The post Meta Considers Service Withdrawal in New Mexico Over Child Safety Law Dispute appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: October 4, 2025, 14:00 EDT

Efforts by Apple and Google to remove mobile applications that track U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity have sparked widespread debate over public safety, free speech, and the role of technology companies in government requests. Critics warn the decision could set a precedent for how digital platforms respond to political pressure.

Federal Pressure Leads to App Removal

Apple and Google confirmed they had removed several applications that allowed users to report and track ICE sightings. The move came shortly after U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office urged Apple to block ICEBlock, one of the most popular ICE-tracking apps available on iPhones.

Bondi argued that the app endangered law enforcement officers by publicly sharing their locations. Apple agreed, informing developer Joshua Aaron that law enforcement had provided new information showing the app violated company rules. The company said the app’s purpose—providing location data on federal agents—posed potential safety risks.

Google soon followed with similar actions on its Android platform, citing policy violations.

Developers and Advocates Push Back

Aaron, who created ICEBlock in April, criticized Apple’s decision, calling it an example of corporate compliance with political demands. He said his app functioned much like navigation tools such as Waze or Google Maps, which allow users to report police activity.

“It’s not illegal in any way, nor does it expose anyone’s private information,” Aaron said. He described the app as an early warning system designed to help immigrant communities prepare for unexpected encounters with enforcement officers.

Immigrant rights advocates also expressed concern. Kica Matos, president of the National Immigration Law Center, said these platforms had become critical resources for families living with fear of deportation. “These apps are a lifeline for communities,” she said, calling the removals “a disturbing example of tech companies capitulating to government pressure.”

Surging Popularity and Growing Concerns

Since President Donald Trump’s return to office earlier this year, downloads of ICE-tracking apps have increased significantly. Aaron claimed ICEBlock had gained more than 1 million users within months of its launch.

Other platforms, such as the Stop ICE Raids Alert Network (StopICE.Net), have also expanded. Founded by Sherman Austin in February, the network uses text alerts and online updates to track ICE activity without requiring users to download an app. Austin said more than 500,000 people now subscribe to the service.

“People want to know what’s happening in their neighborhoods,” Austin explained, noting that reports of aggressive arrests and racial profiling have fueled demand.

Law Enforcement Raises Safety Issues

Federal officials argue that these platforms could encourage violence against immigration officers. Bondi had previously warned against such tools, saying they put agents’ lives at risk.

Concerns escalated after a gunman attacked an ICE facility in Dallas earlier this year. Authorities later said the suspect had searched for ICE-tracking apps, although it remains unclear whether any were actually used in the incident.

Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin defended Apple’s decision, stating that “ICE tracking apps put the lives of the men and women of law enforcement in danger” and criticized media portrayals of the removals as political capitulation.

Broader Implications for Technology and Free Speech

Civil rights advocates say the crackdown raises larger questions about free expression and government influence over tech platforms. Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney at Harvard’s Cyberlaw Clinic, compared the situation to past cases in which governments pressured tech companies to block protest-related apps, such as during the 2019 Hong Kong demonstrations.

“This sets a worrying precedent,” Caraballo said. “When governments dictate what people can or cannot access on their phones, it moves us closer to authoritarian control.”

Austin echoed this concern, accusing federal authorities of attempting to silence platforms that expose enforcement practices. His network, StopICE.Net, recently learned the Department of Homeland Security had subpoenaed Meta for data tied to its Instagram account. The subpoena was temporarily blocked after a legal challenge.

A Tense Balance Between Safety and Civil Liberties

The removal of ICE-tracking apps highlights a deep tension between public safety concerns and civil liberties. While officials argue that such tools put law enforcement officers at risk, advocates say immigrant communities depend on them for protection and awareness.

As Apple and Google continue to navigate their roles as gatekeepers of digital information, the debate underscores the challenges technology companies face in balancing legal compliance, user rights, and public trust.

