According to The Associated Press, Trump used the visit to defend the large-scale redevelopment effort after Senate lawmakers raised concerns about the cost and political timing of the proposal during an election year marked by inflation pressures and instability tied to the Iran conflict.

The administration argues the project is necessary to modernize White House event and security infrastructure, while critics in Congress question whether taxpayer funding should support elements connected to the president’s long-promoted ballroom expansion. The dispute has widened into a broader debate over executive spending priorities and congressional oversight authority.

Trump said the ballroom itself would be privately financed through donations and his own contributions, while federal funding would focus on security systems surrounding the White House complex.

Congressional Scrutiny Expands

The political conflict intensified after the Senate parliamentarian ruled that the administration’s proposed security funding could not remain inside a Republican-backed immigration enforcement package advancing through budget reconciliation procedures.

Several Republican lawmakers have also expressed discomfort with the scale of the request, particularly as voters continue facing high fuel and grocery prices. The administration has linked the enhanced security measures to evolving national security threats, including risks posed by drones and attacks on federal facilities.

Trump showcased multiple security-related features during the tour, including reinforced structural materials, underground facilities, and rooftop drone infrastructure that he claimed would strengthen White House protection capabilities.

Executive Expansion Faces Institutional Resistance

The ballroom project has become one of the most visible construction efforts undertaken at the White House in decades. The development replaced the former East Wing and is expected to include a large event space designed to host state functions and major gatherings.

Preservation groups and legal challengers argue the project exceeds traditional executive authority over White House modifications and should require deeper congressional review. Federal court disputes over construction approvals and historic preservation requirements have already delayed portions of the development.

The administration maintains the project carries long-term national security value beyond ceremonial functions, particularly after security concerns emerged following violent incidents at public political events earlier this year.

Oversight Debate Intensifies

The funding dispute reflects broader tensions between Congress and the executive branch over emergency spending, infrastructure authority, and presidential control over federal facilities. Democrats have criticized the proposal as an inappropriate use of taxpayer money, while some Republicans remain divided over balancing security concerns with fiscal restraint.

Trump has continued framing the ballroom as a long-term institutional investment intended for future administrations rather than a personal project. Still, the controversy surrounding financing, construction authority, and preservation challenges has transformed the development into a politically sensitive test of executive influence over federal infrastructure decisions.

The post Trump Defends White House Ballroom Project Amid Senate Resistance to Security Funding appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The material, reviewed through Pentagon-linked investigations and congressional interest in unidentified aerial phenomena, reflects growing pressure on U.S. defense institutions to publicly address incidents involving unexplained objects observed by military personnel. Reporting from The Associated Press indicates that while officials acknowledged unusual observations, investigators stopped short of confirming extraterrestrial explanations.

The renewed attention comes as lawmakers in Washington, D.C. continue to push for broader disclosure requirements involving military surveillance data and intelligence reporting. Analysts say the issue has evolved beyond public fascination with UFOs into a wider debate over government accountability and classified defense programs.

Officials involved in recent Pentagon reviews described incidents ranging from glowing airborne spheres to unexplained high-speed movements observed near military training zones. However, investigators repeatedly emphasized that many cases lacked sufficient data for definitive conclusions.

Institutional Oversight Expands

The Pentagon’s handling of unidentified aerial phenomena has increasingly become a matter of congressional oversight rather than fringe speculation. Bipartisan lawmakers have pressed defense officials for greater transparency regarding how incidents are documented, investigated and communicated to the public.

Several hearings in recent years have focused on whether federal agencies properly assessed potential security threats connected to unexplained airborne activity. Defense officials have argued that even incidents ultimately explained as drones, atmospheric effects or sensor anomalies still warrant examination because of possible implications for military readiness.

The latest records underscore how intelligence agencies are attempting to balance national security concerns with rising public demands for disclosure. Analysts interviewed by multiple U.S. outlets noted that the absence of definitive explanations has allowed speculation to persist despite years of investigations.

Political Pressure on Defense Agencies Grows

The issue gained broader political traction after senior U.S. officials publicly acknowledged the existence of military footage showing unexplained aerial encounters. That shift marked a significant departure from decades of limited official engagement on the topic.

Under mounting political pressure, the Pentagon established dedicated offices tasked with reviewing historical cases and coordinating reporting procedures across defense branches. Government officials said the objective was to create standardized methods for evaluating sightings while reducing misinformation surrounding the issue.

