A draft peace initiative linked to former U.S. President Donald Trump has been delivered to Ukrainian officials, offering a framework to end Russia’s war through sweeping political, territorial, and security arrangements. The Associated Press reported that Washington and Moscow cooperated in shaping the proposal, which contains provisions more favorable to Russia and would require Ukraine to limit its military posture and renounce NATO membership. The document’s reception remains unclear as Kyiv and Western allies assess its implications.

Overview of the Draft Framework

The 28-point draft agreement seeks to establish a long-term settlement to the conflict by combining security guarantees, territorial arrangements, and economic reconstruction. According to the Associated Press, the document affirms Ukraine’s sovereignty while simultaneously proposing restrictions on military capacity and alignment. The framework also outlines commitments for Russia, NATO, the United States, and European partners.

The proposal positions the United States as a mediator and guarantor of the peace deal, including provisions for sanctions policy, defense cooperation, and future economic integration. Observers note that the plan echoes past debates surrounding European security architecture, NATO enlargement, and contested territories in eastern Ukraine.

Security Commitments and Non-Aggression Measures

Sovereignty and Security Guarantees

The draft begins with a formal affirmation of Ukraine’s sovereignty, followed by the creation of a comprehensive non-aggression agreement among Russia, Ukraine, and Europe. The document states that ambiguities of the post-Cold War era would be “considered settled.”

It further outlines expectations that Russia will not invade neighboring states and NATO will halt any further expansion. This provision revives longstanding disputes between Moscow and NATO members, particularly regarding alliance enlargement toward Eastern Europe. The United States would mediate a renewed security dialogue between Russia and NATO to address regional concerns, de-escalate tensions, and support future economic cooperation.

Limits on Ukraine’s Military Posture

The proposal requires Ukraine to cap its armed forces at 600,000 personnel. It also calls for Ukraine to codify its non-accession to NATO through constitutional reforms, with NATO pledging in turn to amend its statutes to ensure Ukraine cannot join in the future. The alliance would additionally commit not to deploy troops inside Ukraine.

The framework includes a provision for European fighter jets to be stationed in Poland, though it does not specify the intended operational purpose.

U.S. Security Guarantee and Enforcement Mechanisms

The United States would provide Ukraine with a security guarantee under several conditions. The guarantee could be revoked if Ukraine were to initiate hostilities against Russia, while any renewed Russian invasion would trigger a coordinated military response and restore international sanctions on Moscow.

The guarantee also addresses missile attacks, stipulating that an unprovoked Ukrainian strike on Moscow or St. Petersburg would nullify U.S. protection. Analysts note that such conditions appear to impose strict behavioral constraints on Kyiv, raising questions about deterrence and sovereignty.

European Integration and Reconstruction Plans

EU Eligibility and Economic Access

The draft states that Ukraine would retain eligibility for European Union membership. While the accession process typically requires extensive reforms and approval from all EU states, the document envisions Ukraine receiving preferential access to European markets during consideration.

Global Reconstruction Package

A major component of the proposal is a global economic initiative to rebuild Ukraine. It calls for a Ukraine Development Fund focusing on technology, artificial intelligence, energy infrastructure, and urban reconstruction. The World Bank would design a financing package to accelerate investment and rehabilitation efforts.

The United States and Ukraine would collaborate to modernize gas pipelines and storage facilities, while joint projects would target war-damaged regions and large-scale infrastructure.

Russia’s Economic Reintegration and Sanctions Policy

The plan proposes a phased return of Russia to the global economy. Discussions would focus on lifting sanctions incrementally and negotiating a long-term U.S.–Russia economic cooperation agreement covering energy, rare earth minerals, natural resources, and Arctic development. The proposal also states that Russia should be invited to rejoin the G8.

Use of Frozen Assets

One section outlines the use of frozen Russian assets for reconstruction. It allocates $100 billion in Russian funds to U.S.-led rebuilding programs in Ukraine, with Europe contributing an additional $100 billion. The U.S. would receive 50% of profits from these investments. The remaining frozen Russian assets would support a U.S.–Russia investment mechanism aimed at strengthening economic ties and preventing renewed conflict.

Nuclear Security and IAEA Oversight

The draft proposes extending nuclear non-proliferation treaties between the United States and Russia, including elements of the START I framework. Ukraine would reaffirm its non-nuclear status under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, currently under Russian control, would operate under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, with electricity output divided equally between Russia and Ukraine.

Social, Cultural, and Humanitarian Provisions

Education and Tolerance Measures

Both countries would commit to implementing programs promoting cultural understanding and combating discrimination. Ukraine would adopt EU rules on religious tolerance and linguistic minority protections. The proposal also mandates the prohibition of Nazi ideology and guarantees non-discriminatory conditions for Ukrainian and Russian media and education systems.

