A draft executive order obtained by The Associated Press shows President Donald Trump may push to prevent states from enacting artificial intelligence (AI) regulations. The proposal, supported by some Republicans, aims to unify oversight at the federal level but faces criticism from both parties and civil liberties groups concerned about corporate accountability and consumer protections.

Current State-Level AI Regulations

Four states—Colorado, California, Utah, and Texas—have passed laws addressing aspects of AI in the private sector, according to the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

These measures focus on limiting the collection of personal data and increasing transparency for AI systems used in hiring, lending, housing, and healthcare. Research indicates AI can make biased decisions, sometimes favoring certain genders or races.

Calli Schroeder, director of the AI & Human Rights Program at public interest group EPIC, explained, “With a human, I can ask, ‘How did you reach that conclusion?’ With AI, that transparency is often unavailable, even to its programmers.”

Beyond general rules, states have regulated AI applications in elections, nonconsensual content creation, and government operations. Some proposals also require private companies to assess and mitigate potential discriminatory impacts of AI.

Trump and Republican Objectives

The draft executive order reportedly directs federal agencies to identify state AI regulations deemed burdensome and encourages states to halt them. Methods could include withholding federal funding or legally challenging state laws.

The order also aims to develop a lighter, nationwide regulatory framework that would supersede state-level rules. Trump and supporters argue that inconsistent state regulations create barriers for AI companies and risk allowing China to gain an edge in AI development. The president has also criticized state rules as producing what he terms “Woke AI.”

A senior Trump administration official noted that the draft order is not final and could change before signing, with reports suggesting a possible announcement as early as Friday.

Separately, House Republican leadership is exploring legislation to temporarily block states from regulating AI. Details remain unclear, including which state laws such a proposal would override.

TechNet, a tech industry advocacy group representing companies like Google and Amazon, has argued that pausing state regulations could benefit smaller AI firms and provide time for federal lawmakers to craft a framework balancing innovation and accountability.

Challenges to Federal Preemption of State Laws

Attempts to prevent states from regulating AI at the federal level have faced internal Republican opposition. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis stated a federal ban would be “Not acceptable,” warning it would favor Big Tech and reduce state authority to protect against harmful applications targeting children or censor political speech online.

Cody Venzke, senior policy council at the ACLU, emphasized public concern over unsafe AI. “The American people do not want AI to be discriminatory, unsafe, or hallucinatory,” he said. “Winning the AI race cannot come at the cost of trustworthy systems.”

Federal preemption proposals have historically struggled because they clash with states’ rights to protect residents and maintain consumer safeguards, a tension central to ongoing debates over technology regulation in the U.S.

The Broader Context of AI Regulation

State regulations represent a patchwork approach, reflecting local priorities and concerns over privacy, safety, and fairness. AI increasingly influences daily life, from employment decisions to healthcare recommendations, raising questions about transparency and accountability.

The federal government has yet to establish a comprehensive AI framework, leaving states to act independently. Advocates for a unified approach argue that consistent rules could spur innovation while providing oversight, but opponents caution that overly permissive federal policies may weaken protections for citizens.

Congressional debates and executive actions highlight the complexity of balancing technological progress, national competitiveness, and individual rights. The discussion over AI governance is likely to continue as the technology evolves and its societal impacts become more pronounced.

What Comes Next

The draft executive order and possible congressional measures signal heightened attention to AI governance in the U.S. While proponents frame these actions as necessary to maintain global competitiveness, critics argue that limiting state-level oversight could favor large tech corporations and reduce transparency.

As policymakers, civil rights organizations, and tech industry representatives weigh in, the outcome could set a precedent for how AI is regulated nationwide. The ongoing debate underscores the challenge of creating policies that protect users without stifling innovation.

Source: AP News – What to know about Trump’s draft proposal to curtail state AI regulations

The post Trump’s Draft Proposal Seeks to Limit State AI Regulations appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

PARIS – June 20, 2025 — In a bold move to restore transparency in music streaming, Deezer has officially become the first platform to tag albums containing AI-generated songs, giving listeners a clear heads-up when music is made entirely by artificial intelligence.

The feature — live as of today — comes in response to what Deezer says is a sharp rise in AI-generated uploads. According to the company, nearly one in five songs (18%) uploaded daily are now fully created by AI tools like Suno and Udio — amounting to over 20,000 tracks per day.

“We’ve seen a major uptick in AI-generated music lately, and it’s not slowing down,” said Alexis Lanternier, Deezer CEO. “We’re committed to leading the industry in giving fans full transparency. It’s not about being for or against AI — it’s about being honest and protecting human creativity.”

