The resignation follows renewed scrutiny over Attia’s past email correspondence with Epstein. While Attia has denied any wrongdoing and said he did not attend any events connected to Epstein’s criminal conduct, he acknowledged that some of his messages were inappropriate and publicly apologized earlier this month.

CBS News confirmed on Monday that Attia stepped down from his post.

Attia’s Role at CBS News

Attia, known for his podcast and bestselling book Outlive: The Science & Art of Longevity, had recently been named a contributor to CBS News programming. The announcement was made last month by CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss.

He had also been featured in a profile on the long-running program 60 Minutes, which aired in October and highlighted his approach to preventive medicine and lifespan research.

His appointment was part of a broader effort by CBS News to bring subject-matter experts into its programming lineup. However, the timing quickly became complicated as additional Epstein-related documents entered the public domain.

Emails Surface in Epstein Document Release

The latest batch of documents, released by the U.S. Department of Justice, included references to numerous individuals across business, academia, politics and media who had various forms of contact with Epstein over the years.

Attia’s name appeared multiple times in email exchanges. In a public statement issued earlier this month, he said he had corresponded with Epstein in a professional context but had no knowledge of his criminal behavior at the time. He described some of the language in those emails as “embarrassing, tasteless and indefensible,” adding that he regretted the communications.

Epstein, who was arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges, died by suicide in a New York jail while awaiting trial. His case has continued to reverberate across public life, with court filings and document releases drawing attention to the breadth of his social and professional network.

CBS News Response and Resignation

Following the disclosure of Attia’s name in the documents, CBS News faced public questions about his role at the network. According to published reports, the organization did not initially sever ties after the documents surfaced.

Instead, Attia resigned voluntarily. CBS News confirmed the resignation but did not provide additional comment on internal discussions surrounding the decision.

The episode reflects the ongoing sensitivity surrounding individuals linked — even indirectly — to Epstein. In recent weeks, several public figures in corporate and civic sectors have stepped back from roles after their names appeared in document releases connected to the case.

Broader Implications

The continued release of Epstein-related materials has periodically renewed attention on the extent of his relationships with prominent individuals. Inclusion in documents does not in itself imply wrongdoing, a point repeatedly emphasized by legal experts and officials. However, the reputational impact has proven significant in many cases.

For Attia, whose public profile centers on science-based health advocacy and longevity research, the resignation marks a setback in his growing media presence. His podcast and medical commentary have attracted a large following, particularly among audiences interested in preventive health and performance optimization.

CBS News has not announced whether it will replace Attia in the contributor role or adjust its approach to external expert appointments.

The Justice Department has not indicated whether additional large-scale document releases are forthcoming. Legal proceedings tied to Epstein’s estate and associates continue to unfold in federal courts.

As institutions and individuals navigate the fallout, the episode underscores how historical associations — particularly in cases involving criminal misconduct — can resurface with renewed force years later, shaping professional trajectories in real time.

Source: AP News – Medical influencer Attia resigns post at CBS News after name included in multiple Epstein files

The post Peter Attia Resigns from CBS News After Epstein Files Disclosure appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The BBC has apologized to former U.S. President Donald Trump for an editing error in an October 2024 documentary that altered the context of his January 6, 2021, speech. While expressing regret, the broadcaster rejected Trump’s $1 billion defamation claim and confirmed it will not rebroadcast the program. The controversy has prompted resignations of senior BBC executives and intensified scrutiny of its editorial practices.

Background of the Documentary Controversy

The dispute centers on the BBC documentary “Trump: A Second Chance?”, which included a clip from Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech. In the documentary, Trump appeared to say:

“We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be there with you and we fight. We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

In reality, Trump’s remarks were edited out of context. He actually said:

“We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women,”

with the phrase “fight like hell” appearing 54 minutes later.

Trump and his legal team described the edit as false and defamatory, claiming it caused “overwhelming financial and reputational harm” and demanded a formal apology and $1 billion compensation.

BBC Apology and Response

On Thursday, the BBC confirmed that Chair Samir Shah had sent a personal letter to the White House apologizing for the editing error. A spokesperson stated:

“BBC lawyers have written to President Trump’s legal team, and the corporation regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited.”

The BBC emphasized it will not rebroadcast the documentary on any platform but rejected the claim that it constitutes defamation:

“While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim,” the spokesperson added.