Humanitarian Measures

A dedicated committee would address remaining humanitarian issues, including an “all-for-all” exchange of prisoners and remains, the return of civilian detainees and children, and a family reunification program. The draft further calls for broader efforts to assist victims of the conflict.

Territorial Arrangements and Demilitarization

One of the proposal’s most contentious sections outlines territorial arrangements:

• Ukraine and the United States would recognize Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk as de facto Russian.

• Kherson and Zaporizhzhia would be frozen along current lines of contact, effectively resulting in provisional recognition.

• Russia would relinquish certain unspecified territories outside these regions.

• Ukrainian forces would withdraw from parts of Donetsk they currently control, creating a demilitarized buffer zone internationally recognized as Russian territory. Russian forces would not enter this zone.

Both Russia and Ukraine would pledge not to alter these borders by force, with guarantees suspended in the event of a breach.

Governance, Elections, and Oversight

The draft calls for Ukraine to hold national elections within 100 days of the agreement. All parties would receive full amnesty for wartime actions and agree not to pursue future claims.

A Peace Council led by Donald Trump would monitor implementation and impose sanctions for violations. A joint U.S.–Russia working group on security issues would oversee compliance.

A ceasefire would take effect once the agreement is signed and both sides withdraw to designated positions.

Source: AP News – This is Trump’s plan to end the war in Ukraine

The post Trump’s Draft Ukraine Peace Plan Presented in Kyiv as 28-Point Proposal Draws Global Attention appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Published: August 8, 2025, 14:00 U.S. Eastern Time

U.S. President Donald Trump stated Thursday that he is prepared to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin even if the Kremlin leader declines to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The comments come amid speculation that Washington and Moscow may soon hold a high-level summit, possibly in the United Arab Emirates.

The announcement has stirred debate among diplomats and analysts over whether bypassing Ukraine in such discussions could sideline Kyiv’s interests in ongoing peace efforts for the nearly three-year-long war.

Potential Summit on the Horizon

Putin earlier expressed hope for a meeting with Trump as soon as next week, potentially hosted in the UAE. However, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt clarified that discussions over the meeting’s details are still underway.

When asked whether Putin’s participation in a summit would require prior talks with Zelenskyy, Trump responded, “No, he doesn’t. No.”

Initially, a U.S. official told The Associated Press that the absence of a Putin-Zelenskyy meeting would prevent a Trump-Putin summit. The official later revised the statement, saying it would only make such a meeting less likely. The comment was made on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.

A face-to-face between Trump and Putin would be a diplomatic boost for the Russian leader, who has consistently rejected Zelenskyy’s offers for direct talks. Putin has long hinted at a willingness to meet Trump to discuss ending hostilities in Ukraine.

Diplomatic Tensions and Deadlines

Putin’s remarks came just ahead of a White House deadline for Moscow to demonstrate progress toward ending the conflict or face additional economic sanctions.

Asked Thursday whether the deadline would remain in place, Trump said, “It’s going to be up to him. We’re going to see what he has to say. Very disappointed,” referring to Putin’s stance.

Putin, while not ruling out talks with Zelenskyy, said conditions must be “created” before such a meeting could happen. The Kremlin has previously stated that a meeting between the two leaders should only occur if a near-final agreement has been reached by their negotiating teams.

Concerns Over Ukraine’s Role

Ukraine fears being sidelined in direct negotiations between Washington and Moscow. Zelenskyy held calls with several European leaders Thursday, stressing the need for Europe’s direct involvement in ending the war.

“Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same bold approach from the Russian side. It is time to end the war,” Zelenskyy said, adding that any agreement must include a ceasefire and long-term security guarantees backed by the U.S. and European nations.

Despite Trump’s public calls for restraint, Russian attacks continue. A recent strike in Ukraine’s central Dnipro region killed four civilians and injured eight others, according to Kyiv officials.

Kremlin Priorities and U.S. Proposals

Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, emphasized that preparations for a productive bilateral meeting with Trump are the Kremlin’s main focus. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff had suggested including Ukraine’s leader in the summit, but Ushakov said the idea “was not specifically discussed.”

The announcement followed Putin’s meeting with UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Asked about who initiated the possible summit, Putin replied, “It doesn’t matter — both sides expressed an interest.”

Kirill Dmitriev, head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, said the talks could allow Moscow to present its position clearly and discuss mutually beneficial economic initiatives, including cooperation in rare earth element development.

Historical Context and Strategic Stakes

If held, the summit would mark the first U.S.-Russia leader meeting since 2021, when former President Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva. While Trump has claimed he could broker a deal to end the war, there is no guarantee such a meeting would yield a breakthrough, given the deep divide between Moscow and Kyiv over peace terms.