Source: AP News – Apple and Google block apps that crowdsource ICE sightings. Some warn of chilling effects

The post Apple and Google Remove ICE-Tracking Apps Amid Safety Concerns and Free Speech Debate appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

“We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way,” Trump said during a Fox News interview over the weekend. “I think I’ll need probably China approval, and I think President Xi will probably do it. It’s a group of very wealthy people.”

That cryptic tease comes as TikTok faces a looming U.S. ban if its China-based parent company, ByteDance, doesn’t divest from the platform by September 17. The company has already dodged the axe several times, thanks to multiple 75- and 90-day deadline extensions—the latest just issued earlier this month.

Why This Matters

TikTok isn’t just a fun app for dance trends and dog videos. Roughly 170 million Americans use it to get their news, build communities, and for some, make a living. A U.S. ban would ripple across the creator economy and tech sector—and be a major political move with global implications.

But any sale is tricky. ByteDance still needs the Chinese government’s approval to finalize any deal, and Beijing hasn’t signaled whether it’s on board with TikTok changing hands.

Who’s in the Running to Buy TikTok?

Several big names and high-profile groups have thrown their hats in the ring. Some were close to a deal earlier this year—until fresh U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods scuttled progress.

Here’s a breakdown of the major contenders:

1. A Private Consortium with ByteDance Keeping a Minority Stake

One of the most advanced proposals came from a group of U.S.-based venture capital firms and tech investors. Under that plan, ByteDance would retain just 20% ownership, in line with U.S. law, which also prohibits the company from influencing TikTok’s data or algorithm.

No companies were publicly named at the time, but a source told CNN that all sides—ByteDance, U.S. investors, and the Trump administration—were aligned on the deal before negotiations stalled.

2. Oracle + American Investors

Oracle, TikTok’s current U.S. cloud technology partner, has reportedly been among the top bidders, possibly teaming up with private equity firm General Atlantic and investment group Susquehanna International.

Oracle has long had a cozy relationship with Trump-era officials and previously tried to secure a controlling stake in TikTok during Trump’s first term.

None of the parties commented when reached on Monday.

3. The People’s Bid – Frank McCourt, Kevin O’Leary, Alexis Ohanian

This group brands itself as “The People’s Bid” and brings together billionaire Frank McCourt (former owner of the LA Dodgers), “Shark Tank” star Kevin O’Leary, and Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian.

Their pitch? A Made-in-America TikTok that gives users more control over their data and limits algorithmic manipulation.

“Every day without a qualified divestiture puts Americans at greater risk of manipulation and surveillance,” a Project Liberty spokesperson said.

4. MrBeast + Employer.com’s Jesse Tinsley

Yes, MrBeast, the YouTube superstar with 250+ million subscribers, is part of another group reportedly interested in buying TikTok. He’s partnered with Employer.com founder Jesse Tinsley.

Their group hasn’t shared many public details, and a representative declined to comment on Monday.

5. AI Startup Perplexity

In a bold March announcement, artificial intelligence firm Perplexity said it wanted to buy TikTok and rebuild its algorithm from scratch—without creating a monopoly.

Their reasoning? As a smaller player in tech, they claim they could offer TikTok the innovation it needs without big tech baggage.

Perplexity hasn’t commented further since that statement.

What’s Next?

While Trump promises a reveal “within two weeks,” the road to a finalized deal is far from clear. China’s position remains a wild card, and the U.S. government will still need to vet any buyer to ensure compliance with the sale-or-ban law passed last year under President Biden.

Meanwhile, millions of creators and users continue using TikTok daily—unsure whether their favorite platform will be American-owned or banned altogether come September.

Stay tuned—this saga is far from over.

Source: CNN – Trump says he has a TikTok buyer. Here are the players who have been vying to buy the app

The post Trump Says TikTok Buyer Is Ready—Here’s Who Might Own the App Next appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

No Favorites: Durov’s Children Will Inherit Equally

Durov, 40, told French magazine Le Point that he’s already written his will—and that he makes no distinction between the six children he’s raised and the many more conceived via anonymous sperm donations across the globe.