Critics, however, argue that federal agencies remain overly secretive about classified surveillance capabilities and investigative findings. Some lawmakers have called for expanded declassification efforts, contending that excessive secrecy has fueled conspiracy theories and weakened institutional credibility.

National Security Questions Remain Unresolved

While many incidents reviewed by investigators have ultimately been linked to conventional explanations, officials acknowledged that a portion of reported cases remain unresolved due to insufficient evidence or incomplete sensor data.

Security analysts say the central concern for policymakers is not necessarily extraterrestrial life but whether unidentified objects could represent foreign surveillance technologies or gaps in U.S. detection systems. That framing has shifted the debate from popular culture into the realm of strategic defense policy.

The Pentagon has repeatedly stated that no verified evidence currently links the reviewed incidents to alien activity. Nonetheless, the persistence of unexplained reports continues to attract public and congressional attention, particularly as geopolitical competition intensifies around advanced aerospace technologies.

Transparency Debate Likely to Continue

The continuing release of records is expected to sustain pressure on federal agencies to clarify how future sightings will be investigated and disclosed. Lawmakers overseeing defense and intelligence committees are likely to continue seeking briefings on unresolved incidents and reporting procedures.

Political analysts say the broader institutional challenge lies in maintaining public confidence while protecting sensitive intelligence capabilities. As investigations continue, the issue remains positioned at the intersection of national security, government transparency and public skepticism toward federal institutions.

The post Pentagon UFO Review Intensifies Debate Over Government Transparency and National Security appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

The decision, announced as funding for the department remains stalled in Washington, is expected to slow airport processing times across the country. Officials say resources are being redirected to core security operations while political negotiations over immigration policy continue.

Travelers who have paid for expedited screening and customs processing may now face standard security lines as the standoff stretches into a second week.

Programs halted as shutdown pressures mount

In a statement, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the funding lapse was already having tangible consequences.

“Shutdowns have serious real world consequences,” Noem said, adding that the Transportation Security Administration and U.S. Customs and Border Protection were prioritizing the general traveling population at airports and ports of entry. She said the agencies would suspend what she described as “courtesy and special privilege escorts.”

TSA PreCheck allows approved passengers to move through dedicated security lanes without removing shoes, belts, or light jackets. Global Entry provides expedited customs processing for pre-approved, low-risk international travelers returning to the United States.

Both programs operate under the Department of Homeland Security and require background checks, interviews, and application fees. Their suspension does not halt airport security operations but removes faster screening options for enrolled travelers.

Political standoff drives funding gap

The partial shutdown began on Feb. 14 after lawmakers failed to pass legislation funding the Department of Homeland Security. The impasse centers on immigration policy.

Democrats have pushed for changes to immigration enforcement operations, arguing that existing measures are too closely aligned with President Donald Trump’s deportation agenda. The White House and Republican lawmakers have resisted those demands, leading to the lapse in appropriations.

While other federal agencies remain funded, Homeland Security functions without new congressional authorization, forcing adjustments in staffing and operations. Essential security services continue, but administrative and customer-facing programs are often among the first affected during funding gaps.

The suspension of TSA PreCheck and Global Entry marks one of the most visible impacts on the traveling public since the shutdown began.

Lawmakers criticize move

Democrats on the House Committee on Homeland Security criticized the decision, accusing the administration of undermining widely used programs that streamline travel while maintaining security standards.

In social media posts, committee members said the administration was “kneecapping the programs that make travel smoother and secure” and suggested the move would unnecessarily disrupt passengers.

The department has not indicated how long the suspension will remain in effect. Historically, government shutdowns have produced uneven operational impacts depending on staffing levels and agency contingency planning.

For frequent flyers, the programs have become a routine part of domestic and international travel. TSA PreCheck, introduced in 2011, has expanded to hundreds of airports and dozens of airline partners. Global Entry, launched earlier, is commonly used by business travelers and U.S. citizens returning from abroad.

Industry analysts note that while core aviation security remains intact, even modest increases in screening times can ripple through airport systems, particularly during peak travel periods. Airlines typically adjust staffing and boarding timelines during federal disruptions, but delays can compound quickly.

As negotiations continue in Washington, the suspension underscores how budget disputes can reach beyond Capitol Hill into everyday travel logistics.

Travelers scheduled to fly in the coming days are being advised to arrive earlier than usual and monitor updates from airlines and airport authorities.