The war has killed tens of thousands of soldiers from both nations and more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to United Nations figures. Western officials accuse Putin of prolonging the conflict to secure more territorial gains.

Trump’s early second-term approach to Putin was conciliatory, echoing some Kremlin talking points. Recently, however, he has expressed growing frustration, criticizing Putin for resisting U.S.-led peace proposals and warning of new sanctions if progress stalls.

Shifting Ukrainian Public Opinion

A new Gallup poll suggests Ukrainians’ attitudes toward negotiations are shifting. Conducted in early July, the survey found that about 70% of Ukrainians now support pursuing a peace settlement as soon as possible — a stark reversal from 2022, when three-quarters favored fighting until victory.

Support for prolonging the war has declined across all regions and demographics. The poll excluded territories under Russian control, representing roughly 10% of Ukraine’s pre-war population.

Mixed Reactions in Kyiv

In Kyiv, residents voiced contrasting opinions on the potential Trump-Putin meeting.

“Negotiations are necessary, and we all want the war to end… because it will only end with talks,” said Ruslan Prindun.

Others were skeptical. Volodymyr Tasak argued it was “unlikely anything good” would come from the talks and feared Zelenskyy was being pushed aside. Lyudmila Kostrova believed Putin’s interest in meeting Trump was aimed at avoiding further sanctions rather than ending the war.

Source: AP News – Trump says he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader won’t meet with Ukraine’s Zelenskyy

The post Trump Open to Meeting Putin Without Precondition to Meet Zelenskyy appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

July 23, 2025 – 4:30 PM

Iran is stepping up efforts to rearm its regional proxies just as potential nuclear negotiations with the U.S. show signs of fading. From Yemen to Lebanon, Tehran’s allies are growing more active again, despite recent blows to Iran’s military leadership and influence. The timing suggests Iran is preparing to bolster its regional position before reengaging in diplomacy.

What happened

Over the past few weeks, Iran has reenergized its support for proxy groups across the Middle East. These include the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Shiite militias in Iraq, and armed networks operating through Syria.

This uptick in activity comes after nearly two years of Israeli strikes that have significantly weakened Tehran’s regional reach. But according to analysts, Iran’s leadership wants to demonstrate that despite those losses, it remains capable of projecting power.

“They want to show they’re still intact, that nothing has changed,” said Michael Knights of The Washington Institute. “If you’re the Quds Force right now, that’s your message.”

Yemen: Largest weapons seizure in years

One of the most dramatic developments happened in the Red Sea.

Just three days after a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, a ship carrying 750 tons of Iranian weapons—including missiles, drone engines, and radar equipment—was intercepted. The U.S. Central Command confirmed that the shipment was bound for the Houthis.

This marked the largest weapons seizure in the history of Yemen’s National Resistance Forces, led by Tariq Saleh.

Iran’s foreign ministry denied the shipment, calling the report “a deceitful attempt” to mislead the public.

Still, Houthi attacks have clearly resumed. A Greek-owned commercial ship was struck, killing four and leaving eleven missing. Another ship, the MV Magic Seas, was targeted with drones and sank—signaling the Houthis’ renewed aggression in the vital shipping corridor.

Iraq: Drone attacks target energy infrastructure

In Iraq, suspected Iran-backed militias have ramped up attacks on oil facilities in the Kurdish region.

According to Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) officials, five oil fields—two operated by U.S. companies—were targeted in recent drone attacks.

“This is a calculated campaign to economically strangle us,” said KRG official Aziz Ahmad.

Peshawa Hawramani, a KRG spokesperson, said the goal of the attacks is to cripple the region’s ability to produce energy, thereby removing a key bargaining chip in internal Iraqi negotiations.

The KRG blames the Popular Mobilization Units, a Shiite paramilitary group backed by Iran, for the bomb-laden drone attacks near Erbil and other key sites.

Lebanon: Hezbollah weakened but still active

Iran’s top regional partner, Hezbollah, has taken major hits since Israel’s October 7 response to Hamas’s attack.

Its long-time leader, Hassan Nasrallah, was killed in an Israeli strike. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, a key Hezbollah ally, was deposed in December—cutting off crucial supply lines.

Now, Hezbollah faces growing domestic and international calls to disarm.

“They’ve lost credibility even within their own base,” a regional official told CNN.

Still, Hezbollah remains a concern. Sources say the group may try to regroup in the coming weeks, fearing a larger Israeli offensive. With its position more fragile than ever, the group sees its current status as “existential,” according to sources familiar with Lebanese dynamics.

Syria: Smuggling routes disrupted

The new Syrian government has also taken a hard line against Iranian influence.

Several Iranian arms shipments headed for Hezbollah in Lebanon have been intercepted in the past year, according to Syrian officials.