“They are all my children and will all have the same rights,” Durov said. “I don’t want them to tear each other apart after my death.”

Durov said he officially has six children from three different partners. But through a sperm clinic he set up, he claims to have fathered more than 100 children in 12 countries.

They’ll Have to Wait for the Billions

While the tech mogul’s heirs may one day inherit his empire, they won’t be touching a dime any time soon.

“I decided that my children would not have access to my fortune until a period of 30 years has elapsed, starting from today,” Durov said. “I want them to live like normal people, to build themselves up alone… not to be dependent on a bank account.”

His goal, he explained, is to raise grounded, independent individuals—not trust fund babies.

Wealth and Risk: Protecting Family and Telegram

Currently worth $13.9 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Durov said his wealth and work come with real dangers. As the founder of a messaging app known for privacy and encryption, he’s made enemies in some powerful places.

“Defending freedoms earns you many enemies, including within powerful states,” Durov said. “I want to protect my children, but also the company I created.”

He emphasized his desire to ensure Telegram remains true to its founding values, regardless of what the future brings.

Telegram’s Mission: Neutrality and Free Speech

Despite the controversies surrounding it, Durov maintains that Telegram is committed to political neutrality—even when it comes to global flashpoints like the war in Ukraine.

“Telegram is a platform where opposing ideas can clash,” he said. “Where everyone can access different points of view and freely decide what they want to believe.”

He described the platform as a space for “fair access to free and independent information.”

The Paris Arrest: A Shadow on His Legacy

The interview also addressed Durov’s August 2024 arrest in Paris, tied to allegations that Telegram was being used to facilitate drug trafficking and distribution of child sexual abuse material—claims Durov strongly denies.

While details of the case remain limited, the arrest underscores the tightrope Durov walks: balancing free speech and privacy with mounting pressures from law enforcement and governments.

A Radical Vision of Legacy

Durov’s revelations paint a portrait of a man who’s as unconventional in his personal life as he is in his business. Whether or not you agree with his choices, there’s no denying: Pavel Durov is planning for a legacy that spans continents—and generations.

Source: FOX News – Billionaire Telegram CEO reveals plans to divide wealth among more than 100 children

The post Telegram CEO Pavel Durov Plans to Share Fortune with 100+ Children appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A Trump administration official confirmed Wednesday that Amazon submitted its offer in a letter addressed to Vice President JD Vance and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, did not disclose the bid’s specifics. The New York Times first reported the development.

The urgency stems from a national security law upheld by the Supreme Court, which requires TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell the platform to an approved U.S. buyer or face an operational shutdown in the country. President Donald Trump, who has millions of TikTok followers, temporarily paused the ban on Inauguration Day but has signaled that he expects a resolution by Saturday. While he has the power to delay the ban further, he has also indicated that he prefers a deal to be finalized quickly.

Amazon has declined to comment on the bid, and TikTok has not responded to requests for a statement.

Amazon’s bid isn’t the only one on the table. Several major players have expressed interest in acquiring TikTok’s U.S. operations, including:

• Oracle: The software giant already holds a 12.5% stake in TikTok Global as part of a 2020 agreement when it became the app’s cloud technology provider.
• Blackstone: The investment firm has also been exploring a potential bid.
• Perplexity AI: The artificial intelligence startup proposed a merger with TikTok’s U.S. operations in January, emphasizing its ability to revamp the platform’s algorithm without creating a monopoly.
• Frank McCourt’s Consortium: The billionaire businessman, along with Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian as a strategic adviser, reportedly offered ByteDance $20 billion in cash for TikTok’s U.S. platform.
• Employer.com Founder Jesse Tinsley: Tinsley’s consortium is said to have put forth an offer exceeding $30 billion.
• Wyoming Businessman Reid Rasner: Rasner claims to have made the highest bid so far—approximately $47.5 billion.

