A federal judge has temporarily halted President Donald Trump’s plan to offer financial incentives for federal workers to resign, throwing a wrench into the administration’s effort to downsize the government. The ruling came just hours before the application deadline for the controversial program, which was spearheaded by Trump adviser Elon Musk.

Judge Issues Emergency Block on Program

U.S. District Judge George O’Toole Jr. in Boston ruled on Thursday to pause the program’s implementation until he hears legal arguments from both sides in a court hearing scheduled for Monday afternoon.

“The deadline to apply must be extended until the court has had a chance to review the legal concerns,” the judge stated.

Labor unions and Democratic lawmakers argue that the program was not authorized by Congress, raising concerns that participants may not receive their promised payouts.

White House Defends the Plan, Calls Remote Workers “Lazy”

Despite the legal setback, the White House defended the program, claiming it had already drawn 40,000 applicants who had agreed to resign while being paid through September 30.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed criticism of the plan, taking aim at remote federal workers:

“They don’t want to come into the office. If they want to rip off the American people, then they’re welcome to take this buyout,” she said.

Federal Workers React: “It’s Demoralizing”

The program has sparked fear and frustration among government employees. Many see it as an attack on public service.

• A federal worker in Colorado said that insults from the administration have demoralized those providing essential government services.
• Another worker in the Pacific Northwest resigned despite the judge’s decision, saying she could no longer comply with the administration’s elimination of diversity initiatives.

One employee at the Department of Education expressed concern that the deal included a waiver of the right to sue if the government failed to follow through on payments.

Unions and Democrats Warn: “It’s a Scam”

Opponents argue the administration is pressuring employees to leave while hinting that layoffs or firings may follow.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) sent an email Wednesday, warning that federal agencies could soon face restructuring, downsizing, and job cuts.

“The majority of agencies are likely to be downsized through restructurings, realignments, and reductions in force,” the email read.

It also stated that remaining employees would be required to show “loyalty” and meet stricter conduct standards.

Union leaders warn federal workers not to take the offer, arguing they may never be paid.

“It’s a scam, not a buyout,” said Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees.

Trump’s Vision: A Radical Government Overhaul

The program is part of Trump’s broader effort to shrink the federal workforce, an initiative led by Elon Musk, whom Trump appointed to run the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Musk’s team has drawn comparisons between this program and his management style at Twitter, where he gave employees a “fork in the road” ultimatum—stay or leave with a severance package.

Rachel Oglesby, Chief of Staff at the Department of Education, told employees:

“It’s exactly what it looks like. This is just one of the many tools to reform the civil service.”

However, concerns remain about whether Trump has the legal authority to distribute federal funds for these buyouts.

Federal Workers Protest “Forced Resignations”

Opposition to Musk’s restructuring efforts has sparked demonstrations outside federal buildings, including a protest Tuesday at the Office of Personnel Management.

• Dante O’Hara, a government employee, warned: “If people don’t speak up, we’re all going to lose our jobs and be replaced by political loyalists.”
• Dan Smith, a Maryland resident, said: “It’s one thing to downsize the government. It’s another to obliterate it.”
• Mary-Jean Burke, a physical therapist for the Department of Veterans Affairs, fears mass resignations could severely impact veteran healthcare services.

A Plan Too Good to Be True?

Skepticism over the buyout offer grew after a DOGE social media post encouraged employees to take the deal by saying:

“Take the vacation you always wanted, or just watch movies and chill, while receiving your full government pay and benefits.”

For many, the message was a red flag, making them second-guess the legitimacy of the offer.

What’s Next?

With the court hearing set for Monday, the fate of the deferred resignation program remains uncertain. Federal workers face tough decisions as Trump’s administration continues its efforts to shake up the government workforce.

As union leaders and lawmakers warn against the plan, the big question remains: Will the government follow through on its promises—or leave workers empty-handed?

Source

The post Judge Blocks Trump’s Plan to Pay Federal Workers to Quit appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

When President-elect Donald Trump announced that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy would spearhead efforts to downsize the federal government, many public employees feared their jobs could be in jeopardy. Now, their concerns have deepened as Musk publicly names government workers, turning them into targets for online harassment.

Government Employees Under Fire

Recently, Musk reposted messages on his social platform, X, revealing the names and roles of individuals holding four relatively obscure climate-related government positions. These posts, viewed tens of millions of times, have led to an onslaught of negative attention and harassment for those named. At least one of the targeted employees has since deleted her social media accounts.

Although the information Musk shared is publicly accessible, the targeted individuals are low-profile civil servants whose roles don’t involve direct public engagement. Federal employees fear these actions could result in permanent personal and professional harm, including physical threats.

“This tactic sows fear among federal employees,” said Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents over 800,000 civilian workers. “It’s designed to intimidate and silence them.”

A Pattern of Intimidation

Musk has previously used his platform to criticize individuals, often resulting in significant personal backlash for those targeted. Mary “Missy” Cummings, a professor at George Mason University and a former senior advisor at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), experienced this firsthand. Musk criticized her publicly due to her comments on Tesla’s driver-assistance technology, leading to online harassment and even death threats. Cummings said she had to relocate temporarily due to safety concerns.

“He uses intimidation to pressure people to quit,” Cummings explained. “It’s a signal to others in government agencies: ‘You’re next.’”

The Climate-Related Jobs in Musk’s Crosshairs

Among those targeted were employees in climate-related roles at various government agencies:

• US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC): Musk reposted a message criticizing the role of a “Director of Climate Diversification,” calling such positions “fake jobs.” The DFC focuses on funding projects in low-income countries to address climate challenges. After Musk’s post, the targeted employee deactivated her social media accounts.
• Department of Energy (DOE): Musk called out the chief climate officer, whose role involves reducing barriers to clean energy adoption. Ironically, this office helped fund Tesla in its early days, awarding the company a $465 million loan in 2010.
• Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): A senior advisor on environmental justice and climate change faced criticism. The HHS focuses on mitigating pollution impacts on vulnerable communities, a role established during the Biden administration.
• Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): Musk mocked the salary of a climate advisor at HUD, adding laughing emojis to his post. The advisor’s work centers on addressing climate risks in housing.

Despite the backlash, the agencies involved declined to comment on individual employees or their positions.

Impact on Public Service

Federal employees say Musk’s actions discourage civil service and endanger individuals committed to public work. Some have already resigned out of fear of becoming the next target.

Experts on cyber harassment note that Musk’s tactics create a chilling effect, discouraging discussion and public accountability. However, they often hesitate to speak publicly, fearing Musk’s online influence.

Broader Debate on Bureaucracy

Ramaswamy, Musk’s collaborator in the proposed downsizing efforts, emphasized the problem is systemic, not personal. “Our opponent is the bureaucracy, not any individual,” he said, while acknowledging that most federal employees deserve respect.

Meanwhile, Musk has faced criticism for benefiting significantly from federal programs. The American Federation of Government Employees pointed out that contractors like Musk receive around $750 billion annually—far more than the $200 billion spent on the civilian federal workforce.

A Call to Action

Despite the risks, Cummings insists on speaking out. “Someone has to stand up to this,” she said. “I refuse to let him win on this point.”

As Musk continues to wield his platform against government employees, the line between public accountability and personal harassment grows ever blurrier, leaving federal workers to navigate an increasingly hostile environment.

Source

CNN Full Video

The post Elon Musk’s Posts Put Federal Workers in the Spotlight, Sparking Fear appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.