NEW YORK — In a blockbuster media and political development, Paramount Global and CBS have agreed to a settlement potentially exceeding $30 million to resolve former President Donald Trump’s lawsuit accusing the network of election interference tied to a 2024 “60 Minutes” interview with then–Vice President Kamala Harris.

The deal includes an upfront $16 million payout to cover Trump’s legal expenses and contributions to causes such as his future presidential library or charities, according to Fox News Digital. CBS has not admitted wrongdoing, but agreed to reform its editorial standards as part of the settlement.

What’s Changing at CBS?

As part of the agreement, CBS will now release full, unedited transcripts of all future interviews with presidential candidates. Insiders are already calling this policy change the “Trump Rule.”

While CBS hasn’t conceded any journalistic fault, sources say the new policy aims to rebuild trust and transparency after months of backlash.

The Numbers: A Massive Payout

• $16 million paid upfront to Trump
• Additional mid–eight-figure allocation anticipated for future public service announcements and conservative-aligned messaging across CBS platforms
• The total amount may surpass the $15 million ABC paid Trump last year in a separate defamation case

Paramount executives dispute the additional allocation figure, but Trump’s legal team sees the deal as a resounding victory.

“President Trump delivers another win for the American people… CBS and Paramount Global had no choice but to settle,” a spokesperson for Trump’s team said.

The Lawsuit: What Sparked the Battle

Trump’s legal complaint centered on a 2023 “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris. A preview clip on Face the Nation showed Harris fumbling through a widely mocked answer about Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu — what critics called a “word salad.” A different, more concise version of her response aired during the network’s primetime broadcast.

Trump alleged this selective editing was meant to shield Harris from criticism right before Election Day — and that it amounted to election interference. CBS maintained that both clips came from the same answer and denied any intent to mislead.

Still, the FCC got involved, forcing CBS to release the unedited transcript, which revealed both parts of Harris’ answer were cut and aired separately.

Political and Industry Fallout

Trump originally sought $20 billion in damages. And while CBS avoided that number, the network was clearly under pressure — especially with Paramount Global’s pending merger with Skydance Media in the background. There were fears that Trump’s FCC could block the deal if the lawsuit wasn’t resolved.

Not everyone inside CBS agreed with the decision to settle:

• “60 Minutes” producers reportedly called the lawsuit “complete bulls—”
• Longtime executive producer Bill Owens resigned in April over the dispute, citing a lack of editorial independence
• CBS News President Wendy McMahon also stepped down in May, stating, “It’s time for me to move on”

Meanwhile, Sen. Bernie Sanders and eight other Democratic senators had urged Paramount not to settle, calling the lawsuit an “attack on the First Amendment.”

No Apology, No Personal Payout

The settlement does not include any admission of guilt or a formal apology. No money is going directly to Trump himself—the funds are earmarked for legal and charitable use.

Paramount emphasized that the settlement is unrelated to the Skydance deal and that it is simply “abiding by the legal process.” Still, the timing suggests a strategic move to clear the decks ahead of the July 2 shareholder meeting.

Trump: “They Cheated the American People”

Trump, for his part, called the CBS segment a “fraud on the American people.” On Truth Social, he claimed Harris’ original answer was so damaging it would have “cost her many of the votes she ended up getting.”

The case, Trump argued, showed that the media had gone too far in trying to influence elections—and this time, he fought back and won.

Final Take

This is more than just a legal victory for Trump—it’s a shot across the bow for mainstream media. Whether you view it as justice or intimidation, the settlement marks a pivotal moment in the evolving relationship between politics, press freedom, and accountability in the digital age.

Source: FOX News – Paramount, CBS forced to pay eight figures, change editorial policy in settlement with President Trump

The post Trump Scores Big Win as CBS Agrees to Eight-Figure Settlement appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Washington, D.C. — Longtime Washington Post columnist and socialite Sally Quinn is making headlines for a pointed accusation against former First Lady Jill Biden, claiming she committed what amounts to “elder abuse” by encouraging President Joe Biden to seek re-election despite his declining health.

In a candid interview on The Tara Palmeri Show, Quinn didn’t hold back. “I blame Jill Biden for this,” she said. “If she had told Joe not to run, he wouldn’t have. She supported it—and that was a disservice to the country.”

Health Concerns Raised After Cancer Diagnosis

The explosive remarks come on the heels of a troubling health update: former President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. The revelation shocked many, including Quinn, who questioned how such a condition could have gone undetected for so long given the quality of medical care available to U.S. presidents.