AI Music: A Tool for Some, a Problem for Many

While AI music currently accounts for only 0.5% of total streams on the platform, Deezer says the real concern is fraud. Internal data shows that up to 70% of all AI-generated song streams come from bots, not real listeners. These fraudulent streams are often used to manipulate royalty payments.

To combat this, Deezer is excluding AI-only songs from both algorithmic and editorial playlists, and removing them from royalty calculations if there’s evidence of manipulation.

“We’re Fighting AI with AI”

Deezer isn’t just tagging these songs manually. Behind the scenes, the company has developed a powerful AI music detection system — so advanced that it can spot synthetic content created by popular generators like Suno and Udio, even without specific training data.

This cutting-edge tech is now the subject of two patent applications filed in late 2024, covering different techniques for identifying “unique signatures” in synthetic audio.

Deezer says the system can also be adapted to detect content from other AI tools, as long as it has access to a few examples.

Industry Risks: €4 Billion in Royalties Could Be at Stake

Deezer’s effort comes at a time when the music industry is grappling with the rise of generative AI — and what it means for artists. A CISAC and PMP Strategy study, co-produced with help from Deezer, warns that by 2028, AI could put up to 25% of global creators’ revenue at risk — potentially costing artists €4 billion.

As AI tools grow more sophisticated and copyright rules face pressure from governments and tech firms alike, platforms like Deezer are stepping into the fight.

“This is about standing up for real artists and songwriters,” Lanternier said. “We’re not just tagging content. We’re drawing a line in the sand.”

Deezer is currently the only major music platform to sign a global statement on responsible AI training, signaling its commitment to protecting artists’ rights in the digital age.

What’s Next?

While most AI-generated songs uploaded to Deezer aren’t even streamed by users, the sheer volume is creating catalog bloat — and fraudsters are finding ways to exploit it. Deezer’s new tagging system is designed to give fans clarity and limit the impact of fake content on what’s meant to be a space for real music.

For now, the company’s message is simple: AI has its place — but it shouldn’t replace real creativity or manipulate the system.

Source: Deezer – Deezer launches world’s first AI tagging system for music streaming

The post Deezer Flags AI-Generated Music to Crack Down on Streaming Fraud appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The post Former OpenAI Researcher Dies After Accusing Company of Copyright Violations appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Introduction

The social media platform X (formerly Twitter) has introduced updated terms of service effective November 15, which include a controversial provision allowing the platform to use users’ content for training its artificial intelligence (AI) models. The decision has ignited widespread debate, with concerns ranging from data privacy to ethical issues surrounding the use of creative work.

What’s in the Updated Terms?
The revised terms grant X a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to analyze user-generated content for various purposes, explicitly including the training of machine learning and AI models. This broad scope means that everything users post—text, photos, and other media—can potentially be used to refine X’s AI tools, such as its chatbot Grok.

While using user data for AI training is not uncommon among tech companies, X’s updated terms stand out for their explicitness. Alex Fink, CEO of Otherweb, pointed out that X’s approach removes ambiguity often seen in similar agreements on other platforms.

Concerns from Creatives and Privacy Advocates
The new policy has alarmed artists and creators who fear their work could be exploited to train AI systems that might eventually replace human creativity. Many X users are also apprehensive about personal information being processed for AI purposes. Some have started removing personal photographs and sensitive content from their accounts.

Privacy concerns are further exacerbated by the lack of clarity regarding opt-out mechanisms. Previously, users could disable data sharing for AI training through privacy settings, but it is uncertain if this option remains valid under the new terms. Moreover, the language in the revised agreement no longer differentiates between public and private accounts.

Legal Implications and Jurisdiction
Another contentious update involves changes to dispute resolution. Any legal issues arising from the new terms must be filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas or state courts in Tarrant County, Texas. This stipulation places potential legal battles in a jurisdiction over 100 miles from X’s new headquarters in Austin, raising logistical challenges for users wishing to contest the terms.

Grok’s Controversies
Grok, X’s AI chatbot, has already drawn criticism for spreading misinformation about elections and generating inappropriate content. These incidents highlight the potential risks of relying on user data to improve AI tools without stringent safeguards.

A Broader Issue in the Tech Industry
X’s move aligns with a broader trend of tech companies leveraging user-generated content for AI development. Giants like Google and Microsoft have faced similar backlash over the unintended consequences of their AI initiatives, from misinformation to ethical violations.

Conclusion
While X’s new terms of service are within the scope of what is common for social media platforms, their explicit wording and wide-ranging implications have sparked significant pushback. Whether users retain any control over their data in this new framework remains to be seen, but the update underscores the growing tension between AI advancement and individual rights in the digital age.

Source

The post X’s New Terms of Service: How Your Posts Could Train AI Models appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.