary threshold), remain potential coalition candidates, although their ideological differences with the CDU could create tensions.

Why Does This Matter?

Germany’s political uncertainty comes amid escalating global tensions. As leaders debate the timing of a confidence vote, Russia and North Korea appear to be preparing for joint maneuvers against Ukrainian forces. Meanwhile, Russian troops are reportedly making progress along other Ukrainian front lines.

In short, Germany’s political direction and stability are of paramount importance, both domestically and internationally, as it navigates these challenging times.

Source

The post Germany on the Brink: Key Players and Potential Outcomes in the Snap Election appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.