The United Nations Security Council has approved a U.S.-backed plan that outlines Gaza’s next steps after more than two years of conflict. The resolution authorizes an international force, a transitional administration, and a possible route toward Palestinian self-determination. The vote also strengthens U.S. diplomatic efforts as regional talks continue.

Background and Global Significance

The Security Council endorsed the Trump administration’s proposal with a 13–0 vote. Russia and China abstained, but they did not block the measure. The decision gives the plan broad international support after months of negotiations between Washington and regional partners.

U.S. officials said the resolution marks an important moment for Gaza’s future. Many Middle Eastern diplomats agreed. They stressed that UN approval was essential, since countries considering troop contributions wanted a clear legal mandate.

The plan comes after years of intense fighting that destroyed Gaza’s infrastructure and displaced large parts of the population. It also deepened political tensions across the region.

Key Parts of the U.S. Plan

The resolution authorizes an international stabilization force. It will secure Gaza, manage border zones, and oversee the demilitarization of non-state armed groups. The mandate runs through the end of 2027.

A new Board of Peace will serve as a transitional governing authority. Under the plan, U.S. President Donald Trump will oversee the board. This structure places Washington at the center of Gaza’s political transition.

The stabilization force can “use all necessary measures” to fulfill its duties. This phrase signals approval for military force under UN standards. The force will also train and support a Palestinian police unit responsible for local security.

Coordination with Egypt and Israel is required. Both countries play major roles in border management and humanitarian access, which makes their cooperation essential for the plan’s success.

Regional Support From Arab and Muslim Nations

Many Arab and Muslim states backed the proposal. The U.S. issued a joint statement with Qatar, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Indonesia, Pakistan, Jordan, and Turkey. These countries called for a quick vote and said they would consider contributing to the force once UN approval was secured.

Several of these nations had made UN authorization a condition for joining any security mission in Gaza. Their involvement is seen as important for legitimacy and trust across the region.

The vote also comes during a fragile ceasefire. Diplomats hope the resolution will help maintain calm and build a foundation for longer-term stability.

Conditional Pathway to Palestinian Statehood

Debates during the negotiations focused heavily on Palestinian self-determination. Arab states and Palestinian officials pushed for stronger language. As talks progressed, U.S. diplomats agreed to adjust the text.

The final resolution mentions a possible path to Palestinian independence. However, it does not set a timeline. It states that progress in reconstruction and reforms within the Palestinian Authority could “finally” create conditions for a credible route to statehood.

The plan also directs Washington to open a dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians. The goal is to outline a political vision for peaceful coexistence.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu repeated his opposition to Palestinian statehood. His coalition partners voiced similar concerns and warned that the resolution might increase pressure for a two-state solution.

Humanitarian and Regional Realities

The vote took place as the ceasefire continued after more than two years of war. The conflict began after Hamas carried out an attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel reported that the assault killed about 1,200 people.

Israel’s military response caused severe destruction across Gaza. The Gaza health ministry says more than 69,000 Palestinians have died. The total includes both civilians and combatants, though the ministry reports that most victims are women and children.

Much of Gaza’s infrastructure remains in ruins. International agencies report ongoing shortages of medicine, food, and clean water. The resolution instructs the stabilization force to work closely with humanitarian organizations to improve aid delivery.

The Challenge of Demilitarization

Demilitarization remains one of the most difficult tasks. The stabilization force must oversee the dismantling of weapons held by non-state armed groups. Hamas has not formally agreed to this requirement, which raises serious concerns.

Regional observers warn that disarmament will face obstacles without broad political support. They also note that the process may take years, not months.

Israeli forces are expected to withdraw as stability improves. The timeline depends on several conditions, including progress on demilitarization. The stabilization force, Israel, the U.S., and the guarantors of the ceasefire must all agree on the benchmarks.

U.S. Messaging After the Vote

U.S. Ambassador Mike Waltz called the vote “historic and constructive.” He said the resolution marks the start of a new chapter for Gaza and the wider Middle East. Waltz also emphasized that the decision represents the beginning of a long, complex process.

