The case highlights the broad application of Hong Kong’s security legislation, which critics say extends to family members of activists and raises concerns about “transnational repression.” Anna Kwok, executive director of the Washington-based Hong Kong Democracy Council, described her father’s conviction as a “judicial farce” and a form of guilt by association.

Authorities had previously offered a reward of 1 million Hong Kong dollars (about $127,900) for information leading to Anna Kwok’s arrest and prohibited anyone from managing her funds. She is among 34 individuals targeted in a wider crackdown following the 2019 anti-government protests, accused of soliciting foreign sanctions and engaging in activities deemed hostile to China and Hong Kong.

Background of the Case

The dispute centered on an insurance policy Kwok Yin-sang purchased for his daughter when she was a child. She assumed control of the policy at 18, and in 2025 her father attempted to terminate it and withdraw approximately $11,000. Hong Kong authorities charged him under the national security law for dealing with assets belonging to an “absconder.”

Acting principal magistrate Cheng Lim-chi sentenced Kwok to eight months, noting that while his actions did not directly threaten national security, they could discourage his daughter from returning to Hong Kong. The court rejected arguments for a lighter sentence, including his lawyer’s request for a 14-day term, citing no evidence that funds would be sent to Anna Kwok. The charge carries a maximum of seven years, though magistrates’ courts typically impose sentences under two years.

International Reactions

The sentence drew condemnation from U.S. lawmakers. Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon called the conviction “cruel” and criticized it as part of Beijing’s cross-border effort to silence dissent. “Mr. Kwok was put on trial because his daughter spoke out against Beijing’s abuse of Hong Kongers’ rights,” Merkley said.

Hong Kong authorities have also issued bounties for other overseas-based activists, including former lawmakers Nathan Law and Ted Hui. Both the U.S. and the U.K. governments have publicly condemned these actions, viewing them as a threat to freedom of expression and political dissent.

In 2025, the U.S. sanctioned six Hong Kong and Chinese officials for acts of “transnational repression,” prompting Beijing to retaliate with its own sanctions on U.S. lawmakers and NGO leaders. Hong Kong and Chinese authorities maintain that these laws are essential for the city’s stability and security.

Wider Context

The case underscores the reach of Hong Kong’s 2024 national security law, locally known as Article 23 legislation, and the 2020 Beijing-imposed law. Legal analysts note that extending penalties to relatives of activists abroad represents a significant expansion of the law’s scope, raising concerns among international human rights organizations and foreign governments.

Anna Kwok called the ruling “guilt by blood” and said it represents a form of “hostage taking” to pressure dissidents overseas. The decision adds to ongoing debates over the legality and ethics of applying national security measures to family members of activists living outside Hong Kong.

Source: AP News – The father of a US-based Hong Kong activist is sentenced to 8 months under national security law

The post Hong Kong Court Sentences Father of U.S.-Based Activist Under National Security Law appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Thailand has taken a significant step in loosening long-standing rules about students’ appearances, with the country’s highest administrative court striking down a directive that required strict hair regulations for students, in place since 1975. This marks a major victory for students and activists who have campaigned for greater personal freedom in schools.

A Rigid Tradition Comes to an End

For decades, Thai students, especially boys, were required to maintain an army-style crew cut, while girls had to sport short, ear-length bobs. The rules were enforced so strictly that even a few centimeters over the limit could result in embarrassing punishment. Students faced severe consequences for any deviation from the set standards, with some even subjected to public humiliation.

One such student, Khao Klong (now 20, studying at university), remembers the shame of being singled out for his hair being “too long” in high school. “It made me feel insecure, like I was being made into a joke,” he recalls of the day he was forced to have his hair shaved in front of the entire school.

A Turning Point: Court Ruling and Public Outcry

The oppressive hairstyle rule has been an emblem of Thailand’s conservative, hierarchical culture — and its military-influenced education system. But in March, after decades of protests and complaints from students, the administrative court ruled that these regulations were unconstitutional. The court stated that they “imposed excessive restrictions on personal freedom” and violated the Thai Constitution. Moreover, the ruling emphasized the negative impact such policies had on students’ mental health, particularly those with diverse gender identities.

This decision followed the country’s student-led protests in 2020, which called for more personal freedoms in schools, including the right to express themselves through their appearances. These protests were part of a larger movement that challenged Thailand’s military-backed government and its rigid norms.

Changing Times, Changing Rules

The court’s decision is being welcomed by many students, including 16-year-old Nijchaya Kraisriwattana, who remembers the stress of weekly hair checks. “We used to have academic points deducted for minor things like my hair being a little too long,” she says. But now, the rules feel “more relaxed,” she notes.

However, not all students are convinced that real change is happening. Some worry that individual schools will still impose harsh rules despite the court ruling, leaving students with little recourse. Khao Klong, who once led protests for student rights, points out that the battle isn’t over just because the law has changed. “We haven’t seen much change yet,” he says.

A Glimpse of the Past: Military Influence and Conformity

The strict dress codes were a reflection of Thailand’s long-standing military influence and its desire to cultivate disciplined, obedient citizens. The rules were implemented during a military dictatorship in the 1970s, a time when authoritarianism shaped much of Thailand’s social and political systems.

For years, this rigid structure has extended beyond haircuts, enforcing strict uniform requirements — even down to the exact type of socks students could wear. Khao Klong remembers how teachers would beat students for perceived “discipline” issues, a practice that was widespread in his school years.

