Roblox, one of the world’s largest online gaming platforms, is rolling out mandatory age verification to prevent children from chatting with adults. The platform aims to enhance safety, comply with global regulations, and provide age-appropriate online experiences for millions of users under 18.

New Safety Measures Across Regions

Starting in December, Roblox will introduce compulsory age checks for accounts that use chat features in Australia, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. The measures will expand worldwide in January 2026.

The platform has faced ongoing criticism and legal action over children accessing inappropriate content and interacting with adults. Several U.S. states, including Texas, Kentucky, and Louisiana, have filed lawsuits citing child safety concerns.

Roblox CEO Dave Baszucki told the BBC that parents concerned about online risks should carefully monitor their children’s activity on the platform.

Industry and Regulatory Context

These changes arrive as governments increase oversight of digital platforms. Australia is considering a ban on social media for under-16s, which may extend to gaming platforms such as Roblox. Meanwhile, the UK’s Online Safety Act imposes strict obligations on tech firms to protect children online.

Anna Lucas, online safety supervision director at Ofcom, emphasized the importance of the new age verification system. “Platforms must now take steps to keep kids safe, and we’re ensuring they meet their responsibilities,” she said. “There’s more to do, but change is happening.”

How Age Verification Works

Roblox will become the first major gaming platform to require facial age estimation for accessing chat features. The technology, built into the Roblox app, estimates users’ ages using the device camera. Images are processed by an external provider and deleted immediately after verification, according to the company.

Users who complete the verification process are placed into age groups: under nine, 9–12, 13–15, 16–17, 18–20, and 21+. Chat interactions are restricted to users in the same age bracket unless they are added as “trusted connections,” which is limited to people known personally.

Children under 13 will remain blocked from private messages and certain chat functions without parental consent. Roblox already limits image and video sharing in chats and restricts links to external sites to prevent potential risks.

Addressing Existing Risks

Previously, Roblox users could circumvent age restrictions, raising safety concerns. In a BBC test earlier this year, a 27-year-old and a 15-year-old on separate devices were able to exchange messages. Roblox acknowledged that users sometimes move conversations to external platforms, highlighting the need for stronger safeguards.

Rani Govender, policy manager for child safety online at the NSPCC, welcomed the platform’s new measures but urged continued vigilance. “Young people are exposed to unacceptable risks on Roblox, leaving many vulnerable to harm and online abuse,” she said. “The platform must ensure these changes prevent adult perpetrators from targeting children in practice.”

Parental Control and Privacy

Parents will continue to manage their child’s account, including updating age information after verification. Roblox states that the new system will allow for more “age-appropriate experiences” across the platform and hopes the approach sets a precedent for other tech companies.

Matt Kaufman, Roblox’s chief safety officer, said the facial age estimation technology is accurate within one to two years for users aged five to 25.

Campaigns and Community Action

The platform’s changes coincide with virtual protests organized by advocacy groups ParentsTogether Action and UltraViolet. The campaign staged a first-of-its-kind demonstration within Roblox, delivering a digital petition signed by over 12,000 supporters demanding stronger child safety measures.

The groups called for sweeping reforms, warning that “Roblox must stop being a playground for predators.”

Global User Base

Roblox maintains more than 80 million daily active users in 2024, roughly 40% under the age of 13. By strengthening age verification and restricting adult contact, the platform aims to safeguard younger players while complying with international regulations and growing parental expectations.

Source: BBC – Roblox blocks children from chatting to adult strangers

The post Roblox Introduces Age Verification to Protect Children from Adult Chat Risks appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The Rise of Digital Tracking in Modern Families

On a recent road trip, a mother watched her college-aged twin sons travel down Interstate 85 toward Florida — not through a rearview mirror, but through the pulsing dots of a tracking app on her phone. She could see the route unfold in real time, from Georgia’s Coweta County to the beaches of Panama City, offering both reassurance and a reminder of how parenting has evolved in the smartphone era.

According to a 2024 Pew Research Center report, one in four parents of young adults use GPS-based apps to track their children’s locations. Many do so with consent and under the premise of safety. For some parents, like Christy Keys, whose daughter attends the University of Tennessee, tracking offers peace of mind. “We have never had to question her whereabouts,” Keys said, “and unless her location looks suspicious, we don’t.”