The controversy surrounding TikTok isn’t just about business; it’s a matter of national security, according to U.S. officials. Both the FBI and the Federal Communications Commission have expressed concerns that ByteDance could potentially share user data—including browsing history, location tracking, and biometric identifiers—with the Chinese government.

TikTok has repeatedly denied these allegations, stating it has never shared data with Beijing and wouldn’t comply with such requests. However, U.S. officials argue that China’s national security laws could compel ByteDance to hand over user information if demanded by authorities. Despite the warnings, no concrete evidence has been publicly presented to confirm these fears.

Trump’s stance on TikTok has fluctuated over time. During his first term, he signed executive orders banning transactions with ByteDance and WeChat, citing security risks. However, since then, his view of TikTok has softened, particularly as he’s leveraged the platform’s vast reach to engage younger voters. He has acknowledged TikTok’s influence in shaping public opinion and political discourse.

With the Saturday deadline fast approaching, the next few days will be crucial in determining TikTok’s fate in the United States. Whether Amazon’s bid gains traction or another company emerges as the frontrunner remains to be seen. One thing is certain: the battle over TikTok is far from over.

Source: AP News – Amazon’s last-minute bid for TikTok comes as a US ban on the platform is set to take effect Saturday

The post Amazon Makes Surprise Bid for TikTok as US Ban Looms appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The high-stakes meeting comes amid ongoing uncertainty surrounding TikTok’s future, after a law went into effect on January 19 that requires its parent company, ByteDance, to divest ownership due to national security concerns. In a move to buy time, Trump signed an executive order that delayed enforcement of the law until April 5, pushing the deadline for TikTok’s sale or potential ban.

According to a source familiar with the situation, possible investors in the deal include tech giant Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone. The meeting is expected to include key figures such as Vice President JD Vance, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, White House National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump expressed his desire to “see TikTok remain alive,” signaling his intent to find a solution. In the past, he’s suggested that reducing tariffs against China could be part of the negotiations if the country agrees to the sale.

Trump’s relationship with TikTok has been turbulent. During his first term, he attempted to ban the app over security concerns, but legal challenges halted those plans. The Trump administration later explored a sale, though no agreement was reached. More recently, Trump has credited TikTok with helping him secure a significant portion of the youth vote in the 2020 election, where he won the young vote by 36 points—a rare feat for Republicans.

“I think a lot of it could have been TikTok,” Trump remarked, noting the platform’s role in engaging younger voters.

If no deal is struck by April 5, the law mandating TikTok’s divestiture or banning it in the U.S. will come back into effect. However, the deadline may not be set in stone. Trump has suggested that the executive order could be extended if necessary, offering a potential reprieve for the app.

In January, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a federal law requiring ByteDance to either sell TikTok or face a nationwide ban. Shortly after, TikTok was temporarily taken offline for U.S. users, but was brought back after Trump vowed to stall the ban with an executive order.

While the move has faced some scrutiny, it has not yet been legally challenged.

Though it’s unclear whether ByteDance is willing to sell TikTok, several potential buyers have stepped forward in recent months.

One group showing interest is a consortium led by billionaire Frank McCourt, which has offered ByteDance $20 billion for TikTok’s U.S. operations. This group includes Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian as a strategic adviser and plans to revamp the app with blockchain technology, offering users greater control over their online data.

Another interested party is Jesse Tinsley, the founder of Employer.com, who has assembled a group of investors—including Roblox CEO David Baszucki—to offer more than $30 billion for TikTok.

Additionally, former Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and Rumble, a conservative-friendly video platform, have expressed interest in the deal. Rumble has even signaled its willingness to join a consortium to purchase TikTok and partner with the company on the tech side.

Other potential buyers include Perplexity AI, an artificial intelligence startup, which proposed a merger with TikTok’s U.S. operations earlier this year.

