She doesn’t eat. She doesn’t sleep. She never logs off.

Meet Jordan — the AI-powered “digital twin” of former British glamor model Katie Price. For a monthly fee, fans can chat, flirt, and even indulge in their “uncensored dreams” with her. She’s lifelike. She’s always available. And she’s part of a provocative new AI platform called OhChat, which some are calling OnlyFans for the AI age.

Katie Price herself is stunned:

“You couldn’t get any more human. It’s literally me,” she told CNN. “My voice. My personality. It’s me — just younger.”

But behind the novelty of AI-generated intimacy lies a growing storm of ethical questions, digital dependency, and blurred emotional boundaries.

The Platform: AI, Fame, and Fantasies on Demand

Launched in October 2024, OhChat offers something beyond traditional adult content sites: AI avatars of celebrities and creators that deliver fully personalized, always-on interactions. Subscribers can chat with these digital personalities, receive voice notes and images, and simulate intimacy — all without the human behind the avatar lifting a finger.

“It’s the lovechild between OnlyFans and OpenAI,” said OhChat CEO Nic Young.

Creators like Katie Price and Baywatch star Carmen Electra have already signed on. The platform boasts over 200,000 users, mostly in the U.S., and some avatars are reportedly earning thousands of dollars per month.

OhChat offers a tiered subscription model:

• $4.99/month for unlimited text chats
• $9.99 for access to voice notes and images
• $29.99 for VIP interaction with no limits

And creators keep 80% of the revenue their avatars generate. For many, it’s a new stream of passive income that runs 24/7.

“You have literally unlimited passive income without having to do anything again,” said Young.

To create an avatar, creators provide about 30 images and 30 minutes of voice interaction. Using Meta’s large language model, the AI is built “within hours” to mimic voice, appearance, and personality.

Price’s avatar, Jordan, is currently rated “Level 2” on the platform’s internal scale — meaning users can expect sexualized chats and topless content, but no full nudity or simulated sex. Creators choose the level of explicitness themselves.

“She doesn’t sleep. She’s always there,” Price said, adding that Jordan offers a level of connection even her OnlyFans page can’t match. “It’s scarily fascinating.”

The Ethical Gray Zone: Where Emotions and AI Collide

As AI avatars like Jordan rise in popularity, experts warn that the implications go far deeper than sexy chats and celebrity replicas.

“This creates exactly the right environment for the human to be left behind — while still being exploited,” said Eleanor Drage, an AI ethics researcher at Cambridge University.

Concerns range from emotional manipulation and parasocial relationships to reputational risks for public figures and users alike. AI relationships — even clearly artificial ones — can evoke very real emotions.

Sandra Wachter, a professor of technology and regulation at Oxford, questioned the societal cost:

“Is it socially beneficial to incentivize and monetize human-computer interaction masquerading as emotional discourse?”

Real-world examples add weight to those concerns. In 2023, a mother sued AI company Character.AI after her teenage son died by suicide following an intense bond with one of its chatbots. On social media, people routinely post about falling for ChatGPT “boyfriends” or AI-generated companions.

“It’s all algorithmic theatre,” said AI expert Toby Walsh. “An illusion of a reciprocal relationship where none actually exists.”

Still, OhChat insists it’s transparent. Young claims users are made aware they’re interacting with AI from the start, even if the illusion is immersive by design.

“We strike a balance between immersion and transparency,” Young said. “We’re very clear about what we are offering.”

But Walsh is skeptical. Platforms like OhChat are engineered for engagement, he said — and that means maximizing user attention and spending.

Reputation, Consent, and Control

There are risks for creators, too. AI avatars may say something unexpected, or even offensive — especially if the system “hallucinates,” a known issue with generative AI.

“If an avatar is hacked or says something offensive, reputational harm to the public figure is likely,” warned Éamon Chawke, a partner at IP law firm Briffa.

To mitigate that, OhChat implements strict guardrails. Each creator signs an agreement outlining what their avatar can and cannot do. Avatars can be paused or deleted at any time, and creators retain full control over their digital twin’s behavior and presence.

“It’s their call, entirely,” said Young. “They can walk away from it whenever they want.”

Despite the controversy, Young believes AI avatars are the inevitable future of digital celebrity.

“I can’t imagine a future where every creator doesn’t have a digital twin,” he said. “With absolute certainty, it will be the norm. And we want to be the platform that powers it.”

The Bottom Line

OhChat is pushing the boundaries of what intimacy looks like in the AI era — merging tech, celebrity, and fantasy into an always-on, monetized simulation of affection.

For fans, it may feel like closeness. For creators, it’s a new kind of digital labor. But for ethicists and skeptics, it’s a troubling glimpse into a world where emotional bonds are one-sided, data-driven, and for sale.

Jordan never sleeps. But maybe we should all pause and ask: At what cost does simulated connection come?