“It should’ve been diagnosed a long time ago,” Quinn said. “It’s hard for me to believe they didn’t know and just waited until it was too aggressive to hide.”

A spokesperson later confirmed to Fox News that Biden’s last prostate screening occurred in 2014.

‘Elder Abuse’ Accusation Stems from Debate Fallout

According to Quinn, alarm bells rang after Biden’s widely criticized performance during the June 2024 presidential debate—a moment that intensified public scrutiny of his fitness for office.

“She wasn’t protecting him,” Quinn said of Jill Biden. “I thought it was elder abuse, really.”

She said the former First Lady’s unwavering push for her husband’s campaign left many in the Washington establishment disturbed. “Everyone thought he shouldn’t run,” Quinn continued. “It was terrible for the party, and people were horrified he was allowed to.”

Insider Insight and Personal Reflection

Quinn, who was married to famed Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee during his battle with dementia, drew a personal comparison. She described Biden’s behavior—his forgetfulness and moments of confusion—as strikingly familiar.

“To me, it looks like the beginning of dementia,” she said.

She also echoed growing concerns in Washington circles that Biden’s staff and family may have knowingly overlooked signs of cognitive decline.

New Book Alleges White House Cover-Up

The controversy is further inflamed by the release of Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again, a new book by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’ Alex Thompson. The book alleges that the White House actively concealed Biden’s deteriorating condition while he was in office.

Quinn said the idea of Biden continuing to serve was widely seen as a mistake, even among political allies. “People felt sorry for him,” she said, “but it was still his egotistical decision to stay in office—and now look where we are.”

Silence from Jill Biden’s Office

As of publication, Jill Biden’s office has not responded to requests for comment.

Key Takeaways:

• Columnist Sally Quinn accuses Jill Biden of “elder abuse” for backing her husband’s 2024 run despite health concerns.
• Joe Biden’s prostate cancer diagnosis has reignited questions about his cognitive and physical fitness.
• New reporting alleges the White House covered up signs of Biden’s decline.
• Quinn’s remarks echo sentiments reportedly shared by others in the Washington political establishment.

Source: FOX News – Jill Biden accused of ‘elder abuse’ by Washington Post columnist for pushing husband to seek re-election

The post Washington Insider Says Jill Biden Pushed Husband to Run Despite Decline appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Eight years after the chaotic transition at the start of his first term, Donald Trump is moving quickly to assemble his next White House team. This time, he’s bringing back several key figures from his first administration to hit the ground running once he takes office in January 2025.

Since his election victory, Trump has swiftly nominated 21 of his 24 Cabinet-level positions and filled multiple senior White House roles. This is in stark contrast to his disorganized 2016 transition, which saw delays, the departure of his original transition chair, and a slow pace in filling vacancies.

Among those returning to the White House are familiar faces such as Stephen Miller, architect of Trump’s immigration policies; Dan Scavino, a longtime Trump adviser; and Russell Vought, who is nominated to lead the powerful Office of Management and Budget (OMB). At least 14 of Trump’s picks for senior positions were part of his first administration, with the number expected to grow.

“I think these guys want to come back and finish the job,” said Sean Spicer, Trump’s first White House press secretary. Spicer believes that the experienced team will lead to “a flurry of activity” right from the start.

In addition to his former staff, Trump is also introducing new faces, including Susie Wiles as White House chief of staff and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nominated as Secretary of Health and Human Services. Trump’s orbit also includes influential non-government figures like Elon Musk, who is advising on dismantling the federal bureaucracy.

Unlike 2016, Trump’s allies say there will be no “learning on the fly” this time around. “It usually takes months for an administration to get off the ground. They’re going to take seconds,” Spicer said, predicting that Trump will use every moment to enact change.

The return of Trump’s most loyal aides underscores the importance he places on loyalty. He has often criticized former aides, like ex-chief of staff John Kelly and press aides Sarah Matthews and Stephanie Grisham, who became critics after the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. “I picked some people that I shouldn’t have picked,” Trump admitted in a recent interview.

Among Trump’s early actions, he has already announced a series of tariffs, including 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada and 10% on goods from China. He has also reiterated his promise to begin deporting undocumented immigrants on his first day in office.

