Published Time: September-22-2025, 14:30 EDT

One of the largest memorial services ever held for a private citizen took place Sunday in Arizona, where nearly 90,000 people gathered to honor Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. The massive turnout filled State Farm Stadium, spillover arenas, and nearby viewing areas, underscoring Kirk’s lasting impact on politics, media, and faith communities.

A Historic Memorial Gathering

Charlie Kirk, the late founder of conservative youth organization Turning Point USA (TPUSA), was honored Sunday in what has been described as one of the largest memorial services for a private citizen in U.S. history.

According to estimates provided by TPUSA, about 70,000 mourners filled State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, with another 10,000 at the Desert Diamond Arena overflow site and an additional 10,000 gathered in surrounding areas.

In total, nearly 90,000 attended in person, while millions more watched nationwide broadcasts. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung confirmed that Kirk’s memorial was aired live across every major U.S. television network.

Comparisons to Historic Memorials

The turnout places Kirk’s memorial alongside some of the largest public gatherings honoring cultural figures in modern American history.

• Elvis Presley’s funeral in 1977 drew around 80,000 people to Memphis, though only a small number were allowed inside.

• Muhammad Ali’s 2016 service in Louisville hosted about 14,000 people, with global audiences watching through live streams.

• Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s funeral in 1968 drew an estimated 150,000 to his Atlanta procession, with large services held at Ebenezer Baptist Church and Morehouse College.

By contrast, Kirk’s gathering brought tens of thousands inside a single stadium, a scale rarely seen for private citizens.

Political, Media, and Religious Leaders in Attendance

The memorial featured tributes from prominent political leaders, conservative media figures, and faith leaders who reflected on Kirk’s influence. Speakers highlighted his role in shaping a new generation of conservative activism, his bold public speaking style, and his deep ties to Christian communities.

TPUSA emphasized that the memorial was not only a celebration of Kirk’s life but also a rallying point for the continuation of his mission, known for blending media, politics, and faith-driven activism.

The Circumstances of Kirk’s Death

Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10, 2025, during an outdoor event at Utah Valley University. The event, part of TPUSA’s planned American Comeback Tour, had drawn thousands of students and community members.

Kirk was answering audience questions when a gunman opened fire, ending his life instantly. Law enforcement officials have not yet released full details about the investigation but confirmed the shooting was targeted.

The tragedy shocked supporters and critics alike, cutting short the career of a 31-year-old activist who built TPUSA into a national force in conservative politics.

A Legacy of Campus Activism

Born in 1993, Kirk co-founded Turning Point USA in 2012 at age 18. Within a decade, the group had grown into one of the largest conservative youth movements in the United States, hosting conferences, publishing media, and organizing nationwide campus tours.

Known for his sharp debating skills, Kirk frequently appeared on national television and digital platforms, where he sparred with political opponents and promoted conservative policy ideas.

His work made him a prominent figure in both political and religious communities, with strong ties to evangelical networks across the U.S.

Reactions From Officials and the Public

Federal and state officials condemned the assassination, with tributes pouring in from across the political spectrum. While some emphasized the polarizing nature of Kirk’s politics, most focused on the significance of his influence and the shock of his violent death.

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs released a statement calling the killing “an attack on democratic dialogue,” while members of Congress, including both Republicans and Democrats, expressed condolences to Kirk’s family.

A Gathering of Extraordinary Scale

Organizers noted that the massive crowd underscored Kirk’s reach across political, cultural, and faith-driven circles. Some estimates from local law enforcement suggested the number of attendees may have reached 200,000 when including those gathered outside official venues, though the more conservative estimate of 90,000 remains the official figure provided by TPUSA.

Regardless of the count, the turnout highlighted the extraordinary public response to his death and placed the Glendale memorial among the largest commemorations ever held for a private citizen in U.S. history.

Looking Ahead

While Charlie Kirk’s life was cut short, TPUSA leaders vowed to continue his mission. The group announced that its planned American Comeback Tour will continue later this year with guest speakers and youth organizers carrying forward Kirk’s message.