Executive Resignations and Internal Criticism

The controversy has already led to significant leadership changes. Deborah Turness, the outgoing CEO of BBC News, resigned on Sunday, stating that the backlash had reached a point where it was causing damage to the BBC, an institution she said she loved.

Turness defended the corporation, saying that while mistakes were made, allegations of institutional bias at BBC News were incorrect. The BBC board has faced criticism for its delayed response after the editing issue surfaced in a leaked internal memo, fueling public debate over journalistic standards and impartiality.

Trump’s Reaction and Legal History

Trump publicly criticized the BBC in a Fox News interview, claiming the broadcaster had “butchered” his “beautiful” and “calming” speech, making it sound radical.

While Trump has a history of issuing legal threats without pursuing action, he has filed lawsuits in recent months against The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. His legal team has yet to respond publicly to the BBC’s apology.

Implications for Media and Journalism

The incident highlights the sensitivity of political reporting, especially involving historical events with ongoing public scrutiny. Editing errors in documentaries or news reports can lead to significant reputational and legal consequences for major broadcasters.

Media analysts note that this case may prompt the BBC and other international media organizations to strengthen editorial oversight and review processes to maintain public trust. The broadcaster’s next steps remain uncertain, including whether additional corrections or clarifications will be issued.

Current Status

• BBC apologized to Trump for the editing error.

• Defamation claim rejected; no $1 billion payout planned.

• Documentary will not be rebroadcast.

• Trump has not publicly acknowledged the apology.

• Senior BBC executives resigned, citing institutional impact.

Observers continue to monitor the situation, as the controversy could have long-term implications for BBC’s credibility and editorial practices in politically sensitive reporting.

Source: CNN – BBC apologizes to Trump over editing blunder, rejects defamation claim

The post BBC Issues Apology to Trump Over Editing Controversy appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Political tensions over document release

The release of the documents quickly became a point of political contention in Washington. Democrats on the committee initially disclosed three emails in which Epstein mentioned former U.S. President Donald Trump. Republicans, accusing their counterparts of selective disclosure, responded by releasing the full trove of 23,000 documents to provide what they described as “complete context.”

Epstein, who died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, had previously served a one-year sentence in Florida after pleading guilty in 2008 to soliciting prostitution from a minor. His social and professional network—spanning politics, academia, and business—remained remarkably intact after his first conviction.

Epstein’s references to Trump

Several of the newly released emails feature Epstein’s exchanges with journalists and associates in which he discussed former President Trump. Epstein and Trump were acquaintances for years before reportedly having a falling out in the mid-2000s, well before Epstein’s criminal activities gained broader public attention.

One 2019 email to author and journalist Michael Wolff drew attention after Epstein referred to Virginia Giuffre, one of his accusers, who had worked at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort. “She was the one who accused Prince Andrew,” Epstein wrote.

Epstein added in the same exchange that Trump “knew about the girls,” though the context of that statement remains unclear. Trump has long maintained that he banned Epstein from his private club, claiming Epstein had been “taking people who worked for me.”

Giuffre, who died by suicide earlier this year, had previously stated that she met Trump once and that he had not been involved in Epstein’s alleged abuse of minors. She also said she did not believe Trump was aware of Epstein’s crimes.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt criticized Democrats for what she described as an attempt to “create a fake narrative to smear President Trump” through selective document leaks.

References to Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell

Epstein’s correspondence also revisits his longstanding association with Britain’s Prince Andrew—now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Giuffre alleged that Epstein and his former companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, coerced her into sexual encounters with Andrew when she was 17. The claims led to Andrew’s withdrawal from royal duties and the loss of several titles.

In a 2011 email, Epstein disputed Giuffre’s credibility, writing to a reporter, “Yes, she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew as many of my employees have, but this girl is a total liar.” He then said he would ask whether Andrew’s “people” would cooperate with the journalist on a story.

Another message that same year referenced both Trump and Giuffre. “i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump,” Epstein wrote to Maxwell, suggesting that despite Giuffre’s time at his home, Trump had never been accused of misconduct. Maxwell replied, “I have been thinking about that.”

Mountbatten-Windsor has consistently denied any wrongdoing.

Clinton and the Caribbean island allegations

Several emails show Epstein’s efforts to respond to claims that former President Bill Clinton had visited his private island in the Caribbean. “Presidents at dinner on Caribbean islands (Clinton was never ever there, easy to confirm),” Epstein wrote, dismissing Giuffre’s published account as false.