President Trump praised the vote on social media. He called it one of the most significant approvals in UN history and said the decision would help strengthen global peace.

Diplomats across the region warned that implementation will not be easy. They expect political challenges, logistical difficulties, and disagreements between major stakeholders.

What Comes Next

The next phase focuses on deploying the stabilization force and forming the Board of Peace. Regional countries must decide how many troops they can provide. The UN will also outline rules, coordination structures, and timelines.

The resolution shows strong international support for a U.S.-led effort to rebuild Gaza and guide its political transition. Whether the plan produces long-term peace will depend on political cooperation, security conditions, and humanitarian progress.

Source: AP News – UN approves the Trump administration plan for Gaza’s future

The post UN Backs U.S. Plan for Gaza Governance and Stabilization After Two Years of War appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: September 24, 2025, 14:00 EDT

At a special United Nations Security Council meeting this week, the United States once again found itself at odds with much of the world over how to address the war in Gaza and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While most nations pushed for an immediate ceasefire, humanitarian relief, and recognition of Palestinian statehood, Washington continued to shield Israel from international pressure.

The session underscored a widening divide between the U.S. and its allies on the global stage, highlighting growing frustration with the use of American veto power to block ceasefire resolutions.

International Calls for Ceasefire

Delegates from across the globe condemned the ongoing war in Gaza, which began after Hamas’ attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The conflict has since killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, displaced nearly 90% of the population, and left much of the territory in ruins.

Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar described Gaza as “a graveyard for humanity as well as for the global conscience,” urging immediate international action to halt the violence. Many representatives echoed his call for a ceasefire and increased humanitarian assistance, warning of the dire consequences of continued inaction.

Despite near-unanimous support, the United States has repeatedly blocked efforts to adopt such measures. Washington argues that recent resolutions have failed to adequately condemn Hamas and insists the focus should remain on dismantling the group.

U.S. Position and Veto Power

The United States remains firm in its position, citing security concerns and the need to maintain pressure on Hamas. Last week, the U.S. was the only country to vote against a ceasefire resolution supported by all 14 other Security Council members.

American officials also oppose recent moves by France and other nations to recognize Palestinian statehood, arguing that recognition should come only as part of a negotiated peace agreement. As a permanent member of the Security Council, the U.S. holds veto power, effectively blocking any path toward full Palestinian membership at the U.N.

This stance has left Washington increasingly isolated, even among long-standing allies, many of whom are pressing for a two-state solution to end the cycle of violence.

Mounting Global Frustration

Since the start of the Gaza war, the Security Council has convened more than 80 times to debate ceasefire proposals, yet progress remains stalled. Both the Biden and Trump administrations have exercised veto power, drawing criticism from diplomats who question the council’s credibility if one permanent member can consistently block initiatives supported by the majority.

Diplomatic frustration was evident in speeches from European leaders. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen stressed that ending the war in Gaza should be the “bare minimum” expected of the Security Council. “Last week, 14 members of this council were willing to do this. We hope that this can soon become all 15,” he said.

The Absent Players

Israel was notably absent from the session due to the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah. The U.S., meanwhile, sent its ambassador to represent the delegation instead of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is in New York for high-level meetings.

U.S. Ambassador Mike Waltz criticized the timing of the meeting, calling it “regrettable” and accusing other members of using the council to “reward Hamas for refusing to surrender.” He argued that international backing for Palestinian demands has hindered ceasefire negotiations, blaming outside pressure rather than recent Israeli military actions.

Israeli Government Response

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has indicated that his government may respond to international recognition of Palestinian statehood with unilateral measures, such as annexing parts of the West Bank. Netanyahu is expected to outline his plans during his upcoming visit to Washington, his fourth meeting with President Donald Trump since Trump’s return to office.

Israel maintains that its military campaign in Gaza is aimed at dismantling Hamas and ensuring national security. However, critics warn that the scale of destruction and civilian casualties risks fueling long-term instability and undermining prospects for peace.

Broader Diplomatic Context

The Gaza conflict has overshadowed nearly every other issue at the United Nations General Assembly this year. Leaders from Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America have used speeches and bilateral meetings to highlight the humanitarian crisis and call for accountability.