Despite protests in 2013 that slightly relaxed the rules, the dress code remained a hotly contested issue until 2020, when student-led movements called for broader reforms to the education system. These protests were influenced by the larger pro-democracy movement that challenged the military-drafted constitution and called for more freedoms.

Student Activism and the Road Ahead

During these protests, students adopted symbols of resistance, including the three-finger salute made famous by the Hunger Games films, to show their defiance. One striking moment came when students shaved their heads in protest, as a symbol of rejecting outdated norms.

Now, with the court ruling officially declaring the hairstyle rules unconstitutional, activists like Khao Klong are hopeful that the push for more student rights will gain further momentum. However, he and others stress that the real work lies in ensuring that schools respect this newfound freedom and allow students to shape their own identities without fear of punishment.

Khao Klong’s activism was sparked by his own painful experience of being publicly humiliated, but he remains determined to keep fighting for students’ rights to this day. “We haven’t stopped fighting for freedom, we’ve just been distracted by life,” he says. “The memory of that feeling of being oppressed still lingers, and we won’t forget it.”

Looking Forward

While the court ruling is a significant step forward, educational experts like Thunhavich Thitiratsakul caution that change must be implemented carefully. Schools now need to engage with communities and reconsider their rules. But the question remains: Will students have a seat at the table?

As this issue continues to unfold, many students like Nijchaya hope for even greater freedoms, like the ability to wear T-shirts and jeans. “Yes, absolutely,” she says when asked if she wants more freedom in her clothing. The struggle for personal expression and freedom continues, but Thailand’s students have now taken a bold step toward rewriting the rules.

Source: – After 50 years, Thailand finally strikes down strict rules on students’ hair lengths

The post After Decades, Thailand Loosens Hair Regulations for Students appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Four prominent pro-democracy activists were released from prison in Hong Kong on Tuesday, marking the first wave of releases in the city’s largest-ever national security trial. Their freedom comes after spending more than four years in custody on subversion charges tied to an unofficial primary election in 2020.

Former lawmakers Claudia Mo, Kwok Ka-ki, Jeremy Tam, and Gary Fan were quietly released in the early morning hours from three separate correctional facilities across the city. Police maintained a heavy presence, blocking off roads and stationing officers near prison entrances to limit media access.

Vehicles were seen exiting the maximum-security Stanley Prison, where Kwok and Tam had been held. Claudia Mo was released from a women’s correctional facility in Lo Wu, while Fan was freed from Shek Pik Prison on Lantau Island.

Speaking briefly to reporters outside his home, Fan said, “I will go back home and reunite with family. Thank you Hong Kongers.”

Mo’s husband, veteran journalist Philip Bowring, told local media that she returned home calmly and was in need of rest.

The four were among 47 pro-democracy figures arrested in early 2021 and charged under a sweeping national security law imposed by Beijing. They were accused of conspiring to commit subversion by organizing an informal primary election in 2020 to select candidates for the Legislative Council. Prosecutors argued that the plan was to gain a majority and potentially disrupt government operations—an act viewed as a threat to state power.

While all four pleaded guilty, they were denied bail and held in custody for nearly two years before the trial began in 2023. In total, 45 of the 47 were convicted, with sentences reaching up to 10 years. Only two were acquitted.

Mo, Kwok, and Tam were former members of the now-defunct Civic Party, once a major force in Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement. The party was dissolved in early 2024 amid an intensifying crackdown. Claudia Mo had left the party earlier, co-founding the localist group HK First with Gary Fan, who belonged to the Neo Democrats.

The trial drew widespread condemnation from Western governments, including the United States, which called it politically driven and urged the release of those detained. Beijing and Hong Kong authorities maintain that the defendants were treated equally under the law and that justice was served.

The mass arrests and lengthy trial were part of a broader effort by Beijing to stamp out dissent following the massive 2019 protests that rocked the city. In the years since, the national security law has been used to silence opposition voices, shutter independent media outlets, and dismantle civil society.

Tuesday’s releases may mark the end of a chapter for these four individuals—but for Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement, the road ahead remains uncertain.

Source: CNN – First batch of Hong Kong democrats freed after four years’ prison for subversion

The post First Activists Released in Hong Kong’s Landmark Subversion Case appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Jimmy Lai, a prominent pro-democracy advocate and founder of the now-shuttered Hong Kong tabloid Apple Daily, took the stand on Wednesday in a closely watched national security trial. The 76-year-old media tycoon faces charges of colluding with foreign forces, accusations tied to his use of the media outlet to challenge the government.

If convicted, Lai could face life imprisonment. This trial marks the first time Lai has testified in court, despite enduring multiple legal proceedings since 2020. Observers widely view these cases as politically driven, coinciding with Beijing’s increasing control over Hong Kong.

In his testimony, Lai defended the mission of Apple Daily, describing it as a reflection of Hong Kong’s core values. He stated the publication stood for “freedom [and the] pursuit of democracy,” ideals that have become increasingly contentious in the city under the national security law.

Lai’s trial has drawn international attention, symbolizing the broader erosion of press freedom and democratic values in Hong Kong.

Source

The post Jimmy Lai Defends Freedom and Democracy in High-Stakes Hong Kong Trial appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.