Clinton has acknowledged traveling on Epstein’s private jet for charitable work linked to the Clinton Foundation but has denied visiting Epstein’s island or being aware of his criminal behavior. None of Epstein’s known accusers have implicated Clinton in any abuse.

Epstein’s relationship with the press

Many of the released emails depict Epstein as a frequent correspondent with reporters who sought his insights on politics, finance, and the elite circles he moved in. Several journalists reached out to him for off-the-record commentary, including on topics such as global oil markets and the personal relationships of world leaders.

In return, Epstein appeared eager to influence how he was portrayed in the media. He often contested published allegations and tried to leverage his connections to counter negative coverage.

In one 2016 email, he told a reporter, “I never met Al Gore. No diners on the island either, no matter how much detail has been in the press.” He further encouraged the journalist to emphasize that Clinton “was never on the island.”

Epstein’s communications suggest that, even after his first conviction, he sought to maintain a position of influence through his access to prominent individuals and journalists.

Broader implications of the document release

The new trove of emails has reignited scrutiny of how Epstein managed to remain socially and professionally connected despite his criminal history. Analysts say the release underscores the complex intersection of money, power, and influence in elite circles.

Legal experts note that while many of the emails offer limited new evidence, they may provide additional insight into Epstein’s efforts to manage his image and relationships in the years leading up to his death.

The House Oversight Committee said its goal in publishing the documents was to ensure transparency and allow the public to review the full extent of Epstein’s communications with political, media, and financial figures.

Epstein’s death in 2019, ruled a suicide by New York City’s medical examiner, continues to fuel public debate and conspiracy theories, though no credible evidence has emerged to suggest foul play.

As congressional investigators and journalists sift through the thousands of pages of correspondence, the newly released files are likely to renew discussion about accountability, privilege, and the enduring influence of wealth in political and social systems worldwide.

Source: AP News – Takeaways from the newly released Epstein documents

The post Jeffrey Epstein Documents Reveal New Details on Political, Media, and Royal Connections appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

BBC Director-General Tim Davie and News and Current Affairs CEO Deborah Turness both announced their departures on Sunday after mounting pressure over the editing of a Trump address featured in a BBC documentary.

The controversy centers on a segment of Trump’s January 6, 2021 speech — delivered shortly before his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol — which critics claim was edited in a misleading way that omitted his call for supporters to “peacefully” demonstrate.

Leadership Accountability and Institutional Responsibility

In a letter to BBC staff, Davie, who led the corporation for five years, said his decision to step down was made independently.

“Overall, the BBC is delivering well, but there have been some mistakes made and as director-general, I have to take ultimate responsibility,” Davie wrote. He added that he would coordinate with the BBC Board to ensure “an orderly transition to a successor over the coming months.”

Turness, who had led BBC News since 2022, also cited the growing impact of the controversy. “The situation has reached a stage where it is causing damage to the BBC — an institution that I love,” she said in a message to staff. “In public life, leaders need to be fully accountable, and that is why I am stepping down.”

She emphasized, however, that “recent allegations that BBC News is institutionally biased are wrong,” acknowledging that “mistakes have been made” but rejecting broader claims of systemic prejudice.

Political Fallout and Trump’s Reaction

The issue gained international traction after Trump shared a link on his Truth Social platform to a Daily Telegraph article criticizing the BBC’s edit. In his post, Trump thanked the newspaper “for exposing these Corrupt ‘Journalists,’” calling the editing “a terrible thing for Democracy.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt weighed in on X (formerly Twitter), posting an image juxtaposing headlines about Trump’s criticism of the BBC and Davie’s resignation, captioned “shot” and “chaser.”

The incident has become the latest flashpoint in the former president’s ongoing campaign against major news outlets, which he frequently labels as “fake news.”

Mounting Pressure and Broader Scrutiny of the BBC

The controversy escalated after The Telegraph published portions of an internal review compiled by communications consultant Michael Prescott, who was hired to advise the BBC on editorial standards and impartiality.

The review not only raised concerns about the Trump documentary but also criticized the broadcaster’s coverage of transgender issues and alleged bias against Israel within its Arabic-language service.

The BBC — founded in 1922 and funded primarily through a public license fee — has long faced political and media scrutiny due to its dual role as both a national institution and an independent news organization. Every UK household with a television pays £174.50 (about $230) annually to support the broadcaster’s operations.