With mounting casualties, growing hunger, and displacement at unprecedented levels, momentum for international action appears to be building. Yet the persistent U.S. veto continues to stall concrete progress at the Security Council, raising doubts about the institution’s ability to deliver on its mandate of maintaining global peace and security.

Conclusion

The latest Security Council session highlighted the deepening rift between the United States and much of the international community over Gaza. While most nations demand an immediate ceasefire and steps toward Palestinian statehood, Washington’s refusal to shift its stance leaves the U.N. gridlocked.

As global frustration grows, the question remains whether international pressure can break the deadlock — or whether U.S. policy will continue to shield Israel from accountability despite near-universal calls for action.

Source: AP News –UN Security Council meeting on Gaza highlights growing isolation of US on Mideast conflict

The post U.N. Security Council Debate Exposes U.S. Isolation on Gaza War appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published Time: 08-20-2025, 15:45

Israel has granted final approval for a settlement project in the occupied West Bank that critics say could effectively divide the territory and undermine the possibility of a future Palestinian state. The move, centered on an area known as E1 east of Jerusalem, has drawn strong objections from Palestinians, human rights groups, and much of the international community.

E1 Project Approved After Two Decades of Debate

The settlement plan for E1, a stretch of land between Jerusalem and the large West Bank settlement of Maale Adumim, has been under consideration for more than 20 years. Previous Israeli governments had suspended the project in response to U.S. pressure and international opposition.

The proposal envisions around 3,500 new housing units. Israeli officials have suggested that infrastructure work could begin in the coming months, with construction possibly starting within a year.

Critics argue that building in E1 would sever the territorial continuity of the West Bank, leaving Palestinian cities like Ramallah in the north and Bethlehem in the south disconnected. This, they warn, would make it nearly impossible to establish a viable Palestinian state.

Government Justification and Political Context

Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a former settler leader who has significant influence over settlement policy, framed the approval as a deliberate rejection of recent European initiatives to recognize a Palestinian state.

“The Palestinian state is being erased from the table not with slogans but with actions,” Smotrich said on Wednesday. “Every settlement, every neighborhood, every housing unit is another nail in the coffin of this dangerous idea.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has consistently rejected the two-state solution, pledging that Israel will maintain permanent control over the West Bank, annexed East Jerusalem, and Gaza. These territories, captured by Israel during the 1967 Middle East war, are claimed by Palestinians as the foundation of a future independent state.

International and Palestinian Reactions

The international community, including the United Nations and the European Union, has long regarded settlement construction in the West Bank as illegal under international law and a direct obstacle to peace. While formal statements regarding the latest approval are still forthcoming, diplomatic observers expect renewed criticism and possible calls for restraint.

Palestinian groups say the E1 project is a clear attempt to prevent statehood. Peace Now, an Israeli organization monitoring settlement expansion, issued a sharp rebuke.

“The settlement in E1 has no purpose other than to sabotage a political solution,” the group said in a statement. “While the consensus among our friends in the world is to strive for peace and a two-state solution, a government that long ago lost the people’s trust is undermining the national interest, and we are all paying the price.”

Impact on Palestinian Movement and Daily Life

The E1 area is seen as a crucial geographic corridor. Ramallah and Bethlehem, the two major Palestinian cities it would connect, are only about 22 kilometers (14 miles) apart. However, due to existing checkpoints and Israeli road systems, Palestinians must already take lengthy detours that often stretch travel into several hours.

A developed settlement in E1 would further limit movement and deepen reliance on Israeli-controlled routes, according to Palestinian officials and advocacy groups. Many fear it could lead to more displacement, tighter restrictions, and increased friction between settlers and local Palestinian communities.

Rising Tensions in the West Bank

The approval comes amid heightened instability across the West Bank. Reports of settler violence, evictions of Palestinian families, and near-daily Israeli military operations have surged in recent months. Palestinian attacks on Israelis have also occurred, contributing to a climate of fear and retaliation.

More than 700,000 Israelis now live in settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The growing settler population, combined with government-backed expansion, has intensified disputes over land, security, and the long-term prospects for peace.