Source: AP News – Homeland Security suspends TSA PreCheck and Global Entry airport security programs

The post Homeland Security Suspends TSA PreCheck and Global Entry Programs During Government Shutdown appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, once one of Donald Trump’s most outspoken allies in Congress, announced she will step down from her seat early next year. Her departure marks a significant rupture inside the Republican Party, as Greene says the relationship that defined her political rise has now collapsed amid disputes over policy, leadership, and personal loyalty.

Greene confirmed her resignation in a ten-minute online video, saying she has “never fit in” in Washington and had grown increasingly isolated. Her announcement follows months of direct criticism of the former president, who turned on her after disagreements over classified files, foreign policy, and health care. Trump has since labeled her a “traitor,” signaling he would support a primary challenger in 2026.

She said her final day in office will be 5 January 2026.

Greene Announces Early Departure From Congress

Greene used her video statement to outline the pressures she faced in Congress, saying she believed her independence on several issues angered fellow Republicans and the former president. She said she had supported Trump consistently since entering politics in 2020 but felt he had not shown the same loyalty in return.

“Loyalty should be a two-way street,” Greene said. She added that lawmakers should be able to “vote our conscience and represent our district’s interest,” noting that the role of a representative requires independence, even when it clashes with party leadership.

Her remarks reflected months of growing distance between her and Trump, who had once championed her as a rising star within the “Make America Great Again” movement. Their relationship deteriorated after Greene publicly criticized his approach to the release of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case and questioned elements of his health and foreign policy positions.

The White House did not comment on her announcement.

A Political Career Defined by Controversy and Influence

Greene entered Congress in 2021 after a landslide victory in Georgia’s 14th District. She quickly became a polarizing figure, attracting national attention for promoting the QAnon conspiracy movement and appearing at events with white supremacist activists. While Republican leaders often distanced themselves from her views, Trump repeatedly defended her and praised her as “a real WINNER!”

Despite the controversies, Greene cultivated influence within the party. She became a close ally of Kevin McCarthy during his rise to House speaker in 2023, helping him secure support from the Republican conference’s right flank. Her loyalty during internal party battles earned her leverage within the House GOP, though McCarthy’s ouster later that year significantly weakened her bloc.

Fallout With Trump Reshapes Her Political Future

The deterioration of Greene’s relationship with Trump unfolded publicly throughout 2024 and 2025. She criticized Trump for what she viewed as inconsistencies in policy and transparency, particularly regarding documents tied to the long-running Epstein investigation. Trump retaliated by challenging her credibility and questioning her political future.

During recent interviews, Trump said he intended to endorse a challenger against her in the upcoming primary, calling her “wacky” and “disloyal.” For Greene, this represented a dramatic reversal from the former president who once relied on her support in Congress to reinforce his influence.

Political analysts told AP and Reuters in recent coverage that Greene’s departure underscores a broader shift in Republican internal dynamics, as prominent figures who built their careers around Trump’s political identity reassess their long-term prospects.

Impact on Congress and the 2026 Elections

Greene joins a growing list of lawmakers from both parties opting not to run for reelection as the 2025 congressional session has been marked by legislative gridlock and factional divides. Her exit is expected to alter the balance within the House GOP, where she has been both an influential strategist and a divisive presence.

Her future plans remain unclear. Some observers believe she could pursue a media career or a statewide campaign, while others speculate she may attempt to rebuild influence within conservative grassroots networks.

Republican leaders in Georgia are preparing for what is expected to be a competitive primary in her district, which leans heavily Republican but has seen internal party challenges in recent years.

For now, Greene says she plans to complete her term but will not return after January 2026. “I have always worked for my district and stayed true to what I believe,” she said. “But Washington was never a place that embraced me, and that’s okay. It’s time to take a different path.”

Source: AP News – Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, former Trump loyalist, says she is resigning from Congress

The post Resignation of Marjorie Taylor Greene Signals Major Rift in U.S. Republican Politics appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

U.S. lawmakers have passed a bipartisan bill requiring the Justice Department to release its case files on Jeffrey Epstein. The release will begin a 30-day countdown once President Donald Trump signs the measure. Supporters say the move is a major step toward public transparency in an investigation that has drawn global attention. Officials expect the disclosure to be extensive, though some sensitive information will still be redacted.

The Push for Full Disclosure

Congress approved the bill with strong support in both the House and Senate. The vote follows rising pressure from the public and lawmakers to reveal long-sealed records connected to Epstein.