A National Institution Under Pressure

The BBC’s vast programming spans entertainment, sports, and educational content across television, radio, and digital platforms. Yet its news division remains its most controversial arm, frequently accused of bias from across the political spectrum.

Conservative politicians often allege a left-leaning agenda, while some liberal critics claim the broadcaster has drifted toward conservative viewpoints.

In recent months, the BBC has also faced criticism for its coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict in Gaza. In February, the broadcaster removed a documentary after reports surfaced that its child narrator was related to a Hamas official.

Political Reactions in the United Kingdom

The leadership departures triggered swift responses from across the UK political landscape. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the opposition Conservative Party, accused the BBC of “institutional bias” and called for “genuine reform of the culture of the BBC, top to bottom.”

Meanwhile, Lisa Nandy, the minister responsible for media under Britain’s centre-left Labour government, thanked Davie for his service and reaffirmed the government’s support for the broadcaster.

“Now more than ever, the need for trusted news and high-quality programming is essential to our democratic and cultural life,” Nandy said. “The government will continue to ensure the BBC remains at the heart of national life for decades to come.”

Future of the BBC and Public Trust

The resignations mark a pivotal moment for the 103-year-old broadcaster, whose reputation for impartiality and public trust has been a cornerstone of its global influence.

Analysts say the twin resignations underscore the challenges facing publicly funded media in an era of political polarization, misinformation, and social media scrutiny.

As the BBC begins its search for new leadership, questions remain over how it will navigate the delicate balance between accountability, transparency, and editorial independence in a rapidly evolving media environment.

Source: AP News – Top BBC bosses resign after criticism of the broadcaster’s editing of a Trump speech

The post BBC Director-General and News Chief Resign Amid Controversy Over Trump Speech Editing appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A live video showing Miss Universe Mexico, Fatima Bosch, being scolded by a Thai pageant official has gone viral. The clip sparked allegations of misogyny and reignited global debate about women’s treatment in beauty pageants.

In the footage, Nawat Itsaragrisil, president of Miss Grand International (MGI), is seen publicly criticizing Bosch for not posting enough promotional content about Thailand, the host country of the 74th Miss Universe competition. The event will be held in Bangkok later this month.

During the heated exchange, Nawat accused Bosch of following orders from Mexico’s pageant director to sabotage promotional activities. He allegedly called her a “dumbhead” — a claim he later denied, saying he meant she caused “damage.”

When Bosch tried to respond, Nawat interrupted her and said, “I didn’t give you the opportunity to talk.” He then ordered security to escort her out of the room. Several contestants stood in solidarity with Bosch and walked out, prompting Nawat to threaten disqualification if they didn’t return to their seats.

Contestant’s Response and Public Support

Bosch, 25, later told reporters that she felt insulted and unfairly treated. She suggested the confrontation came from tension between Nawat and the Miss Universe Organization, whose president is also Mexican.

“I’m here to represent my country and give my best,” Bosch said in a TikTok video. “He told me to ‘shut up’ and said many things that were disrespectful. The world needs to see this because women are empowered, and no one can silence our voices.”

Her statement drew widespread support. The president of the Miss Universe Organization, Raúl Rocha, condemned Nawat’s actions and barred him from further participation in official events. Rocha said the Thai official humiliated Bosch and tried to intimidate her.

“I have restricted Nawat’s involvement in all Miss Universe activities,” Rocha said. “No one has the right to silence or exclude a contestant.”

Nawat later apologized during a live ceremony, saying, “I have to say I’m very sorry. I didn’t mean to hurt anyone.”

Mexico’s President Weighs In

The controversy reached Mexico’s highest office. President Claudia Sheinbaum praised Bosch’s courage during a national press briefing, calling her response “an example of how women must raise their voices.”

Sheinbaum recalled a familiar Mexican phrase, “Calladita te ves más bonita” — “You look more beautiful when you’re silent.” She rejected the saying, proposing a new message:
“Women look more beautiful when we raise our voices and participate. This is about recognizing our rights. I admire this young woman,” she said.

Pageant Industry Faces Renewed Criticism

The incident reignited long-standing criticism of beauty pageants and their treatment of women. Catalina Ruiz Navarro, a Colombian feminist journalist based in Mexico City, told CNN that contests like Miss Universe still reflect patriarchal values.