Key Figures Returning to Trump’s White House:

• Stephen Miller, Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy: A top immigration adviser during Trump’s first term, Miller will play a central role in policy and strategy. Known for his controversial immigration policies, Miller says Trump’s policy team is ready to implement his agenda from Day One.
• Russell Vought, OMB Director: Vought, nominated to lead the Office of Management and Budget, previously served in the role during Trump’s first term. He was also a key figure in drafting Project 2025, a policy blueprint focused on strengthening presidential powers over federal agencies.
• Dan Scavino, Deputy Chief of Staff: A trusted ally of Trump, Scavino will return as deputy chief of staff. He was previously Trump’s social media director and played a key role in managing Trump’s public communications.
• Steven Cheung, Director of Communications: Cheung, known for his combative style, will lead communications in the White House. He has been a consistent Trump supporter and helped manage communications during his 2024 campaign.
• William McGinley, White House Counsel: McGinley, who served as cabinet secretary during Trump’s first term, will return as White House counsel. He also played a key role in election integrity efforts during the 2024 campaign.
• Karoline Leavitt, Press Secretary: At 27, Leavitt will be the youngest-ever White House press secretary. A former press aide and campaign communications director, she will take over press briefings, which were known for their combative nature during Trump’s first term.
• Sebastian Gorka, Senior Director for Counterterrorism: A controversial figure, Gorka will return as senior director for counterterrorism. Known for his hardline stances on issues like immigration, Gorka has remained a vocal Trump supporter.
• John Ratcliffe, CIA Director: Trump has nominated Ratcliffe, a former director of national intelligence, to lead the CIA. Ratcliffe previously served as a U.S. congressman from Texas before his appointment as DNI.
• Matthew Whitaker, U.S. Ambassador to NATO: Whitaker, who briefly served as acting attorney general, will become the U.S. ambassador to NATO, playing a key role in foreign relations.
• Linda McMahon, Education Secretary: McMahon, a former wrestling executive, is nominated to lead the Department of Education. She has been a close ally of Trump since her tenure as the Small Business Administration administrator.
• Jamieson Greer, U.S. Trade Representative: Greer, a former chief of staff for the trade representative, will help implement Trump’s pledge to impose tariffs on imports.
• James Braid, Director of Legislative Affairs: A former OMB aide, Braid will return to manage relations with Congress, bringing a strong background in legislative strategy.
• Alex Latcham, Director of Public Liaison: Latcham will serve as a key link between the White House and the public, drawing from his previous work as deputy political director.
• Kevin Hassett, Director of National Economic Council: Hassett, who helped push Trump’s tax cuts through Congress, will return to lead the National Economic Council.

As Trump prepares for his second term, his team’s return emphasizes his desire to finish what he started and implement his agenda from Day One.

Source

The post Trump Brings Back Loyal Allies for a Fast-Paced Second Term appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

As the 2024 election season nears its end, Democrats are grappling with disappointing outcomes at the ballot box. Several prominent figures have come under scrutiny for their poor performances, with conservative critics calling out these political “turkeys.”

1. Chuck Schumer & Nancy Pelosi’s Struggles

Senator Chuck Schumer from New York and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi are facing backlash after their efforts in the 2024 election didn’t deliver the expected results. Schumer’s Democratic Party lost control of the U.S. Senate, with Republicans taking charge of the chamber. In response, Schumer emphasized the importance of bipartisan legislation, regardless of his party’s position.

Pelosi, who campaigned heavily for the Biden-Harris ticket, is under fire for allegedly pushing President Biden out of the race in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris. Her move did not succeed, and now she faces criticism from both fellow Democrats and media outlets. Pelosi suggested that Biden should have dropped out sooner, which some party members see as a misstep.

2. George & Alex Soros: The ‘Soros Money Machine’ Faces Setbacks

The political influence of George Soros and his son Alex Soros took a hit in 2024, especially in California, where voters rejected progressive crime reforms. Proposition 36, which rolled back parts of the controversial Proposition 47, highlighted growing frustration with the state’s soft-on-crime policies. Soros-backed district attorneys, like George Gascón in Los Angeles, suffered losses as crime became a top issue.

In addition, progressive figures supported by the Soros family saw setbacks in Oakland, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, with multiple officials being ousted or losing their positions. Critics, including legal experts, argued that these defeats were a public demand for change, away from failed progressive experiments.

3. Kamala Harris’ Struggling Presidential Campaign

Kamala Harris’ campaign for president in 2024 faced heavy criticism. Despite having a star-studded group of celebrity endorsers, including Oprah Winfrey, George Clooney, and Beyoncé, Harris failed to connect with key swing-state voters. Her campaign spent over $1 billion on high-profile events, but many voters felt her message was overshadowed by celebrity endorsements. Critics, like the Chicago Tribune, suggested that Harris would have been better served by engaging more with independent journalists and focusing on her policies.

