For Pauline Stuart, the news was almost unbelievable: the man believed responsible for her teenage son’s death is finally behind bars.

“It still feels unreal,” she told CNN. “I thought it would never happen, but law enforcement never gave up.”

The suspect, Alfred Kassi, was arrested in Côte d’Ivoire — thousands of miles from the Northern California home where her 17-year-old son, Ryan Last, took his own life in 2022. Alongside three accomplices, Kassi is charged in connection with an international sextortion scheme targeting thousands, including minors across the U.S., Canada, the U.K., France, Spain, and Italy.

What is Sextortion?

Sextortion is a dangerous online scam where perpetrators trick victims—often children—into sending explicit images, then demand money or more photos under threat of exposing those images to family or friends.

In Ryan’s case, it began with a message from someone pretending to be a girl. Within hours, a nightmare unfolded.

A Teen’s Final Hours

Ryan, a straight-A student and Boy Scout, received the message on a school night in February 2022. The scammer sent him a nude photo, then pressured him for one in return. After Ryan complied, they demanded $5,000 — threatening to share the image publicly if he didn’t pay.

Unable to meet the demand, Ryan’s family savings were drained as the extortionists continued to push for more money.

By 2 a.m., just hours after saying goodnight to his mom, Ryan tragically ended his life. His suicide note revealed his overwhelming fear and embarrassment.

“He truly believed there was no way out if those pictures were shared,” Stuart said. “No child should ever be that scared.”

A Growing Crisis

The FBI and other U.S. agencies have reported a sharp rise in sextortion cases, prompting nationwide warnings to parents.

Experts say teens are particularly vulnerable because their brains are still developing, making it hard to see beyond immediate crises.

Dr. Scott Hadland of Mass General for Children explains, “When something catastrophic like this happens, teens struggle to imagine things getting better.”

Protecting Teens Online

Hadland urges parents to stay involved in their kids’ online lives—know who they talk to, what platforms they use, and watch for signs of pressure to share personal info or photos.

Crucially, he advises parents to approach the subject without judgment. “Make sure your teens know they can talk to you if they make a mistake or feel scared.”

Pauline Stuart agrees. “We need to talk openly with our kids and make them aware of these dangers.”

Justice and Cooperation

Kassi and his accomplices will face prosecution in Côte d’Ivoire, where they were arrested. The country doesn’t extradite its citizens, but authorities there have cybercrime laws that apply.

The FBI investigation was aided by San Jose police, the U.S. State Department, and Meta (Facebook’s parent company), which provided key information to identify the suspects.

The Justice Department noted that Kassi still had sextortion messages sent to Ryan on his phone at the time of arrest, underscoring the ongoing threat these criminals posed.

Source: CNN – ‘Sextortion’ ring targeting thousands of minors worldwide was just disrupted by the FBI, officials say

The post FBI Breaks Up Global Sextortion Ring After Teen’s Tragic Death appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Australia has enacted a world-first law prohibiting children under 16 from accessing social media, placing significant accountability on tech companies to tighten security. The law, passed by the Senate on the final sitting day of the year, requires companies to take “reasonable steps” to enforce the ban or face fines of up to AUD 50 million (USD 32 million).

This unprecedented move is a response to the growing concerns about social media’s impact on youth. While other nations have introduced similar restrictions, Australia is the first to hold companies accountable for violations. Platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, and X are expected to fall under the ban, with the possibility of more being added.

Government and Public Reactions

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese highlighted the growing global concern over social media’s effects on young people, describing it as a platform that can amplify bullying, anxiety, scams, and online predation. “At 16, children are better equipped to recognize fakes and dangers,” Albanese told Parliament.

The bill received bipartisan support, with Liberal Sen. Maria Kovacic calling it a “pivotal moment” in checking the power of tech giants. “We’ve drawn a line in the sand,” she said.

However, the law faced strong opposition from smaller parties and independents. Greens Sen. Sarah Hanson-Young criticized the rushed process and warned that it could push vulnerable youth into isolation. “Social media should be made safer for everyone, not banned arbitrarily,” she argued.

A Rushed Legislative Process

The bill’s rapid progression has drawn criticism for insufficient consultation. Submissions to a Senate inquiry were open for only 24 hours, followed by a brief three-hour hearing. Despite receiving over 100 submissions, most contributors expressed concerns about the lack of thorough review.

The Senate committee recommended some amendments, including prohibiting the use of government-issued documents, like passports, for age verification.