Others view tracking as a mutual act of care. “He wants me to know where he is,” said Kim Asher, whose son studies at George Washington University. For families living in large cities or during uncertain times, the reassurance can feel invaluable.

How the Pandemic Strengthened the Digital Connection

Experts suggest that this digital closeness intensified after the COVID-19 pandemic, which redefined how families stayed in touch. Sarah Gallagher Trombley, founder of Digital Mom Media and a former Snapchat executive, believes technology became an emotional bridge during a period of isolation.

“It’s not all bad,” Trombley told CNN. “For some young adults, having parents still looking out for them feels comforting, especially during those first disorienting months at college.”

Parents in earlier generations relied on faith and fixed routines. One mother recalled lying awake in the 1990s, waiting for car headlights to signal that her teenage child was home. Today, smartphones replace those headlights, but the emotional stakes remain the same — perhaps even amplified by instant access to information.

Peace of Mind or Parental Anxiety?

For many, location tracking brings reassurance. Parents can confirm that their children arrived safely at their destinations or are not in danger. Yet that same access can sometimes lead to unnecessary panic.

One father recounted how a tracking app showed his daughter’s phone parked in a deserted lot at 1 a.m. Alarmed, he drove across town only to find her fast asleep at her sorority house. Another parent described a similar scare when GPS data placed his son “in the middle of the highway” — a simple glitch caused by signal distortion near dorm buildings.

Such false alarms highlight the imperfect nature of digital monitoring. “Parents can end up punishing themselves by tracking their kids,” one father admitted. Despite its benefits, tracking can fuel worry rather than resolve it.

The Psychological Cost of Over-Monitoring

Parental tracking may also affect long-term trust. Gallagher Trombley and other experts caution that overreliance on digital surveillance can delay a young adult’s ability to make independent decisions. “Have we raised kids in such a way that it’s harder for them to truly be independent?” she asked. “I worry about the failure to launch.”

Technology may give parents a sense of safety, but it can also undermine self-reliance and mutual trust — two essentials of adulthood.

Establishing and Respecting Boundaries

Tracy Foster, cofounder of the nonprofit Screen Sanity, believes tracking can coexist with healthy relationships if clear boundaries are set. She compares it to learning how to drive: parents start in control, guide from the passenger seat, and eventually step out of the car.

“Ultimately, they’re driving by themselves, and you’re not even in the car,” Foster explained. “That’s how technology should work — parents need to realize they’re no longer behind the wheel.”

In one case, a 29-year-old adult finally disabled her mother’s tracking app, prompting anger and confusion. Foster said it illustrated how some parents struggle to accept their children’s independence after years of digital monitoring.

When Tracking Becomes Mutual

Interestingly, some young adults choose to keep location sharing active — not for their parents’ reassurance, but for their own peace of mind. As members of the so-called “sandwich generation,” many parents are now caring for both children and aging parents.

Jennifer Rowland from New Hampshire, for instance, found herself tracking her daughter at university and her widowed father in North Carolina. When her father’s location suddenly stopped updating, she discovered he had been hospitalized for heat exhaustion. “It brought about a whole different experience of using a GPS app,” she said.

These moments reveal how digital tracking has evolved beyond control — becoming a tool of mutual care within multigenerational families.

Letting Go in the Age of Connection

Over time, most parents realize that constant monitoring does not necessarily make their children safer. Instead, it offers a symbolic thread of connection — a reminder of presence rather than authority.

One father described receiving a “risky driving” alert that turned out to be his son joyriding on a Jet Ski. His panic quickly transformed into pride and laughter. “He must have been having the time of his life,” he said. “I wasn’t there, but I still felt close to him.”

That story captures a truth about modern parenting: even as technology reshapes family life, emotional connection remains the foundation. For many parents, learning when not to look at the app may be the final step in letting go.

Source: CNN – I can track my college sons’ movements on my phone, but should I?

The post Parents in the Digital Age: How Tracking Apps Reshape Family Boundaries appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Austin, TX — A high-profile effort to ban social media accounts for minors under 18 in Texas appears to be fading fast, with the state legislature running out of time to act before the session ends Monday.

The bill, which had already cleared the GOP-led Texas House, would have created one of the toughest restrictions in the country—barring anyone under 18 from joining platforms like TikTok, Snapchat, and Instagram. But momentum in the state Senate slowed just as lawmakers approached a critical weekend deadline.

