The policy clarification, released by CMS last week, outlines how states should determine whether Medicaid beneficiaries qualify as medically frail under work requirement provisions included in President Donald Trump’s 2025 tax and policy legislation. Health policy analysts, patient advocates and state Medicaid officials say the guidance could increase administrative burdens for some of the program’s most vulnerable participants.

The changes affect adults ages 19 to 64 enrolled through Medicaid expansion programs in participating states. Beginning in 2027, most enrollees will be required to document at least 80 hours per month of work or community service, or maintain at least half-time school enrollment, unless they qualify for an exemption.

For patients coping with chronic illness, cancer-related complications, disabilities or other serious medical conditions, the question is increasingly centered on how those exemptions will be evaluated.

New Definition of Medical Frailty

The law establishing the work requirements identified medically frail individuals as including people with disabilities, substance use disorders and serious medical conditions. However, CMS guidance introduced an additional standard requiring that a condition “significantly impair” an individual’s ability to meet the work, volunteer or educational thresholds established under the law.

Under the framework, eligible individuals will initially be allowed to attest that they meet the medically frail definition. During future coverage renewals, however, documentation may be required to verify their eligibility.

Patient advocates and state officials say the guidance leaves uncertainty about what evidence will satisfy federal requirements.

Questions remain about whether physician statements, medical records, claims data or other forms of documentation will be necessary. Some healthcare providers may be reluctant to issue certifications regarding a patient’s ability to work, while others already face significant administrative workloads.

States Face Implementation Challenges

State Medicaid agencies have spent months preparing systems intended to identify exempt individuals automatically through claims data and other available records.

During a recent call with reporters, CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz expressed support for minimizing direct administrative burdens on beneficiaries and said he hoped most eligible individuals could be identified without needing extensive interaction with state agencies.

However, CMS later told The Associated Press that states would not be permitted to automatically exempt individuals solely based on a diagnosis or medical condition. The agency indicated that verification through claims data or other documentation would generally be required during renewal processes.

State Medicaid officials and policy consultants argue that existing claims databases often do not contain information showing whether a medical condition substantially limits a person’s capacity to work or attend school.

As a result, states may be required to make eligibility determinations using information that is not currently captured within their systems.

Concerns Over Administrative Burden

Health policy experts warn that additional documentation requirements could create barriers for people already managing significant health challenges.

Adrianna McIntyre, a professor at Harvard University’s school of public health, said the policy could increase paperwork demands on Medicaid beneficiaries with serious illnesses and potentially contribute to coverage losses among eligible individuals.

Patients with chronic health conditions have expressed concerns that navigating exemption procedures may require repeated physician visits and extensive documentation efforts.

Advocates also note that healthcare providers may face new administrative responsibilities at a time when many practices already report staffing shortages and growing paperwork requirements.

In Nebraska, which began implementing Medicaid work requirements ahead of the federal timeline, officials previously relied on diagnostic codes to identify medically frail beneficiaries. Policy advocates say the state’s system may require revisions to align with the updated federal guidance.

Cost and Operational Pressures

Implementing the new work requirement system represents a major operational undertaking for states.

Federal funding totaling approximately $200 million has been allocated to assist implementation efforts, while CMS has partnered with technology companies to provide certain services at reduced or no cost.

Nevertheless, an Associated Press analysis estimated that combined technology upgrades, staffing needs and administrative changes could ultimately cost more than $1 billion, with expenses shared between federal and state governments.

Debate Over Medicaid Work Requirements

The policy continues to generate sharp political debate.

Democratic lawmakers and healthcare advocates have argued that work requirements could result in eligible individuals losing health coverage because of administrative hurdles rather than changes in medical need or eligibility.

Supporters of the policy, including Republican lawmakers and administration officials, contend that work requirements help preserve Medicaid resources for those who need assistance most and encourage greater workforce participation among able-bodied beneficiaries.

Dr. Oz cited research from the conservative American Enterprise Institute suggesting that some Medicaid recipients spend significant portions of their day outside the workforce. He described the work requirements as an effort to address that issue.

Some Medicaid enrollees, however, say such characterizations overlook the realities faced by people living with chronic health conditions that may not qualify them for disability benefits but still limit their ability to maintain consistent employment.

For many patients, the debate centers less on policy ideology and more on whether they can continue accessing healthcare coverage while managing serious health challenges.