4. Celebrity Endorsements Backfire

Some Democratic leaders have been criticized for relying on celebrity endorsements instead of focusing on voter concerns. Rep. Greg Landsman of Ohio, who won re-election in a state Trump dominated in 2020, expressed frustration over this strategy, noting that celebrity endorsements don’t sway voters the way Democrats might hope. He pointed out that voters care more about tangible policies than the opinions of famous figures.

5. Pollsters and Consultants Under Fire

Many conservatives are taking aim at pollsters and political consultants after they mispredicted the outcomes of the 2024 election. Critics pointed out that polls consistently underestimated Trump’s support, especially in swing states like Iowa, where he won by a larger margin than anticipated. Veteran pollster J. Ann Selzer faced significant backlash after her Des Moines Register poll showed Harris ahead in Iowa, only for Trump to win by more than 13 points.

Senator Marco Rubio also weighed in, advising Democrats to reconsider their approach to Hispanic voters. He argued that the community’s concerns about issues like immigration, crime, and rising costs had not been adequately addressed by Biden’s campaign.

Source

The post Top Political Blunders of 2024: Conservatives Call Out Key Figures appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently met with President-elect Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort, signaling a notable shift in their historically tense relationship.

This interaction comes as Trump maintains a close, high-profile connection with Elon Musk, owner of X (formerly Twitter). Unlike his camaraderie with Musk, Trump’s rapport with Zuckerberg has been marked by conflict, including Facebook and Instagram banning Trump following the Capitol riots and Trump’s past threats to imprison Zuckerberg if he interfered in the 2024 election.

A Turning Point in Relations

Recent developments suggest a thaw in the friction between Trump and Zuckerberg. The dinner at Trump’s Florida mansion is the most significant sign of their improving relationship.

“Mark was grateful for the invitation to join President Trump for dinner and the opportunity to meet with members of his team about the incoming administration,” a Meta spokesperson told the BBC. They added that it was an “important time for the future of American innovation.”

Past Tensions

Trump’s hostility toward Zuckerberg peaked in August when he claimed in a book that Zuckerberg could “spend the rest of his life in prison” if he meddled in the upcoming election. By October, however, Trump softened his stance, describing Zuckerberg as “nice” for avoiding involvement in the election and even thanking him for a supportive phone call after an assassination attempt on Trump.

Meanwhile, Zuckerberg appears to be taking steps to align more neutrally with American politics. Meta lifted Trump’s suspension from Facebook and Instagram, which had been imposed in 2021 for what the platform described as “praise for people engaged in violence” during the January 6 riots.

In a further sign of detente, Zuckerberg recently expressed regret for downplaying content about Hunter Biden during the 2020 election and has pledged not to fund electoral infrastructure again after a controversial $400 million donation during that cycle.

Dinner Discussions

Details of what was discussed over dinner remain unclear. However, Meta has faced increasing regulatory pressure, including an ongoing antitrust case from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This meeting could reflect Zuckerberg’s efforts to improve relations with an administration that may influence his company’s future.

Trump and Musk: A Contrasting Dynamic

While Zuckerberg’s interactions with Trump have warmed, they pale in comparison to Trump’s bond with Elon Musk. The X owner has reportedly contributed over $100 million to Trump’s campaign, earning the nickname “First Buddy” in political circles—a playful nod to the traditional title of First Lady.

Musk’s support has landed him a prominent role in Trump’s government, heading the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which may grant him influence over policy and regulations affecting his business ventures.

Rivalry Between Tech Titans

Despite Musk and Zuckerberg’s interactions with Trump, their own rivalry continues. Tensions date back to a 2016 SpaceX rocket explosion that destroyed a Facebook satellite. Their feud escalated to a war of words over a proposed cage fight, though such a spectacle seems unlikely to materialize.

As these relationships evolve, the intersections of politics and Big Tech will remain in sharp focus. For Zuckerberg, his dinner with Trump may be a step toward reshaping his role in this dynamic landscape.

Source

The post From Rivals to Dinner Guests: Zuckerberg and Trump’s Surprising Encounter appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

First on CNN: President-elect Donald Trump has chosen South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem to serve as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), according to sources familiar with the decision.