As the April 5 deadline approaches, it remains to be seen whether ByteDance will agree to a sale, or whether TikTok will face a nationwide ban in the U.S. Trump’s meeting on Wednesday will be a critical moment in these ongoing negotiations, and the future of TikTok in America could hinge on the outcome.

Source: – AP News – Trump to hold a meeting on possible investors to buy TikTok with possible ban at stake

The post Trump’s Big Meeting on TikTok’s Future: Can Investors Save It? appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

On March 23, 23andMe, the pioneer in at-home genetic testing, shocked the public by filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, signaling a potential sale of the company. With 15 million customers relying on the service, many are now left wondering: What happens to my genetic data?

As privacy advocates raise alarms, and even two state attorneys general urge Americans to delete their data, 23andMe insists that its bankruptcy proceedings will not affect how it handles user information. But with the company’s future uncertain, experts believe there’s a huge incentive for corporations and researchers to get their hands on the treasure trove of genetic data 23andMe has accumulated.

Genetic data provides more than just information about your ancestry—it can reveal a lot about your health, food preferences, and even traits passed down through generations. Despite growing privacy concerns, this data holds incredible potential for industries ranging from medical research to advertising.

“Genetic data is permanent and unique,” says Katie Hasson, associate director for the Center for Genetics and Society. “It could reveal information about people who don’t even exist yet, many years from now.”

As 23andMe seeks a buyer, one thing is clear: corporations, advertisers, and medical researchers are eager to access the wealth of information embedded in these DNA profiles.

The value of genetic data goes far beyond simple ancestry reports. Take, for example, how genetics can influence food preferences. Researchers have discovered hundreds of genetic variants tied to specific tastes, such as liking or disliking certain foods. Gideon Nave, an associate professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, explains that genetic data could be more insightful than your shopping cart—especially since the items you buy may be for someone else.

“Genetic data can often tell us more about a person’s preferences than even their stated choices,” Nave says. “It’s a much deeper level of personalization for companies, especially when it comes to targeted advertising.”

Moreover, 23andMe’s health-related services offer subscribers insights into their genetic predispositions for certain diseases, like Type 2 diabetes or celiac disease. That’s where the real value lies for healthcare companies and researchers: using genetic data to better understand diseases, create personalized treatments, and improve diagnoses.

Healthcare professionals often rely on rules of thumb, tests, and symptom-checking to diagnose patients, but many conditions share similar symptoms. This is where combining genetic data with clinical information can make a difference, says Vasant Dhar, a professor of business and data science at NYU’s Stern School of Business.

“Doctors are following rules and doing tests, but a lot of diseases have similar symptoms,” Dhar explains. “Genetic data, combined with clinical information, could lead to more accurate diagnoses and better treatments.”

Healthcare research is poised to benefit greatly from genetic information, especially when it comes to developing tailored medical interventions. However, the potential for misuse also raises significant concerns.

While genetic data is highly valuable for research and healthcare, it also brings significant privacy risks. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) prohibits the use of genetic data in health insurance and employment decisions, but there are few regulations surrounding its use in other industries, like disability insurance.

Katie Hasson warns that genetic data could be exploited in ways that people aren’t even aware of. For example, genetic traits linked to health risks might be used for targeted advertising, potentially manipulating consumers based on information they don’t fully understand about themselves.

“There’s a darker side to this,” says Dhar. “With genetics, companies could know a lot more about you than you realize. That kind of personal information could be exploited in ways that aren’t fully transparent.”

23andMe’s potential sale wouldn’t be the first time a genetic testing company has been acquired. In 2020, private equity firm Blackstone acquired Ancestry.com. But there’s a key difference: genetic data doesn’t expire. Unlike traditional consumer data, genetic information can be useful for companies long into the future, even if it’s not immediately applied.

For instance, companies could use genetic data to shape future marketing strategies, develop new products, or even predict consumer behavior based on health traits.