Broader Settlement Expansion

In addition to the E1 approval, Israeli authorities also cleared the construction of 350 homes in the settlement of Ashael, located near Hebron. Smotrich hailed both decisions as evidence of what he described as a strategic commitment to expand Jewish communities across the West Bank.

Israel’s governing coalition, heavily influenced by religious and ultranationalist factions, has placed settlement growth at the center of its political agenda. Smotrich has publicly pledged to double the number of settlers in the West Bank, reinforcing the perception among critics that the government is entrenching permanent control over disputed land.

Outlook and Global Ramifications

The E1 project is expected to remain a major flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. If construction proceeds as planned, it will likely face legal challenges, international pressure, and possible protests on the ground.

Diplomats and analysts warn that the project could strain Israel’s relations with Western allies, many of whom continue to advocate for negotiations toward a two-state solution. For Palestinians, the settlement represents what they see as the closing of one of the last doors to statehood.

As global attention remains heavily focused on the war in Gaza, rights groups argue that developments in the West Bank risk being overshadowed. Yet the approval of E1 underscores how settlement expansion continues to shape the future of the conflict and the prospects for peace.

Source: AP News – Israel approves settlement project that could divide the West Bank

The post Israel Approves Controversial West Bank Settlement Project appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published Time: 08-14-2025, 16:45

Israel has announced plans to advance a major settlement project in the occupied West Bank, drawing strong criticism from Palestinian leaders, rights groups, and international observers. The proposed development in the E1 area, east of Jerusalem, has been on hold for decades but is now being fast-tracked, prompting warnings that it could split the West Bank and jeopardize the creation of a future Palestinian state.

E1 Settlement Project Gains Momentum

On Thursday, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich confirmed the government’s intention to move forward with the E1 settlement plan. The project would expand the settlement of Maale Adumim by adding roughly 3,500 housing units.

Smotrich hailed the decision as a decisive move to strengthen Israel’s territorial control, stating:

“This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognize and no one to recognize. Anyone in the world who tries today to recognize a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground.”

The E1 project has been under discussion for more than two decades but faced repeated delays due to international opposition, particularly from the United States. Previous U.S. administrations urged Israel to halt construction in the area, warning that it could undermine peace negotiations.

Smotrich expressed gratitude to former U.S. President Donald Trump and former U.S. ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, calling them “true friends of Israel as we have never had before.”

Final Approval Expected Soon

While the plan has not yet received its final governmental authorization, approval is anticipated next week. If the remaining bureaucratic steps proceed without delay, infrastructure work could begin within months, with home construction potentially starting in about a year.

The E1 area is considered highly strategic by both Israelis and Palestinians. For Israel, it provides territorial continuity between Jerusalem and Maale Adumim. For Palestinians, the development could cut off the northern and southern parts of the West Bank, making a contiguous Palestinian state significantly harder to achieve.

Rights Groups Warn of Long-Term Impact

Israeli rights organization Peace Now sharply criticized the move, warning it would have severe consequences for both sides. In a statement, the group said the project was “deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution,” adding that it would “guarantee many more years of bloodshed.”

Palestinian officials echoed these concerns, saying the settlement expansion directly undermines peace prospects and violates international law.

International Reactions and Palestinian Response

The announcement comes as multiple countries prepare to recognize a Palestinian state in September. The Palestinian Authority has condemned the decision, calling it a deliberate attempt to block diplomatic progress.

Arab states also voiced opposition, with regional leaders stressing that unilateral settlement expansion would escalate tensions and further complicate negotiations.

Netanyahu’s ‘Greater Israel’ Remarks Stir Debate

The settlement decision follows comments earlier this week by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who expressed strong personal attachment to the vision of a “Greater Israel.” While he did not provide specifics, proponents of the idea advocate for Israeli control over the occupied West Bank and, in some interpretations, parts of neighboring Arab territories.

Palestinian and Arab leaders view such statements as incompatible with the two-state framework supported by much of the international community.