The Glendale memorial, filled with prayers, speeches, and moments of silence, served both as a farewell to a prominent activist and as a call to action for the movement he founded.

Source: FOX News – Charlie Kirk honored by 90K in one of the largest memorials for a private citizen

The post Charlie Kirk Memorial Draws 90,000 Attendees in Arizona, Among Largest for a Private Citizen appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

As he nears his 90th birthday, the Dalai Lama has made it official: he will not be the last spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism.

In a powerful pre-recorded video message shared with religious elders gathered in Dharamshala, India, on Wednesday, the 14th Dalai Lama confirmed that the centuries-old tradition of succession will continue after his death — despite increasing pressure from Beijing to control the process.

“I am affirming that the institution of the Dalai Lama will continue,” he said. “The Gaden Phodrang Trust has sole authority to recognize the future reincarnation. No one else has any such authority to interfere in this matter.”

The declaration reaffirms his commitment to preserving the deeply spiritual Tibetan Buddhist tradition — and sets the stage for a fierce battle over who gets to name his successor.

A Showdown Over Spiritual Authority

The announcement adds fresh fuel to an already simmering conflict between the Tibetan exile community and China’s Communist Party, which has long claimed it alone has the right to approve reincarnations of Tibetan lamas — including the next Dalai Lama.

Beijing responded to the news by reiterating its usual stance: that all reincarnation processes must be conducted in China, in line with Chinese laws and government approval.

But the Dalai Lama, speaking to his global community of followers, made it clear that any attempt by the Chinese government to control his succession will not be recognized.

In his recently published memoir, Voice for the Voiceless, he further emphasized that his reincarnation will be born in the “free world” — not under Chinese rule — and warned followers to reject any candidate backed by the Chinese Communist Party.

A Spiritual Struggle Rooted in Tradition

Tibetan Buddhists believe enlightened teachers like the Dalai Lama can choose to be reborn, continuing their spiritual mission. This tradition, however, has become deeply politicized — especially since Beijing controversially installed its own Panchen Lama (the second-highest figure in Tibetan Buddhism) in 1995.

The Dalai Lama had already recognized a six-year-old boy as the true reincarnation of the Panchen Lama — but the child quickly disappeared from public view, reportedly taken by Chinese authorities. The boy has not been seen since.

Experts say China plans to follow a similar playbook with the Dalai Lama’s succession.

“There’s been a long-term plan to engineer a Beijing-backed Dalai Lama,” said Tibetan historian Ruth Gamble. “China has been cultivating a network of high-ranking lamas within Tibet who will likely be used to legitimize their chosen successor.”

Legacy of Peace, Exile, and Resistance

Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, has lived in exile in India since 1959 after a failed uprising against Chinese rule in Tibet. From his base in Dharamshala, he has led the Tibetan exile community, advocated for religious freedom, and promoted his “middle way” approach — seeking meaningful autonomy for Tibet within China, rather than outright independence.

His nonviolent resistance earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989 and global admiration. But it also made him a target of Beijing, which brands him a separatist and a “wolf in monk’s robes.”

Despite his global recognition, the Dalai Lama has long voiced concern over Beijing’s efforts to politicize spiritual traditions — especially those related to reincarnation.

“It is totally inappropriate for Chinese Communists, who explicitly reject religion… to meddle in the system of reincarnation of lamas, let alone that of the Dalai Lama,” he wrote in his memoir.

Tibetan Leaders Push Back

Tibetan Buddhist leaders in exile, gathered in Dharamshala, responded to the Dalai Lama’s statement by issuing a “resolution of gratitude” — and a warning to Beijing.

They “strongly condemn the People’s Republic of China’s usage of reincarnation for political gain,” and vowed to “never accept” a Beijing-appointed Dalai Lama.

Samdhong Rinpoche, a senior official in the Dalai Lama’s office, added that no further details about the search process for the next Dalai Lama would be made public until the time comes.

What’s Next

The Dalai Lama previously said he would reassess the future of his role when he turned 90. With that milestone just days away, he’s made his choice clear: the spiritual torch will be passed on — but only through authentic Tibetan Buddhist tradition.