Source: CNN – ‘She never sleeps’: This platform wants to be OnlyFans for the AI era

The post She Never Sleeps: The Rise of AI Avatars in Adult Entertainment appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a groundbreaking moment for both the legal world and the role of technology in justice, Stacey Wales used artificial intelligence (AI) to have her deceased brother, Christopher Pelkey, speak at the sentencing of his killer in a road rage incident. The decision was a deeply personal one for Wales, who had spent years crafting a victim impact statement. But she realized that no matter how carefully worded her statement was, it could never truly capture her brother’s humanity and what he would’ve said himself.

Determined to give Pelkey a voice, she and her husband, both tech professionals, took a bold step: they created an AI-generated video of Pelkey, using his likeness and voice to deliver the message she had written. The video played at the sentencing hearing for Gabriel Paul Horcasitas, the man who shot Pelkey in November 2021, and in it, Pelkey expressed a message of forgiveness to his killer—something Wales knew her brother would have done, though she wasn’t yet ready to do herself.

A Moving Moment in the Courtroom

The AI version of Pelkey delivered the statement in a tone that, although slightly robotic, captured his essence. In the video, Pelkey acknowledged the tragedy of his death, saying, “It is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances. In another life, we probably could have been friends.” His voice, recreated by AI, spoke of a forgiveness that touched the courtroom.

Judge Todd Lang, moved by the video, remarked, “As angry as you are and justifiably angry as the family is, I heard the forgiveness.” Pelkey’s killer was sentenced to 10.5 years for manslaughter and an additional 2 years for endangerment.

The Use of AI in Legal Settings

This marks a significant, possibly unprecedented, use of AI in the courtroom. Legal experts are watching closely as AI begins to play an increasing role in both criminal justice and legal processes. This incident has raised critical questions about the ethical and practical implications of using technology to replicate deceased individuals. Is it an effective tool for bringing humanity into legal proceedings, or does it risk distorting the emotional weight of justice?

Paul Grimm, a Duke University law professor, commented on the potential influence of AI in legal settings, stating, “These kinds of technologies have tremendous impact to persuade and influence… we’re always going to have to balance whether or not it is distorting the record.” As AI becomes more advanced, the legal world will need to navigate the fine line between innovation and fairness in courtrooms.

The Emotional and Legal Complexities

For Wales, the decision to use AI was part of her grieving and healing process. Pelkey’s autopsy photos and footage from his death had already been shown in court, but Wales wanted the judge to see her brother as he was in life. It was a way to present his humanity beyond the tragedy of his death. She and her husband, who are both involved in tech, used AI software to create the video, training it with old photos and videos of Pelkey.

Though the defense team did not receive prior notice about the use of AI in the victim’s statement, the judge did not object. Pelkey’s defense attorney, Jason Lamm, has expressed concerns, noting that the introduction of AI may influence the judge’s sentencing, a matter that could be raised in an appeal.

Navigating AI’s Role in Legal Cases

The legal world is still adjusting to the presence of AI-generated content in courtrooms. While some judges have been open to incorporating AI in limited ways, there are growing concerns about its use. A recent incident in New York saw an appellate judge shut down a request for an AI-generated avatar to present a legal case, highlighting the challenges in ensuring transparency and accuracy in AI’s application.

Critics warn that AI could introduce biases into court proceedings, potentially portraying a party in a more sympathetic light or influencing a judge or jury’s emotions. Experts suggest that in the future, AI-generated content should be reviewed by opposing counsel before being introduced as evidence or in victim impact statements.

Wales herself acknowledged the importance of using AI responsibly. “This was not evidence; the jury never saw this. It wasn’t even made before a verdict came down,” she said, emphasizing that the video was an opinion, not part of the official trial. The AI was simply a way to allow her brother to be present in the courtroom, even though he could not physically be there.

A Healing Moment for the Family

For Wales and her family, the AI video provided a sense of closure and connection. After the hearing, her 14-year-old son told her, “Thank you so much for making that. I needed to see and hear from Uncle Chris one more time.” It was a bittersweet moment that captured the complex relationship between technology, grief, and justice.

As AI continues to evolve, its role in the courtroom will undoubtedly be a topic of ongoing debate. Whether it can become a tool for justice or a source of legal complications remains to be seen. But in this case, for Stacey Wales, the technology gave her brother a chance to speak one last time—and that, she says, was healing for her and her family.

Source: CNN – He was killed in a road rage incident. His family used AI to bring him to the courtroom to address his killer

The post Family Uses AI to Let Deceased Brother Speak at Killer’s Sentencing appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a move aimed at securing more investment and keeping pace with the rapidly evolving AI landscape, OpenAI announced on Monday that it will remain under the control of its nonprofit parent. However, the company plans to restructure its for-profit arm to help raise additional capital necessary for advancing artificial intelligence (AI) technology.

This decision comes after a whirlwind of criticism and legal challenges, including a high-profile lawsuit from Elon Musk. Musk and others have accused OpenAI of drifting from its original mission to develop AI that benefits humanity.

In a blog post, OpenAI explained that it chose to keep the nonprofit in charge after consulting with civic leaders and engaging in discussions with the Attorneys General of California and Delaware. The company emphasized that it would work closely with its major backer, Microsoft, along with regulators and newly appointed nonprofit commissioners, to finalize the new structure.

