Prince Harry’s lengthy legal battle with Rupert Murdoch’s British newspaper group reached an unexpected conclusion on Wednesday, with the Duke of Sussex settling his case just before his trial was set to begin. The lawsuit, filed against News Group Newspapers (NGN) – the publisher behind The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World – accused the tabloids of unlawful information gathering, including phone hacking and surveillance, between 1996 and 2011.

At a London High Court hearing, David Sherborne, Prince Harry’s barrister, announced that NGN had issued a “full and unequivocal apology” to the duke. The apology acknowledged the serious intrusion into Prince Harry’s private life during the aforementioned years and the unlawful activities conducted by private investigators hired by The Sun. NGN also apologized for the phone hacking, surveillance, and misuse of private information carried out by the journalists and private investigators at News of the World, another publication under the NGN umbrella.

Sherborne read the full apology on behalf of NGN, which also expressed regret for the impact the coverage had on Prince Harry’s life and relationships, as well as on his late mother, Diana, Princess of Wales. “We acknowledge and apologize for the distress caused to the duke, and the damage inflicted on relationships, friendships, and family,” Sherborne said. NGN further agreed to pay Prince Harry substantial damages as part of the settlement. They also acknowledged that their response to the 2006 arrests related to phone hacking was regrettable, though without admitting any illegality.

Alongside Prince Harry, former Labour Party deputy leader Tom Watson, who had also filed a claim, settled his own case. Watson, who was targeted between 2009 and 2011, alleged unlawful information gathering and phone hacking during his investigation into the Murdoch newspapers. His investigation played a key role in the 2011 phone hacking scandal, which led to the closure of News of the World and Murdoch’s public apology for the scandal.

Sherborne confirmed that NGN also apologized to Watson for the “unwarranted intrusion” into his private life during his time in government, specifically during the 2009-2011 period.

The legal proceedings at the London High Court were initially scheduled to start on Tuesday, but were delayed multiple times after requests from both sides’ legal teams.

This surprising settlement brings an end to a chapter of legal actions and media scrutiny for the Duke of Sussex, who has long been outspoken about the media’s treatment of him and his family.

Source

The post Prince Harry Reaches Settlement with News Group Newspapers in Legal Battle appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A Nevada court commissioner has rejected media mogul Rupert Murdoch’s attempt to modify the family trust governing his vast media empire, echoing the intense power struggles depicted in the TV series Succession.

The Battle for Control

The case revolved around Murdoch, 93, and his eldest son, Lachlan, seeking to secure sole control of News Corp and Fox News after Murdoch’s death. The proposed changes would have minimized interference from Murdoch’s three other adult children—Prudence, Elisabeth, and James.

However, the court found the attempt to amend the 1999 family trust to be a “carefully crafted charade,” ruling that Murdoch and Lachlan had acted in “bad faith,” according to The New York Times.

Family Divided

In response, Prudence, Elisabeth, and James issued a joint statement welcoming the ruling and expressing hope for reconciliation:

“We welcome Commissioner Gorman’s decision and hope that we can move beyond this litigation to focus on strengthening and rebuilding relationships among all family members.”

Murdoch’s attorney, Adam Streisand, expressed disappointment with the decision and announced plans to appeal.

Echoes of Fiction

The Murdoch family’s real-life tensions were reportedly heightened after an episode of HBO’s Succession—a series inspired in part by their empire—featured the patriarch’s sudden death, leading to chaos among his heirs. This spurred Elisabeth’s representative to draft a “Succession memo” aimed at avoiding such turmoil.

Murdoch’s youngest daughters, Grace and Chloe, from his later marriages, do not hold voting rights under the trust, further narrowing the power dynamics to his eldest four children.

Legacy at Stake

The battle centers not on wealth but on control of a media empire that spans influential outlets like The Times, The Sun, and The Wall Street Journal, as well as Fox News. Differences in political and ideological leanings among the children have exacerbated family tensions, with Lachlan seen as more conservative and aligned with his father’s vision.

Since the 1960s, Murdoch has cultivated a media dynasty with global influence. He groomed his sons for leadership from a young age, emphasizing the importance of family in shaping the future of his empire.

What’s Next?

While the commissioner’s ruling is a significant setback for Murdoch and Lachlan, it is not final. A district judge will review the case and could issue a different decision.

For now, the court’s decision underscores the fragility of dynastic succession in the face of personal and ideological divides, leaving the future of the Murdoch empire in question.

Source

The post Court Blocks Rupert Murdoch’s Attempt to Alter Family Trust appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.