“This bill was the best way to protect children in this state,” said Republican state Rep. Jared Patterson, who championed the legislation. Still, without a final Senate vote, the proposal is unlikely to reach Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk in time.

Abbott has not publicly taken a position on the bill, though earlier this week he signed a separate measure into law requiring app stores like Apple’s and Google’s to verify users’ ages. That law also mandates parental consent for anyone under 18 to download apps or make in-app purchases. Utah passed a similar law earlier this year, though it’s currently tied up in court.

The Bigger Picture: Growing National and Global Push

Texas’s proposal goes further than Florida’s recent ban on social media accounts for kids under 14, and echoes moves in places like Australia, where users must be at least 16. These initiatives are part of a growing bipartisan push to tackle the mental health risks and addictive nature of social media for younger users.

Critics of the platforms argue that companies design their apps to keep kids online longer, often exposing them to violent, inappropriate, or abusive content. Supporters of the Texas bill said it was a necessary step to give children a healthier digital environment.

However, the proposal faced strong opposition from tech trade groups and free speech advocates, who argue such bans are unconstitutional and overly broad.

Teen Usage Remains Sky-High Despite Risks

A December 2024 Pew Research Center report found that nearly half of American teenagers describe themselves as being online “constantly.” This, despite growing concerns from researchers and parents alike about the toll social media and smartphones take on mental health.

The American Psychological Association has been vocal in urging lawmakers and tech companies to do more. They say social media platforms are particularly harmful to young users who struggle to disengage or control their usage.

Legal Hurdles and Uncertain Future

Even if Texas had passed the bill, it likely would have faced immediate legal challenges—just like Utah’s law, which a federal judge temporarily blocked in 2024.

Meanwhile, California is taking a different approach. Starting in 2027, it will be illegal for platforms to knowingly serve addictive algorithm-driven content to minors without parental consent. And in New York, a new law allows parents to prevent platforms from pushing algorithm-generated content to their children entirely.

As more states and countries take action, the broader debate continues: How can society protect kids from the harms of social media without infringing on free speech or digital access?

For now, Texas’s bold attempt is on pause—but the conversation is far from over.

Source: AP News – Texas push to ban minors under 18 from social media fades with time running out

The post Push to Keep Kids Off Social Media Fades in Texas Legislature appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Australia has enacted a world-first law prohibiting children under 16 from accessing social media, placing significant accountability on tech companies to tighten security. The law, passed by the Senate on the final sitting day of the year, requires companies to take “reasonable steps” to enforce the ban or face fines of up to AUD 50 million (USD 32 million).

This unprecedented move is a response to the growing concerns about social media’s impact on youth. While other nations have introduced similar restrictions, Australia is the first to hold companies accountable for violations. Platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, and X are expected to fall under the ban, with the possibility of more being added.

Government and Public Reactions

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese highlighted the growing global concern over social media’s effects on young people, describing it as a platform that can amplify bullying, anxiety, scams, and online predation. “At 16, children are better equipped to recognize fakes and dangers,” Albanese told Parliament.

The bill received bipartisan support, with Liberal Sen. Maria Kovacic calling it a “pivotal moment” in checking the power of tech giants. “We’ve drawn a line in the sand,” she said.

However, the law faced strong opposition from smaller parties and independents. Greens Sen. Sarah Hanson-Young criticized the rushed process and warned that it could push vulnerable youth into isolation. “Social media should be made safer for everyone, not banned arbitrarily,” she argued.

A Rushed Legislative Process

The bill’s rapid progression has drawn criticism for insufficient consultation. Submissions to a Senate inquiry were open for only 24 hours, followed by a brief three-hour hearing. Despite receiving over 100 submissions, most contributors expressed concerns about the lack of thorough review.

The Senate committee recommended some amendments, including prohibiting the use of government-issued documents, like passports, for age verification.

Tech Companies’ Concerns

Tech companies raised objections, citing privacy risks and the challenges of enforcing the law. Snap Inc., the maker of Snapchat, suggested “device-level age verification” as the best solution. X, owned by Elon Musk, expressed concern about freedom of expression. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, advocated for waiting on results from age verification trials expected next year.

Meta also criticized the exclusion of platforms like YouTube and online gaming from the ban, arguing this undermines the law’s intent.