Trump had previously opposed the measure but later changed course and agreed to sign it. Once the law takes effect, the Justice Department will be required to publish what many call the “Epstein files,” a collection estimated at about 100,000 pages.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said the bill calls for full openness. He described it as “a command for the president to be fully honest with the American people.” Schumer also said lawmakers would act if they believe the administration is limiting access or delaying the release.

Interest in the case has grown because of Epstein’s ties to political figures and public leaders, including Trump, former President Bill Clinton, and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew. The upcoming disclosure is expected to draw significant attention across political, legal, and diplomatic circles.

What the Bill Requires

The legislation orders Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all federal investigative materials involving Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for trafficking and helping Epstein abuse minors.

The files to be released include:

• Federal investigative records involving Epstein

• Documents linked to Maxwell and other associates

• Internal DOJ and FBI communications

• Records on Epstein’s 2019 death in federal custody

A federal judge has said the full record contains around 100,000 pages.

Bondi said the department will follow the law “with maximum transparency while protecting victims.” The bill allows redactions to shield personal information about victims, child sexual abuse materials, and information related to national security or foreign policy.

Limits, Exemptions, and Concerns

The bill also permits the Justice Department to withhold information that could affect active investigations or ongoing prosecutions. Some lawmakers worry this clause could be used to delay or block access by labeling new inquiries as “active.”

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who broke with Trump over the bill, said the administration’s response will be a “real test” of its commitment to transparency.

Rep. Thomas Massie, the bill’s sponsor, rejected concerns about excessive withholding. He argued that prosecutors could not start enough investigations to cover all material in the files. “And if they do,” he added, “then good.”

The bill also requires the DOJ to explain any redactions or withheld items within 15 days of the release. It bars officials from hiding information to prevent embarrassment or political fallout, including for public officials or foreign dignitaries.

Who Might Be Named?

Epstein’s federal investigations stretched more than a decade. They included interviews with victims, associates, and well-known individuals who interacted with him socially or professionally. Because of this, the files may reference many public figures. Being named, however, does not mean someone committed a crime.

Epstein maintained ties with political leaders, philanthropists, academics, and wealthy business executives. A recent House Oversight Committee release showed emails between Epstein and several high-profile individuals, including Trump and others with global influence.

Legal and Ethical Issues

Federal prosecutors must follow strict rules about what information can be shared publicly. House Speaker Mike Johnson voiced concern that the bill might expose victims or release unverified claims about people who contacted investigators. Still, he voted for the bill without proposing changes.

Survivors of Epstein’s abuse have long pushed for a public accounting. Many believe the files may show who was aware of Epstein’s actions and how authorities responded over the years. Some survivors say they hesitate to name individuals without official documents, fearing legal retaliation.

Massie has said he wants the FBI’s interview summaries with victims released. These reports often contain untested statements, but Massie and Greene have both offered to read names aloud on the House floor, which would protect them from defamation suits.

“We need names,” Massie said, arguing that transparency could help bring accountability.

What Happens Next

If Trump signs the bill soon, the Justice Department’s 30-day countdown will start immediately. Transparency advocates say this could be one of the largest releases of federal investigative material in years.

The disclosures may influence political debates in Washington and shape ongoing legal discussions. They may also spark new investigations, congressional hearings, and calls for reforms focused on victims’ rights and government transparency.

As the release date approaches, lawmakers, survivor groups, and legal experts are preparing for intense public interest. They expect significant debate over what the files reveal and how the Justice Department managed the case.

Source: AP News – What’s next once Trump signs bill releasing the Epstein files

The post Congress Presses Trump to Release Full Epstein Case Files After Bipartisan Bill Passes appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

U.S. lawmakers approved a sweeping bipartisan measure ordering the Justice Department to disclose its files on Jeffrey Epstein, delivering a major victory for survivors who have pressed for transparency for years. The rapid action capped months of political tension, shifting positions, and mounting public pressure on the Trump administration and congressional leaders.

Congress Moves Swiftly on Epstein File Disclosure

The U.S. Congress moved with rare unanimity on Tuesday, passing legislation that compels the Justice Department to release its full case files on Jeffrey Epstein within 30 days. The measure, long stalled by political resistance, surged forward after an unexpected wave of bipartisan support in both the House and Senate.

The House approved the bill 427–1, with the sole dissenting vote cast by Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana, who argued that unredacted disclosures could jeopardize individuals who were referenced but never charged. Within hours, Senate leaders signaled they would adopt the measure through unanimous consent once procedural steps are completed.