A Critical Moment for Regional Diplomacy

With final approval of the E1 settlement plan likely within days, diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions face a challenging path. The project’s advancement underscores deep divisions between Israel and the Palestinians over territory, sovereignty, and the future of peace negotiations.

Whether the plan proceeds as anticipated could shape the political and security landscape of the region for years to come. As September approaches, when more nations are expected to officially recognize Palestinian statehood, the stakes for both sides continue to rise.

Source: AP News – Israel announces West Bank settlement that rights groups say could imperil Palestinian state

The post Israel Moves Forward with West Bank Settlement Plan Amid International Concerns appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Writing time: July 31, 2025, 16:00 (U.S. Eastern Time)

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has raised concerns over Canada’s recognition of a Palestinian state, saying it could jeopardize ongoing trade negotiations. In a social media post, Trump suggested that Canada’s diplomatic decision may complicate efforts to finalize a trade agreement, intensifying tensions between the two allies.

Trump ties Canadian foreign policy to trade pressure

In a message posted Thursday on his platform Truth Social, Trump criticized Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent announcement supporting Palestinian statehood. “Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,” Trump wrote. “That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh’ Canada!!!”

The remarks signal an unusual linkage between foreign policy decisions and trade negotiations. Trump has frequently used tariffs and trade threats as political tools, but experts say tying diplomatic recognition of a foreign state to trade penalties is rare and contentious.

Tariff threats ahead of trade deadline

Trump reiterated a prior threat to impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports if an agreement is not reached by Friday. This deadline, self-imposed by Trump as part of his broader trade agenda, would affect dozens of U.S. trading partners, including Canada.

While some Canadian goods remain shielded under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), that agreement is due for renegotiation in 2026. Trump has signaled dissatisfaction with certain terms and hinted at revisions if he returns to office.

A spokesperson for Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney declined to comment on the former president’s statements.

Global recognition of Palestine grows

Canada’s decision to recognize Palestinian statehood follows similar moves by France and the United Kingdom. French President Emmanuel Macron recently expressed support for a two-state solution, while British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans to recognize Palestine by September—conditional on an Israeli ceasefire in Gaza and steps toward peace.

Despite this trend among Western allies, Trump’s position has remained ambiguous. Earlier this week, he told reporters he had “no position” on Palestinian recognition, though he later stated that doing so would be “rewarding Hamas,” referencing the October 7, 2023, attack by the group that triggered Israel’s military response.

The Biden administration, by contrast, has maintained cautious support for a two-state solution while calling for de-escalation in Gaza.

Trump mixes foreign policy with economic retaliation

The trade threat against Canada comes on the heels of Trump’s attempt to penalize Brazil after former President Jair Bolsonaro—an ideological ally—was indicted. Trump had previously warned of tariffs on Brazilian goods as retaliation for what he characterized as politically motivated legal actions against Bolsonaro.

This pattern reflects Trump’s broader approach to trade as a tool for exerting influence across foreign policy, domestic politics, and international diplomacy. In past months, he has cited reasons ranging from human trafficking and fentanyl control to budget balancing as justifications for new tariffs.

Analysts question strategy

Trade analysts and former diplomats say the Trump approach risks complicating bilateral negotiations and diminishing the credibility of U.S. economic diplomacy.

“Using trade as leverage for foreign policy positions is not unprecedented, but doing so this bluntly—especially in response to symbolic recognition—is unusual,” said Jennifer Blackstone, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Trade Studies. “It could set a precedent that encourages further fragmentation in international trade norms.”

Canada’s move, though largely symbolic, signals a broader global shift in sentiment toward Israel’s military operations in Gaza. As civilian casualties mount and humanitarian concerns grow, more nations are reconsidering their stance on Palestinian sovereignty.

Domestic and international implications

For Trump, the issue also intersects with campaign messaging ahead of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Presenting himself as a tough negotiator and defender of U.S. interests, Trump has used trade and tariffs to rally political support, especially among American manufacturers and nationalist voters.

However, critics argue that linking economic decisions to unrelated foreign policy disputes—such as Canada’s recognition of Palestine—risks undermining strategic partnerships.