One high-profile seizure included anti-tank Kornet missiles hidden inside a vegetable truck near Homs, just miles from the Lebanese border.

“We’re intercepting Iranian shipments quite often,” a senior Syrian official said. “They’re small, pieced together locally, and smuggled to Lebanon.”

He also noted that financial transfers from Iran to proxy networks are now being funneled through Iraq, further complicating oversight.

Why this matters now

Iran’s recent moves come as diplomatic momentum between Tehran and Washington stalls.

President Donald Trump, speaking Wednesday, showed little urgency to return to talks. “We’re in no rush… we bombed the hell out of their various places,” he said.

Iranian officials echoed that lack of enthusiasm. Senior adviser Ali Larijani said on Friday, “Right now is not the time for talks. Negotiations are a tactic… we wait and see if the Supreme Leader finds it useful.”

A sixth round of U.S.-Iran negotiations was set for June 15 but was canceled after a surprise Israeli airstrike.

Despite public posturing, analysts say Iran’s push to revive its proxy network may be part of a bigger strategy—to gain leverage before returning to the table.

“They want to appear defiant,” Knights said. “Not so defiant that the U.S. hits them again, but enough to look like they’re still in control.”

Final thoughts

Iran’s rearming of its proxy allies signals a clear attempt to regain regional clout, even after suffering major military and political setbacks.

From shipping weapons to the Houthis, to suspected drone strikes in Iraq, and intercepted missile shipments in Syria, the message from Tehran is unmistakable: its influence may be bruised—but it isn’t broken.

Whether this posturing leads to a new round of U.S.-Iran talks remains uncertain. But as the region braces for potential escalation, all eyes are once again on Iran’s next move.

Stay tuned for more updates on Middle East conflicts, nuclear negotiations, and international diplomacy. Share your thoughts in the comments or follow for more in-depth coverage.

Source: CNN – ‘Nothing has changed’: Iran tries to rearm proxy groups as US talks stall

The post Iran ramps up proxy support as US nuclear talks stall appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

BERLIN — In a bold move signaling stronger Western military support for Ukraine, Germany’s newly appointed Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Monday that Germany, along with other major allies, has lifted all range restrictions on weapons supplied to Ukraine. This change allows Kyiv to strike deeper into Russian territory as it continues its defense against Russia’s ongoing invasion.

Speaking at a forum organized by Germany’s public broadcaster WDR, Merz stated, “There are no longer any range restrictions for weapons delivered to Ukraine — neither by the British, the French, us, nor the Americans.” Simply put, this means Ukraine can now target military positions much farther inside Russia, a capability it was previously denied.

Merz described this capability as “long-range fire,” referring to weapons systems capable of hitting military objectives far behind enemy lines. While he did not specify the exact weapons involved, experts believe this signals an easing of earlier restrictions on longer-range arms that began in late 2023.

Why This Matters: A Shift in Western Support

This announcement marks a significant shift in the West’s approach to supporting Ukraine’s war effort. Since Russia launched its invasion in February 2022, Western countries—including the U.S., UK, France, and Germany—have supplied Ukraine with a variety of weapons, but often with limitations on their range to avoid escalating the conflict beyond Ukrainian territory.

Germany has historically been cautious, providing defensive weaponry but hesitating to supply longer-range missiles. This cautious approach was largely shaped by concerns over provoking Russia or broadening the war.

Now, with Merz at the helm since early April, Germany appears ready to adopt a more assertive stance. Germany has been the second-largest provider of military aid to Ukraine after the United States, supplying tanks, artillery, and other critical equipment. Removing range restrictions could empower Ukraine to hit deeper Russian military targets, potentially shifting the strategic balance on the battlefield.

Diplomatic Reactions: Moscow’s Warning

The Kremlin responded swiftly. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov called the decision “quite dangerous” and warned it could hinder efforts toward a peaceful political settlement. Russia views the supply of long-range weapons as a direct escalation, potentially increasing the conflict’s intensity and scope.

The Taurus Missile Debate: What’s Next for Germany’s Aid?

One of the most discussed questions is whether Germany will now approve the delivery of Taurus long-range cruise missiles, which can reach targets up to 500 kilometers (about 310 miles) away. Merz’s predecessor, Chancellor Olaf Scholz, consistently rejected supplying these missiles, citing the risk of escalating the war.

Merz, however, advocated for sending Taurus missiles while in opposition, suggesting a potential policy shift. Still, the German government is currently maintaining “strategic ambiguity” about the exact nature of its weapons shipments to Ukraine, deliberately withholding detailed information to avoid political backlash or tipping off adversaries.