Tags: Medicaid, Healthcare Policy, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicaid Work Requirements, Medical Frailty Exemptions, Health Insurance Coverage, ,Chronic Illness, Public Health Policy

The post Medicaid Work Requirement Guidance Raises Concerns for Patients With Chronic Illnesses appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Written July 28, 2025, 19:00 EDT

A federal judge has ruled that Planned Parenthood clinics across the United States must continue to receive Medicaid reimbursements, delivering a significant legal victory to the health care provider in its ongoing battle against efforts to limit access to reproductive services. The ruling halts a key provision in former President Donald Trump’s tax legislation that aimed to restrict federal funding to certain abortion providers.

The decision ensures that over a million patients who rely on Medicaid for essential services like cancer screenings, contraception, and STI testing will not lose access to care — at least for now.

Legal ruling protects access to reproductive health services

On Monday, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued a new order preventing the federal government from enforcing a rule that would have cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood affiliates. The measure was part of a provision in the Trump administration’s tax overhaul that aimed to withhold Medicaid payments for one year from abortion providers receiving more than $800,000 in reimbursements.

This ruling replaces a previous, narrower injunction from the same judge, which temporarily blocked funding cuts for specific Planned Parenthood centers that did not offer abortion services or had smaller Medicaid reimbursements.

Judge Talwani wrote that blocking access to Medicaid funding would disrupt essential health services for vulnerable communities. “Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable,” she noted. The court also cited concerns over increased rates of unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections due to restricted access to contraception and preventive care.

Planned Parenthood’s legal challenge

Planned Parenthood filed the lawsuit shortly after the funding restrictions were introduced, arguing that the Trump administration’s policy was not only politically motivated but would cause irreparable harm to millions of Americans who rely on its clinics for health care.

According to court filings, nearly 200 Planned Parenthood health centers in 24 states faced potential closure if the Medicaid restrictions went into effect. This would have impacted more than 1 million patients, many of whom rely on Medicaid as their only form of insurance.

In a public statement, Planned Parenthood’s president and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson emphasized the broader implications of the case.

“We’re suing the Trump administration over this targeted attack on Planned Parenthood health centers and the patients who rely on them for care,” Johnson said. “This case is about making sure that patients who use Medicaid as their insurance to get birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment can continue to do so at their local Planned Parenthood health center, and we will make that clear in court.”

Medicaid, abortion funding, and federal law

Although federal funds are generally prohibited from covering abortion services under the Hyde Amendment, Medicaid funding can still be used for other medical services offered by reproductive health clinics. Planned Parenthood and similar organizations are reimbursed by Medicaid for providing a wide range of non-abortion-related care, including routine exams, pap smears, contraception counseling, pregnancy testing, and STD treatment.

Critics of the Trump administration’s attempt to restrict Medicaid payments argued that the proposed policy overstepped legal bounds by penalizing organizations that offer abortion among many other services.

Supporters of the restriction, however, claimed that taxpayer dollars should not be funneled into organizations that also provide abortion services — even if those dollars are not used for abortion care itself.

Health experts warn of broader public health risks

Judge Talwani’s ruling highlighted concerns raised by public health officials about the potential impact of reduced access to care. In areas where Planned Parenthood clinics are often the only provider of reproductive health services, eliminating Medicaid funding could lead to significant gaps in care, particularly for low-income individuals, women of color, and rural populations.

The court acknowledged these risks, stating that restricting healthcare access “threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications” and “an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs.”

Health policy analysts also noted that such cuts could place further strain on public health systems, especially in states where alternative care providers are limited.

What’s next in the legal fight?

The Biden administration has not enforced the Medicaid restrictions implemented during Trump’s presidency, but the court’s ruling makes it more difficult for future administrations to revive similar efforts. The broader case is still ongoing, and Planned Parenthood is expected to continue its challenge in federal court.

The ruling does not prevent Congress or future presidents from introducing new legislation that could limit federal funding to reproductive health providers, but it does set a legal precedent that could shape future debates on Medicaid, abortion access, and healthcare policy.

A political flashpoint ahead of 2026 elections

Reproductive rights continue to be a polarizing issue in American politics. The 2026 midterm elections are expected to feature renewed debates over federal funding for health clinics, access to contraception, and the future of Medicaid.

Planned Parenthood’s legal victory may energize supporters of reproductive healthcare access, while opponents are likely to pursue alternative legislative or judicial avenues to limit abortion-related funding.

For now, the court’s decision keeps critical funding flowing to hundreds of clinics, safeguarding healthcare for millions of Americans who depend on Medicaid-supported services.

Source: AP News – Judge blocks Trump administration’s efforts to defund Planned Parenthood

The post Judge halts Trump-era Medicaid cutoff for Planned Parenthood appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A powerful new tool in the global fight against HIV has arrived — but whether it can live up to its promise may depend more on access than science.