“The Miss Universe pageant disciplines and monitors women’s bodies,” Ruiz Navarro said. “Bosch’s response was courageous because she risked her standing. The fact that other contestants joined her shows collective strength.”

Sheynnis Palacios, Miss Universe 2023 from Nicaragua, also spoke out. She said on social media that “a crown should not cost a woman her dignity.” Pageants, she added, should empower women, not humiliate them.

Alicia Machado, the 1996 Miss Universe from Venezuela, shared similar memories. “I faced the same issues years ago,” she said. “These competitions must evolve and support gender equality, not outdated practices.”

Calls for Change in Beauty Pageants

Activists say this incident could push the industry toward reform. Ruiz Navarro believes Bosch’s stand may limit such abuse, but she argues change must go deeper.

“As long as pageants exist, they must be fairer and more inclusive,” she said. “Every woman deserves dignity and respect.”

This year’s Miss Universe competition began in Bangkok on Sunday, with contestants from 130 countries. The finale is set for November 21, where the new titleholder will be crowned.

Source: CNN – ‘No one can shut our voice’: Miss Universe Mexico confronts mistreatment

The post ‘No One Can Shut Our Voice’: Miss Universe Mexico Sparks Global Outrage Over Mistreatment appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Announcing the project on social media, Musk said that Grokipedia.com is “now live” and described its mission as promoting “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.” The new platform marks Musk’s latest venture under his artificial intelligence company, xAI, which he founded in 2023 to develop generative AI models competing with systems from OpenAI and Google.

Musk’s ongoing feud with Wikipedia

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has repeatedly accused Wikipedia of political bias, calling it “propaganda” and urging people to stop donating to the Wikimedia Foundation, which operates the nonprofit encyclopedia. In September, Musk revealed that xAI was developing Grokipedia as a fact-based alternative “free from ideological distortion.”

The website currently features a minimalist interface — a plain search bar and limited navigation tools. According to its landing page, Grokipedia contains 885,279 articles, far fewer than Wikipedia’s more than 7 million English-language entries. Users can search for a range of topics, including pop culture, sports, and historical events.

Unclear authorship and AI involvement

While Wikipedia’s entries are written and edited by a global network of human volunteers, the editorial process behind Grokipedia remains opaque. Reports suggest that the site draws heavily on xAI’s Grok chatbot model, which powers Musk’s AI assistant integrated into X (formerly Twitter). Some of Grokipedia’s content appears to be AI-generated or adapted from Wikipedia itself, raising questions about authorship, sourcing, and copyright.

The Wikimedia Foundation, headquartered in San Francisco, said Tuesday that it is “still in the process of understanding how Grokipedia works.” A spokesperson added that human-generated knowledge like Wikipedia’s continues to play an essential role in AI development.

“This human-created knowledge is what AI companies rely on to generate content; even Grokipedia needs Wikipedia to exist,” the Foundation said in a statement.

A clash over information control

Wikipedia has long been a cornerstone of the open internet, serving billions of users and acting as a training resource for AI systems such as ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. But in recent months, it has become a target of political scrutiny.

In August, Republican lawmakers in the U.S. Congress launched an investigation into alleged “manipulation efforts” within Wikipedia’s editorial process, claiming bias in political coverage. The inquiry also questioned how such biases might influence AI models trained on Wikipedia data.

Wikipedia’s editors, however, operate under strict transparency and sourcing rules, requiring nearly every statement to be backed by a cited source. Entries with unverifiable claims can be challenged and removed by the community.

By contrast, early reviews of Grokipedia suggest its articles vary widely in quality and sourcing depth. For instance, its entry on the Chola Dynasty of southern India includes only three linked sources, compared with Wikipedia’s 113 citations and multiple book references.

Grokipedia’s critique of Wikipedia

One of Grokipedia’s most visited entries is its own page about Wikipedia, which accuses the platform of having “systemic ideological biases — particularly a left-leaning slant in coverage of political figures and topics.”

That criticism mirrors Musk’s broader campaign against what he sees as media and tech bias. Since acquiring Twitter in 2022, Musk has positioned his platforms as champions of free expression, often clashing with mainstream media and advocacy groups over misinformation and content moderation.

Wikimedia Foundation defends transparency and rigor

Responding to Musk’s new venture, the Wikimedia Foundation defended Wikipedia’s open-editing model and long-established governance.