Looking Ahead

This policy change signals a clear escalation in Western military support for Ukraine, enabling Kyiv to defend itself more aggressively and target Russian forces beyond the immediate frontline. While it may increase tensions between NATO countries and Russia, it also reflects growing Western resolve to back Ukraine’s fight for sovereignty and territorial integrity.

As the war enters its second year, developments like these underline the complex balance of supporting Ukraine without sparking a wider conflict — a tightrope Germany and its allies are continuing to walk carefully.

Source: AP News – Germany’s Merz says there are no more range restrictions on the weapons supplied to Ukraine

The post Chancellor Merz Confirms No More Restrictions on Ukraine’s Long-Range Arms appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Iran and the United States began their fifth round of critical nuclear negotiations in Rome on Friday, but skepticism is running high in Tehran about the chances of a deal. Sources close to Iran tell CNN that with the US taking a harder stance, a breakthrough appears unlikely.

Key Roadblock: Uranium Enrichment

At the heart of the deadlock is the US demand that Iran completely dismantle its uranium enrichment program—a red line Tehran says would collapse any chance of agreement. Two Iranian insiders say Iran’s participation in the talks is mainly to assess Washington’s current position, not to push for a deal.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi made Tehran’s stance crystal clear before leaving for Rome:
“Zero nuclear weapons = we do have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal.”

Enrichment of uranium can lead to nuclear weapons if taken to high levels, but Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful. Tehran says it is open to international inspectors but will not give up its right to enrich uranium for energy.

Growing Distrust Over US Intentions

Sources say Iranian officials increasingly doubt Washington’s sincerity. They believe the US knows zero enrichment is unacceptable to Tehran but insists on it anyway—signaling that the US is using talks more as a pressure tactic than a genuine effort to reach an agreement.

Some Iranian policymakers once hoped for a “win-win” compromise, but now many see the talks heading towards a stalemate. Both sides don’t want to walk away from the table, but the US’s firm position makes progress seem unlikely.

Iran also suspects the US is closely following Israel’s hardline agenda. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been adamant that Iran should not be allowed any uranium enrichment—a stance that Tehran believes is guiding the US approach.

US Increases Pressure with New Sanctions

Even as diplomacy continues, Washington is tightening the screws on Iran. Just days before the talks, the US imposed fresh sanctions targeting Iran’s construction sector, accusing it of links to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its nuclear and missile programs.

Iran’s foreign ministry denounced the sanctions as “unlawful and inhuman,” arguing they reveal US unwillingness to negotiate seriously and only strengthen Iranian resolve against American pressure.

Experts Warn of Missteps

Analysts warn Washington is misreading Iran’s mindset. Ali Vaez, Iran expert at the International Crisis Group, explains that a weakened Iran is less likely to concede—fearing that backing down under pressure could threaten the regime’s survival.

Meanwhile, reports indicate Israel is preparing for possible strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, raising fears of military escalation. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee acknowledged that Washington is aware of these preparations and may support Israel’s right to defend itself if necessary.

What’s Next?

Experts say an Israeli attack would likely end negotiations and could push Iran to abandon nuclear treaties altogether. The US insistence on zero enrichment may be driving Iran toward a tougher stance, with Tehran ready to retaliate if threatened.

In this tense environment, analysts emphasize that quiet, behind-the-scenes diplomacy offers the best chance to revive talks and avoid conflict. But for now, with both sides standing firm, a deal remains elusive.

Source: CNN – Iran doesn’t believe a nuclear deal is likely, sources say, as talks with US resume

The post Iran Skeptical About Nuclear Agreement as Talks Restart in Rome appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Tensions between Ukraine and Russia showed no signs of easing overnight, as both sides accused each other of launching drone strikes just hours after a high-profile phone call between Russian President Vladimir Putin and former U.S. President Donald Trump.

According to Ukraine’s Air Force, Russia launched 108 Iranian-made Shahed drones along with other decoy drones across multiple regions. Ukrainian defenses reportedly shot down 93 of them across the east, center, and north of the country. The barrage came shortly after Trump and Putin held a nearly two-hour conversation—Trump from the Oval Office and Putin from a music school in Sochi.

Ceasefire Talks Hit a Wall

Following the call, Trump announced that both Kyiv and Moscow would begin ceasefire negotiations “immediately.” However, Putin offered a more cautious tone, saying Russia was open to discussing a “possible ceasefire for a certain period of time” if certain agreements were reached. Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov later confirmed that no timeline had been set during the conversation.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky dismissed the gesture as a delay tactic.

“It is obvious that Russia is trying to buy time in order to continue its war and occupation,” Zelensky said on social media, following a conversation with Finnish President Alexander Stubb.

Putin has already turned down a proposed 30-day ceasefire from Washington and Kyiv and previously rejected Zelensky’s call for direct talks in Istanbul.