The U.S. has just approved the world’s only twice-yearly HIV prevention shot, a drug called lenacapavir, developed by Gilead Sciences. It’s being hailed as a potential game-changer: in two major studies, it nearly eliminated new HIV infections in people at high risk, outperforming existing daily pills.

“This really has the possibility of ending HIV transmission,” said Greg Millett, public policy director at amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research.

But despite the breakthrough, there’s a growing concern: will enough people actually get the shot?

How It Works: A New Kind of PrEP

While we still don’t have an HIV vaccine, PrEP — or pre-exposure prophylaxis — has become a frontline method of preventing infection. But current options, like daily pills or injections every two months, come with hurdles: people forget doses, miss appointments, or face stigma.

That’s where lenacapavir steps in.

Marketed under the new brand name Yeztugo (it’s already sold as Sunlenca for HIV treatment), the shot is given twice a year as two injections under the skin of the abdomen. The drug forms a slow-release “depot” that offers long-lasting protection.

Users must test negative for HIV before starting, and while the shot doesn’t prevent other STDs, its ease and effectiveness could dramatically expand prevention access — especially for people who can’t or won’t take a daily pill.

Game-Changing Results From Major Studies

The numbers speak for themselves:

• In a landmark trial of 5,300 young women and girls in South Africa and Uganda, zero participants who received lenacapavir became infected with HIV. By contrast, around 2% of those on daily PrEP pills did.
• A second study involving gay and gender-diverse participants in the U.S. and other high-risk countries found similarly high effectiveness.

For people like Ian Haddock of Houston, the difference has been life-changing.

“Now I forget that I’m on PrEP because I don’t have to carry around a pill bottle,” said Haddock, who took part in the study and now gets the shot every six months. “Just remembering a clinic visit every six months is a powerful tool.”

So What’s the Catch? Access and Affordability

Despite its promise, access to lenacapavir may be severely limited — especially in places that need it most.

• In the U.S., the shot will cost about $28,218 a year before insurance. Gilead says it expects private insurers to cover it and has financial assistance programs, but looming challenges remain:
  • A Supreme Court case could overturn insurance coverage mandates for PrEP.
  • Medicaid cuts under consideration in Congress could put it further out of reach.
  • Much of the CDC’s HIV prevention outreach infrastructure was dismantled under the Trump administration, limiting efforts to get the shot to high-risk communities.

Carl Schmid of the HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute worries the opportunity is slipping away.

“We’re basically pulling the rug out of HIV prevention and testing and outreach programs.”

A Global Lifeline—But Not for Everyone

Worldwide, 1.3 million people are newly infected with HIV each year. Yet Gilead’s plan to expand lenacapavir access outside the U.S. is limited — and leaves out many middle-income countries.

• Gilead has partnered with six generic manufacturers to provide low-cost versions to 120 low-income countries, mostly in Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean.
• Until those generics are available, Gilead will donate enough doses for 2 million people at no profit.

But that’s not enough, says Winnie Byanyima, executive director of UNAIDS.

“If it’s unaffordable,” she said, “it will change nothing.”

Countries in Latin America and elsewhere that don’t qualify as “low-income” could be stuck in limbo — unable to afford the brand-name version and ineligible for the generics.

Dr. Gordon Crofoot, a Houston physician who helped lead the U.S. trial, summed it up:

“Everyone in every country who’s at risk of HIV needs access to PrEP. We need easier access to PrEP that’s highly effective — like this is.”

The Bottom Line

Lenacapavir has the potential to become the most effective tool yet in the global fight to end HIV — offering protection that’s powerful, discreet, and refreshingly low-maintenance. But its success won’t just depend on science. It depends on the systems in place — or falling apart — to deliver it.

If access barriers aren’t addressed, this twice-a-year shot may join a long list of HIV breakthroughs that could save lives… if only people could get them.

Source: AP News – The world’s only twice-a-year shot to prevent HIV could stop transmission — if people can get it

The post The New HIV Shot That Could Stop Transmission — If People Can Get It appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

LIRA, Uganda — In a quiet village in northern Uganda, a sturdy bicycle leans against the wall of Lucy Abalo’s home. It’s not just hers — it belongs to the entire community.

Need a ride to the health center for a pregnancy check-up? Pick up HIV medication? Rush a child to the hospital? Just knock on Lucy’s door.

“The goodness about this bike,” she says, “is its availability to all.”

That rugged, steel-framed ride is called the Buffalo Bicycle — and it’s changing lives in places where the roads are rough and healthcare is far from reach.