Tech Companies’ Concerns

Tech companies raised objections, citing privacy risks and the challenges of enforcing the law. Snap Inc., the maker of Snapchat, suggested “device-level age verification” as the best solution. X, owned by Elon Musk, expressed concern about freedom of expression. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, advocated for waiting on results from age verification trials expected next year.

Meta also criticized the exclusion of platforms like YouTube and online gaming from the ban, arguing this undermines the law’s intent.

Public Support and Next Steps

Despite criticisms, the law enjoys strong public backing. A recent YouGov poll showed 77% of Australians support the ban.

The government will now consult stakeholders to determine a start date. Once implemented, accounts belonging to users under 16 will be deactivated. While parents and children will not face penalties for violations, companies must demonstrate robust efforts to comply.

This landmark legislation signals a turning point in how nations address the complex relationship between social media and youth, setting a precedent for others to follow.

Source

The post Australia Bans Social Media for Under-16s: What It Means for Kids and Tech Companies appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The rapid evolution of social media has transformed how young people connect, but it has also brought significant challenges, including cyberbullying and harmful online behavior. These issues are at the heart of Australia’s heated debate over proposed legislation to ban social media use for children under 16.

A Cyber Safety Expert’s Eye-Opening Experience

Kirra Pendergast, a cyber safety educator, has spent years educating teenagers about the risks of online behavior. However, a recent incident left her shocked and emotionally shaken. During a presentation at an Australian high school, a group of 12- and 13-year-old boys began shouting misogynistic slurs inspired by online influencers. Despite efforts from teachers to calm the students, the hostility escalated, culminating in an expletive-filled remark from a girl that drove Pendergast to leave the session in tears.

“This behavior is clearly driven by things they’ve seen online, and it has to change,” she said in a heartfelt video afterward.

Once an opponent of banning social media for children, Pendergast has shifted her stance. “Ban it. Just ban it,” she declared, citing her frustration with the toxic influence of social platforms on young minds.

Proposed Legislation: A Bold Move

The Australian government is pushing for a “world-leading” law that would prohibit children under 16 from accessing platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter). If passed, social media companies that fail to enforce this ban could face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($32 million).

The legislation proposes age verification measures to ensure compliance, though critics argue that such measures raise privacy concerns. The government has pledged to address these issues within the framework of the law.

A Growing Crisis: The Cost of Inaction

The urgency behind the legislation is underscored by tragic cases of young lives lost due to online bullying. Two 12-year-old girls, Charlotte O’Brien and Ella Catley-Crawford, took their own lives after being targeted on platforms like Snapchat. Their families have since become advocates for stricter age limits on social media, presenting a petition with over 124,000 signatures to raise the minimum age from 13 to 16.

Charlotte’s parents, Matthew Howard and Kelly O’Brien, described the devastating impact of online bullying. “No parent wants to go through what we’re going through,” Howard said, emphasizing the need for change.

Supporters and Critics of the Ban

Proponents of the ban argue that it could save lives and shield children from harm during formative years. Clinical psychologist Dr. Danielle Einstein supports the measure, noting that social media often replaces critical face-to-face interactions, limiting children’s ability to resolve conflicts and build meaningful relationships.

However, critics believe the legislation is a blunt tool that may drive children toward unregulated parts of the internet. A joint letter signed by more than 140 experts called the ban a rushed response that shifts responsibility away from tech companies to create safer platforms.

Amanda Third, co-director of the Young and Resilient Research Centre, opposes the ban, arguing that the current minimum age of 13 is appropriate for many children. She warns that the legislation is politically motivated, with upcoming federal elections and a media campaign by News Corp possibly influencing the push for stricter regulations.

Tech Industry Pushback

Tech companies have expressed concerns about the proposed ban. During a Senate hearing, Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, reiterated its zero-tolerance policy for bullying, urging users to report and block offenders. Instagram, owned by Meta, launched an anti-bullying campaign to promote strategies for handling online harassment. However, these efforts have been criticized as insufficient by parents and advocates.

What’s at Stake?

The debate continues to polarize parents, educators, and policymakers. While some see the ban as a necessary step to protect children, others worry about its potential downsides, including privacy concerns and enforcement challenges.

Cyber safety educator Pendergast believes that even one life saved justifies the legislation. “Why would we deny a child that protection?” she asked. “The only ones losing while we argue are the kids.”

The proposed law has sparked a national conversation about the role of social media in children’s lives, the responsibilities of tech companies, and the broader societal impacts of digital platforms. As Australia moves toward a decision, the world will be watching to see how this bold experiment unfolds.

Source

The post Should Social Media Be Banned for Under-16s? Australia’s Bold Proposal Sparks Debate appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.