No Real Progress, Say Ukrainian Officials

Zelensky’s advisor Mykhailo Podolyak said the Trump–Putin call failed to move the needle.

“Unfortunately, following the Trump–Putin phone call, the status quo has not changed,” he said.

Meanwhile, European leaders, briefed by Trump, opted to ramp up sanctions against Moscow. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz confirmed the move in a statement posted to X (formerly Twitter) late Monday.

Despite this, Trump cautioned against endorsing new U.S. sanctions.

“I think there’s a chance of getting something done,” Trump said. “And if you do that [impose more sanctions], you could also make it much worse.”

Talks About Talks

While Zelensky confirmed discussions are underway about where future peace talks might be held, no official decision has been made. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia remains focused on resolving the conflict by addressing its “root causes.”

But to U.S. officials, that phrase signals more than negotiation.

“He wants Ukraine to surrender,” said William Taylor, former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine.
“He wants Ukraine to disarm—to be in a position where the Ukrainians cannot defend themselves. That’s what Putin means when he says ‘the root causes.’”

As drone warfare continues and diplomatic language grows more cautious, hopes for a swift ceasefire appear dim, despite Trump’s involvement.

Source: CNN – Ukraine, Russia say drone strikes continue after Trump-Putin call

The post Drone Strikes Continue After Trump and Putin Talk Peace appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a powerful show of unity and support for Ukraine, the leaders of Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Poland visited Kyiv this weekend and issued a clear message to Moscow: agree to a 30-day ceasefire starting Monday—or face sweeping new sanctions.

French President Emmanuel Macron, speaking alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, said the demand comes with full backing from the White House, following a joint call with U.S. President Donald Trump.

Ceasefire on All Fronts

The proposed ceasefire would cover land, sea, and air operations. If successful, Macron said, it could open the door for immediate peace negotiations aimed at ending the war.

“We demand it together from Russia,” Zelensky declared during the joint press conference. “The ceasefire must be full, unconditional, and begin Monday, May 12. Anything less is a clear sign of an intent to drag out the war.”

Kremlin Pushes Back

Despite the unified front from Kyiv and its allies, the Kremlin isn’t budging—at least not yet. In an interview with CNN, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Russia is “resistant to any kind of pressure,” and while President Putin supports a ceasefire “in general,” he raised vague concerns that “still need answering.”

One likely sticking point? Western military aid to Ukraine. Peskov hinted to ABC News that Russia wants an end to U.S. and European weapons deliveries—a demand Kyiv and its allies are unlikely to entertain.

Leaders Arrive in Kyiv by Train

Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk arrived early Saturday morning by train. They were welcomed at Kyiv’s central station by Zelensky’s chief of staff and later paid tribute to Ukraine’s fallen soldiers at Independence Square before heading to Mariinsky Palace for high-level talks.

Later, the four leaders huddled around a phone for a joint call with President Trump. Ukraine’s Foreign Minister shared a photo of the moment online, describing the conversation as “fruitful.”

The Clock Is Ticking

With less than 36 hours to go, if Russia agrees, satellite monitoring and communication systems will need to activate quickly to enforce the ceasefire across multiple fronts.

Russia, meanwhile, has continued with short-term, unilateral ceasefires—like the one it declared ahead of its annual May 9 Victory Day celebration. That pause is set to expire at midnight. Ukraine reported hundreds of Russian attacks during this period, though there were no major airstrikes or drone attacks on cities since Wednesday.

A Shift in U.S. Diplomacy

Since Trump’s return to the White House in January, Ukraine and its European allies have been closely watching for changes in U.S. policy toward Moscow. Trump recently warned that failure to respect the proposed ceasefire would result in further sanctions—signaling a tougher stance than some expected.

Still, Peskov downplayed the pressure, saying, “We are very grateful for U.S. mediation efforts, but it’s quite useless to try to press on us.”

Rising Security Concerns

Amid ceasefire talks, the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv issued a security alert Friday, warning of a potential major air attack in the coming days based on intelligence reports.

With diplomacy hanging in the balance, all eyes now turn to Moscow—and whether Putin will seize the chance for de-escalation or face deeper international isolation.

Source: CNN – European leaders visit Kyiv, and tell Russia: 30-day ceasefire now or face massive sanctions

The post European Leaders Visit Kyiv, Demand 30-Day Ceasefire from Russia appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

In a new development in the ongoing conflict, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that Russian forces had regained control of the Kursk border region, a site of intense fighting since Ukraine’s surprise offensive last year. Putin hailed the victory as a significant achievement for Russia, claiming that Ukraine’s military operations in the area had completely failed.