What comes next could shape the future of Tibet’s culture, religion, and identity. For many, it’s not just about choosing a successor — it’s about preserving a legacy.

Source: CNN – Dalai Lama vows he won’t be the last leader of Tibetan Buddhism

The post The Dalai Lama Says He Won’t Be the Last — Setting Up a Showdown with China appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Just weeks into his historic papacy, Pope Leo XIV — the first U.S.-born leader of the Catholic Church — is already earning high marks from American Catholics. But a new AP-NORC poll shows many across the country are still getting to know him.

According to the survey, about two-thirds of American Catholics say they view Pope Leo favorably, with fewer than 1 in 10 expressing a negative opinion. However, roughly 3 in 10 Catholics admit they don’t yet know enough about him to say either way.

Among the general public, views are also largely positive — for those who’ve formed an opinion. The poll found that 44% of U.S. adults overall have a favorable impression of the new pope, while a similar number say they’re still unsure. Again, only about 1 in 10 express an unfavorable view.

A Pope with Bipartisan Appeal

Despite America’s deep political divides, Pope Leo is making inroads across party lines. Roughly half of Democrats and about 4 in 10 Republicans and independents say they view him favorably. Republicans are more likely to say they’re still undecided — but they’re not more likely to view him negatively. Across the political spectrum, only about 1 in 10 express an unfavorable opinion.

For many, hope springs from the idea that Pope Leo can bridge divides — both inside and outside the Church.

“I’m optimistic. Certainly, the first pope from the United States is significant,” said Terry Barber, a 50-year-old Democrat from Sacramento, California. He’s hoping for “a more progressive and modern church,” and believes Leo might bring some fresh ideas even while staying rooted in tradition.

On the other side of the aisle, Victoria Becude, a 38-year-old Republican from Florida, said she’s also hopeful. “I’m rooting for him,” she said. “I hope that America can get back to faith, and I hope he can do that.”

Unity Over Division

One of Pope Leo’s early promises has been to foster unity in a Church that has struggled with internal polarization in recent years. That message appears to be resonating. The poll shows no major partisan divide among Catholics themselves, with many expressing hope that Leo can move past the tensions of Pope Francis’ tenure.

He’s already begun to send signals about his priorities. Recently, he spoke out against rising nationalist movements, calling instead for “reconciliation and dialogue.” It’s a message that echoes his pledge to position the Church as a global symbol of peace.

As Cardinal Robert Prevost, Pope Leo was instrumental in one of Pope Francis’ major reforms: appointing women to the Vatican board that vets bishop nominations. While he’s maintained traditional teachings that women cannot be ordained as priests, his support for women in leadership roles is seen by many as a step forward.

“I expect he’ll continue promoting women in governance roles,” said Donald Hallstone, a 72-year-old Catholic from Oregon. “Women were not excluded in the first centuries. It’d be great to see them in those roles again.”

Diverse Hopes — and Some Contradictions

While some Catholics hope Pope Leo will push the Church in a more modern direction, others are hoping for a return to stricter doctrine — particularly on issues like same-sex marriage and abortion.

Becude, the Republican from Florida, for example, supports Pope Leo’s stance on marriage being between a man and a woman. But she diverges from Church teaching when it comes to abortion.

“I don’t believe that they should stop women from having abortions,” she said. “We should have our own rights, because you don’t know the circumstances behind the reason why a woman would want one in the first place.”

The mixed expectations underscore the balancing act Pope Leo faces: staying true to Church doctrine while responding to a rapidly changing world and increasingly diverse flock.

Younger Americans Still Forming Opinions

Not surprisingly, many Americans outside the Catholic Church — including Protestants and the religiously unaffiliated — haven’t yet formed strong opinions about Pope Leo. Around half of born-again Protestants, mainline Protestants, and religious “nones” say they don’t know enough about him to decide.

Still, younger Americans tend to be more cautious in forming opinions. Only about 4 in 10 adults under 30 say they have a favorable view of Pope Leo — but they’re also not hostile, with just 1 in 10 expressing a negative view.

