The Crown Estate said Andrew also paid £1.8 million in repair and restoration costs as the lease was handed back. The two sums are separate payments, and the available information does not establish a complete net financial outcome from the arrangement.

Andrew left the 30-room residence in Windsor Great Park in February 2026 and moved to accommodation on King Charles III’s Sandringham estate in Norfolk.

The Crown Estate said it would now focus on the property’s future use and seek opportunities to generate additional financial value for the nation.

Why the lease entitled him to compensation

The payment was linked to an early-surrender clause in the lease, rather than described by the Crown Estate as a discretionary grant.

Andrew requested early surrender of the lease on October 30, 2025. Under the agreement, the compensation depended on the notice period and the terms governing the return of the property.

The National Audit Office estimated in June that Andrew could be entitled to £301,967.66, provided the full 12-month notice period was served and subject to the assessment of repair and dilapidation costs. The amount confirmed by the Crown Estate on October 9 was £302,000.

The close match between the estimate and final payment is consistent with the contractual provision identified by the audit office. However, the payment alone does not establish how every repair cost or other financial obligation was calculated.

The separate £1.8 million repair bill

The Crown Estate said Andrew paid £1.8 million for repairs and restoration. That amount should not be confused with the compensation he received for surrendering the lease.

The National Audit Office had previously said the final compensation depended partly on dilapidation costs at handover. Its June report set out the potential compensation before those costs had been assessed.

The publicly reported figures therefore identify two distinct transactions: a contractual payment to Andrew and a payment by him for repair and restoration work. Without a full final accounting of the lease, including relevant prior payments and obligations, it would be premature to present their difference as the complete financial cost or benefit to the public.

Public scrutiny of Royal Lodge

The lease attracted scrutiny because Royal Lodge is managed by the Crown Estate, an independent commercial organisation that manages land and property on behalf of the nation. Its net profits are returned to HM Treasury.

A National Audit Office investigation examined residential arrangements between the Crown Estate and members of the Royal Family. It found that lease terms varied according to factors including upfront payments, refurbishment responsibilities, subletting rights and early-surrender provisions.

The report also noted that three cottages on the Royal Lodge estate had been sublet, with the resulting income payable to Andrew. The cottages had been vacant since April 2026, according to the audit office.

The Public Accounts Committee opened an inquiry into the Crown Estate’s property arrangements after seeking further information about Royal Lodge. Its scrutiny focused on how the arrangements were structured and whether the Crown Estate fulfilled its responsibilities in managing its assets.

The National Audit Office’s report was a factual review and did not itself make a value-for-money determination. The existence of the inquiry does not establish that the lease or compensation payment was improper.

What happens to Royal Lodge now

The Crown Estate said it would market Royal Lodge for a future use intended to generate additional financial value for the nation. That process will determine how the property is used after Andrew’s departure.

The financial implications will depend on the eventual arrangement, including any refurbishment or other costs, the terms under which the property is used and the income it generates.

The confirmed compensation settles one element of the lease surrender. It does not, by itself, resolve broader questions raised about the original lease terms, the financial benefits of subletting or the future value of the property.

The central accountability question is how the contractual payment, repair obligations and future use of Royal Lodge fit into the Crown Estate’s duty to manage its assets in the nation’s interest.

Reporting Credit: The Crown Estate; UK National Audit Office; UK Parliament Public Accounts Committee.

The post Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Receives £302,000 After Surrendering Royal Lodge Lease appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Spencer alleges in Swan Song: Diana, My Sister that then-Prince Charles told him, during an argument over Diana’s funeral arrangements in 1997, “we’ll forget her soon enough.”

He also describes Charles as sounding “giddily elated” during a conversation on the night Diana died in a Paris car crash. Those accounts are Spencer’s recollections nearly three decades after the events. They have not been independently established.

Buckingham Palace responded after excerpts from the memoir were published, saying it normally does not comment on books but noting that the king is mindful that grief can affect judgment and memory many years after a loss. The statement did not provide a detailed account of Charles’s version of the conversations.

Dispute over Diana’s funeral

The disputed conversation concerned plans for Diana’s funeral procession following her death on Aug. 31, 1997.

Spencer writes that he objected to Princes William and Harry, then 15 and 12, walking behind their mother’s coffin. He believed Diana would not have wanted her young sons to take part in the public procession.

According to Spencer’s account, he subsequently received a telephone call from Charles, who insisted that the boys should participate. Spencer says the disagreement became heated before Charles allegedly made the remark about Diana being forgotten.

William later described the decision to participate in the procession as a collective family decision. Both William and Harry ultimately walked behind their mother’s coffin alongside Charles, Spencer and Prince Philip during the procession to Westminster Abbey.

The historical record therefore establishes that the princes participated in the procession. The private conversation and the precise words Spencer attributes to Charles remain disputed.

Spencer stands by his account

Spencer has rejected suggestions that his recollection is unreliable.