The legislation marks the most forceful congressional intervention to date in the yearslong push to illuminate federal handling of Epstein’s case, his network of associates, and the circumstances surrounding his 2019 death in a Manhattan federal detention center.

Months of Political Resistance Collapse Under Pressure

Initial efforts to advance the bill appeared unlikely to succeed when a bipartisan group of House lawmakers filed a discharge petition in July, attempting to bypass House leadership. At the time, President Donald Trump publicly dismissed the proposed disclosure requirements as a “hoax,” while House Speaker Mike Johnson resisted bringing the bill to a floor vote.

Despite early hurdles, support grew steadily among lawmakers, survivor advocacy groups, and even segments of the Republican base. As momentum built, the Trump administration reversed its stance. Trump announced on Sunday that Republicans should support the bill, clearing the way for near-unanimous passage.

Speaker Johnson also shifted his position, allowing a vote under a procedure requiring two-thirds approval. Although Johnson criticized potential unintended consequences relating to privacy protections and investigative integrity, he ultimately voted in favor, stating that lawmakers “did not want to be accused of opposing maximum transparency.”

Survivors Rally as Public Demands Transparency

Outside the Capitol, survivors of Epstein’s abuse gathered ahead of the vote, urging lawmakers to end years of political standoffs. Wrapped in coats against the November cold, several held photographs of their teenage selves — a powerful reminder of the human impact behind the policy debate.

“We are exhausted from surviving the trauma and then surviving the politics that swirl around it,” one survivor told reporters.

Another survivor, Jena-Lisa Jones, who previously supported Trump, publicly called on him to stop framing the disclosure effort as a political attack, saying, “I beg you, Donald Trump, please stop making this political.”

Their presence underscored the frustration that had grown over repeated delays. A key hold-up occurred during the government shutdown earlier this year, when Johnson kept the House closed for legislative business and postponed the swearing-in of Representative Adelita Grijalva of Arizona. Grijalva’s vote was essential to reaching the 218 signatures required for the discharge petition. She signed the petition only after officially taking office last week, ensuring the bill’s advancement.

What the Bill Requires

The legislation mandates the release of all federal files, communications, and investigative materials related to Epstein, including documents tied to the probe into his death. The Justice Department may redact details that would reveal the identities of victims or interfere with ongoing investigations, but the bill explicitly prohibits withholding information due to reputational concerns or political embarrassment.

Lawmakers who sponsored the bill — Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democrat Ro Khanna of California — said the intent is clear: to provide public accountability after years of questions about Epstein’s connections and the failures that allowed him to continue operating for so long.

A separate House Oversight Committee inquiry has already released thousands of pages of documents from Epstein’s estate, revealing communication patterns involving high-profile business executives, political figures, and global leaders. In the United Kingdom, King Charles III previously stripped Prince Andrew of his royal duties following scrutiny over his association with Epstein.

Congressional Leaders React to Rapid Passage

The bipartisan vote prompted rare agreement across the aisle. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries described the outcome as “a complete and total surrender” by those who had tried to block the effort. Meanwhile, Speaker Johnson continued to warn that the Senate should consider amendments to further safeguard sensitive information relating to victims and whistleblowers.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, however, signaled little appetite for making changes, stating that amendments were “unlikely to be in the cards.” He said the Senate could fast-track approval as soon as Tuesday evening, adding that lawmakers needed to act quickly due to public expectations.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer also emphasized urgency, saying, “The American people have waited long enough.”

Sponsors Warn Against Delays in the Senate

Representatives Massie and Khanna urged senators not to alter the bill, warning that any changes could reignite the delays that have frustrated survivors and eroded public trust. “We’ve needlessly dragged this out for four months,” Massie said, adding that concerns about reputational harm only reinforce the need for full disclosure.

As Congress moves to finalize the legislation, the Justice Department will soon face a strict timeline to prepare the documents for public release — a process expected to draw significant global attention.

Source: AP News – Congress acts swiftly to force release of Epstein files, sending bill to Trump

The post Congress Overwhelmingly Backs Release of Epstein Files After Months of Delay appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

President Donald Trump has reversed his position on a bill that would compel the Justice Department to release files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, a move that follows significant pressure from within his own party. The shift highlights an unusual moment of internal Republican conflict as lawmakers prepare for a high-profile vote. Trump’s decision signals recognition that the measure is likely to pass the House despite earlier opposition.