The Push for More Capital

OpenAI had initially planned in December to transform into a public benefit corporation, which would allow the organization to raise more capital and reduce restrictions imposed by its current nonprofit framework. This move raised concerns about the allocation of assets between the nonprofit and for-profit arms and the balance between making profits and serving the public good, especially as OpenAI pushes the boundaries of AI development.

On Monday, the company clarified that the nonprofit will continue to control the public benefit corporation, making it a major shareholder in the newly structured entity. Public benefit corporations offer more flexibility than traditional nonprofits, allowing them to pursue profits while still focusing on social impact.

A Compromise That Works for Investors

Bret Taylor, OpenAI’s board chairman, called the announcement a “compromise” that preserves much of the existing structure. CEO Sam Altman echoed this sentiment, describing it as a solution that satisfies investors while ensuring enough funding to continue its ambitious AI projects.

OpenAI has been facing increasing pressure to attract more investment in the race to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI) — AI that surpasses human intelligence. The startup plans to raise up to $40 billion in a funding round led by SoftBank Group, with a projected $300 billion valuation. This round, however, hinges on OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit model by the end of the year.

Raising Capital and Investor Concerns

Despite the announcement, some analysts remain skeptical about OpenAI’s ability to raise capital as efficiently with nonprofit control in place. Gil Luria, an analyst at D.A. Davidson, pointed out that “the nonprofit status significantly reduces OpenAI’s ability to raise capital,” as investors typically seek a return on investment, something harder to achieve with a nonprofit structure.

A History of Drama and Change

OpenAI’s governance structure gained attention in November 2023 after a dramatic boardroom shakeup that saw Altman ousted for a brief period over trust and communication issues. His reinstatement, after a wave of support from employees and investors, was a defining moment for the company, highlighting the challenges of balancing its nonprofit roots with the demands of rapidly expanding in a commercial market.

With this new restructuring plan, OpenAI aims to strike a delicate balance between maintaining its original mission and scaling up to meet the growing demand for advanced AI technology. Whether the move will satisfy all stakeholders, however, remains to be seen.

Source: CNN – OpenAI to remain under non-profit control in change of restructuring plans

The post OpenAI’s New Plan: Non-Profit Parent Holds the Reins as AI Race Heats Up appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

A group of Microsoft employees staged a protest during a company town hall meeting on Monday, opposing the company’s contracts to provide artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing services to the Israeli military.

Protest at Microsoft Town Hall

During the meeting at Microsoft’s corporate headquarters, CEO Satya Nadella was speaking about new products when five employees, standing nearby, revealed T-shirts that collectively spelled out the question:
“Does Our Code Kill Kids, Satya?”

The protest was live-streamed throughout the company, but Nadella continued speaking without addressing the demonstrators. Security personnel quickly approached the employees, tapped them on the shoulders, and escorted them out of the room.

Microsoft later issued a statement, saying:

“We provide many avenues for all voices to be heard. Importantly, we ask that this be done in a way that does not cause a business disruption. If that happens, we ask participants to relocate.”

Context: AI and Cloud Services Used in Israeli Military Operations

The protest follows a recent Associated Press (AP) investigation, which revealed that Microsoft and OpenAI’s advanced AI models were used in an Israeli military program to identify bombing targets in Gaza and Lebanon.

The AP report also highlighted a 2023 Israeli airstrike that mistakenly hit a civilian vehicle in Lebanon, killing three young girls and their grandmother.

Microsoft has not publicly addressed the findings of the AP report, nor has it responded to inquiries regarding possible disciplinary action against the protesting employees.

Rising Internal Tensions at Microsoft

This is not the first time Microsoft workers have protested the company’s involvement with the Israeli military.

• In October 2023, Microsoft fired two employees who helped organize an unauthorized vigil for Palestinian refugees at its headquarters. The company said their termination was in line with internal policies but did not provide further details.
• A group of employees, operating under the name “No Azure for Apartheid,” has been advocating against Microsoft’s Azure cloud services being used by the Israeli military.
• Some Microsoft employees have also expressed support for Israel, arguing that pro-Palestinian activism in the company has made them feel unsafe.

AI and Cloud Usage Increased After October 7 Attack

The AP report, based on internal company data, revealed that usage of Microsoft’s AI models by the Israeli military through Azure increased nearly 200 times following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel.

Microsoft employees have actively discussed the findings on internal forums, with many questioning whether the company is violating its stated principles on human rights and the ethical use of AI.

Calls for Accountability

Abdo Mohamed, a researcher and data scientist fired after the October vigil, criticized Microsoft’s leadership, saying the company is prioritizing profits over ethics.

“The demands are clear: Satya Nadella and Microsoft executives need to answer to their workers by dropping contracts with the Israeli military.”

What’s Next?

Microsoft has yet to respond to mounting internal and external pressure regarding its role in Israeli military operations. As tensions rise both within the company and globally, employees and advocacy groups are expected to continue pushing for corporate accountability and ethical AI use.

Source

The post Microsoft Workers Protest AI Contracts with Israeli Military appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.