Built for the Journey: The Buffalo Bicycle

The Buffalo Bicycle, designed by World Bicycle Relief, a Chicago-based nonprofit, is no ordinary bike. Built with heavy-duty steel and reinforced components, it’s made to handle the brutal terrain of rural Africa — from washed-out roads to narrow dirt tracks.

Retailing for around $200, it’s significantly more expensive than the average bicycle — and out of reach for most rural health workers who often work without a salary. But for those who have one, it’s a game-changer.

“It wasn’t easy at first,” Abalo recalls with a laugh. “I felt like I was learning to ride all over again.”

Delivering Healthcare on Two Wheels

Lucy Abalo is one of 331 community health extension workers (CHEWs) in Uganda who received a Buffalo Bicycle in a partnership between World Bicycle Relief and Uganda’s Ministry of Health. In her village, she’s known as a “village doctor” — a go-to for emergencies and health guidance.

She looks after nearly 8,000 people, visiting homes, triaging patients, and reporting to a government clinic 5 kilometers (3 miles) away — often multiple times a week. For health workers like her, transport isn’t a luxury — it’s a lifeline.

A recent study by World Bicycle Relief found that CHEWs with bicycles were able to double the number of households they reached each week and cut their travel time to clinics nearly in half.

“Mobility is not a luxury in healthcare,” said CEO Dave Neiswander. “It’s a lifeline.”

One Bike, Many Lives

The impact goes far beyond numbers.

One evening earlier this year, a 4-year-old boy in the village suffered a severe cut while playing. His parents were away. Abalo, bike at the ready, rushed him to a nearby facility where he briefly lost consciousness before being revived.

“That bike, not me, saved the life of that child,” she said. “If it hadn’t been there, I don’t know what would have happened.”

Her neighbor, Babra Akello, has borrowed the bicycle six times — the first time to attend an antenatal appointment. She praises both the bike and Abalo’s readiness to help.

A Broader Push for Better Health Access

Uganda, a country of 45 million, still faces major healthcare access challenges. Many rural facilities lack ambulances or even fuel, and health workers often travel long distances on foot.

Since 2023, Buffalo Bicycles Uganda has focused on two districts, including Lira, 274 miles north of the capital, Kampala. With growing demand, health officials like Diana Atwine, the Ministry of Health’s permanent secretary, are calling for more bikes across the country.

“Front-line health workers save an unknown number of lives each year,” Atwine said. “We must give them the tools they need.”

More Than a Bike

For rural Uganda, the Buffalo Bicycle is more than transportation — it’s an extension of the healthcare system itself. It’s a mobile clinic, a community ambulance, and in many cases, a second chance at life.

And in villages like Lucy Abalo’s, it’s always ready for the next knock at the door.

Source: AP News – Bikes tough enough for Uganda’s roads are helping health workers save lives

The post This Bike Could Save Your Life: Uganda’s Healthcare Heroes on Wheels appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The NHS app is about to become the go-to way for millions more patients in England to receive important health information — from test results and screening invitations to appointment reminders. The government says this shift will save the NHS £200 million over the next three years, all while making healthcare communication faster and more convenient.

From Letters to Smartphones: A Digital Revolution in Healthcare

Currently, the NHS sends out at least 50 million letters to patients every year. But with a £50 million investment, the focus is shifting towards sending millions more messages directly to smartphones via the NHS app. This means fewer letters cluttering up mailboxes and quicker access to vital information at your fingertips.

This year alone, the Department of Health and Social Care expects around 270 million messages to be sent through the app — a jump of 70 million compared to last year.

Smarter Notifications to Cut Missed Appointments

One of the key benefits? Push notifications will remind patients about upcoming appointments. With approximately eight million elective care appointments missed in 2023/24, these reminders could help reduce no-shows and keep clinics running smoothly.

The app is also being enhanced to allow users to add appointments directly to their phone calendars and even request help from their local GP surgeries — making healthcare management easier than ever.

Making Healthcare More Accessible — But Not Leaving Anyone Behind

More than 11 million people in the UK log into the NHS app every month, and nearly 20 million are signed up to receive messages through it. NHS services via the app are now available in 87% of hospitals across England.

But the government is mindful that not everyone can or wants to use digital tools. For those who can’t access app messages — like many elderly patients — the NHS will still send text messages and, if needed, follow up with letters. This approach also aims to free up NHS phone lines, helping staff focus on patients who need more direct support.

A Step Toward a More Modern, Convenient NHS

Health Secretary Wes Streeting describes this investment as a way to bring the NHS into the digital age — making the patient experience as seamless as online banking or ordering food delivery.