Growing GOP Tensions Over Epstein Legislation

President Donald Trump’s call for House Republicans to support the release of records tied to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation marks a notable departure from his earlier stance. The president had previously resisted the proposal, but mounting internal pressure and a string of public endorsements from Republican lawmakers have altered the dynamic.

Trump made the announcement late Sunday after returning to Washington from a weekend in Florida. Posting on social media, he said Republicans should “vote to release the files,” describing the controversy as a “Democrat hoax” aimed at undermining the party’s broader agenda. His message attempted to redirect political attention, urging colleagues to “get back on point” as the legislation gained momentum.

The president’s reversal follows weeks of internal discord, including an increasingly public split with Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of his most vocal allies. The dispute reflects deeper tensions inside the GOP as lawmakers weigh political loyalty against demands for transparency around an investigation that has drawn intense public scrutiny.

Votes Appear Sufficient to Advance Measure

The shift also signals a tacit acknowledgment that House supporters may already have the numbers needed to push the bill forward. Republican advocates of the measure have projected a strong bipartisan outcome, framing the effort as a transparency initiative rather than a political confrontation.

By Monday, several lawmakers backing the plan predicted a “deluge” of Republican votes in support of releasing the files. The vote is expected to test the influence of party leadership and the limits of Trump’s sway over the House Republican Conference.

In recent weeks, the president personally contacted several GOP lawmakers who signed onto the bill, including Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, who visited administration officials at the White House Situation Room to discuss the measure.

What the Bill Would Do

The legislation requires the Justice Department to release all documents, records, and internal communications related to Jeffrey Epstein, including information surrounding his death in federal custody in 2019. Epstein, who faced federal sex-trafficking charges, died in jail while awaiting trial — an event ruled a suicide by the medical examiner, though it has long fueled public speculation and calls for transparency.

Under the bill, sensitive information involving Epstein’s victims or any ongoing federal investigations could be redacted to comply with legal protections and maintain investigatory integrity.

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, one of the bill’s principal proponents, told Sunday news programs that Republican support could surpass 100 votes. He also expressed hope of achieving a veto-proof majority. Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California initiated a discharge petition in July designed to bypass House leadership and force a floor vote — a procedure historically rare and typically difficult to execute.

House Leadership Signals Reluctant Acceptance

House Speaker Mike Johnson has previously opposed the discharge petition and had attempted to steer the chamber’s agenda away from the escalating pressure surrounding the Epstein records. Earlier this year, Republican leaders ended the House session early ahead of the August recess as calls for a vote intensified.

Democrats have also accused GOP leadership of stalling the seating of Arizona Rep. Adelita Grijalva to delay reaching the threshold required to advance the petition. Grijalva became the decisive 218th signature soon after being sworn into office.

Yet Johnson’s tone shifted as the vote approached. During an appearance on Fox News Sunday, he said he expected the House to “get this done,” insisting that there was “nothing to hide.” He also noted that the Oversight Committee had already released significant documentation related to the case.

Johnson rejected suggestions that the bill was part of a partisan attempt to target the president. “He has nothing to hide from this,” Johnson said, accusing Democrats of selectively leaking materials to draw Trump into the controversy.

Trump’s Historical Link to Epstein

President Trump’s connection to Epstein has long been part of the public record. His name appeared in documents released by the Justice Department earlier this year as part of an effort to address public interest in details from the sex-trafficking investigation.

Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with the case, and investigators have emphasized that the mere presence of an individual’s name in the records does not indicate legal culpability. Epstein, who maintained relationships with numerous high-profile individuals across politics, business, and entertainment, remains a central figure in public debates around accountability and institutional transparency.

Khanna, while optimistic about bipartisan support for the bill, offered a more conservative estimate than Massie. He said he hoped at least 40 Republicans would join the effort and urged Trump to meet with victims, some of whom are expected to attend a news conference at the Capitol this week.

Internal Republican Fractures Deepen

The legislation has also exposed growing schisms within the GOP. Three Republicans joined Massie in signing the discharge petition — Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace of South Carolina, and Lauren Boebert.

Trump’s feud with Greene intensified over the past week. After announcing he would back a primary challenger against her in 2026, the president issued further criticism on social media late Sunday, calling her a “traitor.” Greene responded by saying the disagreement “has all come down to the Epstein files,” emphasizing her belief that the American public deserves clarity on the matter.

Greene said she had no knowledge of what the files contain but questioned why the president initially opposed the release. She noted that conversations with constituents indicated that many believed Trump had done nothing wrong in connection with Epstein, intensifying her confusion over his earlier position.