“Unlike newer projects, Wikipedia’s strengths are clear: it has transparent policies, rigorous volunteer oversight, and a strong culture of continuous improvement,” the organization said. “Wikipedia is an encyclopedia written to inform billions of readers without promoting a particular point of view.”

Industry analysts note that Grokipedia may face challenges establishing credibility and reliability, especially if its content relies heavily on AI without human editorial oversight. Others see the launch as part of Musk’s broader effort to expand xAI’s influence and diversify the X platform ecosystem through products promoting what he calls “uncensored truth.”

A new experiment in digital knowledge

Grokipedia’s debut adds to a growing conversation about how AI-generated content will coexist with human-curated knowledge sources. As digital platforms increasingly automate the creation and distribution of information, questions about accuracy, transparency, and editorial accountability are likely to intensify.

Whether Grokipedia will emerge as a genuine rival to Wikipedia—or simply a politically charged alternative—remains to be seen. For now, Musk’s latest project underscores a shifting battle over who defines “truth” in the age of artificial intelligence.

Sorce: AP News – Elon Musk launches Grokipedia to compete with online encyclopedia Wikipedia

The post ELON MUSK UNVEILS GROKIPEDIA AS RIVAL TO WIKIPEDIA appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

One of the most powerful images from the Vietnam War — the world-famous Napalm Girl photo — is at the center of a growing dispute. World Press Photo, which awarded the picture its 1973 “Photo of the Year,” has now suspended its official attribution to longtime Associated Press (AP) photographer Nick Ut, citing serious doubts about the photo’s true author.

The decision follows claims raised in The Stringer, a new documentary that premiered at Sundance, which argues that the image was actually captured by Nguyen Thanh Nghe, a Vietnamese freelancer. The film alleges Nghe took the photo and sold it to the AP before Ut was credited — a claim Ut and the AP strongly deny.

The Photo That Shook the World

Taken on June 8, 1972, the image shows a young, naked Phan Thi Kim Phuc fleeing a napalm attack near the village of Trang Bang. It quickly became a defining symbol of the horrors of the Vietnam War and later earned Ut a Pulitzer Prize.

But more than 50 years later, the photo’s authorship is being questioned in earnest.

Why the Doubt?

World Press Photo cited new technical analysis and visual studies that challenge Ut’s claim to the image. A reconstruction of the scene suggested that Ut would have had to take the shot, sprint nearly 60 meters, and return to help Kim Phuc in an extremely short time — a scenario the organization called “highly unlikely.”

At the heart of the debate is the type of camera used. While AP believed the photo was likely taken with a Pentax, which Nghe owned, Ut had long claimed he used Leica and Nikon cameras. Under new questioning, Ut acknowledged he may have used Pentax gear as well. AP later confirmed that some Vietnam-era negatives attributed to Ut match Pentax camera characteristics.

The investigation also raises the possibility that another photographer, Vietnamese military photojournalist Huynh Cong Phuc, could have taken the image.

AP and Nick Ut Push Back

In response, the AP conducted a 96-page internal review, including interviews, photo analysis, and a 3D model of the scene. Their conclusion? There’s no solid proof to change the original credit. The agency said the claims against Ut rely on speculation and that the evidence for Nghe’s authorship doesn’t hold up.

Ut himself, now retired and living in the U.S., has called the challenge “deplorable and unprofessional.” His legal team insists Nghe’s claim is entirely unsupported by witnesses or hard evidence.

“This whole thing has been very difficult for me and has caused great pain,” Ut said in a recent statement.

Pulitzer Stands By Its Award

Despite the debate, the Pulitzer Prize board has no plans to revisit Ut’s award. “The Pulitzer Prizes depend on submitting news organizations to determine the authorship of their entries,” said a spokesperson, emphasizing that AP’s own findings are key.

A Legacy Still Intact — For Now

The photograph remains one of the most iconic in history. The day after it was taken, it ran on front pages around the world and helped shift public opinion against the war.

Ut has spent years campaigning for peace alongside Kim Phuc, who miraculously survived her injuries and later moved to Canada. In 2022, to mark the image’s 50th anniversary, Ut recalled the moment he took the shot:

“I saw Kim running and she screamed ‘Too hot! Too hot!’ in Vietnamese. Her body was so badly burned. I put down my cameras and poured water on her, then rushed her to the hospital.”

