HONG KONG — Thousands of Chinese students in the United States are on edge after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a sweeping new policy that could revoke the visas of students linked to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in sensitive academic fields.

The move, unveiled on Wednesday, has left many scrambling for answers and reconsidering their future in the U.S.

A Shockwave Through the Chinese Student Community

For Linqin, a Chinese student at Johns Hopkins University, the news was deeply unsettling. “This feels like a modern-day version of the Chinese Exclusion Act,” he said, referencing the 19th-century law that banned Chinese immigrants and blocked them from gaining citizenship. For the first time, he’s seriously considering leaving the U.S.—a country he’s called home for nearly a third of his life.

With over 270,000 Chinese students currently enrolled in American universities—making up about a quarter of all international students in the U.S.—the policy is expected to have far-reaching consequences.

Beijing Slams Move as Politically Motivated

China’s Foreign Ministry swiftly condemned the U.S. decision. Spokesperson Mao Ning called it “unreasonable” and accused Washington of hypocrisy. “This discriminatory action reveals the U.S. lie about freedom and openness,” she said, noting that China had formally lodged a protest.

Visa tensions between the two countries aren’t new. Back in 2019, during Trump’s presidency, China warned students of tightening visa restrictions and an uptick in rejections. And just last year, Beijing protested after several Chinese students were allegedly interrogated and deported upon arriving in the U.S.

Frustration and Uncertainty on Campus

The policy has upended plans for students like Zou Renge, a 27-year-old studying public policy at the University of Chicago. She had planned to work in humanitarian aid overseas after graduation. Now, she’s staying put.

“With all this uncertainty, I’m just trying to figure out a solution,” she said.

For others, the U.S. is no longer the dream destination it once was. State media in China continues to emphasize American gun violence and civil unrest, discouraging students from studying abroad. The ongoing strain in U.S.–China relations has led some students to instead choose schools in the U.K., Australia, or Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Sees an Opportunity

Sensing a moment to attract global talent, Hong Kong officials are extending an open hand. On Thursday, city leader John Lee said Hong Kong would welcome students “discriminated against by American policies.”

“This is an opportunity for Hong Kong,” Lee told lawmakers. “We’ll work with our universities to provide the best support.”

Universities across the city—including HKUST, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and City University—are already easing application processes for international students from elite U.S. institutions. HKUST even extended an invitation to Harvard students after former President Trump threatened their visa status.

Hong Kong, known for its academic freedom and international environment, has long been a preferred destination for mainland Chinese students. The city introduced a new visa scheme in 2022 to reverse an exodus of professionals and students during the COVID pandemic and after Beijing imposed a national security law.

Looking for a Way Forward

Education consultants like Will Kwong in Hong Kong say they’re now helping students with U.S. admission offers seek alternatives in the U.K. and Australia.

Meanwhile, some see the U.S. move as self-defeating.

“Fewer international exchanges will hurt America’s development,” said Zhang Qi, a postdoctoral researcher in Beijing. “This could actually benefit China by encouraging top talent to stay and contribute to local institutions like Tsinghua and the Chinese Academy of Sciences.”

And for those waiting to begin their U.S. education, the uncertainty is unbearable.

Chen, an incoming student at Purdue University, is still in China awaiting his visa. He’s frustrated and disillusioned.

“I thought the U.S. stood for freedom and diversity. But this feels like the opposite,” he said.

Source: AP News – Chinese students anxious and angry after Rubio vows to revoke visas

The post Chinese Students in U.S. Face Uncertainty After New Visa Crackdown appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

WASHINGTON — In a move that could disrupt the plans of thousands of international students, the U.S. State Department has temporarily stopped scheduling new visa interviews for those hoping to study in the United States, officials confirmed.

The pause, which does not affect students who already have interview appointments, comes as the department prepares to roll out stricter guidelines for screening applicants’ social media activity.

According to an internal cable signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and obtained by the Associated Press, consulates have been instructed to stop adding appointments for student and exchange visitor visas until new vetting guidance is issued.

