Amazon has clarified it will not be listing tariff-related import charges alongside product prices on its website, despite widespread speculation — and a heated reaction from the Trump administration — over reports suggesting otherwise.

Earlier on Tuesday, a report from Punchbowl News claimed Amazon planned to break out tariff costs “right next to” product prices. The news immediately drew fire from the White House, which labeled the rumored move a “hostile and political act.”

Amazon quickly responded, saying no such change was approved or even in the works for the broader platform. According to spokesperson Tim Doyle, only Amazon’s Haul storefront — a low-cost, newly launched platform — briefly considered showing import costs on select items. But the idea never advanced.

“It was never approved and is not going to happen,” Doyle said.

Still, the White House’s initial reaction was swift and sharp. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Amazon of aligning with “a Chinese propaganda arm,” adding political fuel to the economic fire. Reports also indicate that President Trump personally called Amazon founder Jeff Bezos Tuesday morning to express his discontent.

By Tuesday afternoon, the mood had shifted. President Trump praised Bezos in front of reporters before leaving for Michigan, saying, “He solved a problem very quickly and he did the right thing. He’s a good guy.”

Bezos, once part of the elite group seated behind Trump at his inauguration, now finds himself — along with other corporate giants — navigating the unpredictability of ongoing tariff battles that continue to shake global markets.

Economists and business leaders have long warned that Trump’s tariffs, along with retaliation from trade partners like China, could increase everyday prices for consumers and heighten inflation. For companies like Amazon, that’s a balancing act between shielding customers and staying transparent about rising costs.

“Companies are always communicating something with us through receipts,” said Rob Lalka, a professor at Tulane University’s Freeman School of Business. He noted that whether it’s city taxes on hotel stays or local fees in Uber rides, itemized charges aren’t new — and Amazon has used similar approaches before, like listing state sales taxes.

Still, breaking out tariff costs next to each product would have been a bold move — and a highly visible one.

While Amazon distanced itself from the idea, some competitors have already gone there. Chinese-owned Temu and Shein, for example, announced price hikes tied to “recent changes in global trade rules and tariffs.” Temu now includes visible import fees on many listings, while Shein assures customers that tariffs are already baked into the final checkout price.

Some items on Temu have reportedly doubled in cost due to added import charges — unless sourced from local warehouses, which remain tariff-exempt.

Although Amazon denied the rumored pricing change, Lalka believes the idea didn’t come out of nowhere.

“The reality is that politics are always being played,” he said. “And when companies change how prices are displayed, it’s not just business — it’s a message.”

With trade tensions still high and tariff policies shifting, expect more companies to quietly adjust how they pass on those costs — even if it’s not shown front and center in your shopping cart.

Source: CNN – Amazon is not planning to break out tariff costs online as White House attacks potential move

The post Amazon Says No to Displaying Tariff Costs After White House Pushback appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Amazon is exploring whether to display tariff surcharges on ultra-low-cost products sold through its Haul platform—a budget-focused section of its website and app offering items under $20. The potential change, confirmed by Amazon to CNBC, signals a new way the retail giant may respond to increasing trade-related costs.

Haul, Amazon’s answer to fast-growing Chinese discount retailers like Temu and Shein, targets price-conscious shoppers with cheap electronics, clothing, and household items. These competitors have gained massive popularity in the U.S. thanks to their rock-bottom prices—often enabled by trade exemptions and low manufacturing costs.

An Amazon spokesperson clarified that the idea of listing import charges is under consideration only for Haul, not the broader Amazon marketplace. “The team that runs our ultra low cost Amazon Haul store has considered listing import charges on certain products,” the company said. “This was never a consideration for the main Amazon site and nothing has been implemented on any Amazon properties.”

The discussion gained traction after Punchbowl News reported that Amazon would “soon” begin showing tariffs alongside product prices—a move that quickly caught the attention of the White House.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt didn’t hold back, slamming the idea as politically motivated. “Why didn’t Amazon do this when the Biden administration hiked inflation to the highest level in 40 years?” she said, calling the reported plan a “hostile and political act.”

This tariff-related shake-up comes as Amazon and other retailers brace for the impact of new trade policies under former President Donald Trump’s second round of tariffs. Earlier this month, Amazon began surveying its massive third-party seller network to assess how the new tariffs are affecting operations, product sourcing, and logistics. Many sellers are already feeling the pinch—raising prices, trimming marketing budgets, and adjusting their supply chains in response to rising import costs.

If Amazon proceeds with its surcharge display on Haul, it could set a precedent for greater transparency in how trade policies affect everyday prices—and spark new debates over who really bears the cost of global trade.

Source: CNBC – Amazon considers displaying tariff surcharge on low-cost Haul products

The post Amazon May Add Tariff Fees to Ultra-Cheap Haul Products appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Uniqlo is facing growing calls for a boycott in China after its CEO, Tadashi Yanai, stated that the Japanese clothing brand does not source cotton from Xinjiang, a region in northwestern China. This comment comes amid ongoing allegations of forced labor in Xinjiang, where Uyghur and Hui Muslim minorities have been accused of being subjected to human rights abuses by the Chinese government.

In an interview with BBC, Yanai revealed that Uniqlo does not use cotton from Xinjiang. However, he quickly stopped short of elaborating, saying, “By mentioning which cotton we’re using… actually, it gets too political if I say anymore so let’s stop here.”

The comment has sparked outrage in China, with two hashtags related to Yanai’s statement going viral on Weibo, China’s popular social media platform. Many users expressed their anger at Uniqlo, with some vowing to never buy from the brand again. One user posted, “With this kind of attitude from Uniqlo, and their founder being so arrogant, they’re probably betting that mainland consumers will forget about it in a few days and continue to buy. So, can we stand firm this time?” Another user said, “It seems that I will have to stop buying Uniqlo in the future.”

An account on X (formerly Twitter), Shanghai Panda, with over 110,000 followers, urged Chinese consumers to reject Uniqlo, stating, “UNIQLO rejected Xinjiang cotton. Chinese must reject UNIQLO.”

Uniqlo, which is owned by Fast Retailing, has a significant presence in China, a key market for the brand. The company aims to expand its operations in the region, with Yanai mentioning the potential to increase the number of stores from 900 to 3,000 to better serve China’s vast population. Greater China, which includes Taiwan and Hong Kong, already accounts for over 20% of Uniqlo’s revenue.

This is not the first time a global brand has faced backlash in China over Xinjiang cotton. Companies like H&M, Nike, Adidas, and Tommy Hilfiger have all experienced consumer boycotts for pulling products made with Xinjiang cotton amid concerns over forced labor. In response, many of these brands have been hit by sanctions, with Chinese e-commerce platforms removing their stores and map apps removing their locations.

Xinjiang is a major cotton-producing region, known for its high-quality cotton. A 2022 U.S. federal report estimated that Xinjiang produced about 87% of China’s cotton and 23% of the global cotton supply in 2020 and 2021.

As the controversy continues, Uniqlo will likely face increasing pressure to navigate the complex political landscape surrounding Xinjiang cotton and human rights concerns.

Source

The post China Calls for Uniqlo Boycott Following CEO’s Xinjiang Cotton Statement appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.