As of now, World Press Photo has not reassigned authorship but maintains that there is too much uncertainty to continue crediting Ut outright. The suspension will stay in place unless conclusive evidence emerges in the future.

Source: CNN – Who took ‘Napalm Girl’? World Press Photo ‘suspends’ attribution of historic Vietnam War image

The post Napalm Girl Photo Credit Suspended Amid New Controversy appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Bill Belichick may not have coached a game yet for the North Carolina Tar Heels, but his new chapter is already grabbing headlines—this time off the field.

The legendary NFL coach pushed back Wednesday against how a recent interview with CBS Sunday Morning portrayed his relationship with 24-year-old girlfriend Jordon Hudson. The interview, centered on Belichick’s new book The Art of Winning, included a now-viral moment when Hudson cut in as reporter Tony Dokoupil asked how the couple first met.

Belichick, 73, issued a statement through the university, saying CBS strayed from what was supposed to be a football- and book-focused conversation.

“I was surprised when unrelated topics were introduced,” Belichick said, adding that he had “repeatedly expressed” to Dokoupil and the producers that he preferred to stay on topic. “Jordon, with whom I share both a personal and professional relationship, stepped in to help refocus the discussion.”

The coach clarified that Hudson wasn’t dodging any specific question, but rather ensuring the interview stayed aligned with their original intent. He also took issue with the editing, suggesting CBS crafted a misleading narrative.

“The final eight-minute segment doesn’t reflect the productive 35-minute conversation we had,” Belichick said. “Instead, it selectively shows a few minutes to suggest Jordon was controlling the conversation—which is simply not true.”

CBS responded later Wednesday, stating the interview was always intended to be wide-ranging and that “no preconditions or limitations” had been agreed upon.

During the interview, Belichick was asked how he handles public scrutiny of his personal life. His answer was straightforward:

“Never been too worried about what everybody else thinks,” he said. “Just trying to do what’s best for me and what’s right.”

As for the question that stirred the viral moment—how they met—Belichick shared on Wednesday that it was on a 2021 flight to Palm Beach, Florida. The timeline aligns with a post Hudson made earlier this year.

Hudson was described by CBS as a “constant presence” during filming, a detail that added to online speculation. However, Belichick insists the real story was lost in the editing room.

Belichick’s move to North Carolina marks his first college coaching job after decades of NFL dominance, including six Super Bowl wins as the New England Patriots’ head coach and two more as defensive coordinator for the New York Giants. He parted ways with the Patriots in January 2024 after a historic 24-year run.

Now in Chapel Hill, he’s focused on football—and clearly, on setting the record straight.

Source: CNN – Bill Belichick pushes back on claims about girlfriend Jordon Hudson following viral CBS interview

The post Bill Belichick Defends Girlfriend After CBS Interview Goes Viral appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Washington Post journalists and former staff members are openly pushing back against Jeff Bezos after his announcement of a major editorial shift that will reshape the paper’s Opinion section. The change will focus almost entirely on personal liberties and free markets, sidelining opposing viewpoints.

Bezos’ Controversial Announcement

In a rare public statement on Wednesday, Bezos revealed that the Post’s editorial section will now publish daily opinion pieces supporting and defending these two “pillars.” While the section will still cover other topics, Bezos made it clear that opposing viewpoints will be left to other publications.

This move comes amid growing concerns over the Post’s financial struggles, a declining subscriber base, and ongoing newsroom discontent. Many readers had already canceled subscriptions in protest of Bezos’ ownership, and his choice of publisher last year has been widely unpopular among employees.

Growing Friction Between Bezos and Post Journalists

Tensions between Bezos and Post journalists have been brewing for months. Staffers are particularly alarmed by his increasingly close ties with former President Donald Trump.

Bezos’ announcement also revealed the resignation of David Shipley, the Opinion section editor. Shipley’s departure follows Bezos’ controversial October decision to block a pro-Kamala Harris endorsement—a move that reportedly led to a loss of 250,000 subscribers and sparked internal backlash.

A Shock to the System

The newsroom reaction was swift and severe. Former executive editor Marty Baron, under whose leadership the Post won 11 Pulitzer Prizes, condemned Bezos’ decision, stating:

“Bezos has ironically undermined personal liberties by cravenly yielding to a president who shows no respect for liberty. He is prioritizing commercial interests over The Post and betraying its longstanding principles.”