“The move away from paper communication will also free up funds for frontline services,” Streeting adds.

Rachel Power, chief executive of the Patient’s Association, welcomed the upgrade, calling it a “significant step in modernising how patients receive information.”

Concerns About Digital Exclusion

However, not everyone is fully on board. The British Medical Association (BMA) has warned that relying too heavily on apps could risk leaving behind patients who don’t have access to or struggle with digital technology.

The government’s plan follows earlier announcements this year to expand the app’s features — including letting more patients book treatments and appointments directly through it.

What’s Next? Prescription Tracking and More

Last month, NHS England revealed that millions of patients would soon get “Amazon-style” tracking updates for their prescriptions via the app — so they can see if their medicines are ready to collect or have been sent out for delivery. This small but powerful feature aims to reduce waiting times and improve communication.

In short, the NHS app is evolving rapidly, aiming to give patients more control over their healthcare journeys while saving time and money for the system. But as the NHS embraces digital tools, it’s crucial to ensure no patient is left behind.

Source: BBC – Millions more to get test results via NHS app, government says

The post NHS App Set to Replace Millions of Letters, Saving £200m appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a major step forward for women’s health, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the Teal Wand — the first at-home device for cervical cancer screening. This breakthrough means women may soon be able to skip the speculum and stirrups and screen for cervical cancer from the comfort of their own home.

A Game-Changer for Cervical Cancer Screening

Developed by Teal Health, the Teal Wand allows users to collect their own vaginal samples at home and send them to a lab for HPV testing. The device will be included in Teal Health’s upcoming at-home screening kit, which will be available by prescription starting this June — launching first in California, with plans to expand across the U.S.

“This is the same test, with the same accuracy as in-clinic collection — but now you can do it from home,” said Teal Health CEO Kara Egan. “It gives women more options, especially through telehealth, and increases access to essential care.”

How It Works

Here’s how the process unfolds:

1. Request a Kit: Patients begin by visiting Teal Health’s website to request a kit.
2. Telehealth Visit: A quick consultation with a provider results in a prescription.
3. At-Home Collection: The patient uses the Teal Wand to collect a sample in private.
4. Mail to Lab: The sample is sent to a lab and analyzed using Roche’s HPV testing platform.
5. Results & Follow-Up: Results are reviewed by a clinician and shared with the patient. If needed, follow-up care is arranged.

Why It Matters

HPV (human papillomavirus) is the leading cause of cervical cancer, and early detection is critical. Yet millions of people in the U.S. are not up to date on their screenings. According to the CDC, about one in four adults fall behind on cervical cancer screening guidelines.

“This new test could be a game-changer,” said Dr. Ami Vaidya, co-chief of gynecologic oncology at Hackensack University Medical Center. “Some women avoid Pap smears due to discomfort or fear. Giving them a reliable at-home option could increase regular screenings, especially for those without easy access to a doctor.”

Support from Experts

The American Cancer Society praised the FDA’s decision.
“Most cervical cancers are found in people who were never screened or haven’t been screened recently,” said Dr. William Dahut, the organization’s chief scientific officer. “This at-home test adds a powerful tool in our fight against a potentially deadly disease.”

Understanding Cervical Cancer Screening

Cervical cancer screening typically involves:

• Pap tests (cytology): Detects abnormal cell changes in the cervix.
• HPV testing: Checks for the virus that can cause those changes.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends:

• Women ages 21–29: Pap test every 3 years.
• Women ages 30–65: Either Pap test every 3 years, HPV test every 5 years, or both tests every 5 years.

Teal Health’s self-collection kit is designed to match the accuracy of these traditional methods while removing barriers like scheduling appointments or facing uncomfortable procedures.

What’s Next?

Teal Health is currently in talks with insurance providers to cover the cost of the kit. For those without insurance, pricing will be announced soon. A waitlist is already open on the company’s website.

With FDA approval now in place, the future of cervical cancer screening is looking more accessible — and more comfortable — than ever.

Source: CNN – FDA approves first cervical cancer screening device that can be used at home, company says

The post FDA Approves First At-Home Test for Cervical Cancer Screening appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

This donation is one of the largest ever, surpassing even the legendary contributions of industrialists like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie when adjusted for inflation. Only Warren Buffett’s pledge to donate his fortune, valued at around $160 billion, could surpass it, depending on market fluctuations.

A Lasting Legacy with an Expedited Timeline

Gates’ donation will be spread over the next two decades, enabling the foundation to continue its vital work, including funding medical advancements and educational initiatives, with an additional $200 billion in resources. Gates is thrilled to have such significant funds to contribute to these causes, saying, “It’s kind of thrilling to have that much to be able to put into these causes.”