Key Appointment in Trump’s Immigration Policy Team

Noem’s selection aligns with Trump’s commitment to prioritize immigration reform and enforcement, a major pillar of his domestic policy. Two well-known immigration hardliners, Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, are also expected to join DHS in senior positions, signaling that Trump intends to push forward with his tough stance on immigration.

By appointing Noem—a loyal supporter of Trump’s policies—Trump ensures that a trusted ally will helm DHS, an agency crucial to his administration’s objectives.

Turbulent History at DHS

During Trump’s first term, DHS experienced considerable upheaval, with five different leaders, only two of whom were confirmed by the Senate. The department, which operates with a budget of $60 billion and employs hundreds of thousands of staff, oversees a wide range of responsibilities, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the U.S. Secret Service.

Noem’s Background on Immigration and Tribal Issues

Though Noem hails from a non-border state, she has consistently supported strict immigration policies. As a Congressional candidate in 2010, she backed Senate Republicans in their bid to block an Obama-era lawsuit challenging Arizona’s stringent immigration laws. She has also advocated penalizing Democratic-led “sanctuary cities” that protect undocumented immigrants by limiting cooperation with federal agencies.

As Governor, Noem faced controversy over comments directed at indigenous tribes in South Dakota, alleging they were more focused on drug cartel profits than on their communities’ well-being. Her remarks led to her being banned from some tribal lands. If confirmed, Noem’s role as DHS Secretary would involve overseeing departments that regularly engage in tribal affairs.

Noem’s Loyalty to Trump

Since taking office as governor in 2019, Noem has modeled her political approach after Trump’s, often aligning with his policies. She opposed COVID-19 safety mandates, including mask requirements and closures, and was vocal in her defense of gun rights, once joking at an NRA event that her 2-year-old grandchild owns multiple firearms. Noem also famously gifted Trump a Mount Rushmore replica featuring his likeness among the American presidents.

Trump has praised Noem, calling her a “terrific person.” While she was initially considered a top choice for his vice-presidential pick in the 2024 election, she eventually fell off the shortlist. In a subsequent memoir, No Going Back: The Truth on What’s Wrong with Politics and How We Move America Forward, Noem revealed a controversial story in which she euthanized her family’s 14-month-old hunting dog. She explained that the story was meant to illustrate her ability to make tough decisions when necessary.

Closing Weeks of the Campaign and Continued Alignment with Trump

In the final stages of the 2024 campaign, Noem was actively involved in strategy discussions with Trump’s team, even questioning the findings of campaign analysts about the race’s status. She also took on the role of moderator at an October town hall event where Trump spent over 30 minutes swaying to music, creating a memorable moment on the campaign trail.

Noem’s appointment as Homeland Security Secretary underscores Trump’s dedication to reshaping the agency with officials who share his immigration vision and commitment to national security.

Source

The post Kristi Noem Appointed as Homeland Security Chief: A Trump Loyalist in Charge appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The 2024 United States elections will take place on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, marking one of the most significant events in American democracy. These elections will determine the next president and vice president, shaping the future political landscape of the country. As the current political climate evolves, voters will have the opportunity to cast their ballots for candidates who will guide the nation through the next four years. The outcome of this election will influence key issues such as healthcare, climate change, foreign policy, and economic recovery in a post-pandemic world.

The 2024 election will be especially pivotal because of the long-standing political divide that has come to characterize American politics. On one hand, incumbent President Joe Biden’s decision to exit the race has given Vice President Kamala Harris a clear path to becoming the Democratic candidate, while former President Donald Trump has re-entered the fray, pushing forward a conservative, right-wing agenda. With Biden stepping aside, many voters are looking for a fresh perspective, while others remain supportive of his administration’s policies. Harris, who would be the first woman of color to hold the office of president, promises a more inclusive and optimistic vision for the future, whereas Trump’s campaign is centered around a more divisive and populist approach.

As Americans head to the polls, the election will see a high level of participation, with early voting already in full swing. In fact, millions of voters across the country have already cast their ballots ahead of the official Election Day, and projections indicate that turnout could be one of the highest in recent history. Given the competitive nature of this race, it’s possible that the results may not be clear immediately. Like past elections in 2000 and 2020, we may experience delays in determining the winner, as states begin to tally votes and address potential legal challenges.

In addition to the presidential election, voters will also be deciding on key races for the U.S. Senate, House of Representatives, and state and local offices. These elections will play a crucial role in determining the balance of power in Washington, D.C., and in state governments across the nation. The outcome will influence the direction of legislative action on everything from the economy to social justice reform.

