Hong Kong’s Richest Man Faces Backlash Over Panama Ports Deal

Hong Kong Tycoon Li Ka-shing Under Fire Over Panama Canal Ports Deal

Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing, is facing scrutiny after his company, CK Hutchison Holdings, decided to sell its Panama Canal port assets to a consortium that includes U.S. investment giant BlackRock Inc., a move that has reportedly angered Beijing.

Beijing’s Reaction to the Deal

Over the past week, China’s Hong Kong affairs offices have published critical commentaries from state-backed media outlets condemning the transaction. The controversy raises questions about the deal’s future and highlights the complex challenges Hong Kong businesses face in balancing Beijing’s political expectations with their own capitalist interests.

Who is Li Ka-shing?

Nicknamed “Superman,” Li Ka-shing, 96, is one of the world’s 50 richest people, with a net worth of $38 billion, according to Forbes. Although he retired as chairman of CK Hutchison in 2018, handing over leadership to his son Victor Li, he remains one of Hong Kong’s most influential business figures.

Li’s empire spans real estate, retail, telecommunications, and utilities. His global assets include the British drugstore chain Superdrug and European mobile network operator Three.

Li’s Relationship with Beijing

Li has long maintained close ties with China’s Communist Party leadership and previously served on the elite committee responsible for selecting Hong Kong’s chief executive. Beijing once valued Hong Kong’s business elite for their global networks and resources, which played a crucial role in China’s economic development.

However, Li has faced political backlash for his business decisions. In 2015, he was criticized for selling off mainland Chinese assets. During the 2019 pro-democracy protests, he was also attacked by pro-Beijing supporters for not taking a strong enough stance against the movement.

The Panama Canal Ports Deal

On March 4, CK Hutchison announced the sale of its global port assets—including the Balboa and Cristobal ports at the Panama Canal—to a consortium that includes:

• BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners
• Terminal Investment Limited (chaired by Italian shipping magnate Diego Aponte)

The deal, valued at nearly $23 billion, includes $5 billion in debt but excludes ports in Hong Kong or mainland China. CK Hutchison insists the transaction is purely commercial.

Geopolitical Ramifications: U.S. vs. China

The deal has pleased the Trump administration but angered Beijing. A Beijing-backed newspaper described it as a “betrayal of all Chinese”, while another commentary suggested that true “great entrepreneurs” must be patriotic and not align with the U.S.

On Chinese social media platform Weibo, public sentiment has largely been critical of Li, with many condemning the move as disloyal to China.

Strategic Importance of Ports

Ports are highly strategic assets, and transactions involving them often attract political scrutiny. Some reports suggest Beijing was not consulted before the sale, which may have contributed to its frustration.

According to Wilson Chan, co-founder of the Pagoda Institute, canceling the deal now would be risky:

“You just let Trump take credit for it, then you later say ‘Sorry, I’m canceling the deal.’ Imagine Trump’s reaction—this would affect how the world views Hong Kong’s business autonomy.”

For now, CK Hutchison has remained silent, choosing not to address the controversy directly in its 2024 financial results announcement.

Long-Term Implications for Hong Kong

The controversy underscores ongoing tensions between Beijing and private businesses in Hong Kong.

• The Trump administration previously sanctioned Chinese and Hong Kong officials for undermining the city’s autonomy.
• Beijing has tightened its grip on Hong Kong since the 2019 pro-democracy protests.
• Some analysts suggest Li may attempt to appease critics by reinvesting proceeds from the deal into projects that align with Beijing’s policies.

According to George Chen of The Asia Group, the situation illustrates how Washington’s concerns over Hong Kong’s business autonomy are well-founded:

“This is bad for the defense of ‘one country, two systems.’”

As tensions escalate, all eyes will be on whether Beijing exerts more pressure on Li Ka-shing and whether Trump’s administration retaliates with new sanctions.