For some, like Mercedes Drink, 31, a nonreligious woman from Minnesota who grew up in the pope’s hometown of Chicago, Pope Leo represents potential for positive change.

“I like him because he brings something different,” she said. “As a young woman, I hope he can bring change … open the world’s eyes to modernizing the church, bringing more people in, having more diversity.”

A Papacy Just Beginning

For now, Americans seem open-minded — even cautiously hopeful — about the direction Pope Leo XIV might take the Catholic Church. With relatively few detractors and many still undecided, his early months offer a rare window of goodwill.

But as his agenda comes into focus, opinions are likely to evolve. Whether he leans into reform or tradition, Pope Leo’s papacy will almost certainly shape the future of American Catholicism — and its place in the modern world.

Source: AP News – What US adults think about Pope Leo XIV, according to a new AP-NORC poll

The post America’s First Pope Is Earning Praise — But Many Are Still Watching and Waiting appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

As the Southern Baptist Convention gathers this week in Dallas, leaders are preparing to vote on a slate of resolutions that push for sweeping changes in American cultural and political life—from banning pornography and limiting sports betting to overturning same-sex marriage rights and encouraging more Americans to have children.

These proposals, rooted in what the denomination calls “the biblical order of creation,” reflect the group’s long-standing views but come with fresh urgency in a political landscape increasingly receptive to conservative Christian priorities.

A Political and Cultural Manifesto

The proposed resolutions ask lawmakers to enact legislation that aligns with a conservative Christian worldview, particularly regarding sex, marriage, gender, and family. One resolution calls on lawmakers to pass laws that “reflect the truth of creation and natural law,” opposing anything that contradicts “what God has made plain through nature and Scripture.”

Other measures target the growing influence of sports gambling and the widespread availability of pornography—both of which are denounced as destructive forces that should be curbed or banned outright.

A resolution even singles out “willful childlessness” as a contributing factor to America’s declining birth rate, calling on policymakers to adopt “pro-natalist” policies that promote having children.

A Flashback to 1985—and a Glimpse of the Future

This year’s gathering happens on the 40th anniversary of one of the most pivotal moments in the convention’s history. In 1985, more than 45,000 attendees packed into the same city for a heated showdown that cemented the denomination’s hard conservative turn—a moment Southern Baptist leaders now call the “hinge convention.”

While attendance this year is expected to be significantly smaller, the ideological echoes are loud and clear. “There’s not a lot of room for compromise,” said religion scholar Nancy Ammerman, who witnessed the 1985 meeting firsthand. “There’s not a lot of room for people who don’t have the same understanding of who God is and how God operates.”

Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and a leading voice in the denomination’s conservative shift, says these resolutions are not just theological—they are moral obligations rooted in a divine order that applies “to all persons, in all times, everywhere.”

When Religion Meets Politics

The resolutions land at a time when social conservatives have increasing sway in government. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Southern Baptist, is third in line to the presidency. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has suggested revisiting the court’s landmark 2015 decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

And voices from the Catholic postliberal movement, along with evangelical conservatives, are pushing for a more activist government—one that openly legislates moral values, bans pornography, and promotes traditional family structures.

Internal Tensions: Women Pastors and Public Policy

But not all the tension is external. The denomination will also confront divisions within its own ranks, including another push to ban churches that employ women as pastors. A proposed constitutional amendment narrowly failed in 2023 and 2024 but is expected to be reintroduced.

While the Southern Baptist statement of faith limits the role of pastor to men, debate continues over whether this applies only to senior pastors or all pastoral staff. The issue flared again when a prominent South Carolina megachurch with a woman on staff was briefly retained—before it left the convention on its own.

Meanwhile, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC)—the denomination’s public policy arm—is facing calls for defunding. Critics, including the conservative Center for Baptist Leadership, argue the ERLC has lost its edge, especially after opposing the criminalization of women who seek abortions.