Looking beyond 2024, the following presidential election will take place in 2028, but the outcomes of the current election will shape the political landscape for years to come. The 2024 election is not just a contest for the presidency but a battle over the values and direction of the country, touching upon issues like voting rights, climate policy, racial justice, and national security. With so much at stake, the 2024 election is shaping up to be a historic and highly consequential event for the United States.

2024 U.S. Elections

2024 U.S. Presidential Elections

Source

Image: Shutterstock

The post The Stakes of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: A Nation at a Crossroads appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The 2024 U.S. presidential election, scheduled for November 5, has captured global attention. With tens of millions of Americans heading to the polls, the outcome could have profound effects on the global economy, climate policy, and international relations. Here’s an overview of how U.S. presidential elections work and what’s at stake.

How the U.S. Elects Its President

U.S. presidential elections occur every four years, following a primary process in which the two major political parties—Democratic and Republican—select their candidates through state caucuses and primaries. This year, former President Donald Trump is the Republican nominee, while current Vice President Kamala Harris is representing the Democratic Party after President Joe Biden chose not to seek re-election.

After months of campaigning, candidates encourage voters to vote early or on election day, November 5, 2024. This election date was set in 1845 by Congress, ensuring that elections fall on “the Tuesday after the first Monday in November.” This timing originally accommodated the agrarian lifestyle of 19th-century America, allowing citizens to vote after harvest and before winter.

In the modern era, Americans must register to vote in their home state. They can cast their ballots in person on election day, vote early, or use absentee ballots.

The Electoral College Explained

The U.S. presidential election isn’t decided by a direct popular vote but rather by the Electoral College system. Each state is allocated electoral votes based on its number of representatives in Congress. States like California have a high number of electoral votes (54), while states like Wyoming have only three. In total, there are 538 electoral votes, and a candidate needs 270 to win the presidency.

When voters cast their ballots, they are voting for a slate of electors who have pledged to support their chosen candidate. Most states follow a “winner-takes-all” system, where the candidate who wins the popular vote in the state receives all its electoral votes. However, Maine and Nebraska use a proportional system.

Once all the votes are counted, state electors will meet in their respective capitals to formally cast their votes for president and vice president. The final results are then certified in January during a joint session of Congress, with the new president taking office on January 20, 2025.

The Electoral College system has sparked debate, as it allows for scenarios where a candidate wins the presidency without winning the national popular vote, as happened in 2000 and 2016.

The Significance of Voter Turnout and Societal Polarization

Voter turnout has surged in recent U.S. elections. In 2020, over 158 million Americans voted, equating to 65.9% of the voting-age population—a rise from 59.2% in 2016. High turnout reflects both increased civic engagement and heightened polarization across the U.S.

The 2024 election occurs in a year filled with global elections, with over 2 billion people across 50 countries heading to the polls. This wave of democratic engagement coincides with growing ideological and cultural divisions, particularly in the U.S., where societal polarization has deepened. The World Economic Forum’s 2024 Global Risks Report highlights this trend, noting that polarization ranks among the top three short-term risks worldwide, due to its potential to destabilize societies, disrupt economies, and paralyze decision-making.

As Americans prepare to vote, this year’s election will not only shape U.S. policies but could also influence global stability, international relations, and economic trends for years to come.

Source

The post How the U.S. Chooses Its President: A Guide to the 2024 Election appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In this highly anticipated episode, which spanned three hours, Rogan prompted Trump to share his emotions as he entered the iconic residence in January 2017.

“It was incredibly surreal… When I was shot, that didn’t feel surreal. That should have been surreal,” Trump remarked, referencing the first assassination attempt against him in July.

“As I drove down Pennsylvania Avenue, I was struck by the sheer number of motorcycles, police, and military personnel… I wanted to step out and wave to the crowd, but I realized that wouldn’t have been wise,” he continued. “Yet, I genuinely felt—it’s hard to describe—the love was overwhelming.”

Rogan further inquired about Trump’s feelings regarding his capacity to govern, given that he had never held an elected office prior to assuming the presidency. “This is your first experience in governance… and now you find yourself inside the White House,” Rogan pointed out.

“The most significant aspect was that initial moment of being within this revered, truly revered place,” Trump replied. “For me, that was the defining experience; it was profoundly surreal.”

Source

The post Trump Reflects on Surreal First Day in the White House with Joe Rogan appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.