However, Ukraine’s Armed Forces quickly disputed Putin’s statement, calling it “not true.” In a post on Telegram, the Ukrainian military confirmed that the fighting was far from over, with their forces continuing to defend key positions in the Kursk region despite difficult conditions.

“The defensive operation of the Ukrainian Defense Forces in the designated areas in Kursk region continues,” Ukraine’s General Staff wrote. “Our units continue to hold their positions and perform their assigned tasks.”

Though CNN is unable to independently verify battlefield claims, both Russia and Ukraine have struggled to secure major victories in other parts of the frontlines. Ukraine’s 2024 offensive, which began with a bold incursion into Kursk in August, marked the first time in decades that a foreign power launched a ground invasion into Russian territory. Ukraine’s forces initially made swift advances, capturing significant territory.

Since then, Russia, bolstered by support from North Korean soldiers, has been attempting to reclaim the land while Ukrainian forces continue to hold out, aiming to use the region as leverage in any future peace talks. The area’s strategic importance has also made it a key focus in the broader conflict, with the aim of relieving pressure on Ukraine’s eastern frontline.

Putin emphasized that recapturing Kursk would open the door for further Russian success on other parts of the front. Russian military officials, including General Valery Gerasimov, expressed gratitude to the North Korean troops who have supported Russian efforts. According to reports, around 12,000 North Korean soldiers have been deployed to the region.

Local authorities in Kursk are now focused on restoring “peaceful life,” according to Gerasimov, with efforts to clear mines and unexploded ordnance from the area. Special attention is being given to forest areas, basements, and abandoned buildings, which are being checked for any remaining Ukrainian troops.

If Putin’s claim is accurate, Ukraine’s hopes of using Kursk as a bargaining chip in peace talks could be dashed. A retreat from the region may also have broader consequences for Kyiv, potentially eroding both its political influence and military morale as it continues to face the challenges of a protracted war.

Despite ongoing diplomatic efforts, including attempts by the United States to broker peace talks, tensions remain high. U.S. President Donald Trump recently criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for complicating the negotiation process, accusing him of refusing to accept Russia’s annexation of Crimea. However, Trump also suggested that Ukraine and Russia might be “very close to a deal,” adding an unpredictable twist to the diplomatic landscape.

On the heels of these comments, Trump met with Zelensky in the Vatican during the funeral of Pope Francis, marking a significant moment in the diplomatic efforts. The White House called the meeting “productive,” while Zelensky expressed optimism, writing on X that the discussions “have potential to become historic, if we achieve joint results.”

However, just hours later, Trump suggested the U.S. may impose new sanctions on Russia in response to a recent wave of missile strikes on Kyiv. “There was no reason for Putin to be shooting missiles into civilian areas,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, questioning whether the Russian president truly seeks peace or simply aims to prolong the war. “Too many people are dying,” he added, suggesting that more stringent measures might be necessary to end the conflict.

As the situation in Kursk remains unresolved and diplomatic channels continue to evolve, the conflict’s outcome remains uncertain. The world watches closely as both sides brace for further developments in this complex and volatile war.

Source: CNN – Russia claims recapture of Kursk border region but Ukraine says fighting continues

The post Russia Claims Victory in Kursk, But Ukraine Says Fighting Continues appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

Former President Donald Trump took to social media with a stark message for Russian President Vladimir Putin following a devastating Russian missile and drone barrage on Kyiv — the deadliest in nine months. “Vladimir, STOP!” Trump posted on Truth Social, adding, “5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let’s get the Peace Deal DONE!”

The overnight assault, which targeted 13 locations across the Ukrainian capital, killed at least 12 people and injured 90 more. Ukraine’s emergency services warned that additional casualties may still be trapped beneath the rubble, as rescue operations continued through the day.

Russia launched 70 missiles and 145 drones in the coordinated attack, which struck residential buildings and civilian infrastructure in Kyiv. It marked the most severe attack on the city since July 2024, when an airstrike killed 33 people.

Air raid sirens blared for six straight hours as terrified residents hunkered down. “The first thing I felt was fear,” said Iryna Dzen, who lives in one of the hardest-hit areas. “You don’t know if your family is alive. We ran to the corridor—it felt safer—and started calling everyone.”

Images from emergency responders showed buildings engulfed in flames, while engineers, rescue workers, and dogs searched for survivors amid the rubble in Kyiv’s Sviatoshyn district.

Among the victims: a 21-year-old man and his 19-year-old sister.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was in South Africa when the attack hit, cut his trip short and announced his immediate return to Ukraine. Speaking to reporters before Trump’s social media post, Zelensky described the attack as one of the “most complex and daring” Russia has launched to date.

“This is about our survival,” he said. “We’re being very direct. I don’t see strong pressure on Russia or new sanctions being imposed for this aggression.”