“Effective immediately, in preparation for an expansion of required social media screening and vetting, consulate sections should not add any additional student or exchange visitor visa appointment capacity,” the memo reads.

A Crackdown With Ripple Effects

The change marks yet another move in a broader crackdown on international student programs that began under former President Donald Trump. While the Biden administration continued the policy of social media screening for visa applicants, this latest step could have more immediate consequences.

State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the U.S. will continue to use “every tool we can” to evaluate visa applicants, including students.

“We will continue to use every tool we can to assess who it is that’s coming here, whether they are students or otherwise,” Bruce said during a press briefing.

The decision, first reported by Politico, follows a series of high-profile efforts to restrict or revoke international student privileges.

Just last week, the administration revoked Harvard University’s authority to enroll international students under the student visa program—a decision that was challenged in court and temporarily blocked by a federal judge.

Earlier this year, thousands of international students already in the U.S. lost their legal status after a separate policy change. Although many successfully fought back in court and had their status restored, the administration quietly broadened the criteria for future terminations.

What This Means for Students and Schools

The suspension of new interview appointments could cause serious delays for students planning to start classes this summer or fall. With limited time before the next academic term, any prolonged pause could derail travel and enrollment timelines.

Universities, especially those already grappling with budget constraints, could also feel the impact. Many institutions rely heavily on international students—who often pay full tuition—to offset reductions in federal research funding and other revenue shortfalls.

If the freeze continues into peak visa season, colleges may face an unexpected enrollment crunch, and students may be left scrambling for alternatives.

Source: AP News – US stops scheduling visa interviews for foreign students while it expands social media vetting

The post Visa Interview Pause Disrupts Plans for Foreign Students Heading to U.S. appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a high-stakes legal move, Harvard University is suing the Trump administration after being abruptly stripped of its ability to enroll international students—putting nearly 7,000 scholars in limbo and igniting a fresh legal battle over academic freedom and immigration policy.

A Stunning Federal Revocation

On Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) notified Harvard it was no longer certified under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), a status required to host international students. The move came with immediate consequences: incoming students may not enter the country, and current students on F-1 or J-1 visas must transfer or risk deportation.

“This action threatens to erase nearly a third of our student body,” Harvard said in its lawsuit, calling the decision retaliatory and unlawful.

Harvard Pushes Back in Court

Harvard filed suit Friday against DHS, the Departments of Justice and State, and key Trump officials including DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and Attorney General Pam Bondi. The university seeks an emergency court order to block the policy, arguing the administration is punishing it for exercising First Amendment rights and resisting federal overreach into campus governance and ideology.

“This is part of a broader campaign to force Harvard to abandon its values,” the complaint reads.

President Alan Garber assured international students they are not alone:
“You are our classmates, our mentors, our partners. We will fight for you and for the integrity of Harvard.”

Political Ideology vs. Academic Independence

The administration’s actions appear rooted in broader ideological battles. Officials have accused Harvard and other universities of harboring anti-American sentiment and promoting pro-Hamas and antisemitic ideologies—claims the university strongly denies.

DHS Secretary Noem justified the decertification by citing Harvard’s “insufficient” compliance with a request for foreign student conduct records. Harvard contends it submitted the documents and received no explanation for their alleged inadequacy.

Harvard now faces a 72-hour deadline to provide five years of additional records or risk permanent decertification—demands the university argues lack any legal basis.

Financial and Academic Fallout

The revocation adds to a mounting list of federal pressure tactics. Harvard is already in court challenging a $2.65 billion freeze in federal research funding. The IRS is also reportedly reviewing the university’s tax-exempt status.

University officials warn that banning foreign students will deal a severe blow to research labs, academic programs, and innovation pipelines.

“This could devastate not just Harvard but American higher education as a whole,” said economist and former Obama advisor Jason Furman. “International students are a core strength of our universities—and of U.S. global influence.”

