During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump made a bold promise: “We will build American, buy American, and hire American.” However, a recent review of government labor data reveals a discrepancy between his pledge and the hiring practices of his own businesses.

Despite championing American workers, Trump’s businesses—such as the Mar-a-Lago Club, his golf courses, and a Virginia winery—have significantly increased their use of foreign guest workers, reaching record numbers in 2024. This year, Trump’s companies were granted approval to hire 209 foreign workers, nearly double the number from a decade ago.

These guest workers, who include cooks, housekeepers, servers, and desk clerks, are employed through the H-2B visa program, which allows businesses to hire temporary foreign labor when there are insufficient American workers available for the roles.

The Push for Foreign Workers

Trump has argued that the seasonal nature of his properties requires temporary workers, jobs that Americans often do not want. However, some former employees of Trump’s clubs suggest that raising wages or offering additional perks could attract more domestic workers.

Similarly, prominent figures connected to Trump, such as Elon Musk, have also sought foreign workers for their businesses. Musk’s companies, including Tesla and Neuralink, have requested thousands of foreign workers in 2024 alone.

Critics of the H-2B Visa Program

Some critics argue that foreign guest-worker programs, like the H-2B, can harm American workers’ bargaining power. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, suggests that these programs give businesses an easy way to avoid offering higher wages or improving working conditions. While he doesn’t fault individual businesses like Trump’s for utilizing the program, he questions whether such visa programs should exist at all.

Krikorian argues that the hospitality industry could adapt by creating programs that attract American workers from areas with fewer seasonal job opportunities, perhaps offering incentives like free airfare or lodging.

The Need for Immigrant Labor in Certain Sectors

Despite these concerns, some experts point out the critical role of foreign-born workers in certain sectors of the economy. In South Florida, where Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club is located, businesses often rely on guest workers to meet the demands of the bustling tourist and seasonal population. Julia Dattolo, CEO of CareerSource Palm Beach County, notes that many local businesses face challenges filling jobs, especially with low unemployment and high living costs.

Chloe East, an associate professor of economics at the University of Colorado Denver, suggests that while Trump has criticized immigration, he also relies on foreign workers for his businesses. She points out that immigrants play an essential role in many industries, and changes to guest-worker programs could have negative consequences for US businesses.

Trump’s History with Foreign Workers

Trump’s companies have a long history of using foreign guest workers. Since 2008, the Trump Organization has hired over 2,100 foreign workers through the H-2B program, with numbers steadily increasing each year. In 2008, Trump’s companies hired about 100 foreign workers, and by recent years, that number has topped 200 annually.

The positions offered through the program, such as bartenders and servers at Mar-a-Lago, pay modest wages, typically around $16 an hour, with eligibility for overtime, raises, and bonuses. These roles also require background checks, drug tests, and proficiency in English.

The Growing Debate

While Trump’s businesses continue to hire foreign guest workers, the future of such programs is a hot topic of debate. Some of Trump’s political allies, including those involved in the creation of Project 2025, have called for scaling back the H-2B program to prioritize American workers. Trump distanced himself from this proposal during his campaign but later selected a co-author of the plan to lead the Office of Management and Budget.

As the debate over immigration and labor continues, it remains to be seen how Trump’s policies will balance the interests of American workers with the practical demands of seasonal industries that rely on foreign labor.

Source

The post Trump Vows to Hire American, But His Businesses Hire More Foreign Workers appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Many U.S. politicians advocating for a TikTok ban due to national security concerns still actively use the platform to connect with voters, highlighting a stark contradiction in their actions and rhetoric.

TikTok as a Campaign Tool

According to an analysis by NBC News, at least 49 members of Congress, five officials in President Joe Biden’s administration, and President-elect Donald Trump have verified TikTok accounts. Notably, 23 of these Congress members voted for legislation supporting a potential TikTok ban. Despite this, they used the platform extensively to campaign, share their beliefs, and shape their public personas.

The widespread use of TikTok among politicians, even those advocating against it, underscores the platform’s unparalleled reach. For many Americans, TikTok has become a primary source of information, making it an indispensable tool for political campaigns.

TikTok’s Unique Appeal to Politicians

Cheyenne Hunt, a former Democratic congressional candidate and advocate for tech regulation, described the political use of TikTok as “an interesting balance.” She explained that politicians are drawn to the platform’s unique algorithm, which allows them to reach millions of viewers organically without paid promotion or pre-existing popularity.

“Increasingly, TikTok is the main source of news for most Americans,” Hunt said. “It’s where people are, and it’s where they’re engaged.”

However, Hunt cautions against targeting TikTok exclusively. She argues that other tech giants, such as Meta, pose similar privacy and security concerns, yet receive less scrutiny.

Trump and Biden: TikTok Campaigns

Donald Trump, who sought to ban TikTok in 2020, launched his official TikTok account in June 2024 as part of his presidential campaign. He quickly amassed 14.6 million followers, making him the most-followed U.S. politician on the platform. His content, which includes rally clips, voter interactions, and collaborations with influencers, consistently receives high engagement and positive feedback.

In contrast, President Biden joined TikTok in February 2024 for campaign purposes but faced criticism for his apparent inconsistency. While his administration worked to enforce a potential sale of TikTok to an American company, Biden’s TikTok account remained active, later supporting Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign.

Conflicting Positions and Public Perception

Trump’s embrace of TikTok marked a reversal of his earlier stance. However, because he adopted the platform after leaving office, his shift appears more organic. Biden and Harris, on the other hand, continued to oppose TikTok’s Chinese ownership even as they used it to campaign, leading to accusations of hypocrisy.

“The hypocrisy is stark,” Hunt said. “They’ve called TikTok a national security threat, yet they rely on it to reach voters.”

TikTok’s Role in Congress

More than 20 members of Congress who voted for a TikTok ban still maintain active accounts. For instance, Rep. Jeff Jackson of North Carolina, who has 2.2 million followers, apologized to his audience for supporting the ban. He explained that classified briefings revealed “genuinely alarming” information about TikTok. However, his continued use of the platform helped him connect with voters and ultimately win his bid for North Carolina Attorney General.

Similarly, other representatives, such as Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, keep their TikTok accounts active primarily to prevent impersonators, even if they no longer post due to security concerns.

The Senate: Party-Line Voting and TikTok Use

In April 2024, the Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of legislation requiring TikTok’s sale, with 79 supporting the measure and 18 opposing it. Among those who voted for the legislation were Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey and Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia, both of whom have large TikTok followings. Booker continues to use TikTok to campaign and support Democratic efforts, while Ossoff has been inactive since 2021.

On the opposing side, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who has the largest TikTok following in the Senate at 1.5 million, voted against the bill. His account focuses on high-quality videos of speeches and interactions with constituents.

The Bigger Picture: Tech Policy vs. Political Convenience

Despite the ongoing debate over TikTok’s future in the U.S., the platform remains a vital tool for politicians to connect with voters. Hunt argues that the focus should shift from banning individual platforms to passing comprehensive tech regulation.

“Until we stand up to big tech lobbies and create strong data privacy laws, we’re not truly addressing the issue,” Hunt said. “Targeting individual apps instead of implementing broad consumer protections leaves us vulnerable.”

Conclusion

TikTok’s influence on American politics is undeniable. Politicians across the aisle, even those advocating for its ban, continue to rely on its massive reach to engage voters and shape their campaigns. This contradiction highlights the complex relationship between modern technology and political strategy.

Source

The post The TikTok Dilemma: Campaigning on an App They Want to Ban appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.