Still, defenders say the ERLC’s work on religious liberty and anti-abortion advocacy remains vital. “Without the ERLC, you will send the message… that the SBC has chosen to abandon the public square,” said ERLC President Brent Leatherwood in a video plea.

Race, Immigration, and the SBC’s Future

Race and immigration are also hot-button topics. A coalition of Southern Baptist ethnic leaders has criticized the denomination’s silence—or in some cases, opposition—to compassion in immigration policy, especially during the Trump-era crackdown. Black pastor Dwight McKissic described the current direction of the SBC as a move from “evangelical” to “fundamentalist,” warning that fewer Black churches will stay on board.

Declining Numbers, But a Glimmer of Hope

Despite holding onto its title as the nation’s largest Protestant denomination, the SBC continues to shrink. Membership dropped another 2% in 2024, marking the 18th consecutive year of decline, now down to 12.7 million.

There’s one bright spot, though: baptisms. Viewed as a key sign of spiritual vitality, baptisms rose to 250,643—surpassing pre-pandemic levels and temporarily reversing a long downward trend.

Source: AP News – Southern Baptists target porn, sports betting, same-sex marriage and ‘willful childlessness’

The post Inside the Southern Baptist Agenda: Morality Laws, Family Values, and Political Power appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

VATICAN CITY — In a brief yet symbolic Easter Sunday meeting, U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Pope Francis exchanged warm greetings despite their past public disagreements over U.S. immigration policy.

The two met at the Domus Santa Marta, the Vatican guesthouse where the Pope resides, as Francis continues recovering from a serious bout of pneumonia. Though he delegated Easter Mass to another cardinal due to his health, the 88-year-old pontiff still made time for a personal moment with Vance.

Francis offered Vance three large chocolate Easter eggs — one for each of his children, who weren’t present — along with a Vatican necktie and rosary beads.

“I know you have not been feeling great, but it’s good to see you in better health,” Vance told the Pope. “Thank you for seeing me.”

The vice president’s motorcade quietly entered Vatican City through a side gate while the Mass was underway in St. Peter’s Square. The meeting lasted just a few minutes, according to the Vatican, and was described as an exchange of Easter greetings.

Vance’s office later shared that the vice president expressed gratitude for the meeting and the Pope’s hospitality toward his family.

“I pray for you every day,” Vance told Francis as he departed. “God bless you.”

After leaving the Vatican, Vance rejoined his family to attend Easter Mass at St. Paul Outside the Walls, one of Rome’s four major basilicas. There, they visited the traditional tomb of the apostle Paul.

The Easter meeting comes after months of tension between Vance and Pope Francis over immigration. Vance, a Catholic convert since 2019, is a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump’s immigration policies — including plans for mass deportations.

Pope Francis, meanwhile, has long made compassion for migrants a pillar of his papacy. Just before his recent hospitalization, Francis strongly criticized the deportation agenda, arguing that such actions strip migrants of their dignity.

He even addressed U.S. bishops directly in a letter that appeared to counter Vance’s previous defense of the policy using Catholic doctrine.

Vance, for his part, has acknowledged the Pope’s disapproval but says he stands by his beliefs. Speaking at the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in Washington back in February, Vance admitted he’s still growing in the faith.

“There are things about the faith that I don’t know,” he said, calling himself a “baby Catholic.”

The day before his Easter audience with Francis, Vance met privately with two of the Vatican’s top diplomats — Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin and Archbishop Paul Gallagher, the Holy See’s foreign minister.

According to Vance’s office, the discussions touched on shared Catholic values, the condition of persecuted Christian communities around the world, and Trump’s stance on global peace efforts.

The Vatican’s summary acknowledged a broader “exchange of opinions,” including on migration and ongoing conflicts — likely referring to Ukraine and Gaza.

Though the Vatican has historically remained diplomatically neutral, it has taken a cautious approach toward the Trump administration, expressing concern over migrant policies and international aid cuts while continuing to promote peaceful conflict resolutions.

Source: AP News – Vance meets Pope Francis on Easter Sunday after tangle over migration, gets chocolate eggs for kids

The post Pope Francis and JD Vance Exchange Easter Greetings Amid Policy Disputes appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

For many Catholics, it felt as if Pope Francis might defy time itself.