Meanwhile, Canada’s position aligns with a growing bloc of nations advocating for Palestinian statehood as part of a long-term peace framework. The move reflects growing international frustration over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the lack of progress on Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

What’s next for U.S.-Canada trade?

As of now, no formal renegotiation of the USMCA has begun, and Carney’s government has not responded publicly to Trump’s threats. The situation remains fluid, with Friday’s trade deadline looming and broader geopolitical tensions simmering.

If the former president follows through on his tariff threats, economic impacts could be felt on both sides of the border. Canada remains one of the United States’ largest trading partners, and any escalation in trade disputes could affect industries ranging from agriculture and energy to technology and automotive exports.

Source: AP News – Trump seeks to use Canada’s recognition of Palestinian state as leverage in trade talks

The post Trump links Canada’s Palestinian state recognition to trade deal threats appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

July 25, 2025 – 9:16 AM

French President Emmanuel Macron has announced that France will officially recognize Palestine as a sovereign state at the United Nations General Assembly this September. The decision marks a major shift in Western policy, as global concern grows over the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

What happened

On Thursday, July 24, Macron posted on X (formerly Twitter) that France will recognize Palestinian statehood at the upcoming U.N. meeting.

“The urgent thing today is that the war in Gaza stops and the civilian population is saved,” Macron wrote.

His announcement comes amid rising international frustration over civilian deaths, starvation, and Israel’s continued blockade of Gaza. More than 140 countries have already recognized Palestine, but France would be the most influential Western power to do so formally.

Why this matters now

The Gaza war has created a growing humanitarian disaster, with thousands of Palestinians cut off from food, water, and medical aid. Macron’s move could help break the diplomatic stalemate and increase pressure on Israel to agree to a ceasefire.

It also follows the collapse of recent ceasefire talks in Qatar, where the U.S. accused Hamas of stalling. Macron’s decision may push other European nations to reconsider their stance on Palestinian statehood.

The French president’s recognition adds momentum to global calls for a two-state solution — the idea of an independent Palestinian state coexisting peacefully with Israel.

Israel’s response

Israeli leaders were quick to condemn Macron’s announcement.

“We strongly condemn President Macron’s decision,” said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “Such a move rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became.”

Netanyahu argued that granting Palestine statehood under current conditions would empower Hamas and other militant groups, jeopardizing Israel’s security.

Israel maintains its firm opposition to unilateral recognition, insisting that peace must come through direct negotiations and security guarantees.

Palestinian response

Palestinian leaders welcomed the news as a breakthrough in their decades-long pursuit of self-determination.

On Thursday, France delivered a formal diplomatic letter to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in Jerusalem. Hussein Al Sheikh, Vice President of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), posted:

“We express our thanks and appreciation to President Macron. This position reflects France’s commitment to international law and the rights of the Palestinian people.”

Macron has repeatedly voiced support for a two-state solution, and his latest move aligns France with much of the international community’s long-standing vision for peace.

France’s shifting position

France has historically supported both Israel’s right to defend itself and the need for a just, lasting peace in the region. After the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks, Macron stood with Israel and condemned antisemitism.

However, as the war in Gaza dragged on and civilian suffering worsened, France’s tone began to shift. In recent weeks, Macron has called for a ceasefire and emphasized diplomacy.

“Peace is possible,” he wrote in a second X post on Thursday, signaling France’s pivot toward deeper involvement in peace-building efforts.

International diplomacy and upcoming meetings

Macron’s announcement comes ahead of a major U.N. conference on the two-state solution, co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia next week.

Emergency talks are also scheduled for Friday involving Macron, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and German Chancellor Annalena Baerbock. The leaders are expected to discuss Gaza’s humanitarian crisis and ways to restart negotiations.

Starmer has already hinted at support for Palestinian statehood, saying:

“A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis.”

This growing Western support could mark a turning point in international engagement with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The long road to a two-state solution

The two-state solution — envisioning independent Israeli and Palestinian states — remains the most widely supported path to resolving the conflict.

Palestinians seek statehood in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza — territories captured by Israel during the 1967 Mideast war. But over 500,000 Israeli settlers now live in the West Bank, and Israel claims all of Jerusalem as its capital.

