Should Social Media Be Banned for Under-16s? Australia’s Bold Proposal Sparks Debate

Addressing the Rise of Online Bullying: Should Social Media Be Banned for Under-16s?

The rapid evolution of social media has transformed how young people connect, but it has also brought significant challenges, including cyberbullying and harmful online behavior. These issues are at the heart of Australia’s heated debate over proposed legislation to ban social media use for children under 16.

A Cyber Safety Expert’s Eye-Opening Experience

Kirra Pendergast, a cyber safety educator, has spent years educating teenagers about the risks of online behavior. However, a recent incident left her shocked and emotionally shaken. During a presentation at an Australian high school, a group of 12- and 13-year-old boys began shouting misogynistic slurs inspired by online influencers. Despite efforts from teachers to calm the students, the hostility escalated, culminating in an expletive-filled remark from a girl that drove Pendergast to leave the session in tears.

“This behavior is clearly driven by things they’ve seen online, and it has to change,” she said in a heartfelt video afterward.

Once an opponent of banning social media for children, Pendergast has shifted her stance. “Ban it. Just ban it,” she declared, citing her frustration with the toxic influence of social platforms on young minds.

Proposed Legislation: A Bold Move

The Australian government is pushing for a “world-leading” law that would prohibit children under 16 from accessing platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter). If passed, social media companies that fail to enforce this ban could face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($32 million).

The legislation proposes age verification measures to ensure compliance, though critics argue that such measures raise privacy concerns. The government has pledged to address these issues within the framework of the law.

A Growing Crisis: The Cost of Inaction

The urgency behind the legislation is underscored by tragic cases of young lives lost due to online bullying. Two 12-year-old girls, Charlotte O’Brien and Ella Catley-Crawford, took their own lives after being targeted on platforms like Snapchat. Their families have since become advocates for stricter age limits on social media, presenting a petition with over 124,000 signatures to raise the minimum age from 13 to 16.

Charlotte’s parents, Matthew Howard and Kelly O’Brien, described the devastating impact of online bullying. “No parent wants to go through what we’re going through,” Howard said, emphasizing the need for change.

Supporters and Critics of the Ban

Proponents of the ban argue that it could save lives and shield children from harm during formative years. Clinical psychologist Dr. Danielle Einstein supports the measure, noting that social media often replaces critical face-to-face interactions, limiting children’s ability to resolve conflicts and build meaningful relationships.

However, critics believe the legislation is a blunt tool that may drive children toward unregulated parts of the internet. A joint letter signed by more than 140 experts called the ban a rushed response that shifts responsibility away from tech companies to create safer platforms.

Amanda Third, co-director of the Young and Resilient Research Centre, opposes the ban, arguing that the current minimum age of 13 is appropriate for many children. She warns that the legislation is politically motivated, with upcoming federal elections and a media campaign by News Corp possibly influencing the push for stricter regulations.

Tech Industry Pushback

Tech companies have expressed concerns about the proposed ban. During a Senate hearing, Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, reiterated its zero-tolerance policy for bullying, urging users to report and block offenders. Instagram, owned by Meta, launched an anti-bullying campaign to promote strategies for handling online harassment. However, these efforts have been criticized as insufficient by parents and advocates.

What’s at Stake?

The debate continues to polarize parents, educators, and policymakers. While some see the ban as a necessary step to protect children, others worry about its potential downsides, including privacy concerns and enforcement challenges.

Cyber safety educator Pendergast believes that even one life saved justifies the legislation. “Why would we deny a child that protection?” she asked. “The only ones losing while we argue are the kids.”

The proposed law has sparked a national conversation about the role of social media in children’s lives, the responsibilities of tech companies, and the broader societal impacts of digital platforms. As Australia moves toward a decision, the world will be watching to see how this bold experiment unfolds.

Source