However, as Nave points out, this also brings risks. “One of the dangers of genetic data is that it’s permanent. It doesn’t have an expiration date,” he says. “If companies ever use it for marketing, they could target consumers based on health traits they aren’t even aware of.”

As 23andMe enters this uncertain chapter, the future of its data—and its millions of users—remains in the balance. The company promises to continue selling its DNA test kits and offering subscriptions, but who will buy the company and what they will do with the data remains to be seen.

For now, the key takeaway is clear: genetic data is incredibly powerful, and it’s more than just a tool for tracing your family tree. It’s a valuable commodity with vast potential—and the companies that acquire it could hold your most personal information for years to come.

As the world of genetic data continues to evolve, privacy concerns are sure to rise. Whether consumers will have a say in how their information is used remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the sale of 23andMe’s data will open up a whole new world of possibilities—and risks.

Source: CNN – 23andMe’s DNA data is going up for sale. Here’s why companies might want it

The post 23andMe’s DNA Data Is Up for Sale: What Happens to Your Genetic Information? appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Britain’s security officials have demanded that Apple create a so-called “back door” to access the encrypted data stored on users‘ iCloud accounts worldwide, according to a report by The Washington Post on Friday. The request would allow the UK government to retrieve all content uploaded by Apple users to the cloud.

Apple’s Response and Potential Consequences

In response, Apple is reportedly considering halting its encrypted storage services in the UK, rather than compromising its security promises to users, the report suggests. The UK’s Home Secretary’s office issued a “technical capability notice” to Apple, officially ordering the company to comply with the request.

Government and Apple Reactions

Apple did not provide a comment outside of regular business hours when approached by Reuters. Additionally, the UK’s interior ministry has yet to respond to the Washington Post’s report.

Background on the Investigation

This move follows Britain’s earlier actions in January, when the government used its regulatory powers to launch an investigation into Apple and Google. The probe focuses on smartphone operating systems, app stores, and browsers, raising concerns about the influence of major tech companies in the UK market.

Source

The post UK Demands Apple Open Encrypted iCloud Accounts, Report Says appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

President-elect Donald Trump announced he will “most likely” grant TikTok a 90-day extension to comply with U.S. law requiring the social media platform to be sold by its China-based parent company or face a shutdown.

Trump’s Statement

In a phone interview with NBC News on Saturday, Trump said, “The 90-day extension is something that will be most likely done because it’s appropriate.” He added that if he decides to grant the extension, the announcement would likely be made on Monday, the day of his inauguration.

Deadline Looms

The current deadline set by the law requires TikTok to shut down operations in the U.S. by Sunday unless it complies. A 90-day extension would give TikTok additional time to meet the legal requirements and avoid going offline.

Supreme Court Decision

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law on Friday, solidifying the legal grounds for the shutdown if compliance is not achieved. Despite this, the Biden administration has stated it would not enforce a shutdown in the days leading up to Trump’s inauguration.

TikTok’s Response

TikTok has indicated that without the extension, it would have to “go dark” this weekend. The company has been exploring potential buyers and solutions to address U.S. security concerns related to its Chinese ownership.

What’s Next?

All eyes are on Monday for Trump’s potential announcement. A decision to extend the deadline would provide TikTok with additional time to restructure and ensure continued operation in the U.S. market.

Source

The post Trump Suggests TikTok May Get 90-Day Extension to Avoid U.S. Shutdown appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

On Friday, TikTok warned that it will shut down access to the app for over 170 million Americans starting Sunday, unless President Joe Biden’s administration intervenes urgently to ensure the company will not face penalties under the looming ban.

In April, a bipartisan law was signed by Biden, which mandates TikTok to sell its operations to American buyers by Sunday or face a complete ban in the U.S. The Supreme Court upheld the controversial law earlier Friday, allowing the ban to take effect.

The Biden administration has signaled that enforcement of the law will be left to President-elect Donald Trump, who is set to take office on Monday. A White House official stated that the administration has made its position clear, though it left open the possibility of further actions before the deadline.