Students in Shock, Uncertain About the Future

International students are grappling with fear and uncertainty. For Jared, an 18-year-old admitted student from New Zealand, the news was crushing.

“It felt like my heart dropped,” he said. “This was a dream. Now everything is up in the air.”

Others worry about losing their visas, transferring schools, or missing out on the financial aid and opportunities Harvard offers.

Karl Molden, an Austrian junior, said students feel caught in a political crossfire.
“We’re being used as pawns in a bigger fight between democracy and authoritarianism.”

Backlash From Faculty and Global Leaders

Harvard faculty members and academic groups have fiercely condemned the move.

“It’s horrendous on every level,” said Furman. “This isn’t about security—it’s about ideology.”

The American Association of University Professors called the administration’s actions “an unconstitutional assault” on the international academic community. Australia’s ambassador to the U.S. has also stepped in, offering support to affected students.

Broader Crackdown on Higher Education

Harvard’s clash with the Trump administration is not an isolated incident. The White House has demanded sweeping changes from multiple universities—including purging diversity initiatives, auditing faculty viewpoints, and cracking down on campus protests, especially related to the Israel-Hamas war.

While Harvard has acknowledged instances of antisemitism and pledged reforms, university leaders argue the government’s demands cross legal and ethical lines.

“This is not about safety or compliance,” said one Harvard professor. “It’s about political control.”

A Defining Moment

As the legal battle unfolds, Harvard remains defiant—and resolute.

“We are committed to protecting our international students and the values that define us,” said spokesperson Jason Newton. “This is about more than policy—it’s about who we are as a university and as a country.”

Source: CNN – Harvard sues Trump administration to halt federal ban on enrolling international students

The post Harvard Fights Back: Sues Trump Administration Over Ban on International Students appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The Trump administration has taken a dramatic step in its ongoing conflict with higher education institutions, revoking Harvard University’s ability to enroll international students. The move, announced Thursday by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), could reshape the university’s academic landscape and significantly impact thousands of students from around the world.

Here’s a breakdown of what’s happening, what it means for the Harvard community, and what remains uncertain.

What Just Happened?

The Department of Homeland Security terminated Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), which allows U.S. institutions to host international students on F-1 and J-1 visas. Without this certification, Harvard is legally barred from enrolling any new or existing international students under these visa programs.

This decision follows a high-profile standoff between Harvard and the Trump administration, which froze $2.2 billion in federal funding last month. The freeze came after Harvard refused to comply with demands to overhaul its international student program, becoming one of the first elite universities to push back against the administration’s education policies.

Harvard has strongly condemned the DHS decision, calling it “unlawful” and pledging swift action to support affected students.

Why This Matters: The Impact on Harvard’s International Community

International students are a vital part of Harvard’s academic fabric. In the 2024–2025 academic year alone, the university enrolled 6,793 international students—nearly 27% of its student body. Including visiting scholars and researchers, the international academic community at Harvard totals nearly 10,000 individuals from more than 140 countries.

Losing SEVP certification means these students must either transfer to another certified university or risk falling out of legal immigration status.

“We are committed to maintaining our ability to host our international students and scholars… who enrich the University and this nation,” Harvard stated in response.

What Happens to Current Students?

According to a letter from DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, Harvard may not enroll any international students on F-1 or J-1 visas for the upcoming academic year. Students already enrolled must transfer to another SEVP-certified institution to retain their legal status in the U.S.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) requires all SEVP-certified schools to track key information about international students, such as their address and academic status. If a school loses certification, affected students typically have a short window to transfer or leave the country.

ICE has also emphasized strict compliance, warning that it will sanction schools that fail to meet their obligations.

Academic and Financial Fallout

The repercussions could be far-reaching for Harvard and beyond. Faculty members are expressing alarm over the potential academic consequences. Some warn that labs and research programs could be hollowed out without international scholars.

“Many labs will empty out,” one professor told CNN.