Public Support and Next Steps

Despite criticisms, the law enjoys strong public backing. A recent YouGov poll showed 77% of Australians support the ban.

The government will now consult stakeholders to determine a start date. Once implemented, accounts belonging to users under 16 will be deactivated. While parents and children will not face penalties for violations, companies must demonstrate robust efforts to comply.

This landmark legislation signals a turning point in how nations address the complex relationship between social media and youth, setting a precedent for others to follow.

Source

The post Australia Bans Social Media for Under-16s: What It Means for Kids and Tech Companies appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The rapid evolution of social media has transformed how young people connect, but it has also brought significant challenges, including cyberbullying and harmful online behavior. These issues are at the heart of Australia’s heated debate over proposed legislation to ban social media use for children under 16.

A Cyber Safety Expert’s Eye-Opening Experience

Kirra Pendergast, a cyber safety educator, has spent years educating teenagers about the risks of online behavior. However, a recent incident left her shocked and emotionally shaken. During a presentation at an Australian high school, a group of 12- and 13-year-old boys began shouting misogynistic slurs inspired by online influencers. Despite efforts from teachers to calm the students, the hostility escalated, culminating in an expletive-filled remark from a girl that drove Pendergast to leave the session in tears.

“This behavior is clearly driven by things they’ve seen online, and it has to change,” she said in a heartfelt video afterward.

Once an opponent of banning social media for children, Pendergast has shifted her stance. “Ban it. Just ban it,” she declared, citing her frustration with the toxic influence of social platforms on young minds.

Proposed Legislation: A Bold Move

The Australian government is pushing for a “world-leading” law that would prohibit children under 16 from accessing platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter). If passed, social media companies that fail to enforce this ban could face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($32 million).

The legislation proposes age verification measures to ensure compliance, though critics argue that such measures raise privacy concerns. The government has pledged to address these issues within the framework of the law.

A Growing Crisis: The Cost of Inaction

The urgency behind the legislation is underscored by tragic cases of young lives lost due to online bullying. Two 12-year-old girls, Charlotte O’Brien and Ella Catley-Crawford, took their own lives after being targeted on platforms like Snapchat. Their families have since become advocates for stricter age limits on social media, presenting a petition with over 124,000 signatures to raise the minimum age from 13 to 16.

Charlotte’s parents, Matthew Howard and Kelly O’Brien, described the devastating impact of online bullying. “No parent wants to go through what we’re going through,” Howard said, emphasizing the need for change.

Supporters and Critics of the Ban

Proponents of the ban argue that it could save lives and shield children from harm during formative years. Clinical psychologist Dr. Danielle Einstein supports the measure, noting that social media often replaces critical face-to-face interactions, limiting children’s ability to resolve conflicts and build meaningful relationships.

However, critics believe the legislation is a blunt tool that may drive children toward unregulated parts of the internet. A joint letter signed by more than 140 experts called the ban a rushed response that shifts responsibility away from tech companies to create safer platforms.

Amanda Third, co-director of the Young and Resilient Research Centre, opposes the ban, arguing that the current minimum age of 13 is appropriate for many children. She warns that the legislation is politically motivated, with upcoming federal elections and a media campaign by News Corp possibly influencing the push for stricter regulations.

Tech Industry Pushback

Tech companies have expressed concerns about the proposed ban. During a Senate hearing, Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, reiterated its zero-tolerance policy for bullying, urging users to report and block offenders. Instagram, owned by Meta, launched an anti-bullying campaign to promote strategies for handling online harassment. However, these efforts have been criticized as insufficient by parents and advocates.

What’s at Stake?

The debate continues to polarize parents, educators, and policymakers. While some see the ban as a necessary step to protect children, others worry about its potential downsides, including privacy concerns and enforcement challenges.

Cyber safety educator Pendergast believes that even one life saved justifies the legislation. “Why would we deny a child that protection?” she asked. “The only ones losing while we argue are the kids.”

The proposed law has sparked a national conversation about the role of social media in children’s lives, the responsibilities of tech companies, and the broader societal impacts of digital platforms. As Australia moves toward a decision, the world will be watching to see how this bold experiment unfolds.

Source

The post Should Social Media Be Banned for Under-16s? Australia’s Bold Proposal Sparks Debate appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.