Massie warned that the vote will leave a lasting record for Republicans concerned about political repercussions or losing Trump’s endorsement. He said lawmakers who oppose the measure risk alienating voters who want comprehensive disclosure.

Senate Outlook Remains Uncertain

Even with anticipated strong support in the House, passage in the Senate is less certain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has not indicated whether he will bring the bill to the floor if it arrives from the House with substantial bipartisan backing.

Massie said he hopes Thune will “do the right thing” if the measure advances, predicting that House results could create momentum across the Capitol. He said he expected “a deluge of Republicans” to vote in favor, a show of unity that he believes could influence the Senate.

The debate over the Epstein files continues to shape internal Republican dynamics, testing the boundaries of party loyalty, executive influence, and demands for public transparency. As the House prepares for the vote, the issue has become a rare example of congressional pressure prompting a shift from the president himself.

Source: AP News – In reversal, Trump says House Republicans should vote to release Epstein files

The post Trump Reverses Course, Urges House Republicans to Back Release of Epstein Files appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Source: AP News – Senate approves bill to end the shutdown, sending it to the House

The post U.S. Senate Passes Bill to End 41-Day Government Shutdown appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Funding Deal Gains Bipartisan Support

The legislation passed a procedural vote in the Senate on Sunday by a 60–40 margin, with eight Democrats joining Republicans to advance the bill. The package provides short-term funding to reopen government agencies through January 30, while also including full-year appropriations for agricultural programs, military construction, and veterans’ affairs through September 2026.

Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, described the vote as a long-overdue breakthrough. “This shutdown has gone on far too long,” Collins said, noting that securing yearlong appropriations for veterans’ programs ahead of Veterans Day was a significant achievement.

The bill ensures that states will be reimbursed for expenses incurred to keep the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) nutrition programs operational during the shutdown.

Health Care Subsidies Deferred for Later Vote

A central point of contention remains the expiration of federal health care subsidies that help millions of Americans afford insurance through the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Democrats had pushed to include an immediate extension of these subsidies, arguing that rising premiums would place additional strain on families.

While the current deal promises a Senate vote on the issue in December, the delay has frustrated several Democratic lawmakers. “The American people want us to stand and fight for health care,” said Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who voted against the bill.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer also opposed the measure, saying it failed to address the subsidies that millions depend on. Despite this opposition, the bill is expected to move forward, reflecting broad bipartisan desire to end the shutdown’s economic and social disruptions.

Relief for Federal Workers

The package offers long-awaited relief to federal employees, many of whom have gone weeks without pay. It reinstates workers who were furloughed or faced layoff notices and guarantees retroactive pay once the government reopens.

The Trump administration had previously signaled that back pay was not guaranteed, creating uncertainty for federal staff. The new measure eliminates that ambiguity, reaffirming the traditional commitment to compensate workers for missed wages during shutdowns.

Ongoing Political Challenges in Congress

Although Sunday’s procedural vote marked progress, several hurdles remain before the legislation can reach President Donald Trump’s desk. Lawmakers are attempting to fast-track the process to avoid another week of delays.

Some Republican senators have raised objections to specific provisions. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky opposed the measure due to concerns about a hemp-related clause, while a small group of conservative Republicans temporarily delayed proceedings as they sought to advance their own policy priorities.

Democrats in both chambers remain divided over how to handle the bill’s omission of health care funding. In the House of Representatives, Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York criticized the proposal, signaling that his caucus may refuse to support it.

“We will not support spending legislation advanced by Senate Republicans that fails to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits,” Jeffries said. “Donald Trump and the Republican Party own the toxic mess they have created.”

Next Steps Toward Reopening the Government

If the Senate passes the package, the measure will move to the House, where members are being recalled from recess to vote. Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana, who holds a narrow Republican majority, may need nearly all GOP members to approve the bill given Democratic resistance.

President Trump, returning to the White House on Sunday evening after attending a football game, signaled optimism about a resolution. “It looks like we’re getting close to the shutdown ending,” he told reporters.

Should both chambers approve the deal, federal agencies could resume operations within days, ending more than a month of stalled services, delayed paychecks, and mounting economic costs. The agreement would mark a temporary truce in Washington’s broader budget battles but leaves unresolved the deeper partisan divisions over health care, spending priorities, and fiscal governance.