Zelensky also pushed back against U.S. pressure to agree to a ceasefire, warning that accepting such a deal while under attack would be a dangerous concession. “The fact that Ukraine is ready to sit down after a full ceasefire is already a big compromise,” he said.

Trump’s sharp words come amid renewed tensions with Zelensky, particularly over the future of Crimea. U.S. officials have floated a controversial peace proposal that would formally recognize Russia’s control over the annexed region — a plan that would mark a major shift in U.S. policy and break with long-held international norms against altering borders by force.

Zelensky has firmly rejected the idea, citing Ukraine’s constitution and sovereignty. In response, Trump criticized the Ukrainian leader’s stance as “very harmful to the Peace Negotiations with Russia,” accusing him of making “inflammatory statements.”

Adding to the pressure, U.S. Vice President JD Vance weighed in from India, warning that Ukraine and Russia have received a “very explicit proposal” and must now decide. “It’s time for them to either say ‘yes,’ or for the U.S. to walk away,” Vance said.

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s interior minister reported that eight regions across the country were targeted in the latest Russian onslaught, including Dnipro, Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia, calling it a “massive combined Russian attack.”

As Kyiv clears the rubble and grieves its dead, the world watches closely — not just for Ukraine’s next move, but also for signs of where U.S. policy might go next in a war that shows no signs of slowing down.

Source: CNN – Trump writes ‘Vladimir, STOP!’ after Russia launches deadliest strikes on Kyiv since last summer

The post Trump to Putin: ‘Stop!’ After Russia Bombs Kyiv in Deadliest Attack in Months appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.

SRINAGAR, India — Tensions between India and Pakistan have sharply escalated following a deadly attack in Kashmir that killed 26 civilians. The fallout has triggered a wave of retaliatory measures on both sides, raising fears of further conflict in the region.

India, blaming Pakistan for the attack, revoked all visas for Pakistani nationals effective Sunday. Pakistani citizens currently in India have been ordered to leave before their visas expire. India also announced a series of additional punitive actions:

• Reduction of diplomatic staff in both countries
• Closure of the only operational land border crossing
• Suspension of the Indus Water Treaty, a landmark agreement that has endured through multiple wars

Pakistan struck back by:

• Closing its airspace to Indian-owned and operated airlines
• Suspending all trade with India, including indirect trade through third countries

The attack, which targeted civilians in the disputed region of Kashmir, is being described as the worst in years. India claims the assault has clear “cross-border links” to Pakistan, though no public evidence has been presented. A group calling itself Kashmir Resistance claimed responsibility.

Pakistan has denied any involvement, condemning what it calls India’s “belligerent measures.” Islamabad warned that any attempt by India to halt or redirect river flows under the water-sharing agreement would be considered an “act of war.”

Top ministers in both countries have hinted at the possibility of military action.
Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said any aggressive move by India would receive a “tit-for-tat kinetic response.”
India’s Defense Minister Rajnath Singh pledged to find and punish both the perpetrators and their backers.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi also sent a strong message at a rally:

“We will identify, track, and punish every terrorist, their handlers, and their backers. We will pursue them to the ends of the earth.”

India’s suspension of the Indus Water Treaty — a World Bank-brokered agreement from 1960 that governs the use of shared rivers — is particularly significant. The treaty has survived two wars and a major border conflict. For Pakistan, where agriculture heavily relies on these rivers, any disruption could be devastating.

Pakistan responded by staging public protests, with demonstrators gathering in cities like Islamabad outside the Indian High Commission, demanding a strong response.

Since 2019, when Modi’s government revoked Kashmir’s semi-autonomous status, tensions have remained high. While a ceasefire was renewed in 2021, this recent attack has put that fragile calm at risk.

Experts warn the situation could spiral.
Ashok Malik, a former Indian foreign ministry advisor, noted that military retaliation is on the table.

“There’s space for kinetic action under the nuclear threshold,” he said.
Meanwhile, Praveen Donthi of the International Crisis Group cautioned that Modi’s tough talk may leave India with limited options if tensions continue to rise.

The attack also sent shockwaves through Kashmir itself. Typically, militant actions target security forces, not civilians or tourists. But this incident triggered a rare outpouring of public grief.

Locals held candlelight vigils, and many businesses shut down in protest and mourning.

“People here are in fear and panic,” said Manzoor Ahmed, a hotel owner. “This will scare off the few tourists we have left.”

Several funerals have taken place across Indian cities, with an atmosphere of national grief and rising anger.

Source: AP News – India and Pakistan ramp up tit-for-tat spat as tensions mount over Kashmir attack

The post Tensions Rise as India Blames Pakistan for Kashmir Violence appeared first on Journos News - Breaking News, World News, Top Stories, Todays Headlines and Flash Reports.