This announcement not only reaffirms Gates’ commitment to global health and education but also signals the end of the foundation’s global influence. “I think 20 years is the right balance between giving as much as we can to make progress on these things and giving people a lot of notice that now this money will be gone,” Gates said, acknowledging that the 20-year timeframe offers clarity while still allowing for substantial impact.

The Foundation’s Unmatched Influence and Reach

Since its inception in 2000, the Gates Foundation has been a trailblazer in global health, often working in partnership with governments and private sectors to provide affordable treatments for low- and middle-income countries. With an estimated 41% of its funds coming from Warren Buffett, the foundation has spent over $100 billion on global health initiatives.

Despite facing criticism over its considerable influence on world health policy, the foundation has consistently delivered positive results, particularly in reducing childhood deaths and preventing diseases like polio and malaria. Gates credits the foundation’s global health work as “way more impactful than I expected,” calling it his “second and final career.”

A Push for Immediate Impact, A Plan for the Future

Looking ahead, Gates is focused on ensuring that the remaining funds will address critical issues such as polio eradication, controlling deadly diseases, and alleviating malnutrition. “Having that time horizon and the resources just puts an even greater burden on us to say, ‘Are you actually putting your resources on what are going to be the biggest, most successful bets?’” said Mark Suzman, the foundation’s CEO.

The foundation’s $9 billion annual budget is expected to be directed towards top priorities, with some uncertainty about which programs will be sustained in the final 20 years.

The Changing Landscape of Philanthropy

The foundation has undergone significant changes recently, with Bill and Melinda French Gates divorcing in 2021 and Buffett stepping down as a trustee. In 2024, French Gates left to focus on her own organization, Pivotal Ventures, leaving Bill Gates as the sole remaining founder. French Gates cited her desire to combat the rollback of women’s rights in the U.S. as part of the reason for her departure.

Despite the challenges, including global conflicts and economic uncertainty, Gates remains optimistic about the foundation’s ability to continue making an impact. “It’s incredible to come up with these low-cost things, and tragic if we can’t get them out to everyone who needs them,” he said. Gates is determined to see these innovations reach those who need them most, stressing the importance of continued support from wealthy donors.

The Road Ahead: Uncertainty and Hope

Gates recognizes that the path ahead will be fraught with challenges. Ongoing crises such as the conflict in Ukraine and economic instability may result in fewer resources for global health initiatives. However, Gates believes in the potential for a renewed commitment to those in need: “It’s going to require renewing that commitment of those who are well off to help those who are in the greatest need.”

As Gates prepares to focus on his remaining years of giving, he remains hopeful that his legacy, and that of the foundation, will continue to shape the future of philanthropy long after it closes its doors in 2045.

Source: AP News – Bill Gates pledges his remaining fortune to the Gates Foundation, which will close in 20 years

The post Bill Gates Commits 99% of Fortune to Gates Foundation’s Final 20 Years appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

DENVER, CO — In a powerful effort to build trust around vaccines in a historically Black community, local parents and healthcare advocates in Denver came together to share their personal stories about flu shots. But after years of work, their voices were silenced before their impact could even be measured.

The federally funded project, backed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was abruptly shut down by the Trump administration — cutting off a study that many hoped could be a model for tackling vaccine hesitancy.

A Grassroots Effort to Build Trust

The initiative was led by pediatrician Dr. Joshua Williams at Denver Health, who teamed up with the nonprofit Center for African American Health. Their goal was simple but powerful: use storytelling to encourage flu vaccinations by sharing real-life experiences from within the community.

Over two years, volunteers attended workshops, shared personal journeys, and worked with professionals to turn their stories into short, heartfelt videos. These stories were then sent as text messages to 200 families served by two local clinics.

In one video, a mother shared how getting her first flu shot with her daughter marked a step in reclaiming her independence. In another, a grandmother reflected on missing a vaccine appointment — a mistake that led to her grandson being hospitalized on his fourth birthday.

Chantyl Busby, a local mom and community adviser to the project, said the initiative made her feel seen. “For someone like me, from the Black community who income-wise is on the lower end, we don’t often have a voice,” she said. “Having this funding taken away sends a horrible, horrible message.”

Canceled Before Results Could Be Measured

The study’s cancellation means no one will ever know if the videos influenced vaccine decisions. Years of community engagement and NIH funding went down the drain — and the researchers’ careers may be impacted, too.