In a BBC interview broadcast Friday, he said he remembered the conversation clearly and maintained that the words attributed to Charles were exactly what was said. He also said he had told friends and family about the exchange at the time because he considered it shocking.

Spencer’s position is that the memoir records his personal memories of Diana and the aftermath of her death. The publisher describes the book as his first extended account of his sister and says it was written ahead of the 30th anniversary of Diana’s death in 2027.

The palace has not publicly provided a detailed alternative reconstruction of the alleged conversation.

That leaves the central exchange as a disputed recollection: Spencer says Charles made the remark, while the palace has challenged the reliability of the memories surrounding the claim rather than publishing a detailed account of what was said.

A memoir arriving nearly 30 years later

Swan Song: Diana, My Sister is scheduled for worldwide publication on Sept. 22, 2026. Penguin Random House says the book examines Diana’s life from her brother’s perspective and covers the final week of her life.

Spencer, who delivered Diana’s funeral eulogy at Westminster Abbey in September 1997, has said he wanted to put his own memories on record rather than continue seeing accounts of his sister that he believes contain inaccuracies.

The memoir also contains other recollections about the royal family’s response to Diana’s death, including Spencer’s account of discussions over her funeral and her former status as a member of the royal family. Those claims have likewise drawn attention because they concern private conversations and decisions from an event that occurred almost three decades ago.

The palace’s response is notable because Buckingham Palace generally does not comment publicly on books about members of the royal family. It also comes ahead of the 30th anniversary of Diana’s death, when renewed public interest in her life and legacy is expected.

For now, the dispute centers on competing recollections of private conversations in the aftermath of Diana’s death. Spencer says he is recording what he remembers as accurately as possible; Buckingham Palace has questioned how grief may have affected those memories.

Reporting Credit: Buckingham Palace — official response to claims concerning King Charles; Penguin Random House/Penguin Press — publication details and stated purpose of Swan Song: Diana, My Sister; Charles Spencer — first-person account and subsequent public response to the palace statement; BBC — interview in which Spencer defended his recollection.

The post Buckingham Palace Rebukes Claims About King Charles in Diana Memoir appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Sotheby’s will offer the Christina Stambolian silk dress at a live auction in New York on Dec. 9. The auction house estimates it will sell for between $150,000 and $300,000.

The dress was worn by Diana on June 29, 1994, when she attended a fundraising event at London’s Serpentine Gallery. That same evening, a television interview was broadcast in which her then-estranged husband, Prince Charles, acknowledged that he had been unfaithful during their marriage.

The dress subsequently became known in the media as the “Revenge Dress,” a name that has remained attached to it for more than three decades.

A dress that became part of Diana’s public image

The black silk design was created by Greek-born designer Christina Stambolian.

It features an off-the-shoulder neckline, a fitted bodice, an asymmetrical hemline and a short train. Diana paired it with a pearl-and-sapphire choker, black heels and a small clutch.

She had owned the dress for several years before wearing it publicly. According to accounts surrounding the garment, Diana had initially considered it too daring for a royal appearance but selected it for the Serpentine event after changing her planned outfit.

The appearance quickly became one of the most recognizable images of Diana’s post-separation years.

Its significance extended beyond the garment itself. Diana had separated from Charles in 1992, and the public attention surrounding the royal marriage had made her clothing a frequent subject of international coverage.

The Stambolian dress became associated with a period in which Diana increasingly used fashion to present a more independent public image.

Diana sold the dress for charity

Diana did not keep the dress for the remainder of her life.

In June 1997, two months before her death, she included it in a charity auction of 79 dresses held in New York. The sale raised more than $3 million for cancer and AIDS charities.

The Stambolian dress was purchased by Briege and Graeme Mackenzie for about £40,000.

The couple subsequently used the dress to raise money for charitable causes in Scotland. After Graeme Mackenzie died, Briege decided it was time to part with the garment.

In a statement released through Sotheby’s, she said she hoped its next owner would enjoy it as much as she and her late husband had.

The coming sale will therefore be the dress’s first return to the auction market since Diana sold it in 1997.

Sotheby’s expects strong collector interest

Sotheby’s has placed a presale estimate of $150,000 to $300,000 on the dress.

The auction house will exhibit it internationally before the New York sale. Following its London presentation, the dress is scheduled to travel to Hong Kong and Geneva before reaching New York for the December auction.

The estimate is below the price achieved by another famous Diana dress in 2023.

A black-and-blue evening gown Diana wore to a 1985 dinner sold for about $1.14 million, establishing a record for a dress worn by the princess at auction at the time.

That earlier result does not establish what the Stambolian dress will ultimately fetch. Auction prices depend on bidder interest, provenance, condition and the significance collectors attach to an individual garment.

The dress became a symbol beyond fashion

The “Revenge Dress” label was not created by Diana or Stambolian. It emerged from media coverage of the 1994 appearance and became the shorthand used to describe the image.

Its enduring reputation has since expanded into fashion and popular culture.