Jason Furman, a Harvard economist and former advisor to President Obama, didn’t mince words:

“It is impossible to imagine Harvard without our amazing international students. They are a huge benefit to everyone here, to innovation, and to the United States more broadly.”

The policy could also hurt Harvard financially. International students often pay full tuition since they’re typically ineligible for federal aid—an important revenue source. In April, DHS Secretary Noem argued that Harvard “relies heavily on foreign student funding … to build and maintain their substantial endowment.”

University spokesperson Jason Newton warned that the action would inflict “serious harm” on the Harvard community and compromise the school’s educational mission.

What’s Next?

Harvard has vowed to challenge the decision and provide urgent support to its international students. But for now, many questions remain about how quickly the university can respond—and whether the policy will withstand legal scrutiny.

As one of the world’s leading academic institutions finds itself at the center of a political battle, the consequences could ripple across the entire landscape of American higher education.

Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly attributed a quote about Harvard’s reliance on foreign student funding. It was made by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in April.

The post Harvard Barred from Enrolling International Students: What It Means appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Fear and uncertainty are gripping many US college campuses ahead of President-elect Donald Trump’s January 20 inauguration. Universities are urging international students to return early from winter break, citing the potential for another travel ban similar to the one that disrupted lives during Trump’s first term.

Rising Concerns Over Immigration Policies

With over 1.1 million international students enrolled in the 2023-24 academic year, concerns are mounting about Trump’s proposed immigration policies. These include expanding his previous travel ban on predominantly Muslim countries and revoking visas for “radical anti-American and antisemitic foreigners.”

International students generally hold nonimmigrant visas that allow study in the US but offer no clear path to residency. For students like Pramath Pratap Misra, a 23-year-old Indian graduate from New York University (NYU), it’s a time of heightened anxiety. NYU, which hosted more than 27,000 international students last year, exemplifies the precarious situation faced by foreign students.

Travel Advisory: Return Before Inauguration

Several universities, including Cornell University and the University of Southern California (USC), are strongly advising international students to cut short or avoid travel plans outside the US before the inauguration. Cornell’s Office of Global Learning warned students to return before January 21, citing potential travel bans targeting countries like Iran, Libya, Nigeria, and even major nations such as China and India.

USC, home to over 17,000 international students, urged students to return a week before Trump takes office, emphasizing that executive orders affecting travel and visa processing could be imminent.

Implications Beyond Travel

Trump’s promise of “mass deportations” casts a wide shadow, affecting students across industries such as agriculture, construction, and healthcare. At the same time, he has proposed granting green cards to foreign graduates of US universities — but only to the “most skilled” individuals. A campaign spokesperson clarified this would exclude groups Trump perceives as “radical” or “anti-American.”

Universities Offer Support Amid Uncertainty

Institutions like UCLA reassured students that immigration information would remain confidential unless required by law. NYU emphasized its commitment to cross-border mobility, vowing to monitor and address immigration-related policies.

Other universities are stepping up with guidance and resources:

• University of Massachusetts Amherst encouraged early returns “out of an abundance of caution.”
• Northeastern University, second only to NYU in international student enrollment, recommended returning by January 6 to avoid disruptions.
• Harvard University advised budgeting extra time ahead of the semester.

Uncertainty for the Future

Some students, like Gabrielle Balreira Fontenelle Mota, a Brazilian junior at NYU, expressed concerns about ideological screenings Trump has promised to implement. While not directly from a targeted country, she fears broader restrictions could still impact her future.

Stuart Anderson, Executive Director of the National Foundation for American Policy, noted during a briefing that Trump’s second term would likely echo his first, with sweeping restrictions on foreign-born students and workers.

Conclusion

As the inauguration nears, international students and universities alike are bracing for potential policy shifts. From travel bans to ideological screenings, the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s immigration agenda underscores the challenges for the global academic community. Institutions are urging vigilance and preparation to safeguard educational pursuits amid an unpredictable political landscape.

Source

The post US Universities Urge International Students to Return Before Trump’s Inauguration appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.