Dr. Williams, who regularly talks to hesitant parents, had hoped the project would offer a scalable solution for addressing vaccine doubts — especially as the U.S. faces its worst pediatric flu season in 15 years, with at least 216 children dead.

“We need to understand what is creating this challenge to vaccines and why,” said infectious disease expert Michael Osterholm. “We are entering a scientific dark age.”

More Urgency, Less Support

The need for vaccine trust-building has never been greater. Measles and whooping cough cases are on the rise, largely driven by unvaccinated children. Yet federal support for public health education is shrinking, and vaccine hesitancy research is being deprioritized.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has publicly cast doubt on vaccines despite overwhelming scientific evidence supporting their safety. On top of that, Trump administration policies have created uncertainty around COVID-19 vaccine availability this fall.

A Doctor’s Mission Continues

Despite the setback, Dr. Williams isn’t giving up. He’s asked for permission to use some of the community-made videos in his clinic — even if he can’t measure their broader impact.

He often tells parents that his own kids are vaccinated. He also shares stories from his 95-year-old grandmother, who still remembers the fear of polio before the vaccine era.

“We’ve lost the collective memory of what it’s like to live with these diseases,” Williams said. “It’s going to take a community-wide voice to remind those in power why infection prevention and vaccine education matter.”

Source: AP News – A community rallied to share flu shot experiences. Then the government stopped the study

The post Denver Flu Shot Study Canceled After Years of Community Effort appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Stroke remains a major health crisis in the U.S., ranking as the fourth leading cause of death in 2023, with more than half a million Americans affected each year. Yet, recent guidelines highlight that up to 80% of strokes could be prevented with healthier lifestyles and better risk management. The American Stroke Association, in its first update on stroke prevention in a decade, shares critical insights into reducing stroke risk through diet, exercise, and early identification of risk factors.

The most effective strategies for reducing stroke risk mirror those for improving overall health: a balanced diet, regular physical activity, and no smoking. While these habits are proven to lower stroke risk, the modern world—full of distractions like smartphones and fast food—can make these lifestyle changes challenging. Dr. Sean Duke, a stroke doctor at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, acknowledges these societal hurdles. “Our world is stacked against us,” he says, emphasizing the need for sustained efforts in making healthier choices.

A stroke occurs when blood flow to part of the brain is blocked or when a blood vessel bursts. This interruption in blood supply depletes the brain’s oxygen, potentially leading to brain damage, difficulty thinking, speaking, walking, and in severe cases, death.

A nutritious diet can lower stroke risk by controlling key factors like high cholesterol, high blood sugar, and obesity. The American Heart Association recommends a Mediterranean-style diet, which includes:

• Fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and olive oil
• Lean protein from beans, nuts, poultry, fish, and seafood
• A reduction in red meat and saturated fats
• Avoidance of processed foods and sugary drinks

Eating this way helps control weight, which in turn supports overall heart and brain health. Plus, eating healthy keeps cholesterol levels in check, significantly lowering stroke risk.

Physical activity, even simple daily movement like walking for just 10 minutes, can reduce stroke risk drastically. Dr. Cheryl Bushnell, a neurologist at Wake Forest University, stresses that exercise helps lower blood pressure, one of the primary stroke risk factors.

The American Heart Association suggests a goal of at least 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity per week or 75 minutes of vigorous activity. Whether you prefer walking, running, cycling, or even home workouts, getting active regularly can go a long way in preventing stroke.

Obesity is another significant stroke risk, but new medications have been approved to assist in weight management. Drugs like Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Zepbound are now being prescribed to individuals with obesity or diabetes, offering new tools in the fight against stroke. However, experts caution that medication alone isn’t enough. A balanced diet and regular exercise remain critical components for long-term health.

The new guidelines also emphasize the importance of screening for risk factors beyond just medical conditions. Doctors are encouraged to consider non-medical factors, such as economic stability, access to healthcare, and even discrimination, which can influence a person’s likelihood of having a stroke. For example, Black Americans face nearly double the risk of stroke compared to white Americans, underscoring the importance of addressing health disparities.

Additionally, doctors are now advised to screen women for conditions that could increase their risk of stroke, such as high blood pressure during pregnancy or early menopause.

Recognizing the symptoms of a stroke quickly can save lives. The acronym FAST can help you remember the signs:

• F: Face weakness
• A: Arm weakness
• S: Speech difficulty
• T: Time—call 911 immediately!

If you or someone you know shows any of these signs, getting medical help fast is essential to minimizing brain damage.