He had brushed with death more than once — surviving a severe respiratory illness in his youth, enduring multiple surgeries, and weathering COVID-19. Even when doctors recently debated ending his treatment, he carried on. So when he appeared frail while addressing the faithful during his final Easter Sunday at St. Peter’s Square, few expected it would be his last public moment.

Just hours later, the pope was gone — leaving behind a Catholic Church mid-stride in one of its most ambitious transformations in modern history.

A Church in Transition

With the next conclave on the horizon, the world’s 1.3 billion Catholics now await a new leader to carry forward — or redirect — the legacy of Pope Francis. The question isn’t just who will be chosen, but what vision they’ll bring to a church increasingly at odds with itself.

Conservatives and progressives alike are uneasy. Conclaves are famously unpredictable, and even the most seasoned Vatican watchers are often caught off guard. Francis himself was a surprise — a liberal Jesuit chosen from a College of Cardinals largely shaped by conservative popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Few had even listed him as a serious contender before his 2013 election.

Yet Francis would go on to defy expectations, not by championing one faction over another, but by opening a deep internal debate about the Church’s identity in the modern world.

Francis’ Bold Agenda

Throughout his papacy, Francis took on a wide range of flashpoints: the sex abuse crisis, same-sex marriage, church governance, Latin Mass restrictions, and more. But beyond the headlines, his deeper mission was to spark a soul-searching conversation within Catholicism itself.

The central question he posed: Who should guide the Church — the clergy, or the people in the pews?

For Francis, the answer was clear. He believed the laity needed greater power to shape the Church’s direction. To that end, he launched the Synod on Synodality, a global initiative focused on listening to lay Catholics and incorporating their voices into theological and pastoral decision-making.

It was a move that resonated with young Catholics — including students from Jesuit universities like Georgetown. One student recounted presenting findings from a working group directly to the pope over Zoom. Francis took notes and responded personally, reflecting his hands-on approach to shaping this vision.

Global Church, Global Tensions

Francis often walked a tightrope, balancing progressive hopes in the West with traditional expectations in the Global South.

European bishops pushed for bold action on issues like LGBTQ+ inclusion, while leaders in Africa and Asia urged restraint. Francis tried to steer a middle course, reforming with caution, never fully satisfying either camp.

But perhaps no country pushed back harder than the United States.

Here, a vocal faction of conservative bishops and far-right lay converts resisted his efforts to decentralize power and reshape church traditions. One such figure, former Texas Bishop Joseph Strickland, even accused the pope of being “diabolically oriented.” Francis removed him from his post.

He also took action against other high-profile critics: Cardinal Raymond Burke lost his Vatican privileges, and Carlo Maria Viganò — who accused Francis of covering up sexual abuse — was excommunicated.

Still, Francis often preferred dialogue over punishment. In line with his Jesuit roots, he embraced discernment, encouraging debate, disagreement, and listening — as long as it didn’t spill into open conflict.

The Church in Crisis, Not in Combat

In one of his most striking addresses, Francis warned against framing the Church in terms of battle:

“When the Church is viewed in terms of conflict — right versus left, progressive versus traditionalist — she becomes fragmented and polarized… She must never become a body in conflict… but a body in continual crisis, precisely because she is alive.”

His vision of the Church wasn’t static or dogmatic. It was dynamic, messy, and deeply human — always wrestling with itself in search of deeper truths.

A Defining Moment Ahead

The conclave to elect Francis’ successor could shape the Catholic Church for decades to come. Will his reforms endure, or be rolled back? Will a new pope continue to empower the laity, or reassert clerical authority?

The world’s Catholics — divided, hopeful, anxious — now wait to find out what the Church’s next chapter will look like.

What’s clear is that Francis leaves behind not just a legacy, but a living crisis — a Church alive and searching for its future.

Source: POLITICO – An uncertain next act for the Catholic Church

The post What’s Next for the Catholic Church After Pope Francis? appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.