Despite this, TikTok insisted that the Biden administration’s statements were insufficient, failing to provide clear assurances to service providers who risk heavy fines for allowing access to TikTok post-ban.

“The statements issued today by both the Biden White House and the Department of Justice have failed to provide the necessary clarity to service providers,” TikTok said. “Unless the Biden Administration provides a definitive statement assuring non-enforcement, TikTok will be forced to go dark on January 19.”

While Trump has not directly committed to enforcing the ban, he had asked the Supreme Court to delay its implementation until his administration could negotiate a sale of TikTok’s U.S. operations. The Supreme Court rejected his appeal, but the app could potentially return if Trump offers reassurances against penalties for violating the law.

Service providers, fearing significant financial penalties, told TikTok that they still lack the clarity needed to continue hosting the app after Sunday.

Biden’s Role and Transition to Trump

The Biden administration’s power will officially end on Monday, with White House aides confirming that enforcement of the law will now fall to Trump’s incoming team.

TikTok executives are acting cautiously, aiming to avoid legal and financial repercussions while maximizing efforts to keep the app available in the U.S.

Supreme Court’s Ruling and National Security Concerns

The Supreme Court’s decision to allow the ban to proceed focused on concerns related to TikTok’s data collection practices and its potential ties to China. The Court noted that the app’s data collection raised national security concerns, emphasizing that foreign adversaries, like China, should not be allowed to monitor Americans’ personal information.

Although the ruling acknowledged TikTok’s role as an important platform for millions of Americans, the Court maintained that Congress’s national security concerns justified the ban.

TikTok’s Response and Future Outlook

In a TikTok video following the decision, CEO Shou Chew reiterated the company’s commitment to protecting free speech and ensuring the platform’s continued availability in the U.S., potentially with Trump’s support.

“We are fighting to protect the rights of the 170 million Americans who use our platform,” Chew said. “We are grateful for President Trump’s commitment to find a solution.”

Chew also thanked Trump for his understanding of the platform, which he has used personally to engage with the public.

Trump Weighs In

Trump spoke to CNN after the Court’s ruling, asserting that he would make the final decision on the matter. He confirmed discussions with Chinese President Xi Jinping regarding TikTok, stating that they had a “great talk.”

The Biden administration’s position, according to White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, has been clear: TikTok should remain available under American ownership to address national security concerns. However, due to the timing of the transition, the new administration will handle the next steps.

Potential Impact of the Ban

The law imposes heavy fines on companies that distribute or update TikTok once the ban is in place, with penalties up to $5,000 per user, which could total billions. TikTok is now seeking assurances that the law will not be enforced immediately, allowing the new administration time to assess the situation.

Legal and Financial Uncertainty

A U.S. law enforcement official stated that the Biden administration is leaving it to companies to interpret compliance with the law until the new administration takes office. TikTok is hoping for a period of grace while the new administration assesses the future of the app.

Chew assured users, “We will do everything in our power to keep TikTok available,” while hinting at ongoing efforts to resolve the situation.

Future Developments and Trump’s Influence

Trump’s upcoming inauguration might signal a shift in TikTok’s fate, with some in Congress suggesting that more time should be given to allow a sale of the app to an American company. The law permits a 90-day extension if significant progress is made toward a deal.

The Supreme Court ruling emphasizes national security concerns related to TikTok’s data collection, but the future of the app remains uncertain. Both TikTok and its users are in a state of suspense, waiting to see how the next administration will handle the ban and its implications for American consumers and businesses.

Conclusion

With the clock ticking, TikTok’s fate hangs in the balance. As the company braces for the potential shutdown, all eyes are on President-elect Trump, who will ultimately decide the future of the app in the U.S., and how the new administration will navigate the complex issue of national security and international business relationships.

Source

The post TikTok Threatens to Shut Down in U.S. Without Immediate Action from Biden appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.