Roughly 3 million Palestinians live under Israeli military control in the West Bank, with limited self-rule under the Palestinian Authority.

Peace talks have been stalled since 2009, and ongoing settlement expansion has made a negotiated solution more difficult. Macron’s declaration could help restart stalled dialogue, though real progress will likely require deeper international coordination.

Conclusion

France’s move to recognize Palestine is a bold step that may reshape the international response to the Gaza crisis and revive long-dormant peace efforts. While symbolic for now, Macron’s announcement sends a clear signal: the world can no longer wait for a perfect moment to act.

With the humanitarian situation worsening and diplomatic options narrowing, France’s decision could influence other Western countries to follow suit — increasing pressure for a meaningful end to the conflict.

If you found this article helpful, check out our coverage on the Gaza crisis, global diplomacy, and the future of the two-state solution. Share your thoughts or join the discussion in the comments.

Source: AP News – French President Macron says France will recognize Palestine as a state

The post France to formally recognize Palestine as a state in September appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Palestinian officials have announced that Fatah and Hamas are close to reaching an agreement on forming a committee of politically independent technocrats to govern Gaza after the war. This move would effectively end Hamas’ rule over the region and could help push forward ceasefire negotiations with Israel.

The two factions, which have been at odds since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, have made several unsuccessful attempts at reconciliation. Israel, meanwhile, has ruled out any future role for either Hamas or Fatah, which leads the Palestinian Authority and is backed by Western powers.

A Palestinian Authority official confirmed on Tuesday that a preliminary agreement had been reached following weeks of talks in Cairo. The committee would consist of 12 to 15 members, most of whom would be from Gaza. The committee would report to the Palestinian Authority, based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and coordinate with local and international groups to oversee humanitarian aid and reconstruction efforts.

A Hamas official added that while the general terms of the agreement had been settled, some details and the identities of committee members are still under discussion. The final agreement is expected to be announced after a meeting of all Palestinian factions in Cairo, although no specific timeline has been provided. Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to speak to the media.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to continue military operations until Hamas is dismantled and all hostages are returned. He also stated that Israel would maintain long-term security control over Gaza, while local Palestinian administrators unaffiliated with Hamas or the Palestinian Authority would oversee civilian affairs in the region.

No Palestinians have publicly volunteered for such a role, and Hamas has warned anyone cooperating with the Israeli military. The United States has called for the Palestinian Authority to govern both the West Bank and Gaza as part of a future Palestinian state, although Israel opposes the creation of such a state. Israel is reportedly in talks with the United Arab Emirates, a country that normalized relations with Israel in 2020 and supports a rival faction of Fatah.

A Hamas official suggested that the emerging Palestinian agreement would achieve one of Israel’s war goals—ending Hamas’ rule in Gaza—but it is uncertain whether Israeli officials would view the agreement in this way.

Previous attempts at unity between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas have failed, often due to power struggles between the two factions. There is also opposition to the current talks within Fatah. Jibril Rajoub, secretary-general of Fatah’s central committee, criticized the agreement, calling it a “mistake” to even discuss such an arrangement. He argued that it would only deepen the division between Gaza and the West Bank and that Hamas should allow the Palestinian Authority to retake control of Gaza.

The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, cooperates with Israel on security matters, a policy that is unpopular among many Palestinians who see it as collaboration with the Israeli occupation. Israel has criticized the Palestinian Authority for not doing enough to combat militancy or prevent incitement.

According to the Hamas official, the committee would take over Gaza’s administration once a ceasefire with Israel is agreed upon. U.S. and Arab mediators have been working on securing such a ceasefire for nearly a year, but talks have stalled multiple times.

Hamas sparked the war on October 7, 2023, when it launched an attack on Israel, killing around 1,200 people—mostly civilians—and taking around 250 hostages. Israel’s retaliation has resulted in over 44,000 Palestinian deaths, many of them women and children, according to local health authorities. The conflict has also displaced most of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents.

Source

The post Hamas and Fatah Move Closer to Agreement on Gaza’s Future Leadership appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.