Other notable reactions include:

• Cameron Barr, former senior managing editor, announced on LinkedIn that he is ending his “professional association” with the Post, calling the changes “an unacceptable erosion of its commitment to diverse opinion.”
• Philip Bump, a Post newsletter writer, reacted on Bluesky with: “What the actual f**k.”
• David Maraniss, a longtime editor, vowed: “I will never write for the Post again as long as Bezos is the owner.”
• Amanda Katz, a former Opinion section editor, called the shift “an absolute abandonment of accountability, democracy, and justice in favor of a billionaire’s self-serving agenda.”

Pushback from the Newsroom

Though Bezos’ changes directly affect only the Opinion section, Post reporters are concerned about future interference in the newsroom.

• Jeff Stein, an economy reporter, called the changes a “massive encroachment” and warned he would resign if Bezos attempted to influence news coverage.
• Dan Lamothe, a military affairs reporter, stated: “I’m not shifting my coverage.”
• Executive Editor Matt Murray sent an email attempting to calm fears, reassuring staff that while owners traditionally influence opinion pages, the newsroom remains independent.

Subscription Cancellations and Reader Backlash

The Opinion section overhaul is expected to worsen the Post’s already declining financial situation. Some executives had reportedly warned Bezos that the change would drive away even more subscribers.

Several readers voiced their outrage and canceled their subscriptions in protest:

• Colin Woodard, director at the Pell Center for International Relations, stated he is reallocating his subscription budget to media that uphold democratic values.
• Stanford Law Professor Mark Lemley urged followers on LinkedIn: “If you haven’t unsubscribed, it’s time.”

Billionaire Media Takeovers and Trump’s Influence

Bezos isn’t the only media owner making drastic changes. Patrick Soon-Shiong, owner of the Los Angeles Times, has been criticized for introducing a bias meter and a conservative overhaul of the Times’ Opinion section. Other major outlets, including ABC News and CBS News, have also faced scrutiny for settling lawsuits with Trump in ways that critics say pander to his interests.

Former executive editor Marty Baron summed up the frustration, stating:

“What Bezos is doing today runs counter to what he professed—and actually practiced—during my tenure. I couldn’t be more sad and disgusted.”

Source

The post Washington Post Staff Revolts Against Jeff Bezos’ Editorial Changes appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Elon Musk, 53, has reportedly welcomed his 13th child, according to author Ashley St. Clair. In a surprising revelation, St. Clair announced on Friday, February 14, that she gave birth to their child five months ago.

Ashley St. Clair’s Announcement

St. Clair shared the news on X (formerly Twitter), explaining that she had initially kept the birth private to protect her child’s safety.

“Five months ago, I welcomed a new baby into the world. Elon Musk is the father. I have not previously disclosed this to protect our child’s privacy and safety, but in recent days, it has become clear that tabloid media intends to do so, regardless of the harm it will cause.”

She urged the media to respect their child’s privacy, adding:

“I intend to allow our child to grow in a normal and safe environment. For that reason, I ask that the media honor our child’s privacy and refrain from invasive reporting.”

Her post was captioned with the Latin phrase “Alea Iacta Est”, meaning “The die is cast.”

Who Is Ashley St. Clair?

St. Clair is best known as an outspoken conservative author. She wrote the children’s book Elephants Are Not Birds, published by BRAVE Books. The book, which promotes conservative and Christian values, follows a character named Kevin who learns that despite being able to sing, he is not a bird—challenging ideas about identity.

According to the BRAVE Books website, the company collaborates with figures who uphold “moral integrity” to help teach children traditional values.

Musk’s Growing Family

Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has fathered 13 children from multiple relationships. His children include:

• With ex-wife Justine Wilson (Canadian author)
  • Nevada Alexander (died at 10 weeks old)
  • Twins: Vivian and Griffin (20)
  • Triplets: Kai, Saxon, and Damian (18)
• With singer Grimes
  • X Æ A-12 (4)
  • Exa Dark Sideræl (3)
  • Techno Mechanicus (age undisclosed)
• With Neuralink executive Shivon Zilis
  • Twins: Strider and Azure (3)
  • Another child, born early 2024 (name undisclosed)

With this latest revelation, Musk’s family continues to expand, adding yet another chapter to his already complex personal life.

Source

The post Ashley St. Clair Reveals She Secretly Had a Baby with Elon Musk appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.