Source: AP News – What’s in the legislation to end the federal government shutdown

The post U.S. Senate Advances Bipartisan Deal to End Historic Government Shutdown appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a 60–40 test vote, senators agreed to proceed with compromise legislation that would fund the government through late January and guarantee a separate mid-December vote on extending ACA tax credits set to expire on January 1. While the move brought Congress closer to reopening federal operations, final passage could still take several days as debate continues.

Moderate Democrats Break Six-Week Deadlock

The breakthrough came after a group of moderate Democrats and Independents—New Hampshire Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan, and Independent Senator Angus King of Maine—brokered a deal with Republican leaders to advance three bipartisan spending bills.

In exchange, Senate leaders agreed to hold a future vote on health care subsidies, ending a six-week stalemate that had paralyzed Washington. The agreement also reverses layoffs of federal workers triggered by the shutdown, ensures back pay once the government reopens, and protects against further reductions in force through January.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) endorsed the compromise, calling it “a necessary step to get Americans back to work.” “The time to act is now,” Thune said, urging lawmakers to move quickly as the shutdown continued to disrupt flights and threaten food assistance for millions.

President Donald Trump, returning to Washington from a football game on Sunday evening, told reporters the deal “looks like we’re getting close to the shutdown ending,” though he stopped short of endorsing the measure outright.

Five Democrats Cross Party Lines

Only five Democrats ultimately voted with Republicans to advance the deal—precisely the number needed for the 60-vote threshold. In addition to Shaheen, King, and Hassan, Senators Tim Kaine of Virginia, Dick Durbin of Illinois, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, and Nevada’s Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen supported the motion.

Negotiators had expected broader Democratic support, with as many as a dozen senators participating in early talks. The vote was briefly delayed as Republican Senators Mike Lee, Rick Scott, and Ron Johnson—frequent critics of large spending bills—conferred privately with Thune before casting their votes in favor. Senator John Cornyn of Texas flew back from his home state to deliver the decisive 60th vote.

Schumer, Progressives Oppose Deal

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer voted against the motion, saying he could not “in good faith” support a deal that lacked a firm commitment to maintaining ACA subsidies. “We will not give up the fight,” Schumer said after a two-hour caucus meeting.

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont called the move a “horrific mistake,” while Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) argued that recent election results showed voters “want Democrats to hold firm” on health care.

House progressives reacted sharply to the Senate compromise. Representative Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said the deal “betrays millions of Americans who depend on affordable health care,” calling it “capitulation, not compromise.” Representative Angie Craig (D-Minn.) dismissed the agreement as “no deal at all.”

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries blamed Republicans for the crisis, saying, “Donald Trump and the Republican Party own the toxic mess they have created.”

Funding Plan Extends Through January

The compromise legislation includes three bipartisan appropriations bills negotiated by the Senate Appropriations Committee, covering food assistance, veterans’ programs, and legislative operations. Funding for other parts of the government would be extended through late January, giving lawmakers additional time to complete full-year spending measures.

The package also reimburses states that used their own funds to sustain federal programs during the shutdown.

Health Care Vote Set for December

The deal guarantees a Senate vote in December on extending the ACA tax credits—benefits that subsidize insurance premiums for millions of Americans. While some Republicans have expressed openness to renewal, others, including Trump, have revived calls to overhaul or repeal the law.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has said he will not commit to scheduling a vote in his chamber, leaving the future of the subsidies uncertain.

Shutdown Fallout Deepens

As negotiations continued, the effects of the shutdown worsened nationwide. According to FlightAware, more than 2,000 U.S. flights were canceled and 7,000 delayed on Sunday, marking the first day since the shutdown began that cancellations surpassed 2,000.

Treasury Secretary Sean Duffy warned on CNN’s State of the Union that Thanksgiving travel could be “reduced to a trickle” if the government remains closed.

Food assistance programs were also under strain, with delays in distributing Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits affecting tens of millions of Americans. In Washington, D.C., the Capital Area Food Bank reported preparing nearly 8 million more meals than planned—a 20% increase—to support unpaid federal workers.

A Fragile Path Forward

The tentative Senate breakthrough marks the first movement toward reopening the government since the shutdown began on October 1. But with major disagreements over health care, spending priorities, and political strategy still unresolved, lawmakers face a difficult road ahead.

Whether Congress can bridge those divides in time to restore stability—and prevent another shutdown early next year—remains uncertain.

Source: AP News – Senate takes first step toward ending the government shutdown

The post Senate Moves Toward Ending U.S. Government Shutdown Amid Health Care Rift appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.