While stroke may seem like a daunting health issue, there’s good news: it’s preventable with the right lifestyle choices and early intervention. By following the new guidelines, individuals can make healthier choices to reduce their stroke risk, and healthcare providers can better identify at-risk populations to prevent strokes before they happen. It’s time to take action for a healthier future.

Source: AP News – Here are new guidelines for preventing stroke, the nation’s fourth biggest killer

The post New Guidelines Reveal How to Prevent Strokes: Key Tips for Better Health appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

New research reveals that abortion bans in the United States are worsening existing health disparities, leading to increased births in high-risk populations and a significant rise in infant mortality.

Increased Births Following Abortion Bans

Since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision revoked the federal right to abortion, 14 states have implemented complete or six-week abortion bans. A study published in the medical journal JAMA found that in these states, the fertility rate increased by 1.7%, resulting in one additional birth per 1,000 women of reproductive age.

However, the consequences extend beyond an increase in births.

Infant Mortality Spikes in Banned States

A parallel study from the same research team uncovered an alarming rise in infant mortality in states with abortion bans. The infant death rate surged by nearly 6%, with about 500 more deaths than expected among the 22,000 additional births.

For births directly linked to abortion bans, the infant mortality rate stood at 24 deaths per 1,000 births—four times higher than expected. Researchers analyzed birth and death rates from 2012 to 2023, comparing trends before the bans with states that did not impose restrictions.

“These additional births are occurring disproportionately among populations at greater risk of infant mortality and other poor pregnancy outcomes,” said Dr. Suzanne Bell, assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and co-author of the studies.

Disproportionate Impact on Vulnerable Populations

The research highlights how abortion bans disproportionately impact marginalized communities.

• Black women and other minorities experienced the largest increases in fertility rates.
• Lower-income groups, including Medicaid beneficiaries and those with lower education levels, also saw a sharp rise in births.
• Infant mortality surged nearly 11% among Black babies—almost double the average increase—making them the most affected racial or ethnic group.

“Abortion bans are associated with excess births that shift the composition of births toward those at higher risk of infant death,” the researchers wrote.

Experts have long warned about the dangers of abortion bans, emphasizing their impact on the health and well-being of families.

“The argument in the Dobbs case was that removing abortion rights wouldn’t affect measurable outcomes,” said Caitlin Myers, a professor of economics at Middlebury College who studies abortion trends. “Well, here’s one: increased infant mortality.”

Rise in Deaths Due to Congenital Anomalies

The studies also found a significant increase in infant deaths from congenital anomalies in states with abortion bans. These conditions, which can range from heart defects to severe spinal issues, often result in infants surviving only a few months.

• Infant deaths due to congenital anomalies rose by 11%, equating to one additional death per 10,000 births.
• Infant deaths from other causes also increased by 4% in states with abortion bans.

This suggests that even allowing abortion exceptions for fetal anomalies would not fully mitigate the negative effects of abortion bans on infant health.

“Many pregnant people were unable to overcome barriers to abortion access and were forced to carry unwanted or unsafe pregnancies to term,” said Bell. “The largest impacts are among populations already facing structural disadvantages and poor maternal and child health outcomes.”

Broader Maternal Health Impacts

The crisis extends beyond infant mortality. A CDC report found that Black women were the only group to experience an increase in maternal mortality from 2022 to 2023. The maternal death rate for Black women in 2023 was 50 deaths per 100,000 live births—nearly three times higher than other racial groups.

“[Abortion restrictions] are compounding existing health disparities by limiting reproductive autonomy,” Bell noted. “And the rise in infant deaths is likely just the tip of the iceberg.”

Texas: A Major Contributor to the Crisis

Texas played a significant role in the findings, accounting for:

• 75% of additional births
• 80% of additional infant deaths

Experts suggest several factors contributed to this outsized impact, including:

• The state’s early adoption of Senate Bill 8, which restricted abortion before the Dobbs decision.
• Long travel distances required for Texans seeking out-of-state abortion care.

Calls for Policy Change

In a commentary accompanying the research, Dr. Alyssa Bilinski, an assistant professor of health policy at Brown University, stressed the need for increased support for affected families.

“Abortion restrictions that force people to continue unexpected and high-risk pregnancies make it even more critical to ensure strong support systems for children and families,” she wrote in JAMA.

“There should be no partisan divide over the idea that all children and families deserve the opportunity to thrive.”

Conclusion

The studies provide clear evidence that abortion bans are not only increasing births but also worsening health outcomes for mothers and infants—especially among vulnerable populations. Experts warn that without policy changes and expanded healthcare support, the crisis is likely to deepen.

Source

The post Abortion Bans in the U.S. Linked to More Births and Higher Infant Deaths appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.