The dress is frequently cited as an example of how clothing can communicate identity and public confidence without an accompanying statement. Diana’s decision to appear in the striking black design on a night when international attention was focused on her marriage gave the garment an unusually strong connection to a specific historical moment.

The association has also influenced later fashion references. Stambolian produced a replica of the original, while a recreation of Diana’s look was used for Elizabeth Debicki’s portrayal of the princess in the television series “The Crown.”

The original, however, has remained in private ownership since 1997.

A new audience nearly 32 years later

Diana died in a Paris car crash in August 1997 at age 36, only weeks after the charity auction that included the Stambolian dress.

The garment has therefore spent almost all of the past three decades away from public display.

Its appearance at Sotheby’s in London on Sept. 18 marks the first time in nearly 30 years that the original dress has been publicly exhibited ahead of a sale.

The upcoming auction is consequently selling more than a piece of designer clothing. The garment carries a documented connection to one of the most closely photographed moments of Diana’s public life, as well as its own history of charitable fundraising and private ownership.

Whether its final price approaches Sotheby’s upper estimate will be determined when bidding takes place in New York on Dec. 9.

Reporting Credit: Sotheby’s — auction details, provenance, exhibition schedule and presale estimate; Diana, Princess of Wales — 1997 charity auction history and original ownership; Christina Stambolian — original dress design.

The post Princess Diana’s Famous ‘Revenge Dress’ Returns for Auction After Nearly 30 Years appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published Time: 09-06-2025, 09:00 EDT

The Duchess of Kent, celebrated for her lifelong dedication to music, charitable work, and empathy on the tennis courts of Wimbledon, has died at the age of 92, Buckingham Palace confirmed Friday. Known for her warm personality and unconventional approach to royal duties, she left a lasting impact on both the public and charitable sectors.

Early Life and Royal Background

Born Katharine Lucy Mary Worsley on February 22, 1933, she was the only daughter of Col. Sir William Worsley, a baronet, and Lady Worsley of Hovingham Hall, near York. Her upbringing in a prominent aristocratic family instilled in her a sense of duty balanced with compassion, traits she would carry throughout her life.

In 1961, she married Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, a cousin of the late Queen Elizabeth II, in a grand royal ceremony. The couple had three children: George, Earl of St. Andrews, Lady Helen Windsor, and Lord Nicholas Windsor.

A Passion for Music and Teaching

Beyond her royal obligations, the duchess had a deep devotion to music. She was an accomplished pianist, organist, and singer, and notably stepped back from royal life to teach music at a public school in northeast England for over a decade.

In addition, she founded the charity Future Talent, which aimed to provide young musicians with instruments and resources to pursue their passions. Her commitment to music education was both personal and hands-on, reflecting a genuine desire to nurture talent regardless of social background.

“She brought compassion, dignity and a human touch to everything she did,” said Prime Minister Keir Starmer, praising her years of anonymous work as a music teacher.

Wimbledon Tradition and Public Warmth

The Duchess of Kent became a familiar figure at Wimbledon, presenting trophies and offering comfort to runners-up in moments of disappointment. Her most famous gesture came in 1993, when she embraced Czech tennis player Jana Novotna after her loss to Steffi Graf. This act, seen as a rare break from royal protocol, endeared her to the public and showcased her empathetic nature.

Her approachable manner and ability to connect with people made her a beloved presence at sporting and public events, bridging the gap between royalty and the general public.

Charitable Work and Personal Convictions

Beyond music and sports, the duchess dedicated herself to volunteering and charitable causes, including the suicide-prevention group Samaritans. She also made history by converting to Catholicism, the first royal to do so in over three centuries, demonstrating a willingness to embrace personal convictions even within the constraints of royal expectations.

King Charles III and members of the royal family issued a statement reflecting on her life:

“We mourn the loss of the Duchess of Kent and fondly remember her lifelong devotion to all the organizations with which she was associated, her passion for music, and her empathy for young people.”

To honor her, the flag at Buckingham Palace was lowered to half-staff at noon.

Legacy and Family

The Duchess of Kent’s legacy extends beyond her royal duties. She is remembered for her humanity, generosity, and dedication to nurturing young talent, particularly through her charity work and music education initiatives.

Her surviving family includes Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, and their three children. She leaves behind a legacy of public service and a model of compassion that bridged the worlds of royalty, charity, and everyday life.

Remembering a Compassionate Royal

The Duchess of Kent’s life exemplified a balance between royal responsibility and personal passion. Whether consoling a Wimbledon athlete, teaching music in a public school, or volunteering for charitable causes, she consistently demonstrated empathy, humility, and dedication. Her passing marks the end of an era for a royal figure who connected with people on a deeply human level.

Source: AP News – Duchess of Kent, known for devotion to music and consoling Wimbledon losers, dies at 92

The post Duchess of Kent Dies at 92: Beloved Royal Known for Music and Wimbledon Support appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.